@Íbero Gallego Lol 😂 what a hypocrite. Talking about peace while being a douche. Spoken like a true liberal millenial. Let me guess, you've got hundreds if not thousands of self-obsessed selfies in your iPhone right?? And you go to Starbucks almost everyday and posting post after post of non-sense stuff on your FB/Instagram account?? And what's you're beef with white people?? I'm Asian and we are weirded out by idiots like you who have blind hate towards whites. And what? You think other races can't be racist as well?? Do you think Blacks, Hispanics, Latinos, Asians, etc. aren't racist as well?? Your blind stupidity for your SJW cause is unravelling buddy. Better get woke or go broke
...the national sovereignty of The United States is the source of your sustained freedom as with the rest of the world. If every country in the world signs on in support of ICC it becomes a de facto world government....so tell me...where is the constitution in all this...where are individual liberties...this is nothing but a star chamber at this point...The United States didn't sign on because The Constitution and the Bill of Rights would be null and void under the ICC. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land in the U.S.....the people are in control. The ICC needs to be reformed to include a Constitution and a Bill of rights and not some non-codified (needs a formal written document) lib-speak as with the EU....with out these it will become a totalitarian ruling body and is at risk of a repeat of Hitler and Stalin
@@Dcassimatis the rest of the world would be freer if usa mind its own business instead of destabilising any democratic government that wont give you cheap oil.
Perhaps the ICC could gain credibility by pursuing a greater volume of varied case law - not solely targeting cases in Africa or cases outside of its own jurisdiction - making more vocal judgments on international humanitarian law, and establishing a legitimate witness protection program.
1/3rd of all countries are muslims and they use it to bash Israeli. While muslim countries have no minority rights. I don't trust the world with justice. Look at the countries they build as exhibit A.
What part did you not understand or am I leaving out? I told you I don't trust the world to make good decisions. Therefore there should be no international criminal court.
@@MattBiden If the USA refuses to investigate and prosecute war crimes their military commit abroad themselves they should face heavy sanctions. or not be allowed to make war overseas. One country can not be permitted to commit war crimes in another country with impunity.
@@PAGANONYMOUS and let me guess, its a war crime because you disagree with the war? You do remember the USA congress and UN Voting to allow the war right? Also you statement is dumb. The only way you can stop a country from going to war overseas... Is war itself! You sound like a European leftist?
@@agedefiant-heteromundane-s6943 Blair told the court "believe" and sacrificed the lives of 10000 soldiers on street Patrol with hedcamz so they couldn't defend themselves without being prosecuted as well as having their arms and legs blown off
@@agedefiant-heteromundane-s6943 British Intelligence said Islamic extremists with bomb making capabilities & UK nationality were travelling to Afghanistan. Tony Blair ordered British soldiers to Respect their Religion
Steph Timms it doesn’t have to?? Why not just join the court but take it as a suggestion as they already do with the UN? It shows blatant complacency with war crimes and an unwillingness to get with the team.
@@theman44ful Because most countries and their laws are prone to corruption, as well as the UN and any other type of union. The US Constitution is the ultimate law for a reason; it is the best safeguard of freedom on the earth.
Right, just like it interferes with my civil rights if I get arrested for committing a crime. I'm sorry but your argument is flawed. There has to be a way of holding countries to account for breaking international law, especially in a globalized society.
Without America , Russia or China it's a paper tiger ! Africa should form it's own criminal justice system ! That would be a step forward Tanzania could be the headquarters
Well what do u expect when it doesn't have any actual power of it own? Especially when the world's major powers don't support it, it will be difficult to enforce any action.
Are US citizens not also citizens of the world? It's not a foreign court. That's like saying California shouldn't subject it's citizens to US federal court. If the world agrees that something is a objectively a crime against society, why does the US get to walk away? Regardless, it's not citizens the ICC looks that (usually), but governmental actions, and the government officials responsible for them. So it's really a check the the governments of the world have put on themselves. The founding fathers system of checks and balances was never designed for such an interconnected, global society. The ICC is just an extension of their idea of Checks and Balances on the government.
Why not? ICC is selective is chasing after the weakling country. Why would country be subjected to ICC when criminal Zionist UK monarchy are sitting finely in Buckingham? How could US, Nazi Ashkenazim Israel and Nazi Saudi who killed people with impunity and UN immunity? be not subject to court martial? The trial evils are real terrorists. So before ICC charge the small states, it must jail first the big time criminal and violators of human rights.
Any nation that decides not to agree that the ICC can investigate crimes committed by one country in another country should not be allowed to operate overseas. It's one thing for a country to decide not to allow the ICC to investigate crimes that took place only in their own country but it's quite another when a country's military takes action out side of it's own borders and refused to prosecute war crimes themselves.
