Тёмный

Why Did The Confederates Lose The American Civil War? 

Подписаться
Просмотров 1 тыс.
% 23

Ever wondered why The Confederates lost The American Civil War? Find out today, watch this video.
So here it is, the full episode on the spies you've probably never heard of. The Cambridge Five
Follow us on X: nofilterhistory
Hello my friends, I am NoFilterHistory. On this channel I am hoping to do my part by increasing the world's knowledge on the world's best subject, history. If I can even make one person enjoy history more than before they met me then I have done my job! Subscribe to join the community, it is going to get really interesting.
Credit - www.ryanjjonesart.com for the animation!

Опубликовано:

 

25 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 26   
@nofilterhistory
@nofilterhistory 2 месяца назад
I’d be interested in hearing if anyone thinks we could ever see a Second American Civil War, please comment with your thoughts!
@bobsyoruncle4583
@bobsyoruncle4583 2 месяца назад
US politics is now more polarized than at any time since the Civil War - so polarized it feels like the US is teetering on the brink of anarchy or absolute tyranny - that anything is possible. I think a second "Civil War" is a real possibility though I think this would take the form more of an insurrection or second "American Revolution" than a secession of states. As Federal prosecutors found out when they tried to make a case for treason against Jefferson Davis post-war, there is nothing in the US Constitution which denies the right of any state to secede, so this option does remain on the table and could be acted upon under certain conditions. A hypothetical scenario: A very dubious Democrat victory in November is not recognized by Florida or Texas who then vote to secede - federal troops are ordered in and the country erupts in chaos and civil disobedience. If another assassination attempt on President Trump is successful this could also potentially trigger a nation-wide insurrection and perhaps even a military coup d'etat.
@nofilterhistory
@nofilterhistory 2 месяца назад
@@bobsyoruncle4583 yes, definitely agree. I think this year could be one of the most important years when it comes to writing the history books in the future. Still a long way to go as well and definitely some more twists down the road.
@bobsyoruncle4583
@bobsyoruncle4583 2 месяца назад
They lost because they attacked Ft. Sumter. The only hope for the South was to take a purely defensive posture defending their territory without provoking the Union by attacking Federal installations - this would allow time for negotiations and, failing that, would force the Union to make the first aggressive move - a move which would have faced considerable opposition in the North. A great many Northerners were indifferent to southern secession, but after the South's unprovoked attacked on Ft. Sumter, the outrage in the North insured that Lincoln would have the popular support needed to wage a war of conquest against the Confederacy. The South was doomed the moment the first cannons opened fire in Charleston Harbor.
@nofilterhistory
@nofilterhistory 2 месяца назад
Very fair analysis, and correct too
@flintlockhomestead460
@flintlockhomestead460 2 месяца назад
Ultimately the Confederates lost the war because they were outnumbered, and outproduced. This is proven by the fact that 25% of the white males of military age in 1861 in the south died in the war. The number is considered somewhere around 300 to 350 thousands. Union losses were approximately the same sizes and for the same causes. The difference was that while the southern manpower available kept shrinking that of the north kept growing. Ulysses Grant was not the butcher he is sometimes accused of being but he knew what he had and how to utilize it. So though a lot of the Lost Cause mythology may be fantasy the part about southern combat effectiveness is not. Incidentally, the last verifiable Confederate veteran died in 1951. His name was Pleasant Crump and he enlisted in the 10th Alabama in December of 1864 and fought in several battles before being surrendered at Appomattox. The last Union veteran was Albert Woolson who died in 1956...He enlisted in the 1st Minnesota Heavy Artillery in 1864 at the age of 14. That regiment never saw any combat and served only in garrison duty.
@nofilterhistory
@nofilterhistory 2 месяца назад
Incredible insight here, thanks for your comment 🤝🏼
@raulduke6105
@raulduke6105 2 месяца назад
Manpower and huge edge in industrial production
@nofilterhistory
@nofilterhistory 2 месяца назад
Ultimately, yep
@thewildwegonian92
@thewildwegonian92 2 месяца назад
