Тёмный

Why can't we see the Apollo lunar landers on the Moon from Earth ? 

Curious Droid
Подписаться 1,1 млн
Просмотров 3 млн
50% 1

When you look up at a full moon, just remember that somewhere on the lunar face, the remains of Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17 along with 8 unmanned Russian Luna missions and 5 pre-Apollo unmanned American Surveyor missions are all still there….. silently looking back….. unless of course, you’re a NASA non-believer.
Patreon : / curiousdroid
Paypal.me : www.paypal.me/curiousdroid
You can now translate this and other curious droid videos, see my video about it here • Curious Droid RU-vid ...
so… why can’t we see these from the earth, why can’t we train our best telescopes on to the moon’s surface and see them there exactly where we left them the best part of 50 years ago.
Well, there a bit of a problem…. and that is that the moon is 384,000 kilometres or 238,000 miles away and the landers and all the other things left behind are just few meters across.
To give you an Idea how difficult a problems that it is….. it’s like looking for an object the size of a coin from 1000 miles away or the equivalent from New York to Florida…. so you going to need a pretty serious telescope.
One telescope that springs to mind is the Hubble space telescope, after all if it can see galaxy’s billons of light years away then it should be able to see the Apollo landers easily…. shouldn’t it ??
Well, as with many things to do with space it’s not that simple. Yes, the Hubble space telescope was indeed designed to look at very faint objects at astronomical distances but those objects are clusters of galaxy’s trillions of millions across, it was not designed the take high resolution images of small objects at fairly close ranges in astronomical terms like to the moon.
The problem is down to the resolution of the images that the telescope can produce and that is limited by the laws of physics. The resolution determines the size the smallest Picture Element is or pixel in the image. The higher the resolution more of the fine detail in an image can be seen.
In a telescope, the bigger the mirror, the more the magnification, so the closer the object will appear but at the very large magnifications the image is also affected by the wavelength of the light itself. The shorter the wavelength like ultraviolet light, the finer the detail that can be captured and the resolution increases but in visible light as we go from blue through green to red, the wavelength increases and the resolution is decreased.
The Hubble has a mirror which is 2.4 meters in diameter, that was the largest that could fit in to the Space Shuttle when it was placed in to orbit. This gives it a single pixel resolution in ultra violet light of about 43 meters across on the moon’s surface, anything smaller than 43 meters across will just be hidden in a single dot which cannot be resolved any further, in fact we need really 2 pixels or more to make out anything at all......
GTC footage ©2015 Gianluca Lombardi/GTC
Title: Adam Are You Free?
Author: P C III
Source: www.pipechoir.com
Nightingale sounds from Gerry Gutteridge flic.kr/ps/Mk2zU
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Опубликовано:

 

28 дек 2016

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 22 тыс.   
@markyancey4103
@markyancey4103 4 года назад
If the Earth was flat, cats would have pushed everything off the edge by now.
@sentientprogram660
@sentientprogram660 4 года назад
True
@yourtoygod4ever39
@yourtoygod4ever39 4 года назад
Not if the flat earth is lets say 100.000 miles long.
@michaelturner3606
@michaelturner3606 4 года назад
How many times y’all gonna use the corny statement
@DPImageCapturing
@DPImageCapturing 4 года назад
If the Flat-Earth morons believe the Earth is flat, why don't they find the edge & jump off?!
@ArKritz84
@ArKritz84 4 года назад
DPImage Capturing because the edge is not in their mom’s basement or the inside of their car, so the “research” stops right there.
@deanlindholm8663
@deanlindholm8663 3 года назад
After an extensive study I have found two common things among flat earthers. They were VERY slippery at birth, and their parents were very tall.
@BIGMOUTHLOUIS
@BIGMOUTHLOUIS 3 года назад
hahaha!
@aaroncourtney6591
@aaroncourtney6591 3 года назад
What
@ishanghosh6604
@ishanghosh6604 3 года назад
? What ? Could anyone explain
@deanlindholm8663
@deanlindholm8663 3 года назад
@@ishanghosh6604 They got dropped on their heads at birth
@ishanghosh6604
@ishanghosh6604 3 года назад
@@deanlindholm8663 ah ok
@jimturpin
@jimturpin 3 года назад
For years I have wondered that very question. And the answer was so perfect! Thank you sir for illuminating that one pixel in my brain that had been in the dark all that time.
@evolved64
@evolved64 3 года назад
Think about it. If the Earth was in fact flat, the properties on the edge would be the most expensive because of the stellar views.
@JFK-ir7yz
@JFK-ir7yz 3 года назад
What edge?
@tankacebo9128
@tankacebo9128 3 года назад
I see what you did there haha
@bishalshakya7366
@bishalshakya7366 3 года назад
According to flat earthers there is no space.
@JFK-ir7yz
@JFK-ir7yz 3 года назад
@@bishalshakya7366 you’ve been to space?
@bishalshakya7366
@bishalshakya7366 3 года назад
@@JFK-ir7yz oh are we playing "you don't see, you don't exist"
@Brimannn1
@Brimannn1 5 лет назад
A flatearther’s greatest fear is sphere itself
@Brimannn1
@Brimannn1 5 лет назад
Bear Knuckles Not a joke, just a fact.
@conflectiz
@conflectiz 5 лет назад
Stop stealing others’ comments.
@Brimannn1
@Brimannn1 5 лет назад
conflectiz I’ve been saying this for years, you twat!😂
@dalecarpenter8828
@dalecarpenter8828 5 лет назад
Pretty good ! How do the explain the curve of the earth ? Rhetorical!
@tryithere
@tryithere 5 лет назад
I thought it was diabetes.
@09huangr
@09huangr 4 года назад
Flatearthers: "We have members all around the globe."
@willhopkinshopkins3270
@willhopkinshopkins3270 4 года назад
LMAO 😂
@noth606
@noth606 4 года назад
Translated: we have fooled idiots all over the globe
@erikmattson8629
@erikmattson8629 4 года назад
Brilliant! lol
@johnnelson8142
@johnnelson8142 4 года назад
Jason Huang I was never a what people call a glober didn’t didn’t give a damn about round earth or flat until I started realising the lies of nasa and the indoctrination in schools from early childhood and the media even Hollywood then I started to critically think and truly examine what they call evidence, once you do it all falls into place. The scariest thing now is the technology we have now they can make anything look real but the truth is it’s all plastic and the last thing they want is critical thinkers. In truth they are saying shut up and believe what I’m saying shut up and just get into line.
@TheBjossi80
@TheBjossi80 4 года назад
Why are you guys calling flat earthers bad names? I am one and I never call a globe believer retard. Why this anger? You do realise most flat earthers did believe in the spinning ball theory before we opened our mind to reality. It's not a cult or psychological state of mind. It's just fact
@2sdd
@2sdd 4 года назад
I had no idea Uncle Fester knows so much about space
@strangebiped
@strangebiped 3 года назад
That's FUNNY! Uncle Fester had a great smile & punch lines! I miss him! "THE ADAMS FAMILY" was great for the 60's..wait was it "THE MUNSTERS"??? I'm getting too old to remember anymore...
@ElenaGeorge1
@ElenaGeorge1 3 года назад
Well done! Not to mention that the Soviets would have called us out had the telemetry been from anywhere else other than on the moon.
@lightyagami3492
@lightyagami3492 2 года назад
If you had a powerful enough receiver at the time you could even tune into the moon landings live yourself to prove its real.
@zackattack635
@zackattack635 2 года назад
Russia absolutely didn’t believe we went to the moon. Most Russians still don’t believe it. At this point, with all of the information that is available, you have to be willfully stupid to believe it. Look at the “craft” they used. Look at the fact we can’t do what they did then… today with modern tech. If you think we landed on the moon still, you’re willfully naive.
