Тёмный

What Would It Take To Sink USS Gerald R Ford Aircraft Carrier? 

The Infographics Show
Подписаться 14 млн
Просмотров 4,7 млн
50% 1

The USS Gerald Ford is the world's largest and most advanced aircraft carrier, a groundbreaking ship the likes of which has never been seen in human history. Over 1,000 feet (337m) in length, and displacing 100,000 tons, it is the largest warship ever built by man. But is the Ford truly unsinkable as some claim, and if not, what would it take? Hello, and welcome to another episode of The Infographics Show- today we're taking a look at what it would take to sink the USS Gerald Ford.
SUBSCRIBE TO US -► bit.ly/TheInfographicsShow
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
WEBSITE (SUGGEST A TOPIC):
theinfographicsshow.com
SUPPORT US:
Patreon.......► / theinfographicsshow
SOCIAL:
Twitter........► / theinfoshow
Subreddit...► / theinfographicsshow
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources for this episode:
pastebin.com/Lx9kTuqf

Опубликовано:

 

26 сен 2018

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 10 тыс.   
@TheInfographicsShow
@TheInfographicsShow 5 лет назад
If you should number your favourite movies including ships what would the order from 5 to 1 be? Which film genre would you choose - romance or action?
@cheesepuffs5226
@cheesepuffs5226 5 лет назад
cool 99 redwooolfttw well this is probably on the internet so it’s open to anyone
@cheesepuffs5226
@cheesepuffs5226 5 лет назад
cool 99 redwooolfttw by that I mean the information on the ship
@MadMax0417
@MadMax0417 5 лет назад
@@articcsyt9744 this is all already public information, if a youtube channel with no clearance on any information can get this information, whats stopping opposing forces?
@insertcomicalphraseman8330
@insertcomicalphraseman8330 5 лет назад
This was an unescarilly long video just to hit the 10 minute Mark to get ads. I know why your doing and I get but don't put in with filler but maybe a montage of actual good content instead of filler
@kenjihayashi668
@kenjihayashi668 5 лет назад
if not a neer peer war few would try to sink a carrier.the attack would force the u.s. to incinerate the attacker.
@quantomic1106
@quantomic1106 4 года назад
Rule no. 1 Never call a ship "Unsinkable".
@chrisflynn4655
@chrisflynn4655 4 года назад
The Green Bay Packers are Unsinkable
@zacharywilburn7253
@zacharywilburn7253 4 года назад
Lol yup
@godlymonkekyes2451
@godlymonkekyes2451 4 года назад
2 words: titanic Yamato.
@superpussycat6648
@superpussycat6648 4 года назад
What if it is made in styro?
@jacquesford4095
@jacquesford4095 4 года назад
Unsinkable the 2nd
@jillssandwiches42069
@jillssandwiches42069 3 года назад
“ferb, I know what we’re gonna do today!”
@skipscrop
@skipscrop 3 года назад
Underrated comment
@bigboyi4367
@bigboyi4367 3 года назад
SkipScrop indeed
@ryanmoore2464
@ryanmoore2464 3 года назад
Aren’t you a little old to be sinking a battleship? Yes
@IshijimaKairo
@IshijimaKairo 3 года назад
Let's si *nk the U.S.S Gerald R. Ford*
@jillssandwiches42069
@jillssandwiches42069 3 года назад
@@IshijimaKairo do you have or know how to make an experimental railgun?
@edoggydawg
@edoggydawg 3 года назад
Infographics: How to sink the USS Gerald China: I’m listening
@mohit4387
@mohit4387 3 года назад
Ur life will now be monitored by the the Americans and the Chinese
@MelanieDManning
@MelanieDManning 3 года назад
WRITE THAT DOWN WRITE THAT DOWN
@The_UPD.
@The_UPD. 3 года назад
Looking at Japan: ) ] [ Looking at USA: ]
@egg-...
@egg-... 3 года назад
I laughed when reading this comment
@anandanr
@anandanr 3 года назад
How many Gerald R Ford carriers are there? The vessel is scheduled to be commissioned in 2020, while further ships of the class will enter service at five-year intervals. A total of ten Ford-class carriers are planned with construction continuing to 2058. CVN 78 will replace USS Enterprise (CVN 65), which entered service in 1961 and decommissioned in 2017.
@CONSOLETRUTH2
@CONSOLETRUTH2 3 года назад
What could sink a FORD class carrier? Probably a CHEVROLET class carrier.
@ArkAstral
@ArkAstral 3 года назад
LOL
@user-7165jdhrnxymzn
@user-7165jdhrnxymzn 3 года назад
1 torpedo
@esalvador4197
@esalvador4197 3 года назад
@@user-7165jdhrnxymzn 1 torpedo ain't even enough to sink a ship
@kaulumapaulus9234
@kaulumapaulus9234 3 года назад
😂😂😂
@xela6349
@xela6349 3 года назад
@@esalvador4197 It totally is. At the right place, it can be devastating.
@laurenceandringa
@laurenceandringa 4 года назад
"Every ship is unsinkable, until it sinks". Admiral Michiel de Ruyter
@SpoilerAlert__
@SpoilerAlert__ 4 года назад
You're alive till you ain't
@nasimashima9585
@nasimashima9585 4 года назад
Best quote ever !
@Sultan-qk3od
@Sultan-qk3od 4 года назад
😁
@Janco1803
@Janco1803 4 года назад
Admiraal michiel de ruyter was een held
@rzor1911
@rzor1911 4 года назад
Best obvious quote ever!!!
@tsarkaiser6254
@tsarkaiser6254 4 года назад
Chinese: WRITE THAT DOWN! WRITE THAT DOWN!
@tlotlisomoletsane3598
@tlotlisomoletsane3598 4 года назад
You mean 写下来
@Slycarlo
@Slycarlo 4 года назад
Nah they can’t even find a cure for ncov ard 19
@wish6150
@wish6150 4 года назад
@@Slycarlo and the US cant even solve school shooting problems
@bansyiemlieh3213
@bansyiemlieh3213 4 года назад
😂
@DevinEMILE
@DevinEMILE 4 года назад
WSH WSH how would you solve the problem?
@VIIIrats
@VIIIrats 3 года назад
Ah yes, i too carry 162 anti-air guns on my person for “self defense”
@garethpreston8275
@garethpreston8275 3 года назад
I conceal carry just a single invasion ready USS Gerald R Ford super carrier at home in the evening. The one time I don't have it China will be lurking around the back yard.
