Тёмный

Why America’s New Submarine is their Secret Weapon 

Task & Purpose
Подписаться 1,7 млн
Просмотров 1,5 млн
50% 1

Go to buyraycon.com/... for 20% off your order! Brought to you by Raycon.
This ballistic missile submarine is slated to replace the aging Ohio Class subs currently in use. Second only to aircraft carriers, nuclear powered submarines are the most complex craft of the American arsenal. They are a major player in American global military strategy, and how the United States plans to keep its edge against other major world players such as China. When we think of the United States military being used in an international political capacity, we typically think air craft carrier groups sent to another nation’s coastline, or troops deployed to potential conflict zones, but rarely are submarines mentioned in this, despite the fact that they are a critical lynch pin in what is known as America’s nuclear triad.
Written by: Chris Cappy and Justin Taylor
Edited by: Savvy Studios
In short, the nuclear triad is a nation's way of guaranteeing that it never loses the ability to use its nuclear arsenal. This include first ground launched land based nuclear silos, second long range stealth bombers like the B2 or new B21, and third submarine launched nuclear ballistic missiles. When these capabilities are arranged like this it gives you a triangle which is my favorite shape of deterrence. Without any one of these options you would not have a credible hypothetical retaliation. Submarines would survive an enemies first strike of nuclear weapons against the mainland of the United States and be able to retaliate.
In game theory this hypothetically prevents an enemy from ever using its weapons in the first place. Although, Even though I have a bit of the ‘tism even I know people do not operate logically and rationally like game theory robots. Basically The theory is that the enemy could knock out one of your delivery options with a first strike against you but likely never all three at the same time. The US navy puts it this way. The Submarines are operated in a manner that makes their locations unpredictable, while still ensuring that our adversaries know that we have the ability to hold them at risk. This enduring, certain deterrent force acts as an important stabilizer; it is always there and always at the ready.
Task & Purpose is a military news and culture oriented channel. We want to foster discussion about the defense industry.
Email capelluto@taskandpurpose.com for inquires.
#SUBMARINE #NAVY #WAR

Опубликовано:

 

26 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 2,7 тыс.   
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose Год назад
This is my first time covering Naval Vessels I'm still learning! Go to buyraycon.com/taskandpurpose for 20% off your order! Brought to you by Raycon.
@ansonellis443
@ansonellis443 Год назад
Do video on 🇬🇪 Georgia
@brokeandtired
@brokeandtired Год назад
"the lead boat of the class, will be an estimated $6.2 billion (fiscal 2010 dollars)." "The total lifecycle cost of the entire class is estimated at $347 billion" Also its an ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) with an attack sub capability. Even with inflation since 2010 its not $132bn per sub. PS: Virginia Class are the dedicated attack subs.
@RedKytten
@RedKytten Год назад
Small editing mistake at about 4 minutes. You added an extra 0 too the size of the Earth.
@benbaselet2026
@benbaselet2026 Год назад
It really shows you don't do marine stuff. Others do it better. Maybe better to find topics that involve marine assets without trying to go balls deep into the subject for little gain? Especially subs are stuff that even surface fleet people don't really seem to grasp.
@otterpossum9128
@otterpossum9128 Год назад
Dude, you are smarter than to note that the Russian or Chinese navy is in any way close to the US. Drink that cold war era special cool aid?
@garygeorge9648
@garygeorge9648 Год назад
You can't keep all 12 subs out at the same time. You need enough for rotations, repairs and outfitting and crew rest and training.
@HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle
something we are going to lack if recruitment can't get enough
@BobConnor-n2g
@BobConnor-n2g Год назад
Well the Navy always had trouble with recruiting, more so even than the Army. Something about being a "swabbie" is kind of a turn off, knowing you will be swabbing that deck.
@nathanahubbard1975
@nathanahubbard1975 Год назад
@@BobConnor-n2g I never heard anyone say "swabbie" the entire time I was in the Navy. I don't think that is actually a Navy term. They did sometimes say "squid" though. And besides, I'd far rather have been swabbing a deck than stripping and painting it.
@BobConnor-n2g
@BobConnor-n2g Год назад
@@nathanahubbard1975 I heard an ex Marine use the term swabbie for the Navy. I did hear that sailors spend a lot of time rust removing and painting.
@timtrewyn453
@timtrewyn453 Год назад
For some time each SLBM submarine had a Blue crew and a Gold crew. The subs were reliable enough that they were ready to return to sea before a single crew would be ready to do so. So two crews ensured maximum time at sea for the SLBM sub itself. I don't know if that is still the practice.
@jpierce2l33t
@jpierce2l33t Год назад
Great video, but small correction - the Navy would most likely use Virginia class attack subs to chase away flotillas. The Columbia class, like the Ohio before, are Nuke bois...the torpedoes are for defense of the submarine.
@jpierce2l33t
@jpierce2l33t Год назад
@@Freedom_Half_Off yeah of course I didn't mean they'd be out there alone lol..sorry if that wasn't clear. Just mainly pointing out that the torpedoes are for defense of the nuke subs, and that they wouldn't send them for that purpose.
@grahamstrouse1165
@grahamstrouse1165 Год назад
Yeah, that is a pretty huge mistake. The Columbia’s aren’t supposed to get anywhere near an enemy formation.
@timtrewyn453
@timtrewyn453 Год назад
I wonder if less costly sea drones and AI will make ASW much more potent than it is today. The ocean is a big place, but it is finite, and if the drones are numerous enough, the subs will find it harder to hide and with less time to launch their own attack. A drone sub could connect to a mother drone or ship for battery recharging, diagnostics, and repair and then return to its search program. If it finds something, then it surfaces and starts transmitting its data. It could deploy sonobuoys to maintain contact. Maybe a torpedo can take out the drone, but that can also telegraph the submarine operating area and attract other drones. The drone itself could have some kind of ASW weaponry. I don't think survival gets easier with time for these large, manned submarines.
@jacobp8294
@jacobp8294 Год назад
​@@Freedom_Half_OffI think the video did a good job explaining their purpose, the torpedo and further tech explanations felt like a breakdown of developed technologies, etc.
@roaminromer
@roaminromer Год назад
Came here to say this. Ballistic missile subs hide, while attack sub seek.
@javabean215
@javabean215 Год назад
I was on an older 1960s Polaris sub, and later a plankowner of a Trident sub (1980s). The difference in technology between those two was like comparing a wooden man-o-war to an Iowa class battleship. They had the same basic "stuff"...but everything on the Trident boat was leaps and bounds quieter, easier to use/repair/maintain, and significantly more capable in operation and capability. It's amazing what lessons you can learn in 20 years of real-world operation. I can only guess at some of the advances that the next generation will be putting to sea with. I know China thinks they have current-generation capable subs, but we've learned the hard lessons and incorporated them; not only in equipment (plans for some of which China may have "acquired" over the years) but in procedures, tactics, operation, and damage control. Brittan is peer level, and France not far behind them, with the Aussies gaining ground....all through allied cooperation. There's no adversarial naval force on the planet that can currently pose a significant threat to the combined US deterrent sub force, let alone a combined allied force. An enemy *might* be able to locate and even sink one deterrent sub, but heaven help anyone who throws the first rock in the near future. And don't even get me started on the attack subs.......
@dynestis2875
@dynestis2875 Год назад
What about the attack subs?
@Rambam1776
@Rambam1776 Год назад
I served on an LA, and I've spoken to folks who are the Virginias. Told me stuff they shouldn't. Same as you - night and day
@javabean215
@javabean215 Год назад
@@dynestis2875 while the boomers are designed for stealth, long term autonomous operation, and delivering missiles with pinpoint precision, the attack subs are designed for stealthily finding, tracking, and killing if necessary, adversary ships and subs. They have a lot of the same lessons learned, but much more cutting edge sonar and weapons systems. And the skilled crew to accomplish that. Their missions don't typically require them to stay at sea as long as boomers without port stops, so they don't need as much room for food and such; and they don't have to have an entire compartment dedicated to missiles. They can stuff significantly more high tech stuff into a smaller overall sub.
@richbattaglia5350
@richbattaglia5350 Год назад
I like your confidence with our current submarine systems. A point of concern would be to weight that in an active combat environment.
@JO-xt3om
@JO-xt3om Год назад
@@richbattaglia5350 One of the things that you need to understand about the sub service is that even during times of "peace," they (the sub service) are always in war mode. That is the point 24/7.
@forrestsory1893
@forrestsory1893 Год назад
I've been on several boats. There is no graffiti anywhere in the head of a Submarine. Fun fact when I was assigned to the Dainel Webster she was was in dry dock the interior panels were removed. Part of the steel bulkhead was exposed for the first time since construction in the early 1960s. The dockworkers left painted some unflatering remarks and pictures about The Soviet Union. This part of the bulkhead had not been seen for over 30 years 😂
@Kevin-zt7lb
@Kevin-zt7lb Год назад
Another important factor for fleet size is the rule of thirds. Only about 1/3 of your fleet is available for operations at any one time. 1/3 is in maintenance and repair and the final third is breaking in new crews and equipment. In an emergency you can surge that final third out in a somewhat underprepared state. So having 14 subs really means you only have 4-5 on station at a time.
