Europe will stop it's immigration disaster eventually. It's just a question of how poor and violent it gets before the politically correct charade ends. People will eventually put their own survival over that of incompatible foreigners.
Yes but by that time Europe will be in permanent strife and inner conflict between muslims and normal human beings who aren't brainwashed with insanity. Just like Lebanon.
and what are goin to do with the millions living here? living in slums all sucking tax money? i think europe is done, these people will bring us all down except if we get somebody with balls and mass deport them by force.
Well this immigration or movement of people was sped up by purposeful means, so many European went in a few decades from "restricted immigration" to 1/5 or 1/3 immigrant population compared to the whole populace.
1. Only a few European countries had colonies. 2. Europe doesn't owe anyone anything and doesn't have to open its borders to everyone. 3. You should hold everyone to the same standards you hold Europeans.
1. The only countries that did not, were the eastern european ones. Those are currently also the ones economically behind and usually do not take as many refugees as the economically strong ones (e.g. Germany). Nevertheless, they profited off cheap prices from other countries' colonies indirectly and also they are also contributing to climate change. But I think it is generally ackowledged that richer countries with a worse history of colonialism and exploitation are expected to host more refugees. 2. Yes, Europe does owe its former colonies. The crimes commited by our ancestors might not be ours, but since the wealth we inherited was criminally aquired, it does comes (in my opinion) with the duty to repay it. And even if we would not owe anything to anyone, it would still be the right thing to do. We help people in our own country through welfare if they have problems. Just because Africa is physically far away that should not mean our empathy should stop at the border. It is a human trait to feel less empathy for people farther away, but human evolution has continously widened the range at which we can empathize and that is a good thing. 3. Yes. And that is what is continously done. But keep in mind that in third world countries, often the state does not represent the will of the people (due to curruption and dictatorship) and hence the citizens are largely not at fault for the crimes of such states. One mroe note: people underestimate the lasting effects, things like occupations and colonialism can have. Eastern germany is significantly behind western germany economically, and this just came from a bit over 40 years of soviet control. And I think it is hard to argue that eastern germans are genetically or culturally different to western germans. African countries have been exploited way harder for way longer, and artifically-drawn new borders and western coups for political destailization come on-top of that.
@@lanetderaffe2069 1. Economically behind? Poland is on track to over take Germany is 2040. Also if it's such an economic win why doesn't these poor nation fight over taking in as many refugees as possible? Why do the EU try to make them take them on? It's obviously not because of immigration that western Europe have economic growth. We someone manage to have economic growth DESPITE it, not because of it. If you want to point to BNP you must divide it on the population as well and even then the founder of BNP said it shouldn't be used to judge a nations prosperity. 2. Okay in that case? Do Sweden owe the English for the Viking invasions? Do the Turks have to pay back to the Greeks, bosnians ect? This is called the blame game. Are you sure you want to play that game? Also Sweden never had colonies. So why should we help anyone in Africa? We also invented penicillin. Who have saved far more people than we ever hurt in Africa. That must mean that African countries and the world in general owes Sweden? Or we only count all the bad things? It's not a lack of empathy that I have it's that it's not my responsibilities to make sure that other people prosper. Nor is it my government job to make sure that other people prosper. 3. Most western governments do not represent their citizens either. Name me a government in the West that have more than 50% approval rating? Winning an election shouldn't be enough to make you represent the people. If I vote for someone and they don't do what I want they no longer represent me. No people are responsible for the actions of their government or you can twist it and say all people are responsible for their government. As it's the peoples job to change the government if it's bad and doesn't do what it should. You last note doesn't make sense. Poland was occupied up until 1994 by the Sovjet Union, one of the most evil, oppressively and abusive countries in human history. The Jews the most oppressed people in all of human history by far. Is also prospering and are rich. If you look at most of human history being occupied is nothing out of the ordinary nor is recovering from it. Also to bring up Poland again before the Sojet union, there was the russian occupation, before that The Deluge. I bring this up to show that Africa is not a special place that have been abused to some unique level as you claim. Plus Polands current borders are also artificially drawn mind you. Poland never looked like that historically. Along with India once again nothing special or unique. India was also a colony mind you. Sure I will grant that some disadvantage is at hand but nothing even remotely to this level. The problems that africa is having is mostly self inflicted. They could be rich and prosperous but they aren't despite having been free for so long. It's not our fault at this point. What if 100 more years pass and they are still poor? Still our fault? Still us to blame? Still our responsibility?
@@Gangstergranny1950 Then say that instead, that you don't want want any immigrants in your country or in Europe. If they are already in your country it makes more sense to care for them than to not care for them since it costs you more not to. If they are already in your country they are your people already unless you have some racial or nationalism basis that you want to mention as well. The same capitalist policies and companies that put your fellow country men on the street are the same ones that forces immigrants into your country.
its barly white ppl left in England and France. London with its 9 000 000 ppl, less than 33% are ethnic Englishmen, less than 50% In Manchester are Englishmen, less than 43% in Birmingham. white ppl are old, immigrants are young. in 20 years, only 40 % or so in uk are Englishmen, ppl even say only 40% in France today are frenchmen, rest are africans, North Africans, muslims, Arabs, asians.
if you're thinking with violence, it only gonna make things worse, for everyone, for you and your kids. Violence its what got us in this mess in the first place..
But not only EU is subject to mass immigration. For example, hundreds of thousands of Central Asians and South Caucasus people become naturalized Russian citizens every year and even the war didn't stop the process, although slowed it down a bit. And let me not talk about Norway and UK.
like it or not, just being in the Europe allow a lot of countries to benefit from colonization, even though they are not technically in the EU (Switzerland is a good example, they are technically neutral, but they are used by colonizing countries to safeguard their money, thus, indirectly profiting from colonization)
@@skyfeelan European economic development and service industries benefited many nations. Some colonized nations used other European colonizers for their benefit. Many anti colonial organizers went to London or Paris to study anti colonial scholarship and write important anti colonial documents. That doesn't make London's or Paris' part in colonialism any less, but it does show colonies getting a rare (very rare) benefit from the colonizers.
Great analysis but as a citizen from a north African nation I have to correct you in just one thing: it's not colonialism it's corruption. the top 5 obstacles that cause underdevelopment in MENA are: corruption, corruption, corruption, corruption and corruption.
@@Mongol_Invasion Because we failed in nation building game, from pastoral medieval society with medieval mindset in governing and ruling to modern time without changing the core just adding make up of supposed democracy and modernity
Everybody knows it is not colonialism, if anything colonialism made those countries richer, the colonialists build: railways, harbours, roads, entire cities, learned western languages like Spanish, French and English what is now highly beneficial for trade with the west. But, those countries just want reparations from the west, nothing is better than free money, so they keep yelling that it is colonialism.
