@@user-id1zo2bl6h 1. Yes Quran is preserved primarily by recitation in 7 ahruf w/ 1 main one & it's the only one used when non Arabs joined Islam as the would confuse the differences due to not knowing Arabic. Unlike bibIe which has thousands of versions, 95 % earliest manuscripts is in 9th century after Quran.
I noticed something, that Wood's arguments are "the Qur'an have this" and "the Qur'an said that" but he didn't say anything of contradictions or falsehood in the Qur'an, he's only mocking whats in the Qur'an that he don't understand clearly and at the same time his bible have way more worst things and full of contradictions, his intentions are super clear, may Allah guide us all
The contradiction are in the Quran Once God created earth then sky Another sky then earth Once God created the universe in 6 days Another 2, 4 and 2 Which means 8 Which is correct 6 or 8 Embryo formed from bones Where does bones come from Not to mention Virgin Mary is sister of Moses though he is older than her by 1300 years Plus dozens of mistakes in grammar
There are four Arabic words, which could lead to submission of the entire world to Islam, if non-Muslims do not fully understand their meaning and implications. Those words are takiyya, tawriya, kitman, and muruna. Each of these words describes a different style of deception used by Muslims when discussing Islam or their activities as Muslims. Muhammad famously said, “War is deceit.” (Bukhari, Vol. 4, Book 52, Number 268) The Quran boasts that Allah is the “master of all scheming” (Surah 13:42) and that he is “profound in his machinations” (Surah 8:30). Western civilizations are not accustomed to dealing with people, who have developed deception into an art form. Knowledge is power, and the best way to combat the Islamist agenda is to say, “We are wise to your shenanigans. Knock it off!” Takiyya Takiyya is defined as dissimulation about ones Muslim identity. It comes from the verse in the Quran that says, “Let believers not make friends with infidels in preference to the faithful - he that does has nothing to hope for from Allah - except in self-defense (illaa an-tattaqu minhum tuqah) (Surah 3:28). This “self-defense” justifies dissimulation. Islamic Sharia Law provides, “When it is possible to achieve an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible, and lying is obligatory if the goal is obligatory.” (Reliance of the Traveler, Para r8.2) Examples include lying to protect Islam or a Muslim. Tawriya Tawriya is defined as concealing, and it could be called “creative lying”. It is OK to break the intent of the oath, as long as you don’t break the letter of the oath. (Reliance of the Traveler, sections o19.1 and o19.5) How does this work? Suppose someone protests that Surah 1 of the Quran demeans Christians and Jews, because it is a supplication Muslims make to Allah seventeen times a day to keep them from the path of “those with whom God is angry” and “those who have lost their way”. A Muslim might respond, “Surah 1 never mentions Jews or Christians.” He is practicing tawriya, because while Surah 1 does not mention Jews and Christians by name, but he knows full-well that the words “those” refer to Jews and Christians. Another example would be when a Muslim responds to your greeting of “Merry Christmas!” He might say, “I wish you the best.” In your mind, you think he has returned a Christmas greeting. In actuality, he has expressed his wish for you to convert to Islam; he wishes the best for you which, in his view, is becoming a Muslim. Kitman Kitman is characterized by someone telling only part of the truth. The most common example of this is when a Muslim says that jihad really refers to an internal, spiritual struggle. He is not telling “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”, as witnesses are sworn to do in U.S. courts. Often, kitman results in a gross distortion of the truth. In the example given, the Quran uses jihad and its derivatives 59 times. Of those, only 16 (27%) could be considered “internal” with no object as the target of the struggle based on the context of the surah. Another common form of kitman is to quote only the few peaceful passages from the Quran, knowing full-well that that passage was later abrogated by a more militant, contradictory verse. Here is an example: “There is no compulsion in religion” (Surah 2:256) Early Medina “Are they seeking a religion other than Allah’s, when every soul in the heavens and earth has submitted to Him, willingly or by compulsion?” (Surah 3:83 Later Medina) Another example: “Permission to take up arms is hereby given to those who are attacked, because they have been wronged.” (Surah 22:39) Late Mecca “When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them and lie in ambush everywhere for them.” (Surah 9:5) Late Medina Muruna Muruna means using “flexibility” to blend in with the enemy or the surroundings. The justification for this kind of deception is a somewhat bizarre interpretation of Surah 2:106, which says, “If we abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten, We will replace it by a better one or similar.” Thus, Muslims may forget some of the commands in the Quran, as long as they are pursuing a better command. Muslims striving to advance Islam, therefore, can deviate from their Islamic laws in order to cause non-Muslims to lower their guard and place their trust in