Who was Ham - Generation 11 

It's one way to read it from "Cush begat Nimrod"... But one wonders whether that doesn't mean Cush begat rebellion (Nimrod means something in that regard)... Mighty hunter would then be mighty hunt.

​@@metapolitikgedanken612no idiot. Nimrod is a real person smh... You dillweeds read too deeply into it.

​@@metapolitikgedanken612 Some scholars believe Cush became Nimrod, you will notice they are married to the same woman and names mean the same thing.

Some scholars belive Cush became Nimrod. Both are married to the same woman an both names symbolize bad- Cushs name= (black or dark) Nimrods name= mighty hunter. He was black and became a mighty hunter. He elevated himself to a god.

@@camille11ize I recall this. That Nimrod isn't a separate person, but actually just means Rebellion.

Noah did NOT BLESS HAM! Biblically to uncover a man's nakedness is a sexual sin. It is saying ham raped (or had sex with) his mother. And this produced Canaan. That's why Ham was NOT BLESSED and Canaan was cursed.😢

yes Cannan was cursed. but Ham was still disowned for his offence. That doesn't mean the rest of his son's didn't have a bad attitude to the heritage of the family..... hence (Nimrod)=rebellion against God.

​@@lewisyaxley where in Scripture does it say Ham was disowned?

@@apexone5502 it doesn't say it but all the evidence shows that that's what happened... he was the first one to leave after the aucklanded in the air at mountains after the offense against Noah. he settled in Egypt about the same time his grandson was building the tower of Babel... Noah left him out of his death blessing... many scholars have come to the conclusion that him was disowned by Noah his mother and his brothers for the offense of raping his mother who bore him Canaan who was cursed by Noah for that very reason...

@@lewisyaxley that's reading too deeply into what had happened. Unless Scripture says outright what Ham had did beyond "Uncovered Noah's nakedness," then all of those suppositions are nothing but conjecture.

Seeing a man's nakedness generally means raping his woman. That's why Kanan was cursed because he was the progeny that came from it and why he is not included in Noah's genealogy

African a land flowing with milk and honey as you go down to the south, think about that🤔

​@@everlyneojuro5459genetically Lake Victoria is Eden

he slept with his mum, Noah's wife .Is a interpretation of uncovering his father's nakedness ...as far as I've looked into it ..

It is a true theory of what happened to Noah by Ham. the Bible doesn't make it crystal clear from the way I read it but it is a legitimate theory as to what the Bible is saying occurred. I don't know if it will help but look up the word "nakedness" using the KJV and see if that helps.

May also be referring to Ham having sex with his mother (see word nakedness through scripture).

Hello. Thanks for the biblical insight. True. In Levitical language, uncovering your father's nakedness usually refers to sleeping with his wife or concubine. But I don't think the writing of this story supports this interpretation. For instance, if Ham did sleep with his father's wife, how did Shem and Japheth cover Noah's nakedness with a cloth? Doesn't make sense does it? After reading this story in its context, I've come to the conclusion that it's refering to literal nakedness and not Levitical nakedness.

@@markakelo5856 Ham would have been crazy to rape his father then call his brother and laughingly point it out to them. I dont think that's what happen. The theory of Ham stealing Noah's robe that was given to him by Adam seems more plausible. Ham gave cush the garment and cush passed it down to Nimrod.

Actually caanan settled there long before shem. It was Abraham a descendant of shem who claimed that God gave him and his descendants the land that the caananites were occupying.

@@jamesrivers5303 Site your source otherwise you're blowing hot air

​@@alexscott730 The Canaanites were in the land that eventually became Israel. It's literally in the Bible.

@@apexone5502@apexone5502 The land belonged to the Canaanites, and they worshiped YAHWEH first! Abraham was called because many of the Canaanites were turning away from YAHWEH. Read your Bible. Melchizedek was King-Priest, and he ruled the city called Urasalim or Salem! He was a Jebusite, a tribe from the son of Canaan. They believed in EL SHADDAI, meaning YAHWEH EL ALMIGHTY, THE FATHER! Abraham raise his hands and called out to YAHWEH that he learned from the Amorites they did no sin for 430 years and then the call was for IsraEL to take the land. They died out because they had more insight and still did not follow YAHWEH! They were cursed and are no longer. Japheth would dwell in their place, and they were never told they would worship YAHWEH, and they don't. Their belief is from the Pharisee, a Semitic religion that was not accepted by the followers of YAHSHUA!

Facts💯

No bible verses to prove this. The book of jasher was written by European Rabbis. And not by a prophet.