Colonialism has been over for 60 years. Singapore and Hong Kong are both former colonies and are wealthy. The true problem is Middle Eastern and African culture (corruption).
Yes and no, Africa and the 2 micro nations you mention are in different worlds and had different outcomes from colonialism. Both of those were used as big trading hubs, and are also very densely populated now. A better example would have been somewhere like India, which lost its colonial rule at a similar time and is now coming into its own whilst maintaining its 'native' culture unlike say Australia or Canada which are majority European heritage. Not to say India doesn't have its own problems, but its people generally aren't attempting to illegally migrate on this scale and its growth is trending well in the past couple decades and though Modi has turned more authoritarian, from the outside corruption appears to be improving and government isn't at least actively making things worse like some countries in Africa.
The issue with India was Indians were taught from the beginning to hate the indigenous cultures and how inferior they are compared to outsiders. Modi as you mentioned came on the power of Indian nationalist ideologies and this ideology is actually keeping the economy roaring as India itself is a very diverse country and it's this nationalism which brought most people under a same banner and pass the needed reforms.
A country does not necessarily need resources to develop. The most important thing is a stable government. This can be seen very clearly in the example of Singapore.
😂ah but wait your Green Energy will be European from Morocco... your raw material will come from Africa! Your labor comes from OUTSIDE even the recruitment of your army comes from africa... but you are right this is all AFRICAN OUR RAW MATERIAL OUR LABOR AND SOON OUR OWN MOROCCAN GREEN ENERGY IN EU
@@Respectedideas No, because indigenous people lost their territory. It was a war, and they lost. European people EARNED those lands. While in Europe it's the european people who are commiting suicide themselves by inviting anyone. Tottaly different things.
And how will you do this? Even if we build a 5m high wall it wont stop them, if anything it will cause more business for smugglers because, as is said in the video, companies want cheap workforce, even if it's illegal. Also, where else will they flee, if not to the richest part of the world?
@@Olp-t7j that’s only because illegals don’t fear any consequences because politicians are corrupt and weak sink their boat cut off welfare benefits and they will stop coming and leave
@@Olp-t7j Egypt built a wall, and the Palestinians didn't get in. Saudi Arabia shoots at Palestinian, Syrian and Yemeni migrants, and they don't come back. Pakistan was able to remigrate millions of Afghans in less than two months... What's stopping Europeans from doing the same thing?
@@Olp-t7j Well we should make a distinction between students, legal migrants, illegal migrants and actual refugees. As for legal migrants, there is no problem there, follow the proper procedures and you can come if you have work, but lose that work and you have 3 months to find new employment or face deportation, just like for internal EU migration. Upon comiting any crime legal migrants lose their legal migrant status and face deportation, the local population is after all not responsible to suffer the consequences of the illegal activities of imported criminals. Students can come, but can't work more then laws applicable to local youths. Work too much, don't attend classes or comit any crime and you lose your student status and face deportation. Studying in a European country should not give residency or work rights after the study is complete. For the other 2, build 2 types of migration camps in every EU country paid for by the international aid budgets of the EU countries. Camp A for refugees with identity papers in the process of having their status confirmed. Like low security prison with recreational activities, internet/phone access and educational opportunities including learning the local language. Known criminals should not have the right to request asylum. Camp B segregated by sex and age for all illegal migrants, all those who tossed their passport into the Mediterranean sea, all failed asylum seekers, able bodied men of fighting age fleeing war instead of helping defend their homeland and all those who should be deported but can't be due to non cooperation of their own government. Like max security prison. People in camp A move to camp B upon comiting any crime including presenting forged documents or lying during their asylum application and lose their right to request asylum, actual refugees are after all not responsible to suffer the consequences of illegal activities from imported criminals. Upon granting asylum, provide access to social security for 3 months after that they are on their own and should have been able to find work or an educational opportunity which extends the social security access. Provide mandatory language lessons for all asylees, adults and minors and I can't stress minors enough here because currently western European governments are wasting the efforts of teachers on helping those who don't even speak the language in which they are being taught instead of helping their own young citizens with learning problems. Upon resolution of the conflict they fled from immediate deportation to the country of origin. Taking vacations in the country you fled from should obviously invalidate refugee status as should comiting any crime and make the person an illegal migrant. For those in camp B, regular deportation flights paid for by the aid budget and this is going to sound tough but if they want to rob, rape or kill each other, let them, the guards should after all not risk their lives for people who shouldn't even be here. Once a year or so documentaries should be made about camp B and made publicly available on the internet and be put in the public domain so they can be spread freely to deter any illegal migration. Naturalization, as in changing nationality, and family reunification schemes should be reserved for EU citizens only. Edit> EU citizens who house or employ people who should be in camp B or take advantage of students or legal migrants should be fined or imprisoned for their crimes as should NGO leaders, funders and activists who are "helping" the migrants come to Europe because what they are essentially doing is organizing, funding and comiting human traficing.
"The European Union and all leaders of all European countries MUST USE IMMIGRATION to undermine the homegenity and ethnic identity of the native European people no matter how difficult this will be to explain to the citizens of their nations. This must happen, thus will happen for globalism to take hold of Europe." (UN Bilderberger Peter Sutherland speaking in the House of Lords, 2014). This literally is a re-placement.
I’m from Poland and I think this is being used to Unite the EU into a single country, which I’m not totally against but it’s unethical. This is because when you’re a normal Pole standing in front of a Mosque on your street with a woman covered from head to toe and call to prayer heard in the background you start to realise that maybe the German over the border is not that different from you as you once thought, in comparison to the rest of the globe.
This is why you begin to hear people saying Europe for Europeans more and more often, rather than people saying Denmark for Danes or Slovakia for Slovaks etc.
@@IhaveBigFeet That might have been true if there weren't as many, and the media actually reported on migrant crime. But right now if you look at youngest generations in Germany, most of them have migrant background, and migrant crime is swept under a rug. Remember that Afghan guy killing a policeman in Germany recently? Barely received any coverage.
it has nothing to do with the Arab spring. I have been living in Turkey and Algeria in the 80ies. Main question of the youth was, how do I immigrate to the rich west. I 've been living in Egypt between 2002 and 2006, same question!
@skasteve6528 There's a difference between saying a nation is a kleptocracy and being a kleptocracy. The Soviet Union loudly proclaimed it was a democracy, that was a lie. European intellectuals have been announcing the death of America since the 1780s. Does that seem honest? Screaming hate at America does nothing to heal MENA. In fact, it only allows fools and frauds cover. Don't be part of the problem even if you aren't capable of helping.