@ElenaGeorge1
@ElenaGeorge1 2 года назад
@@zackattack635 Wherever you get your news, you need to find a better source.
@zackattack635
@zackattack635 2 года назад
@@ElenaGeorge1 as opposed to you, someone who thinks we went to the moon in 1969 and played golf… but can’t come close now. 50 years of insane technical progress, just can’t match the comically dumb “craft” they used to do the impossible? Stop being so gullible sweetie.
@AdelaeR
@AdelaeR 2 года назад
@@zackattack635 You suffer from Dunning-Kruger. A doctor will not help you but finding more information and actually studying the subject instead of watching stupid videos about it might.
@micahlynn7326
@micahlynn7326 5 лет назад
I find it kind of touching seeing the tracks of the astronauts on the moon, left 50 years ago. Imagine going back to a beach you visited as a child and see your footprints in the sand still there.. we may be long gone but we left a mark on the universe. Touching
@ann_onn
@ann_onn 5 лет назад
*@Conor M* There is a tiny, crude picture of a penis on the Moon, drawn by artist Andy Warhol. Apollo 12 took up a miniature "art museum" on a wafer. Famous artists were asked to contribute. Warhol drew a tiny cock-and-balls.
@bartonez123
@bartonez123 5 лет назад
And then one day when we finally have space tourism to the moon, some fat guy wearing a Hawaiian shirt eating an icecream is going to trip over and ruin all the footprints for everyone.
@LucidDreamer47
@LucidDreamer47 5 лет назад
@@bartonez123 Dennis Nedry?
@MunthassemKhan
@MunthassemKhan 5 лет назад
@micah lynn Love the way no one got your point. Sure hope you did. i.e. sand, dust, collisions, 50 years and still footprints. Preserved. Perfectly. Just like your childhood beach would be... of course. ;)
@BM8C7
@BM8C7 5 лет назад
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dTQoNcHTUSw.html
@S1KRYD
@S1KRYD 5 лет назад
I love the sarcasms at the end. Spot on!
@alessandrobiassi3162
@alessandrobiassi3162 5 лет назад
STIGZ .... you must be an ignorism lover and follower then....
@boblowes
@boblowes 5 лет назад
Flat Earth people are crazy.
@craigcarlson3978
@craigcarlson3978 5 лет назад
piss off NASA just pissss offfff
@craigcarlson3978
@craigcarlson3978 5 лет назад
bullshit..... with all the billions NASholes have burned through and continue to waste faster than the fed can print one would think you'd want to prove yourselves. The simple truth is its all one quintessential bunch of crap. I spent my youth idolizing nasa and the like I bought into all of the lies we were sold. I hope and pray that the truth with come out one of these days...when I think of all the ways that money could have been better spent and invested I get myself so worked up I get miserable and out of sorts. ain't that a bitch
@stranger_danger1900
@stranger_danger1900 5 лет назад
craig carlson Get a job and it will ease your mind. NASA has made many advances in medicine and technology over the years. ..When you grow up you will see.
@starraidz791
@starraidz791 4 года назад
I’ve been watching your videos for a while now but wasn’t subscribed. I wasn’t sure if all your content was the same quality but after watching several of them popping up in my feed I have determined every video I have seen so far is of great quality. Keep up the great work you earned a new subscriber!
@tonyhyde2644
@tonyhyde2644 4 года назад
i like the way you present things and the info you include as its detailed enough to clearly understand and straight to the point...well done!
@jimhaut480
@jimhaut480 8 месяцев назад
Bullshit
@JohnRedshaw
@JohnRedshaw 4 года назад
I was a flat-Earther for five years, until I turned five.
@harikishore2514
@harikishore2514 4 года назад
Probably your father is flat earther.
@jamesallen5591
@jamesallen5591 4 года назад
LOL
@JohnRedshaw
@JohnRedshaw 4 года назад
@@harikishore2514 he is under the earth
@Tin.Man.Trading
@Tin.Man.Trading 4 года назад
Then you have been programmed for 5 years by education. And now you're scared to face the truth.
@jamesallen5591
@jamesallen5591 4 года назад
@@Tin.Man.Trading Why do all of you use the same language/words. You are a cult.
@DAIadvisor
@DAIadvisor 7 лет назад
The real reason we can't see the landers is because over time, they sank into the cheese the moon is made out of. Yep.
@DAIadvisor
@DAIadvisor 7 лет назад
simul8guy - what do YOU think?
@thetagmarket1058
@thetagmarket1058 7 лет назад
True... the moon is indeed made of cheese.
@garyenwards1608
@garyenwards1608 7 лет назад
you need too watch operation avalanche you just have to watch it you must see this movie it will make u shit your panties
@hakont.4960
@hakont.4960 7 лет назад
Hm, I suddenly feel like having a grilled cheese sandwich :P.
@ike25young
@ike25young 7 лет назад
God Evelyn, you and your cheesy jokes.
@exexpat11
@exexpat11 3 года назад
Before the lunar mapping mission there was another way people checked on the locations of the landings. Some missions had mirrors designed to bounce lasers back to Earth.
@jay404
@jay404 Год назад
Yes but the reflectors never worked.
@Sam_Sam2
@Sam_Sam2 Год назад
@@jay404 they did we realized that the moon moves back from earth by just 3.8 cm
@Chindit1961
@Chindit1961 Год назад
@@Sam_Sam2 3.8cm per year, yes.
@sosababy1016
@sosababy1016 Год назад
@@jay404 yes they did, and still do.
@LexvanDijk
@LexvanDijk Год назад
@@sosababy1016 moon laser experiment is only claimed successful for the first time since aug 2020.
@m_d1905
@m_d1905 4 года назад
"But my iPhone takes great pictures, why won't it show me those landers?" Facepalm....people who don't understand how telescopes work but want to say we didn't go to to the moon because science. Oy!
@isegrim1978
@isegrim1978 4 года назад
And it comes mostly from people wo have not the faintest idea how photography works in the fist place. All that because the technicians that programmed the "Automode" actually know what they are doing...
@MrBarrynicholas
@MrBarrynicholas 4 года назад
Sprite Bonn Would you be kind enough to give the links, thanks.
@isegrim1978
@isegrim1978 4 года назад
@Mocco Mongananzo you underestimate the conspiracy nuts.
@iminyourbasement2426
@iminyourbasement2426 3 года назад
It’s lag
@ronaldstarkey4336
@ronaldstarkey4336 3 года назад
@Sprite Bonn what about the slug tracks and the railroad tracks and the thumb tracks... lol
@mikloslegrady965
@mikloslegrady965 5 лет назад
The Lunar landing was supposed to be shot in a Hollywood basement, but they hired Stanley Kubrik as director; and he's such a stickler for accuracy he insisted they shoot it on location. That is why the U.S. went to the moon.
@ericedwards1731
@ericedwards1731 5 лет назад
@felix mendez It's not a joke it's song lyrics dumb ass. The Red hot chilies are musicians not comedians.
@_Hadda
@_Hadda 5 лет назад
@felix mendez The only idiot scratching his nails on a blackboard is you.
@basedbear1605
@basedbear1605 5 лет назад
@@johnsmith-eo3nz Typical Alinsky Fascist... attack and demean anyone with an opinion different than your own. His joke was funny, you just attacked out of malice. Grow up, Junior.
@michawojciak1837
@michawojciak1837 5 лет назад
Yeah, and they have made great comedy with that fictional scenario. And it was shot in Britain, by the way, in the basement which has huge vagina instead of doorway.
@elli003
@elli003 5 лет назад
Pretty good Miklos !
@unclejerry486
@unclejerry486 7 лет назад
Nice to see the face behind the videos, cool stuff, thanks for spreading the knowledge!
@unclejerry486
@unclejerry486 7 лет назад
mmm?