Tech Tubee, well actually, if you do a little bit of research, you will see that the Yugoslavian war crimes were dealt by the ICTJ, not by the ICC. So yeah, don't go accusing people without evidence...
It’s almost like going to everyone’s house and asking if the cops can take a look around, and the cops aren’t allowed to come in if you say no, and expecting an arrest.
@@infinityz7134 Yes, American justice is AMERICAN justice. We try our own people and won't allow our soldiers of officials to be put on trial by a foreign entity for their actions in the line of duty. Over half the world's population belongs to nations that reject ICC authority. They can enforce their laws amongst their member states, but they better leave the rest of us alone unless they are able to back it up with force. Which they can't since the ICC has no military of its own.
Grammatically speaking, the International Criminal Court would make the court the criminal. It should be called the International Court of Crime. Hey, that even saves their abbreviation. You're welcome, ICC :)
The ICC would receive a lot more credence, if they prosecuted returning ISIS-members (those who originally came from European countries) in the Hague. For one thing, it would alleviate the burden on an already wrecked Iraq and Syria of having to prosecute and potentially detain for years hundreds of criminals (sure, in these parts they would execute some, but you're still left with minor collaborators, e.g. some women that emigrated to fight but were married off and turned into baby machines). For another, European national jurisdictions wouldn't have to deal with semi-stateless individuals, who have on the one hand relinquished their citizenship (making them someone else's problem), but due to the commitment to denying statehood to terrorists cannot be regarded as foreigners (international conventions rule out statelessness as an option). As I see it, the aftermath of ISIS is an international issue that's practically tailored to the cmptenecies of the ICC, if only because prosecuting an international gang of separatists is such a thankless job for any one nation to take on.
@@TheSpongion why not both at the same time. Arrest all of them especially us war criminals as they are the biggest perpetrators of this. As they are in perpetual war with another nation
That how leaders in the UK, USA and France works. Even Churchill and Eisenhower did crimes like: -Both overthrowing Iranian government in 1953 -Churchill causing famines that killed millions in India -Eisenhower involved in killing innocent people in WW2
The ICC actually failed to observed and complied to certain agreements so Duterte requested for the withdrawal of the Philippines on the Rome of Statute (ICC) and that withdrawal or recision will take place after a year - and I think this is a good idea because these organizations' built up by the UN are all propagandas and fraud💔
@@boompete4886 He's not wrong though. We are all to blame for the state of the country especially after buying into the whole EDSA scam. Since then it's been downhill eversince.
As a Chinese, it must be strongly pointed out that the trial of the United States is the United Nations International Criminal Court. The last ad hoc arbitral tribunal on the review of China’s South China Sea sovereignty was not the UN agency, and its competent authority, the Hague Arbitration Tribunal. It is a court of similar negotiation in civil commerce -- and it is funded and has no power to decide on disputes between other countries such as sovereignty. There is also the fact that the arbitration fees are supported by the Philippines. What is even more interesting is that the Philippines believes that the United States does not help pay and now refuses to pay. Your cognition comes from the paradox of American control, and there are too many fake news.
I believe I have information about the United States criminal acts. Only the FBI is unwilling to accept infor.ation. is there someone in the international criminal court interested in U.S.A criminal activities?
Philippines has massive corruption at every political level. The people elect leaders who admit to killing people or have been found guilty of murder to the highest office of power. The late Dictator Ferdinand Marcos's daughter admitted in court to having people killed when her father was in power, she's a governor in the Philippines now. The current president Duarte has waged a deadly war on drugs that has had no effect in stopping the the use of meth. So yes the Philippines left the International Court.
Any country that is offended the US has not signed on to the ICC are welcome to break off relations with us. But you might have to call Gabon, Fiji, or Andorra if you need anything in the future. No? I didn't think so.
I request all around the world international of leadership and Myanmar military day by day abuses and punished every day made genocide of the rohingya people and we're want international peacekeeping
Politics aside, I don't like the international criminal court because it's silly main building looks like an giant incomplete concrete form device and it's surrounding buildings appear to have been manufactured in the world's largest kindergarten mosaic studio.
@Jack Walters yep because Malaysia is a peaceful country & poses no threat to the world, they don't invade other nations under false pretence, they don't do genocide ect ect
DerrtyRidhey Tell that to the Chinese who have almost all left to Singapore due to widespread racism and discrimination. Malaysia is anything but peaceful.
Jack Walters lol are u Malaysian? If you dont know anything about our country . You should shut up .. of course we will protect our religion . We are the majority . Also Chinese and indian can practice about their culture .
