Wallahi if there is one personality that has won over my heart dearly its our Nabi Rasoolullah pbuh. How calm and friendly his tone is. Gives me tears.
We as today muslims should ask ourselves how hard is it on my nafs to accept that what i have done is wrong and then ask for forgiveness. Many times it takes us years. MashaAllah this sahabah was very quick.
This incident is mentioned in the following sources but this sahabi wanted to hear what the women were talking about.. The title of this video is not respectful at all to the mighty rank of the Sahaba ... In any case refrejf Evan be found in the following books Al-Tabqaat-ul-Kubra, Vol. 3, pp. 362-364, Abdullah bin Zubair, Dar-ul-Kutb al-Ilimiyya, Beirut, 1990)
Brothers commenting, you shouldn't be making comments about authenticity this way. Alhamdulillah the story is true, but rigorous authentication is for legalities and worship. IF something isn't sahih, it doesn't mean it didn't happen. We have thousands of weak hadith that are likely accurate. And the ulema have always taken from them and used them. We also have recent "muhadditheen' who make serious mistakes in authentication, so internet research without knowledge can lead to falsities. Stick with traditional scholarship and fiqh. The Shaykh has knowledge and sanad from the Ba Alawi Alhamdulillah, this is itself a stamp of approval.
It is extremely important to give the source. Authentication is one of the major things in Islam we can't do without. Abdullah ibn al-mubaarak said: إن الإسناد من الدين، ولولا الإسناد لقال من شاء ما شاء The sanad (chain of transmission) is from the Deen. And had it not been for the sanad, then anyone could have said what ever they wanted. So if you say "Rasoolullaah Sallallaahu Alayhi Wa Sallam said" then there has got to be a source. Quiting Ahaadeeth with has a weakness in the sanad for Fadeelah is a different story. Even in Taareekh you need a source, otherwise anyone can just make up history, tell it to the younger generation who would in turn repeat that lie to their children.
We should ABSOLUTELY care about Authenticity if it's not for that then why did the compilers of hadith spent their entire lives dedicated to find the right hadeeth. And once they even rejected a hadeeth from a person who lied to donkey to lure the animal to come to him cuz that small thing of lying to an animal made him not a legible person
عن خوات بن جبير قال: نزلنا مع رسول الله -صلى الله عليه وسلم- مر الظهران، فخرجت من خبائي، فإذا أنا بنسوة يتحدثن؛ فأعجبنني، فرجعت فاستخرجت عيبتي، فاستخرجت منها حلة فلبستها، وجئت فجلست معهن. وخرج رسول الله -صلى الله عليه وسلم- من قبته فقال: أبا عبد الله، ما يجلسك معهن؟ فلما رأيت رسول الله -صلى الله عليه وسلم- هبته، واختلطت. قلت: يا رسول الله جمل لي شرد، وأنا أبتغي له قيدا، فمضى، واتبعته، فألقى رداءه ودخل الأراك، كأني أنظر إلى بياض متنه في خضرة الأراك، فقضى حاجته وتوضأ، فأقبل والماء يسيل من لحيته على صدره. فقال: أبا عبد الله ما فعل شراد جملك؟ ثم ارتحلنا، فجعل لا يلحقني في المسير إلا قال: السلام عليك يا أبا عبد الله، ما فعل شراد ذلك الجمل؟ فلما رأيت ذلك تعجلت إلى المدينة، واجتنبت المسجد، والمجالسة إلى النبي -صلى الله عليه وسلم-، فلما طال ذلك تحينت ساعة خلوة المسجد، فأتيت المسجد فقمت أصلي، وخرج رسول الله -صلى الله عليه وسلم- من بعض حجره، فجاء فصلى ركعتين خفيفتين، وطولت رجاء أن يذهب ويدعني، فقال: طول أبا عبد الله ما شئت أن تطول، فلست ذاهبا حتى تنصرف، فقلت في نفسي: والله لأعتذرن إلى رسول الله -صلى الله عليه وسلم-، ولأبرئن صدره، فلما انصرفت، قال: السلام عليك أبا عبد الله ما فعل شراد ذلك الجمل؟ فقلت: والذي بعثك بالحق ما شرد ذلك الجمل منذ أسلمت، فقال: رحمك الله (ثلاثا)، ثم لم يعد لشيء مما كان. وهذا الحديث أخرجه الطبراني كما ذكرت. قال الهيثمي: رواه الطبراني من طريقين، ورجال أحدهما رجال الصحيح، غير الجراح بن مخلد وهو ثقة. انتهى. وأورد هذه القصة بهذا السياق ابن الجوزي في المنتظم، وابن عساكر في تاريخ دمشق، والمزي في تهذيب الكمال، وابن حجر في الإصابة، وكلهم سكت عنها. وهذا الخبر يشتمل على طرف من حسن خلق النبي -صلوات الله عليه-، ولينه لأصحابه، ونهيه عن المنكر بالحكمة والموعظة الحسنة. ومن ثم، فلا نرى مانعا من حيث الأصل من التحديث بها. وقد عرفت ما قاله الهيثمي وهو من كبار المحدثين في سندها، وأن رجال الخبر رجال الصحيح، خلا راوية ثقة. والله أعلم.