@fn3516 It goes way back. I've read historical documents (in translation, I admit) from Summer and Ur to the present. Corruption seems to have been the norm. Rare governments and rulers have stopped it for a while, but it returns. Most serious commentators from within or without of MENA societies and cultures treat it as a preexisting cultural feature. However, I am from the US. We once accepted rule by a king that's gone. Slavery was defended by many churches and held to be allowed by God. That's gone. Jim Crow, laws defining women as minors, laws outlawing homosexuality, all these are gone. All progress is contested. And European critics still deny that Americans can be full human beings in our own right. But if we can change, who are we to say that the people of MENA are helpless to change their societies.
@1wun1 Some died of old age, others died in different ways. The reforms or improved laws fell into disuse. Corruption routinely snuck back. It does in most places, MENA is worse off than most, but corruption in MENA is different in volume and outrageousness. But otherwise, it's the same old garbage.
@@lonalxaia well idk which one but if you see the comments here and on other videos, they can't silence the overwhelming sentiment of everybody who's worried about this anymore
oh haha I actually deleted one here about Islam because it wasn't so related to the video... plenty of other good comments about colonialism but I moved that comment to a good video about migrants in Sweden >> ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-951jyOOxE7s.html&pp=gAQBiAQB
well can you choose another leave with having a coup next day or even escape uncle sam control without getting sanctions or even boomed because uncle sam is afraid for his security lol , if you can do that then it is corruption , otherwise you still under the US fruit company look like
The extractive colonial institution set up by Spain led to the current corruption and stagnation in Latin America. Plus US will never let a power house being formed never it's borders and even continent.
Yes but a lot of latin american politics have been influenced/ manipulated by america to push an agenda which benefits them and this is just another way of neocolonialism.
Just saying stuff such as your, ‘People like this guy…’ doesn’t help anyone’s thinking. You offer no explanation or reasoned criticism of his position, you just make a dull grunt in his general direction. Why not explain to us where his exposition of ideas goes wrong? Is it that you don’t actually know? Or is it that you just can’t be bothered?
@@petersherwood5887 Yeah, one can't be bothered because a single YT comment can't make up for a fundamental lack of history education, intuition and ethnic consciousness. One shouldn't have to explain what should be perceived on an instinctive level. The things this guy says are common, and they're repulsive. If you want to get an idea why, read the comment section. Here's some top comments: "Europe for European, supporting from East Asia" "Stop giving them benefits and housing" "It can be stopped very easily actually." "I’m a latin american citizen and also don’t think it’s colonialism, but corruption as mentioned in the other comment." "this video is just collective guilt." "The EU is not Europe." "Europe for Europeans" "1. Only a few European countries had colonies. 2. Europe doesn't owe anyone anything and doesn't have to open its borders to everyone. 3. You should hold everyone to the same standards you hold Europeans." TL;DR: "We for ourselves" is a common sense position. To ask anyone to abandon that position the burden of proof is on the person who demands that. And all he does is spout generic CRT bullshit from his Marxist college professors. The guy who made this video is a shill for the opposite of the values the most popular and common sense comments embody.
No we have not, if you live in Poland you would know how quickly it is changing, used to be rare to see a non European now go through Warsaw and it’s looking like a French city, albeit not to the same extent yet. We’ve given out more work permits than any country in Europe, and no it’s not just for Ukrainians we made a deal with 10-15 third world nations like Nigeria and India allowing them easy access for work permits. Recently on our border with Belarus a soldier was stabbed to death by Syrian migrants.
@@tomorrowneverdies567 It's almost like Poland doesn't have a free-for-all welfare state and useful idiots with 'refugees welcome'-signs waiting on train stations.
@@tomorrowneverdies567why don't they go to Poland? Because Poland doesn't give various benefits to migrants, and it's working, so other European countries should follow their example
7:55 "they never got a chance to develop or gain their own wealth because of that" Vietnam also was a French colony. How do you explain the economic success of Vietnam ?
Vietnam isn't rich either, its GDP per capita is less than $6000 and its economic success has been fairly recent, even within the global south, some countries have far more tragic fates than others
Communism, contrary to popular narrative the USSR pretty much uplifted their subjects like Vietnam, Eastern Europe and even China, making them easily integratable into the west's economy.
@@Muhammad_Ahmad_ Vietnam is getting richer every year. It might not be a rich country, but it's a progressing country that gets better each year. It's about societal values and low corruption. East Asia is improving rapidly because of their work ethics and shared values. Africa and the middle east are ruined by Islam and other types of societal values that are batshit insane
@@vornamenachname1069 Hing Kong and Singapore are city states located on strategic geographical areas, even though india is poor some of it cities can be classified as middle income, as for brazil, south Africa or Indonesia, they are developing economies not wealthy economies
@idcaf No, shame on you. I have watched it, and I just gave one of many criticisms of the video. I don't have the time to give a list of criticisms, but I have time to give one criticism, plus you haven't disproven what I said.
Abolishing the unworkable asylum ideal would instantly make illegally travelling to Europe futile. Mass inward Immigration is obviously desirable to the ruling class so that isn't going to happen,
If colonialism is the main problem, why has Singapore managed to develop? The problem that these countries have is that they are unable to create a stable government, which is the prerequisite for foreign capital to come into the country and create jobs. Which then leads to the development of a stable economy.
Singapore received massive foreign investment similar to countries like China, Japan or Korea, countries that have not developed or have very low levels of foreign investment or no investment at all, similar to what happens in Africa, economic experts believe that Africa's problem is multiple, they are too ethnically divided, they are far from economic centers or maritime routes, a culture of corruption inherited from colonialism. Singapore is very lucky to be in one of the most important economic centers on the planet in addition to applying reform in the 80s that gave rise to the current Singapore.
It is important to keep in mind that African countries like Kongo do not even have control over their mining resources, 95% of all their mining resources are controlled by multinationals that have their headquarters in developed countries, in other words, Africans have nothing, nor do they have any possibility of escaping their poverty.
@@eltecnico9541dont be silly, other low incestment countries like Vietnam have managed to develop quite well. moreover many African countries have quite some riches as natural resources. Dont point fingers and play the victim game.
The west and other nations have meddled in their affairs and started and financed wars in those countries. The ones that are rich are backed by the west. Syria, Iraq, yemen, and Libya were quite safe prior to their respective wars.
