WHY I DIDN'T LIKE THE SPIDER-MAN MOVIES 

I literally heard the scene in my head when he said that XD

Yeah I think in comics doc ock is more evil but I like this one is not evil but he’s mind controlled and misunderstood

Ah yes, creatine liberties

If Ock ever appeared in MTVs spider man series on the chance it gets a revival I think he would be closer to his comic counterpart imo.

I was gonna comment that.

Yeah, why not? xd.

Teehee funny.

I'm more of a Amazing spiderman than Rami fan as I got older but I felt just like that reading the title 😂😂

@@theoutsiderjess1869 ¿?

Yeah, fr

Yeah, never thought about it until this video. But original Peter almost literally could not ignore someone in need. It just wasn’t in his nature.

i think if they had removed that scene and keep the burning building scene, it would've worked well to show Peter needs to be spiderman

@@SushiPanda04 exactly

Yo

"don't"

There should've been some terrible joke after that, like how it would be in the MCU.

@CYB3R2K30 No, nothing's wrong with it. It's a sweet moment where Peter opens up about his insecurities, and MJ consoles him by encouraging Peter to just be himself. It's a neat moment of bonding between two friends that moment absolutely deserves some flowery music. My point was that anyone can make anything seem cheesy by introducing it out of context.

@@antona.8659 you're acting like these scenes weren't cringe on their own

@@keemerthanever1942 sweet teenage romance BS vs. Jokes about orgies or anuses like in Thor Schkocknarok. Guess which I'll pick.

No he’s not

@@Galvatronover yes he is

@@thebestofthebest5724 jerk doesn’t equal relatable

@@Galvatronover Relatability doesn’t equate to reality. That’s what makes Peter interesting in the books is the reality of the character

@@thebestofthebest5724 I’m not against that

Yeah. That argument seemend particularly weak to me. "I don't like that the thing that makes people unlikeable made my hero unlikeable" - well, sorry, but that's taken straight out of the comics. That's just what the symbiote does.

Man, this reply section feels so weird in hindsight

Agreed but the dialogue is far from realistic 😭

@@titan2k928 ikr

@@titan2k928 to be fair. It's coming from. A person who puts. "." In the wrong. Places.

@@titan2k928 Yeah, the dialogue is less believable than fucking Shakespeare.

Why because Vee says so?

i kinda love Homecoming for delving into the more Friendly Neighborhood aspect of Spider-Man. I agree with FFH though, i didnt like it as much/

How does Tom Holland lack storyline though it’s similar to how raimi movies were developing storyline that’s my opinion though

@@shadowstrike234 the raimi only had Peter help normal people while in homecoming he spends most of the movie pining over iron man wanting to be an avenger rather then be your friendly neighborhood spider man and he is made into a mostly incompetent buffoon

@@stempest7218 i kinda disagree with only wanting to be an Avenger and pining over Tony cuz he does defy him multiple times to go stop the Vulture.

@@shadowstrike234 he was defying tony to impress him

Heh.

That MJ segment was accurate

@@Galvatronover Yea I guess that's true

Peter allowing someone to get mugged is ass cheeks and a assassination of spider mans character. I like the raimi films but they nowhere close to being accurate to the comics.

@@cubearts1Yea that was a bit I F F Y to say the least when peter let that kid get mugged, but I never said anything about the movies being comic accurate I said that the movies feel like comic books.

