When America Invaded Russia - 3D History DOCUMENTARY 

Shining, shimmering, splendid

Please kings and genrrals cover Nader shahs campain in 2021.

please say something kings and generals.

You are one of the best historical chenals kings and Generals! I hope you cover my country too!

It's almost surreal that your season 1 video of Mongol conquest became the most viewed on the channel.

@@JOJO-ig2jw Patreons and youtube sponsors can watch 1 day earlier

Naniiiii!!!

@UC8iIvVnAkTdrM9v33Bmh4Pw ima member brah, it’s pretty cool.

We went only there to lame their boars and eat their sheep

Wait until Russian Reds and Whites invade China.

Me too, I've never thought that it actually happened!! I wonder what else history hides for me to learn??!

@@deeipomar2366 Try this: 1. The furthest the Greeks have traveled was to Scandinavia. 2. Celts had sizable population in Egypt. They were first invited by Ptolomey II as bodyguards, but they soon settled with families. That means Egypt was at that time place where you could find Celts from Europe and Ethiopian merchants living side by side. 3. Muslim Spain was so well connected that they had plantations of rice. Emirate of Granada financed all their fortresses that Christians had hard time conquering by selling Silk to Italians on nearly an industrial scale. 4. Few Japanese visited Tenochtitlan that was now capital of New Spain and converted to Christianity. 5. Portugese tried to conquer a Sultanate in Somalia and they failed spectaculary. That same Sultante sold Chinese a Giraffe. 6. Sultan Ismail fathered over 1000 children, making him one of the most fertile men in history. 7. Mussolini suggested that, if Jews have to be transported and given home, it should be neither in Madagascar or Palestine, but in Beta Isreal (Ethiopia). 8. That same Wodrow Wilson would invade Mexico and occupy Velcrauz for a decade. This happened because Mexico accidently arrested American crew for smuggling goods. When they realised what they did, Mexico appologiest and offered reparation in return, to with America simply invaded. 9. USA and Soviet Union nearly gave up all the nuclear wepeons. That never happened because Regan was convinced his program Star Wars will succsed, which is arming of the space. It didn't happen for now.

Lol fun fact those same White Russians fought with the IJA during ww2

@@aleksapetrovic6519 Many thanks, I will further check them out!!

The frozen chosen.

The same......wow. I did not know that.

Indeed very hard-luck, they also fought in China together with the 4th Marine regiment.

That’s awful.

There a proud regiment and they take pride in the fact they went through all those things and still came back as a regiment

It wasn't enough

@@irongeneral7861 yeah, it was not meant to be enough, just enough to make a little theater.

@@irongeneral7861 It would never be enough. That's Soviet Power!

@abis8 alpha8 Are you insane??

@@fokkermollari Yeah, no mention of the real reason why the allies withdrew. That the soviets spread leaflets which caused the allied troops to mutiny. But the war was another heavy burden on the soviet people that was a big reason for the degeneration of the revolution under the stalinist bureaucracy

*A most powerful empire!*

The Greatest Since the Empire of Liechtenstein

While Poland was being taken by great Walrus empire with its supporters(mostly Seaguls and Sea Lions) Almost impossible as it sounds but true indeed.

Especially when you have only one single-track railway that all of the occupying powers had to fight over.

Russia when china could invaide siberia PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD DONT DO IT. WELL DO ANYTHING YOU WANT.

@@Newbmann Russia would just wipe china off the map if that would ever happen.

@@octaviantimisoreanu5810 . . . It also works in reverse with chinas recent nuclear buildup and I think russia would rather keep european russia habitable and lose siberia over taking china down with them.

@@octaviantimisoreanu5810 Cap

Communists do not deserve self determination

@@joevonnivega4224 might wanna cut down on that obvious anti-left stance... just saying

*insert edgy zoomer name* why would I? I absolutely hate leftism.

@@joevonnivega4224 it makes you look like a bitter berry that has an obvious vendetta against a set of people, which you totally appear to do. those kinds of people aren’t really appreciated in academic environments.

Wilson created the United Nations so he saved many more lives than he destroyed

Holy shit

Do you know how this flag ended up in the Chinese museum?

@@htrland Korean War

@@user-lg1bd7mi9g You mean the Chinese captured their flag after defeating them? Just to clarify

@@htrland Yes, nearly all of the regiment was destroyed

@@htrland yes, they got wiped out by the PVA in 1950

I had to watch adds read you. Put you in your place. This is hard work the video is just the reward

@Tolerant Leftist Is it

Better watch it before YT takes it down!

@Tolerant Leftist you clearly have no idea how much work it takes to make these kinds of videos..

I don't know about you but I see ads every few minutes. Even traditional TV is not this "free".

Hannibal B We are occupying fictional communist nations?

@Hannibal B China? Cause those guys are (and have) invaded Vietnam and Australia, economically and through their bases in the South China Sea. With no tough foreign policy team in the White House now, China and Russia will press up more and more.

