Why Did Krishna Reveal The True Identity Of Karna Before The War? | JourneyThrough 

Hi, we post videos on Hindu Dharma on our channel. Please check out. www.youtube.com/@DharmaGyaani101

Yes

Lord Krishna was actually black. So was Draupadi (As a result, she is also called Krishnaveni, younger sister of Lord Krishna). For the purpose of painting, they are shown in blue.

Hi, we post videos on Hindu Dharma on our channel. Please check out. www.youtube.com/@DharmaGyaani101

Hi, we post videos on Hindu Dharma on our channel. Please check out. www.youtube.com/@DharmaGyaani101

its mahabharat opening song.. it was a really popular series

Yes - Karna is the son of Lord Surya - the Sun God & Kunti. She was given a boon by him. Karna was not her legal child (with king Pandu) - so she sent baby Karna floating down the river. The charioteer picked the baby up & took him home.

Bro pandavas also not son of pandu they born as Karna

Hi, we post videos on Hindu Dharma on our channel. Please check out. www.youtube.com/@DharmaGyaani101

@deepkadamba7083 If the mother is Kunti, and Kunti is married to Pandu Raja, then Karna will have the lineage of Pandu Raja and he will be called as Pandu putra though the biological father is Suryadev. If you see Pandavas and Kauravas history none of them were born to actual father. They always used Devaranyayam and got sons through Vedavyasa and Kunti got Pandavas from Surya, Yama, Indra and Vayu, Varuna gods. This was purposely done by all the gods and Lord Vishnu, the Protector of the worlds to establish Dharma on the Earth and get rid of sinners who practice Adharma. Also, Vishnu has to preach the rules of Dharma to future generations before they enter Kali Yuga.

You need to study Ramayana and Mahabharata. Then you will realise just how so called greatness of karna and ravana. Don't let RU-vid shorts and tv series be source of your knowledge. These media cannot provide source of what they are preaching

@@LUNDCHUSALLAH What made you think I haven't?

Well said bro.. both were somehow villainized but those days based on situations they had respective wars. Otherwise nobody is villain or hero here. Both scenarios had reasons for both parties to wage war.

No he's not villianised like ravan (who in fact was the bad guy), in fact he's shown as a good guy who was in wrong place in the wrong time. And yes he was good and a lot of good qualities. But during the time cheer haran he was the one who really instigated the crowd. In fact he was the one who gave the idea of pulling her saree and even called her whore. So, yes he was a guy with a lot of good qualities but he was not entirely innocent.

Ravan had rrapped lots of women. Last one of them jumped into fire after cursing him that he'd die if he didn't get the consent of women. That is why he didn't do it to Sita and was trying hard to get her consent. He was deluded that he was invincible because he had the blessings of Lord Brahma. Karna was obsessed about killing Arjuna because he had an inferiority complex (he was the son of a driver/charioteer). So he sided with Adharma/Duryodhana. He didn't listen to the wise counsel of Lord Krishna. He was responsible for the unjust killing of Abhimanyu because he broke the agreed rules of the war by attacking Abhimanyu from behind. He lied to Lord Parashuram that he was a brahmin and was cursed as a result. He broke rules when he wanted but would ask Arjuna to follow rules. When Lord Indra asked for his body armour as a donation he refused. (People think he was great at donating. He wasn't. If he was, he should've immediately given it to Indra. But he refused, saying his body armour was the sole reason he was alive.) Only when Lord Indra tempted him by showing the Shakti Ayudha he foolishly parted with his body armour. He gave Dushyasana the idea of forcibly removing the saree of Draupadi, an unpardonable offense. He is no hero but a villain.

listen let me clearify brother first of all santan dharma is not an mythology its our history and this war happened i think around 5000BCE when every other nation was caveman or something, we in bharat were having this war I do not know what the other religions say and i don't have the right to blame any religion whatsoever i am just a lowly human but im just asking you to respect every religion *put an end to slavery enslavers and decievers* you said this in another comment right so let me tell you souls are neither born nor they die and krishna teaches us that we have the right to work only the result giver is him and him only Krishna even didn't save the children of Draupadi or even his own sons or nephew Abhimanyu. Isn't that weird? Why? The answer is simple.Draupadi surrendered. Arjuna surrendered. Everyone else was trying to prove their might, use their own so called strength associated with their own egos, be it for or against Dharma. Each one had their own version of what they believed as right. So Krishna allowed them to get the Karma fala (results for their deeds) without any intervention. It's only when one realises that the Doer is not he but Krishna himself, he learns to detach himself from the results of his tasks and surrenders to Krishna, Krishna comes to protect him. Till you call him with complete surrender, He won't come. You are attached to your Karma, you have to reap it's fruits: be it sweet or bitter! Just offer each and every Karma of yours to Him and see, He will manage everything in the most beautiful and perfect way!

@@yuvcdrag9164 Thanks for your input. I am aware that the Cult of Science calls deep history mythology to hide the Truth and enslave modern man. There is Free Will and the song, If you love someone set them free. If.

@@AndroidSamsung-qz9pl Okk brother thank you for understanding 🫂

Finally someone with the actual truth

And karna was right

Hi, we post videos on Hindu Dharma on our channel. Please check out. www.youtube.com/@DharmaGyaani101

The name of wife of adhiratha was Radha. She is not Radha rani of Bersana.

@@Achilles-ph6wt lol oh

Hi, we post videos on Hindu Dharma on our channel. Please check out. www.youtube.com/@DharmaGyaani101

u taking about names when the story is not real

Hi, we post videos on Hindu Dharma on our channel. Please check out. www.youtube.com/@DharmaGyaani101

Source pls

@@sasmi90 Mahabharat

no he wants to kill arjuna because he made a promise to his best friend that he will do it . karna is the example of a true friend

@@samsam-xw5rw People like Bheeshma, Dronacharya and Karna used Dharmic Values/reasons/excuse to side with Adharma (Duryodhana)

Karna was jealous of Arjuna. He had an inferiority complex. He was an envious character. Source: Mahabharath ( by Sage Ved Vyasa)

Why is Karna evil?

​​@@deepkadamba7083Ravan had rrapped lots of women. One of them jumped into fire after cursing him that he'd die if he didn't get the consent of women. That is why he didn't do it to Sita and was trying hard to get her consent. He was deluded that he was invincible because of the blessings of Lord Brahma. Karna was obsessed about killing Arjuna because he had inferiority complex. So he sided with Adharma/Duryodhana. He didn't listen to the wise counsel of Lord Krishna. He was responsible for the unjust killing of Abhimanyu because he broke the agreed rules of the war by attacking Abhimanyu from behind. He lied to Lord Parashuram that he was a brahmin and was cursed as a result. He broke rules when he wanted but would ask Arjuna to follow rules. When Lord Indra asked for his body armour as a donation he refused. Only when Lord Indra tempted him by showing the Shakti Ayudha he foolishly parted with his body armour. He gave Dhushyasana the idea of forcibly removing the saree of Draupadi, an unpardonable offense

Karn is different from ravan he is more like indrajeet ​@@NicNacSM

​@@NicNacSMthere is a difference between hero and villain

@@spraveen4177 yes there is. The characters like Bheeshma, Dronacharya and Karna used Dharmic Values/reasons/excuse to side with Adharma.