their Muslim counterpart. At times, Muslims practice muruna in the same way a chameleon changes colors to avoid detection. Muslims will sometimes shave off their beards, wear western clothing, or even drink alcohol to blend in with non-Muslims. Nothing is more valuable these days to the Islamists than a blue-eyed Caucasian Muslim willing to engage in terrorism. Another common way of using muruna is for a Muslim to marry a non-Muslim or to behave like a non-Muslim so their true agenda will not be suspected. The 9/11 hijackers visited strip clubs and bars during their off-times while taking classes in the U.S. to fly airplanes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the White House. Many Americans believe Hillary Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin, married Jewish Congressman Anthony Weiner at least in part to burnish her security credentials so she could infiltrate the highest levels of the Administration. The implications of these highly-honed tactics of deception could be enormous for unassuming Western societies. Twenty years ago, psychologist Paul Ekman wrote an insightful book, “Telling Lies”, which demonstrated that people give off recognizable clues when they are practicing deceit. Their consciences cause them, involuntarily, to sweat or raise their voices or make other recognizable gestures. However, Dr. Ekman’s research was exclusively with people from Western cultures. Muslims, on the other hand, show no discernible signs when they are being deceitful because there is no feeling of guilt. In their minds they are doing exactly what Allah wants them to do to advance Islam. Because any Western person who has raised children knows almost intuitively when someone is lying, so they assume they can do that in all cases. Unfortunately, those same Western people can be easily duped by Islamic deceit because there are no tell-tale signs in the deceiver. Hopefully, this article will be a wake-up call to the unsuspecting infidels. Trust but verify - as was an old American strategy in dealing with potentially hostile parties - is the way to go in dealing with Islamists.
In Quran which created first Earth or sky? How many days were the universe created 6 or 8? In embryo development which first bones ? Do you know that embryo development was discovered 123 A Dby Galeen So the prophet copy it All your book copy and paste
A little knowledge is dangerous, it’s more dangerous when you think you have the knowledge or you claim to have the knowledge when you yourself know for sure that you don’t have it. May Allah save me, my family and all true Muslims, Ameen!
There are four Arabic words, which could lead to submission of the entire world to Islam, if non-Muslims do not fully understand their meaning and implications. Those words are takiyya, tawriya, kitman, and muruna. Each of these words describes a different style of deception used by Muslims when discussing Islam or their activities as Muslims. Muhammad famously said, “War is deceit.” (Bukhari, Vol. 4, Book 52, Number 268) The Quran boasts that Allah is the “master of all scheming” (Surah 13:42) and that he is “profound in his machinations” (Surah 8:30). Western civilizations are not accustomed to dealing with people, who have developed deception into an art form. Knowledge is power, and the best way to combat the Islamist agenda is to say, “We are wise to your shenanigans. Knock it off!” Takiyya Takiyya is defined as dissimulation about ones Muslim identity. It comes from the verse in the Quran that says, “Let believers not make friends with infidels in preference to the faithful - he that does has nothing to hope for from Allah - except in self-defense (illaa an-tattaqu minhum tuqah) (Surah 3:28). This “self-defense” justifies dissimulation. Islamic Sharia Law provides, “When it is possible to achieve an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible, and lying is obligatory if the goal is obligatory.” (Reliance of the Traveler, Para r8.2) Examples include lying to protect Islam or a Muslim. Tawriya Tawriya is defined as concealing, and it could be called “creative lying”. It is OK to break the intent of the oath, as long as you don’t break the letter of the oath. (Reliance of the Traveler, sections o19.1 and o19.5) How does this work? Suppose someone protests that Surah 1 of the Quran demeans Christians and Jews, because it is a supplication Muslims make to Allah seventeen times a day to keep them from the path of “those with whom God is angry” and “those who have lost their way”. A Muslim might respond, “Surah 1 never mentions Jews or Christians.” He is practicing tawriya, because while Surah 1 does not mention Jews and Christians by name, but he knows full-well that the words “those” refer to Jews and Christians. Another example would be when a Muslim responds to your greeting of “Merry Christmas!” He might say, “I wish you the best.” In your mind, you think he has returned a Christmas greeting. In actuality, he has expressed his wish for you to convert to Islam; he wishes the best for you which, in his view, is becoming a Muslim. Kitman Kitman is characterized by someone telling only part of the truth. The most common example of this is when a Muslim says that jihad really refers to an internal, spiritual struggle. He is not telling “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”, as witnesses are sworn to do