@kevinadamson6830
@kevinadamson6830 2 года назад
Your channel is amazing Love the way you present the facts / information. I'm a fan
@mrickard
@mrickard 3 года назад
Your documentaries are so good, I'm happy to watch the long format any day.
@MayhemCanuck
@MayhemCanuck 4 года назад
Well done on explaining the Pixel resolution, much easier to understand why we can just see them :)
@RockBrentwood
@RockBrentwood 4 года назад
It's also wrong. Sub-pixel resolution is standard fare in digital signal processing for images. This is the correct take on the issue. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-pixel_resolution
@anonymousshawn9996
@anonymousshawn9996 4 года назад
And once again, NASA math doesn't add up. According to the specs of the Hubble Telescopes camera, it SHOULD be able to pick up an very thorough image of the landing site instead of a scratchy render, as shown/explained in this video. All the info that dude said in this video is absolutely wrong. And, sadly, not many people will question any of it; because not many know about even the most basic principles of how cameras work. :(
@williammcmullen1292
@williammcmullen1292 4 года назад
Or....it was a complete hoax
@williammcmullen1292
@williammcmullen1292 4 года назад
Bla bla bla we fooled u and the lunar lander is in a storage shed in Hollywood...we took the money and ran ...thanks stupid mericans
@ythinder
@ythinder 4 года назад
@@anonymousshawn9996 Yeah mathematicians and scientists at NASA are completely wrong, so we are to believe a random person commenting on RU-vid......that's how conspiracy theories start
@cosmoshfa88savant66
@cosmoshfa88savant66 5 лет назад
its a bit like trying to find a Boeing Jet in the Indian Ocean,,,,
@drexxler138
@drexxler138 5 лет назад
Lol hahhaha haha.
@vornamenachname906
@vornamenachname906 5 лет назад
daaaark :D
@RonWylie-gk5lc
@RonWylie-gk5lc 5 лет назад
ha ha
@craigcase5766
@craigcase5766 5 лет назад
Lol. I know, right?
@Lossyz
@Lossyz 5 лет назад
Only the moon doesn't have an ocean :-/
@srinitaaigaura
@srinitaaigaura 2 года назад
There is a wiki article on the Event Horizon telescope showing in pictures what was the level of magnification it had to achieve to photograph M87's black hole. It is equivalent to seeing a tennis ball on the moon. Sufficient to say you need at least a continent size telescope to see something that small clearly on the moon's surface.
@ThomasKundera
@ThomasKundera Год назад
In microwaves wavelength, right. But in optic, a smaller telescope would do (a 100m wide should see Apollo remains, a 1km wide one should see a tennis ball - but for atmospheric effects and such). Still way more that what we have now.
@amentco8445
@amentco8445 Год назад
@@ThomasKundera I thought clustering telescopes would make up for that? Several evenly spaced ones?
@ThomasKundera
@ThomasKundera Год назад
@@amentco8445 You can cluster radio-telescopes as the wavelength is large enough to allow sampling of the wave itself (several data points per wave) it's absolutely impossible with current tech in optics and as resolution decrease with wavelength enlargement I guess it's way better to just go near
@rexpimplemyer3839
@rexpimplemyer3839 4 года назад
And thank you, Paul for your informative and entertaining videos. Good fortune, sir.
@feuquegougueul1592
@feuquegougueul1592 7 лет назад
THX for all! It reminds me I was 20 and working in an hotel for the holydays (I was studen), and the night Apollo XI had landed (yes, it was early in the morning, in France), the whole crew wake up to see this historic exploit on a shitty small screen TV. Now, Im old and retired, but when i see all the conspiracy theorys, I'm between laughing or weeping. THX again !
@The-KP
@The-KP 5 лет назад
@Curious Droid, thanks for answering a long-held question of mine. I suppose it was something one could compute the answer to themselves, with geometry and trig, but it was nice to hear the qualitative version of it as well. Love your videos, tops.
@Guitarman7133
@Guitarman7133 5 лет назад
YOU IDIOT.
@youngtusk
@youngtusk 3 года назад
Amazing explanation. As always, see you on your next video. Keep up the good work! Big fan of your channel.
@MrCatfarmer
@MrCatfarmer 4 года назад
You could put a flat-earther in a rocket, take him to the moon and show him first hand and he would claim we went there and staged it.
@KvetaURL
@KvetaURL 4 года назад
“There’s a hologram on my spacesuit’s visor”
@_charliezard_7218
@_charliezard_7218 4 года назад
Ohrenaugenkatze _ yea , in the vacuum of space though
@radioactive9861
@radioactive9861 4 года назад
@@_charliezard_7218 That was the joke.......
4 года назад
Flat earthers - take them all to the space station and ask them to describe the earth...from the outside. Those that disbelieve gravity - take them all to a cliff and ask them what they're experiencing as you throw them off.
@kneegrow8486
@kneegrow8486 4 года назад
No he wouldn't, he would say why did u take this rocket 2 the desert, & what is Stanley Kubrick doing here?
@JonMcG
@JonMcG 7 лет назад
Fantastic , best Vid I've watched thats answered a question I have pondered for a few years . Thanks C-Droid .
@swinde
@swinde 7 лет назад
The deniers are so thick that we could take them to the Moon and they would STILL claim it is all fake.
@rutabagasteu
@rutabagasteu 7 лет назад
Swinde dump the deniers on the moon without space suits see if they think it's in a studio after that.. well for a few seconds anyway.
@HosamSherif
@HosamSherif 7 лет назад
They like to feel special. Like a little club of idiots.
@nelsonvisconti222
@nelsonvisconti222 7 лет назад
Swinde ....sucker think for youself
@nelsonvisconti222
@nelsonvisconti222 7 лет назад
Nexus Texas .....fuck you
@HosamSherif
@HosamSherif 7 лет назад
Skipping Stone Ok, I see your brain isn't that sophisticated!. Run along now child. Adults are discussing adult things!
@elvindelacrur2160
@elvindelacrur2160 3 года назад
Thanks you for posting this AMAZING video. Very informative. Thanks you again.
@cnjsharp2
@cnjsharp2 3 года назад
Very good descriptions. Easy logic to follow comparing distances and “focal length “, if you will. Thx
@madmatmp
@madmatmp 7 лет назад
Must of been weird parking the Lunar Buggy, knowing that it will be their virtually for ever. In the future, there will be glass around it, and tourists to the moon will visit it, like attractions on earth. 🤒
@dmsdmullins
@dmsdmullins 7 лет назад
But it won't be there even virtually for ever. It 'could' be hit by a meteor at any time, after a billion years those odds get better than nill. 3-6 billion years from now the Moon will be enveloped by the Sun, along with Earth and all our terrestrial and lunar creations will be reduced to atomic plasma.
@rhondaweber5638
@rhondaweber5638 7 лет назад
+Sinister Veridicus You mean nuke ourselves to the moon.
@nickbreen287
@nickbreen287 7 лет назад
As far as the human race is concerned, forever. We will not be here even in 1 billion years let alone 3-6.
@rhondaweber5638
@rhondaweber5638 7 лет назад
Nick Breen The end may come sooner than that with all the greed, hate and killing going on.
@nickbreen287
@nickbreen287 7 лет назад
Who were the globalists from 622 - 750 AD? Islam has its own agenda, fully independent from outside influence, a singular goal to make the planet islamic by any means necessary.
@estefez
@estefez 5 лет назад
Here's a good way to show just how hard the lunar landers would be to see from earth: Think of that iconic Apollo image of the earth rising over the moon. Now imagine how much you would need to zoom in to see a CAR on that image!
@inkyguy
@inkyguy 5 лет назад
Edmund Earle, another way is to also consider what would be necessary to spot your backyard garden shed or camper/caravan from the Moon, or for some of the doubters, their quarter acre marijuana crop.
