I am a subset of Everybody and I love agile so much that I'd have signed that manifesto too if they'd have asked me. Scrum, on the other hand, I think Bart Simpson summed up Scrum quite adequately when he said "Eat my shorts".
That is similar to how "healthy nutrition", has become a debate about how many glasses of water and how many grams of vegetables one has to eat every day. Regarding of water intake, i recently heard a scientist who essentially said: it depends on the person. There is no right amount of glasses of water. Healthy nutrition is about being mindful with reagard to your eating habits. Its about finding what works for you. Not about numbers and applying a behavioural pattern. But humans like thinking in patterns, because it is easy for the brain. Thinking is hard. Applying patterns is easy.
Not scrum, waterfall with added dailies. You cannot ignore every single organisational requirement from the guide and then claim that you are doing scrum.
@@paulo2357 except it has absolutely worked, in places that actually implemented it. Do you know about the article "We've tried baseball"? We've tried baseball, without the bases, bats and balls. It sucked.
@@Venthe a great team can build great software by just simple learning and coordination, if they agree in objectives, they don't need a process. What are the parts of scrum that you suggest are missing when it fails? Are they not doing sprints, dailys, retros, planning, roles, backlog? Could be that problem is not missing rules but missing values.