What The World Never Knew About The Beatles 

satch woooosh

slip satch dude....

Exactly I already knew all of this it was still a good video but these are just facts.

i knew em allllllllll, research before watching.

@@jonnhyqwango7695 : Or research to confirm after watching. Don't believe everything you read or hear just on face value.

Raw Michigan I was just saying that

I knew this stuff, and I was never a big Beatles fan.

Then thd title is misleading. "What the world doesn't know about the beatles" half of these things, my little brother could've told you

Yeah. I am a new beatles fan and this,video taught me ALOT.

I'm a younger Beatle fan, born after their disbandment and deaths of two influential members but these facts are so basic that even I know them.

Beatle Fans Know What? The lyrics of the aforementioned Beatle Song Was Not inspired by some random letter. Wow!

@@Harvey3rdman I agree some of the information is misleading and just a hate.

JetInAJar lol

And then goes on to say "in 1976"

Yes, you would know better than McCartney, because after all , you were there, he wasn't.

@@lexdunn4160 you don't pass for an intelligent person, but nice try.

Oh good! Another internet troll showing off his massive intellect.@@plasticweapon

​@@lexdunn4160 McCartney was lying, don't believe everything he says

@@Kelvinack Hmm ... believe the guy who was there or believe some know-it-all on youtube ... tough choice ...

@Kitten Lyric yeah. They wanted to experiment and not have to worry about constantly pleasing fans and whatnot. They wanted their music not just to be heard, but to be *listened* to

michael Longford Yeah it really does

michael Longford because it’s alphabetical

I disagree. After decades of hearing Lennon-McCartney, people think that sounds better because they haven't heard McCartney-Lennon for decades. Who cares about how it rolls off the tongue anyway? And as teen boys both John and Paul shook hands and agreed that whoever wrote the majority of a song would get the first name credit listing. Their first album,'Please, Please Me', all of the original Beatles songs, which were primarily written by Lennon, were all listed as McCartney-Lennon. That was not fair to John, but it wasn't Paul's doing, it was the bigwigs at the label's doing. Then Lennon took a trip to Spain with Brian Epstein to "quid pro quo" a permanent reversal to the credit listing as Lennon-McCartney. This hurt Paul deeply that John would do that to him, but he went along with it as a 20 year old who thought Epstein, who got them their first recording contract, was a brilliant businessman who knew what he was doing. During Wings Over America tour in 1976, Paul reversed the name credit listing to McCartney-Lennon on HIS Beatle songs only, and John didn't complain or have a problem with it. After Lennon's death, Yoko had a problem with it, and sicced her lapdog flunky, Eliot Mintz to create a stink about it to the press, get the fans in an uproar, to sneer at McCartney "trying to steal credit and revise history". She and John was always better at PR than Paul, who took a "beating" by many Beatle fans, and music critics, who thought that he was being arrogant, like "angry" John described after the Beatles break up. But last year, 2017, Yoko herself got history revised and got co-credit for writing John's most iconic post Beatles song 'Imagine' by producing a film with a manipulated John, two days before he was killed, giving her more credit for the song than he gave himself. That said, I hope in the near future, before he dies, Paul gets to witness the McCartney-Lennon name change on Beatles songs that he wrote only, or a majority of, and get history to fairly and accurately recognized his creations, like he and John, as teen boys originally agreed. It's only fair.

Or we just haven't been around for decades anyway. ;)

It's alphabetical...baby!

Very true. I got what he was saying...

BlackDogJoker people are idiots, most have no ability to think for themselves.

As a Christian I am forgiving always. Those that claim to be and are not most likely aren’t really believers and give us a bad name. I love the Beatles and Lennon is and always will be my favorite of the four. I understood what he meant when he said they were more popular than Jesus.

Jesus didn't want Chapman to kill John.

@@beatlefan713I like the witty and sarcastic John of the 1963-1965 era. I felt the same way except that when John Lennon started taking the drugs and openly cheating with Yoko and ignoring Julian for 5 years. Also, we may be believing in the image that Brian Epstein set up-4 clean cut lads in collar less suits were really foul mouthed, pill popping, promiscuous, marijuana smoking, crude, brilliant songwriters with catchy hooks. All one has to do is read Allan WIlliams book: "The Man Who Gave The Beatles Away," to see what they were like in the early days before Brian Epstein.

sumljivi-John Lennon was definitely not one of 'the Jesus people', without long hair he was barely a hippie.