@arslanrauf3641 what? The only outlier is Guinea Ecuatorial, they still have the highest GDP per capita in Africa, Seychelles is way above the average as well.
most of the unstable countries who are like this because of colonialism, have been under Ottoman rule at some point or another. curiously the Balkans have had the same problems after gaining independence from the ottomans as well. Look at a map of when a territory was colonized, because most of the north African colonies were not colonized first by European powers. They were conquered after the many wars and the decline of the Ottoman empire. With countries like Syria, only being occupied after ww1, which is about 150 years after industrialization began in Western Europe. How did all of those North African and middle eastern regions not industrialize in their 150 years before being colonized by western powers? China began industrializing. Japan successfully industrialized, why did the regions under the ottoman empire not industrialize?
@@typicallatenightgamer7122 except for Turkey itself, lmao Also North Africa was actually colonized first by Europeans, by the Romans. The ottoman territory pretty much matches with the most of the romans’
@@PresidentFlip if you wish to go that far in history, wasn't Spain colonized first by the north African Carthaginian empire which used it to mine silver in order to rebuild their economy and army to attack Rome again? followed by becoming a roman colony, followed by getting constantly invaded by Muslim empires which wanted to use it as a bridge for further European expansion. Spain seems fine now.
@@typicallatenightgamer7122 I never said it wasn’t. Just correcting you. And the main point being Turkey itself is the exception out of that region. Settle down kid
except during the ottoman empire countries were more like states than pure colonies and there was a push to make things better in those countries instead of strictly pillaging them and taking the highest possible cut from their natural resources. That's why for example in Algeria the ottoman "colonization" lead to one of it's golden ages, where it became a superpower in the Mediterranean sea in the late 18th century, before it got colonized by France which started by destroying as much of it's culture as possible to make it reliant on France before leaving it a barren scientific and medical wasteland (that was only saved by the USSR's help). To this day France still has a huge share of the resources in Algeria and France's Total even tried to do fracking to extract shale gas below the biggest underground water reserves (which would have polluted it), despite it being illegal in France.
@@taknoef9195I found the American. Europe is big. Name the countries that colonized, and then name the rest that didn't. The ones that were not colonial powers should suffer? Should we southeastern Europeans flood en masse to idk, Turkey, for colonizing and enslaving most of our regions?
@@mythoed6651 france is a great example, most of the immigrants there are coming from their former colonies, same with the UK most of their migration is coming from nigeria, india and hong kong all former colonies, no suprise the largest Ethiopian immigrant community is in Italy since they had previously colonized them too
@@VanDeutscheHammerdependent? You need to be independent, thinker and financially. You cannot depend on the government. I think Europe is over, they already had a lost decade in the 2010s now is their second one. It is done economically. There is a Dutch RU-vidr that blame the fall of communism in eastern Europe, I couldn't disagree more, it was the 2008 crisis and the pension crisis in Greece that caused Europe to stagnate. Greece adopting the Euro was the worst decision ever made.
@@diegoyanesholtz212 yes but I mean to help foreign countries from these foreign manipulation techniques, many of the worlds problems are blamed away from the self and are externalized to corporations and governments. Don’t invest in domestically owned companies in the south, the issue is foreign dependence altogether. Once you become foreign dependent, these entities will go the easiest route which will involve a country with self manipulation within its culture and you will force yourself to feel inner guilt because that’s what a foreign dependent citizen does. You need to exit the psychological trap from within yourself.
Isn't it a little bizarre that the problem is still not properly identified, or named? Most EU citizens have no problem with immigration, only with a specific type of immigration, namely Muslim immigration.
Depends on how many there are. If more people come than the infrastructure can be expanded in the same period, a shortage arises. If this continues for too long, as in Germany, for example, then acceptance decreases rapidly. And because governments have ignored this for so long, right-wing parties are coming to power in almost every country, in the hope that they have the balls to do what is necessary.
That's not true, if it wasn't for the muslims you would want the poles out of germany/UK. If it wasn't for the poles you would want the jews out of germany/UK. If it wasn't for the jews you... I can go on and on. The truth is we need to cut welfare and deport anyone who is a criminal and publicize this in the media and make an example so potential criminals think twice before doing anything bad.
Being Portuguese, oh yeah we owe our ex colonies so much, especially Angola and Mozambique. The poor darlings, who kept fighting among themselves for power, oil and diamonds for near 40 years, aided by the USA on one side and the USSR on the other. The roads, railways, dams, bridges, power centrals we left, bombed time and time again. Those in power? Stole absolutely everything they could for themselves and family with no interest whatsoever in improving the country. The old colonialism rhetoric got old long ago.
Those abusive rulers for the most part were the successors of the colonial powers and most directly obedient to the former colonial powers' heads of state : Bokassa was Valéry Giscard d'Estaing's personal friend. Algeria never was independent for real : the French deep state has always selected the rulers. I know less about the Portuguese Empire except that they were not very good at modernizing their own country let alone their colonies under Salazar. They built a few prestige monuments and touristic attractions but very little more.
You stole our resources and your companies still have control over our resources, colonialist and it's effects are still been seen today and will probably never cease 🤦🏽🤦🏽
You pretty much followed the proper White Progressive talking points. Just to add a small balance you give a very brief mention to domestic chaos and fast a lighting mention of China. Africans are just little side players in the mess that is Africa.
This video doesnt even seem to be political dude, hes just explaining how the system creates immigrants and how it'll never end unless theres change. Are you on the side of multinational exploitative corporations? And technically Europe and the US has been doing it a lot longer than China lol. Domestic chaos is bad but what does it matter if any time they get a good leader they get killed by the west..?
Africa has some of the most cørrupt inept leaders on the planet. Uganda recently discovered trillions worth of gold, that means everyone in that country should benefit… but will they? Likely the answer is no, it’s just a very small percentage at the top that will benefit from that.
The video basically says, that colonialism is the main reason for the current migration crisis and blames Europe for past exploitation. While colonialism did cause a lot of harm, it is not fair to blame today's Europeans. Many European countries have given a lot of development aid and set up programs to help former colonies. The fact that some African governments misused this aid shows that the responsibility for current problems is more complex and includes local issues.
The issue is oil business being able to act as morden day colonialism. They all have money in goverments' pockets not just in the EU but those former colonies countries too to keep their corporate interest. They incite corruption and it's basically all infected in some form.
@@fuzzy7644 While some businesses act unethically and contribute to corruption, calling this "modern-day colonialism" and blaming only Europe is an oversimplification. Many problems in developing countries are rooted in local government failures, internal conflicts, and global economic influences from various countries, not just Europe. European nations have provided substantial development aid and support to help former colonies achieve sustainable growth and better governance. When this aid is misused by local governments, it highlights the complexity of the issues, involving both local and international factors. Which means that the responsibility is shared and multifaceted, not solely Europe’s fault.