The incident of the three companions who had no excuse to undertake that strenuous journey to Aqabah. Lying to the Prophet Muhammad SAW is not like lying to anyone else. Lying to the Prophet Muhammad SAW is ondeed a serious matter. This story is indeed strange and for the Prophet Muhammad SAW to repeat the " false camel event" is indeed very very strange. May Allah Most Merciful make us of those who show mercy to one another and be truthful.
Women only work in the company of other women in Islam. If a boss wishes to address his women employees he could do so briefly over a barrier if he fears Allah Though the matter of khawaat is different from a boss conversing with his employees
Two strange things in the story.. 1stly, a sahabi sitting with ladies ... 2ndly a sahabi not praying in masjid.. sahabis said they used to consider people who didn't pray a kafir, so even hypocrite knew they had to pray in masjid to escape being caught in their kufr
The shi’a do not wear white turbans and thobes, and they believe that every Sahabi apostated from Islam after Muhammad ﷺ passed away. The speaker cannot be a shi’i. He dresses like a Maliki tho so he may follow the Maliki madhhab
@@canyouhandlethetruth8682May Allah Azzawjal guide us to the Siratal Musthaqeem and make us from the people of Ahlul Sunnah wal jam’ah and protect us from trails and fitan of Misguided people and also protect us all from the harms of such . امين
@@canyouhandlethetruth8682 Albani came 8 centuries after bukhari and he is not immune to mistakes and in no position to classify aHadith already classified as either strong weak or fabricated by many muhhadithn before him I would take what he says about Hadith with a grain of salt
If you had intelligence you would have deduced the point of the story… that part about women was not even the main part…but don’t worry ur little head about it not everyone has common sense 😏…. And yeah this is my very less mean side I’m working towards there but stupids happen.
He is trying to teach us to lower our egos and to wish nothing but the best for others. Just because you found it to be classified as weak doesn't mean these events didn't take place in the life of rasool Allah sallalahu alaihi wa salim, we might not take legal rulings from this story, but we can catch glimpses of the character of Rasool Allah, peace be upon him. We should fill our hearts with love for the prophet rather than ill feelings towards the scholars.
@@saltymangoparty with so many saheeh hadith and ettiquette which is opposite of the weak and fake hadiths this is just a mockery wow so basically if the report was cut off and didnt even reach the prophet you claim it is from him lol the one who collected it said it was weak so what are you chatting it for? too make this fool look good? this is lying against the prophet lying against the sahaba claiming they were jokers and hanged with women this is a grave insult and lie. you are demonstrating blind following and exaggeration regarding this fool who claims his a mufti. couldnt he find saheeh correct hadiths or biography of the sahaba? learn your religion not being stupid