Icc has autority to anyone like you tell to somebody or a nation to not do that or do this? How? They have no military or power to impose the law so how they do that? Nahhh... just widraw coz its just a waste of money...
I am angry that my country, Australia accepts the jurisdiction of the ICC. If any Australian citizen commits war crimes, we prosecute and punish them. Therefore the ONLY reason the ICC would want to investigate Australia would be that they are playing political games against us. This is unacceptable. I am quite happy to assist the ICC in chasing down real war criminals, but never, never to accept jurisdiction over us. This, of course, is the same reason the US refuses to get involved. In fact, if I were the American President I would propose a law to prosecute any foreign court which attempted to arrest, request extradiction of, prosecute, or punish any US citizen for alleged actions taken on behalf of the American Government.
Maybe you should petition the ICC against your own government for the inhumane treatment of Australians in the midst of this covid19 crap like the UK did. I'm American. Unfortunately I'm unable too petition the ICC on behalf of America because America does not accept the ICC as an authority.
And yet in his time, every government staff got pension. Weird a "corrupt" government can still give their staffs pensions where as a "clean" government cannot.
BECAUSE THEY DONT RECOGNISE ANY OF THE CRIMES FOR WHICH THEY WERE ESTABLISHED TO PUT ON TRIAL! THEY ARE REDUNDANT! "The Rome Statute established four core international crimes: genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. Those crimes "shall not be subject to any statute of limitations". Under the Rome Statute, the ICC can only investigate and prosecute the four core international crimes in situations where states are "unable" or "unwilling" to do so themselves"
TV ICC-watch documentary *ICC issues political verdict: Yüksekdağ’s appeal rejected* The individual appeal submitted by former HDP Co-chair Figen Yüksekdağ to the Constitutional Court (CC) has been rejected. Red. 8.8.2018 Turkey’s AKP regime controlled judiciary has issued a verdict on former HDP Co-chair Figen Yüksekdağ’s individual appeal to the Constitutional Court. The appeal had been made on the following grounds: - The capture, detention and arrest warrants issued against Yüksekdağ after the date of arrest are not lawful. - Access to the investigation casefile has been restricted, as such the rights to freedom and safety have been restricted. The accusations leading to the arrest pertain to acts of exercising freedoms of expression and political activity. - The rights to free speech and political activity have been violated as Yüksekdağ was unable to fulfill her duties as a deputy on account of her arrest. The Constitutional Court ruled that the appeal is “inadmissible”, and claimed that Yüksekdağ’s politically charged arrest is “lawful”. The CC argued that “arrest on political grounds is not possible”, and that “the arrest is warranted”. The same verdict also claimed that Yüksekdağ is “at flight risk”, and as such, “there is factual basis for the arrest regarding flight risk”. The CC said, “It is clear that there is no violation regarding the applicant’s claims that the arrest was made unlawfully, and as such that part of the appeal is clearly without merit, and the application must be ruled inadmissible.” The only CC member to object to the verdict and pose an opposing viewpoint was Engin Yıldırım. anfenglishmobile.com/news/cc-issues-political-verdict-yueksekdag-s-appeal-rejected-28801 *+* *+* TV ICC-watch documentary **Erdogan's crimes have gone unpunished for too long. International courts apparently won't do it, so it's our duty to make them do it. Let's collect as much evidence of his crimes as possible, so he can be put on trial! Join our Twitter Storm!** *+* *+* TV ICC-watch documentary
who funded them? the 100 plus idiotic members who pays membership per year. those gullible countries who wanna look good on international community. lol good thing we got out last year. what a waste of money. no one follow them anyway, every country only follows their own judicial system. why would you let someone outside you're country to decide who is guilty and not in you're country. why would you follow their ruling. that is not part of you're constitution. super lame! they can only arrest people from africa, because ever since europeans enter and do military intervention in africa at will. they always have a presence there, and africa is letting them. so they use ICC ruling to take out leader by force who don't follow their policy and propaganda. but they can't do it in countries who has full sovereign rights. states that don't allow any military, or diplomat to enter without their permission. so if they attempt to enter and investigate places like myanmar, laos, cambodia, etc. they're people would be arrested or deported immediately. totally useless. no police power. they only expect you to follow their ruling, and who would be dumb enough to follow that?
MY PEOPLE ARE UNDER ATTACK AND WHO IS COMING TO THE RESCUE FOR US LET ME TELL YOU NOBODY WERE OK.MY PEOPLE ARE VERY RESILIENT FOR THE WORLD TO BE AGAINST US SO STRONG THEY CONFIRMED IT FOR ME WE ARE THE ONE AND ONLY TRUE GODS