@conflectiz
@conflectiz 5 лет назад
Wow. Thank you for making me laugh. I was having an off morning till i read this funny comment.
@37rainman
@37rainman 5 лет назад
+Woty: A 1/2 inch newspaper letter read from100 miles away, is proportional to "reading" an object on the moon 100 feet in size. The moonlander was what, about 10 to 15 feet in size? There is currently no scope on earth or around earth that has the resolution to photograph moon landing artifacts. (Whether or not there is actually any artifacts there). Begin your research by looking up the resolution of some major earth scopes. Or perhaps it would be more easy and entertaining to watch another silly utube conspiracy vid.....
@douglasditore8528
@douglasditore8528 5 лет назад
Great videos
@ellabradorus4390
@ellabradorus4390 5 лет назад
Operation Northwoods... Operation Mockingbird... The Gulf of Tonkin attack... If the CIA planned on assassinating thousands of its own people: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods then the step to faking moon landings was quite small. All the landings happened under the most fraudulent administration in history (Nixon administration) in a 3 year period (69-72) and stopped when Watergate broke. Since then, not a human beyond orbit in any of the world’s space programs. To not consider the circumstances surrounding a claim is no different than blind religious idiocy. I’m not a conspiracy guy in any way but lived in the 1960s. I wouldn’t trust a word out of a 1960s US government mouth if it had been peer reviewed and tested to an infallible shine. For many of us in the 1960s, Nixon’s first moon landing 6 months after he was sworn into office at the height of Vietnam (Tet offensive) was like if Trump’s _Space_ _Force_ put men on Mars only 6 months after being sworn into office in the middle of a Russian collusion investigation while in the middle of a major war with say N. Korea. This isn’t a claim of a flat earth. This isn’t a claim of big foot. This isn’t a claim of aliens in Roswell. This is the refutation of a claim by an unscrupulous government. *Occam’s* *Razor:* _The_ _simplest_ _solution_ _tends_ _to_ _be_ _the_ _correct_ _one._ _When_ _presented_ _with_ _competing_ _hypotheses_ _to_ _solve_ _a_ _problem,_ _one_ _should_ _select_ _the_ _one_ _with_ _the_ _fewest_ _assumptions._ So with that in mind, why is it that in almost 50 years no human has been beyond orbit in any space program in the world regardless of _Moore’s_ _Law,_ globalization and extraordinary technological advancements? Because we never went to begin with. Why can’t we see the moon landers? There never were any. Why so many questions about the moon landings with absurdly complex answers? Because we never went.
@Algorythmfpv
@Algorythmfpv 2 года назад
Not only was this captivating, well spoken, but interesting and very informative. I have to say it's not only satirical but kind of a safety net to finish all the statements with "unless of course you're a non-believer". Smart and funny.
@motorv8N
@motorv8N 4 года назад
Fabulous explanation accompanied by terrific graphics - thanks Paul!
@macc240038
@macc240038 6 лет назад
We older earthlings watched all of the Gemini, surveyor, Apollo missions along with many others not mentioned. Do you think for one minute the governments of Russia, China, the u k, France etc. And their populations weren't sitting in front of their t.v.s watching too ? Their scientists were tracking the Apollo spacecrafts. The Russians would have loved to call the Americans liars in that they did not land on the moon. They were our chief competitors. Funny thing, they didn't. They congratulated us for a job well done. But yet we have present day Americans who are busying themselves with this nonsense that there weren't any moon landings. So in ten , fifteen years, some country will land on Mars. And they will see it. And when they get old they will read on you tube how young people, who did not witness the first Mars landing, are calling it a hoax. And the joke will be on them. Brave men risked their lives to take us to the moon and advance space exploration and these deniers sit on their comfortable couch and give no credit to them. Ship of Fools.
@ann_onn
@ann_onn 6 лет назад
Well said. I wasn't _quite_ old enough, although I apparently 'watched' Armstrong land, at the age of about 2 weeks. I'm hoping we'll witness it again, perhaps within 10 years. You might enjoy playing with this interactive site about Apollo 11 from the audio perspective; I did. www.firstmenonthemoon.com/
@macc240038
@macc240038 6 лет назад
ann onn -- added the site, thank you
@arrowchaser1
@arrowchaser1 5 лет назад
macc240038 I saw it on TV when I was 8 yrs old! But just because it was on TV does not confirm it was real, especially when the broadcast was provided by the agency claiming to have gone to the moon..... mankind did not go to the moon....NASA lies... research it!
@macc240038
@macc240038 5 лет назад
Denis Boissonneault - your reducing all that I said simply seeing it on TV. That's just one line. A small percentage of what I said. Do you realize that the lunar orbiters are photographing the lunar landing sites right now ? The Chinese will soon duplicate the feat that Americans accomplished years ago ? Many be you'll live long enough to see astronaut walk on the moon again. And they will walk right up to the lunar Rover and send live video back. What will you conjure up then ?
@aaaaaaaa-cv4hy
@aaaaaaaa-cv4hy 5 лет назад
cheezl 2 We have plenty of proof, the problem is that you don't believe it. You should be the one providing it.
@IrandomhoboI
@IrandomhoboI 7 лет назад
Short answer is.... yes we can see it and bounce fucking lasers off of it
@arachnenet2244
@arachnenet2244 7 лет назад
Apollo retro-reflectors! :p
@dphorgan
@dphorgan 6 лет назад
oliver dutton No those are the retro reflectors
@dphorgan
@dphorgan 6 лет назад
They did it on the Mythbusters show disproving moon landing hoaxes.
@anonb4632
@anonb4632 6 лет назад
They bounce "fucking" lasers off the "fucking" mirrors that they "fucking" left behind, not the "fucking" modules them "fucking" selves.
@5ivestring
@5ivestring 3 года назад
Great video. I always wondered about this. Very well explained.
@snufkin84
@snufkin84 3 года назад
You do such a good job of explaining things, without all the hyperbole, repetition and rehash of other peoples footage / twitter feeds to inform people
@SailingWithVampires
@SailingWithVampires 5 лет назад
Great steady description. Nice to watch something interesting and well spoken at a good speed. Cheers. Sailing With Vampires
@TirarADeguello
@TirarADeguello 5 лет назад
You really did a good job on this and I think you explained it in layman's terms perfectly. Thank you.
@andrewe165
@andrewe165 5 лет назад
TirarADeguello I didn’t know you watch him!
@wullymc1
@wullymc1 5 лет назад
I wish he would explain how we can identify humans from space using satellites.
@TirarADeguello
@TirarADeguello 5 лет назад
@@andrewe165 I'm a big fan of science channels, and Curious Droid busts his ass making great content. I've been with him from near the start.
@michawojciak1837
@michawojciak1837 5 лет назад
As always:)
@acmagadia
@acmagadia 5 лет назад
TirarADeguello So the sun revolve under the flat earth and how come at the united state night time and Japan morning time I don't get it FLAT EARTH
@thefurrybastard1964
@thefurrybastard1964 3 года назад
No matter what you do they will not believe you. Hell, you could take them to the moon and show them the proof up close and they'd still find a way to call it all fake.
@x-creator4460
@x-creator4460 3 года назад
The irony is that they will say exactly the same thing to you.. Even if NASA admits the truth you will never believe it. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IDBBUwdyz4I.html
@thefurrybastard1964
@thefurrybastard1964 3 года назад
@@x-creator4460 Apollo did *not* go through the equatorial region of the belts, it flew over most of the Van Allen Belts, passing briefly through the weakest parts. You are just proving my point about conspiracy followers refusing to change their minds even in the face of insurmountable evidence.
@TrenchSniper21
@TrenchSniper21 3 года назад
Another great video, thank you Paul!