@Prokerboss
@Prokerboss 2 года назад
Pathetic, I myself carry 5 bfg 10000s on my person at all times (I take 10 if I ever go outside)
@charlessmith8679
@charlessmith8679 2 года назад
Glad to know I'm not alone, but I also use thaad missile defense systems
@marvinthomas9897
@marvinthomas9897 2 года назад
'Murica. *happy tears*
@richardstraus4493
@richardstraus4493 3 года назад
Gerald R Ford: “Im unsinkable” Titanic 🚢 is typing...
@buehae1091
@buehae1091 3 года назад
Godzilla and Kong are typing....
@TRheraklesTR
@TRheraklesTR 5 лет назад
*Iceberg: "Hold my beer..."*
@dvan0914
@dvan0914 5 лет назад
LOL
@nadunwijesinghe965
@nadunwijesinghe965 5 лет назад
Hahahaha this should be in the top comments
@i-love-comountains3850
@i-love-comountains3850 5 лет назад
With the amount of firepower on that ship, let alone the entire battlegroup, surely it could break up a sizeable iceberg. I have a hunch the military may have already tested this prospect.
@TC-yp2bm
@TC-yp2bm 5 лет назад
@@i-love-comountains3850 r/whooooosh
@ceramite3692
@ceramite3692 5 лет назад
R/WOOOOOOOOSH
@darrenspohn8376
@darrenspohn8376 5 лет назад
So far, most unsinkable ships that have been made are sitting on the bottom of the ocean.
@RR-us2kp
@RR-us2kp 5 лет назад
Titanic was unsinkable. Sank on the first voyage
@MagicRabbit
@MagicRabbit 5 лет назад
So far, not a single carrier of the USA was sunk since 1942
@RR-us2kp
@RR-us2kp 5 лет назад
@@MagicRabbit That's because there are no wars against developed nations. America has yet to face a military like Chinese or Russian. All they fought in the recent past are 3rd world countries.
@EasyIn60Seconds
@EasyIn60Seconds 5 лет назад
@@RR-us2kp Are you even for real? Watch the clip from WW2 and borrow some sense.
@RR-us2kp
@RR-us2kp 5 лет назад
@@EasyIn60Seconds what are you talking about? We're talking about modern supercarriers here. How the hell does ww2 aircraft carriers matter here. Back then even US didn't have any supercarriers. Their aircraft carriers were the same size as others of the era. Do you have any idea about what we are talking?
@bowgamer1004
@bowgamer1004 3 года назад
Japanese: this is the most powerful battleship America:my name Jeff
@JohnAnderssonTV
@JohnAnderssonTV 3 года назад
Americans: It's unsinkable! Some Swede in a diesel submarine: *Wanna bet?*
@jaumeferrer4868
@jaumeferrer4868 3 года назад
Very underrated
@rodfel2001
@rodfel2001 3 года назад
Marvelous answer ... we're smarter than they think ...
@Callsign_Prophet
@Callsign_Prophet 2 года назад
@@rodfel2001 I don't think anyone intelligent doubts anybody else's intelligence.
@e.s.6275
@e.s.6275 2 года назад
Not a conventional diesel though! they run on a Stirling cycle principle, thus very quiet!
@rodfel2001
@rodfel2001 2 года назад
@@e.s.6275 Silence is gold in warfare ...
@qingruiscookery
@qingruiscookery 4 года назад
USS Gerald R Ford: I am unsinkable! *Titanic has joined the chat* *Bismarck has joined the chat* *Yamato has joined the chat* *Musashi has joined the chat* *HMS Hood has joined the chat*
@kaydenchan7093
@kaydenchan7093 3 года назад
*Costa Concordia has joined the chat*
@tacticallypanda4716
@tacticallypanda4716 3 года назад
Lol
@srymybad3548
@srymybad3548 3 года назад
The reason why the Bismarck and the Yamato sank was because of poor Damage Control training. The sailors onboard was not trained or equipped well enough to take on the tasks of damage control. Could an enemy damage a carrier, yes. Could an enemy sink it, very unlikely.
@bernardedwards8461
@bernardedwards8461 3 года назад
@@srymybad3548 The main reason that the Yamato was sunk, and its sister ship Musashi, was that they had no aircover. This would not apply to a carrier.
@srymybad3548
@srymybad3548 3 года назад
@@bernardedwards8461 You are expected to take damage in battle. How you recover is absolutely key!!
@pauln9415
@pauln9415 5 лет назад
"Unsinkable as some claim"..... Reminds me of something from history... Hope it has iceberg detection.
@chaoticwj1772
@chaoticwj1772 5 лет назад
Paul N modern Carriers could take a hit from an Iceberg. The double hull would protect it.
@bogustoast22none25
@bogustoast22none25 5 лет назад
I swear if an iceberg take a ship like this down I am losing it.
@stansbornak8116
@stansbornak8116 5 лет назад
Container ships are the US navy's mortal enemy
@wz5110
@wz5110 5 лет назад
Iceberg with a hydrogen bomb oof
@daigurenH
@daigurenH 5 лет назад
@@chaoticwj1772 What if its a double iceberg?
@pieman8937
@pieman8937 3 года назад
Japan’s kamakize pilot: Write that down!Write that down!
@timw5466
@timw5466 2 года назад
The survivability of any surface vessel predominantly depends on the bravery, and competence of the crew manning their stations.
@IsaacHoweiner
@IsaacHoweiner 3 года назад
People: Our ship is unsinkable! The ocean: Is that a challenge?
@kashiramgautam1182
@kashiramgautam1182 3 года назад
I will not ruin the balance I am a man of culture And also *NICE*
@buehae1091
@buehae1091 3 года назад
Godzilla and kong: yea right
@scifidino5022
@scifidino5022 3 года назад
Build the ship like 4 kilometers high. That way even when it "sinks" it's top will stay over water. Here, an unsinkable ship.
@e.s.6275
@e.s.6275 2 года назад
@@scifidino5022 if you sail near Philippines, which is not impossible during a conflict with China, you'll need to build like a 10km ship, to make it truly unsinkable.
@SUPERDRAGONE1969
@SUPERDRAGONE1969 2 года назад
you unlocked the titanic ending 13 ending remain to be discovered
@sharpshooter13ify
@sharpshooter13ify 4 года назад
Carrier: I’m unsinkable Anti ship missile: allow me to introduce myself and my cousins, the torpedo, the cruise missile and our distant cousin the iceberg .
@jaketang892
@jaketang892 4 года назад
Underrated 😂😂😂
@juanmiguelperalta772
@juanmiguelperalta772 4 года назад
@Leo Li nature: allow me to introduce myself and my cousins storms, typhoon and whirlpool
@harrisoncraig3915
@harrisoncraig3915 4 года назад
@@juanmiguelperalta772 america: allow me to introduce my reverse card and my distant cousin the block card.
@anusmcgee4150
@anusmcgee4150 4 года назад
@@harrisoncraig3915 *Trump card
@playaprods
@playaprods 4 года назад
One word: Nuke.
