Who RUINED Sultan Abdul-Hamid II's Caliphate? 

Amin Thumma Amin

اللهم آمين

Ameen.

@@cartesian_doubt6230 Shut up infidel! That’s where you’ll end up you dirty devil!

Ameen

@@cartesian_doubt6230 We know you will be.

Salafism was brought to Saudi Arabia by freemasons and merged with the divisive, deviant wahhabism to create a watered down, subservient to the government version of Islam. It was put into a high position by Rockefeller Oil

The New name of Wahabis are now Salafists saying to peaple first pray and then talk about Gaza or dont protest to the government leaders dont boycot it will not help . Even McDonald's,KFC big Pro Israel supporting places are open in Mecca & Medina there is not boycoting if you saying anything they take u in the prison. They working togehter with Crusaders to fight against Islam .

Well said ,to the point

👏👏👏👏👏🙏🙏

The late Ottomans were known for their sufism and shirk practices. Mohammed ibn Abd al-Wahhab introduced renewed Tawheed to the Muslim world.

people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over... Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk, the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan... So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!

​@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Where was the 'correct aqeeda' before Abdul Wahab?

Indeed.

​@@abdullahassaffahAudhubillah, do not compare Muhammad ibn Abd Al-Wahhab to Hajjaj.

So true but sadly we are living in times when even 'Muslims' are criticising sharia law and rather then learning lessons from last 100 years we continue to be reactionaries and every time 'they' succeed to cause further disunity in ummah 😢

there is not emperor muslims nor ottoman or nor any other nor a country is muslim nor a president i think islam deny nationalism and emperors.

*@user-ov3xe9jy2t.* Caliph and Sultan, no such thing as _empereur_ or _king_ in Islam. Muslim have only One King, *ALLAH, Al Malik.*

@@brahim119 you don't know about Islam there is the Caliphate in Islam not president As you can see in the form of Rashiduddin Caliphate You should take some knowledge about Islam then start talking

@@SultanSkindarZulqarnain I think you replied to the wrong person. READ my previous comment again.

@@brahim119 أَلَمۡ تَرَ إِلَى ٱلۡمَلَإِ مِنۢ بَنِیۤ إِسۡرَ ٰ⁠ۤءِیلَ مِنۢ بَعۡدِ مُوسَىٰۤ إِذۡ قَالُوا۟ لِنَبِیࣲّ لَّهُمُ ٱبۡعَثۡ لَنَا مَلِكࣰا نُّقَـٰتِلۡ فِی سَبِیلِ ٱللَّهِۖ قَالَ هَلۡ عَسَیۡتُمۡ إِن كُتِبَ عَلَیۡكُمُ ٱلۡقِتَالُ أَلَّا تُقَـٰتِلُوا۟ۖ قَالُوا۟ وَمَا لَنَاۤ أَلَّا نُقَـٰتِلَ فِی سَبِیلِ ٱللَّهِ وَقَدۡ أُخۡرِجۡنَا مِن دِیَـٰرِنَا وَأَبۡنَاۤىِٕنَاۖ فَلَمَّا كُتِبَ عَلَیۡهِمُ ٱلۡقِتَالُ تَوَلَّوۡا۟ إِلَّا قَلِیلࣰا مِّنۡهُمۡۚ وَٱللَّهُ عَلِیمُۢ بِٱلظَّـٰلِمِینَ﴿ ٢٤٦ ﴾ • Dr. Mustafa Khattab: Have you not seen those chiefs of the Children of Israel after Moses? They said to one of their prophets, “Appoint for us a king, ˹and˺ we will fight in the cause of Allah.” He said, “Are you not going to cower if ordered to fight?” They replied, “How could we refuse to fight in the cause of Allah, while we were driven out of our homes and ˹separated from˺ our children?” But when they were ordered to fight, they fled, except for a few of them. And Allah has ˹perfect˺ knowledge of the wrongdoers. Al-Baqarah, Ayah 246 “Successorship (al-khilâfah) after me shall last for thirty years. After that, there will be kingship.” (Ahmad) Many other narrations also, monarchy is accepted

The Ottomans also legalized homosexuality in the Tanzimat period.

We don’t need any caliph to be a good Muslim. Your great Caliph was responsible for massacring 1.5 million Armenian Christians.

Why don’t you mention the internal decadence and racism as well as shirk done by the turks as well? You think everyone is to blame except the Turks themselves? Fact is, errors were made by all sides.

What they don't teach you in your curricula, the House of Osman legalized homosexuality in the Tanzimat period.

@@ertugrulbae46 kisa ve oz, Bravo!

The House of Osman legalized homosexuality way back, during the Tanzimat period. This was before the Young Turks.