@STho205
@STho205 6 лет назад
Well stated. Many people looking in a scope or their digital zoom camera at the Moon think they're seeing rocks and small bolders. They're actually seeing big mountains and craters the size of huge lakes. These things look small because there are no real known references. When we look at Earth from a probe camera and see, say Florida, we know how big Florida is and that the Okefenokee is a really big lake. Therefore we don't expect to see Uncle Billy's RV outside Miami. Also moon mountains can look really "rocky" because there is nothing to erode them down to smooth cones like on Earth. However, I do think NASA/JPL does us a disservice by employing former Disney Imagineers to render the Hubble space art they often show in place of visual spectrum photography. People see what looks like something from Toy Story or Titanic, and they assume all is movie fake. In the old days, a text book would have a hand drawing or painting of say The Solar System or the Milky Way taken from an outside the galaxy perspective. We all knew that was a best guess imaginative picture based on other science. However with the flood of CGI astral images, even with backyard telescopes, kids get super skeptical. Best bet kids. Buy an analog reflective telescope (no camera or video gadgetry. Just lenses, mirrors and knobs) for about $200, go out of the city and look at some planets. Things will start to make sense.
@joeshmoe7967
@joeshmoe7967 5 лет назад
Except that the backyard astronomer images are NOT CGI. Composites yes, multiple images stacked in a software program to get better exposure value and detail but absolutely not CGI. I am currently working on my own shot of the Andromeda galaxies only using a DSLR and 300mm f4 lens. I got exciting results with only a stack equalling about 2 minutes of exposure. If we ever get a clear night here again (6 weeks of no good conditions) I am hoping for 30 minutes or more. Everyone repeat: Composite is NOT CGI. Your own eyes create composite images from very tiny sensors!!!!!!!!!!
@doorguru168888
@doorguru168888 5 лет назад
I think you meant Okeechobee Lake in Florida ! The Okefenokee Swamp is a shallow, 438,000-acre, peat-filled wetland straddling the Georgia-Florida line.
@Bogolyubovos
@Bogolyubovos 5 лет назад
S Tho I look up to see all those satellites whizzing around!!! They say 10,000 pieces of space junk.. Gee, I never see them crossing in front of the moon , high up there! ...WHY NOT?? USA and Soviet are not in competition!... Google Star City to see how far it has developed.. There are no ICBMs , it's all a scam for $$$$ Just short range missiles for Kruschev... Mmmm. Cuba would work!! the proof of Einsteins T of Relatively, getting debunked..... ISNT EVEN TAUGHT to you 'genius'...WHY NOT? Put that in your pipe and smoke it!! Now read further, smart guy. G E E , why all the secrecy 👺 💩💩 👎🏽 👿 😈 ( the moon landing tapes ALL DISAPPEARED!!) ...It's all about the $$$ and the Free Masons /Illuminati that are are in control... ...//😱. proof of a flat earth is easy. JUSTLOOKOUTTHE window inanysmallairplane Orwatchaship DISAPPEAR THENWITHBINOCULARS SEEITAGAIN TELLYOURFRIENDS BRAINWASHINGCHILDRENIS. SICK TELLYOURFRIENDS. PLEEEEZE
@joeshmoe7967
@joeshmoe7967 5 лет назад
@@Bogolyubovos You can occasionally see them pass in front of the moon. NOT with just your eyes, you would need a telescope. It would not be just some casual thing, like tossing the scope toward the moon and seeing satellites buzzing by. Also literally if you blink you would miss it. The satellites orbits were not planned so you could sit and watch them passing in front of the moon. Satellites are relatively small and a long ways away...how much detail can you see in a car 2 miles away or a 747 from 6-7 miles? Satellites are way farther. You can see satellites by eye under dark skies. You can get info as to where to look and at what time. Same with the ISS.
@kevinmould6979
@kevinmould6979 3 года назад
@@Bogolyubovos So. Living on the Moray Firth coast (North East Scotland) I should be able to point my telescope in a roughly north easterly direction and see Norway? Bloody hell, someone's stolen Norway!!!! My telescope hasn't "pulled it back over the horizon". What is this black magic?
@ulrichkalber9039
@ulrichkalber9039 6 лет назад
There is something that can be detected on the Surface of the moon: a reflector that was left there to be able to measure the distance between the earth and the moon. if a laser is aimed at the Surface of the moon it is bounced back from the reflector.The time that passes till the light is back gives an exact measure of the distance to the moon. without that reflector the reflection of the laser would be scattered and weakened beond any detection.
@craigcarlson3978
@craigcarlson3978 5 лет назад
bullshit man its fuckin bullshit
@skyscall
@skyscall 5 лет назад
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon Here ya go
@lordgarion514
@lordgarion514 5 лет назад
But that's not evidence humans landed on the moon. There's about 5 or 6 of those reflectors if memory serves. Only a couple of them were placed by humans. The rest were done the "old fashioned" way.
@Orlor
@Orlor 5 лет назад
Robert Pruitt says..."But that's not evidence humans landed on the moon." And then says..."Only a couple of them were placed by humans." Ummm...
@inkyguy
@inkyguy 5 лет назад
Ulrich Kälber, go away Russian troll. 🚫🇷🇺
@86FxBdyCpe
@86FxBdyCpe 3 года назад
Nicely done Paul. Awesome channel.
@CA-TREES
@CA-TREES 3 года назад
I like the way you explain the information. You make it very easy to understand.
@Idrisjj
@Idrisjj 6 лет назад
Thank you for a clear and concise explanation. It was a joy to watch, also I learned a few things I didn't previously know!
@jimhaut480
@jimhaut480 8 месяцев назад
Bullshit
@CliffClover
@CliffClover 4 года назад
Great job!! Thank you, love your hair by the way!
@kridadounsattapong1533
@kridadounsattapong1533 4 года назад
Wdfukc utmhh,. Isn't hkwnfs ftpn , tell world law
@Nshweeka
@Nshweeka 4 года назад
Stupid hair to depart a very smart head!
@RoBoVader
@RoBoVader 4 года назад
What hair
@albertanguttitauruq573
@albertanguttitauruq573 4 года назад
@@kridadounsattapong1533 l
@indicajohn1122
@indicajohn1122 3 года назад
@@kridadounsattapong1533 yes.
@rodneyromero5374
@rodneyromero5374 4 года назад
Thank you! Been wondering for years.
@McSynth
@McSynth 4 года назад
I love your channel. All things explained - in a sensible fashion !
@jimhaut480
@jimhaut480 8 месяцев назад
Bullshit
@meangreen7389
@meangreen7389 4 года назад
Well explained; easy to understand, thank you.
@mcgaggero
@mcgaggero 4 года назад
Always very informative and entertaining, thanks!
@jimhaut480
@jimhaut480 8 месяцев назад
Bullshit
@ronaldharris6569
@ronaldharris6569 3 года назад
I weep for humanity that can entertain the idea the moon landings were fake
@danielmaxter1928
@danielmaxter1928 3 года назад
Really???? Go look at Buzz Aldrin conversation with 8yo on Bitchute about the moon. Its not on yutube. Its censored here. Let's see if you weep after that.
@ronaldharris6569
@ronaldharris6569 3 года назад
@@danielmaxter1928 are you saying buzz is going to deny the moon landing? Buzz Aldrin the astronaut?
@peatmoss4415
@peatmoss4415 19 дней назад
@@danielmaxter1928 There you are! The Lunatic in this video thread!
@Ricardo-go7yu
@Ricardo-go7yu Год назад
Thanks mate!! I was always curious about this very idea.
@MrAlexandre15nunes
@MrAlexandre15nunes 6 лет назад
I liked, very good and simple explanation. Congrats
@chrisbaker121924
@chrisbaker121924 4 года назад
It just isn’t worth talking to anyone who doesn’t believe the moon landings happened. It makes me annoyed, goodness knows how the people involved feel. Mankind’s greatest achievement.