Okay, I agree and I disagree. Now I'm a fan of all hero movies (except Captain Marvel and Josstice League), Comic book accurate or not, they're all mostly pretty good, except for the Spiderman trilogy. I did grow up with these movies. I loved them when I was a kid, they were my favorite movies. I was a Spiderman fan. Literally almost all of my clothes were Spiderman or just red. Anyways, although I enjoyed the movies as a kid, when I got older however, they started to not make sense. Now when I was a kid, I didn't know that most movies were based off of books. That being said, I never liked the whole spider web science in the movies. At the time I didn't know they weren't supposed to be comic book accurate, cause I never read comics, but I still didn't like it. Especially when also at the time I was watching Spiderman cartoons. My dad is kind of old, so when he was a kid, he read the first marvel comics. He told me that, in the comics, Spiderman had all his powers except the ability to make his own webs. Instead Peter Parker made Web Shooters. So looking back at the old Spiderman movies I realize that the whole web scenario is bad. And I mean bad, especially for the second movie. Now I do admit that that movie was pretty cool and entertaining, but 2/3rds of the movie is Peter Parker losing his powers over time, then starts living without powers, then try's to get his powers back. That's not a bad idea for a story, but the webs get in the way. You see, Peter lost all his powers including his webs. He's just a normal human guy. But, if he was comic book accurate with web shooters, he would've still lost his powers, but would still have the ability to shoot artificial webs. So that one guy that got mugged in the alleyway could've been saved. He could've gone after Doctor Octopus. He could've still swung around. But no, he had to have actual webs, which led to loss of webs, which led to 2/3rds of the movie being a dumb plot. And another thing, Green Goblin. He's supposed to be a goblin deformity, and yet we got a Green Iron Man. TAS2 got it a little more correct, actually a lot correct even Spiderman and Gwen Stacy. Gwen Stacy was more useful than dumbass MJ. Sandman and Doctor Octopus were the only 2 villain's I actually liked in the trilogy. But any way's, thats my take on the trilogy. I do enjoy the trilogy, but there are some major, major flaws.

😅😅

Yh man he was gonna save venom for the 4th film

Yeah he wanted to focus on Sand Man but Avi Arad forced him to including Venom because is his favorite character 🤦‍♂️

@@Omen_Rocks123 no lizard was for 4th. It was clear peters physics teacher was going to be him

@@Spongebrain97 Not Ari Aster man, Avi Arad.

@@RIME387 haha my bad. Ari Aster is actually good at his work

Yeah James franco could have been the perfect Goblin Jr I never really like the Harry Osborn in Amazing spiderman 2 even though he did okay

@@theoutsiderjess1869 Same. As mediocre as Franco's Goblin design was, I still prefer it to the TASM 2 design. At least I can look at the former without getting disgusted and wondering what the fuck Sony were thinking.

Same with sandman

@@Wortwort-Spooderbat Indeed. He and Harry should've been the villains.

Another great example of someone who captured the counterpart of a superhero alias. Smallville made me fall in love with Superman’s story and Wellings performance is a huge reason why.

That isn't why they do it, dumbass. They do it to get around labour and Sexuality laws, dumbass. Minors have more restrictions, dipshit.

@@scottchaison1001 Lol what are you on about? My comment had nothing to do with Spider-Man, and my comment was a compliment…

@Shawn Nah, don't say stupid things, there is nothing wrong with that and it looks good on Spider-Man xd.

@@nehemiahbarnes-williams Lol, excuse me, I made the wrong comment, I wanted to reply to Shawn.

*insert line from the Trilogy by a salty Raimi fanboy who's butthurt by someone's unpopular opinion*

With great Power (To Trigger Marvel Fanatics) comes with great Responsibility. 😅

Honestly ignore those guys man. Your opinion is your opinion and nothing can change that. You are finally giving everything who dislikes the rami movies a voice. Have a good one.

"That's a cute outfit. Did your husband give it to you?"

First of all you haven't "done" anything for your audience you garden gnome

I believe the saying is “to each their own”

I love raimi Spider-Man movies too

@@mcocfrog188 Both are correct and widely used.

@@RbkARI ok

Wow

Agreed

Well these movies are based off TAS and Spectacular is based of theses movies

I feel like that'd be easy, to be honest.

Wrestletalk already did a nice breakdown about why attitude era is not that good

@@bijikedelai they're idiots though

Attitude Era wasn't that great

Attitude era was the best.

And Sam Raimi kinda gets how to do an adaptation, changes are needed but you need to keep the essence of the concept and characters. Nobody wants a 1:1 CMB, maybe the closest you can get to a 1:1 adaptation, but changes sometimes are needed, like not having the big monster at the end of Watchmen and replacing it with something that has certain value and presence on the main story (that being Dr. Manhattan and his powers)

Wow I've never seen a sam rami fan say anything like this, usually they complain about the mcu spiderman and and Andrew comic inaccuracies but ignores the Rami trilogies inaccuracies, thanks for not being a hypocrite

This ☝️

@@chadcostello1407 Yeah I think that no version is going to be 100% comic accurate but it doesnt matter as long as the character on the screen embodies their comic book counterparts.

@@Spongebrain97 agreed

Im with him i dont like em either

@Dirk Platinum Me too

Both trilogies are overrated to be honest.

@@monicalewis7572 Tobey was in better films than Andrew so it's not hard to see why.

