Who Was Mary Magdalene? 

Praise God for you my brother! You've restored a faith that was lost 25 years ago relating to the issues u addressed in this video... my relationship with Jesus has been restored... I Will be eternally thankful to u 😇 I've decided to take up studying Theology and teaching to disseminate the truth... in the hope it saves women from suffering like I did for 25 years in the wilderness... bless u... and keep up your inspired work!

Thank you for providing this content. I was born a skeptic but raised Catholic. I've read many books about Judaism, Christianity and Islam and I really enjoy these lectures. Keep up the great work and I wish you much success.

Margaret Starbird and others, state that Mary Magdalene, or 'Magdalene' actually means, 'Tower' and in Gematria, is the 'Holy Spirit'. 'The fish'. Love this, thank you so much.

Greetings, ...I born in Pakistan .... i was 15 y old in high school when i accidently read Bible , infect i have no idea it is Bible at 1st ..... I always question why same story in same book always contradict .... now i learn more , more then 7 years i study NT AS WELL OLD TESTAMENT ;) THANKYOU FOR LEACTURE .... Many question has answer now :)

Beautiful, intelligent and sensitive Soul....tremendously on point...

I'm conservative but I like your lectures, they are very detailed and I learn a lot. God bless!

Thank you very much for your lectures, so informative and clarifying! You just gave me answers to some old questions, thank you again!

The upshot is, KUDOS to you for being circumspect in your explanations without ruining the value so much of this has to people who need a definitive roadmap to add safety to their lives in an ever-changing world.

Thank you John and CP, yall are amazing!

These lectures are pure gold. Thanks.

You are the very best.

I’m not religious at all. But I have always loved this stuff.

Just missed it! About to watch it now!

Many thanks. GOD bless you.

For many years it's been my contention, having delved into interlinear translations, that the reference to the, "beloved/who he loved" disciple was Mary M., particularly from John 19:27 since all it took was to change neutral word to masculine. Also in the "naming" of Simon, the Greek word, according to concordances [Strong's, Thayer's, etc.] was, "petras" rather than, "petra" changing the meaning from, "shard/gravel/pebble" to the universally used, "rock" , which would make sense that Jesus would be making a joke about the conspicuously irascible and slow to understand Simon finally getting something right. Ironic though in light of where the name, "Peter" has been used ever since, eh? Another term that's questionable to me is disciple. disciple - from the Greek mathités which means, "students" or "schoolchildren", in one instance the meaning is specified as the first stage of learning, what we'd call kindergarten. Disciple has come to be understood as ones who completely understand and fully accept the ideology of the teacher.

Thank you so much Centre Place for this enriching content. Quick question: what version or translation of the Bible do you suggest we read? Any specific study Bible that you'd recommend? I typically read from my ESV Study Bible. Thank you so much.

Thank you USAF

Discussing Thomas's last saying... You might like to consider that what we call male is not male but a hybrid male/female mix of half and half, whereas female is XX and total female. All male birds are truly male while all so-called female birds are the equivalent of our XY maleness. Ancient religions were based on unaccountable but REAL patterns.

Thank you so very much 🙏🏻

Feet washing was a hospitality custom throughout the Middle East during the time period of Christ

We Love You.. ❤️ all Are Here Once Again.. You Each are Divine Souls ✨️

Mary Magdalene was a Jews and wife and disciple of Jesus. She wrote a gospel. She ignored that Jesus is a god or son of God.

"There are forces, that are just natural human institutional forces, that continuously cause an institution, or a structure or a tradition to become institutional, structural and traditional but this is actually going against the intent and the teachings that are at the roots of the movement." --John Hamer That's something to write in bold, frame it and hang on a wall. Of any organization or movement. 🙏🙏🙏

Teaching. 7 am, 7 pm. My pupils. My angels. Here.

What about a husbands who has been cheating on me and feels no wrong is done wrong, he is full of sin

This is about the same as debating and theorizing about what Spock was to Captain Kirk 1000 years from now.