@TheSubdude123
@TheSubdude123 Год назад
Not in the case of the Ohio class, there were two bases Kings Bay Georgia and Bangor Washington, with at one point 8 subs each, then a couple were converted into SSGN's. The Ohio class actually had two separate crews, Blue and Gold crews so the subs spent more time underway than any other platform ever developed. I did 16 Strategic Deterrent Patrols of about 70-80 days each. There where at most three subs in port that I can remember.. The maintenance and upkeep was done by both crews in a 30 day refit period. They spent a majority of the life cycle under water.
@richinoregon
@richinoregon Год назад
When I was in the Navy I was responsible for working up acoustic propagation predictions, "maps" if you will of where subs can hide. It's scary. The chances are very low that a sub can be found before it can do damage. As an example, I was on the USS Midway which was conducting flight operations. A mile behind us was a cruiser in 'plane guard' position to pick up any pilots who might have to eject. The weather observer, who had to remain on the 'roof' while flight ops were in progress, after they were over came down to the weather office and asked the weather officer what a periscope looked like. The Wx officer asked him why and he replied that he thought that he had seen one. The Wx officer and the observer then ran back up to 'the roof' and sure enough between our ship and the 'plane guard' there was a periscope. It was a "friendly" trying to see how long it would take to be spotted. None of the lookouts on either ship had spotted the periscope. BTW, the aircraft on a carrier make so much noise that it drowns out the noise that a sub would make. If it had been an 'unfriendly' it would have sunk both the Midway and the 'plane guard.' The question is would it have remained undetected after that point?
@anydaynow01
@anydaynow01 Год назад
Yeah it is spooky how silent the attack subs are, and the boomers take that to a whole new level!
@jamesh1641
@jamesh1641 Год назад
USS Midway went out of service in 1992. That’s 31 years ago. Technology has improved. That’s why you watched this video.
@actionjksn
@actionjksn Год назад
Why didn't someone asked the weather guy if he had ever watched a war movie with submarines? I mean if you've ever watched these type of movies which all men should have watched before adulthood, he would know what the Periscope looks like.
@piersonjamesa
@piersonjamesa Год назад
Tbh its kinda surprising that anyone spotted a periscope depending on the weather, your inherently talking about a pipe that is at most a foot or so in diameter and maybe a couple of feet at most above the surface, in ocean waves. Unless you saw a reflection of sunlight its hard to detect anything on the open ocean that dosen't have a decent footprint. Would be interesting to see if any navy specifically scouted for fisherman for that duty thru the years as they would have the most experience in spotting changing conditions on the surface.
@solomonofakkad1927
@solomonofakkad1927 Год назад
@@piersonjamesa I think a bigger problem is that the chance of you having a warship in the area is extremely unlikely. Even if hypothetically a submarine is loud and can be seen from the satellite, if it's located in the ocean, you wouldn't really be able to do anything about it in short notice because you don't have the weapon that have enough range and/or responsive enough to deal with it before it could launch its own ballistic missiles, and modern SLBMs do a range about one-third the circumference of the Earth. By the time you could manage to sink that submarine, it'll pointless because you're attacking a submarine that already emptied its payload and its missiles already destroyed your country.
@davied202
@davied202 Год назад
Fun fact: there are more planes underwater than submarines in the air.
@funveeable
@funveeable Год назад
There are more submarines underwater than submarines in the world's Navies. Every ship can be a submarine once. Only those who are actual submarines can come back up.
@nevtheskid4579
@nevtheskid4579 Год назад
@@funveeable Most famously, the Yamato and the Bismarck have become quality habitats for marine life.
@charlesbrightman4237
@charlesbrightman4237 Год назад
Consider the following: Remote and AI controlled single use unmanned subs with a 'device' onboard. Could hug the bottom if necessary and then go vertical underneath a ship. No ship would be safe, not even aircraft carriers. Bridges and ports as well. And with AI timed controlled, one moment in time everything okay and a nation has a powerful navy, next moment in time, not so much.
@charlesbrightman4237
@charlesbrightman4237 Год назад
Consider also though: ONLY a successful pro-active space program will potentially save any life on and from this Earth, all other life forms, real and artificial, will die and go extinct with a high degree of certainty. EXISTENTIAL PHYSICS: Current Analysis: (subject to revision as new information might dictate): WARNING: NOT FOR ALL AUDIENCES: Only read this if you think you can handle it. Future: a. 6th mass extinction event (possibly occurring now), and the 6th won't be the last. (And 'yes', at least some humans will survive these earlier mass extinction events). b. Sun becomes a red giant one day as it switches from burning hydrogen to burning helium and will wipe out all life left on this Earth if not even the entire Earth itself. (And 'yes', a long time from now, but the destination is set like a way point on a journey). c. Our spiral shaped galaxy is most probably collapsing in upon itself, (note: adding to the red shift observations by the way), and it's possible ALL galaxies eventually collapse in upon themselves (not confirmed yet). d. 'If' one believes in the big bang theory, and space itself expanding, then the entire universe and all in it will most probably end in a big freeze. (And 'yes', a long time from now, but the destination would be set like a way point on a journey). Note also: the singular big bang is probably not really true, there are other 'normal' explanations for the red shift observations, and the universe is most probably not going to end in a big freeze. Also, 'if' the current forces of nature came into existence in the early moments of the expansion of the singularity, and the singularity is still basically expanding, then the forces of nature will probably evolve one day, possibly even in the very next moment of expansion of this universe, and possibly wipe out everything in existence in basically a blink of an eye. Of which note also, the forces of nature as well as the universe always existed and never had a beginning. But 'if' modern science is correct, well ....................................blink........................................... e. Outer space travel: Currently impossible to do for long periods of time due to: 1. Harmful cosmic radiation, including any potential neutrino impacts. (While most neutrinos go right through us, not all of them do all of the time). AI and biological life would most probably not survive unless proper protections were had. 2. Biological species, especially humans, need proper gravity conditions and large rotating space ships probably will not work for space bases on planets and moons. Otherwise, biological life, especially humans, will not survive long term. 3. Biological species, especially humans, need many more items to properly survive, otherwise they won't. * Note: If anybody has any actual factual evidence to counter the above, I welcome it. ** HAVE A NICE DAY IF THAT IS WHAT YOU CHOOSE TO HAVE, WHILE WE HAVE DAYS LEFT THAT WE CAN ENJOY. FOR EVERY MOMENT THAT PASSES, ONE LESS MOMENT BEING ALIVE AND ONE MOMENT CLOSER TO BEING NOT ALIVE.
@charlesbrightman4237
@charlesbrightman4237 Год назад
And let's not forget the US Fed with their 'goal' of actually having higher economic inflation. Space travel has gotten more expensive just in my time on this Earth. What is space travel going to cost in the next 100, 1000, 1 million years from now? Economic inflation might just be a contributing factor to all life on and from this Earth dying and going extinct. And 'we' did it to ourselves, or more correctly, the US Fed did it to 'us' including themselves. Idiots.
@esquared5064
@esquared5064 Год назад
There are actually 18 Ohio class subs in active service. 14 are classified as SSBN but 4 are classified as SSGN as they went through upgrades to allow the new designation.
@bbeen40
@bbeen40 Год назад
Those 4 are now non nuclear so they dont really count in the nuclear triad discussion.
@esquared5064
@esquared5064 Год назад
@@bbeen40 they can hold over 130 tomahawks which are nuclear capable. They just are no longer balistic missile capable.
@gigakrait5648
@gigakrait5648 11 месяцев назад
@@esquared5064 Wrong. Nuclear capability of Tomahawks (BGM-109A) was removed in 2010-2013. They are no longer in service as such.
@External2737
@External2737 10 месяцев назад
They replaced 24 trident with 144 cruise missles. Bwaa haha. As Ohios are replaced, cruise missiles.
@Natobot9000
@Natobot9000 Месяц назад
​@@gigakrait5648yeah that was due to reduction agreements. The Russians said they were no longer following the new start agreement. How long do you think it would take to add those capabilities back?
@colepreszler
@colepreszler 8 месяцев назад
I'm still thinking about what we could do with 26 million Toyota Camrys
@STWLandO
@STWLandO Год назад
That "oh cool I'm anywhere in the world" was underrated as an incredible line
@lostphotographs3936
@lostphotographs3936 7 месяцев назад
100% agree.
@YoniBaruch-y3m
@YoniBaruch-y3m 6 месяцев назад
“A triangle… my favorite shape of deterrence.” Just as good, in my view.