@@madddoggnogood1491 you don't like high-level capeshit filmmaking, gotcha.

You're fired!

That was a great intro, Pup.

I agree

Exactly!

They got back together

You are fucking stupid. They got back together.

Nah they got back together.

Spectacular and 90s are better interpretations overall than insomniac

@@santana8797 It's very close for me, I could probably change the order around depending on the day, but those are my definitive top 3.

@@santana8797 Eh. PS4 is a unique but accurate representation of Spider-Man, and I personally like how they made him older and more experienced also (Having been Spider-Man for a total of 8 years now). So, I can understand Insomniacs representation of the character at present. He’s prolly #2 for me, cause Spectacular Spider-Man is just…VERY HARD TO BEAT IMO.

I agree about Spectacular and Insomniac but I really don't think the 90s show holds up well at all.

@@dkamphaus43 Well, that's your opinion and I respect it, but I think it holds up very well.

Andrew Garfield took that aspect, tbh. I mean, that basketball scene is a perfect example.

Yeah, but they’re SUPPOSED to be toxic.

Very true bro

Reed Richards and Sue Storm.

Hank Pym and Janet Van Dyne

By right the point of the video is why HE doesn’t love these movies, so it was always about preference

The issue has never been about comic accuracy. The issue is Raimi-tards keep insisting that this shitshow is how Spider-Man is supposed to be. FUCKING READ A DITKO COMIC, FOR FUCK'S SAKE!!! Sorry, I got real angry there.

I haven’t watched this movie in a while can you give me ONE that he says

@@Galvatronover I'll give you a few "I Missed The Part Where That's My Problem" and "That's A Cute Outfit, Did Your Husband Give It To You?" and "Here's your Change!" "Look At Little Goblin JR.... Gonna Cry?" Here is one that is often over looked. "Uncle ben: How are you doing buddy how was the field trip. Peter: I don't feel well I'm gonna go to sleep. Aunt May: You won't have a bite? Peter: No Thanks, I had a bite."

@@OfficialSoraOkami those aren't quips though, just memed lines

Andrew Garfield’s Spider-Man had the best quip imo “oh no! you found my one weakness small knives!”

Take the fucking elephant!

To be fair, Sony is to blame for the third movie. Even then it is still pretty damn good, just not on the level of the other 2.

@@LordViperhat Its also Raimi's fault for purposely not doing Venom right because he didn't like the character.

@@virgogaming6488 He never really stated he didn't like the character. He just didn't have a place in the movie that he was being forced into by Sony. Even then Raimi did the character really well, it is literally just people whining over the fact he doesn't look like a roided gorilla.

@@LordViperhat From what I heard Sam was ignoring the fan demand for Venom after Spider-Man 2 and wanted to just use old school villains like Vulture and Sandman which Avi Arad didn't find fair since Sam had gotten to do villains he liked doing. So it is Raimi's fault in that regard.

I cannot physically hold any laughter when he says “see ya chump”

@@MerlynwestVII exactly it’s just funny

The argument about quips honestly Im tired of hearing. The whole point of Spiderman is that he is a poor kid with a good heart that struggles and gets pushed around by society but he still tries to protect it. Thats it and both Spiderman 1 and 2 portray that. Especially in 2 when the main plot line is Peter's life sucking so hard that he even quits being Spiderman

@@Spongebrain97 Exactly why spiderman 2 has yet to be topped the MCU spiderman is literally the most privileged spiderman we've seen yet. The best modern takes on spiderman are the ps4 version or spider verse.

He does quip, but not as much as the next Spider-Men and he has a dry delivery, kinda like The Naked Gun, where there's slapstick comedy and deadpan delivery of the lines

Spider-Man 3 is the best one watch out

@@dantemitsoyu977 not the best, but I don't really see that movie working as good with the themes without one of the three villains, maybe with the previous idea of gwen being the damisel in distress and some other changes to the theatrical cut, but although it's messy and far from perfect, I appreciate it as the last installment with that theme

Spider man is a little hard to mess up

The only movie that seemed to get Spider-Man right comic accurate wise is the first Amazing Spider-Man.

@@virgogaming6488 care to point me toward a comic in which Spider-Man reveals his secret identity to a girl he barely knows just to impress her, or when he breaks dead man's oath? Or where Gwen Stacy is a genius scientist Mary Sue who works at Oscorp and is smarter than Peter.