Depends if you sin on purpose you cannot be forgiving all this crap you here are liberal Christians rewriting the New Testament. One group even have lesbian and gay Priest.

Capitol at the time had been bought out by UK's EMI so it was a British company, but back then lots of things sold in the states had to be Americanized, I remember lots of UK films had their titles changed when released in America, I did read that that EMI threatened Capitol that they would ban the release of Sgt Pepper to the US if they tried to edit it.....

It was a way for Capitol to make more money. Split the original British album in two, there by making money off two Beatle albums vice one. Beatle's Butcher Cover was their response to Capitol's way of doing business.

I'd say they are definitely the most iconic band of all time. I can't think of anyone else who compares, really. Probably the best, as well. That's a lot more subjective, though.

I can't think of a band who's discography compares either

pretty obvious.

@@briandrescher5663 rhcp

Beatles were and still are light years ahead of any other band period.

But everybody doesn't know who wrote what, and some would like to know. I hope soon, before he dies, that Paul gets to witness his and John's original handshake agreement as teen friends, that whoever wrote the complete or majority of a song, got the first name credit listed. It's the only fair way for history to accurately record who wrote what. And there is precedent for McCartney/Lennon, since their debut album, 'Please, Please Me', listed McCartney/Lennon for all original Beatles songs.

Most of the time, the writing styles of Lennon and McCartney were easily identifiable. Sometimes, however, it wasn't so easy. John said he wrote "Day Tripper," on which Paul has most of the lead vocal. John also wrote "Good Night," which was sung by Ringo and sounds like a Paul song but it's not. Paul claims he wrote "Yellow Submarine" and "With a Little Help from My Friend," yet John and George are more clearly heard in "Yellow Submarine" than Paul, and John is the more prominent backing vocalist on "With a Little Help from My Friends." And both of those songs sound like John songs than Paul songs. But, John said in the Playboy interview just shortly before his death, that except for a few songs, he and Paul actually wrote many of the songs together.

I can tell just by their voices.

@@waterfalls5194 Hopefully Paul won't die for a long while but it's odd that the Beatles debut album credited the original songs to McCartney/Lennon considering most of the albums songs were written by Lennon, including the album's title song.

@@brannon5311 I agree. But that first album is also precedent for making the the change to back to McCartney-Lennon on songs written entirely, or majority by Paul. I think Yoko getting cowriting credit to John's song 'Imagine', also reinforces the fairness of returning to original handshake agreement of John and Paul, before John "quid pro quo'd" it into a permanent Lennon-McCartney with Brian Epstein in Spain.

Axess2084 It didn’t seem like a lot to me. But do you know some interesting facts about her? I’d like to know I’ve barely been thinking about her music or the Beatles lately.

Falco Gaming I didn’t know that. They seemed like they were happy together judging from how long they were married.

@@unamed2516 hmm,did you know that Yoko ono actually gave permission to Lennon to have a lover?

Falco Gaming Yeah I already watched that part with his killer. Or are you trying to give me a link?

gaming room No...I didn’t know that. That’s a really weird thing to do as a wife you’re not supposed to encourage your husband to be in a relationship with someone else that’s really messed up.

NOT ANY! MOST GOOD ONES...NOT THE EVIL jESUS DIED FOR YOU jOHN

zenith I always thought Paul was because he’s my favorite out of the group. He has a nice voice and writes good songs. But to be really fair and honest I think their all the best in their own way the proof is them breaking up and starting there own solo careers.

@@unamed2516 you're right

AcceptTheFamousEgg what on earth are you talking about George was not a pedophile

AcceptTheFamousEgg pretty sure they had there wives and girlfriends with them on them trips so.......

@AcceptTheFamousEgg age of consent in India is not 14 brov (W-18,M-22)

I was in high school in 1980, and the religious kids who knew I was a Beatles fan often brought up Lennon's Jesus comment with me. So the decade and a half that had passed didn't really make a difference to them.

MDC was a mind controlled puppet and the Widow Lennon's hands are not clean either.

He killed Lennon because he (the murderer)was a NUT JOB!

@@judithslone6472__Yes he was. He was a RECRUITED nut job, programmed to murder John Lennon, and no one else, then calmly wait for cops to arrive to confess guilt, claim sole responsibility, to stop law enforcement from investigating any further. "Official story" served on a plate.