in U.S. courts. Often, kitman results in a gross distortion of the truth. In the example given, the Quran uses jihad and its derivatives 59 times. Of those, only 16 (27%) could be considered “internal” with no object as the target of the struggle based on the context of the surah. Another common form of kitman is to quote only the few peaceful passages from the Quran, knowing full-well that that passage was later abrogated by a more militant, contradictory verse. Here is an example: “There is no compulsion in religion” (Surah 2:256) Early Medina “Are they seeking a religion other than Allah’s, when every soul in the heavens and earth has submitted to Him, willingly or by compulsion?” (Surah 3:83 Later Medina) Another example: “Permission to take up arms is hereby given to those who are attacked, because they have been wronged.” (Surah 22:39) Late Mecca “When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them and lie in ambush everywhere for them.” (Surah 9:5) Late Medina Muruna Muruna means using “flexibility” to blend in with the enemy or the surroundings. The justification for this kind of deception is a somewhat bizarre interpretation of Surah 2:106, which says, “If we abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten, We will replace it by a better one or similar.” Thus, Muslims may forget some of the commands in the Quran, as long as they are pursuing a better command. Muslims striving to advance Islam, therefore, can deviate from their Islamic laws in order to cause non-Muslims to lower their guard and place their trust in their Muslim counterpart. At times, Muslims practice muruna in the same way a chameleon changes colors to avoid detection. Muslims will sometimes shave off their beards, wear western clothing, or even drink alcohol to blend in with non-Muslims. Nothing is more valuable these days to the Islamists than a blue-eyed Caucasian Muslim willing to engage in terrorism. Another common way of using muruna is for a Muslim to marry a non-Muslim or to behave like a non-Muslim so their true agenda will not be suspected. The 9/11 hijackers visited strip clubs and bars during their off-times while taking classes in the U.S. to fly airplanes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the White House. Many Americans believe Hillary Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin, married Jewish Congressman Anthony Weiner at least in part to burnish her security credentials so she could infiltrate the highest levels of the Administration. The implications of these highly-honed tactics of deception could be enormous for unassuming Western societies. Twenty years ago, psychologist Paul Ekman wrote an insightful book, “Telling Lies”, which demonstrated that people give off recognizable clues when they are practicing deceit. Their consciences cause them, involuntarily, to sweat or raise their voices or make other recognizable gestures. However, Dr. Ekman’s research was exclusively with people from Western cultures. Muslims, on the other hand, show no discernible signs when they are being deceitful because there is no feeling of guilt. In their minds they are doing exactly what Allah wants them to do to advance Islam. Because any Western person who has raised children knows almost intuitively when someone is lying, so they assume they can do that in all cases. Unfortunately, those same Western people can be easily duped by Islamic deceit because there are no tell-tale signs in the deceiver. Hopefully, this article will be a wake-up call to the unsuspecting infidels. Trust but verify - as was an old American strategy in dealing with potentially hostile parties - is the way to go in dealing with Islamists.
Let us give some credit to David Wood for being so ignorant that he made Hijab's task so easy that Hijab got some time to recite those amazing verses. I really feel for our brother and sisters in Christian faith because they are good people with distorted messages, and may Allah guide them to the straight path.
😂😂😂😂😂David Wood and his friends have tried for years to discredit and disrespect the Quran and every single time they were disgraced and humiliated yet they don't give up shame 😂😂😂😂
Wood unfortunately made a total fool of himself because he tried to rely on his rudimentary knowledge of Arabic and he got totally buried. Qoranic interpretation is difficult enough for the highest Arabic language scholars and when a novice like Wood tries to have a go he makes an ass of himself. I say deservedly so
this is one of the reason why Jesus prevented his disciples from sharing his message to non Israelites. They can't comprehend the language itself. And indeed, the language which Jesus spoke with, was much harder and would be easily misunderstood by non Jews. While the language is Qur'an, and arabic, may not as ambigue as Aramaic, it still has the same roots, and often talk in figuratively. When us, Indonesian muslim kids, learned that Al-Fatihah is the mother of Qur'a, we never asked who is the father, or how was it be in labor to deliver Qur'an like a real human mother to her children. We immediately know it is a figureative, just like how we often use "mother earth" (ibu pertiwi) in our daily use. And we've already understood this even we still a kid. I believe David Wood can understand it too. He is too smart for me to act this stupid. Or perhaps, it's his heart which is blind.