@jjnix9517
@jjnix9517 Год назад
Overkill is important to maintain the threat, they need to know even if they can shoot down half the missles they'll still be completely destroyed.
@Lonewolfmike
@Lonewolfmike Год назад
There's no kill like overkill.
@silentvoiceinthedark5665
@silentvoiceinthedark5665 Год назад
This is why you need dummy missiles, either real ones or fake ones that show up only on radar. Our electronic warfare system can show up as two projectiles when have 20 coming down on them. I am confidant in our weapons systems. Former Navy squid
@eyeborg3148
@eyeborg3148 Год назад
Oh please it’s not like our previous nuclear submarines weren’t already capable of destroying the whole world several times over. This is just more propaganda from the military industrial complex. I can already feel the money leaving my wallet.
@joelsalinas6905
@joelsalinas6905 Год назад
@@silentvoiceinthedark5665 im genuinely surprised we havent fielded a type of swarm thing to trick radars
@jacobp8294
@jacobp8294 Год назад
​@@joelsalinas6905the issue is that you would need to deliver those resources alongside your weapons, meaning that essentially you would drop dummy bombs with real bombs, and at that point you might as well put gunpowder in them, making them no longer dummy bombs.
@RoberinoSERE
@RoberinoSERE 11 месяцев назад
I was on the third Ohio ship when it was brand new in 1984. We carried the the UGM-96 Trident 1 with 8 W76 100kt warheads in all 24 missile tubes. 24 of these Ohios were slated to replace 41 older SSBNs of 5 classes built since 1959. The cold war reduced this to 18 finished and the first 4 were converted during a 12 year refueling to SSGB with 7 Tamahawks per missile tube x 24 tubes. Building a 560ft Columbia to match the Size of Ohio with only 16 Missiles instead of 24 better mean we get a Sauna like the Soviet Typhoons.
@jonathandeschenes2973
@jonathandeschenes2973 Год назад
I live down the road from General Dynamics and it’s pretty cool to see the transport trucks delivering the nuclear cores for the engines
@gj1234567899999
@gj1234567899999 Год назад
I actually agree we need more Ohio class type subs. If you look deeply into our nuclear deterrent system, it becomes clear that our nuclear subs are the most capable system of the nuclear triad since our nuclear bombers can be shot down, and our silos have long been identified and can be targeted.
@cedriceric9730
@cedriceric9730 Год назад
To the contrary , silos are notorious targets , some will absorb direct hits and still launch , they will also likely be empty by the time the enemy warhead strikes . Having the enemy know where they are increases their usefulness instead . They are so threatening russia plans to use almost a full megaton to destroy single silos😂
@TroutofHate
@TroutofHate Год назад
This is a cost-benefit question. An Ohio class SSBN costs about $3bn (2021) per unit while there is literature saying that the cost to build 150 Minutemen silos in SD cost $75M. No year was given for the silos construction but assuming the silos were constructed around 1962 (the year Minuteman I entered service) inflation would bring that to $673M (2021). I would also assume the operating cost for SSBNs would be MUCH higher. 1 Ohio = 20tubes x12MIRVs = 240 warheads compared to 150 LGM-30 silos = 150tubes x3Mirvs = 450 warheads for a rough comparison (too lazy to do the full math equalizing cost and taking into account the cost of operations and the missiles themselves but the Minutemen will give more missiles per buck). Not saying SSBNs are inferior - their survivability makes them better as second strike weapons weeks or months after the initial exchange.
@Shinobubu
@Shinobubu Год назад
They can try to target them. Russia and China's accuracy is lets just say . LAUGHABLE. The safest place to be is where they're trying to aim.
@JJ-M
@JJ-M Год назад
​@@darkodonnie2729.... the hell are you doing calling China's hypersonics (of which they do not have enough to tip a conflict between them and NATO irregardless of my next point) a Dong Feng? Those aren't hypersonics. Those are traditional ICBM, IRBMs, and SRBMs, which pointedly will get detected pretty much the minute they launch in the modern world, we've proven that time and again with North Korea's repeat temper tantrums. Pretty much everyone across every major power group detects it the moment it sets off. It's... not that hard these days with all the systems the major powers have specifically around that.
@toolbaggers
@toolbaggers Год назад
Stop threatening to 'flip the game board' and destroy the entire planet if the cost of a Big Mac goes up a little bit.
@yoloswaggins2161
@yoloswaggins2161 Год назад
Can you imagine what cappy would do if the enemy used more advanced shapes than triangles, rectangles and circles.
@rayzerot
@rayzerot Год назад
We all know that the enemy uses pentagrams lol
@emwhaibee
@emwhaibee Год назад
I can see it after the "can't swim around a wet pape rbag" self roast. 👌🏾
@jntallweather7040
@jntallweather7040 Год назад
DO NOT let Cappy know about Rubix cubes! We may lose him.
@majfauxpas
@majfauxpas Год назад
Yet again the navy is replacing it’s brand new fleet with a smaller, more expensive fleet. It’s freaking genius right! The main reason is probably because the previous fleet was too expensive….
@jerelull9629
@jerelull9629 Год назад
??? What?
@danielclark6638
@danielclark6638 Год назад
Australia is getting nuclear powered attack subs not ballistic missile boomers
@LiveFreeOrDieDH
@LiveFreeOrDieDH Год назад
This comment needs higher visibility. It's a distinction that gets lost far too often in news coverage and online discussion.
@gasdive
@gasdive Год назад
To defend our shipping routes with our major trading partner (China) from attack by China. So useful.
@averagejoe112
@averagejoe112 Год назад
Aren't they getting VA class?
@LiveFreeOrDieDH
@LiveFreeOrDieDH Год назад
@@averagejoe112 Yes. The goal is to deliver 3-5 Virginia class subs while Australia learns domestic SSN production. Subs produced in Australia will be a design that the UK is currently working on, with the addition of some US technology.
@averagejoe112
@averagejoe112 Год назад
@@LiveFreeOrDieDH VA class are good boats.
@hifinsword
@hifinsword Год назад
Great video Chris. Upgrading our military assets with the modular concept is highlighted with B-21 bomber. The newest pilots in the B-21 bomber will eventually transition to the B-52 bomber in the future. 😀
@tbas8741
@tbas8741 11 месяцев назад
B-52 is planned to be in service until 2075 atleast (they are just upgrading the engines now to high bypass turbofans.)
@mill2712
@mill2712 11 месяцев назад
​@@tbas8741 I'm curious once those 50 years are up, what can replace the B-52? (Assuming they don't develop something superior to it sooner.)
@devildawgpryde4764
@devildawgpryde4764 Год назад
Welded on Submarines as a civilian and a leader in the Union. Boilermakers. I've crawled all over a LA class submarine. USS. Dallas, Oklahoma City, Memphis, Louisville and over a dozen more. Good briefing. Well done.
@ihavetowait90daystochangem67
The Submarine is so Good that they named a Country after it
@Stan_the_Belgian
@Stan_the_Belgian Год назад
😂😂😂
@KennyNGA
@KennyNGA Год назад
Fun fact: after Toto released his song south Pangea liked it so much they split and created a country named Africa
@williamgray8499
@williamgray8499 Год назад
It's Colombia, not Columbia. I bring this up, only to keep everyone safe. Sometimes Colombians get bent out of shape about that.
@Aeronaut1975
@Aeronaut1975 Год назад
Columbia and Colombia are 2 entirely different things. Colombians get tetchy when you when you say "Columbia".
@cedriceric9730
@cedriceric9730 Год назад
😂😂😂😂😂
@WSallai
@WSallai Год назад
I did nine Strategic Deterrent Patrols on one of the original “41 for Freedom” SSBNs, a Lafayette-class Boomer between 1977 and 1981. The Trident Missiles were just out on the USS Ohio and USS Michigan. If you were rocking & rollin’ in NY Harbor and we’re aiming for a Pitcher’s Mound in Moscow, a Warhead would fall somewhere in the infield. The Russians used warheads rated in the megatons range versus our kilotons, because their guidance systems weren’t as accurate. My Poseidon Missile Submarine had to be closer to hit that same Pitcher’s Mound. Our Submarines are the deadliest weapon systems known to Mankind and with much praying & steady nerves, you will end up shaving with them after they are scrapped. I quite proud to do my part in preventing the Soviets from dominating the World. My hope is that all of these Boats, like the USS James Monroe (SSBN-622), May they Rust in Peace!
@purpleslog
@purpleslog Год назад
I think you just talked more about subs then the retired sub senior chief I worked with for three years. When I would ask him stuff, he’d give me a look like he was deciding if should call the FBI about me. 🙂
@stevenphillips3466
@stevenphillips3466 Год назад
I was in the VP squadrons ( p - 3 Orion's ) looking for those Soviet subs back in the 80's ... just for fun I want on google earth to look at my old base and there are no more P-3 's ...haven't been sense 1994 I guess.... that hurt when your part has passed into history
@F4FWildcat
@F4FWildcat 11 месяцев назад
Me too, from '78 to '81. I was a maintainer. @@stevenphillips3466
@dirtydish6642
@dirtydish6642 Год назад
Few submariners would complain about a bigger sub, especially the fast-attack sailors.