Do you think it might be profitable, to include in the discussion the work of Glenn Kimball? While I realize getting ahold of much of his work is difficult following his death (as his family seems to be suppressing the vast catalogue of his recordings), there are still some lectures and interviews up on RU-vid... not to mention two of his three small books. His contention is that there is post-extra-Biblical evidence that Mary the mother of Jesus, Magdaline and Joseph of Arimathea (among several others close to Jesus) fled or were forced out of the Holy Land and migrated to countries up north. I think his insight into records of this migration northward and the impact of their potential presence in northern countries is terribly fascinating and, potentially, very important. For anyone interested in this subject, I would highly recommend taking Glenn's lifetime of work into consideration.

Also, did I understand correctly that we think Mary Magdalene must be historical for the reason that Magdala is not a real place and someone wouldn't invent a non-real place? But wouldn't the non-existence of the village in the historical record at least open the door to invention? I believe the argument is that inventing a non-real place doesn't help someone trying to feign historicity (therefore it must be a real place that didn't make it into the records), but I don't think Mary Magdalene was used as an anchor to history. I think she served a dialectic purpose, and the name Magdalene tells us something about what she represents. Was "woman from Magdala" a Greek colloquialism prior to the gospel stories? I assume it's only because of them, which would mean she's "Mary of the Tower" or something like that. Either way, her character seems to serve the lesson of the story, not represent a historical patron or leader.

Paul didn't say women couldn't be prophets. He said, in fact, that a woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered is shameful. In other words, he acknowledged the fact that women prayed and prophesied in the assembly. He just said they need to wear a head covering. The women who he said should remain silent in the churches were not prophesying or praying but must have been causing a a disturbance of some kind. He said that if they have questions, they need to ask their husbands at home. But prophetesses are well established in the church.

I like the hypothetical extension to the gospel of Thomas.

Thank you. Illuminating.

Thank you for the information you present! Very intriguing! I wonder what a progressive teacher like yourself thinks about the idea of giving in to the desires of "the flesh" and the decisions we as human beings make based on the desire? Should the individual be considered above the collective based on these desires?

Are the Cathars the source of the word cathartic? Sorry for my plethora of questions. I find these lectures fascinating.

The Bible has many characters that today would be simply named as John Does.

Magdal was the town she came from.

Jacapo explains that Syro was a Syrian nobleman, whose wife, Eucharia (Mary's mother), was of royal kindred. He continues, "Mary Magdalene was born of a right noble lineage, and her parents descended from the lineage of Kings." In a much earlier manuscript by Archbishop Rabanus Maurus, Eucharia is more fully detailed as a descendant of the Royal House of Israel. That was not the Davidic House of Judah but the priestly Hasmonaean House of the Maccabees, who reigned in Jerusalem from 166 BC until the Roman occupation of 63 BC under General Pompeii.

REVELATION 14:4These are the ones who did not ·do sinful things [defile themselves] with women, because they ·kept themselves pure [L are virgins]. They follow the Lamb every place he goes MATTHEW 22:30 For in the resurrection neither do men marry nor are women given in marriage, but they are like angels in heaven [who do not marry nor produce children 1 John 3:5You know that He appeared in order to take away sins; and in Him there is no sin.---Holy GOD will not ressurect him if he failed.and will be barred to enter heaven

Thed demons were character defects which all possess in varying degrees! such as anger, anxiery,gteed, lust, dishonesty ,fear,jealousy ....... you name a few!! J

mark is meant to be written contemporarily and is why it is all present tense and why it abruptly ends

I found the book under my add on / trailer in the cane beds Arizona few years ago not to be found till time is right I guess ... Had it in a freezer like bag becuz of it condition being under home for however long .. there is also cannon as part of ut az borders

Odessyus had his feet anointed by a woman named Euraclaeia, which means "known far and wide." Jesus said to the woman who annointed his feet that she would known far and wide.