@Hannibal B that's what communism looks like in the real world: a very rich upper clique profiteering off the system. In a country that contains 20% of the world population, that's a lot of billionaires. But they have been implementing more free market policies, as you say.

@Hannibal B Billionaires ≠ Capitalism

Well there was that one time when Japan invaded Alaska.

Tell that to the Poles, Ukrainians, Lithuanians, Tartars etc.

Guys...GUYS! Calm down and tear each other apart You're both terrible USA killed millions of civilians, so did Russia (ussr), so what's the point of arguing?

@@abdelkarim8381 that Russia never invaded the USA on the basis of fakely defending democracy

They don't choose to live in reservations, reservations is the only place where they are able to practice self rule, but the whole continent used to belong to them to practice such.

@@abdelkarim8381 "so did Russia (ussr)" - nice joke

Utterly bizarre seeing American and Japanese ground forces on the same side.

Mexicans Got on Boots faxist

ehh invasion is kind of a strong word since the country was in a civil war.

That's like saying China invaded South Korea in the Korean War or that Germany and Italy invaded Spain in 1939

@@chaosXP3RT tell that to the historian who named the video

Most people know nothing of history

Since the Bolsheviks were basically German agents at the start, it was more a low stakes low commitment continuation of WW1 than any serious effort to beat the Reds. So, in 1918 you had to intervene to put pressure on the East German Empire, then the Macedonian front collapses and there's peace, and now you're just kind of pissed at the Bolsheviks and since the British had spent the entire 19th century being rivals with Russia the idea of have a Russian puppet sounded nice. I get what you're saying, but I think this is significantly different from those other interventions in ways that makes comparison difficult at best.

@@simonmabee100 "Since the Bolsheviks were basically German agents at the start" Complete nonsense.

@Don't Trigger Me the german sent lenin back to russia but the bolsheviks is definitely not german agent

@Don't Trigger Me This means nothing. The Germans would need a form of control over Lenin after letting him go, which they had not. Therefore the Bolsheviks were not German agents, but Germany just knocked over the first domino piece.

@@AeneasGemini That only happened because Russia happened to boycott the UN at the worst possible time. It's absolutely hilarious.

Lot of propaganda in this video

@@tyroneemail Yeah but that one sentence was especially brazen. Some of the rest I can kinda forgive since obviously his main sources are the US military's claims about itself. But calling that "liberation" indicates a very advanced case of brainworms

Comrade here. I didn't find it strange. Its from american perspective in a military sense. "liberated" as in "cleared of hostiles". Not a case of propaganda imho, the opposite: the very existence of the video is proof of quite the absence of it, you would think anti-sovuet ideology would hide and deny being the invaders.

They're used to picking a side in another country's civil war and calling themselves liberators. It would be politically incorrect for anyone else to do the same.

You do realize it's 2020 and "liberated by the US" almost literally means "occupied" or "installed an authoritarian government"? It's basically a meme.

Throwing stones in a glass house, my friend. Like the Russian Soviets playing the world's greatest victim when invaded by the Nazis, but they're the same Nazis with whom the Russians jointly invaded Poland and divided it between them. Does the Katyn Forest ring a bell?

Your reply does not even connected to my comment, but okay I mean in video, actions of americans soldires (and not many other sides of conflicts) praized for no reason. Esspesialy considering that they are fighting waaaaay far from home on foreing land

@@Ymirson999 Soviets had a deal with Germans to partion Poland? - Yes Poland had a deal with Germans to divide Czecoslovakia? - Yes But, I guess, Poland of 1939 its not a yakie commies - they just are "friendly to Freedom" facist state, so its okay

@@illiakaliuzhnyi4438 It IS connected.. look, I don't mean to argue with you, there's no hard feelings on my end. I"m merely pointing out that we all tend to praise our home team even when they might not really deserve to be praised.

@@Ymirson999 you are right here but K&G were always neutral in their narratives, so it seemed strange to me. P.S. Anyway, they are my favorite history channel on RU-vid

Thank you, that was interesting. But... but... Russia signed a peace treaty with Germany on March 3 (!), 1918. Why didn't your brave soldiers just pack up and head straight back home? Why "getting involved"? It's called invasion, intervention, violation of independence or whatever, isn't it? Why couldn't they just be brave on their own land instead? I know it's the governments that are to blame. Those are rhetorical questions. I'm just sad.

Photoshop, Blender, Premiere Pro

@@KingsandGenerals That's seamless execution of the transition. Great production quality.