@@waterfalls5194 Never thought of that.could be true..are there any videos on that?If so could you give me the links?

People blame yoko for the fall of the beatles, and Courtney love for the demise of Nirvana. Stop blaming people, it was their decisions. I feel very bad for John and the quote though. He was right, but at that time people weren't tolerant. Society is already gone, people are naturally evil today.

No, he wasn't. He was a religious extremist that killed John for being atheist.

He was a nobody and was jealous of John Lennon because he was talented and famous and Rich and all the things he wasn't and he thought by killing John Lennon that will make him famous and infamous all it did but make people want to kill him which somebody will someday I'm still counting on that

Chapman was affiliated with George H W Bush ex Head of the C_A (Clowns In America) and future President and HigherUp in the CABAL pecking order! Hmm...Go figure?

I never considered myself Christian, I wasn't interested in Christianity nor was I aware of how crazy some Christians are until Lennon made his misunderstood statement in 1966. Thank you, John, for enlightening me.

I don't know how my mother (who was a huge Lennon fan) came into this. He never said Jesus was worthless.

@James Brice LOL! This is priceless. My mother existed, I'm not certain about Jesus. If so, my mother was certainly more popular than Jesus.

It really annoys me when people completely misinterpret what Lennon says. A lot of people take his sarcastic and low down sense of humour as him being an asshole

@@brannon5311 ?... I don’t know what you’re trying to get at with that, but I just want to say that most historians believe Jesus was a real human being, despite whether or not he was truly the man he was written as

WoW!

especially when considering "Yesterday & Today" was basically half "Rubber Soul" & half "Revolver" with the "day tripper"/"we can work it out" double a-side included.

I too was lead to believe the butcher cover was a reference to American record companies butchering up the song selections on the US albums.

@@billkohler6292 That's exactly what I wrote.

also they are just plain wrong in the video, as some issues with the cover were released, and/or pasted over with the alternate artwork. This is Beatles 101.

Me too. She’s a blight in every way possible

That’s just you pushing your mysogyny against Yoko instead for wanting to admit that they were already arguing constantly

Wow you really are a Beatle fan...

@Miles Coverdale The new Paul did INDEED want the pre-eminence and control. Lennon gave that to him, and the band survived to make many more hits. However, the new 'Paul' - William Shepherd - and John did not get along like the ORIGINAL Paul and John. Original Paul replaced late '66. The closeness wasn't there. Plus, WIlliam ('Paul') didn't mind being aggressive to the other band members to get what he felt he needed from them musically, to produce the quality records he felt they could. Hence, the old love and friendship that governed the Beatles from the start until late '66 was GONE - after Paul was replaced by WIlliam Shepherd. (John called him FAUL - the Fake pAUL.) THIS is what GRADUALLY tore the Beatles apart. FURTHER, Faul was getting tired of being in the Beatle bubble as well.

Lennon wrote the opening lines while high on LSD. But we ALL knew that, right?

I believe in an interview with British DJ Pete Murray, Brian Epstein actually prefered his surname to be pronounced. Ep-Steen?

It's the Mandela effect Epstein and Epstien

and also on the original releases of the Please Please Me album

Any real Beatles fan would know how to pronounce Epstein's name.

i KNEW IT. .NOT THE SAME AS BRUCE..HE ISN'T jEWISH, Brian was Jewish and liked the rough trade....but a high class guy...had a thing for John...they experimented according to some....no one was really there, were you? Accidntal overdose the same day the Beatles went to Rishakesh, India

It’s also Lorne not Loren.

McCartney was being polite and repeating what John had said, which was what Yoko told John to say: "That she gave him the courage to leave". But the truth was and is: John was not impressed with Yoko, or her art when they first met. He ran from her, but they changed the story later to what is now considered "official narrative". She abandoned her daughter to stalk married father Lennon for 2 years, introduce him (already a drug addict) to heroin to get him hooked on it, so she could take over his life, make him leave his wife and child, and ride his famous coattails to Fast, Easy, Struggle Free FAME for herself, on the same level as Lennon's and The Beatles (same playbook as mind control puppet MDC). The reason John like Allen Klein so much, is because 'MotherYoko", liked what Klein had to say about using The Beatles earnings from their record sales profits (instead of just John's earnings) to finance and showcase her shitty art. Ain't that some nerve? She and John expected the other Beatles to take money away from their households and their families, to provide for and finance Yoko's attempts to gain fame for herself. Narcissistic ego run amuck!