As I myself am interested in Catastrophism, I’m always drawn to possible esoteric meanings in scripture (and all sorts of traditions ), so I found it interesting that someone else was asking about the anointment of the feet, the meaning of the hair (as rays) and the tears etc. - and also interesting then your explanation that Myrrhe is the pointer to death and the Egg to resurrection (- btw. the egg has a shell that comes off; significance see below). As my favorite interpretation of catastrophism has shifted somewhat away from comet impact to micro-nova, my own question in this story was drawn to the linen / cloth left behind after Christ has risen, and the angel in white cloth. Esoterically death and resurrection of Christ becomes about death and resurrection of the Human Civilization after the last reset, and with the sun being the actor, it becomes ultimately about death and resurrection of the sun. So my interpretation of the left behind linen would be an outer shell / layer of the sun (that may have dimmed the suns light for a time) that gets blown away by an eruption. (Something similar but larger may have recently have happened with the temporary dimming of Betelgeuse). I was recently drawn to repeating in my mind the “Memorial Acclamation” in my head, although I have been considering myself an atheist for more than a decade now, I was actually raised as a believer (I’m German and Lutheran). “We proclaim your Death, O Lord, and profess your Resurrection, until you come again.” In my head it is German of course: “Deinen Tod, oh Herr, verkünden wir. Deine Auferstehung preisen wir, bis Du kommst in Herrlichkeit. - Geheimnis des Glaubens.” “Bis Du kommst in Herrlichkeit.” actually translates as: until you come in Glory. And when I think of Glory, I think of Gloriole = Nimbus, which also conveys the image of a blown away layer with the brightest rays coming from the center. And awaiting that kind of “glory” again at the end of the age points of course to a repeating event / sun cycle. I could go on, how the twelve apostles represent the zodiac, and thus refer to the cycle of the Great Year (see precession of the equinoxes; watch some Randall Carlson for instance), so I thought: maybe Mary Magdalene being the first witness to resurrection might make her also an object on the sky (maybe Venus getting passed by the blown away layer first, so Venus enters the “grave” in a manner of speaking: which would make Mercury “the beloved” Apostle (Mercury is always facing the sun! It stopped revolving around itself)) etc. - there is a whole rathole to go down (Who is Peter? the Earth? Who are the 500? The Asteroid Belt? ). But there it gets complicated: there already is Mary (the mother of god / the virgin sign of the zodiac) on the sky… - but that’s another story. maybe there can be multiple Mary. P.S.: I know: scripture has many layers of text / authors, and also many layers of meaning, and not every layer of text has a correspondence to every layer of meaning. Still it is fun to try to get at the esoteric stuff (especially in John), even if sometimes I’m being anachronistic (or worse) in finding my own layers, that actually aren’t there at all.

In Mark's Gospel a empty tomb was found. This is how Mark's Gospel ends, with an empty tomb. Not with claims of a resurrection and ascension.

11:16 the best evidence luke had matthew is that he corrects the Emmanuel line to just say jesus; because luke recognized that jesus is only called jesus and never Emmanuel

I love the description of Peter as a misogynistic, more or less thug. If Jesus said to Peter, "You are the rock upon which I build my Church," which I was taught Jesus 's Church was the Catholic Church (I was raised and educate d Catholic) the Catholic Church continues to remain exceedingly misogynistic and even contemptuous treatment of women. Something I was never taught but internazilized to my detriment simply by breathing it in through the Catholic ether.. i long ago left snd reputiated the teaching of the Catholic Church.

