Don't take this list as a "be-all-end-all" please, it is meant to entertain :) Also if you want to make your own tierlist, here is the template: tiermaker.com/create/wargame-red-dragon-coaltions-tierlist-1423341
Imo Czechoslovakia deserves a higher rating, such as mid B tier, their availability bonus is huge and they have less holes than China (infantry ATGMs, superheavy, FCS howitzer). Their infantry probably is somewhat worse than East Germany (although Lehka Pechota and Specialni are unique and very good and Motostrelci are strong line infantry), but they are better in almost every other category: better tanks, better helicopters with Vydskari in Mi-17s still being very potent, the air tab benefits massively from the availability buffs, better reconnaissance, etc.
They really shine in Tactical games. You can bring 3 OP Bomber migs, 3 Modernas, 3 Ondavas ( i think )... So its really cool when fighting in niche tactics... or overall too. I think they are a strong nation, they only seem to lack decent transports for fire support IMHO
20:19 Say what you will about 10vs10 itself (I can see the appeal of playing it once awhile), but the fact that the 10vs10 playerbase absolutely refuses to play on servers with a normal amount of points really says a lot about those people.
i think you're underrating canada. they have decent infantry, decent aa and artillery, a good medium tank, a usable recon tab and a usable airforce. there are several nations in d-tier with far bigger capability gaps and fewer good cards. speaking of capability gaps, imho poland and japan should be ranked lower. japan lacks a decent 5pt transport, shock infantry, any medium tank, and their air tab has only 2 decent cards. poland has terrible infantry transports (except the promet, but you can't get it with combat infantry), no mortars and generally underwhelming indirect HE capabilities.
All the Soviets need is just to have the BTR-80, BTR-80A, and BTR-90 available for the gornostrelki'90 as transports, also their mortars have a bug I believe, the NONA and NONA-SVK are based on the BTR-D and BTR-80, both these vehicles have 2 armour to the side and front, but the NONA has only 1 for side and front and NONA-SVK has 2 for only the front
I play the dutch a lot, and I find they're one of the better factions. Decent tanks, great recon (with that tank), you can spam out inf out the wazoo. My 2 gripes are expensive planes (but good) and really not a lot of great helicopter options
So much triggered with Raz injustice Chinese motor, Korean general, Red Dragon mech - quite competitive 1v1 decks. Every single of them can take B-high C tier. Korean > Japan (1v1) in absolutely every aspect, except for the presence of SH (not so critical for 1v1).
Gave you a thumbs up and a sub. constructive criticsm: You talk a little fast at times, combined with the accent (no offense it, doesn't sound bad and your English is great!) it just makes some words hard to hear. If you talked just like a tiny bit slower, during those brief moments when you're fast talking I think it would be an improvement. Thanks for the list :)
I would rank Canada much higher. Low C having a kindof superheavy replacement with the Chimera helps a lot. It's probably the worst superheavy but it can be used as one. Great inf/aa/mortar, competent air
With close to best infantry and a decent pallet of tanks I see it quite intresting to put Sweden at the bottom. Solo decks norway and denmark is not as frequent 😄 But intresting to see scandinavian decks as a strong coalition 😎
@@ProvidenceXIV Norrlandsjägare are quite good. Strf 90 is still a quite good transport as well. Only issue is with cheap spam. Still it's a manageable problem and far easier to play Sweden then Norway or Denmark that lacks tanks.
swedish infantry is among the worst. they don't have 10pt line infantry, they use only base mgs and they have only 2 decent transports, the very expensive 9040 and the 1-of tgb 13. their recon tab is also terrible.
@@FloppyHardrive1989 no super heavies, limited availability of the three good cards of tanks you do have. You have a single good fighter in the F-16, but it doubles as a tank killer. Nat China isn’t that good…. Having one thing that is Almost as good as Germany isn’t a good way to convince me the deck is good lol
@@df8340 What... just because ROK has flaws doesn't mean it doesn't deserve a higher rating, The Block 52D can perform double duty as a SEAD Plane but you got a decent back up ASF