You want to have the cake and eat it. You basically admit that europe is the reason africa has lost 400 years of development but then that they should just accept it and live as slaves to the current multinationals from europe and US that work there tax free and offer too much export at low costs for any possible competition. The neocolonialism that is spoken about in the video is further elucidated by monopolies of european multinationals that have become the inly source of work for the african population. And the violent outbursts and rebellions caused by economic/political destabilization caused by european colonialization/meddling in political affairs should just be accepted by the average person living in those african countries? Without them blaming europe and wanting to immigrate for a chance for a future? Notice i dont say better future because you have turned Africa into a place where a future is not even possible. In a way what you're saying is that it's true that europe took Africa's future and they should just lie down and die with that. You caused the immigration crisis and likely in 50 years africa will be an empty anarchy cause of you. But the people living there should just starve and die in what was left over after you extorted it and your companies keep extorting it through their monopolies. Europe's development aid never went to africans. European development aid went to european multinationals to fund europeans to come work in africa to set up stations where only europeans know hiw thr stations worked. Meanwhile your development aid personnel have been shown to have exchanged sexual favours for admission to the development aid stations. You see what is missing? No development for africa it was just development aid that went straight back into the pockets of european multinationals and workers. Your wealth was build on the backs of africans for 400 years and now you want to just let the people you extorted fester in the situation that you caused. Look at your so-called "golden ages" when did they take place? All of them during imperialism. Then a product of the gains of that golden age is the industrialization. Without imperialism Europe would not even be a super power as all your cheap trading routes and spice trade was built on African backs. USA would likely not even exist if Europe didn't see the prospects of bringing slaves to work the fields there. Most likely Africa can't be fixed anymore. Any chance for regulation and government would be corrupted by potential deals with companies who will promise the government billions in exchange for cheap labor and no taxation basically emulating slavery. All Africa's resources go to external multinationals and all the governments are enslaved by the european multinationals' money. Africa is basically the true underclass of europe. Slowly the chinese will do the same thing in Africa until the whole country is empty because it is an uninhabitable hell hole with no prospects. The only thing europe can do at this point that wouldn't be corrupted by your multinational monopolies is allow Africans to come to Europe so that freedom from an impossible situation in Africa can be obtained. And now you even want to block that. I need you to see how unfair it is that you have caused a situation in Africa where people cannot start businesses, cannot profit from local investments, cannot profit from foreign investments. And at the same time now they supposedly cannot even leave. Without leaving Africans will have to die as they work as slaves in your sweatshops. Leaving is the only opportunity left for africans... And that is because you are and likely forever will still be taking everything through your zero taxed companies that bribe the local government.
I do agree that colonialism was a horrible thing. At the same time, it's not there for quite a while now. It's like having bad parents can really screw up your childhood, but at some point, you should stop blaming your parents and get your life under control. Always looking at the past is counterproductive.
@Dunsly you see, while I do agree that Western multinationals only make things worse, West can't fix African problems alone. The "They are just victims, only the whites can solve their problems" mindset is also some form of racism. 3d world country can only be moved out of poverty from within, not from outside.
The video does go into detail explaining that colonialism never truly ended in Africa and that in the rare case a country does manage to genuinely try and break away, their governments are overthrown by American and European powers.
@tomeekun this video is a bit one-sided. While indeed multinationals try to influence, there are many occurrences when they failed to do so. You only can play colonialism when you have boots on the ground, when you can use violence to force your will. At this point, it's no longer possible.
Not just oil, its western companies and the governments they influence in general. The oil companies are not really different from any other companies on a fundamental level, they want profit and they find people, situations and countries to exploit to get it.
@georgemx4136 Right, the government officials who demand the massive brides are poor, innocent children exploited by those mean western companies! Imagine putting the blame on a profit seeking organisation rather the national governments.
Why don't the former colonies in Asia have this problem? Let's take Singapore as an example. Now you will notice that the arguments mentioned in the video no longer hold. What is the logical consequence of this? Framing was used.
@@georgemx4136 The reason why countries do not develop is because they do not have stable governments. However, this is a basic requirement for a country to develop and achieve prosperity.
“Africa never had the chance to develop on its own or gain its own wealth. They also never had the chance to industrialize.” To be fair it seems unlikely this would have ever happened organically at all in Sub-Saharan Africa. The geography of the region does not seem to encourage societal or economic developments in a vacuum. Human cultures are a product of their Geographic circumstances. The extraction of raw resources from Sub-Saharan Africa without investing that wealth back into the region certainly did not aid long term development, but on the other hand Sub-Saharan Africa would be even less developed and even more lacking in necessary infrastructure than it already is without European intervention in the Colonial era. Colonialism is an incredibly complex and nuanced subject. It is not a simplistic topic with easy answers. Trying to paint it as an inherently evil chapter of history that left nothing but tragedy and instability in its wake does not do the topic justice. There is a quite noticeable cultural undercurrent within Africa and the Middle East of blaming their former colonial masters for all their societal problems and corruption. This is often accompanied by not examining their own cultural contexts and also what their own nations could have and should have done differently since achieving their long sought after independence. The growing migrant communities forming in Western Europe are often bringing these unfortunate sentiments with them, and as a result are often not very appreciative of their new host countries. European nations themselves are frequently blamed for the lack of integration with African and Arab migrant communities. However again there seems to be a strong cultural incentive within these communities themselves discouraging assimilation. This will of course lead to tensions. Large areas of East Asia were also part of the European colonial empires. However most East Asian nations do not seem to have such resentment towards their former European colonizers, and although not necessarily becoming rich, East Asia has faired much better than Africa or the Middle East since independence. If I believed the argument that Colonialism was a justification for open borders and mass immigration (which I do not), then this argument would only be Valid against France and Britain who controlled the lion’s share of Africa and the Middle East. Countries such as Scandinavia and Ireland would still not be obliged to host massive and ever growing numbers of migrants, which is what is happening. Also the majority of migrants coming to Germany are not from Germany’s former colonial Empire and do not speak German. This again makes it hard to justify and adds another barrier to integration.
Really well thought out and written comment. I agree strongly. A lot of immigrants want the country they have immigrated to to adapt to their cultures, while refusing or struggling to adapt to the culture of the country itself. And that’s just not how it should work. That culture is exactly the reason the country is thriving, and your country of origin is struggling. Plus, immigrants should be grateful to their new countries. If not, why not return to your country of origin?
there aren’t enough native europeans to vote for socialist parties. thus leftists are reliant on bringing the proletariat from the 3rd world over here without open borders, socialists would lose their political dominance 😢
why do you assume birth rates can’t be changed? statistics show most women have at least one less baby than they would’ve liked. Politicians just have to implement policies ( better urban planning, subsidized childcare, pro -natal culture) to help them realized their fertility.