@CxDubxU
@CxDubxU 3 года назад
There's a reason we made space force. That's where the new "aircraft carriers" will be. Imagine being able to project power to 2-3 regions at a time using a single spacecraft. That will be what's coming. We won't know it's there
@jeremydyar7566
@jeremydyar7566 2 года назад
Lol that's not going to happen anytime soon if ever.
@CxDubxU
@CxDubxU 2 года назад
@@jeremydyar7566 I'm glad you know how to predict the future. Who's gonna win the super bowl next year?
@yequalsemexplusbee4322
@yequalsemexplusbee4322 Год назад
@@jeremydyar7566 in 2552 it will happen.
@brandondaughtry8708
@brandondaughtry8708 7 дней назад
I welded on this ship for 3 yrs.. pretty awesome seeing it all come together.
@mako8040
@mako8040 4 года назад
The 3rd ww be like: "Well NATO, you see, we have been watching The Infographics Show, so now you dead"
@bhartidesai3522
@bhartidesai3522 4 года назад
Mako u predicted it
@watermelonwelder3064
@watermelonwelder3064 4 года назад
Bruh we will wreck you with that carrier, and I don’t think that a aircraft carrier goes alone
@scottdenn5545
@scottdenn5545 3 года назад
Theres so many weapons (offense/defense) on that ship, that it could collapse any country all while defending itself. That ship is its own island carrying all the top technology, most isnt even advertised.
@Mister_Rat_
@Mister_Rat_ 3 года назад
TIS the best counter intelligence yt channel out there tbh
@laksamanasuhendra5868
@laksamanasuhendra5868 3 года назад
@@watermelonwelder3064 enemy: *attacks carrier* America: TIS BUT A SCRATCH
@soggycereal16
@soggycereal16 5 лет назад
This is how you get on the FBI's watchlist.
@MuchTooStress
@MuchTooStress 4 года назад
No this is how you get on the Department of Naval Intelligence “list”
@MrErgenta
@MrErgenta 4 года назад
That's the NSA's job
@karanmedhane835
@karanmedhane835 4 года назад
Jim Bob Lol
@1Learn2Swim3
@1Learn2Swim3 4 года назад
@Jim Bob hahaha you ain't lying man
@1Learn2Swim3
@1Learn2Swim3 4 года назад
@FBI 🥺🤔
@codybaker4719
@codybaker4719 2 года назад
The ability of the crew to perform effective damage control is a factor you neglected to consider. Every Sailor is a Damage Controlman. Even if a small boat attack successfully damaged the ship, the crew would likely seal off the all water tight doors, and shore the hull as best as possible. Thus, preventing the sinking for the ship.
@christopherg2347
@christopherg2347 3 года назад
There are a number of ways to sink them. The issue is that they follow the Pegniun Motto: "Never swim alone!"
@zerixor8134
@zerixor8134 4 года назад
*One swedish submarine boi:* *"Hold my torpedo"*
@PROJECTDARKPHOENIX
@PROJECTDARKPHOENIX 4 года назад
my point exactly
@skalmaa
@skalmaa 4 года назад
Was that the submarine that used a older type of machinery to move around? there for avoiding sonar by not making barely any sound at all
@implodingbaby
@implodingbaby 4 года назад
@@skalmaa the swedish sub used a Stirling engine to power it so it was ridiculously quiet.
@zoom5024
@zoom5024 4 года назад
@@implodingbaby still using em. And in 2021 they're getting the A26 model sub thats even quieter then the Gotland class.
@robertharris6092
@robertharris6092 4 года назад
And sweden gave them all the info neccisary to detect the thing and even sold america one of the subs to research.
@hundreadrides7730
@hundreadrides7730 5 лет назад
Gordon Ramsay's insults would sink it in seconds
@delightfulThoughs
@delightfulThoughs 5 лет назад
Yep..of Gordon Ramsay gets on board for a kitchen inspection will go out of order in no time..Lol
@thetruthhurts4054
@thetruthhurts4054 5 лет назад
Your face would kurdel milk.
@michaelh2013
@michaelh2013 5 лет назад
When you locate the lamb sauce in the USS Gerald Ford
@miguelcastillo9589
@miguelcastillo9589 5 лет назад
THIS SHIP ISN'T GOOD ENOUGHHH!!!! WHAT ARE YOU DOING YOU FUCKIN DONKEY!!!?? IT'S RAWWWW!!!!
@Silver09346
@Silver09346 5 лет назад
this ship is bland ! horrible..
@richardgreen1383
@richardgreen1383 9 дней назад
As to the comment that in 2006 a Chinese sub surfaced in the midst of a task force, and then states the that the task force did not know the sub was there. Just because the public statements said they did not know it was there because they were not actively looking for it, does not mean that they weren't looking. They are always looking. The sub was not considered hostile, so no action would have been taken, and let the other side think they got away with a PR gain. As one who flew ASW back in the late '60s, our air group had a technique that allowed us to detect and track a US Boomer. The only people we told about it was our own senior staff all the way up including the sub commands. I'm sure the subs are harder to detect these days and am equally sure detection techniques are better as well. We used to play games with our attack subs. This allow both sides to get better which is what war games are all about.
@reimuhakurei2208
@reimuhakurei2208 3 года назад
Great video, I liked the comparison to the Yamato
@mhazg6621
@mhazg6621 4 года назад
Bermuda Triangle: hold my 'megalodons'*
@1copperfly
@1copperfly 4 года назад
Nice comment.
@sixfiftylaloba1773
@sixfiftylaloba1773 4 года назад
Lol
@fka_the_body1542
@fka_the_body1542 4 года назад
Joker😏
@tnerbtnerb5136
@tnerbtnerb5136 5 лет назад
Some claim its unsinkable. Me: Is it a permanent land mass with firm attachments to the sea floor? No... Me: Then its sinkable.
@NocturnalRxinbows
@NocturnalRxinbows 5 лет назад
Strongest Earthquake Ever Recorded: Hold my beer
@minecartrider7057
@minecartrider7057 5 лет назад
Yo mom: hold my beer
@NocturnalRxinbows
@NocturnalRxinbows 5 лет назад
Category 5 Hurricane: Hold my beer
@spatsky
@spatsky 5 лет назад
tnerb tnerb But even firm attachments to the ground are sinkable.
@777Outrigger
@777Outrigger 5 лет назад
No one claims a carrier is unsinkable. Just very difficult to sink. Straw man argument.
