Nenu karnudu fan. Arjunudu medaa pedda liking yem ledu but After some research. I know that Karna is very bad fellow then duryodhana. Karnudu shakthi asthram kosam kavachaa kundalalu exchange chesaadu (arjundu ni champadaniki chalaa avsaram) Karnudu draupadi ni anaa rani matalu annadu migitavallu lagaa silent ga vundi vundavachhu ( like bheesma and dhrona) Karnudu oka egoist, arjundu medaa vunna jealous thoney Duryodhanudu ni yuddam kosaam rechha gottaddu Karnudu chalaa maandi chetlo vodipoyadu: Satyaki (yadavudu), Abhimanyudu, Arjunudu (tho aayte okka sari kudaa gelavaa lekapoyaadu) Chitrangudu (gandharva raju) ah fight lo aytey durryodhanudni vontaari ga vadiley paripoyadu Karnudu intaka mundu janma lo oka rakshasudu (nara narayna la tho fight chesi vodipoyi suryudu daggarki paripoyadu next janma lo karnudu ga puttaaduu) Karnudu ki antha hype yendukantey karnudu life lo jariginaa story chalaa interesting ga vuntundii so cinema vallaku ah character tho cinemalu cheyyadam modalaa pettaru valla saulabyam kosam hero ni chesaaru anthey thappinchey karnudu ki arjunudi ni voidinchy antha scene ledu Bheesmudu ki, dronudu ah visayam telusu kabattey karnudu ki antha importance ivvaledu. Learn good things from wise people like yudishthir (dhrama raj) not from karna( a villain)
@@kadirammagaarichinnakadara6244 Research అవసరంలేదు మిత్రమా వ్యాస మహాభారతం చదివితే చాలు.. వాళ్ళు ఎందుకు సినిమాలు ఆలా తీశారో వాళ్లనే అడుగు. అంతే కానీ వంద మంది వంద సినిమాలు కర్ణుడిని గొప్పగా చూపించినంతమాత్రాన కర్ణుడు గొప్పవాడు అవలేడు. అబద్ధం నిజము అవలేదు.
@@kadirammagaarichinnakadara6244 Vyasa’s Mahabharata is an epic that showcases the victory of Dharma (righteousness) over Adharma (unrighteousness), with Arjuna as its hero. The main hero is Arjuna, and the epic iteself starts with a tribute to Krishna and Arjuna. However, in today's world, most people don't read Vyasa’s Mahabharata because it's long and complex. Instead, they get their knowledge from TV shows and novels, which need to be entertaining and profitable. Here's where the problem lies: Arjuna, the epic's hero, lacks the drama that TV audiences crave. Arjuna's life is almost too perfect-he’s a royal prince, handsome, gifted, hardworking, respectful, obedient, a top-notch and powerful warrior of Dwapar yuga and completely devoted to Krishna. In addition to this the Dhanurveda, written by Veda Vyasa, focuses on the science of archery. It states that a bowman should recite Arjuna’s ten names, following the names of Bhagwan Shiva and Shri Rama, before going to war. This indicates that Arjuna is regarded as the greatest archer after Lord Shiva and Shree Rama. While inspiring, his character isn’t very relatable to the mass audience today. On the other hand, complex, gray characters with rags-to-riches stories are what really capture audiences' attention. This is where Karna, fits in perfectly. Karna’s story is full of dramatic twists: abandoned at birth, raised by a charioteer, becoming on of the great warriors, unknowingly befriending the main villain, sacrificing his natural armor and earrings, and ultimately standing by his friend, even though he knew it was against Dharma, and sacrificing his life for his cause. Karna’s life is full of emotional turmoil, making for great TV drama. However, Karna in Vyasa’s version has flaws like status insecurity, jealousy, arrogance, and boastfulness. To make Karna more likable, these traits are often toned down and transferred to Arjuna instead. Arjuna’s accomplishments are also downplayed to level the playing field. To further soften Karna’s character, problematic events like Draupadi’s disrobing are often reinterpreted. Instead of being an instigator, Karna is shown as reluctantly participating or being helpless. His generosity is also exaggerated, like turning his deal with Indra into an act of pure charity. Even his promise to Kunti about not killing four of her sons, which Kunti never asked for, is added to make him seem even more noble. Karna’s killing of Abhimanyu is sometimes depicted as a mercy killing to relieve Abhimanyu’s suffering. These tweaks turn Karna into a tragic hero who, despite siding with evil, is relatable and sympathetic. This makes him more popular than Arjuna, who appears privileged and less relatable by comparison. In essence, TV adaptations often modify characters to make the story more engaging and relatable, leading to Karna’s increased popularity over Arjuna.