@@CushiteChristian say my brother look up the book of Jubilees written by the sons of Ham after the flood an how the curse begin it goes into great detail....once u get there look up Noah's sacrifice an Canaan betrayal an you'll see💯

@@CushiteChristian if u only believe the bible than my brother u only see what they want u to see u must see what is not being taught an what is being hidden💯

@@thuggaman8577 ok

Or from Canaan's view. Shem was intruding into his land.

Canaan today is Spanish people Spain Portuguese

@@jeffreydelacruz2154 What makes you say that?Last i read,the western europeans were Iberians.Decended from Japheth.

Canaan doesn't have rights to that land although they were there before the Israelites but that was not Hams nor Canaans rightful land to live in.

It’s was Shem land, God made a Covenant with Abraham Genesis 12:7, When Noah divided the land post flood, HAM got jealous went to war, took the land and name it the land of Cannon(Promise Land), Then story of Moses Happen to fulfilled GOD promise

Then why curse Canaan for Ham's sin?

@@mariussielcken The Children of Noah enter their Districts Canaan seizes Palestine wrongfully (x. 28-36) 28. And Ham and his sons went into the land which he was to occupy, which he acquired as his portion in *the land of the south* ( Noah divided the whole earth among his three sons, generally speaking, Japhet had tje northern part of earth, Sem had the centre, and Ham the southern, these are the African, south American and south Pacific). 1 29. And Canaan saw the land of Lebanon to the river of Egypt that it was very good, and *he went not into the land of his inheritance to the west (that is to) the sea* , 2 and he dwelt in the land of Lebanon, eastward and westward from the border of Jordan and from the border of the sea. 3 30. And Ham, his father, and Cush and Mizraim, his brothers, said unto him: "*Thou hast settled in a land which. is not thine*, *and which did not fall to us by lot*; do not do so; for if thou dost do so, thou and thy sons will fall in the land and (be) accursed through sedition; for by sedition ye have settled, and by sedition will thy children fall, and thou shalt be rooted out for ever. 31. *Dwell not in the dwelling of Shem; for to Shem and to his sons did it come by their lot*. 32. *Cursed art thou*, and cursed shalt thou be beyond all the sons of Noah, by the curse 4 by which we bound ourselves by an oath in the presence of the holy judge, 5 and in the presence of Noah our father." 33. But he did not hearken unto them, and *dwelt in the land of Lebanon from Hamath 6 to the entering of Egypt*, 7 *he and his sons until this day* 34. *And for this reason that land is named Canaan*. This happened after the Babel overthrow, during the days of Peleg, when the children of Noah divided the earth among their sons. (Nothing to do with a geological event or pangea, this account of the division of earth is what Jubilees is giving minute details as to what happened with Canaan specifically : that makes Noah's curse a prophecy, when we see Canaan father and brethren actually cursed him ! Yah bless.