@budgiecat9039
@budgiecat9039 3 года назад
What would it take to sink the Ford carrier? Godzilla and Kong standing on top of it fighting :p
@rexyjp1237
@rexyjp1237 3 года назад
And then atomic breath
@willymueller3278
@willymueller3278 Год назад
13 billions for one aircraft carrier, two billions for one stealth bomber and I have 20 bucks left for the rest of the month. 😂
@williammoore5277
@williammoore5277 Месяц назад
Well, obviously you'd better make do with the ships and aircraft you currently own
@pwrbyford68
@pwrbyford68 4 года назад
Navy vet here (Former FC stationed on a few carriers). Watch the documentary about sinking the USS Oriskany. They went through a lot of effort to ensure it sunk. 50 + years later, carriers are designed better to take more hits. During wartime there will always be a ship alongside a carrier. We were rarely left alone. They're too valuable to leave vulnerable like that.
@dadthelad
@dadthelad 2 года назад
Sure, but they weren't trying to sink it with missiles w nuclear war heads on them either! I somehow suspect a carrier couldn't survive one of those.
@pwrbyford68
@pwrbyford68 2 года назад
@@dadthelad Look up operation crossroads, they did nuclear bomb testing on/near ships in the 1940s. Many survived nuclear blasts, including a few aircraft carriers. The issue was the radioactive materials embedded into the ships hulls that sealed their fate.
@dawsonkozel4171
@dawsonkozel4171 Год назад
@@pwrbyford68 bet now aircraft carriers have sprinklers to wash off radio active particles and at bets they could survive 1 but 2 and it’s done when hit dead on
@dawsonkozel4171
@dawsonkozel4171 Год назад
@@dadthelad they did try miss,es, in fact they tried many conventnal weapons, also using a nuke would just cause even more escalation so it would be heavily unlikely
@raiderfandew
@raiderfandew Год назад
Modern day missiles have changed the game dramatically over what they had to deal with in WWII.
@moneyandtimefreedom3352
@moneyandtimefreedom3352 5 лет назад
STEP 1, TO SINK A SHIP: say it is unsinkable
@jano867
@jano867 5 лет назад
Titanic
@empiur
@empiur 5 лет назад
Ships used in nuclear tests are nearly never hit directly. In most cases, ships taking nuclear explosions in tests are from nearby to, not onto, the ship themselves. Any nuclear weapon used directly on a ship would definitely sink it.
@michaelquintana678
@michaelquintana678 5 лет назад
Moneyat F ya urs is the best one so far.. were not sinkable go back to bed..
@WilliamStewart1
@WilliamStewart1 5 лет назад
@@empiur A single nuclear missle wouldn't be able to sink it thanks to the onboard anti missle systems. You'd have to send a barrage and hope 1 sneaks through.
@korbingaming7669
@korbingaming7669 5 лет назад
Fun fact China has warships with high powered rail guns so rail guns can take it down
@spacecatboy2962
@spacecatboy2962 3 года назад
chinese ships might be alright as long as they dont say MADE IN CHINA
@uptowndunker6346
@uptowndunker6346 3 года назад
Lol
@spacecatboy2962
@spacecatboy2962 3 года назад
@@yuxiang9599 isnt the chinese carrier a boat they bought from russia or india and redid it
@the_ultra_robot6884
@the_ultra_robot6884 3 года назад
@@yuxiang9599 it's a joke
@raywhitehead730
@raywhitehead730 Год назад
One good fire set by a crew member.
@thecrazysunflower9360
@thecrazysunflower9360 5 лет назад
In Soviet Russia, Ship sinks Iceberg
@CP4884
@CP4884 5 лет назад
Fooddr dose viss smawl amedican bddaains, dees ees juk.
@wadopotato33
@wadopotato33 5 лет назад
You have to have functioning ships first.
@6421rich
@6421rich 5 лет назад
Crane sinks aircraft carrier
@user-dr2tw8fo8s
@user-dr2tw8fo8s 4 года назад
@@wadopotato33 they are more functional then French ones.
@CM-ve1bz
@CM-ve1bz 4 года назад
The Crazy Sunflower The Russians claim the Japanese surrendered in ww2 because of them, so sinking an iceberg should be a piece of cake.
@lordkarasu2263
@lordkarasu2263 4 года назад
“And none so more then The Yamato”. *bismark cries in the corner*
@jacknjayplayz6380
@jacknjayplayz6380 4 года назад
well i mean the bismarck was an amazing ship but i dont think it could compete with ther iowa or yamato class battleships
@Kelekky
@Kelekky 4 года назад
Jack n Jay playz it can Hood: yea i got killed in 1 salvo even tho i am the royal navy’s pride and joy
@Dreams_Of_You
@Dreams_Of_You 4 года назад
@@Kelekky its just a lucky shot it hits the ammunition locker which ignited the Hood and blew it into pieces
@Kelekky
@Kelekky 4 года назад
ZdeZ Animates it had a weak deck armor
@gabrielplays5115
@gabrielplays5115 4 года назад
@@Kelekky maybe it has a chance if it was a short to medium range battle... but if it was a long range battle i dont thinkit has a chance
@type93thunder
@type93thunder 3 года назад
“An aircraft carrier is poorly suited to defend against swarms of small attackers” I have one word: BRRRRRRT
@myke5696
@myke5696 2 года назад
Apparently there was a war game several years ago in which the US did lose a carrier in confined (Strait of Hormuz) waters due to a simulated swarm attack. I'm guessing we learned from that though.
@pam4840
@pam4840 3 года назад
I pray for a day when wars are fought as video games and the ones who loses the game practically defeated.
@cmshottie62
@cmshottie62 5 лет назад
The next super carrier will be the avengers flying ship
@kumarashispati2633
@kumarashispati2633 5 лет назад
Helicarrier
@cmshottie62
@cmshottie62 5 лет назад
@jason lu your kidding right? And I never said they lived in it
@brianfoster1504
@brianfoster1504 5 лет назад
Fun idea, but it is not feasible.
@Alex-ff1mk
@Alex-ff1mk 4 года назад
@@cmshottie62 sorry this is bit late but avengers don't have helicarriers but shield has them
@the_beanzer
@the_beanzer 4 года назад
maybe just ad 400 jet engines to the bodom the lift off
@amadeospapa5673
@amadeospapa5673 5 лет назад
Kim Jong Un's Weight: *"Hold my beer"*
@micha3ldc525
@micha3ldc525 5 лет назад
*Hold my cheese*
@solargamer7780
@solargamer7780 5 лет назад
“Hold my missiles”
@kevinbranch7855
@kevinbranch7855 5 лет назад
LOL !!! 😂😂😂
@darthslackus499
@darthslackus499 4 года назад
Hold my non-existence nuclear missiles I've keep saber rattling so the US and other countries would pony up some cash
@2silver144
@2silver144 4 года назад
XD
@guitarninjarick8179
@guitarninjarick8179 3 года назад
I would say fairly accurate breakdown. Is a super carrier vulnerable? Yes, however how vulnerable depends on the tactics used. The trick is don't put the carrier in a dangerous situation that u can avoid i.e. close to shore or within range of a lot of missiles. That may keep them out of operational range, but not necessarily out of range on navel containment of the enemy.