A good source of information - 'Anna, Grandmother of Jesus' published 2002

I was always fascinated and wondering when women talk about St. MARY MAGDALENE (Mary from Magdala, presently Migdal, Palestine), most of the time they seldom mention, bring up the subject, or drop the issue that the facts, 7 Demons have cast out (expelled/exorcized/drove out) from her... (ref. Luke 8:2)... Most women firmly denied she was a former Adulterer or Prostitute, because it was not directly said in the Bible... Christ said, the Tax Collectors and Prostitutes will go ahead to the Kingdom of Heaven than those self-righteous Pharisees and Sadducees... (ref. Matt. 21:31). Do you think any woman possessed with 7 Demons is not capable of the Sin of Adultery, Fornication, or Prostitution?... It would be tough to believe that she was not capable of at least committing one of those SINS, wherein, in those days, women's roles were mainly Housewives for the main purpose of giving HEIRS to their own husbands' LINEAGE... Facts and Truth of the Matters, Biblically and Logically speaking... Amen.

Blood of Jesus Christ is wine , flesh of juses is bread,after age of twelve priest give us in felt hand upon right hand on name chirst Jesus we signal with hand cross with Jesus Christ blessings

Jesus is Lord. Stop blaspheming against God support homosexuality while still claiming you believe in God “Choose today whom you must serve”

There's an Eastern Orthodox legend regarding the egg, where Mary visits Emperor Tiberius, and the egg changes color in her hand when Tiberius doubts her story of the resurrection.

GIVEN THAT EVEN IN THE CHURCH OF PETER HE WAS A COWARD IN THE GOSPLES I`M SHOCKED HOW ANYONE WOULD LOOK UP TO HIM FOR GUIDANCE!

people have been messed up about sex forever. what a freakish cultural accident for so many people to warp their lives around.

"There's no reason to create a character from Magdala or Nazareth" as a writer I find this to be a bit of a silly assumption. I intentionally write characters from no-where towns, often for no reason other than personal enjoyment. It makes the story more human, more interesting, more believable.

Pompeia Paulina, her 'housekeeping sister' is Poppea Sabina.

How DaVinci code Raked $$$ out of this woman🐇Mark gospel is one of the markings and love it🙏🔥❤️

Great lecture. I have just discovered these and will be watching more of them. One question, though., Why does this lecturer seem so sure that the authors of Matthew and Luke were not aware of each other? I know this is a popular view, but by no means a fact.

So we have two prominent but mysterious figures in John's Gospel, The disciple Jesus loved and Mary Magdalene. Here's an idea. The beloved disciple is emphasised because he is the writer or narrator and Mary Mg is emphasised perhaps because she is the person who relayed a lot of these stories and information...there has to be a reason why Mary Mg is emphasised so much.

I was waiting for the Da Vinci Code. 😅

Luke said Jesus appeared to "Simon" (not Peter). That could have been Simon Cleopas, one of the guys on the road to Emmaus. He's also mentioned in John's gospel at the foot of the cross (Cleophas).

Where did Mary exist outside of the bible?

"Apart from the fact that Jesus was said to love Mary Magdalene, there is not much in the gospels to indicate their intimate closeness until Mary appears with Jesus’s mother and Salome (the consort of Simon Zelotes) at the Crucifixion. Not so, however, and the gospel of Philip, where the relationship between Jesus and Mary is openly discussed: "And the companion of the savior is Mary Magdalene. But Christ loved her more than all the disciples, and used to kiss her often on the mouth. The rest of the disciples were offended by it and expressed disapproval. They said unto him, why do you love her more than all of us, the Savior answered and said to them, why do I not love you like her? ... great is the mystery of marriage - for without it the world would not have existed. Now the existence of the world depends on man, and the existence of man on marriage." P. 70 Bloodline of the Holy Grail by Lawrence Gardner

Helloo🧡 If you had the chance to ask Mary Magdalene a question, what would you ask her??

I've read a theory that "Magdalene" is actually a nickname meaning "Tower". I don't know if there's any Historical basis for this. I've only read this in all those weird gnostic Mary magdalene goddess books.

When you translate something into a new language you lose some of the meaning ..