@hellspawn8795
@hellspawn8795 Год назад
BuT ThEn wE woUldnT be FasT aTTaCK TOugH 🤢
@RayTheMickey
@RayTheMickey Год назад
A bigger boat just means more to clean. With increased automation, which was bad word on 688 boats, you could fight the boat with smaller crews and need less space.
@jacob11938
@jacob11938 Год назад
Lol working on them, it’s nuts to butts, and with temporary services you constantly hit your head
@AuxiliaryPanther
@AuxiliaryPanther Год назад
​@@jacob11938yeah, having been in both worlds, it's nice when the temp services are gone.
@hanstoli6289
@hanstoli6289 Год назад
My friend is a nuke tech in Groton. He drove me past the ship yard. Security is every where and no photos are allowed of the outside building.
@kordelas2514
@kordelas2514 Год назад
Nukes are a lie.
@GioMarron
@GioMarron Год назад
I honestly don’t think people get what a wonder of technology these boats are. I worked on Britain’s nuclear deterrent, back in the days of the Vanguard Class, and we worked really closely with our American allies. We’d have regular FOKRs and we’d also regularly have to repair the V-Boats when they came back from manoeuvres To any civvies, it is terrifying how often subs, that are nuclear powered and carrying nuclear missiles, come back to port damaged because they’d hit the bottom
@hifinsword
@hifinsword Год назад
The recent bottle neck at the only airbase for the B-2 bomber highlights the problem of basing all strategic bomber aircraft at one base with only 1 operational runway. An accident on the runway stopped all ops from the base, hemming in most of the airborne arm of our nuclear triad defense for an extended time.
@joshuahansen5486
@joshuahansen5486 Год назад
Maybe the Navy should just Build 132 1$ billion dollar submarines and stop complaining about not being able to outspend the Air Force
@rayzerot
@rayzerot Год назад
Those costs would add up reeeeeeeal fast. Not just the actual boats. Paying for 132 submarine crews? Enough mechanics to maintain and repair 132 subs? The food, the radioactive fuel, the paperwork? So much red tape. That would certainly add to the top of the national debt haha
@joshuahansen5486
@joshuahansen5486 Год назад
@@rayzerot having 132 single missile Subs with with maybe a dozen man crew wood probably be less easy to defeat then 12 300 man Subs
@M16_Akula-III
@M16_Akula-III Год назад
@@joshuahansen5486 It's literally impossible to only have a 12 person crew, the Alfa's were highly automated and they still had 40 something crew, and that's a small SSN. Even then at the time U.S SSN's still have over 100 sailors in them.
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
@@joshuahansen5486 A sub with a dozen men to crew it would be so useless that it wouldn't matter how many you had, they couldn't begin to match the capability of the Columbia class boats.
@M16_Akula-III
@M16_Akula-III Год назад
@@thekinginyellow1744 12 People will not suffice to use and mantain a sub. Especially one that NEEDS to have defences and one that could fire an SLBM. + What powerplant anyways
@apc9714
@apc9714 Год назад
The strenght pf the US navy is insane. If the worse happen, I would NOT want to be a chinese sailor, at all
@belliduradespicio8009
@belliduradespicio8009 Год назад
I wouldn't want to be any sailor in that battle, there's no telling which way it will go, that's the problem with war.
@TheBear710
@TheBear710 Год назад
bf4 scared the living shit out of time with the scene with the sailors being locked under and drowning.. fuck that i could never be a sailor but luckily we have alot of Brave people willing to do that job. Hats off to all the sailors..@@belliduradespicio8009
@cedriceric9730
@cedriceric9730 Год назад
​@@belliduradespicio8009the us navy is too far ahead , thats just plain truth
@HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle
The Chinese debatably is a near equivalent naval power. Don't underestimate someone else and overestimate the current Navy. The type 055 is China's best weapon, and the Ohio SSGN's are going to retire soon.
@YourStylesGeneric321
@YourStylesGeneric321 Год назад
@@HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle LOL the Coast Guard has a bigger Navy than China.
@JohnDoe-tx8lq
@JohnDoe-tx8lq Год назад
Good, clear, simple and informative graphic! 04:00 👍 Unfortunately, that's the Diameter... 😃
@RedKytten
@RedKytten Год назад
I am surprised you didn't comment on the extra 0, throwing it off by an order of magnitude.
@TooBiggoBritches
@TooBiggoBritches Год назад
***Unfortunately, that's an order of magnitude larger than the Diameter... 😃
@TooBiggoBritches
@TooBiggoBritches Год назад
Or maybe that's what he meant by "sirrrcummmfence"
@AT2Productions
@AT2Productions Год назад
The main reason for 12 being the minimum number is also affected by maintenance periods. Look at the aircraft carriers, they have a mid-life overhaul that takes them out of a deployable status for a couple years. Guess what we’re also projected to have 12 of, CVNs.
@jkutyna
@jkutyna Год назад
Essentially you only have 1 to 2 that are in active service at any time due to there being 12. 1 is always in refueling, the vast majority are in PIA or DPIAs and then following that, are in workups to get recertified for the next 6 month west pac or med cruise. It is about a 2.5 year cycle with only .5 of that cycle actually having your carrier be active duty and operational for need. In wartime situations, such as 9/11, they could call in some of the ships that were in workup status and we were able to put 4-5 carrier battle groups into the gulf to go after Iraq at the same time, but that has immense long term repercussions upon the ship, it's gear, and the crew morale. CVN-72 which I departed the military from promptly went on a 12+ month cruise 2 weeks after I departed the ship, thanks to 9/11. Imagine not seeing land for that much time, and that was back in the day when we didn't have interwebs on board, at least not for enlisted, so there was no real communication with the outside world or your family. I have no idea what kind of communications they might have these days when at sea.
@AT2Productions
@AT2Productions Год назад
@@jkutyna I was part of the last full crew on CV-63 out of Japan, then spent time SeaOpDet on CVN-74 before I got out. The operation tempo and delayed maintenance activities is killing ship readiness.
@matthewitt2276
@matthewitt2276 Год назад
Watching a fellow Infantryman describe the intricacies of a submarine brings a tear to my eye
@devildawgpryde4764
@devildawgpryde4764 Год назад
I'm an 0341. 81mm MORTARS UP. USMC, Invaded Kuwait back in the day. Also guarded nukes at NSB Kings Bay, Ga. Welded on Submarines as a civilian and a leader in the Union. Boilermakers. I've crawled all over a LA class Submarine. USS. Dallas, Oklahoma City, Memphis, Louisville and over a dozen more.
@JosephsCoat
@JosephsCoat Год назад
I’m a former infantryman and I spent four years working on the Columbia program 😉
@devildawgpryde4764
@devildawgpryde4764 Год назад
@@JosephsCoat OOO-RAH !!!!!
@garrettharriman6333
@garrettharriman6333 Год назад
I think the infantry will need lightsaber bayonets by 2050. Come on DARPA, make it happen.
@Blake_Bones_69
@Blake_Bones_69 Год назад
We need to understand that the flotilla that sailed near Alaska ONLY operated in international waters which we must allow a better way to put it is we pulled 4 destroyers and they alone created more fire power than the flotilla itself
@RicCross
@RicCross Год назад
@Blake_Bones_69 Thanks for the clear, concise explanation of the “real world” … IMHO think the Navy needs way more destroyers than what they currently have…
@jimnaz5267
@jimnaz5267 Год назад
you have advanced from your original vids to prime time new grade performance. congrats
@tobiasdevlamingh9820
@tobiasdevlamingh9820 Год назад
I always watch your videos, with much anticipation. What I most appreciate is your knowledge and research into military technologies, impressive to say the least. Don't know or really care how you do it, but you do it. Well done and keep up the good work!
@mr1234tempo
@mr1234tempo Год назад
When I was part of the nuclear submarine Navy... there were two types of submarines, the Fast Attack SSN and the Fleet Ballistic SSBN... The Fast Attack subs did not carry ICBMs and the Fleet Ballistic did... the Fleet Ballistic boat SSBN earned the nick name of "Boomers".😊
@patrickbukowski9667
@patrickbukowski9667 11 месяцев назад
I made 4 deterrent patrols on the USS Von Steuben back in the 70's. we were presented the scenario that if it hit the fan, carriers had about 7 minutes to live. their escorts, frigates, had about 17 seconds.
@funveeable
@funveeable 11 месяцев назад
If China can figure out how to build a satellite that can detect neutrinos, every submarine would light up like a star. Too bad if the US doesn't know how, China doesn't either.
@AlanTheBeast100
@AlanTheBeast100 Год назад
Another reason they could reduce the fleet over time was the constantly improving accuracy of delivery. So nuclear yields went down, number of warheads went up, number of warheads per missile went up.