@Andrecio64
@Andrecio64 2 года назад
Short Answer: táctical nukes or a battleship like Yamato.
@chrisdugas1226
@chrisdugas1226 5 лет назад
First step to not getting your most expensive and powerful ship sunk : *DON'T CALL IT UNSINKABLE!*
@hrthrhs
@hrthrhs 5 лет назад
Yeah call it "totes sinkable the worst ship ever lol". THEN it will be unstoppable
@mhelbz_1017
@mhelbz_1017 5 лет назад
it is psychological
@nasimulnadim5269
@nasimulnadim5269 5 лет назад
Lol. It's a challenge to the world. (A stupid one).
@landrydorf9249
@landrydorf9249 5 лет назад
It’s like the titanic all over again
@calebmetix
@calebmetix 5 лет назад
A small Nuke anywhere near the fleet and the entire fleet sinks. Any submarine within the concussion ring pops like a grape. Missile boats are the future. Or better yet, stop getting into wars.
@robertorange6024
@robertorange6024 4 года назад
Carriers are incredibly tough to sink. Check out the Bikini Atoll nuclear tests. The USS Saratoga (CV-3) didnt sink when the first one went off. Also the USS Kitty Hawk was used as a test platform to see what it would take to sink a modern carrier. The Navy was surprised on how hard it was to sink her using missiles, bombs, and torpedoes. Are carriers indestructible? No. But they are very hard to sink successfully.
@susanchin4117
@susanchin4117 Год назад
I thought A Electromagnetic Railgun may be able to sink any aircraft carrier. The railgun will drill into the body of the carrier and explode inside. Unlike the torpedoes only damage the outer body of the carrier. That is my understanding. correct me if I am wrong.
@scotttild
@scotttild Год назад
@The Quiet Kid China is already pushing carriers further and further out because of their hypersonic weapons, carriers have no reasonable defense. Carriers are a total and utter waist of money. They are only useable in smaller regional conflicts with less sophisticated weapons. ie Gulf War. Even in that case we could have launched everything from SA and it most likely would have cost half as much.
@wallinollipekka
@wallinollipekka Год назад
You don't need sunk USS aircraft carrier to counter it's threat for long time.
@wizardtim8573
@wizardtim8573 Год назад
@@susanchin4117 I believe it depends on the torpedo. The older versions relied on delivering an explosive payload to the ship itself, but the new ones rely on blasting a cavity of water out from under them that can snap a large ship in half.
@susanchin4117
@susanchin4117 Год назад
@@wizardtim8573, Ohoo, that’s fantastic.
@chineseredneck1211
@chineseredneck1211 4 месяца назад
The aircraft carrier would only be vulnerable in certain theaters
@matthewgumabon7498
@matthewgumabon7498 3 года назад
Aircraft carriers are not like battleships. They are not meant to engage directly in combat. They are basically just mobile airbases. Carriers always travel in strike groups consisting of destroyers, cruisers, subs and other smaller vessels that surround the carrier. These escorts are responsible for naval attack and defense. The carrier is just the ride for the aircraft cover and acts as the strike group’s command center. As long as aircraft are essential in naval warfare, large carriers that can deploy and maintain a powerful air presence anywhere in the world will always be necessary.
@MrRescue100
@MrRescue100 5 лет назад
"Its Unsinkable" Iceberg: This is gonna be fun... again!
@kenneth9452
@kenneth9452 5 лет назад
Such a lack of imagination... NO crew on an air craft carrier would be stupid enough to sail a multi billion dollar ship into an ice berg
@marsyad6002
@marsyad6002 5 лет назад
@@kenneth9452 r/woooosh
@laffey.chan_
@laffey.chan_ 5 лет назад
Aircraft carrier are icebreakers
@zettour.
@zettour. 5 лет назад
@@laffey.chan_ literally lmak
@MrRescue100
@MrRescue100 5 лет назад
@@kenneth9452 Norwegian navy think nobody can be stupid enough to sail a multi million state of the art frigate against an oil tanker and guess what...
@brycereveling2091
@brycereveling2091 5 лет назад
Why do people say biggest ever built my man? Like do frogs build bigger ones tf?
@pinetree1616
@pinetree1616 5 лет назад
Haha
@arya31ful
@arya31ful 5 лет назад
Because no women ever make ship that big
@katieell4084
@katieell4084 5 лет назад
Well, there are 8 other planets in this solar system alone, each teeming with advanced civilizations. You can't assume the viewer knows you're talking about Earth.
@bucktoothbill5334
@bucktoothbill5334 5 лет назад
@@katieell4084 what? There is no evidence of alien life.
@katieell4084
@katieell4084 5 лет назад
@@bucktoothbill5334 I can't tell if you didn't get my joke or if you're bantering.
@Clayvids642
@Clayvids642 6 месяцев назад
Last summer I went to go see it it’s was so cool of you don’t count the time I hat my head
@Luffyxw
@Luffyxw 3 года назад
How to sink the USS Gerald China: WRITETHATDOWNWRITETHAT DOWN
@lenaoxton3999
@lenaoxton3999 5 лет назад
*[Enemies of the U.S. hastily adding this to their Watch Later playlist]*
@bethwilliams3148
@bethwilliams3148 5 лет назад
As if what he's saying is "classified". It's not. The enemy (whomever that maybe) already knows how it might be done - it's just having the cash, commitment, forces n technology to do it.. that takes out about 90% of possible threats.. n nothing is 100%. The Swedish diesel sub for example, can pre-emptively strike but with enough firepower in one hit? I'm not so sure - the carrier has many layers of redundancy to ameliorate against 2-3 good hits. It probably wouldn't sink, n then that sub would have to make it home.. unlikely, but possible.
@neontendou6826
@neontendou6826 5 лет назад
@@bethwilliams3148 he was making a joke rofl
@chooyongming110
@chooyongming110 5 лет назад
...and their allies
@bruhji1566
@bruhji1566 5 лет назад
the answer is... NEIN!!
@GlowingSpamraam
@GlowingSpamraam 5 лет назад
@@bethwilliams3148 6 nuclear torpedoes are not enough premtive firepower Even 6 modern torpedoes should cripple her beyond repair once that's over 6 more to secure the kill
@5t4n5
@5t4n5 3 года назад
According to the news, Covid 19 easily took out a US carrier battle group.
@madmadmal
@madmadmal 2 месяца назад
If it is a ship, by definition it is sinkable.