Africa is so rich in natural resources and could be the shining star continent if only they could manage them themselves and mitigate these corrupt companies in the first place
Transportation, transportation, transportation. Africa has geographic difficulties and a current deficit in infrastructure. Afghanistan is also resource rich but faces even worse tribalist and infrastructure problems.
@@pro-libertatibus and who are the one to blame for lack of transportation?? Themselfs only the chinese people gave a world class demonstration on how to do it they just need to follow
1. 90% of Africa has not been colonized for centuries mostly just coastal trade forts prior to the 1800s 2. Actual consequence of colonialism is spread or innovations that reduced infant mortality 3. Ghana's Gold and Congos Cobalt mostly goes to China
@@Blake84838 because the ottoman empire was closer to the federal government in the states than an actual "wipe your culture and take all your stuff" type of colony, and during ottoman reign most of the countries that were part of it had some kind of golden age 1. you say this as if it counters anything? colonialism mostly happened between the 1800 and 1950s and 90% of what? land? there wasn't even proper enough structures to control land given that information was slow moving and the wo 2. your 2nd point is also vastly inaccurate, I can only speak of the country I know well (Algeria) but post french colonialism all the medical structures and universities were left barren without knowledge or technology and it took vast amounts of aid from the USSR to be able to get back on foot (albeit not so good). Just because most of the recent medical breakthroughs happened during colonialism (which itself propelled the living standards that allowed so much spending in research to begin with) doesn't mean it's exclusive to the west. As a matter of fact a lot of the beginnings of the scientific, mathematical and medical breakthroughs had their starts in arab countries which then exported their knowledge to the west (don't forget your word for "zero" comes from arabic because it was exported). 3. Nobody said China is blameless, in fact nobody says anyone is blameless everyone has their share of blame in this global mess, why are you trying to avoid the facts as if there was any kind of conclusion made in this video? doing the ostrich and hiding your head underground is not going to help you or are you feeling guilty after watching this video and trying to shift the blame?
@@Chkoupinator 1. How do the ottomans not count as wipe your culture out in relation to the balkans even if being rather begin and not involved in Arab world 2. Well yeah when all the administrative leaves the structures tend to deteriorate and why do the soviets have to give you aid to remake these structures build them yourself that certainly didn't exist at all before France
Also what golden age did like Egypt experience under ottoman - mamluks besides insane tax rates and man power conscription to conflicts that had little to do with it
How come former colonies of European countries in Asia were able to escape neocolonialism and African countries were not? Maybe the reasons for poverty in Africa are other than neocolonialism?
The reason is hereditary racial patterns (IQ, aggression etc.) and the proof is in the pudding. Go spend some time with these people in their homelands and you will see it confirmed.
Primitive people create a primitive society. Civilized behavior is a seldom treasure and it must be learned by undeveloped societies. But they prefer being primitive, because behaving civilized is „White supremacy“, right?
Majority of Asia had the same problems. Colonialism upto 1950s and then Neo Colonialism upto 2000s. But most still manage to break out of it and carve their own destiny. But i guess that's because Asian countries had better education and leaders who cared for their people over personal wealth. Otherwise majority of South Asia, or South East Asia would be even worse off the Africa.
Africa is still a tribal place. Just like Germany and Britain after the Romans left. They still have to build up a modern, centralised culture and modern work ethnic.
Exactly my thought. I had hopes for Africa until I lived in China and saw that it takes strong leadership and someone willing to do what is right despite you cost. It will be painful at first but it will pay off in the long run and future generations will understand what needed to be done had to be done
@@Awkci_gaming Germans didn't magically become intelligent through contact with the Romans. They were not barbarians. The Germans were already intelligent, they were already advanced. The fact that you think Germans were like today's Africans is quite amusing, or sad, depending on how you look at it.
Ok, so here is what I think. Immigration to western countiries at least these days mostly come from muslim majority countries, which ones are without exception dictatorships ans that has more to do with political islam (sharia) rather than colonialism. As a result the problem that the west is facing is the same: the violent rise of political islam in the west. That is an immense danger on the whole civilised world. Non muslim migrants have little problem to integrate in western coutries and even though you mention these places as unliveable, most of these people are planning to spend their old days back in their homeland. Countries like morocco and algeria which ones have relatively stable political systems also send large amount of migrans to europe. That to me shows that the problem has more to do with european countries explicit open border policies rather than climate change or local political unrest or colonialism. Im not expert on the topic, but it seems paradoxical that oil rich arab states could exectively benefit of their natural resources than any african country especially Nigeria. The problem with immigration isnt that we have to stop it completely, but rather control it better and implement measures that integration is actually happening and deportation that supress the real threat which is radical islmamic movements.
wtf are you on about, algeria? stable political system? the algeria that I come from is nothing but stable, we have had the same "president" for 20 years despite the constitution originally only allowing 2 mandates? where MILLIONS of people went to peacefully protest in the streets to say that we did not want these corrupt politicians? The truth is the politicians in algeria do not need their people, they just need their cut of oil money and if the people are unhappy they couldn't give less of a horse shit about it also morroco is a literal monarchy, how is that a "stable political system"? in both you get sent to jail for criticizing the government... In both the job market is laughable, the average salary is at least 10 times lower than the poorest european country and political islam? dictatorship? Algeria had democratically elected an islamic party and that did not align with foreign interests so they funded extremely highly trained "terrorists" (which were in fact special forces) that would then go ahead and murder the leaders of the islamic party that they were supposed to be of. Most instances of terrorism (islamic or otherwise) comes down to some foreign faction wanting to create unrest for cheaper oil or resources and funding whichever local faction needs weapons and wants to fight, even implanting their own pawns as leaders if needed.
@@Chkoupinator I don't see how this contradicts anything I had said. I wrote: they are ALL dictatorships. The word "relatively" (stable) ment exactly that. It is, compared to Syria for example.