@aliemreyasar5002
@aliemreyasar5002 Год назад
That is a lot of money
@MrTangent-8
@MrTangent-8 Год назад
Since you did the Columbia class is it possible for you to do Britains equivalent the Dreadnaught class (very nice for Ur first naval video)
@macharlem
@macharlem 11 месяцев назад
Thanks Argent Cappy 🎉for the earbuds . We teachers love this kinda support giving up an instant conflict with students
@thomasd9827
@thomasd9827 Год назад
My favorite shape of deterrence is the circle. If you go up against one - there's no point.
@ephemispriest8069
@ephemispriest8069 Год назад
A submarine with carrier level fire projection makes me feel ways about stuff.
@jamesocker5235
@jamesocker5235 Год назад
Proper term for submariner is Bubblehead while surface crews are skimmers and their ships are simply referred to as targets
@curtisosmun442
@curtisosmun442 Год назад
I have a photo of a cruiser taken through a U.S. submarine periscope!
@HomercidalOne
@HomercidalOne Год назад
and naval aviators are airdales
@jamesocker5235
@jamesocker5235 Год назад
@@HomercidalOne at least they get to be dogs, vs airy fairys for air farce
@Sleepy_Alligator
@Sleepy_Alligator 11 месяцев назад
Used to be "Surface Pukes" by the Bubbleheads.
@AdamosDad
@AdamosDad Год назад
Old Navy guy here the Ohio class Trident II D5 is capable of carrying 14 warheads but up to now has been bound by treaty to only 8 warheads.
@Michael-ij6kg
@Michael-ij6kg Год назад
Fun fact! Less MIRV = More Range
@duanehorton4680
@duanehorton4680 Год назад
@@Michael-ij6kg Fewer, not less.
@rayRay-pw6gz
@rayRay-pw6gz Год назад
Each warhead carries multiple launch vehicles .
@JO-xt3om
@JO-xt3om Год назад
Why are you talking about this?
@AdamosDad
@AdamosDad Год назад
@@JO-xt3om Why not? Cappy was mistaken in saying that the UGM-133A Trident II D5 only carried 4 warheads, is capable of carrying 14 warheads but up to now has been bound by treaty to only 8 warheads. with 24 missile tubes on the Ohio's that means they could carry 336 re-entry vehicles, now they have never done that, but they carry 24x8=192 warheads. That is why we are talking about it.
@ChangedCauseYT-HateFoxNames
Ok, that title is worded wrongly, 132 billion for 12 submarines. Not 132 billion per submarine.
@Viking102938
@Viking102938 Год назад
It says "submarines" not "submarine", implying more than one Yours is most explicitly honest, both are technically correct
@mariusvanc
@mariusvanc Год назад
​​​@@Viking102938not $132 billion IN/FOR submarines, $132 billion submarines. If I say "$1000 hotdogs", do you think "that's a lot of hotdogs", or "those are expensive hotdogs"?
@idrisali3947
@idrisali3947 Год назад
he changed the title so i think cappy would agree
@jamesh1641
@jamesh1641 Год назад
And if the channel is American it should read “our” not “their”.
@slawck9635
@slawck9635 10 месяцев назад
I served on SSN 700 back 20 years ago and even then it was 30 years old. Make no mistake US submarine fleet has been out secret weapon ever since the Nautilus was commissioned as the first nuclear sub ever. Being on a sub that was built in the 70's that was such a technical marvel even in the year 2000 was insane. People can only imagine where we can park these things without anyone knowing. They're incredible
@slawck9635
@slawck9635 10 месяцев назад
That was the Dallas btw. Fast attack subs were named after cities. Ohio class (boomers) named after states. Seems like they might be moving away from that though 🤔
@davidrobinson970
@davidrobinson970 6 месяцев назад
My late Uncle, on my Mothers side, was a RN Submariner in the Second World War. His last job was teaching submariners how to escape from a downed sub. ( He had escaped from 4 downed subs over his Service, so knew what he was teaching!) Of course thinks are constantly changing so lets hope these new subs continue to keep the peace.
@broeretop1
@broeretop1 Год назад
What's long, hard and full of seamen?
@InterstellarTaco
@InterstellarTaco Год назад
Every navy sailors boot sock.
@tonnywildweasel8138
@tonnywildweasel8138 Год назад
@@InterstellarTaco : LMFAO
@williamhardes8081
@williamhardes8081 Год назад
hi, Australia here. can you lend us a couple of Ohio class until we get ours in about 20 years? the dimple like effect on the hull also reduces drag like dimples on a golf ball.
@EazyD-E
@EazyD-E Год назад
Right! You all need them quicker than anyone. Besides Japan and South Korea you are a main target of China. I hope my(USA) government hurries up and delivers your subs. Hopefully we are training your navy guys already on the platform.
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
Why do you guys need submarines when you're a land-locked country - what are you going to do, put them in your Alpine lakes? Also how would you get them there, are you planning to sail them to Trieste and then transport them through Italy or Slovenia by road? 😜
@EazyD-E
@EazyD-E Год назад
@@trolleriffic Wrong country.
@williamhardes8081
@williamhardes8081 Год назад
OK, are you american? hate to tell you this but Australia (not Austria!) is not land locked. it is an F'ing big island! go buy a world map. @@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
@@williamhardes8081 Would an American confused about geography know that the nearest major port to Austria is Trieste? I thought I'd made it as obvious as I could that I was joking, but that's the problem with written communication!
@cfalletta7220
@cfalletta7220 Год назад
You should talk about the new unmanned subs they have those are actually a really big game changer
@LarryDickman1
@LarryDickman1 Год назад
They will be great in the game of deception.
@danielbarnes7559
@danielbarnes7559 11 месяцев назад
The new Virginia class submarine is the most likely choice to attack surface vessels, if they were to use the newest platforms, but the LA class subs and seawolf class are still potent and capable platforms
@madmandocrypto
@madmandocrypto Год назад
Fun Fact: Newer Virginia Class subs are in fact using X-Box controllers....yes a controller similar to the one used on that Titanic explorer. But it's not used for actual ship control (steering).
@TH-qh6jz
@TH-qh6jz Год назад
Thats alot of subs.
@joshneu1167
@joshneu1167 Год назад
Big point most people miss is that AT BEST only 6 will be forward deployed at any given time. The other half or more will be either training at sea or in a yard period.
@st3pp3nw0lf86
@st3pp3nw0lf86 Год назад
In peacetime.
@vanguard9067
@vanguard9067 Год назад
@taskandpurpose. I am not sure launching Camrys, even millions of them, at our enemies is quite the deterrent you think it is.
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose Год назад
imagine a massive fleet of millions of Camry's modified for amphibious operations , covering like the whole horizon. No one would dare fight back.
@iQKyyR3K
@iQKyyR3K Год назад
sure as hell not with that attitude.
@esobed1
@esobed1 Год назад
​@@Taskandpurpose don't camrys sorta float already? Besides, if rush hour traffic makes us shudder the sight of that many camrys should illicit immediate surrender.
@jonevansauthor
@jonevansauthor Год назад
@@Taskandpurpose oh, a fleet of them? I thought he meant launching them through the air because any mid sized automobile dropping on your home town would be absolutely terrifying. The French would surrender before you even pulled the trigger. Or finished the catapult for that matter.
@Daphne-z2u
@Daphne-z2u 11 месяцев назад
Autumn is a second spring when every leaf is a flower.
@dsloop3907
@dsloop3907 11 месяцев назад
Worked for a company back in the mid 90's that sold a very special machine to the USN. It had to do with rubber extrusion. A government rep was there to watch 100% of the manufacturing process, until the machine shipped out in an unmarked tractor trailer. It was special because of being made of aluminum, so it would be easier to move about.
@dragonslayer2107
@dragonslayer2107 Год назад
While the Columbia-class submarines are great as a deterrent, the US also needs a good fast-attack submarine to protect its waters from enemy submarines with similar capabilities.
@gregoryschmitz2131
@gregoryschmitz2131 Год назад
Its not the waters of the US a Fast Attack protects, its killing enemy vessels, be it sub or surface and in THEIR waters
@M16_Akula-III
@M16_Akula-III Год назад
You don't need fast submarines, you're not going to be using the top speed all the time. Only on specific cases. You want quiet and moderately fast.
@dragonslayer2107
@dragonslayer2107 Год назад
@@M16_Akula-III I was referring to the class of submarine. The Virginia Class is referred to as a fast-attack submarine which I think is how the US classifies their Hunter-Killer submarines.
@danielpaoli1093
@danielpaoli1093 Год назад
The Block III Virginia submarine is more than capable of seeking and destroying 99% of the world's submarine fleet. And besides if you think Russian and Chinese ports don't have a American submarine watching them, you better rethink your life
@jakeaurod
@jakeaurod Год назад
Depends on whether Russian missile subs ever leave their bastions. The US will probably have to send attack subs in to Russian waters to take out their boomers.