@@antona.8659 Personality wise the Garfield films were closer to Peter's character from the comics, mostly the Ultimate comics.

@@virgogaming6488 no, it wasn't. CB Peter was all about protecting his identity, not revealing it to every girl he knows, or breaking dead man's promises. And no Spider-Man has been accurate toward Ultimate Spider-Man in live-action.

I'm pretty sure some people meant literally. I still remember how when Andrew's franchise first started, he got ridicule for having webshooters, being quippy to point of seeming kind of dickish, and being too good looking. People can like one more than another or even criticize when they see the movies as lacking, but one thing I see from certain fans I don't agree with is the gatekeeping notion omthat only Tobey could be Spider-Man.

@@parkerboy795 Well, sure, there's always going to be a certain group of people with dumb arguments. Posers that pretend like they know the comics when they haven't read a single comic book in their life for instance are very prevalent. I'm more referring to the people making this argument that actually know what they're talking about. I do think my initial point also applies to the Webb films as an aside. Those films get the cosmetics right too (costume...atleast in the 2nd one, web-shooters, quips etc.), but totally flop when it comes to the important thematic stuff. The way Ben dies is stupid and makes Peter look less at fault (You don't charge a guy with a gun ffs). Peter being given his powers because he has special Parker blood completely ruins the core of thee character, that anyone could have gotten the powers, and instead makes it some weird, genetic, chosen one thing. Oscorp making all the villains also completely ruins these characters having their own personalities, origins and traits and pretty much just makes their identities gimmicks etc. The Raimi films don't get all the cosmetic stuff right, that's been beaten to death, but the important thematic stuff is on point. It's not perfect, but it's the closest to perfect we have gotten on film so far, with only Into the Spider-Verse really getting close.

@@marvelfannumber1 Fair enough, but I think each series actually does get something the other lacked. Both cosmetically and thematically.

@@parkerboy795 I don't disagree. I think the Webb films get Peter's personality and relationships more right than the others, while the MCU films nail his kind of youthful naivete and his willingness to rashly jump into situations that get him into trouble. But the main point was really that the Raimi films are the most complete package when it comes to this. There's far more thematic stuff they get right, and it's on a much wider spectrum. So if I was asked which live-action version of Spider-Man is the most comic accurate I'd respond "none of them are, but Raimi's is the closest overall".

@@marvelfannumber1 I'll admit that maybe the Raimi films are the best, but I'm not knocking any of the other Spider-Men either, even if their movies may not up to the same standards.

Same here

It's my favorite spider man show

I would probably recommend Ultimate Spider-Man

@@jennifernelson7413 no

I would be a troll and recommend amazing spiderman 2

It’s overrated

@@JohnSmith-nu4ix no

Lol of all time? What a joke.

@@randybobandy9828 it’s not the best all time but it’s up there

I personally have to say, best live action Stan alone, no crossover movie, is probably the first super man movie, is not the best, it's definitely a good one

Your comparing to a lot of original points I mean for one thing it's been retconned for pretty much ever that Ben was the one to say with great power comes great responsibility

Here's a list as many differences form the comics in Iron Man I can think of -Tony Stark in the comics was a much serious and down-to-business kind of man who disliked people who act unprofessionally or don't take things seriously. -Pepper Potts and Happy Hogan in the comics began working for Stark only after Stark returned from capture and became Iron Man. -The first woman that Stark bonded with after becoming Iron Man was Joanna Nivena, who was also the first person Stark opened up about being Iron Man, not Pepper. -Tony Stark for forty years in the comics had a secret identity, with Iron Man being perceived as his personal bodyguard. He revealed his secret identity to the world in 2004, when he saved some kid's dog that jumped on a road. -There never existed a thing such as the Arc Reactor in the comics. It was invented for the movies. Stark wore a magnetic chest-plate, which could be removed, and which he had to recharge to keep it working. -Obadiah Stane of the comics wasn’t Stark’s mentor or familiar with Stark’s father. He was roughly the same age as Stark, he appeared twenty years after Iron Man first appeared, he never worked with Stark; he took over his company, took his money, and created such a chain of events, Stark became a homeless man. He also had nothing to do with Stark’s captivity in the war zone. And his real motives were rooted in Stane’s own psychоsis and firm belief that life is a chess match where any means are necessary to win, not money. And when he put on the Iron Monger suit, his motive was not to beat Stark up, but to prove to him a point about his philosophy: that he’ll never lose. And in such Stane, after technical defeat by Stark, kіllеd himself, in such making his defeat a victory, since now he can’t answer for his crimes. -The tеrrоrist lеader Raza who was behind Stark’s capture never existed in the comics. In the comics it was a Vietcong guerrilla leader named Wong-Chu, who later on was revealed to be working for the Mandarin, who personally assigned him to capture Professor Yinsen and Stark, so they could help him better understand the power of his rings. -The Mandarin is Iron Man’s arch-nemesis in the comics, with whom Iron Man had battled since he first appeared. The Mandarin was directly involved in the capturing of Stark in the wаr zone, where he also was physically present at the time of Stark’s escape from the enemy camp, where Mandarin saw Iron Man escaping from a distance, and had the chance to kіll him, but spared his life.