Subdivision of the Three Portions amongst the Grandchildren: Oath taken by Noah's Sons (ix. 1-15; cf. Gen. x. partly). IX. And Ham divided amongst his sons(The African continent) and the first portion came forth for Cush 11 towards the east, and to the west of him for Mizraim, 12 and to the west . p. 77 of him for Put, 1 and to the west of him [and to the west thereof] on the sea 2 for Canaan. 3 2. And Shem also divided amongst his sons, and the first portion came forth for Elam and his sons, to the east of the river Tigris till it approacheth the east, the whole land of India, and on the Red Sea on its coast, and the waters of Dêdân, and all the mountains of Mebrî and ’Êlâ, and all the land of Sûsân and all that is on the side of Pharnâk 4 to the Red Sea and the river Tînâ. 3. And for Asshur came forth the second portion, all the land of Asshur and Nineveh and Shinar and to the border of India, and it ascendeth and skirteth the river. 4. And for Arpachshad came forth the third portion, all the land of the region of the Chaldees to the east of the Euphrates, bordering on the Red Sea, and all the waters of the desert close to the tongue of the sea which looketh towards Egypt, all the land of Lebanon and Sanîr and ’Amânâ 5 to the border of the Euphrates. 5. And for Aram 6 there came forth the fourth portion, all the land of Mesopotamia between the Tigris and the Euphrates to the north of the Chaldees to the border of the mountains of Asshur and the land of ’Arârâ. 7 6. And there came forth for Lud 8 the fifth portion, the mountains of Asshur and all appertaining to them till it reacheth the Great Sea, and till it reacheth the east of Asshur his brother. 7. And Japheth also divided the land of his inheritance amongst his sons. 8. And the first portion came forth for Gomer to the east from the north side to the river Tînâ; and in the north there came forth for Magog all the inner portions of the north until it reacheth to the sea of Mê’at. 9 And p. 78 for Madai came forth as his portion that he should possess from the west of his two brothers to the islands, 1 and to the coasts of the islands. 10. And for Javan 2 came forth the fourth portion every island 3 and the islands which are towards the border of Lud. 11. And for Tubal 4 there came forth the fifth portion in the midst of the tongue which approacheth towards the border of the portion of Lud to the second tongue, to the region beyond the second tongue unto the third tongue. 5 12. And for Meshech came forth the sixth portion, all the region beyond the third tongue 6 till it approacheth the east of Gâdîr. 7 13. And for Tiras 8 there came forth the seventh portion, four great islands 9 in the midst of the sea, which reach to the portion of Ham [and the islands of Kamâtûrî came out by lot for the sons of Arpachshad as his inheritance]. 10 14. *And thus the sons of Noah divided unto their sons in the presence of Noah their father, and he bound them all by an oath, imprecating a curse on every one that sought to seize the portion which had not fallen (to him) by his lot* 15. And they all said, "So be it; so be it," for themselves and their sons for ever throughout their generations till the day of judgment, on which the Lord God shall judge them with a sword and with fire, for all the unclean wickedness of their errors, wherewith they have filled the earth with transgression and uncleanness and fornication and sin. The violation of the oath had the following conséquences : being rooted out of the land and being infested with giants. Yah has been patient (He Always is, everything Happening in it's apointed time). Even when promising thé land to Abraham (restoration of the land to the rightful inheritants), he told him his descendants will return four centuries later to visit the iniquities of the amorites upon their children, Genesis 15. The Canaan conquest by Joshua had the following march order, killing all living things in Canaan. A genocide, by today's perspective, maybe, but taking the historical background in considération, they executed judgement upon thé descendants of Canaan. It's justice. It's the same paradigm by the end times, whether we like it or not. Yah bless.

So because he made up names for animals, he was very intelligent?

​@@_--Reaper--_no because God created him to fellowship with thus created with superior intelligence

Neither one of you is correct. Adam was the name of both the male and the female. They both were to subdue the earth. The word men is a lie and male dominance.

Ham's death is not recorded in the Bible. In my life bar of Ham I have a note that states: "Lifespan extrapolated from Shem." The life-bar of Japheth and Ham are only for visual placement. We know their birth year but not their death year.

Duh the people of Ham went to Africa after the flood. Where's Egypt? In Africa you guessed it where the Egyptians built the Pyramids.

The big problem with Europe's history is yes much of it has been told but the stuff that hasn't yet is probably destroyed by now because we know how much Europe has gone to war over the years.

Because of Ham?...Why?

Migration to different parts of the world...

@@jamellfoster6029 how many years would it take for that to happen?

@@masopha30201 it was possibly a century or so...

@@jamellfoster6029 thank you!

Genetic mutations

I think they had wine in the old world.The first thing Noah did a few years after the flood was make wine out of the grapes he grew.How else would he know how to make wine if he never made any before?

I don't know. There are Shemites all around - Elam, Arphaxad, Asshur, Aram. Nimrod from Ham is present, Nimrod builds Erek (Uruk), and Gilgamesh is king in Uruk.

@@periodictableofhistory116 Could Nimrod also have been called Aga- the ruler over Gilgamesh?

@@periodictableofhistory116 Just a question do you believe nimrod is gilgamesh because from my research nimrod wasn't even his real name and nimrod went by many names.

Yup. And Canaan also isn't pronounced "Kaynen". It's "Kanahn". This guy isn't much of a linguist.

Awawa

@@periodictableofhistory116 thank you

@@periodictableofhistory116 is this the Hawaiian name for King?!

@@periodictableofhistory116 okay I looked it up and it means Valley in Hawaiian. There is a Valley of the Kings.

Namar

Yes!

So they what race...

@@josephodiase174 caucasian but tan, so the same people that live in the middle east today

@@foriegn4life462 shemite are not...

@@josephodiase174 then what are they

Seems to be the best explanation. Thanks.

It would make sense that Canaan is punished because he is the offspring is the rape. This part always causes stumbling! Better clarification is needed!