@themeatpopsicle
@themeatpopsicle Год назад
The Navy needs exactly the number of subs to cover the entirety of the planet's land area, which includes however many subs can be expected to be in dock at any point in time.
@crandall777
@crandall777 Год назад
Hey man, I ordered some Raycons the first time I watched this . This video is good, like all your videos, so I'm expecting the Ray cons to be good too. Because you endorsed them . I hope you endorsed them because they good . Not because you needed a sponsor 😮
@crandall777
@crandall777 11 месяцев назад
My racons begin crapping out after i use 10%. I have to reboot them in the charging box. They sound terrible after 20 minutes I have too many problems to name here, but I regret buying them. Has anyone else "enjoyed " Their Raycons ? I want my money back
@Thadude701
@Thadude701 Год назад
I served on the USS Alexander Hamilton ssbn617 an old boat by today's standard but an amazing piece of machinery .
@nekomakhea9440
@nekomakhea9440 Год назад
The "we only need 8 subs" argument fails to consider that the US might have most of them stuck in port waiting for maintenance (like the UK) or offline for a year because of the Navy ramming subs into undersea mountains.
@Russo-Delenda-Est
@Russo-Delenda-Est Год назад
Those mountains need to get da fuq out da way. Murica is coming thru!
@iamscoutstfu
@iamscoutstfu Год назад
Theyre only doing that because theres no immediate need for more of them at sea. If we go war, that number goes up.
@RayTheMickey
@RayTheMickey Год назад
@@Russo-Delenda-Est Yeah, that doesn't work. You would be surpised how many times that has happened.
@WeighedWilson
@WeighedWilson 10 месяцев назад
They are putting bigger bumpers on the new models.
@Shy_Knee_Side_Up
@Shy_Knee_Side_Up Год назад
Many argue modern Nuke Subs are THE most sophisticated weapon system we got. I agree with your assessment that Aircraft carriers are more complex.
@RayTheMickey
@RayTheMickey Год назад
I never understood why we spend so much on such a big target for our submarines...
@rayRay-pw6gz
@rayRay-pw6gz Год назад
They each have their place . The submarine operates deep underwater, which is called a hostile environment . That is truly the big difference.
@skip123davis
@skip123davis Год назад
i took a tour of ohio class vessel years ago, when vendors were invited aboard. it was in bangor, wa, or naval undersea warfare center, i forget. awesome! they showed us a ribbon across the hull in a part of the ship, and described how much it would sag when the boat was submerged. crazy! many of us got to sit in the chairs on the bridge, and look around
@actionjksn
@actionjksn Год назад
I got to sit in the captain's chair of the most advanced machine ever created. It has traveled further than anything else, out to where no man has gone before.
@Peter_Enis
@Peter_Enis Год назад
@@actionjksn You mean your toilet at home 😉
@actionjksn
@actionjksn Год назад
@@Peter_Enis No I don't mean that at all. I sat in the captain's chair from the USS Enterprise NC-1701. The same chair that Captain James Tiberius Kirk sat in for many deep space missions.
@speedyham545
@speedyham545 Год назад
The Ohio class Submarines were not supposed to be refueled either when they were initially designed and commissioned. I know as I helped figure out how to refuel them after they had already been in service for years and their replacements were not ready.
@tlgeorge59
@tlgeorge59 Год назад
At around 3:15 timestamp you say that The TRIDENT II missile on the Ohio class submarines can only carry 4 or 5 nuclear warheads. In fact, the original Trident II (D5) missile could carry up to 12 W76 - MK4 nuclear warheads or eight W88-MK 5 warheads. Changes to the front-end missile configuration have been made to streamline missile processing and reduce overall man-hours for configuration support and weapons maintainability over time. The D5 Life Extension missile currently can carry up to eight nuclear warheads regardless of type used by the program. The more warheads installed will equate to distance delivery reduction (max missile range) when reduced below the break-even threshold weight for lift capability. That break-even issue is tied to the need to burn out all three solid boost rockets before releasing the warhead delivery bus during suborbital flight and the maximum range is tied to power delivery capability of the missile internal power system needed to control the missile and release the warheads. Up to this point the Life Extension Triden II (D5) missile is the most capable and maintainable long range nuclear delivery system produced by the United States military program. But of course, the new Land Based Strategic Missile System under current development might change all of that.
@MostlyPennyCat
@MostlyPennyCat Год назад
So they're not $132 billion each then. _Yet_
@RonGunsolus
@RonGunsolus Год назад
not 'attack' subs, but strategic ballistic missile boats... just sayin...
@ares106
@ares106 Год назад
I just realized we have been quasi fighting thermonuclear war for the past few decades. Because it's such a short conflict all your assets must be deployed from the start and it could start at any moment such that all of humanity is maintaining a constant holding pattern characteristic of minutes before a war is waged. Similar to how the Japanese fleet was deployed minutes before the Pearl Harbor attack.
@nathanahubbard1975
@nathanahubbard1975 Год назад
Now think about how back in the 50s before we had the missiles, we kept B52s in the air all the time for the same reason.
@hyokkim7726
@hyokkim7726 Год назад
All the money wasted on Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Ukraine, instead of R&D.
@rayzerot
@rayzerot Год назад
​@@hyokkim7726Money wasted in Ukraine? Are you drunk? We just set Russia back well over a decade and didn't lose a single American to accomplish it. Russia is still respected as a nuclear power but NATO now has zero concerns about a conventional Russian invasion. Worth every penny to figure out that Russia was a paper tiger
@Knight_Kin
@Knight_Kin Год назад
@@rayzerot It's debatable how much long term damage that may have done to Russia. They have expanded their industrial capacity many times in most war goods, while also seeming to figure out workarounds with the chip export bans. They also increased their army from 1 to 1.5 million not including mobilized troops. So far the war has put big stress on Russia but not nearly as much as expected, so they've adapted. What you describe are debatable viewpoints because it's not exactly that clear how much Russia will suffer. It DID prevent them from expanding further in Ukraine but i don't know how much it hurts them as a whole (you see the difference?). This war has turned out very differently than the Soviet experience in Afghanistan.
@tfkia356
@tfkia356 Год назад
​​​​​​@@Knight_KinTanks (2290, of which destroyed: 1482, damaged: 129, abandoned: 132, captured: 549) Armoured Fighting Vehicles (964, of which destroyed: 634, damaged: 26, abandoned: 37, captured: 267) Infantry Fighting Vehicles (2741, of which destroyed: 1873, damaged: 110, abandoned: 145, captured: 612) Armoured Personnel Carriers (349, of which destroyed: 234, damaged: 9, abandoned: 15, captured: 91) Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Vehicles (47, of which destroyed: 33, damaged: 4, abandoned: 1, captured: 9) Infantry Mobility Vehicles (205, of which destroyed: 146, damaged: 6, abandoned: 2, captured: 51) Command Posts And Communications Stations (250, of which destroyed: 163, damaged: 2, abandoned: 2, captured: 83) Engineering Vehicles And Equipment (340, of which destroyed: 168, damaged: 9, abandoned: 38, captured: 125) Self-Propelled Anti-Tank Missile Systems (41, of which destroyed: 17, damaged: 1, abandoned: 4, captured: 19) Artillery Support Vehicles And Equipment (107, of which destroyed: 53, abandoned: 2, captured: 52) Towed Artillery (296, of which destroyed: 169, damaged: 26, abandoned: 5, captured: 96) Self-Propelled Artillery (512, of which destroyed: 368, damaged: 30, abandoned: 7, captured: 107) Multiple Rocket Launchers (262, of which destroyed: 192, damaged: 16, abandoned: 2, captured: 52) Anti-Aircraft Guns (17, of which destroyed: 3, captured: 14) Self-Propelled Anti-Aircraft Guns (25, of which destroyed: 14, damaged: 1, abandoned: 2, captured: 8) Surface-To-Air Missile Systems (151, of which destroyed: 102, damaged: 21, abandoned: 4, captured: 24) Radars (45, of which destroyed: 29, damaged: 4, captured: 9) Jammers And Deception Systems (54, of which destroyed: 41, damaged: 6, captured: 7) Aircraft (89, of which destroyed: 81, damaged: 8) Helicopters (105, of which destroyed: 91, damaged: 12, captured: 2) Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (14, of which destroyed: 11, captured: 3) Reconnaissance Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (284, of which destroyed: 161, captured: 123) Naval Ships (14, of which destroyed: 9, damaged: 5) Trucks, Vehicles, and Jeeps (2804, of which destroyed: 2128, damaged: 51, abandoned: 51, captured: 569) Infantry: ~120,000 killed, 170,000-180,000 wounded Lieutenant Generals: 2 Major Generals: 8 Colonels: 44 Lieutenant Colonels: 98 Majors: 193 Captains: 279 Senior Lieutenants: 471 Lieutenants: 235 Suspicious deaths of high-profile Russians: 46 Long-term emigration: ~817,000-922,000 (~80% college educated, ~100,000 IT workers) Ruble: Lost 25% of value despite extraordinary measures taken Money transfered abroad: $41.5 billion NATO: Expanded to the northern border and fully encircles the Baltic. Russia has exactly one (1) tank factory that produces around 20 T-90Ms a month. Ukraine destroys around 150 in that time. Roughly 3/4 of Russia's pre-war tanks have been destroyed. Russia built 27 combat aircraft in 2022 (4 Su-30SM2s, 10 Su-34Ms, 7 Su-35Ss, 6 Su-57s) Ukraine destroyed around 100 in that time. Nothing I put here is debatable. Russia is so unbelievably forked it's not even funny.