@williamchiafos2325
@williamchiafos2325 4 года назад
BakerCars&Hifi your mind is so closed you aren't getting enough oxygen to your brain.
@chrisbaker121924
@chrisbaker121924 4 года назад
@@williamchiafos2325 Actually, I have read all the facts, seen the hoax theories, seen an unused saturn V in the flesh and come up with my own conclusion that it did indeed happen.
@Cinemashow777
@Cinemashow777 3 года назад
This is a great video. Thanks for edification on the subject.
@trevin1691
@trevin1691 4 года назад
Thank you for the excellent breakdown love the new images at least they’re new to me
@williamk9881
@williamk9881 6 лет назад
Thanks for this!
@bodhilife6805
@bodhilife6805 5 лет назад
I loved the way he ended the video with some pure aggression in his usual calm tone.
@auletjohnast03638
@auletjohnast03638 5 лет назад
Buddha G Dhaubhadel, Buddha, may God save you. Come to the Loed Jesus Christ and you'll be saved.
@PatrickMcAsey
@PatrickMcAsey 5 лет назад
I admire the restraint and patience he deals with the loony element who deny everything.
@beanieteamie7435
@beanieteamie7435 5 лет назад
@@auletjohnast03638 Oh so a "cristian" flat earther. You are a discrace to the human race. (And all other cristians with a brain)
@auletjohnast03638
@auletjohnast03638 5 лет назад
Knoot _ , Ass hole, if you read my comment i didn't mention anything about a flat earth. I was just telling buddah to leave buddah behind and come to the Lord Jesus Christ, and so should you.
@blb-nn8rq
@blb-nn8rq 3 года назад
Great explanation. Amazed to learn.
@philippe5394
@philippe5394 4 года назад
Thank you Paul, the "Why can't we see..." is very well explained! Thank you also for all the videos.
@CS-wb8bt
@CS-wb8bt 4 года назад
Their are flat earthier’s all over the globe
@artyparis
@artyparis 3 года назад
S'il y a un complot, il est breton. La Bretagne est partout ;)
@Stefan-gh7xr
@Stefan-gh7xr 3 года назад
Because they never went to the moon! 🤣
@spacefree5183
@spacefree5183 3 года назад
They landed inside the moon cave.
@doozy284
@doozy284 3 года назад
All Lies
@CollectorsFix
@CollectorsFix 7 лет назад
Unfortunately, there's nothing you can show a conspiracy theorist that'll make them change their minds. You can literally fly the around the moon to take a look and they'll probably claim that the windows were tv screens projecting recorded images.
@imnotarobot3600
@imnotarobot3600 7 лет назад
shlibber, they don't even want to see the obvious deception that is in there face. most of them never will. they are too busy trying to fly away.
@Tigerex966
@Tigerex966 7 лет назад
You can not make that claim until it is possible to do so. Truth does not fear investigation, independent testing, or questioning the status quo.
@fromagefrizzbizz9377
@fromagefrizzbizz9377 7 лет назад
+Chuck Tryba Obvious only to those who lack the science background to understand what they're seeing, blinded by what's being told to them by their sheep masters, or both.
@TRUTHSEEKERS2012
@TRUTHSEEKERS2012 7 лет назад
CollectorsFix same with a globe head. when you grow up indoctrinated with a mind set that won't let you think any other way they call that narrow minded or closed minded. so it's the same both ways except once someone starts questioning things they actually start to see things they didn't before
@fromagefrizzbizz9377
@fromagefrizzbizz9377 7 лет назад
+Kevin Gushlaw Science is not indoctrination. A scientific education insists upon the student asking questions, and doing experiments that prove to themselves that things work the way scientists say they work. if you don't do that, you raise people who don't really understand science at all and can't use it for anything new. It's not at all unusual to see a science teacher get something wrong, and be corrected by their own students, because the student can actually prove the teacher is wrong or made a mistake. That proves that a science education works and can produce students who can think for themselves and can defend their arguments or extend them beyond where science has gotten so far. Religious fundamentalists can't prove the words in their book, they just swallow it as written. They defend it by their indoctrination, not observable fact. If you disagree, you get burned at the stake, or, just insulted a lot. Just like deniers.
@teenlearnstocook1327
@teenlearnstocook1327 5 лет назад
Just found your channel and I find it amazing thank you.
@SimonSozzi7258
@SimonSozzi7258 4 года назад
You're very convincing for a cybernetic android.
@artofnoly9754
@artofnoly9754 4 года назад
It's actually Uncle Fetser from the Addams family
@williamnordeste1169
@williamnordeste1169 3 года назад
I can't even see one hair on his head.
@override7486
@override7486 3 года назад
That's because IT'S A CYBERNETIC ORGANISM, LIVING TISSUE OVER METAL ENDOSKELETON.
@1USAUSA
@1USAUSA 3 года назад
Hey Simon, Of course you can make a convincing argument about anything and everything in this world in your favor as you please whether what you are saying is the TRUTH or NOT. What?! Are you telling me you NEVER EVER heard of LAWYERS? (ROTFLMAO!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣) LAWYERS are KNOWN to LIE through their TEETH on BEHALF of their CLIENTS making a CONVINCING ARGUMENT that their CLIENT NEVER DID what he is accused of... LMAO!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣 So, you need need to wake up and smell the coffee... ROTFLMAO!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@override7486
@override7486 3 года назад
@@1USAUSA Need more ROTFLMAOs, and shitload more emojis.
@YonHASH
@YonHASH 4 года назад
Excellent and informative video as always! :)
@jimhaut480
@jimhaut480 8 месяцев назад
Bullshit
@BlackEpyon
@BlackEpyon 7 лет назад
There is another problem with using Hubble to image the landing cites, and it's the same reason that the Hubble has the lens cover. When you are looking at a distant star, so little of the light emitted is actually heading into your telescope that it appears very faint. The moon has a very low albido, but even so, it reflects a huge amount of photons from the sun. This would not be an issue if you were far away, but the moon is comparatively very close, so if Hubble were to look directly at it, the CCDs would be bombarded with photons, and would burn out from over exposure. Not a good expenditure, especially since it's already had it's final servicing mission. During periods of high debris bombardment, such as meteor storms, Hubble will close it's lens cap, and turn towards the Earth, protecting the primary mirror from micro-meteoroid impact. The purpose of the lens cap, even when the telescope is pointed away from the storm, is because the Earth is so bright during the day, that to look at it would burn out the ultra sensitive CCDs which were designed to look at faint distant galaxies.
@BlackEpyon
@BlackEpyon 7 лет назад
***** Reaction wheels (a motorized version of what we on Earth call gyroscopes). Think about it, if it couldn't change it's direction, we'd be stuck staring in the same direction.
@BlackEpyon
@BlackEpyon 7 лет назад
***** It's altitude is slowly decreasing due to atmospheric drag. Yes, even at almost 400 miles up, there are a few atoms for it to collide against and slow it down.
@Arkalius80
@Arkalius80 7 лет назад
The Hubble has actually photographed the moon before, and it was for legitimate scientific reasons. www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/hubble_moon.html The Hubble's orbit is high enough for its decay rate to be very small. Currently, it's natural reentry will occur sometime between 2030 and 2040. It's not easy to predict precisely because there are many factors that can influence it. Chances are some effort will be made to control its decommissioning since some parts of its structure could survive reentry and thus be a hazard to people on the ground. Hubble is too close to the Earth to get a photograph of the entire planet. It's not much higher than the ISS and I'm sure you've seen pictures and video from there. Because of how fast it is moving it wouldn't be able to take useful photos of Earth's surface either.
@TheDruidKing
@TheDruidKing 7 лет назад
It's not a very low libido, I just think you showed more interest back in the 60's.