The biggest problem which caused the CSA's downfall was an inconsistent approach to a general war strategy. There were two camps of thought. Strike and be aggressive to take out the Union capital of Washington D.C. vs Dig in and hold on to what we have. The 1st camp believed that unflinching aggression towards the Union capital to force a quick and swift peace to prevent a general conflict of prolonged nature. The 2nd camp believed that most Yankees really didn't want to throw away their sons and fathers to a war that didn't really affect them or their livelihoods. It was this continual indecision on the Confederate side that resulted in the war lasting as long as it did as well as Union general officers looking to strike towards Richmond being inconsistent themselves. Had the Confederacy attempted to be aggressive and followed through after 1st Manassas to drive into Washington D.C. then the war could've likely ended there. Lincoln would've been seen as a mini tyrant with his suspension of habeus corpus and the failure to calm down tension by being aggressive towards the Southern unrest and either would've been impeached or forced to resign. Consequently, had the Confederacy decided to dig in and hold their own, it is then just a matter of how Confederate generals respond to Union incursions. In our timeline unwarranted aggression towards Union forces in "opportunity strikes" saw many false victories as what was won tactically was severely lost strategically due to the Confederacy's lack of industry and supply/manpower base to be able to recover losses over the course of the war. There is no certainty about if the Confederacy could've won the war, but there is a likelihood of potential victory had certain strategic decisions been made in certainty rather than the variable nature that is seen throughout the war. As a southerner and someone born from Mississippi, it is easy to see why the Confederacy lost due to how the trend of the national government and actions of many of its general officers did over the course of the war and the subsequent casualty counts for major engagements.
@nofilterhistory
@nofilterhistory 2 месяца назад
You should make your own video on the topic, great analysis here 👏🏻
@thewildwegonian92
@thewildwegonian92 2 месяца назад
@@nofilterhistory I appreciate the comment. I've always wanted to try to get into content creation, but with the place I live and no proper equipment the most I was ever able to do was either my phone or the free trail of I think it was bandicam way back when I first got my laptop and before my pc. Though now and again I do like to get some "deep" convos with one of my friends that tends to record some games we play. Makes for a nice dynamic from the goober moments lol. Best wishes to you and keep up the awesome work.
@nofilterhistory
@nofilterhistory 2 месяца назад
@@thewildwegonian92 you could start with written content on X and see how things progress, thanks for your comment and all the best.
@lopido775
@lopido775 2 месяца назад
They had no chance Just like the Germans in ww2
@nofilterhistory
@nofilterhistory 2 месяца назад
I think the Germans could have gotten much closer than we would like to imagine
@jwhiskey242
@jwhiskey242 2 месяца назад
It was the North's war to lose.
@benquinneyiii7941
@benquinneyiii7941 2 месяца назад
They were outgunned
@johnhallett5846
@johnhallett5846 2 месяца назад
not enough of a population; no real industrial base; not enough money.
@nofilterhistory
@nofilterhistory 2 месяца назад
Simple enough way to put it, and correct
@patrickhenry7721
@patrickhenry7721 2 месяца назад
The primary reason for secession was undoubtedly the maintenance of slavery, however secession is not war. Do States have a right to leave the Union, this was the question to be settled by war.
@bobsyoruncle4583
@bobsyoruncle4583 2 месяца назад
there is nothing in the US Constitution which denies the right of any state to secede - and this remains true today. After the war, Federal prosecutors tried for 2 years to put together a case for treason against Jefferson Davis but gave up when they could find no constitutional basis to support the charge.
@charlessaint7926
@charlessaint7926 2 месяца назад
Two historical quotes and one fictional: Confederate General Isaac Trimble, after the failure of Pickett's charge, he was wounded and captured. While in a field hospital, Trimble remarked, "If the men I had the honor to command that day could not take that position, all hell couldn't take it." Years after the war, former-General George Pickett was asked, why did his charge at Gettysburg fail? He replied, "I always thought the Yankees had something to do with it." "We won not because we had more money, more guns, more ships, horses, or the like. We won because of one simple fact, our boys were better."~Captain Nedville Stevens.
@fredsmith8498
@fredsmith8498 2 месяца назад
The South only had to give up slavery. Even a gradual emancipation would have brought british recognition. Also, thousands of slaves could have been used as soldiers and support personal
@mikedroz2301
@mikedroz2301 2 месяца назад
Because the North had unlimited poor immigrants to throw into the meat grinder
@jwhiskey242
@jwhiskey242 2 месяца назад
Yes, the played out "Yankee Hirelings" excuse.