@randalparks9648
@randalparks9648 7 месяцев назад
Chris: New Carissa wasn't a tanker. She was a bulk cargo freighter (think grain and the like). She was running "in ballast" - empty -at the time she ran aground. The oil she leak was from her engine fuel tanks (and a hell of a bunch of it). A High School classmate of mine was in charge of the tow company that finally dragged her off the beach.
@Kelnx
@Kelnx Год назад
Former submariner...no the Navy would not use an SSBN (boomer) boat to deter adversaries. That's the job of Fast Attack boats (Los Angeles/Virginia/Seawolf class). SSBNs typically try to stay completely undetected and within an operating area as a part of the US strategic nuclear capability. They have weapons onboard in the event they need to defend themselves, but not for any hunter-killer operations and certainly not for battlegroup support. Also, the rest of the story of the USS Louisville (SSN724), after it had been the first to fire vertically launched tomahawk missiles in the Gulf War, then got their deployment extended 8 months to fire more missiles, they finally came home conquering heroes only to be met before reaching the pier by a small boat with an ORSE team on board, turned back out to sea and promptly did poorly on the ORSE causing the nukes to lose their post-deployment liberty. Because to the Navy, Naval Reactors comes before both God and Country.
@ProfessionalPFChangsExpert
@ProfessionalPFChangsExpert Год назад
Yay, new upload!
@2ndhendrix631
@2ndhendrix631 Год назад
Cappy you're the best! Thanks for the well researched info while making me laugh!
@TFY-v8l
@TFY-v8l Год назад
Hope they turn more Ohio class subs into cruise missiles subs.. we only have 4 such subs and they carry 154 Tomahawks.. each...
@gigakrait5648
@gigakrait5648 11 месяцев назад
Not gonna happen. They are already talking about retiring the current 4 SSGNs sometime within the next 4 to 5 years I believe. Their idea is that the Virginia's will replace the firepower of those subs. But that's a bit suspect. So far the current active Virginia's only carry 12 missiles each. Block V will carry 40 of which 10 are planned. So 22 Virginia's x 12 missiles each give you 264 vs. 616 total between the 4 SSGNs. And we're not building them fast enough to replace all those we're losing at once. It's going to be another 2 or 3 years before they get the first Block V's as well.
@robryan2079
@robryan2079 10 месяцев назад
Hard to detect… costs as much as an aircraft carrier… 224 total warheads That’s A LOT of FAFO
@larryt4884
@larryt4884 Год назад
My concern is that some spies might gain access to the information that could compromise the location of our subs and, given the smaller number of them, it would make it easier to destroy them.
@timtrewyn453
@timtrewyn453 Год назад
I tend to think that all the Pentagon and other interested land-based parties know about a SLBM sub's location is that of a fairly large region of the ocean. The submarine's captain and navigation officers should have independent discretion as to their precise location in the region. In an emergency they have buoys to signal their location to rescue services.
@richinoregon
@richinoregon Год назад
@@timtrewyn453 You are correct. The only ones who know where a 'boomer' is, other than 'somewhere in this region' are the captain and navigator of the sub.
@Jaycren86
@Jaycren86 Год назад
Walmart employee would be a good name for a sub. I can never find one of them?
@jamesgeorge9467
@jamesgeorge9467 Год назад
​@@Jaycren86nice joke
@GoonyMclinux
@GoonyMclinux Год назад
Nobody on a sub know where they are for this reason. 😂
@kdebaar
@kdebaar Год назад
I'd like to know more about the capabilities of the fleet of 26,400,000 used Toyota Camrys. Sounds like a fantasic invasion deterrent that would work well in northern parts of Australia. Seems like there are over 1 million units deployed there aready. Otherwise this is another very informative and entertaining video.
@RayTheMickey
@RayTheMickey Год назад
That was mistake. They are actually dropped from the B2 as part of the triangle. The fact they aren't EV's scare the crap out of snowflakes and they start coloring instead of fighting.
@lillyanneserrelio2187
@lillyanneserrelio2187 10 месяцев назад
Hah! 😛
@kellymoses8566
@kellymoses8566 5 месяцев назад
Not needing to be refilled for its entire life is simply amazing.
@michael1968-m9b
@michael1968-m9b Год назад
well it aint a secret, now its all over youtube
@TonyfromTO
@TonyfromTO Год назад
Rereading splinter cell book 2, mentions a fair bit of submarine related topics, it is nice to see that 15 year old franchise still managed to be relevant with military affairs we are still dealing with today.
@ThePeterR66
@ThePeterR66 Год назад
Great Video , very informative. Good to know an ally has the same capability as us (France) where with our 4 Nuclear submarines + M52 intercontinental nuclear missile (Speed Mach 15 - Distance 10000km) we have the capacity to nuke within 1 hour 640 regions (16 missiles x 10 nuclear head each x 4 submarines) whereever in the world. This is called dissuasion and avoid every country to attack France without having to face definitive consequences.
@glennmitchell9107
@glennmitchell9107 Год назад
Which nuclear power has ever seriously threatened France? What would be the point?
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
​@@glennmitchell9107 The fear was that if the USSR attacked France with nuclear weapons but refrained from using them against the rest of NATO, there was considerable doubt whether the US or UK would respond with their own nuclear weapons (and essentially commit suicide in the process) or sit back and keep the war conventional without responding in kind. An independent French (and UK) deterrent was someone America was very keen on because it increased the credibility of NATO nuclear forces by making it clear to the Soviet Union that it couldn't get away with a limited nuclear attack against either nation (or its forces elsewhere) without being hit by nukes in response.
@glennmitchell9107
@glennmitchell9107 Год назад
@@trolleriffic Although, that reasoning would also apply to every NATO nation. Why were France and the UK the only NATO members nominated for this role?
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
@@glennmitchell9107 Because we're the only ones who spent the time and effort to develop our own nuclear weapons. Britain had a nuclear bomb program from 1941 onwards which it merged into the Manhattan Project (and got screwed over for a while after the War ended when America ended knowledge sharing with its allies) and France has always been fiercely independent and willing to consistently spend money on defence. Some other NATO countries have US nuclear weapons available for use by their forces under the nuclear sharing program but the bombs themselves are always under the control of US personnel up to the point they're loaded onto aircraft.
@jontaedouglas7244
@jontaedouglas7244 Год назад
@@glennmitchell9107Spain was unstable and no one was giving Germany nukes. Britain would have been alone as they were for a time but they wanted France to have nukes probably more than France itself cause it guaranteed Britain not having to be Europe’s first defense
@michigandogman3060
@michigandogman3060 10 месяцев назад
The mk48 torpedo is a very capable weapon, if one is launched against you they are very difficult to escape. During our war games we always got the surface ship we were after and never were found.
@anthonyc5039
@anthonyc5039 11 месяцев назад
Imagine the Mongols with 26 million used Toyotas…they would conquer the universe.
@KangoV
@KangoV Год назад
How come the torpedoes on this sub have a shorter range than those used by the Royal Navy and were introduced in 1992? Also, the Mk 48 max speed is 55 knots, while the Spearfish is 80 knots. Spearfish also has a larger warhead. Although, it was designed to engage high-speed, deep diving Soviet subs (Alfa class).
@bloodybucket213
@bloodybucket213 Год назад
Different mission requirements most likely.
@rayzerot
@rayzerot Год назад
Maybe they needed to decrease the range and decrease the warhead to make room for new sensors and logic chips for more accuracy?
@spacejaime
@spacejaime Год назад
@KangoV - the warheads are almost the same - 647lbs vs. 660ibs. The range is superior on the MK-48, from what is on the internet. The Spearfish is way faster. Both very good torpedoes.
@M16_Akula-III
@M16_Akula-III Год назад
Mk-48 Mod 5 ADCAP was made for engaging subs like Alfa. Now replaced by Mod 7 CBASS. Also, only a tad bit smaller warhead, literally doesn't matter much as a single hit on any sub would be enough to sink it.
@spacejaime
@spacejaime Год назад
@@M16_Akula-III - correct and agree. Cheers.