There are a few things wrong here referring to Mark. @8:00 - Jesus mother is not unnamed. - the women are not led by Mary Magdalene. She is just the first listed. in all 3 mentions. - not just the family is painted in a bad light. Mark also paints Jesus in a bad light. - the most obvious feature in Mark has been left out: the end mirrors the beginning. there is a simple reason for this behavour: Mark was a deconverted ex-christian. And he tells all the reasons to his deconverion in an allegorical way. Overall i would say it is a comprehensive good introduction, even considering alternative views.

Being a witness to the risen Christ is not the be-all-and-end-all qualification for an apostle. Lots of people had seen Jesus after His resurrection but not all of them were apostles. "Because I say so" is not the basis for strong doctrine.

I had a problem with the missing no wife until I read about the Essenes. Their teachers were encouraged to be celibate.

The Gospel of Jesus was originally one book, written by Lazarus in consultation with the Apostles [John 21:24] and published soon after Jesus left them on their own. The religion was hijacked by Rome, the Gospel was broken up scrambled adulterated into a bunch of competing narratives. Later four of those adulterated gospels were canonized with falsely ascribed authorship and a Gnosticism cover-story. It was the finding of an original Gospel of Jesus scroll in Jerusalem that gained the Knights Templar power over the Church and their eventual undoing when the church finally retaliated against them Friday 13th.

The Joseph of Arimathea stuff is probably untrue. Jesus was most likely thrown in a mass grave along with other "criminals".

Mary Magdalene was a witch, the initiator of one small field that died in wars, from the first day of the old Stone Age, a branch of the family that planted seeds and plants in the ground, whose men had died many times and places in wars, robberies, revolutions, coups, villages in the regions, and men without lineage, gave birth to many daughters of the lineage because of the missing male part in the genome, but the man was absent, and for this reason the women behaved strangely in the opinion of others, because the lover is not to be found in the natural rhythms found in our genes, and those who wandered alone in search of a lonely man strangely alone were called witches in Europe. Thus began Mary Magdalene's life, to whom came the pitiful Joseph and put Mary, through whom through Mary came the bread boy, Christ, the name Jesus Christ, who is a branch of the fisherman's lineage, who also ate bearded vultures, the river Niilo, the Egyptian region.

Why not mention that resurrection was a Greek Eluesinian ritual. An OOBE/NDE?

What I want to know is, why did Yeshua call Yahweh the satan of Eden, he even said that ALL who came before me are liers en thieves, he said that the murder of Moses people aka Yahweh is also a lier in the Genesis, who lied to Adam and Eve? Yahweh did.. John 8:44 no one has been able to debunk this with true language

She wouldnt go to oint Things to his body if she didnt have a special relation

Was Mary still a Virgin after giving birth to James , brother of Jesus?

10:30 its actually a christian apologetic to explain why matthew and luke share while pretending luke didnt also have matthew ; which he did

I have a cold. I better stay home tonight

Some scholars think that Mary "mother of James and Joses" is Mary mother of Jesus. Salome one of Jesus' sisters and this James and Joses are Jesus' brothers...all present at the death and burial as a family.

One very important fact that all leave out is All the people close o Jesus were Essenes

Mary Magdalene was a preacher, that is how she met HIM, by going to his secret teachings.

Where did Mary M exist outside of the Bible? Otherwise, your discussing a character in a story, within a story. One needs to bring validity of her existence.

1:16:00 So there we have it, an hour and 16 minutes in: conservative Christian fundamentalists miss the entire point of Christianity. 👍 ;) I completely agree but still thought it amusing because John is usually exceptionally diplomatic. 💖 😅

Great talks, thank you. Bit curious as to why it says ‘Mary mother of James the younger and of Joses and not mother of the most prominent figure, Jesus (Yeshua). 🤔

My research indicates that The Beloved Disciple whom Jesus is speaking about while on the cross is indeed Mary Magdalene. Mary was Christ’s wife and the two of them were a complete Soul, composed of both female and male energies. Mary Magdalene and The Christ were Twin Flames. So, when Christ was telling his mother that his beloved disciple would now be her son, he meant that as long as Mary lived, He was in her. She was taking his place because He lived in her!! He would never be gone as long as Mary lived. Sandra Embleton

The making male could refer to adulthood in the Roman world. Christ's revelations are meant to make children of God into brothers and sisters of Christ.