@@radidani1 oh so just like saying that boiling water is "relatively" cold when you compare it to molten magnesium, that's extremely useful let's all swim in boiling water. Also you just ignored literally everything else I said, your kind is the reason why I disabled notifications for replies (I got a notification for getting likes on my comment) calling countries where islamic governments got toppled to be replaced by puppets controlled by foreign states "political islam" must be one of the dumbest things I've read in this whole month
@@radidani1 oh so just like saying that boiling water is "relatively" cold when you compare it to molten magnesium, that's extremely useful maybe everyone should take a swim in boiling hot water? wtf? Also you just ignored literally everything else I said, your kind is the reason why I disabled notifications for replies (I got a notification for getting likes on my comment and made the mistake of looking at further replies) calling countries where islamic governments got toppled to be replaced by puppets controlled by foreign states "political islam" must be one of the most unintelligent things I've read this month, you deserve a medal
This guy lives in his own world built of lies. I’m Brazilian and I can assure that the colonization is not even a problem, Portugal left us a massive country, infrastructure, a political administration and even a good king (the first king of Brazil was the son of the Portuguese king). We had everything to develop the country only the nowadays politicians are obstructing our development. And by the way the US was a colony and today is the richest country in the world.
A massive number of immigrants are from South Asia, not the Middle East. They are from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh. These nations are massively overpopulated, and by ignoring them you are brushing over a major part of the issue.
Corruption, Schengen, lack of political will, desire for a cheap labor, fear of being called some flavor of bigot, and in some cases active courting for a political base (see UK Labour). All of these are fixable.
... white people have always taken things easily. you have some alternative reality and history you live in ... :D You actually think Russia would let Islam conquer EU ? If u dont know Russians dont like muslims either..... :D Russians are most orthodox christian socviety in the world.... Americans pretend to be christians, Russians actually are ...
I'd love that how about though 1 of you go down for a week in bengaldesh and Africa see why they flee to Britain like is it cause they love white people well go to there countries cause I want Britain to be for the British but how fuck can Britain be for the Brits if any 1 else can't live there own life without worrying about crushing poverty extreme inflation you westerners really piss me like people don't migrate for reasons and what is wrong with mass immigration tell me rape ? Death penalty killing LGBT death penalty stealing get your Citizenship revoked what else ? Welfare ? Cut it to almost nothing except for disabled people. Why is a larger labour force with more jobs a bad thing jobs pop left and right and laizzes faire governments is Singapore struggling for jobs ?
The real issue is Islam in Fundamentalist Islamic countries. Those who want democracy and freedom they should fight for it in their own countries and stop using past colonialism as an excuse for not using the massive ammounts of aid provided to them since the 1950's to develop their countries and create stability instead of maintaining internal corruption.
how is this what you take away from the video? colonialism isnt an excuse, its a valid thing that set dozens of coumtries decades back, ofc its important to not lean on the past and create future, COLONIALISM IS AN IMPORTNANT POART OF THIS DISCUSSION. which westerned countries have commited. And which aid have been provided? go in detail about that. you seem like a person that lacks empathy for these people. there sufferings are the reason why we prosper.
Exactly. 100% agree. Also look at most of the not-North-African nations, from where refugees & illegal immigrating people are flooding Europa! 😮Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and now the Gaza, etc. 😮 These countries are all majority Muslim nations. 🤔
as a liberal muslim I can agree like people from MENA can easily fit into society and u won't even notice who they are.Instead of that;they choose to wear garbage like hijab and making their babrbe long AF while at the same time having a toxic ideology of misogynie and homophobia.Those SOB are just waiting to be many so they can do some shitty stuff
@@RoyT64 dude here in arab countries people are leaving islam in mass.A ideological clash is coming 4 sure but liberals gonna win it easily because we believe in real human rights from equality to no slavery and prostititution and pedos those shittty things are accepted in islam
Nigeria wasn't dependent on shell because of shells legal ownership of the wells. Nigeria was dependent on shell because they didn't have the educational system to train the engineers to keep it running if shell left.
is not our fault africa is poor, they had centuries to develop before colonisation, some were never colonised and some went downhill after we left their countries, and let's not mention they turn every city/neighborhood in western countries into a hellscape maybe, just maybe, some people are just unfit for civilization btw singapore was a colony too, i wonder what's the difference...
Colonialism in Africa lasted a little more than 50 years and most colonies started gaining independence 70 years ago. Blaming colonialism is just infantile, btw Malaysia, Dubai and Singapore were also colonized. Tired of hearing these dumb arguments that deny the realities of the countries of origin.
yeah right, because during WW2 algerians didn't fight for france under the promise of it getting it's freedom when the war was done (which then subsequently mass murdered algerians that went out to celebrate the victory and it's independence) also why exactly would someone you're talking like this about fight for you to begin with?
Western colonizers created railroad systems, gave rise t to various enterprises, educated African youngsters to become leaders. Having lots of natural resources, African states had to become rich , peaceful, attractive.
Renaissance Europe in 1500 had 68 million inhabitants with a GDP per capita of 600-670$; DR Congo today has 99 million inhabitants and a GDP per capita of 1100-1600$. So it wasn't "developed". Renaissance Europe had many wars, the Italian Wars alone with over 100k dead; the current Kivu conflict in DR Congo saw 11k dead. So it wasn't "safe". Yet in the midst of this plight, Renaissance Europe had infinitely more human accomplishments, history, art, and SOVL than DR Congo could dream of, let alone aspire to (no offense). And if Europe becomes an undeveloped and unsafe place to live, I literally don't care as long as it retains the spirit, blood, and soil that made it so innovative, grandiose, and lovable.
@@hjjkk6916 He views colonialism/resource-exploitation as the monocause for the third world's underdevelopment (willfully ignoring countless examples of successful ex-colonies) and delusionally thinks mass immigration of the most criminal or welfare-seeking elements into Europe is somehow a correct or moral response. It's an oppression narrative based on Cultural Marxist ideological criteria (power, victimhood, deconstruction) with no empirical or rational foundation, yet the author reaches outlandish conclusions about reality based on this imagination, and thus these ideas belong not into political discussion but into an insane asylum.
You lost me when you said categorically that colonialism was the root of all the problems of immigration. That's just plain unintelligent to say one factor of many is responsible for all the ills. It tells that you are ignorant of history and human civilization. Please remove your ideological glasses and do a thorough analysis. The most important factors for progress/development are related to CULTURE.
You are saying that "That's just plain unintelligent to say one factor of many is responsible for all the ills. " But then you are saying that it's all "CULTURE". Your ignorance of history and facts and your comprehension is at a child's level. Sit down, shut up, and rewatch the video. Maybe you'll learn something. But I'm not holding my breath.
THIS GUY IS 100% RIGHT. Iran was one of very modern, liberal and progressive countries in the world, but since that leader denied western countries their oil, they overthrew him for a theocratic dixtatorship who the west (uk and usa in this case) thought would be easy to control. They were, but eventually they became the worst enemies of the west and established an islamic State in iran. Also, europe was NEVER even near the top in science, technology, maths, industrialisation, economy, etc. India and china were. This only changed in the last 2-3 centuries after the west colonised the rest. Karma is such a bitch isn't it ?
