Who said Elena Rybakina is quiet? 

Stupid Video just too make Views and money by Spoiling A Famous tennis player reputation.... Such videos need too be banned and deleted

Or she found a reason to say its because shr called it out but she also saw her ball going out… Wè have to trust her…

Los kazajos son inteligentes, se lo compraron a los estúpidos rusos cuando aún no era popular, Kazajstán lo vendió y ahora recibe millones de dólares de Kazajstán y torneos, avanza Rybakin y Kazajstán.

She's a whole lady.

That’s why she’s a favourite of so many

I really admire that - after getting herself in a muddle she was quite happy to correct herself and reach the accurate decision, and she communicated it respectfully to the players.

They need to do that more often. There is no shame in it.

The most idiot umpire in every single sport is tennis umpire. Because they don't know what is the finish poin after 40. They never mention that point'. In pingpong 11;, badminton 21. But in Tennis? Even umpire don't know.😂😂.

And then you have the umpire in that Wimbledon match who said Sabalenka hit the ball back on a completely clean ace.

she shouldnt have made so many mistakes, but yeah good shes open to changing her mind... twice...

Yes, if Selena Williams was there instead, we cannot imagine what she would do

​@@qidongxu7339wait, who??

Sabalenka should've just given the point back. Poor sportsmanship.

That ref was a mix between incompetence and arrogance

@@GoetheDev she cheated for Sabalenka.

@@GoetheDev exactly, horrible to see someone has 1 million% right being so treated,unlistened,that just making me upset.. she should be fun at party this sorceless referee

If she didnt hit the ball it was ace, it is 100% impossible the line umpire influenced her possible return.

She's also kind of stuck with the system. It's easy for us, after the challenge, to look at the reply and say "that was an ace", but she can't do that and that's not her fault. So she really does have to go with what she remembers.

@@user-rf9mx4qf7z Except she "remembered" Sabalenka touching the ball when it wasn't even close. Sabalenka didn't even take a swing! How could your memory be that bad? And if so, you have no business sitting in the chair - or as Elena said, you need to be fined or reprimanded for underperforming in your job.

@@berimboplata Oh, no doubt it's a mistake, and a bad one. I'm not defending that. The point though is that, if that's what she remembers, she's stuck with it. She can't "admit to her mistake" and change the call just because Elena said so. The simple solution would be if she could just watch the replay and check herself, and in that case no doubt she'd have changed it, but she's not allowed to do that. Incidentally, with the number of points umpires watch from the chair, mistakes are bound to happen sometimes. It's easy to forget that when you're just watching on TV without any pressure to make the right call *every single time*. The question should be, how often does she make mistakes like this? If it's every other match, that's a problem. If it's once in her career, it probably isn't.

I would go further, it’s a lie, since it didn’t happen and the umpire said that it did happene. There should be consequences for lying, as you could argue bias against one player and an unfair competition.

@@evko28 No, that won't fly. It's a lie if she *knew* she didn't hit it. If she does remember what she said (probably mixing up different points), it's a mistake, not an intentional lie.

😢 for Rybakina who deserves better. Hope she wins in Indian Wells.

Breaking a racquet isn't making a mistake, it's a deliberate act, a display of petulance. All umpires make mistakes, it's not an easy job, and if you're going to fine them you'd be hard pressed to find enough umpires to run the sport.

Dont compare breaking a racket or other misbehaviour with making a mistake. Umpires are human too, humans make mistakes. It can be very annoying, but dont be so hysterical by asking for fines for umpires, thats just ridiculous

There are consequences for umpire errors in that it affects their individual rating. The higher an umpire’s rating, the greater priority given to him/her for the bigger, more prestigious matches. Tournaments such as Wimbledon also have the authority to ban certain umpires if the committee decides that the umpire is not sufficiently reliable, or has committed an egregious error in a past tournament.

Do you get fined when you do a bad joke at work? That's how dictatorships work.

Yeah Mrs Seefried is COOL

That sounds dumb and not fun to use it.

@@tikycz8261 will avoid confusing and frustrating situations like the ones in this video.

At least use video replays on their funny tablets.

@@tikycz8261 nah, eliminate all human errors. Athletes should not be punished for human errors. Right should always be right.

Hawkeye can make mistakes. The best system is where they have slow-motion cameras covering every out line. I've seen it used at some tournaments. Shows very clearly what happened. Hawkeye can make mistakes if it's not aligned perfectly.

Dissapointing sabalenka😢

Keeping it calm, amid the anger.

Hawkeye can make mistakes. The best system is where they have slow-motion cameras covering every out line. I've seen it used at some tournaments. Shows very clearly what happened. Hawkeye can make mistakes if it's not aligned perfectly.

U clearly never seen Roger's matches against Del Potro, Thiem, Nalbandian. He is not like everyone thinks

@@FrankHor101 and you know everything 🤣🤣🤣 roger was any day better than drama queens djoker and nadull

@@desiremixx7622 I am talking about talent and skills, I am saying behavior on and outside the court

Hawkeye can make mistakes. The best system is where they have slow-motion cameras covering every out line. I've seen it used at some tournaments. Shows very clearly what happened. Hawkeye can make mistakes if it's not aligned perfectly.

@@ce7857 Machines are perfect, but the humans that set them up are not

@@ce7857 Hawkeye shows a different shape than a tennis ball really has, so yeah, obviously cannot be accurate.

It would be impossible for Sabalenka to be affected by the call anyway. It was an ace with no chance for Sabalenka to get to it. They would have to call the ball out in mid air in order to correctly negate the point.