@@عبدالرحمنعبدالله-ز4م History is not a field of conflict of ideas, and ideologies etc. It is not an area to exonerate the Ottomans either. What is meant here is that the Ottoman period relatively coincides with the most prosperous period in history

@@PhilExp No, the most prosperous would be the Omayyad and Abbasid periods, especially the latter wherein was the golden age lasting for half a millennium until the Mongolians ended it. The Ottoman period is one of decline, a dark age. Fighting to defend the French was the last straw and the beginning of the end. But Istanbul was beautiful, albeit at the expense of everyone in their domain, even Makkah and Madinah were left to ruin, as if they were museums, because they believed that their protection was sufficient service, even the Mamelukes made more effort to serve the sanctuaries than the Ottomans, and that's saying something, since they didn't do much either. No surprise since there is no reliable record of any of the Ottoman Sultans making the pilgrimage.

@@عبدالرحمنعبدالله-ز4م Your comment gives the impression that it was quoted from the official history book used in the history classes in an Arab country. We can talk about what the Ottomans did wrong as well as what they did well. It cannot be said that they were completely perfect or bad. Likewise with the Abbasids and Umayyads. They were all part of the Islamic civilization. The sincere period of the Ottomans lasted only 300 years. Then the decay began. Despite everything, it must be admitted that the Turks served Islam a lot. Imam Ali may Allah be pleased with him, had a warrior unit consisting of Turks. Ammar's father Yaser and his mother Sumayya, and Salman the Persian as well may Allah be pleased with Them were Turks. During the time of Our Great Leader Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings upon Him, activities were carried out in Khorasan to convert the Turks to Islam. Turkish warriors of Khorasan came to help Imam Hussein may Allah be pleased with Him in Karbala. Imam Hussein may Allah be pleased with Him sent them back to face his fate. Abbas' son Kussam may Allah be pleased with Them is buried in Samarkand. The Turks are the sword of Allah. This must be accepted as such. Racism is a disease prohibited in Islam. It is the custom of ignorance. Except for the period of the Four Caliphs (may Allah be pleased with Them) in the Golden Age, all rulers are kings and cannot be expected to be perfect. A king cannot be a Caliph. Of course, the period of Omar bin Abd al Aziz, may Allah be pleased with him can be taken as an exception. I think it is necessary to look at the issue from this perspective and realize that there is no use in cursing history. Does Turkey have the ability to represent Islam today? No way. Unfortunately, most of its people have no knowledge of religion. They have become ignorant. However, Allah willing, pure-souled and good-hearted people will return to their roots. May Allah grant guidance to the entire Islamic world. Amen. In my humble opinion, currently Gazan people are most pious Muslims on earth. They are deliberately abandoned by the whole muslim (?) world and have nobody but Allah. Thanx for your patience. Sincerely

almost everyone in turkey loves fatih sultan mehmet secularists love him too

Much appreciated!

​@@Historyunvery informative vedio ,if possible can you do a vedio on the conflicting claims regarding Sultan Abdulhamids role in Palestine, one view is that Sultan abdul hamid prevented the Jews from settling in Palestine while the opposing view says that it was all just talk and in reality he paid for 2 of the trips that hertzl undertook . I want you to present a vedio stating the evidences each side presents and present what your views are regarding this .

It is well know.. if you look it up about Wilhem II

ottoman lost the domination just becuase of missing the industrial age and it is the biggest hand others are just the last blows

Araps still....the actual turkish leader not

Please explain further.

@@abrahamgustavoguitiperez-m2937 Ataturk was a member of the Freemasons order. He was very pro Europe. That wouldn’t have been a problem if he did not push the Turkish nationalistic narrative, built the narrative that the Caliph isn’t a truly Muslim caliph because he’s not supporting the Muslims of India using Islamic values as a tool, got Abdul Hameed II disposed off with a group of like minded people, offended the Shareef of Makkah which initiated the whole Middle Eastern revolt against the ottomans, and once the caliphate was over, he introduced a brand of secularism which was very very anti-Muslim 1. He banned azan in Arabic 2. His policy makers shifted the font from Arabic style alphabets to Latin alphabets 3. Introduced the hat law 4. Banned Islamic clothing for men 5. Witch-hunted the sufi orders, criminalising zikr 6. Turned Hagia Sophia into a museum These are clearly steps to divorce the Turkish nation from their Islamic past. Other than that, he basically Europeanised Turkey. Giving third names to families, which isn’t a Muslim tradition but a european practice. The very thing for which he criticised the caliph, he did that by developing relations with UK. And he himself was quite a debauch person. He contracted an STD because of which he had to have his physician up close till his death, his drinking habits caused him his liver and he couldn’t hold on to a wife. He even refused to accept the dead body of the last caliph in Turkey. And ordered his own burial, not in a grave like Muslims, but in a sarcophagus like Pharaohs. People think of him as a hero who fathered the nation, well he just made it illegal to criticise him. All books, all literature, all the things that came out of his time were heavily censored. This sounds very much like dictatorship to me. And till date, it is illegal to criticise him in Turkey. This was quite impressive for Hitler who followed in his footsteps. Kurdish people are still suffering because of his regime. Infact, his brand of secularism is what France insists upon now I have no stakes in Turkish history, but I refuse to see Ataturk as the hero he’s painted as.