-Jarvis was a real man in the comics, who worked as a butler for Stark’s family, was crucial in helping Stark get over his alcoholism, and later on went on to work as a butler at the Avengers Headquarters. -Stark met Rhodey only after he became Iron Man. Rhodey was a Vіеtnam sоldier that Stark met right after he escaped from an enemy camp. After that, they became friends, and Rhodey worked at Stark Industries as a pilot and an assistant; he was no longer in the military. Rhodey wasn’t War Machine until years later. He first took over as Iron Man after Stark went into hiding and was living as an аlcоhоlic. He then gave the suit back, after Stark went into rehab, and only years later was given the War Machine armor. Which was created by Stark, and which was first worn by Stark. -Stark in the comics did not stop his wеаpon manufacturing business after he escaped from captivity; he kept on supporting the US military. He changed his views on the military-industrial complex after he went to Vіеtnam as Iron Man, to bring troops new weapons, and had been attacked. Iron Man used the new weapon he brought, surface-to-air mіssiles, and fired back. He then met a young blind boy, whom he tried to bring back to his village, only then to find out that when he used his weapon, those missiles also hit the village of that boy, and kіllеd everyone. -Tony Stark of the comics does not like rock music, or any modern music; he likes jazz and classical. -Tony Stark in the comics is a recovering аlcоholic, who let аlcоhоlism destroy him to such an extent, he became a homeless man (as mentioned above) and formed a friendship with a homeless prеgnant woman named Gretl, who dіеd on the snowy streets of NY next to Stark while she went into lаbor. Stark saved her bаby. and that made him reconsider his life completely and forever close his gestalt with the bottle. -Stark of the comics is a no-nonsense businessman and entrepreneur who spends most of his free time, outside of superheroics, at his office. He lives and breathes business and feels great responsibility for his employees, and that’s why he’d never hand the reins of his company to somebody like Pepper Potts just because he feels so. -There are major supporting characters in the comics who never show up in the movies, like Mrs. Arbogast, who’s like Stark’s surrogate mother. Bethany Brant, who worked as Stark’s bodyguard, who was probably his biggest love interest, and was also an important figure in helping Stark get over his alcoholism during his first battle with it. -Anton Vanko in the comics was a renewed soviet scientist, who created a Russian analog of Iron Man’s armor, Crimson Dynamo suit, and was personally appointed by Хрущев to defeat him. But after learning that he was misinformed about Iron Man, and after Stark played him a recording of Хрущев talking about killing Vanko after he returns home, Vanko rejects the soviet regime, becomes Stark’s friend, and works for him. He then sacrifices himself to save Stark when the second Crimson Dynamo alongside Black Widow (who was a soviet villain when she first met Iron Man) tried to kill him. He wasn’t a drunk bum who tried to steal something from Stark’s father, and he never had a son.