@jackfletcher1000
@jackfletcher1000 7 лет назад
The word you are looking for is ALBEDO, though the man in the moon may indeed have a very high libido
@abelisraelcruzayuso4682
@abelisraelcruzayuso4682 7 лет назад
Very good and really helpful that you included the transcript of your explanation!! Keep it up!
@jimhaut480
@jimhaut480 8 месяцев назад
Bullshit
@cogentdynamics
@cogentdynamics 4 года назад
I do enjoy your videos, thank you!
@MrMuppetbaby
@MrMuppetbaby 4 года назад
You are a gem to watch and so knowledgable about all things space and cool. Thanks so much for your efforts. Tod
@stevek8829
@stevek8829 5 лет назад
Flat earthers use GPS to get to their flat earth convention.
@ann_onn
@ann_onn 5 лет назад
They're using satellites to post on the internet too...
@Customwinder1
@Customwinder1 5 лет назад
Flat Earth Convention of Extreme Stupidity. .......FECES 💩
@ann_onn
@ann_onn 5 лет назад
Society has profited from Apollo. You, however, are keeping us in the dark ages by denying science. It's your fault we've not returned in 50 years. If it was supported better, we'd have been back decades ago. You're discrediting the memory of heroes who died to get us there, and spitting in the face of millions who dedicate their life to the science behind space technology.
@ann_onn
@ann_onn 5 лет назад
Tell me, how do you know that the Van Allen belts exist? Who told you they did?
@ann_onn
@ann_onn 5 лет назад
*@Cam* So you believe NASA?
@James-wm7zu
@James-wm7zu 5 лет назад
Passive aggressive af!! Love it!!
@tommycollier9172
@tommycollier9172 3 года назад
I have been asking this question cents 1972, Thanks for sharing
@jeffgreen3376
@jeffgreen3376 3 года назад
Neil Armstrong should have brought one of those giant flags that they drape on skyscrapers and laid it flat on the surface. Then we might be able to see it with a high-powered telescope.
@eclipsisolis
@eclipsisolis 3 года назад
That would have been a good idea but It might have been too heavy for the LM
@jeffgreen3376
@jeffgreen3376 3 года назад
@@eclipsisolis Yeah, I didn't think of that. It's probably too big and heavy for two men to carry too.
@JamesJoyce12
@JamesJoyce12 7 лет назад
Serious telescopes of any kind are judged by their Light Gathering ability not their magnification. That would be reserved for binoculars and spotting scopes.
@ffggddss
@ffggddss 7 лет назад
Actually, by their light-gathering ability, *and* their resolving power - with roughly equal importance. The former property is good for seeing faint objects; the latter is good for discerning detail in extended objects, as well as in separating close point-sources, such as double stars.
@danberry5181
@danberry5181 5 лет назад
well done ...very interesting talk ...thanks
@TheJoefussGarage
@TheJoefussGarage Год назад
Just caught this segment now, and loved it . Non believers are going not believe, it's a heir thing.. Good stuff, enjoyed it immensely.. Thanks.
@spockboy
@spockboy 3 года назад
Excellent work. Subscribed.
@ProInnocence
@ProInnocence 7 лет назад
great video! really enjoyed it!
@straightshooter8443
@straightshooter8443 6 лет назад
I love how you poked fun at the flat earthers. Great vids. Thank you for doing what you do!!!
@mohabiraq1
@mohabiraq1 6 лет назад
If someone believe the moon landing was fake that doesn't mean he believe the earth is flat.
@mgcm3590
@mgcm3590 6 лет назад
@mohabiraq1 He was poking fun at all the stupid conspiracy theories not saying they all believe the same thing... Although most of them do.
@TheLargeHardonCollider
@TheLargeHardonCollider 6 лет назад
mohabiraq1 They're both the same to me. Conspiracy-minded, science illiterate buffoons who only want to argue all day nonstop (stubborn) and stroke their own ego with more conspiracy videos. How dare you give them a real answer, lies, fake, CGI! But what would I know, I'm a paid NASA shill who only comments online for money just to hide the real truth from you.
@ruivalecastro
@ruivalecastro 6 лет назад
I respect that, as you have to respect my opinion that you are a sheep with shoes.
@joshuasmith6346
@joshuasmith6346 6 лет назад
Straight Shooter keep eating that bullshit NASA feeds you. Make sure you get a big spoon too
@AaronSchwarz42
@AaronSchwarz42 4 года назад
"Moon made of cheese & only 700 ft in diameter" said chief Flatearther
@AaronSchwarz42
@AaronSchwarz42 4 года назад
Going to the moon for fun worse than going to burning man // there's nothing happening there // its either too hot or tool cold / no nature or other people or infrastructure / cold harsh & difficult / the only reason to go to build a space port for accessing deep space & associated nuclear reactor & electric mining for mineral resources & processing into useful stuff for construction & maintenance & fueling of & at spaceport moon base etc
@artofnoly9754
@artofnoly9754 4 года назад
It's actually a family sized pizza with the lot!! (Slightly overcooked.)
@jimh4375
@jimh4375 3 года назад
It's true the moon is made of cheese, but obviously its bigger than that, at least 800 ft.
@LammaMammaplaysgames
@LammaMammaplaysgames 3 года назад
I think cheese would be more likely for it to be made of that than dust. 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
@bobboberson2024
@bobboberson2024 3 года назад
This was really interesting... Thanks!
@richardpurvis286
@richardpurvis286 7 лет назад
Excellent! Thanks - Keep it up.
@JRMorris
@JRMorris 7 лет назад
nice work as always.
@wvideoyahoodk
@wvideoyahoodk 3 года назад
Thanks for an incredible good channel. You are sooooo good at explaining and great presentation. Regards from Denmark
@executivesteps
@executivesteps 2 года назад
There was a time when you could just say “they’re too small to be seen” and people would say OK.
@rinse-esnir4010
@rinse-esnir4010 2 года назад
But some people now think that they are smarter than they really are...
@philipmcdonagh1094
@philipmcdonagh1094 2 года назад
I take it they do have satellites-probes orbiting the Moon, presumably they have cameras on board. I can see my patio table from Google Earth. So why no pictures of the landing sites.
@rinse-esnir4010
@rinse-esnir4010 2 года назад
@@philipmcdonagh1094 There are photos of the landing sites, you can even see the trails of the astronauts.
@executivesteps
@executivesteps 2 года назад
philip mc donagh It’s called the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter - it’s been there for over 10 years. All the Apollo landing sites have been photographed with reasonable resolution.
@philipmcdonagh1094
@philipmcdonagh1094 2 года назад
@@executivesteps Have to throw my peepers across that thanks
@gregoryhamlet2909
@gregoryhamlet2909 7 лет назад
For me it's the best explanation yet. Well done
@asvarien
@asvarien 6 лет назад
You could put all the conspiritards in a rocket and fly them to the moon, land right on top of one of the Apollo landers and they'd still say it was all faked. At that point I'd encourage them to go outside and check for themselves, without spacesuits.
@barrywithers8913
@barrywithers8913 6 лет назад
Thats the best idea ... I would even pay to watch it live
@truthandfactspls4116
@truthandfactspls4116 6 лет назад
Completely honestly speaking....I am not sure one way or the other. Both sides make great arguments. My great grandfather died believing the whole thing was bullshit....as I grow older, and realize that our government is shady as hell, it's really hard to tell whats real and what isn't....just my humble 2 cents :)
@mrobvious8598
@mrobvious8598 6 лет назад
TruthAND Factspls so don’t take their word for it, use science and independent verification.
@truthandfactspls4116
@truthandfactspls4116 6 лет назад
Mr Obvious oh I do...and that's why I am where I am.