The serve was too fast & she didn't see anything & still said that ? LMFAO . . .

can you explain the whole situation, cos I'm not sure whats happening? Mind you, Im fairly new o tennis

Sure, it's a bit complicated but I Will try lol When the line judge screams "Out" and than its overturned (by the ref or the challenge), there is two options in this scenario: 1st: Replay the point because the line judge stopped the point 2nd: If the ref considers the last ball was a winner and the line judge call didn't impact Rybakina's return (which was out), she can must give the point to the Wang In here, the ref was a bit confused because sequence was: the line judge called out - the ref overturned calling it in - Rybakinas challenged Ref mistakenly thought for a moment Rybakina stopped the play to challenge, so she was responsible for the stoppage (than, the point should be given to Wang). When she was reminded of all the fuss (and it was the line judge who stopped the point, not Rybakina) she admitted she was mistaken and ordered replay the point. Sometimes the refs won't admit they don't remember the play so they just go like "it's my decision, so let's just move on"

@Christian Silva great summary. Need more umpire like the 1st one, accountable for own mistake and make corrections. Unlike the last one who was kind of blind and so dam blur, couldn't see the serve as the ace it was too fast and didn't care what was right . .

Absolutely she knew it was an ace & put her hands up to challenge it. Any tennis player would not just forget the most recent point. She even said oh I don’t know I might have hit the ball. Wow. Just wow.

yeah, that just blows my mind. Rybakina should've sit down at the bench as say shes not playing until this is reviewed

@@adamczubaszek9379 I agree. I felt bad for Rybakina with the Sabalenka match in Wimbledon in this video. She was fighting for fairness, but the umpire won't budge and would probably just give Rybakina a misconduct violation had Rybakina lost control of her emotions.

You are very correct.I am disappointed Sabalenka didn’t show sportsmanship here. Anyway the Ice Queen has come to stay,regardless of any unfair treatment, her racquet will continue to speak for her. Go Elena,go.

Sabalenka didn´t even try to get to the ball. It was an ace. Bad sportmanship by Sabalenka.

Hoping it was out doesn’t mean anything. The only way she could have correctly negated that ace is if the line judge called it out before she could try to hit it and that is impossible.

Hawkeye can make mistakes. The best system is where they have slow-motion cameras covering every out line. I've seen it used at some tournaments. Shows very clearly what happened. Hawkeye can make mistakes if it's not aligned perfectly.

More Russian Propaganda!!!

Not sure what you meant by that I’m not Russian. I am from the UK, and Elena plays for Kazakhstan.

@@lucypedzinski1403 Seriously?

just don't tell the Kazakhs about it

Umpire should be given an award for admitting. It never happens, but its good word to say 'I was confused . . " Will resolve a lot of things.

Yeah, but will they get a fine? Players are treated so bad in comparison to these umpires or press conference attendees.

@@_o..o_1871 The ones who make mistakes without correcting them should be. If an umpire gets something wrong, admits the mistake and corrects themselves, I don't see why they should be fined. People get things wrong, but on the rare occasion that an umpire admits a mistake, there's usually no harm done.

This seems to be a very common misconception. In tennis you cannot have 2 chances of winning the point. You cannot say "I will challenge this ball. If it's out I win the point. If it's in we replay the point. It's a win-win situation for me." You cannot have it both ways. Either you take the chance and challenge, or you replay the point.

@@fredthechamp3475 if the ball was out, the point is won by Elena because her opponent hits it out. If the ball was in, the point is replayed because the rally would have continued with Elena already there hitting the ball. The line judge calls the ball out, umpire corrects and calls it in. Elena then challenges that correction of it being called in. It would have been different if she had been the one to stop the point and challenged the ball being in/out. If she stops the point and challenges and the ball was in, she loses the point because she stopped the point. If ball was out, she wins the point. So you see, it’s different situation based on what interrupted the point.

The umpire was not wrong, just badly worded. You know exactly what she meant.

@@fredthechamp3475 Rybakina would not have missed the shot if they didn’t call it out. Likewise you don’t win the point just because it hit the line and the point was stopped. You have to hit a winner before the call to get the point(like Rybakina’s ace against Sabalenka that they stole from her) If the judge stops the point because they thought it was out and you miss the shot or don’t keep playing when it was actually in then it is their fault for being wrong and the point is restarted. If the other player hits it out and the judge says it was in but you challenge the call and it ends up being out then the other player wasn’t affected by the call and they lose the point.

@@jann84 The umpire was completely wrong in both cases

Quiet “russian” people are dangerous. Lol 😂

She lost that match and that was huge because this was the 4th round and Sabalenka lost in the semifinal. If Rybakina had won this match she probably would have won Wimbledon in 2021 AND 2022 and her career would be much different now, especially with Wimbledon counting for points.

Nobody that I know of has 'accused' Saba of being a good sport, and after watching quite a few of her matches, I'm not about to, either.

Probably nothing happened, I wouldn’t be surprised. All the technology they have now and they can’t look at a replay of the point, it would of took one look to show her mistake.

right after that happen, im pretty she was making up with her husband, laughing at "i'm not so sure..." she belong to the street

I understand what you are saying. The only reason I didn’t credit it in the description is because it does say it’s in the top corner Tennis Advocate. Plus I assure you, I make no profit out of these videos. I only do it for fun and for the Elena fans.

​@@elenarybakina_fan_page5916 ah fair enough :)

Yes I agree she would have been in Top 5

Unfortunately no, I don’t think they get recorded for the public to see. Sorry

@@elenarybakina_fan_page5916 They do get recorded. You can even search for the previous years' champions dinner videos but unfortunately I couldn't find any thing from this year's.

I understand what you mean, but it’s not up to the tours it depends whether the individual tournament can afford the technology. But they will always need Umpires.