Is it like nobody is going to check anything someone says because less than 1% of the words in the bible are spoken by women. Mary mother of Jesus spoke four times. At least two of the times she speaks Jesus rebukes her. Paul thinks very highly of a woman in one of the churches he visited and then famously tells women to be quiet ( probably a scribal insertion). It was only after Adam rejected the animals that God decided to make Eve out of Adams spare parts. In America the various religions stood opposed to a woman's right to vote.

Ecclesiastes 3:15: “That which is, already has been; that which is to be, already has been; Demands timelessness master time, women was meaning to Flesh needs, or what Spiritual has no time on means covenants since creation.

I thought the give us this day our daily bread was the bread of life. To be cleansed and free from all lies and encompassing the soul fully and completely. Begging for food is a very strange interpretation. Perhaps a leap of faith? The bird God feeds daily without man's interjections?

Fun morning lessons!!!

The Bible says that Mary, the mother of Jesus, had the unique privilege of giving birth to him while she was still a virgin. The Bible foretold this miracle in the book of Isaiah and reported its fulfillment in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. In a prophecy about the appearance of the Messiah, Isaiah foretold: “Look! The young woman will become pregnant and will give birth to a son.” (Isaiah 7:​14) Under divine inspiration, the Gospel writer Matthew applied Isaiah’s prophecy to Mary’s conception of Jesus. After reporting that Mary miraculously became pregnant, Matthew added: “All of this actually came about to fulfill what was spoken by Jehovah through his prophet, saying: ‘Look! The virgin a will become pregnant and will give birth to a son, and they will name him Immanuel,’ which means, when translated, ‘With Us Is God.’”​-Matthew 1:​22, 23. The Gospel writer Luke also reported Mary’s miraculous pregnancy. He wrote that God sent the angel Gabriel “to a virgin promised in marriage to a man named Joseph of David’s house, and the name of the virgin was Mary.” (Luke 1:​26, 27) Mary confirmed that she was a virgin. After hearing that she was to become the mother of Jesus, the Messiah, Mary asked: “How is this to be, since I am not having sexual relations with a man?”​-Luke 1:​34. How could a virgin birth happen? Mary’s pregnancy came about by means of holy spirit, which is God’s power in action. (Matthew 1:​18) Mary was told: “Holy spirit will come upon you, and power of the Most High will overshadow you. And for that reason the one who is born will be called holy, God’s Son.” b (Luke 1:​35) God miraculously transferred his Son’s life to the womb of Mary, causing her to conceive a child. What was the purpose of the virgin birth? God used the virgin birth to provide Jesus with a perfect human body so that Jesus could save mankind from sin and death. (John 3:​16; Hebrews 10:5) God transferred Jesus’ life to the womb of Mary. Thereafter, God’s holy spirit evidently shielded the developing embryo from acquiring any imperfection.​-Luke 1:​35. Jesus was thus born a perfect human, an equal to what Adam had been before he sinned. The Bible says of Jesus: “He committed no sin.” (1 Peter 2:​22) As a perfect man, Jesus could pay the ransom to redeem humans from sin and death.​-1 Corinthians 15:21, 22; 1 Timothy 2:​5, 6. Did Mary remain a virgin? The Bible does not teach that Mary was ever-virgin, or a perpetual virgin. Rather, it shows that Mary had other children.​-Matthew 12:46; Mark 6:3; Luke 2:7; John 7:5. Mary and Joseph with Jesus and his siblings The Bible teaches that Jesus had a number of siblings Was Jesus’ virgin birth the “Immaculate Conception”? No. According to the New Catholic Encyclopedia, the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception “designates the belief that the Virgin Mary was free from ORIGINAL SIN from the very beginning of her life, i.e., from her conception. The rest of mankind inherits a human nature infected with sin . . . But Mary was, by a unique GRACE, preserved from ever contracting original sin.” c By contrast, nowhere does the Bible teach that Mary was free from original sin. (Psalm 51:5; Romans 5:​12) In fact, Mary gave evidence that she was sinful when she presented the sin-atoning sacrifice that the Mosaic Law required of mothers. (Leviticus 12:​2-8; Luke 2:​21-​24) The New Catholic Encyclopedia states: “The Immaculate Conception is not taught explicitly in Scripture . . . [It] is a judgment that the Church has made.” How should we view Mary? Mary set a fine example of faith, obedience, humility, and deep spirituality. She is among the faithful ones whom we do well to imitate.​-Hebrews 6:​12. Yet, despite her unique role as the mother of Jesus, the Bible does not teach that we should worship Mary or pray to her. Jesus did not single out his mother for special honor, nor did he tell his followers to do so. In fact, outside of the Gospel accounts and a single reference in the book of Acts, Mary is not mentioned in the remaining 22 books of the so-called New Testament.​-Acts 1:​14. The Scriptures provide no evidence that Mary received special attention​-let alone veneration​-by first-century Christians. Rather, the Bible teaches Christians to worship only God.​-Matthew 4:​10. a The Hebrew word rendered “young woman” in Isaiah’s prophecy is ʽal·mahʹ, which can refer to either a virgin or a nonvirgin woman. However, under divine inspiration, Matthew used the more specific Greek word par·theʹnos, which means “virgin.” b Some object to the use of the term “God’s Son,” believing that it implies that God had sexual relations with a woman. However, this idea is not taught in the Scriptures. Rather, the Bible calls Jesus “God’s Son” and “the firstborn of all creation” because he was the first and only one created directly by God. (Colossians 1:​13-​15) The Bible also refers to the first man, Adam, as the “son of God.” (Luke 3:38) This was because Adam was created by God.