@@MercyAlwyz23 Noah didn't curse an innocent child because of the sin of his father. He was essentially cursing Ham by saying your line or posterity will be cursed because of your unrighteousness. Noah knew that a man who would commit such wickedness would not raise up his children in righteousness and would bring upon his own children the curse of God through a failure to nature them in the faith and admonition of the Lord. By cursing Cainaan Noah was essentially stating the obvious result that would come from one Generation teaching rising Generations to be wickedness and to not walk in obedience to the Lord. In other words Ham brought upon his children the curse of God through his disobedience and neglect to be a righteous example. Noah was just the mouth piece of the Lord in declaring the reality of consequences Ham would bring upon his own posterity. Did God punish Japheth and Shems posterity? No infact through Noah God stated the obvious fact that both lines would prosper because both Men were known to be righteous and good men. God essentially knew their posterities would be raised to observe God's laws. Cursing Ham would have done little to Ham and it simply would have meant nothing to Ham. To curse his posterity however would certainly drive home and bring to bear the extreme affront Ham had committed. It was literally the only sizeable and proportional consequence that would have caused Ham any amount or remorse or self reflection for his unbelievably damming evil. Lets not forget he raped his own Mother! There are fewer offenses as evil as rape but to violate the chastity of your own Mother is undoubtedly a great offense to God. Ham showed himself to be unworthy of the Priesthood and that he couldn't be trusted with the sacred knowledge of Eternal life. He was therefore cursed indirectly by knowing his posterity would be denied the blessings of life eternal as a direct result of his wickedness. Knowing the choicest blessings of Eternity would be reserved for the posterity of his brothers lines would be something he would have to live with his entire life. Knowing he had disgraced his own name and blackened his posterity with the unforgivable act of desecration perpetuated on his Mother he and his posterity would be hated and thus enslaved and mistreated for generations to come as the natural consequences of his actions. Cursing Ham would have essentially not been a punishment at all. To curse a man's posterity? I cannot think of any greater punishment! Not even eternal damnation. To damn Ham would be one thing. To damn his posterity to the 3rd and 4th generation or possibly longer, and have the sins of all those innocent 😇 children and their blood crying for vengeance upon your head, that is a far worse punishment. Ham will suffer, not just for his sins in hell but for the sins of all those who were cursed as a result of his actions. The blessings they were denied surley led them away from God into paths of unrighteousness and iniquity. All those countless million, who as a result of his wickedness, fell away and committed sin will be forgiven and Ham will have heaped upon his head the sins of them all. His punishment will be as Cains was. It will be more than he can bear and upon the day of judgment he will awnser for it all. Its one thing to suffer for your own sins but lead generations astray and you will suffer unknowable anguish and the wrath of a just God until every measure of his wrath has been placated!!!

Darris you got that one wrong, and it does not make any sense, especially from a biblical perspective. The incident did not involved Noah wife, because the Bible would had honestly specify that. What some scholars speculate, it was Canaan that committed or tried to molest Noah. Ham was overlooked due to telling his brothers, and not scolding his son Canaan due to the incidents, hence Noah curse Canaan due to Canaan perverse nature. Also we do not know the age Canaan was, it could had been a teenager or even and Adult. Also look at the history of Canaan descendants and their sexual practices for example Sodom and Gomorrah, that kind of behavior been past on to his descendants. However, the others sons of Ham was not involved in the incidents, so not curse. Because Noah specifically "curse be Canaan", hence the incident involved Canaan himself. Your interpretation was definitely "off", and not supported by scholars.

@@justcallmebrian793 Leviticus 20:11! You trust the scholars and I will trust God and the Holy Spirit that is in me!

@@darrisellis8810 Genesis Chapter 19:3, Again the nakeness was not Noah wife, but it was Noah himself. Stop trying to add something which is not there.

To put in layman's terms Ham went back to his brothers and mocked the Great Noah because he was naked and drunk such was disrespectful to Yah.

Where do you read Noah was albino?

@@TracyZdelar book of Enoch and and book of Jubilees explain this I believe

I believe Noah was almost luminous, which upset his father, who thought his wife had slept with another man to conceive Noah.

Definitely - I would like more research on this. I also found in Egyptiaca - Menes reigned as first Pharaoh after the Great Flood.

who?? you have a better explanation wheres your sources science lol

if your a shill this is the wrong channel lol

cursed bunch

no ones perfect on this earth It will soon end so finger pointing is useless get over it

I think we love reading much into it. Literally Ham goes and tells his brothers who come and cover Noah. I think We like to add things to the bible that it doesn't say. If you say he slept with his fathers wife then why go and tell your brothers as if to brag. it was simple seeing nakaednes was an abomination considering that their forefather Adam could have passed down the gravity of God covering their nakedness.

@@KingPassionMC telling his brother can be explained or debated for many reasons. Talk about "reading much into it . And to understand on a deep level. You have to read the whole Bible any other books considered Godly inspired. Note, Jesus n his disciples mentioned n quoted from books not in the current Bibles. Go find it. You seen to comment from an uneducated side. Or if that word is to harsh, Unknowledgeable....