Oh STFU! if he had balls he would of kicked her ass out.

Who are you addressing to STFU? And why? Because both ytubeanon and I are pretty much side eyeing John's words and behavior regarding Yoko and her ability [translation: manipulation of Lennon to do her bidding] to give him any "courage".

@@waterfalls5194 Stop making excuses for that asshole.

Shane Miller .......you’ve done nothing but denigrate John (on many sites) but offer no insight or information. Why visit sites about the man when you so clearly despise him? I liked John and regardless of what he was like as a man, he left us a wonderful musical legacy. Anyway, there is zero correlation between a man’s character and his artistic talents.

Why do you have to even say his name????

Biil..A true Christian wouldn't do what Chapman did..even though there are those who might think we would.

@ Bill .... this has got nothing to do with religion ! We know what kind of a violent man lennon was ! Get ur facts straight ! Your statement draws parallel to the analogy that if you comit a murder, its the fault of your poor parents in and out ! Go have a life ...douche-bag !!!

LOL BOI .....nah, you only know what you’ve read. At any rate, there is zero correlation between a man’s character and his creative talent.

Well their are those that follow jesus and others who follow religion, two different cases. Much of this is stereotype because a true Christian wouldn't do that.

@@Aaron-bb9rt I QUITE AGREE. JESUS WOULD HAVE CONDONED THE MURDER !.

Both. Popular rock. Remember they were number 1!

Ak Ak REVOLUTION 9 HAS A MUSIC VIDEO

@@haleeyoung "NUMBER NINE, NUMBER NINE xD

LENNON NEVER TRY to DESTROY christianity

.....and today"s Republican's don't seem to understand that the Republican party of Lincoln's era was the party of the people. It wasn't until after Lincoln the party flipped and locked in with the Billionaire class.

wow!

I heard the tickets for a concert nearby sold out a while ago

@@jaykeii that's a shame

@@manusk40 yeah ;-; Lmao I was just kidding 😂 they broke up a long time ago

@@jaykeii I know 😂

@@manusk40 completely unrelated but what Beatles tribute bands do you think are good?

Sansfunny lol this is a very good point like a really good point

popvinnik Yeah definitely.

No, that is true. Its in Pete Shotton's book.

@@SuperGogetem Just because it' in a book doesn't make it true. I mean look at the bible for instance.

You are asinine.

@@lexdunn4160 wow..that's really clever.

Gustavo: You mean Lennon or Lenin, I believe. If not, who is this Lennin to whom you refer?

Guapo viejo He’s asking how John’s last name is spelled.

Gustavo jorge Capiello machado Lennon.

John admitted that he had hit Cynthia several times and deeply regretted it. If you look for interviews with her, you can see she was a beautiful woman inside and out. Never did she slag John or say anything hateful or angry about anyone. She chose her words very carefully. Sadly, John was going downhill emotionally from some very deep losses and he neglected his family. When John divorced Cynthia, Paul stayed close friends with Cynthia and Julian. He would take the time to visit them, and when John had Julian on tour, you can often see Paul playing silly games with Julian and holding his hand. He was very good to them, and John didn't mind. John was very addicted to heavy drugs by then and couldn't handle the responsibility of a family.

He did because he was emotionally damaged from his childhood. He eventually realized and admitted his mistake and wrote about how he was sorry in his song Its getting Better " I used to be cruel to my woman I beat her and kept her apart from the things that she loved Man, I was mean but I'm changing my scene And I'm doing the best that I can"

Cynthia said in an interview that John hit her once because he was afraid that she would leave him. Which didn't help and they were broken up for about 3 months if I remember correct. John was very damaged from important people in his life leaving him, his father leaving him, his mothers passing and his uncles passing.

He was human garbage

Dan Igims Wow, what a dumb and unintelligent thing to say. He was flawed in the way that he was emotionally scarred because he felt that he was a jinx that brought people out of his life. So he hit Cynthia out of fear of forever losing and pushing away another loved one

Same

I remeber the rumor that J&Y were nude on the 'white album' making it imperative that it be covered in a hurry, hence the WHITE ALBUM.never heard it again.