Тёмный

Who are we? Identity politics dissected 

worldwrite
Подписаться 14 тыс.
Просмотров 36 тыс.
50% 1

Identity politics are now pervasive. Universal principles are turned to dust by the phrases ‘As a black woman’, ‘As a gay man’ or ‘As a Muslim’. People increasingly categorise themselves by race, gender, sexuality, religion, and culture. Yet historically, progressive political movements fought for people not to be defined by their race, religion, gender or sexuality. Modernity has been the story of forging one’s identity in defiance of birth or biology, through what you achieved, by engaging with the world beyond yourself. But increasingly, radicals seem to be rediscovering the lure of essentialism. Filmed at the Battle of Ideas quite a panel of luminaries and an outspoken audience do more than make polite conversation. Share the video and your thoughts.
The speakers are Dr Julian Baggini, founding editor, the Philosophers' Magazine; Ivan Hewett, chief music critic, Daily Telegraph, professor, Royal College of Music, author, Music: healing the rift; Sunder Katwala, director, British Future, former general secretary, Fabian Society; Professor Michele Moody-Adams, Joseph Strauss professor of political philosophy and legal theory, Columbia University; Brendan O'Neill, editor, spiked, columnist, Big Issue, contributor, Spectator, author, A Duty to Offend: Selected Essays. The chair is Claire Fox, director, Institute of Ideas, panellist, BBC Radio 4's Moral Maze and author of I Find That Offensive.
Help us caption & translate this video!
amara.org/v/ZnRJ/

Опубликовано:

 

7 ноя 2016

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 133   
@breevestal
@breevestal 7 лет назад
When someone tells me to "check my privilege" it immediately shuts down communication and I don't even bother furthering the conversation.
@Trobynski
@Trobynski 7 лет назад
Not the slightest bit of importance to the working class. I claim that identity doesn't matter. Eating matters. Having a shower. Putting a roof over your head. Etc.
@chriscolabella880
@chriscolabella880 5 лет назад
I've been working as a teacher in the UK for the last 16 years. For me this whole issue is intrinsically linked to a huge collapse in resilience. I see this clearly in children but perhaps it's true across society?
@buzzee9961
@buzzee9961 7 лет назад
Perhaps identity groups will continue to fragment to the point where every group is a group of one member...?
@UberOcelot
@UberOcelot 6 лет назад
This is the best, most balanced discussion on identity politics that I've seen. More discussions need to demonstrate the fine line that need be walked.
@peacerebelgirl
@peacerebelgirl 7 лет назад
'I think the new politics of identity is built on the collapse of real identity and the weakness of people's sense of themselves' precisely!
@rsmith4339
@rsmith4339 5 лет назад
I was gob smacked by the fascinating and erudite panel . They addressed the topic from several angles I had never thought of .
@anon9110
@anon9110 7 лет назад
All I know is that our beliefs dont define us. I may be a woman, Feminist etc. but those are just my experiences of being human. They are not really who I am. Who we all are is just consciousness having an experience and we all just have different points of attention. Why our beliefs are not really who we are is that they can change. They are not concrete like you are. So basically all we really are is awareness. Thats what it all boils down. We are awareness having an experience.
@leichenweich
@leichenweich 6 лет назад
Keep your identity, but keep it out politics. I think politics is more about what you want, than what you are.
@thecword8256
@thecword8256 7 лет назад
What about aggressive identities asking for special treatments and using this as a Trojan Horse to destroy other identities ?
@MrPhinev
@MrPhinev Год назад
Brilliant that this is recorded and available here
@gailreed1508
@gailreed1508 6 лет назад
I'm giving this 10 outta 10....what a stimulating and interesting discussion. Thoroughly enjoyed.
@searose6192
@searose6192 6 лет назад
The 3rd speaker is right about setting aside differences and unifying. And it was brilliantly put to say "wounding is not inherently ennobling", however I think she is wrongly assigning belife in ideals and standing up in those ideals being based on identity, the abolitionists weren't abolitionists because they had a particular identity that predetermined their disposition to slavery, rather their belife in an ideal and a moral code transcended their various identities and they rallied together over a cause. It is just flat out wrong to lay such victories at the feet of "people setting themselves aside based on an identity characteristic" as the speaker said.
@philipchambers4165
@philipchambers4165 4 года назад
Identity doesn't equal values. People of all 'identities' have and develop all values. The way to make society work is to achieve the widest possible acceptance of shared values. Identity is only important in private life, the way you interact with family and friends, or when you are denied participation in society because of your particular identity/identities.
@amadeusdebussy6736
@amadeusdebussy6736 6 лет назад
When an identity like "straight white male" can encompass nerdy Dungeons & Dragons enthusiasts, meth dealing motorcycle gang members and everything in between, it doesn't really seem like a very useful distinction.
@deanwehland2901
@deanwehland2901 7 лет назад
What politicizes identity IS the idea of implied victimization of these identity groups. This idea of being a victim becomes political when feeling entitled to some form of compensation. Thus it becomes necessary to create and identify the victimizers. Straight White Male. Once you identify as a victim you give up your power and ability to assume responsibility to change your life. Gimme Gimme Gimme instead of I do I can I have control. It's very lazy and sad.
@searose6192
@searose6192 6 лет назад
There seems to be an inherent belife in identity politics that there is no such thing as empathy, and humans are only capable of sympathy.
@hvrtguys
@hvrtguys 6 лет назад
We should insist that people only speak for themselves. For example: "as a white male" has no real meaning since white males are all different. A single "white male" does not have the authority to speak on behalf of all white males.
@kannan749
@kannan749 3 года назад
Its all about entitlements vs earnings and self respect. Current generation is very fragile !
@matthiaswalker38
@matthiaswalker38 7 лет назад
Identity requires assumptions based on the defining aspects of said identity. Then when those assumptions are made there are accusations of stereotyping. What does race, gender etc tell me about a person ? Absolutely nothing
Далее
Gender Wars: is masculinity toxic for boys?
1:08:46
Просмотров 161 тыс.
Rory Stewart In Conversation
1:09:49
Просмотров 3,8 тыс.
Is London too rich to be interesting?
1:25:14
Просмотров 189 тыс.
Feminism: in conversation with Camille Paglia
1:21:03
Просмотров 239 тыс.