Ataturk he wanted to get of all 🕌 , Quran, even Anatolian language & dress code . He wanted to get rid of ☪️ in Türkiye he made into a secular country . He did die painfully, Allah’s will

what do u mean superficial intention????

Rubbish comment

@@bm_wuratli6883they used Islam to rule in power. That’s all.

Sheikh Lokman Effendi is the one who speaks on Ottoman history

The other one is Muhammad Musa AlShareef

Dr Yakoob Ahmed

Yeah I think Circassian genocide was mentioned in the video.

ottoam is not only turk ...your story is fro children

😂😂😂 what do you talking about little kid ?! Let's say what you say is true, the turks with sticks would fight better than ppl like you with the most modern weapons, check the history.

The ottomans are destroyed because our muslims became greedy and ungrateful...now we see the situation of all

@@unitor699industries The Imperial Ottoman Army is already modern by the time of Abdulhamid II He just had no interest in conquering or colonising, he is more into education just as mentioned in the video

Arabs didn’t recognize Ottoman Empire as a true khilafah

@@Iamfsaly oh ya think 🙄🙄

​@@tauhidershadKUFNAFLORANYes because the Hanbali madhab doesnt allow a non-Qurayshi to be Caliph

It seems you have got no brains brother We are suffering,no matter what our Population is Do you think Palestinians, kashmiris , Syrians, Africans would have still been suffering if our Caliph was present In simple Caliph is a subordinate given from Allah You need to rethink, otherwise you are promoting western ideology Wake up oh brothers we are suffering all around , Don't get trapped into this satanist idea

Muslims are now only in name... numbers are not important in islam

Islam hasn't declined but no global empire anymore

@@sobiyakhan-xr4dz Lol , most of the muslim world was colonised when the ottoman empire was around , you have no idea what you are talking about , in fact we are better now than before.

@@mohammed9w553 *George Curzon, the British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs:* "We must put an end to anything which brings about any Islamic unity between the sons of the Muslims. As we have already succeeded in finishing off the Ottoman Caliphate, so we must ensure that there will never arise again unity for the Muslims, whether it be intellectual, political, economic or cultural unity."

gayturk

your lord never save isreal...hahahah

Who ?

@@IM-3000he’s talking about himself.. 😂

Exactly ,,he knew about the intrigues against ummah to late but still.tried to build a new wave and builded schools around the empire to teach them right so the future youth would act righteous but he was to late sadly

A historian is not a theologian so stay in thy lane.

What Oghuz Turks in Anatolia? There are barely none. What have you smoken mate? Have you ever been in Turkey and seen Anatolia?. By the way Abdul Hamid was never called "Khagan of the Oghuz Turks of Anatolia". You dreaming pal

@@rojvankoc7252 I don't think you've seen Anatolia yourself, so don't disrespect this man for no good reason. Just mention to him that the House of Osman legalized homosexuality in the Tanzimat period.

@@عبدالرحمنعبدالله-ز4م My family clan have lived in Ankara, Haymana for 300 years. If history is correct my ancestors fought beside the Ottomans against the Safavids which ended with the Ottoman Sultan granted us (Kurdish tribe) land in the capital of Turkey. What you talking about braah. Real Turkic people are not a majority in Anatolia. Everybody got more or less mixed with time. That what im trying to tell you

You can't forget those young Turkish rebels and the fake turk kemal.

@@Nixo77 Who made the Ottoman Empire weak for that phase to happen the cowardly Arabs.

​@@Nixo77nah, the seeds of trouble came from as far as during Suleiman I reign. He Made too many bad decision regarding his sons. His immadiate succesor was to be the first Ottoman sultan that never go to lead the Ottoman army into war. The Ottoman went backwards in the 18th Century after series of incompetent and uncommited sultans

@@imawormbeforeiamman6052 Not just that, the people began committing shirk.

Please don't forget the Arabs were the root cause of the decline of the Ummah, so don't sift the blame.

Yes

I second this request, Ustadh AZ. JazakaLlahu khayr for the presentation. But kindly include references one could visit later.

Arab please shut up and keep licking Anglo Saxon a..