@cantfindikea9181
@cantfindikea9181 3 года назад
Man i love this series, i dont like documentaries but i like these idk y
@Selona1983
@Selona1983 4 года назад
"She's made of iron sir. I assure you she can, and she will" -- Thomas Andrews Titanic designer. Brilliant line
@Kelekky
@Kelekky 4 года назад
Swedish sub that sunk an american carrier in war games: *Hold my beer* every US carrier: why do i hear boss music
@barackobama8869
@barackobama8869 4 года назад
Craig 75 did they? Do you think that you could give some sources? I’m just curious:)
@barackobama8869
@barackobama8869 4 года назад
Craig 75 ok thanks
@mykincadult-store1219
@mykincadult-store1219 4 года назад
Sunk in war games, so they can counter it in real life scenarios. And yes of course if a major war broke out, we'd likely loose it. Propaganda, from both sides
@Jdalio5
@Jdalio5 4 года назад
You do know that was for pretend
@dundonrl
@dundonrl 3 года назад
During that same wargame, the ship I was on the USS Momsen DDG-92 "sunk" the HSwMS Gotlund before it was able to hit the USS Abraham Lincoln..
@colinjames7569
@colinjames7569 4 месяца назад
She is 100,000 tons of love and peace. Like a warm blanket. To protect our future generation. She was purposely built to defend. And when required, she can attack. Showing no mercy to her enemies
@GigaTrap6000
@GigaTrap6000 2 года назад
This man must love aircraft carriers
@AntiJihadi
@AntiJihadi 4 года назад
Japan be like -" We got Godzilla" Is your Aircraft carrier 'Nuclear radiation breath proof'?
@nicolasnewcomb8514
@nicolasnewcomb8514 4 года назад
Japan isnt either
@pakratmiz4487
@pakratmiz4487 4 года назад
Nicolas Newcomb fun fact: most carriers are nuclear powered so instead of Japan isn’t either, it should be “Japan isn’t”
@commiccannon592
@commiccannon592 4 года назад
Yes
@ethangarland5737
@ethangarland5737 4 года назад
Of course it is what kind of fools do you think we are besides we took care of Godzilla years ago he’s currently in chains being studied
@AntiJihadi
@AntiJihadi 4 года назад
@@ethangarland5737 Do u understand the word 'Joke'??? Ya that was what my comment was supposed to be....
@bjornours7656
@bjornours7656 5 лет назад
You just need a swedish submarin .
@ab6789
@ab6789 5 лет назад
I saw that video 😂😂 😂
@Username-jc1ut
@Username-jc1ut 5 лет назад
Dammit... the one weakness of the United States Navy.
@savage7882
@savage7882 5 лет назад
@@Username-jc1ut vikings...
@Username-jc1ut
@Username-jc1ut 5 лет назад
Piroclanidis no I am commenting on how during a practice drill/mock battle a Swedish submarine had “sunk” a us aircraft carrier.
@LosLS2
@LosLS2 5 лет назад
as I understand it, that was a few years back and we bought one of those subs or leased one . Pretty sure that's been figured out and been virtually sunk 100's of times.
@PapaShongo25
@PapaShongo25 2 года назад
“Zeus, our forces are being decimated by the Ford and we have nothing that can even get close to this thing. We must surrender” Zeus “No, RELEASE THE ICEBERG”
@noitcaerym
@noitcaerym 3 года назад
USS Gerald Ford: Sink me if you can! Swedish Submarine (AKA Gotland): Shut up!
@aperson9641
@aperson9641 4 года назад
Examples of unsinkable ships of history: Titanic: Hits some ice, sinks Bismarck: Gets overwhelmed, sinks USS Gerald Ford: ...
@spec-opsmexican4119
@spec-opsmexican4119 4 года назад
hms hood:one shotted by Bismarck
@Michael-bc3es
@Michael-bc3es 4 года назад
US gerald Ford, taken out with 30drones bought off wish fitted with home made c4
@nzk86384
@nzk86384 4 года назад
You forgot the Hood
@fightergobrrr9020
@fightergobrrr9020 4 года назад
USS GERALD R FORD:Bermuda Triangle..... Probably
@bambangsudirman6063
@bambangsudirman6063 4 года назад
Well at least it took a while for the bismarck to sink even under constant fire
@-recommended1289
@-recommended1289 5 лет назад
*Bermuda Triangle-* *“Hold my beer!”*
@dennisreilly5671
@dennisreilly5671 5 лет назад
copy paste
@Horizion
@Horizion 5 лет назад
Yambarr US loool
@Tom-mn3is
@Tom-mn3is 5 лет назад
Yambarr US, hilarious.
@rbrick3685
@rbrick3685 5 лет назад
You know the US Navy uses the Triangle... right?
@PROJECTDARKPHOENIX
@PROJECTDARKPHOENIX 4 года назад
why was this on my recommended lol
@ultrapersonplaysminecraft6031
@ultrapersonplaysminecraft6031 3 года назад
What would it take to sink a ship? Me: just call it unsinkable
@vannakchan
@vannakchan 3 года назад
when a ship is called unsinkable later then the ship sink
@VfletchS
@VfletchS 5 лет назад
WTF is a phalnax turret. It's "Phalanx", and CIWS stands for Close In Weapons System.
@carterchell4817
@carterchell4817 5 лет назад
Sea Pig cheezwizzz
@hobog
@hobog 5 лет назад
I love when CIWS engages in a battle in "the expanse"
@mariusj34
@mariusj34 5 лет назад
Wow..
@kevinroark4346
@kevinroark4346 5 лет назад
Hobo G agreed theyre awesome brrrt.
@MrAcerulez
@MrAcerulez 5 лет назад
Even if a missile gets through the defensive screen, a carrier is designed to take significant damage before sinking. Hell purposely sinking a carrier is a chore in of itself.
@MrGHOHLS
@MrGHOHLS 5 лет назад
You don't have to sink it just take out its landing deck then its just a normal boat
@romu_umu4681
@romu_umu4681 5 лет назад
Gustav Hohls if you can get near it. Carriers aren’t alone they’re always in a carrier group or fleet. They also have AA weapons so i doubt anythings getting close to them
@MrGHOHLS
@MrGHOHLS 5 лет назад
bastion missiles
@tylerreynolds4781
@tylerreynolds4781 5 лет назад
@@HNreport 13 years ago
@MrFlatage
@MrFlatage 5 лет назад
@tyler, 2015 RIMPAC a French 30+ ye old Saphir sinks the 2 escort subs, the theodore and 7 surface ships undetected remember? US carriers got sunk since they were built back then same as now. What is your argument? US carriers become invulnerable over time?
@mydogbullwinkle
@mydogbullwinkle Год назад
Great, now I know I'm on some watchlist somewhere!