It is sad to see David Wood who knows nothing about Islam. It's only a true Believer, understand Islam compared to a non believer. David makes a fool off himself every time he speaks.
There are four Arabic words, which could lead to submission of the entire world to Islam, if non-Muslims do not fully understand their meaning and implications. Those words are takiyya, tawriya, kitman, and muruna. Each of these words describes a different style of deception used by Muslims when discussing Islam or their activities as Muslims. Muhammad famously said, “War is deceit.” (Bukhari, Vol. 4, Book 52, Number 268) The Quran boasts that Allah is the “master of all scheming” (Surah 13:42) and that he is “profound in his machinations” (Surah 8:30). Western civilizations are not accustomed to dealing with people, who have developed deception into an art form. Knowledge is power, and the best way to combat the Islamist agenda is to say, “We are wise to your shenanigans. Knock it off!” Takiyya Takiyya is defined as dissimulation about ones Muslim identity. It comes from the verse in the Quran that says, “Let believers not make friends with infidels in preference to the faithful - he that does has nothing to hope for from Allah - except in self-defense (illaa an-tattaqu minhum tuqah) (Surah 3:28). This “self-defense” justifies dissimulation. Islamic Sharia Law provides, “When it is possible to achieve an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible, and lying is obligatory if the goal is obligatory.” (Reliance of the Traveler, Para r8.2) Examples include lying to protect Islam or a Muslim. Tawriya Tawriya is defined as concealing, and it could be called “creative lying”. It is OK to break the intent of the oath, as long as you don’t break the letter of the oath. (Reliance of the Traveler, sections o19.1 and o19.5) How does this work? Suppose someone protests that Surah 1 of the Quran demeans Christians and Jews, because it is a supplication Muslims make to Allah seventeen times a day to keep them from the path of “those with whom God is angry” and “those who have lost their way”. A Muslim might respond, “Surah 1 never mentions Jews or Christians.” He is practicing tawriya, because while Surah 1 does not mention Jews and Christians by name, but he knows full-well that the words “those” refer to Jews and Christians. Another example would be when a Muslim responds to your greeting of “Merry Christmas!” He might say, “I wish you the best.” In your mind, you think he has returned a Christmas greeting. In actuality, he has expressed his wish for you to convert to Islam; he wishes the best for you which, in his view, is becoming a Muslim. Kitman Kitman is characterized by someone telling only part of the truth. The most common example of this is when a Muslim says that jihad really refers to an internal, spiritual struggle. He is not telling “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”, as witnesses are sworn to do in U.S. courts. Often, kitman results in a gross distortion of the truth. In the example given, the Quran uses jihad and its derivatives 59 times. Of those, only 16 (27%) could be considered “internal” with no object as the target of the struggle based on the context of the surah. Another common form of kitman is to quote only the few peaceful passages from the Quran, knowing full-well that that passage was later abrogated by a more militant, contradictory verse. Here is an example: “There is no compulsion in religion” (Surah 2:256) Early Medina “Are they seeking a religion other than Allah’s, when every soul in the heavens and earth has submitted to Him, willingly or by compulsion?” (Surah 3:83 Later Medina) Another example: “Permission to take up arms is hereby given to those who are attacked, because they have been wronged.” (Surah 22:39) Late Mecca “When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them and lie in ambush everywhere for them.” (Surah 9:5) Late Medina Muruna Muruna means using “flexibility” to blend in with the enemy or the surroundings. The justification for this kind of deception is a somewhat bizarre interpretation of Surah 2:106, which says, “If we abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten, We will replace it by a better one or similar.” Thus, Muslims may forget some of the commands in the Quran, as long as they are pursuing a better command. Muslims striving to advance Islam, therefore, can deviate from their Islamic laws in order to cause non-Muslims to lower their guard and place their trust in their Muslim counterpart. At times, Muslims practice muruna in the same way a chameleon changes colors to avoid detection. Muslims will sometimes shave off their beards, wear western clothing, or even drink alcohol to blend in with non-Muslims. Nothing is more valuable these days to the Islamists than a blue-eyed Caucasian Muslim willing to engage in terrorism. Another common way of using muruna is for a Muslim to marry a non-Muslim or to behave like a non-Muslim so their true agenda will not be suspected. The 9/11 hijackers visited strip clubs and bars during their off-times while taking classes in the U.S. to fly airplanes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the White House. Many Americans believe Hillary Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin, married Jewish Congressman Anthony Weiner at least in part to burnish her security credentials so she could infiltrate the highest levels of the Administration. The implications of these highly-honed tactics of deception could be enormous for unassuming Western societies. Twenty years ago, psychologist Paul Ekman wrote an insightful book, “Telling Lies”, which demonstrated that people give off recognizable clues when they are practicing deceit. Their consciences cause them, involuntarily, to sweat or raise their voices or make other recognizable gestures. However, Dr. Ekman’s research was exclusively with people from Western cultures. Muslims, on the other hand, show no discernible signs when they are being deceitful because there is no feeling of guilt. In their minds they are doing exactly what Allah wants them to do to advance Islam. Because any Western person who has raised children knows almost intuitively when someone is lying, so they assume they can do that in all cases. Unfortunately, those same Western people can be easily duped by Islamic deceit because there are no tell-tale signs in the deceiver. Hopefully, this article will be a wake-up call to the unsuspecting infidels. Trust but verify - as was an old American strategy in dealing with potentially hostile parties - is the way to go in dealing with Islamists.
