Thanks for sharing your thoughts. The concept of Guru-disciple , was logical in good old days-Upanishads and subsequently too but since the advent if modern technology all gurus are available on RU-vid! A search will taje us to real master! Just as have started enjoying your way of explaining, you become a guru without meeting you in person! We are lucky to be around and learn all about our religion philosophy and culture! As you say, there are many fraud roaming around as Gurus and gullible persons are trapped by them, so today learning via ‘ Shravan ‘ & ‘ manan ‘ is greatly facilitated by technology, jai shri Krishn 🙏
it's not my place nor capacity to comment or advice you. however I just want wish you all the best as it wud be wonderful to see someone so energetic and optimistic reach great heights for himself and the humanity. hope you will make the best use of this vibrant energy and this rare combination of birth you gave been blessed with. I learnt one thing from you in this video, a simple point that I have been Missing for sometime cuz of oversight, but your video made me aware and gave me clues for where to look further to find my answers. I am extremely great ful for u to have created this opportunity where cud connect with you like a guru and guide in the moment of dilemma. once again wish you all best.
One thing want to share Steven Hawking recognized as the best astrophysicist of the time said in his expanding Universe theory that the we are in the middle of the creation and destruction. But it is Sree MatBhagabatm said it thousands years ago. Hawking was a atheist though. Source A brief history of time and Sree MatBhagabatm.
Thank you Amarnath Prabhu for your time and efforts. I have question when we take example of guru nanak where he says as Guru is needed. Is it 100% always for everyone? If yes, what about bhakata tukaram, meera bhai and recently Ramana Maharshi. Please provide your valuable input for these type of confusing questions to have clarity.
Most of those who say they are gurus are NOT real. Given the Vedas say a guru is one who knows the Vedas, but most of those out there haven't read them nor know them. If they did they would debunk themselves.
One cannot but note the irony that "in order to get a guru, one must pray to Krsna" ... when it is said that one cannot directly approach (beseech... what have you) the Supreme Lord. So the exception ... is that one MUST approach the Supreme Lord to get a guru? But perhaps it is a question of our approach to the Supreme Lord itself is necessarily instigated by Sri Guru... without our knowing. For example the sincere devotee says to us "Just chant this mantra" (Hare Krsna etc.) and innocently we chant. That devotee is the guru ... "bahu guru" perhaps ... or we hear the chanting on radio and we just sing along. Also the chanting, the maha mantra... that is guru and by that guru we "pray to Krsna for a guru". So what is the highest principle? Even in order to approach US, Sri Krsna becomes guru. Even Sri Krsna appears in this world and takes a guru. Even Sri Krsna cannot even approach Himself except by agency of Guru (Sri Radha).
When i first saw sadhguru on youtube i asked myself "who is this false guru" but steadily his words have eliminated my questions, and the darkness on my own ignorance is being dispelled. So he must be a bonafide guru
*మనిషులు ఇతరులేవరో దేవుడి పేరు మీద బోధించే జ్ఞానంలో, వారు పెట్టే భయాలలో తన మనసును ఇరికించక పోతే కచ్చితంగా సృష్టిలో ఉత్కృష్ట జీవులై పవిత్ర గ్రంధాలలో చెప్పబడిన సృష్టి ఆదిలో మాదిరి, దేవునితో మనిషి కల్గిన నిజ అనుబంద సంబందమైన సత్య జ్ఞానం, సత్ ప్రవర్తన, సత్ సంబందం తో సహజ సిద్దంగా విరాజిల్లుతూ దేవునికి ప్రతి రూపంగా ఈ సృష్టి అనే స్వర్గంలో సత్ చిత్ ఆనందము లో ఓలలాడుతూ ఉంటాడు. మనసును దృక్పదాల, విశ్వాసాల, నమ్మకాల చెరనుండి విదిపించడమే సాధన యొక్క లక్ష్యం. నేనే సత్యం అహంబ్రహ్మాస్మి శివోహం.*
Who know the process and mechanism how to see the god in heart-- at the same time everywhere he is real Guru? he is real Guru who knows brahmo Paramatta and bhagwan R1
There is no such thing as LIVING. Prabhupada never spoke about LIVING. Guru is always LIVING. Please correct your assumptions please pr. "He reasons ill who says that Vaisnavas die, When thou art living still in sound! The Vaisnavas die to live, and living try To spread the holy name around." - Bhaktivinoda Thakura Vani is more important than Vapu. Physical association is not as important as via instructions from Guru.