@josephnoneofyourbeeswax8517
It might be mentioned that on rare occasions the Ohio class submarine has been detected which may be why Columbia is being built.
@spacejaime
@spacejaime Год назад
Who has detected them? Curious.
@M16_Akula-III
@M16_Akula-III Год назад
I mean.. That literally goes for any sub, at any point you might be detected. Well, it might be cruising to it's designated patrol point anyways so it would've been going some 10+ Knots.
@M16_Akula-III
@M16_Akula-III Год назад
@@spacejaime K-154 Tigr
@spacejaime
@spacejaime Год назад
@@M16_Akula-III - an Akula class detected an Ohio? The crew in the Ohio was having a party and making a lot of noise! 😂😂I do not doubt it though. Everyone's sonar systems are getting better all the time.
@Redfour5
@Redfour5 Год назад
I love looking at Janes and what it says about US ships. They had one on all the ships I was on as a Marine. I remember talking to a crew member on a boat about top speed of the sub and quoting Janes and what it said the boat could do. He wouldn't say anything but had a big laugh when I quoted Janes on the top speed of his boat. Or when the Russians and their trawlers tried to harass us in the Med and we on an LPH were at top speed with the ship shuddering and a destroyer passed us on the way to intercept a trawler trying to get in our way. That ship passed us like we were pedestrians standing on the corner and when it turned, it almost on its side... Janes certainly did NOT have an accurate top speed on that one either. We are mothballing submarines that are as good as the newest Chinese and Russians Subs. We will be providing "Virginia" Class subs to Australia in like a decade or so because of their concerns over China. We may be giving them some late model (Blocks) Los Angeles Class nuclear subs to train them for the Virginia's when they come. The late model Los Angeles Class being mothballed maybe given to Australia soon are as good as anything the Chinese can put in the water and we are getting rid of them. We ONLY built three "Sea Wolf" subs that are so advanced that they are still likely decades ahead of anything anyone else can make. They are like our ace in the hole still used still far ahead of anything else including our own subs that replaced them. Why did we only build three? Because nothing else in the world could touch them and we didn't need them. So, what did we do? We built the Virginia Class subs still far ahead of anything else in the world. Virginia class subs are like Sea Wolf "Lite" versions... They still far outclass anything the Chinese or Russians can build. Oh yes, the world fears our submarines. They regularly follow Chinese and Russian Subs around the world without them knowing we are there. Apparently, as our subs break off, they will let the "enemy" subs know they were there and surprise them...just a reminder of how bad they are compared to ours. I had another friend who was on LA Class subs tell me that one after he was out. He had also been in Russian ports past their defenses on secret missions where the Russians NEVER knew they were even there. This was back around 1989 when no one knew what the Russians were going to do as the Soviet Union collapsed... We have only gotten better and better since.
@kennedymcleod1479
@kennedymcleod1479 5 месяцев назад
Boomers only applies to SSBN (missile boats) sailors. The other nuclear boats are called "fast attacks". In the old days of diesel boats the crew were know as "sewer pipe sailors" due to the fact that there was so little fresh water onboard and sailors could not take showers often. We call surface ship sailors "Skimmers". Though you only see subs while leaving and returning to port these boats are everywhere and are operating on special missions on a moments notice. Never underestimate U.S. submarines. All of us who have served in the submarine force are proud of our service and of what we do.
@logicalparadox2897
@logicalparadox2897 Год назад
The difference between the old control scheme and the new joystick-driven system is that, rather than simple up-down-left-right adjustment to the rudders, now it requires an up-up-down-down-left-right-left-right-a-b adjustment in order to enable all power ups. Coincidentally, that's also the launch code.
@xXNightsWatchXx
@xXNightsWatchXx Год назад
I really think not enough thought was put into the Used camry arsenal we could use them to defuse conflicts just start air dropping camrys with a full tank and compromised breaks
@duanehorton4680
@duanehorton4680 Год назад
Brakes, not breaks.
@Cha-Khia
@Cha-Khia Год назад
It's nice to know more about what it is I am actually building, the foundry I work for makes pretty much all the parts for Electric Boat and Northrop, among a few other military contractors, and we're making a lot of the parts for these new subs as well as refurbishing older vessels.
@clickbaitab5741
@clickbaitab5741 11 месяцев назад
That’s awesome I was excited to see the building he showed at the beginning was the new building in groton that I worked on for a year. It’s part of Electric boats expansion project so they may be needing more parts from you soon !
@jefreagan
@jefreagan Год назад
So many video clips of analog instrumentation, Russian and US ships combined (Typhoon, Virginia, Los Angeles, Ohio), kinda snatch and grab. For the initiate, it’s a decent explanation and compilation of duties and strategies. It’s very rudimentary with some goofiness thrown in. I do love all the naval shots though, mostly the subs. I build the engine rooms (propulsion spaces) for VA class subs at NNews SB, so seeing these pics on RU-vid that I can’t take out of the yard (due to confidentiality) is really cool. “What did you do today honey?” asks my wife. “Great, technical, good stuff! I just can’t show or explain it to you,” I reply. “You sure you have a job?” she thinks. “Ooh, ooh, this is what I do!” pointing at this video. Overall pretty good. 👍
@NSA-admin
@NSA-admin 6 месяцев назад
Love that highly detailed artist rendering.
@gradydavis251
@gradydavis251 Год назад
Might get us through the 2040’s but 2080 is a long ways away. I worry that new forms of underwater detection & uncrewed submersibles might render these massive submarines significantly less viable by then.
@bryanst.martin7134
@bryanst.martin7134 Год назад
The problem with a really large sub is that it creates a "hole absent of noise". This too can be detected as the ocean is a noisy place.
@HomercidalOne
@HomercidalOne Год назад
That would have to a really really really large sub.
@Youtubeuser1aa
@Youtubeuser1aa 11 месяцев назад
You sure about that?
@ethanwmonster9075
@ethanwmonster9075 Год назад
Sending ships to alaska when your getting your ass handed to you on a silver platter by a second world country is just rich.
@rogerwilco5918
@rogerwilco5918 Год назад
Huh??
@carbonstar9091
@carbonstar9091 Год назад
What?
@ethanwmonster9075
@ethanwmonster9075 Год назад
Russia sent ships to alaska the same country that can't even produce a functioning aircraft carrier and got their flagship sunk by a missile just to clarify.
@ethanwmonster9075
@ethanwmonster9075 Год назад
They are literally piggy backing off the confusingly named peoples liberation army navy for empty saber rattling.
@EB-nz1qv
@EB-nz1qv 11 месяцев назад
3:50 Image is indicating diameter instead of circumference.
@someguy6924
@someguy6924 Год назад
3:50 "24,0901 miles" damn earth huge
@nonamesplease6288
@nonamesplease6288 Год назад
US submariners are generally known as 'bubbleheads'. 'Boomer' is a name specifically for the guys who crew the SSBN's.
@grahamstrouse1165
@grahamstrouse1165 Год назад
Boomer is what we call the nuclear subs, not the crews.
@tomaskren8686
@tomaskren8686 Год назад
@@grahamstrouse1165 False. I was stationed on 3 688's (LA class fast attack). Boomer is anybody stationed on SSBN's.
@lippertwe
@lippertwe Год назад
Just a small note - deterrence doesnt work in "accidental" situations. That is, if one side feels that they are under attack but the cause is a misunderstood accident (sensor errors, accidental detentions, subs gone missing, etc.) - they may launch. there were a few close calls during the cold war, and even after. One was that Yeltsin almost launched - when we were all getting along - because a Norwegian rocket launch was assessed as a SLBM launch. Related to this - if there is a misreading of a situation in Moscow today, how long will Putin wait before launching? This isn't even a question of rationality - it is entirely rational to think one is under nuclear attack if that is what the sensors say, or if there has been a nuclear detonation at a sensitive strategic nuclear site (like the Thule Air Base incident, where a series of events could have destroyed the early warning site and the B-52 backup in the air).
@Ben-s3x
@Ben-s3x 11 месяцев назад
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
@sym8246-f5c
@sym8246-f5c Год назад
The largest and most complex graft scheme ever assebled. The columbia class will deter ships that can make it across the Taiwan straights or out of the black sea.
Далее
What Happened to Russia's Doomsday Submarine?
19:30
Просмотров 1,2 млн
We finally APPROVED @ZachChoi
00:31
Просмотров 2,2 млн
Help Me Celebrate! 😍🙏
00:35
Просмотров 10 млн
Meet the XM30 Replacing M2 Bradley
22:52
Просмотров 1 млн
ATACM Long Range Missile is Unstoppable
20:35
Просмотров 707 тыс.
America’s New Doomsday Weapon is Unstoppable
19:03
Просмотров 963 тыс.
America's “Aircraft Carrier Shortage” Explained
15:01
America's New Tank is Legitimately Insane
23:48
Просмотров 1,6 млн
Ranking Every Submarine on Earth (that we know about)
14:41