The great war or ww1

@@jerkizum2793 indeed

I just learned why the Cold War happened here in this video

@@Righteous1ist wait what are they teaching in school

@@jerkizum2793 Not American invasions lol

It's "when American invaded Russia" as an episode in the Cold War not "The American Invasion of Russia"

It's just great title and yes if I see another Japan-Russia war ot Czechoslovakia-Russia conflict it wouldn't surprise me so much but...man USA, Canada ..India woooow

You are the hero mate but not a fallen one

@@darthmalafathjunior388 I know the pain of wondering what a track is called and never finding it. So I do what I can to ensure others never experience it :)

Bolsheviks was busy fighting with Whites, anarchists, poles and others, so they had similar to Allies strength in Northern front with around 10 thousand men just to contain them and they hadn't communications with Siberian forces, there was just pro-bolshevik partisans. It's the reason of such low casualties from both sides

Lmao imagine defending bolsheviks

Bolsheviks are not representatives of the Russian State. No country recognized the Soviets as a state, similar to how we do not recognize Al Qaida as an "Afghan" state. It is just a terrorist organization.

@@bringbackmy90s But the Bolsheviks did become the representatives of Russia (obviously for a lot of people even to begin with), and you're crying about the country and every other one for recognizing it.

​@@tritium1998 So the Taliban did become representatives of Afghanistan, by your logic, and North Koreans representatives of the whole Korean Peninsula. A totally false assumption, even the bolsheviks never called their state officially "Russia" or a "successor-state" to any Russian state, as such thing was considered "Tsarist" and "reactionary". They regarded Russia just as a "place d'armes" / carrier for World Revolution and for their expansion into Central Europe, and only when that failed after being stopped in Warsaw, they had to settle for "Russia". Besides this video is about the early years, when nobody recognized the bandit and terrorist groups as a legit state, even Lenin admitted he had no control over all of them. So whatever you are crying about, it is not relevant for the period in this video. Soviets are not the same thing as "Russia", just as North Korea and South Korea are not successor states or anything like that.

@@bringbackmy90s Lmfao imagine if Russia came to "liberate" US towns

when your eyelids freeze to your eyeballs, then you know a Russian winter.

@@bunzeebear2973 don’t tell me this bullshit. I live in Russia.

It's special because they are brave Americans. Kind of men who would liberate Russian land from Russians. ROCK, FLAG AND EAGLE!

@@alexeyyyyyyyyyy Because this is a time before industrial heating. And fighting in below freezing temperature is much different than just living in it.

@@sunk5244 how do You think Russian settled the region? They had to fight. And they had to fight in winters as well. Without funny bear badges.

@@aze94 well depending on who held it I’d say it was liberation. It it was held by the communists that is but if by the White Russian army then no probably not

@@onehope6448 idk what NPCs your referring too but it depends on who controlled it. It’s called war cities get taken. We liberated France from nazi Germany in WW2 because it was oppressed and under control by a foreign and evil host. Same with communism. Communists controlled it and we liberated them from a not good government but in the end we pulled out and they got it anyway but the liberation part just depends on who your taking it from and how bad they are so no it still counts as liberation

@@onehope6448 yeah sure buddy. Because it was an example of liberation something occupied by a hostile force. I didn’t say it was ok we got involved but just because the communists were also Russians doesn’t mean that they weren’t following a bad and dangerous ideology that needed to be stopped if possible like the nazis. Like in the American civil war we fought against our own but what they were fighting for was wrong so it was about who controlled certain areas not what country they belonged too.

@@onehope6448 no your just an anti-American conspiracy theorist. We were fighting to help the better Russian ideology win so they could stay in power. We didn’t want to rule Russia there’s no way we could have kept control of that. That’s insane. And we didn’t conquer the south we beat it in a war they started. It’s part of one country not a foreign land we conquered. I’ve studied history most of my life and believe me we did do lots of wrong expansion. After the Spanish American war we took the Philippines which was wrong and we expanded west and broke treaties with the native Americans. I know we did wrong and expanded when we shouldn’t have but the civil war and the Russian revolution just wasn’t one of them

@@tsdocholiday8965 "We were fighting to help the better Russian ideology" Which was?

Early Rus!

It'd be great because it's so strange when polish people complain about soviet agression in 1939, but they can say nothing when Polish-Russian war 1920 being mentioned

@@ezekielprophet6016 1 word Pilsudski.

@@ezekielprophet6016 Or the Polish-Lithuanian War.

And then some Polish guy brought them to their knees and their entire empire crumbled.

@@111mmgg if you are talking about war against Poland, that is because they were fighting like 25 other countries at the same time.

Carl Anderson That’s because Stalin and Trotsky pushed to basically invade back everyone on their borders at like the same time. Ukraine, the Caucasus, and Finland (the white guard there managed to win out in a particularly confusing civil war inside a civil war).

@UCj5lZ5R1QwHwm03yribAa_w "The Bolsheviks were a united" they were left-wing armies that also had conflicted interest and later fought against the Bolsheviks. Bolsheviks were just better at talking and recruiting common people, them having initial control over Western Russia helped too.

@@keemstarkreamstar7069 Yep, at first Bolsheviks gave up terries in Brest-Litovsk later, they invaded the said territories, they just wanted some challenge i guess.