-Justin Hammer of the comics was modeled after Peter Cushing, was British, and lived in hiding on a floating island, supplying various villains with his weapons, and was a central figure to Stark’s fall from grace when he became an alcoholic. He was not a pathetic American entrepreneur who envied Stark. -Tony Stark never knew a nerdy guy named Adrich Killian, and Aldrich Killian never had any conflict with Stark in Switzerland and didn’t gain superpowers. He died in a single page and his story was over. -Maya Hansen didn’t die in the Extremis story. She was apprehended by the authorities after Stark found out that it was her who sold the weapon to a group of domestic terrorists. -The physical rival of Iron Man in the Extremis story was a neo-nazi terrorist named Malen, whose objective was to kill the US president, not kidnapp him and put in an Iron Man suit. -The Extremis serum in the comics does not make people into lava. It enhances their physical abilities. -When Stark faced Malen and lost to him, almost dying, he then had to inject Extremis into himself and become superhuman, developing the ability to use technopathy. -The plot point in Iron Man 3 where Stark calls out the terrorists to come and blow up his house and then does nothing smart when it happens is very out-of-character, since a similar event occured in the comics when Stark was at his home with Pepper and Happy, then drunk Mrs. Marvel appeared clamoring for a fight with Iron Man, and Stark told his home security system to shield the house, then he put on the suit, and tried to get the fight with Carol away from his home. -Stark calls kid a рussу, which CB Stark would definitely never do, since Stark of the comics would never insult kids, and in general the kind of person to not resort to cussing. -Rhodey leaving Stark midway through the battle at the end of IM3 is as out-of-character as it can get. Please comment any other things I probably missed While I do not love the Iron Man Trilogy (it was the reason why I stopped caring about the MCU), I do see the flaws. And it's interesting how it's become this golden standard for superhero content even though it's very different from the comics

Here's a list of as many differences of the MCU Thor form the comics that I can think of -In the comics Thor was banished without a memory of his past life, in the body of a limping man named Donald Blake, who was working as a doctor. Later on he went to Norway and was attacked by Kronans. He ended up in a cave where he found a stick, which was an enchanted mjolnir that gave back Thor's powers and memory. -Thor didn’t immediately go back to Asgard after gaining his powers. He kept on double identity and was helping people as both people. -Jane Foster was a nurse, not a physicist, who worked with Donald Blake at the hospital, which is how she and Thor met. She didn’t have two annoying scientist friends who accompanied her (Selviq and Darcy were made-up for the MCU). -MCU’s Asgard lacks the famed gates from mythology and comics that shield the place from the unwanted visitors. -Jotunheim in the comics was not an icy planet; it was a place that had mountains, trees, sunlight, and animals.Jotuns weren’t just the same looking male-only NPCs who were evil. They came in different shapes and sizes (some could look like humanoid icycle, some could look like giant men with beards and hair), were a sophisticated race with its own culture, who lived a lifestyle similar to neanderthals, had their own religion, were creating families, and used handmade protection and weapons in battle. -The reason why Asgardians and Jotuns were at war with each other for thousands of years had nothing to do with Jotuns trying to invade Midgard during the Iron Age and Asgardians stopping them. In the comics the conflict began when the first giant known as Ymir, with whom Odin battled at the dawn of time, was banished (in later comics it was changed to resemble the original poem of Voluspa and Ymir was said to have been slayed to use his body as the construct for the world) to Muspelheim by Odin, hence the animosity between Jotuns and Aesir. -Much of the Asgardian pantheon of gods and history does not exist in the MCU or is not given the proper development.Vital characters like Baldr, who’s another of Thor’s brothers, and who was around since the beginning of Thor’s comics, and was also integral the conflict between Thor and Loki, and plays a big role in Ragnarok, does not exist in the MCU. Also there’s no mention of Tyr, Asgardian God of War, who’s the fourth brother of Thor. No mention in the MCU of the eldest of gods, such as Buri, the first of the Aesir, who was created after a primordial giant cow licked an icycle at the dawn of time inside which he was found. No mention of Thor’s biological mother from the comics, an earth goddess named Gaea. -The World Tree does not exist in the MCU as a literal tree that connects with its branches different realms, unlike the comics. -Odin and Thor had a hand in the development of humanity in the comics. Thor, by Odin’s command, went on a dangerous journey to bring Mimir a branch of the Yggdrasil tree to create the first two humans, Ask and Embla. In the MCU Thor did not even know of the existence of earth and humans. -Loki in the comics was at odds with Thor way before Tho’s banishment; and Thor knew that Loki’s dark at heart since they were children. Loki himself was not a likable character. He was vicious, malevolent, and if there would show some empathy from him, it would mostly be a cover up for his evil doings. He was also much stronger and vicius in the comics, and could fight Thor one-on-one. He also had love relationships with the likes of Sigyn, his wife from the mythology, and Leila, a fellow practicer of dark magic. -Sif and Thor were lovers for thousands of years, and she was always his true love, and took part in every big journey Thor went on. In the MCU such a thing is non-existent. -In the comics Asgardians survive for so long and keep their strong thanks to the golden fruits known as the Idun Apples, which were harvested by the character known as Enchantress, who is a vilified version of the Norse Goddess Idun. If Asgardians won’t eat them, they will grow weak and old very quickly. -In the comics Heimdal is Sif’s brother, and he uses his famed Gjallarhorn, a horn that can create a sound that can be heard across the universe, to alert the rest of Asgard of the approaching dangers. -Warriors Three were Thor’s brothers in arms that would always march with him into battle. They were not just in-and-out sidekicks. Their friendship and adventures with Thor were more like what was between the members of the Fellowship of the Ring. They also had lives outside of that occupation. Volstagg had a family, Fendral was a lady’s man, and Hogun was a determined warrior with a grim personality. -In the comics, like in the myths, there’s an ongoing rivalry between Asgardians and a fellow group of Norse Gods, who share the same heritage, called Vanir, which is never brought up in the movies. -The MCU does not ever focus on the famed Odinforce, an energy that gives whoever wields the reigns to Asgard an immeasurable strength. -The MCU completely forgot about the power which holds Odin’s spear known as Gungnir, which in the comics holds the named force and is capable of creating or destroying entire worlds. -One of Thor’s greatest rivals in the comics is a world-sized serpent named Jormugand, who’s an offspring of Loki, whom Thor shall battle at Ragnarok. -During Ragnarok, Loki will be one of the evil forces. Loki will be leading an army of the dead on the biggest sea ship in the universe known as Naglfar, to bring on the Ragnarok, to destroy Asgard. -Unlike the comics, MCU’s Ragnarok does not show prominent events such as: a devastating ice age tarnishing the world of asgard, famine, Loki being the bringer of Ragnarok and leading legions to battle Asgard, his offspring Jormugandr battling Thor, death of Baldr, Odin fighting alongside his sons and becoming a giant force to stop Surtur at the end, no nothing. And Hela is an observer in the comics, and she's not related to Odin. While I do not love the Thor Trilogy (except for the first movie), I do see the flaws. And it's interesting how it's become this golden standard for Thor content even though it's very different from the comics