I don’t think he would but yet another reason for you to wish death upon someone we all know what you do to gays and trans people just as much as someone who doesn’t believe in evil Allah
@@AmalShukup Who is CURSED in the Bible? = JESUS pbuh Who is CURSED in the QUR’AN? = SATAN Who is PRAISED in the QUR’AN? = JESUS pbuh Who requires BLOOD and a HUMAN SACRIFICE for forgiveness? = PAGANS Who requires the MERCY from their ALMIGHTY CREATOR ALLAH SWT for forgiveness? = MUSLIMS *ALLAH HU AKBAR* ❤️🕋❤️
@@keviselcli4487 Yet you believe that God who by definition is alone and eternal have a son, wrestled with a man on earth and lost, converted himself in bleeding human with flesh and died on cross, also came to Abraham as a person, and is actually 3 in 1. Dont talk about fairytales bro you might lack knowledge you're jsut here to bark but I can give you loads of these fairy tales from your book(s).
As a Muslim I have never felt the need to tell someone that Islam is the truth cos I’m not insecure bout it like the man worshipers. I expect you to know that automatically When you realise 3in1 makes 0 sense but worshiping 1 God alone does.
9:50 Assalamu Alaika aihannabiu -- yes, it means "peace be upon you o prophet," but there is more to it. Muslims also add "Assalamu Alaina wa Ala ibadillahis salalehin".
The way he shout "hiw can a BOOK...?" reminded of that scene in the Lessage movie in habasha. The Quran serving as a protection to the faithful on the day of resurrection us literally a given. I don't see how someone would read this and find it confusing
@@MuhammadAhmad-jb6ur no, the hell is where it all leads to. Jesus is the only way. The real Jesus. Not the counterfeit version of Islam. And to your question. Tell us which Islam you follow.
@@Skyscraper21stop preaching and answer my question and there is only one islam i have seen and heard bishops always saying jesus is love this love that love yeah but tyen he created hell fire no problem , even your bible contradicts your belief by saying only the cursed are crucified
I love Br.Muhammed Hijab, he is straight foward person and he is not a coward mashaa Allah. The qiraa was soo beautiful and I know it touched most Christians even before them hearing the translation. Alhamdulillah for Islam!. ❤
He thinks that he is mocking Islam, but he is guiding his own people to Islam. May he be one of them, and in the meantime and between time, protect the believers.
Hijab is knowledgeable but I have say that the way he responded is not an Islamic way, brother need to have more alhlaq I mean Bette akhlaq.. we know David woods is incompetent and very weak.
In my opinion, unfortunately this was an example of ego creeping in to what should have been an inspirational and educational dialogue between two people. Although Wood was clearly incorrect, there was really no need to go down the route of humiliating him. This isn't the Prophetic way of dawah, nor is it dignified. To educate should be from a place of love and wanting good for mankind. Whilst Hijab was factually correct in everything he said, it just doesn't sit well with me the way he conducted himself. And Allah knows best.