@baska-
@baska- 7 месяцев назад
Correction, the Bismarck was the most feared ship during WW2.
@ColombianCaliph
@ColombianCaliph 5 лет назад
*Putin watches vid* Putin: ...huh
@keepsmiling5937
@keepsmiling5937 5 лет назад
How does he Wathes a video?
@Nick-mu1wp
@Nick-mu1wp 5 лет назад
@@keepsmiling5937 Jesus Christ xD
@HGAMING-ve6cw
@HGAMING-ve6cw 5 лет назад
Derpy Assassin ‘wathes’
@buffazzkangroo
@buffazzkangroo 5 лет назад
@Bernie Sanders russia is better
@oktaviowibisono8379
@oktaviowibisono8379 5 лет назад
Who the hell need an aircraftcarrier if the US have military base everywhere on earth
@ludvigask6027
@ludvigask6027 4 года назад
I mean, we Swedes did come with a diesel stirling electric powers sub and sank it in War games. Just saying
@Averagestoner
@Averagestoner 4 года назад
But it wasn’t a Ford class carrier :)
@ludvigask6027
@ludvigask6027 4 года назад
@El Draque Don't bully us. Or actually we are insane. I mean on big holidays, for example christmas, we eat rotten fish sooo
@se7en136
@se7en136 4 года назад
El Draque where did u get those stats
@Thedrek
@Thedrek 4 года назад
Norwegians did the same in an earlier war game, however the sub did not get away undetected, you did ;) Also there has been rumored that a conning tower of a russian sub appeared alongside a Nimitz-class and dissapeared again, this also was undetected until it surfaced.
@orbitalpotato9940
@orbitalpotato9940 4 года назад
@@Averagestoner close enough
@gary0073
@gary0073 2 года назад
Sinking a US Carrier would spell the end of that Nation.
@e.s.6275
@e.s.6275 2 года назад
Cmon, such sinking already happened in 1942, and guess what?
@buehae1091
@buehae1091 3 года назад
Godzilla and Kong: we already sank it 😒
@jhonnicdao2188
@jhonnicdao2188 4 года назад
USS Ford: I'm unsinkable RMS Titanic: Join me to the bottom of the ocean
@Ahad_Faisal
@Ahad_Faisal 5 лет назад
North Korea is watching this
@sampletext8076
@sampletext8076 5 лет назад
hmmm humblÈ lmao
@leogjolaj7394
@leogjolaj7394 5 лет назад
Lol
@pandac7190
@pandac7190 5 лет назад
they disliked on multiple accounts
@theotherguy6951
@theotherguy6951 5 лет назад
Well that doesn't matter since U.S. carriers are unsinkable to North Korea.
@theotherguy6951
@theotherguy6951 5 лет назад
But I'm talking about NK specifically
@jamesh950
@jamesh950 2 года назад
I am sure military planners are looking into ways to sink carrier or render it inoperable, and ways to counter it depending which side you are on.
@iliadnetfear2586
@iliadnetfear2586 Год назад
While many after action reports and modern historians will tell you otherwise, the US Navy was NOT out to sink the Yamato. It was a 1 day ceasefire in which America was helping test the Yamato's submarine capabilities. The test continue to be inconclusive, as it has yet to surface.
@sunnydaze429
@sunnydaze429 Год назад
Fake news
@danielduncan6806
@danielduncan6806 5 лет назад
Man has never made anything that cannot be destroyed. So, short story, yes, it can definitely be sunk.
@grizzlyrants37
@grizzlyrants37 5 лет назад
Daniel Duncan no it can’t be sunk by any ship or aircraft
@danielduncan6806
@danielduncan6806 5 лет назад
Hahahaha! HAHAHAHAHAHA! Perhaps you did not comprehend what I said. Maybe you do not know what "anything" means. Man has never made anything that cannot be destroyed, that is literal "anything", by the way. Do not fall into that stupid false sense of security. *NEVER* underestimate an opponent, *NEVER* . The fact that you think it cannot be sunk means that you don't really understand how weapons work. In a time of war a weapon will b e created to do exactly that, even if such a weapon does not exist today. Hell, they could just nuke it with that low flying missile they just showed off, or one of a similar design. One direct hit with a nuke and it is going to the depths, that is a guarantee. I know, you said; "no it can’t be sunk by any ship or aircraft", that is a cop-out and I won't let you get away with taking the easy way out.
@grizzlyrants37
@grizzlyrants37 5 лет назад
Daniel Duncan ok buddy where talking about today. And nothing can sink it that’s not a nuke and they would nuke it as it could result in America nuking other stuff like bases. And your proving my point because you couldn’t state anything besides a nuke. And your forgetting cyber warfare and spies. You think the US won’t know if an attack is coming
@benhayunga7886
@benhayunga7886 5 лет назад
The ocean is vast. No matter how big your fleet is, it can never be everywhere in the ocean at once. Sinking this ship would be easy. If a chinese ship popped up in the middle of a military drill without being detected, then saying "Yeah but in war" is a completely nonsense excuse. During many military war games, there ships are active as if they were "in war" swedish ships constantly sunk this carrier with no reprecussions, to the point that America leased the swedish subs to try and find ways to counter it. So yes, even today it can be destroyed. We can currently make water based drones. Water based kamikaze drones could totally sink this this ship easily. It really is becoming obsolete.
@irfan123100
@irfan123100 5 лет назад
It can be sunk but it would be really hard since carrier are usually always escorted by destroyers or cruisers. And they probably already know the enemy is coming from miles aways before even arriving.
@KevinATJumpWorks
@KevinATJumpWorks 5 лет назад
They always say it's unsinkable. Until it does sink.
@austria5892
@austria5892 3 года назад
USS Gerald Ford : I AM UNSINKABLE!!! Every Navies of the world: Lets set aside our differences first because we had an arrogant common enemy! Every ship that was nicknamed Unsinkable, Invisible, King of the Seas that was sank: You dare challenge me? * Ascends from the deep abyss of the oceans*
@Sora0502
@Sora0502 Год назад
US Navy: Ford carriers are impossible to sink Ice Berg: Hold my beer
@Bacteriophagebs
@Bacteriophagebs 5 лет назад
None of this analysis touched on what happens if the carrier gets hit. That's the crucial part of how sinkable a ship is. In war, nothing goes perfectly. A carrier WILL get hit if attacked enough. How thick is its armor above and below the waterline? How good is its comparmentalization to minimize fires or flooding? How well-protected are the ship's magazines? Apparently none of this matters, because the Ford-class carriers exist in a world of perfect military efficiency and can never be hit by anything, ever.
