Why I sold my Blackmagic 6K G2 & Sony FX30 for the Sony A7IV 

That is a very true statement! I shot with apsc 8 bit cameras for years (a6500 and a6400) both very capable cameras with beautiful image quality. The only plus side to 10 bit is if you intend on heavily color grading. I definitely recommend using what you have until you've outgrown that camera and/or your needs change, but keep in mind you can always rent gear if needed for client projects. :)

Well said.

So you’re saying gear matters because the A7IV is an amazing camera….

@@Marcus_Visbal basically, but the point is gear only matters if it maximizes what you can do in an efficient way and the A7iv does that. I’ve recently switched to an FX3 tho cos I don’t do much photo stuff anymore

Very true! I've used so many cameras over the years and honestly they all perform well. It really comes down to the artist behind the camera and what works for that person. Most cameras in recent times can accomplish a large percentage of people's needs! Thanks for watching and commenting!

🤣You have to start somewhere and the a6400 is still a very capable camera! Matter of fact, I owned one for awhile myself and really enjoyed using it. In regards to choosing the A7IV or the FX30. The A7IV would be much better as a hybrid camera for sure. Also consider what echo system you've already invested in. Do you own several Sony lenses? If so, I'd stay in that system instead of switching to Canon. Overall, I'd say choosing between the A7IV and the A7C II would be a great choice. Each camera will have slight differences. If Autofocus is top of your list then the A7C II may have a slight edge with the new AI processor, however, the A7IV still has incredible autofocus when needed.

@@GabrielJThomas Thanks! I really appreciate your answer :) Actually I haven't yet invested much in Sony (I bought additional prime lens to the kit one and that's it), so the switch wouldn't hurt. Overall I like Sony but the lack of updates to its cameras' firmware is something that worries me, as I don't want to invest in tech that will become outdated quickly. Anyway, I have something to think about and your input won't be forgotten :)

@@piotrrudnicki8064 no problem at all! Those are valid concerns and I'm sure you'll figure out what's best for you. Take care 😁

Thanks Kay, I appreciate you!

Really think about your needs and what it is you shoot the most. But you can't can't go wrong either way!

Yeah man! A lot can be accomplished with a minimalistic setup these days! 👊

@@GabrielJThomas Keep it up broskI! imma subscribe and i like to see a vid on your current setup my guy

@@tonypmedia I appreciate you! My setup may keep changing but I'll keep that video in mind for sure!

Start with a phone!

Thanks, I appreciate that! Yeah, I've been behind the camera for so long that I'm getting myself used to being in front of it. The weird part is I'm comfortable in front of camera, but I'm terrible at conveying the message I intended to convey in the first place lol. I guess it all comes with time and practice!

That's great! Work with what you have. The FX30 is a great camera!

Now I primarily use the Sony A7IV withe Sigma 24-70 F2.8 Art II and the Sigma 35mm f1.4. I always have a cage and top handle attached. When I have longer shoots I add the OSEE T7 7" monitor, Sennheiser MKE600 Shotgun mic, Small rig baseplate and 15mm rods + a V mount battery to power everything. I do have other lenses but I really wanted simplicity at this point so the 24-70 stays on most of the time. As far as specs go, I've been editing on an iMac Retina 5K, 27-inch, 2017 model and Premiere Pro for editing. Premiere Pro has its issues, but I've been using it for what feels like forever. I haven't shot a documentary or film but have worked on several sets. Currently I work full-time for a local church so most of my work is related to that. Productions, testimonials, occasional music videos, etc..However, I really want to get into commercial filmmaking and documentary work so I joined AOD.

@GabrielJThomas very cool thanks for the reply. I hope you are able to get into commercial film and documentaries soon!

@@David-kd5mf thanks, I appreciate you!

I also wish it had uncropped 4k60p. It sucks that the only way to combat that is having wider lenses to achieve a certain focal length. I almost bought the ZVE1 for its features and size, but It wouldnt have worked for many of the situations I film in. I hope you can add it to your kit for the reasons you mentioned!

@@GabrielJThomas Ah that's fair enough! For me the issue with using wider lenses is the background compression, bokeh and distortion will still be the same when cropped in, for me that's unusable especially when filming people - so it is what it is I guess

@@Chow0012 That makes sense. I guess it really does come down to what you film and the intention behind the shot!

Currently I'm using the Sigma 24-70 art (new version) to cover most of my needs. I do use the Sigma 35mm f1.4 on occasion and have a few vintage lenses, but the 24-70 pretty much lives on the camera.

Glad I can help in a small way!

@@GabrielJThomas NO, You have helped me in a HUGE way! It''s because I won't waste more than $1,000 on a set of camera and lens and then have to buy another set to film in low light.

@@mauriciolee7349 yeah, we are in an expensive profession!

I agree! And the fact you can essentially have a full frame and a super 35 in crop mode in one camera. The FX3 is amazing but its main difference is the higher 2nd base ISO of 12,800. Image quality is identical though!

@@GabrielJThomas do you think that shooting 4k 24 ISO 800 would look identical on both? In theory, A7IV should be sharper bla blah bla, but I think (haven't compared) that the highlight rolloff should be better on FX3 right?

@@Francisfphoto_ yes, I shot a wedding with the FX3 and 24-70 G master and compared it to my A7IV shots with those exact settings and they were identical. FX3 just does better in low light..outside of that, I wouldnt be able to tell the difference. Yes, the FX3 may have a few more features but not and extra 2K worth. Cant go wrong with either

@@Francisfphoto_ also, just think, you can get two used A7IV camera bodies for around the same cost as one FX3..a little perspective lol..id rather invest in good glass and lighting!

@@GabrielJThomas THANKS for this reply! Maybe, when I need to use 2 cameras, I'll get one hahahaha (or maybe a ZVE-1)