yeah. this is just another guy that is upset that it isnt 100% the comics

Anything to make it look bad i guess.

it's one quip that doesn't change things in general

@@dailyduck1488 I think what it does, is highlights a misunderstanding of the character. Spider-Man doesn’t need to quip every two seconds to be entertaining. Spider-Man 2 only has a couple and it’s the best Spider-Man movie

@@izzik2781 no

@@dailyduck1488 if you disagree with my position, than what’s your opinion? And your reasoning for holding that opinion?

Exactly, which has always made the lack of it in the actual films all the more frustrating.

@@dkamphaus43 well tbf the characters in the movies are only as good as the writing of the lines, although sometimes the characters do well even with bad lines overall it's unfortunate he didn't get better lines and quips for Spidey

She was only weak part for the trilogy imo

Same here.

Mcu spidey ain't that bad really. Like he's actually pretty good.

@@robertrivera5569 The actor yes he fits the role, But the Iron-man over reliance I think waters down the Spider-Man side much. It feels like the suit does more of the work and is the reason why he wins, rather than his own powers or skills.

Id take sam's and webb's films over mcu's films (not saying he was terrible this kind of spiderman story isn't the most sparking to me)

@@RomanHistoryFan476AD ehh.. I guess I disagree. Tom's Spiderman has shown beneath all the fancy suit he's his own man... a Spiderman if you will. You know stuff like stopping Vulture's plane heist on his own becuase it was the right thing to do. Creating his own suit and kicking Mysterios ass all through his own know how, grit and determination; He looks the part but imo opinion has those Spiderman qualities that make him a great Spidey in his own right.

Andrew’s Peter is pretty accurate to the comics, and just because they set the standard down at mean they can be criticized.

@@niceusername303 I know it was, I just didn't really get the peter parker feeling I got with Toby or Tom

@shadonic565 Yeah it has it's flaws, Most films do, but overall I think they were great as Superhero Comicbook Movies

I actually prefer 3 over the first two. I still love all of them.

@@albertwesker2316 Spider-man 3 dose have some good things about it, but It just also has more problems about it than the others

So true

yeah he's too into the comics

The Raimi Trilogy isn't holy or perfect, especially with Spider-Man 3 being very average and one of the two Spidey films I didn't like.

Peter and MJ honestly (even when broken up) have a better relationship in the insomniac game than in the Raimi movies

Tasm 1 was good and als9 was comic accurate