@bellmaster4088
@bellmaster4088 5 лет назад
Bacteriophagebs I think it was made to stop most projectiles, but US vehicles usally have very good armor
@thealmightyuntensil2368
@thealmightyuntensil2368 5 лет назад
That's what I though this was gonna be about lol, they didn't cover any of the important stuff lol
@slicric131
@slicric131 5 лет назад
Eric Brown this channel never does. I’m American a
@salyerbrandon
@salyerbrandon 5 лет назад
Hopefully we never have to find out.
@amnoahwielwabbit3837
@amnoahwielwabbit3837 5 лет назад
Beware of Stealth Oil Tankers and Commercial Shipping as USS Fitzgerald and John McCain found out to their Chagrin ! Chagrin = annoyance, distress, having failed, or been humiliated. Nowt but factual! Firing the REM launchers (as shown) firing “into the sky” when the attacking Cruise missiles are flying low defies logic !
@Holocaustica
@Holocaustica 4 года назад
Phalanx CIWS “FALNAX!?”
@anugrahshukla4933
@anugrahshukla4933 3 года назад
"Obsolete" was the word of the day for this video.
@friedabernasher4680
@friedabernasher4680 2 года назад
Carriers won’t be obsolete until airplanes are obsolete.
@jackromani6996
@jackromani6996 4 года назад
Swedish submarine: "hold my öl"
@mailbox3982
@mailbox3982 4 года назад
YA
@darkice4546
@darkice4546 4 года назад
Germans did that too. Submarines are veery scary
@zoom5024
@zoom5024 4 года назад
@@ollepol4491 it was this one.
@derricklanders1205
@derricklanders1205 4 года назад
@@ollepol4491 It didn't sink anything...and it was during a war game. In a real war those subs are running for their lives from US Hunter-Killer subs (and that's IF they make it out of port).
@moomar930
@moomar930 4 года назад
Hold my what?
@joshmartinez7888
@joshmartinez7888 5 лет назад
Summary of the video: You can sink it but it's really hard to do it
@JB-bm1to
@JB-bm1to 4 года назад
And here's how to do it 😂
@bq68972
@bq68972 4 года назад
Yes it can but i will not create a video of it. Its a secrete
@xplicitmike
@xplicitmike 4 года назад
Just launch 50 DF-26 missiles at her at once and at least one will land.
@thatsmadcrazy8953
@thatsmadcrazy8953 4 года назад
@@bq68972 stop acting like you know private information you're like 8 years old
@bq68972
@bq68972 4 года назад
@@thatsmadcrazy8953 you are idiot to believed on any videos here
@tysondennis1016
@tysondennis1016 3 года назад
I’ve got an idea for an anti-ship weapon: Lies on the seafloor, absorbing and pressurizing gases. Sinks ships via either remote control or some sort of sonar to trigger it, and when triggered, it rapidly releases the gases, reducing the density of the water and making any ship sink to its doom.
@cringyhuman3210
@cringyhuman3210 2 года назад
Well sea mines are already a thing
@Phoenix-oq2bu
@Phoenix-oq2bu 2 года назад
This is a good idea, however it would need to be massive in order to sink a ship the size of a aircraft carrier
@TheOnlyDragonGod
@TheOnlyDragonGod 2 года назад
Navy builds an almost indestructible ship People: name every weapon on earth and saying it could withstand them Me:black hole time
@watermirror
@watermirror 4 года назад
Supercarriers: "I'm invincible" Railguns: "looking forward to your EM shield"
@MrExade
@MrExade 5 лет назад
Didn't Sweden in a war game with the US sink the aircraftcarrier ? all that was needed was 1 submarine, it went past the whole battlegroup undetected
@TheHset
@TheHset 5 лет назад
Was thinking about the same thing.
@janwillem2656
@janwillem2656 5 лет назад
Yeah some country's claimed they did.. of course US is denying.. I think it's not possible that the major public is gonna know the truth.. but I don't think the USA is that great superpower as they claim to be. It's mostly propaganda and show off what they do..
@johanocampo5422
@johanocampo5422 5 лет назад
USA is a superpower lol everyone nation agrees
@peterkotara
@peterkotara 5 лет назад
It was a Swedish Gotland class submarine on lease to the U.S Navy. She managed to sink the USS Ronald Reagan in battle simulations.
@MrExade
@MrExade 5 лет назад
@@peterkotara lease? you mean americans faced americans in swedish submarine? (Confused)
@JoshWestbrook
@JoshWestbrook 3 года назад
“Let the truth be known, no ship is unsinkable.” - Thomas Andrews
@brucelee5576
@brucelee5576 7 месяцев назад
The problem with attacking a carrier fleet is the US has 11 carrier strike groups and 3-4 of them are always ready to go pay you back.
@user-td8bf2qw9q
@user-td8bf2qw9q 7 месяцев назад
That was kind of my thought. It seems like if anyone actually managed to do it, their next thought would have to be “Oh, f**k, what did we just do?!?”
@changchang2395
@changchang2395 4 года назад
uss gerald: im the strongest on the sea iceberg:am i a joke to you
@stanisse
@stanisse 3 года назад
Chang Chang if there was a ice berg it would get destroyed by the carrier battle group
@Aa-zp5kn
@Aa-zp5kn 3 года назад
They could litterally break any iceberg in half...some submarines even break through the artic ice when they surcface.
@danishkfd
@danishkfd 3 года назад
@@Aa-zp5kn its not like that bro subs are different than ships. It would cause damage to the carrier but not enough to sink it
@lucaszelaya710
@lucaszelaya710 5 лет назад
Hi I’m from Russia intelligence agency thank for information. Definitely subscribed.
@louisetim21
@louisetim21 5 лет назад
😂😂😂😂👎
@ashc4167
@ashc4167 5 лет назад
Lucas’s Junkyard loooool
@childofnewlight
@childofnewlight 5 лет назад
It's all publicly available unclassified info. Good to know Russian intelligence is only able to research via RU-vid.
@benhayunga7886
@benhayunga7886 5 лет назад
@childofnewlight r/WHOOOOOSH!
@babbintandukar9959
@babbintandukar9959 5 лет назад
Lmao
@callum9500
@callum9500 3 года назад
Everyones gangster until they hit an iceberg
Далее
50 Insane Fighter Jets Facts That Will Shock You!
14:40
The Uncertain Future of Nuclear Power
20:03
Просмотров 964 тыс.
How does a Tank work? (M1A2 Abrams)
9:49
Просмотров 52 млн
Living Underwater: How Submarines Work
12:13
Просмотров 10 млн
Why F-22 Raptor Still Reigns Supreme
10:12
Просмотров 2,5 млн
The WWII Flying Superfortress - B-29
12:15
Просмотров 3,9 млн
3 Nights Onboard US Navy's Largest Stealth Ship
19:52