Really, it is Hijab who embarrassed himself on multiple levels. Can you show exactly where Wood says "al-Lah prays to the prophet" and not "prays for the prophet"? Wood said clearly "If al-Lah prays for the prophet, who does he pray to if he is God?". Hijab gets up all pompous and says "He doesn't pray to, he prays for" like he did something intelligent and impressive. Problem is both Wood and Hijab are incorrect in saying The verse translates to "prays for". The verse says al-Lah prays "on" the prophet not "for". This is far more shameful for a Muslim who made a public display of being wrong and equating it with victory. Even sadder how many Muslims blindly agree and think he accomplished something profound also.
@@Techuser704 It was shameful and more shameful it is being celebrated as something like a profound victory by Muslims who do indeed imbibe large amounts of dawaganda. Are you able to show exactly where David Wood says "al-Lah prays to the prophet" or not?
Brother, your counters were good enough to dismiss the nonsense David Wood spewed out. There was no need to mock his face or his person. You need to control your street-smart mockery and personal attacks. Your logic and strength of religious argument are effective enough without the need to mock and embarrass your opponent.
@@JeanBeliveau-il1mg my understanding that verse, word for word,InnaAllaha(Indeed Allah) wamalaikatahu(and His Angels) yusolluna(send blessings) ala(upon) nabiyi(the prophet)..there is no pray on or pray for
@@lazdfadammahom7488 The idea of Allah and his angels praying for the Prophet Muhammad is described in Sūrah 33:56 of the Qurʾān. The phrase "God prays for the Prophet" is the most obvious and deepest meaning of the verse, but some question whether it is possible for God, who is described as transcendent and limitless, to pray for one of his creatures. A chapter titled “God and His Angels Pray for the Prophet”: A Qurʾānic Paradigm” argues that two elements support a literal interpretation of the verse. Oxford Academic “God and His Angels Pray for the Prophet”: A Qurʾānic Paradigm This chapter examines the problem of the God and the angels' ṣallāt for Muhammad described in Sūrah 33:56 of the Qurān. Specifically, it addresses the question of whether God, whose transcendence Islam describes as inconceivable, and who cannot be limited, really “prays for” the Prophet, one of his own creatures. It argues that two elements support and ratify, rather than undermine, a literal interpretation of Sūrah 33:56-“God prays for the Prophet”- which is the phrase's most obvious and at the same time its deepest meaning. Generative AI is experimental.
@@lazdfadammahom7488 The idea of Allah and his angels praying for the Prophet Muhammad is described in Sūrah 33:56 of the Qurʾān. The phrase "God prays for the Prophet" is the most obvious and deepest meaning of the verse, but some question whether it is possible for God, who is described as transcendent and limitless, to pray for one of his creatures. A chapter titled “God and His Angels Pray for the Prophet”: A Qurʾānic Paradigm” argues that two elements support a literal interpretation of the verse. Oxford Academic “God and His Angels Pray for the Prophet”: A Qurʾānic Paradigm This chapter examines the problem of the God and the angels' ṣallāt for Muhammad described in Sūrah 33:56 of the Qurān. Specifically, it addresses the question of whether God, whose transcendence Islam describes as inconceivable, and who cannot be limited, really “prays for” the Prophet, one of his own creatures. It argues that two elements support and ratify, rather than undermine, a literal interpretation of Sūrah 33:56-“God prays for the Prophet”- which is the phrase's most obvious and at the same time its deepest meaning.
@@lazdfadammahom7488 The idea of Allah and his angels praying for the Prophet Muhammad is described in Sūrah 33:56 of the Qurʾān. The phrase "God prays for the Prophet" is the most obvious and deepest meaning of the verse, but some question whether it is possible for God, who is described as transcendent and limitless, to pray for one of his creatures. A chapter titled “God and His Angels Pray for the Prophet”: A Qurʾānic Paradigm” argues that two elements support a literal interpretation of the verse. “God and His Angels Pray for the Prophet”: A Qurʾānic Paradigm This chapter examines the problem of the God and the angels' ṣallāt for Muhammad described in Sūrah 33:56 of the Qurān. Specifically, it addresses the question of whether God, whose transcendence Islam describes as inconceivable, and who cannot be limited, really “prays for” the Prophet, one of his own creatures. It argues that two elements support and ratify, rather than undermine, a literal interpretation of Sūrah 33:56-“God prays for the Prophet”- which is the phrase's most obvious and at the same time its deepest meaning.