Is every exchange between the apostles dialectic? Is anything in the gospels not dialectic? How late could the gospels conceivably be? Is it all too late to preserve historical information, because that's not what it was trying to do? Could it be that the gospels are trying to grant authority in the great argument for which "new" traditions should win out following the destruction of the 2nd temple and the Roman decimation of Jerusalem?

I am... Sorry.... (And not) I Am troubled that you cannot see the connection here. Those who 'seen Jesus in the flesh' were able to believe and understand Jesus because He is the 'word' or the 'law'. Where Paul was such an awesome 'lawyer' - that his vision which had 'scales' (of judgement) only needed a 'perspective' change in order for Paul to 'see the Truth'. Yes. I am a 'prophet'. ...and you are running out of time. Shalom.

For St Michael 's Kate

When Jesus said, My wife,... He was talking about His family, the Church ❤

Out of town away from airport

You stated that Jesus, mother didn't believe he the was the saver. Why did they feel that way

JESUS HAD A SON VIA MARY MAG John 19:25-27 25 Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother[Mary], and his mother's sister[in-law], Mary the wife of Cleophas[mother Mary's brother], and Mary Magdalene. 26 When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by[Mary Magdalene], whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy [grand]son! [in Mary Mag's womb/pregnant.] 27 Then saith he to the disciple[Mary Mag], Behold thy mother[in-law/Jesus' mother Mary]! And from that hour that disciple[Mary Mag] took her[Jesus' mother] unto his[Jesus'] own home [The home of Jesus and his now pregnant wife Mary Magdalene] in a midwifing arrangement.

I live another 30 years free

Save yourself a lot of work and analysis and read Dr Barbara Thiering no one has ever disproven her work

This presentation was filled with much information and the presenter here did a great job. However, his bias with regards to weather or not Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene, came through unapologetically and in my estimation, was a discredit to him. The Bible can be read and studied by anyone. It can only be UNDERSTOOD IN THE HIGHER FREQUENCIES OF LOVE.

Christ said so 2 notes ago when I died