@mrobvious8598
@mrobvious8598 6 лет назад
TruthAND Factspls I have only seen facts from NASA, foreign governments with independent verification, and scientists from all over the world that agree it happened. I have never seen a conspiracy “fact” that wasn’t fake or explained by science. So tell me what keeps you on the fence. And distrust for the government is not a fact, it’s an opinion. I mean real facts.
@whozthisguy
@whozthisguy 4 года назад
flatearthers: "all i heard was the end, '...and the earth is, flat.' -see? duh, we win."
@davidgerlach514
@davidgerlach514 3 года назад
well done, as always! Cheers
@aphilipdent
@aphilipdent 6 лет назад
Just have to wait for Google Moon.
@paganphil100
@paganphil100 5 лет назад
aphilipdent: No need to wait, it's already here and includes "tours" of the landing sites: www.google.co.uk/moon/
@leondeklerk907
@leondeklerk907 5 лет назад
You can check out mars as well...
@stevedowney4056
@stevedowney4056 5 лет назад
Well since you believe Google so much why don't you search white couples or search white inventors why don't you see the pictures they show you let's see how trustworthy Google is
@FeythFX
@FeythFX 5 лет назад
Steve Downey Easy to disprove. When you search for "white couple" then Google searches for everything that matches with "white couple". Yes, "Black and white couple" has "white couple" in it's title. That is a match of more than 50% (54.545454...%)! Now search for "couple white" (with quotation marks) and you end up with completely different results.
@OldFartFilms
@OldFartFilms 5 лет назад
For a time when I was young, my family lived in a town called Allandale in NSW. We had an acquaintance that has long since passed away. However, in July, 1969, he worked at the Parkes Observatory, about 450 kilometers (approx 280 miles) away. This is basically how he would, on occasion, explain things: Parkes was not the first location to receive the images. However, when the moon was visible from Parkes, the pictures were the best quality being received, so NASA switched the picture to Parkes. July is winter in Oz. It was very cold and, while waiting for the moon to rise, the telescope was struck by several strong gusts of wind, reaching 110 kmh. The telescope was forced back against the axis of its own gears, causing the tower to shudder and sway and threatening the integrity of the entire structure. Throughout the broadcast the strong winds continued. Personnel managed to keep the dish at the optimal angle, focused on the Moon. In fact, the staff at the control desk, monitored & directed the telescope without being able to turn around and view the images on TV, so important it was that he focused on tracking the telescope to retain signal reception. The weather remained bad and the operation of telescope was basically unsafe. However, the signals received & relayed for broadcast on TV were a result of maintaining the telescope dish angled towards The Sea of Tranquility, despite extremely difficult & dangerous conditions, for the entire moonwalk. Much of this is featured in the 2000 movie ‘The Dish’ which includes a lot of fictional characters & humor in retelling this historic event. People will believe what they choose to believe, I guess. I am pretty confident I know the truth.
@seaturtledog
@seaturtledog 5 лет назад
This is a great example of how many people had to track the moon mission. I'm sure every country that had a military tracked the rockets with radar due to the fact that the technology could also be used for nuclear intercontinental missiles.
@ThatGuy-ur5cn
@ThatGuy-ur5cn 5 лет назад
Every intelligent flat earther knows Australia doesn't exist. Anybody on the other side of earth would obviously fall off.
@seamus2112ophelan
@seamus2112ophelan 5 лет назад
@Nick Nack That's fucking funny!!
@bensouthwell1339
@bensouthwell1339 5 лет назад
I think it was a receiving dish on Gran Canaria that picked up the first pictures of the first moon landing....not even related to NASA,, a European project I think
@ronalddump4061
@ronalddump4061 5 лет назад
+Red: For people who are into radio, it was easy to determine where the signal could or could not originate from. You can even tell how fast the craft where the signal originated is moving toward or away from the receiver, and how fast. Fact is there was a group of Italian Hams who all thru the space race was very good at analyzing signals from space. In those days every magazine interviewed them. They were and are still very famous, and still have all the recordings they made.. But then, it would be totally impossible for you to ever visualize why you could never fake a moon mission with earth or orbit based signals. No ability to, or desire to think. Unlike you, we are not all victims of people who might want to hoodwink us. Most of it has to do with your obvious inability to visualize, your obvious inexperience with anything substantial, and your obvious, very inborn dishonesty.
@flyingmemorials4384
@flyingmemorials4384 4 года назад
Smashing! Nice work
@dorelkynaston1468
@dorelkynaston1468 3 года назад
Why would anyone thumbs down this? This is the best answer to this question I’ve wondered about for many years. I wanted so bad to buy the telescope that could view some of the debris on the moon. I love space and all the wonders waiting for us to learn out there. Thank you for posting this for us.
@James-rc6qq
@James-rc6qq 3 года назад
Because sadly, so many believe a BS and unsupported claim that man was never on the moon
@gblargg
@gblargg 2 года назад
@@James-rc6qq I like the challenges they provide and the rebuttals. I've learned a lot about the lunar missions through the doubt cast on it.
@gblargg
@gblargg 2 года назад
@JFK Clone High Presumptive. One reason to dislike is to get it out of recommendations. Also no video is perfect and some people don't like aspects of a video. You can't really expect to please everyone. I like these videos but don't get butthurt because some people don't.
@conradmbugua9098
@conradmbugua9098 Год назад
Because there's enough evidence to show we never went to the moon, even the moon rocks were found to be petrified wood. It was all staged but I know you aren't ready for the truth
@apsbox
@apsbox 4 года назад
Loved how you're making fun of flat earthers xD
@martinewaeyenbergh9502
@martinewaeyenbergh9502 4 года назад
Liar!
@davidbarnhart6228
@davidbarnhart6228 2 года назад
Feels bumpy to me.
@Sheldon.Williams
@Sheldon.Williams 2 года назад
"Earth round, shoe flat? Something doesn't add up" - Flat Earther
@pachma405
@pachma405 5 лет назад
I feel like I'm living in the middle ages after reading the comments here.
@KenyanBunnie
@KenyanBunnie 5 лет назад
pachma Yes.
@thegloriousmoodman2152
@thegloriousmoodman2152 5 лет назад
If you're referring to the elite contolling information to supress the common man, then I agree with you.
@ronpapi9539
@ronpapi9539 5 лет назад
Flat Earth...thumbs up
@razeezar
@razeezar 5 лет назад
@@ronpapi9539 Flat thumbs... Earth up
@ronpapi9539
@ronpapi9539 5 лет назад
@felix mendez NASA s got a lot of Donald Trumps on their team.All talking no proof.
@worldtvinternational
@worldtvinternational 3 года назад
I wish the flat earthers would prove their theory once and for all by jumping off the edge en masse.
@JFK-ir7yz
@JFK-ir7yz 3 года назад
What edge?
@rodman0088
@rodman0088 3 года назад
They can't get passed the armed penguins or I'm sure they'd try.
@worldtvinternational
@worldtvinternational 3 года назад
@@Plisken65 Are you a flat earther Edward?
@JFK-ir7yz
@JFK-ir7yz 3 года назад
What edge?
@JFK-ir7yz
@JFK-ir7yz 3 года назад
@stephan diehl just take a one of those Antarctic guided tours.
@davedrew9328
@davedrew9328 3 года назад
Yes it was described perfectly very interesting as usual.
Далее
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter - Eyes on the Moon
13:00
Просмотров 368 тыс.
Nvidia Debunks Conspiracy Theories About Moon Landing
14:43
надувательство чистой воды
00:28
How Earth Moves
21:37
Просмотров 29 млн
Why The World Is Rushing Back To The Moon
15:05
Просмотров 986 тыс.
The Search for Apollo 10’s Lunar Module
9:11
Просмотров 2,5 млн
TV From the Moon - Apollo's Live TV cameras
14:38
Просмотров 239 тыс.
надувательство чистой воды
00:28