There are four Arabic words, which could lead to submission of the entire world to Islam, if non-Muslims do not fully understand their meaning and implications. Those words are takiyya, tawriya, kitman, and muruna. Each of these words describes a different style of deception used by Muslims when discussing Islam or their activities as Muslims. Muhammad famously said, “War is deceit.” (Bukhari, Vol. 4, Book 52, Number 268) The Quran boasts that Allah is the “master of all scheming” (Surah 13:42) and that he is “profound in his machinations” (Surah 8:30). Western civilizations are not accustomed to dealing with people, who have developed deception into an art form. Knowledge is power, and the best way to combat the Islamist agenda is to say, “We are wise to your shenanigans. Knock it off!” Takiyya Takiyya is defined as dissimulation about ones Muslim identity. It comes from the verse in the Quran that says, “Let believers not make friends with infidels in preference to the faithful - he that does has nothing to hope for from Allah - except in self-defense (illaa an-tattaqu minhum tuqah) (Surah 3:28). This “self-defense” justifies dissimulation. Islamic Sharia Law provides, “When it is possible to achieve an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible, and lying is obligatory if the goal is obligatory.” (Reliance of the Traveler, Para r8.2) Examples include lying to protect Islam or a Muslim. Tawriya Tawriya is defined as concealing, and it could be called “creative lying”. It is OK to break the intent of the oath, as long as you don’t break the letter of the oath. (Reliance of the Traveler, sections o19.1 and o19.5) How does this work? Suppose someone protests that Surah 1 of the Quran demeans Christians and Jews, because it is a supplication Muslims make to Allah seventeen times a day to keep them from the path of “those with whom God is angry” and “those who have lost their way”. A Muslim might respond, “Surah 1 never mentions Jews or Christians.” He is practicing tawriya, because while Surah 1 does not mention Jews and Christians by name, but he knows full-well that the words “those” refer to Jews and Christians. Another example would be when a Muslim responds to your greeting of “Merry Christmas!” He might say, “I wish you the best.” In your mind, you think he has returned a Christmas greeting. In actuality, he has expressed his wish for you to convert to Islam; he wishes the best for you which, in his view, is becoming a Muslim. Kitman Kitman is characterized by someone telling only part of the truth. The most common example of this is when a Muslim says that jihad really refers to an internal, spiritual struggle. He is not telling “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”, as witnesses are sworn to do in U.S. courts. Often, kitman results in a gross distortion of the truth. In the example given, the Quran uses jihad and its derivatives 59 times. Of those, only 16 (27%) could be considered “internal” with no object as the target of the struggle based on the context of the surah. Another common form of kitman is to quote only the few peaceful passages from the Quran, knowing full-well that that passage was later abrogated by a more militant, contradictory verse. Here is an example: “There is no compulsion in religion” (Surah 2:256) Early Medina “Are they seeking a religion other than Allah’s, when every soul in the heavens and earth has submitted to Him, willingly or by compulsion?” (Surah 3:83 Later Medina) Another example: “Permission to take up arms is hereby given to those who are attacked, because they have been wronged.” (Surah 22:39) Late Mecca “When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them and lie in ambush everywhere for them.” (Surah 9:5) Late Medina Muruna Muruna means using “flexibility” to blend in with the enemy or the surroundings. The justification for this kind of deception is a somewhat bizarre interpretation of Surah 2:106, which says, “If we abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten, We will replace it by a better one or similar.” Thus, Muslims may forget some of the commands in the Quran, as long as they are pursuing a better command. Muslims striving to advance Islam, therefore, can deviate from their Islamic laws in order to cause non-Muslims to lower their guard and place their trust in their Muslim counterpart. At times, Muslims practice muruna in the same way a chameleon changes colors to avoid detection. Muslims will sometimes shave off their beards, wear western clothing, or even drink alcohol to blend in with non-Muslims. Nothing is more valuable these days to the Islamists than a blue-eyed Caucasian Muslim willing to engage in terrorism. Another common way of using muruna is for a Muslim to marry a non-Muslim or to behave like a non-Muslim so their true agenda will not be suspected. The 9/11 hijackers visited strip clubs and bars during their off-times while taking classes in the U.S. to fly airplanes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the White House. Many Americans believe Hillary Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin, married Jewish Congressman Anthony Weiner at least in part to burnish her security credentials so she could infiltrate the highest levels of the Administration. The implications of these highly-honed tactics of deception could be enormous for unassuming Western societies. Twenty years ago, psychologist Paul Ekman wrote an insightful book, “Telling Lies”, which demonstrated that people give off recognizable clues when they are practicing deceit. Their consciences cause them, involuntarily, to sweat or raise their voices or make other recognizable gestures. However, Dr. Ekman’s research was exclusively with people from Western cultures. Muslims, on the other hand, show no discernible signs when they are being deceitful because there is no feeling of guilt. In their minds they are doing exactly what Allah wants them to do to advance Islam. Because any Western person who has raised children knows almost intuitively when someone is lying, so they assume they can do that in all cases. Unfortunately, those same Western people can be easily duped by Islamic deceit because there are no tell-tale signs in the deceiver. Hopefully, this article will be a wake-up call to the unsuspecting infidels. Trust but verify - as was an old American strategy in dealing with potentially hostile parties - is the way to go in dealing with Islamists.