If it really was so Europeans would not have been able to colonize... European weapons and tactics didn't get stuck in traditions like those in Asia. Europe was very wealthy and developed before fall of Constantinople that forced Europe to seek ways to bypass the ottomans. China has innovated nothing since compass and gunpowder, as seen in their rampant IP theft.
@@Wurstklauer that's just because westerners were so focused on arming themselves to survive the cutthroat that was europe that they struck gold by optimizing gunpowder (which was already known in China and Arabic countries for centuries but never had been looked into as there was no particular need to make people explode). Also if you look at history as a whole there's always some culture or some other that strikes gold and ends up dominant... for a while
@@Chkoupinator on this we do agree but Europe may solve the problem of mass immigration yet. It's not gonna be a pretty or nice solution but it's going be a solution.
@gusfring6887 Why? The US fought against oppression. Nobody just gives you liberty, liberty is the prize of huge effort and blood. African countries don’t seem capable of liberating themselves, this is why they can’t be prosperous.
Is this the new leftist rhetoric? It’s unsolvable, it’s too late, you can’t fix it. So leave it? Nuh uh, I can appreciate that we can be blamed for this because well, who else? But to say we can’t fix it is ridiculous. Save Europa 🇪🇺
Colonialism in MENA can't be the reason. Algeria is one of the more stable nations in that area, and they had the longest and most forceful Colonial experiences. 9:47 The Ottoman State and the Barbary Pirates had far more influence than any Western Corperation. 10:58 Corruption is what causes the pain. Sure, western corperations make corruption more lucrative, but corruption preexisted the corperations. 13:52 Corperations can't become merchant princes in the West because they can't dominate the government. Russia is ruled by the Oligarchs (Putin is simply the most powerful oligarch). 20:15 America became independent in a far more hostile environment, if you're right, how did we stay anything like a democracy and develop economically? It's corruption, outsiders enhance the profits of corruption, but the roots are local.
Algeria has always been corrupt and there's a growing inflation not as bad as other MENA but it is bad enough for people to want to migrate Poeple mainly leave to Europe or usa uae because you need bribes or name drop to get a good state job living here can be hard for thr avg citizen
Until the european people dont held their governments and their companies accountable for the atrocities they do in the name of profit, the immigration crisis will never end😢
You'll most likely move to a European-diaspora-based country with the same problems, or to an East Asian country that will decline as soon as there's no whitey to do tech espionage on. I suggest standing your ground and fighting the good fight instead.
07:30 - The problem with blaming colonialism for all of Africa's woes is that this theory falls apart under even the most cursory examination. The Caribbean was also colonialized, in fact for 300 to 400 years, FAR longer than Africa. Except for Cuba and Haiti, all the countries of the Caribbean are doing very well economically and exceptionally well politically with some of the world's most vibrant democracies and freedom of speech (according to the World Press Freedom Index). If colonialism were responsible for retarding a country's progress as you claimed, then we'd expect to see wave after wave of refugees from the Caribbean, which of course we do not. As a matter of fact Caribbean countries like Trinidad & Tobago, Barbados and The Bahamas even have GDP/capita and a Human Development Index on par with European countries like Spain and so are therefore struggling with their own mass immigration/refugee problems. We see a similar situation in Asia, many of whose countries were likewise colonized by Europe. Asian countries like Hong Kong and Singapore, former British colonies, are now two of the richest and most prosperous territories in the world. Malaysia, also formerly colonized by European powers, is economically and politically very stable. I could list several more examples, but suffice it to say there's no proof that colonialism, despite its darker days, is responsible for poor economic performance and political instability in the present day, leading to mass migration. In fact, the data seems to show just the opposite. Most of the territories colonized by Europeans OUTSIDE OF AFRICA seem to be thriving economically and politically. So maybe it's not colonization by Europeans that's to be blamed, but rather something else particular to the African continent.
Southeast Asian countries were colonized too. They went to the western countries as refugees, and they assimilated themselves into the society. They have never caused any problems or damages to their respective countries they settled in, like refugees who came from Arab countries and Northern Africa. They have to show respect for the customs and traditions of their new countries.
He cannot make such a video about ex-colonies in Asia, because then his framing would be exposed. Because India and Singapore are also ex-colonies and they don't have this problem.
Bro you westerns actually attack countries and make proxy wars and funding terrorist groups. And still this is our sin that you trying to destroy our countries ??😂 😅
It is not colonialism. Stop trying to claim revenge on Europeans, you lost, period, that's never going to change, stau on the wrong side of the Mediterranean now and rebuild your country.
They just believe that if something bad happened to them then by some magick rule of universe everyone should dance around them and do everything trying to please them and sacrifices themselves fr the poor poor victim
Nobody blames anyone, he just said that no matter how hard you try, you will always drown in mass migration! Live with it and endure, do nothing! There are no solutions, and no one is to blame for this, such is the harsh life, be happy with what you have!
This won't work. The African migrants don't want to go where they can't get citizenship and bring their families. That and Gulf countries already accept refugees from Iraq, Syria, and Pakistan. They sanely don't want any more.
this always has been what we were trying to say, it's all about who controls the media at the end, the situation is tangling with time and who ever tryes to untangle it is disappearing savagely, I am a Saudi Arabian so my life here is good, but I have done many researches with my Levantine and African friends and we are just curious about it like you are cuz it's affecting us here too
Why can't this be solved? Anyone who tries to cross the borders illegally will be stopped by force. The question is also asked "why migrants (because they are not refugees) try to come to Germany or France" the answer to this is that they can receive social benefits.
As long as those poor counties do not stop to overbreed, their economy will never grow as fast as their population. Africa and Arab counties urgently need the one child policy.
"one child policy" Sounds very Gates Foundation/UN-like. As long as they stay put it's fine. We might as well return to benevolent management under European oversight.😉
Alright the muslims colonized and desrroyed the cultures in the balkans and in spain in ancient times does that mean we have to right to flood in there and take over. Actually ive been thinking of moving to turkey so maybe 😂
Anatolia was sparsely populated until the 20th century, so the Turkish government actually invited millions of ethnic minorities from the Balkans and Caucasus to move there.
@@SalehSingh33 Nah. Europe is the kid that beat up his bullies, asked his crush on a date (she said "Yes"), got a straight A on all subjects, and then went home to get high on the hallucinogenic pills from Mr. Goldstein (because he forgot God Almighty). Now there's strangers in his place, but he will kick them out once he wakes up from his drug trip, and repents.