Aal-e-Imran 3:59 إِنَّ مَثَلَ عِيسَىٰ عِندَ ٱللَّهِ كَمَثَلِ ءَادَمَۖ خَلَقَهُۥ مِن تُرَابٍ ثُمَّ قَالَ لَهُۥ كُن فَيَكُونُ Indeed, the example of Jesus to Allah is like that of Adam. He created him from dust; then He said to him, "Be," and he was.
@@Dawahclips487 Maybe because you pagan deity has 2 right hands it takes longer. Here is Kashani tafsir of 2:51 of Quran. Yet another TikTok Muslim doesn't know Quran and rejects his scholars. Bravo Abdul. Us so that the natural coverings that had veiled his heart from the nature of light would be lifted during the forty [days] in which his body was being created out of the fetal form and while he was veiled as a result of this formation from [his] primordial nature - as reported in a ḥadīth: 'He fermented the clay from which Adam was made in His hand for forty mornings' - [and] from his heart's aspect,
When Hijab read the Holy Quran in Arabic repeatedly, it unfortunately throws off his momentum and efficiency of his debates among non Muslims and non Arabic speakers. He has excellent points and wins the debate but the unnecessary reading of the Quran in Arabic which non Muslims do not understand it anyway, is a turn off.
never gets old. i love watching this again and again. proving how islamophobia Christian preacher can be. they cant explain their own religion now they want to explain others .. how dumb can they be? well, US are always looking for scapegoat to their ignorance and mistakes, its not new.
David Coal needs to study first. These are basic islamic things that he is getting messed up. Even as kids, we know about these verses more than David Coal.
7:10 You christians have to interpret/explain whatever concept u have regarding Jesus pbuh biologically because: Pastors all across the world screaming " only Begotten son.. only begotten son. " No muslim claiming such about quran or spirit or anything. Please kindly refrain from false equivalence.
Great job but I would deliver debate in more modest way. There is an ounce of kibr there which puts me off. how Islam the most gentle way of life is jeopardised by such interactions. Sorry.
How slyly he distorted the meaning of pray in case of a trinitarian Jesus. He said "it makes perfect sense to us trinitarians for the Son to SPEAK to the Father".
In the beginning was Confusion and confusion was with Confusion and Confusion became Confusion because apparently God created god to pray to God to save god from God but then reject god to kill god because god worships God!! - Christianity Allhumdolilla for ISLAM ❤️🕋❤️
@@JeanBeliveau-il1mg Can God die in any way shape or FORM? 🤔 Christians: No, Yeah, No but yeah but no but manGODS flesh died but the MANflesh is not manGOD it’s spiritMAN😆😂🤣
@@JeanBeliveau-il1mg Timothy 6:16 He *ALONE* is Immortal It is he alone who has immortality and dwells in unapproachable light, *whom no one has ever seen or can see;* to him be honor and eternal dominion. What does He *ALONE* is *IMMORTAL* mean??? 🤦🏽
It’s crazy that Muhammad hijab just resorts to making fun of people and asking them questions when they’re not allowed to answer when he can’t actually disprove a point
He’s not David wood anymore. He’s David coal now 😂😂😂 all this roasting dude I wouldn’t leave my house ever again hahahahha but these David types are so shameless
I unfortunately have to agree with many people. I wish Mr hijab was more humble in his approach. Most of wood's points are ridiculous, but unfortunately hijab spent too much time putting him down rather than giving detailed counterpoints and unfortunately had some slip ups that were avoidable. I have absolutely zero experience in debates and am not trying to disrespect hijab's work. But I think humbly answering everything would have been much more impactful than repeating that he will educate him.
