Why Is The Universe Perfect? 

i love your channel, please never stop!

For the last 199,900 years constants of nature did not exist in the minds of us homosapians. Did the constants exist then? A million year explosion is occurring in the Orion nebula. Is that fine tuning? Another excellent, exciting and challenging video presentation. Thank you.

13:26 max planck? nah max plonk

Enjoying in an understatement, I'm learning. Thank you for imparting your hard earned knowledge. It really improves the way I look at my life.

There is no evidence for fine tuning in the sense that is used by scientists, why does the universe seem perfect for the evolution of life as we know it? Because life as we know it what could evolve in these conditions, it doesn't need to be anything more than a consequence of the conditions, notice I didn't say inevitable consequence just a consequence

Yeah like what is perfect. I argue nothing is it just is what it is. If it created life then great but if it didn’t then we wouldn’t be able to ask this question at all and does that mean it still wasn’t perfect? Maybe not

Also universe created the notion of some imperfections so that we could call it perfect? Where did the concept of perfection came from?

You are talking about observable insanely complex domino effect, this seems to be precodnitioned

Kind of like a puddle marveling at the perfect indentation that cradles it? Are we really as fluid as puddles? Didn't they make the opposite point in this vid?

The intelligent design argument is ridiculous, its not finetuned for life at all. Why create matter that expands into heat death with molecules forming conscious beings that struggle on the crusts of globes of other matter.

@Christopher Huxley cuz why not?

@Christopher Huxley Nobody knows, it's one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics

@@Daniel-sm5vy i read that while he said that, just so you know your comment had perfect timing

@Christopher Huxley why don't you donate $50.01? Seriously.

@Christopher Huxley because he knew you were going to put your 2 cents in.

yes I know a list of best channels on YT but they are mostly under 1m subscribers, wish yt will make sth like Netflix so we can pay to watch high quality videos or short documentary like this one in order to increase income to those channels, now its kinda free with a little of advertisement but I dont think income from youtube ads can help them invest on their big projects.

@@vhawk1951kl No, it was made for the internet. Also you realize that tv(classic cable type) is dying right? With less than half the population even having it(not even mentioning watching it), and that percentage is only decreasing with time(as the older demographics which hold a higher percentage of cable slowly die out). The internet will not die(at least not anytime soon), it will take over from the tv as the telephone did for the telegraph and email did for mailing letters. The only way the internet would be destroyed is if civilization itself completely collapsed(in which case the internet is not that big of a priority as food and shelter). While if the internet died, then modern civilization would follow it to the grave(with everything today being networked(which is objectively better in every single way)). PS, you really shouldnt use the Tower of Babel(i prefer tower of bullshit but to each his own) comparison as it doesnt really work at all(neither does lot and his city(salt of the religious as their “arguments” shatter under the great weight of logic and his brother, consistency)), actually a better religious comparison would be the cleansing of the temple(from the internet’s perspective) or judas(from cable tv’s perspective)

Then the comments be like...

@@vhawk1951kl Says the man subscribed to a huge number of YT channels on the er...so called internet. Pathetic, hypocritical creature indeed.

@@vhawk1951kl stop doing drugs pls

I'm gonna go crazy just thinking about all these things without any answers. Why so sudden? Is there really no explanations? I'm not surprised religion exists because everyone would go nuts if they constantly thought about it.

Wow, I screen shot this, it’s so touchingly written. If you mind I delete but I just couldn’t help it, it has a very exciting touch to it. =)

Unless matter is conscious.

@@whannabi or maybe it was some supreme being u can call it God as name given by humans and maybe humans just don't want that answer especially the scientists Even going by religion not abrahamic which only date back to few thousands of years but hinduism which dates back to time when humans came first the universe age is 311 trillion years and after every 311 trillion years new multiverses are created by the ultimate creator which u all call God

@@silksonic3927 mate the universe ain't even 1 trillion years old

..sorry bro, I nodded off while composing my appreciative reply!! You were sayin...?!😋

Sort of like the difference between a good professor and a great professor, I seem to remember the great story teller's and the ability to keep me in the moment

Hop off his ding-dong please. Why oh why must people *gush* their enthusiasm.

yup, the production quality is top notch.

Yeah but hes full of crap and always tries to sneak in a big lie. Like "this women was the one who invented it all" false stuff like that.

Not necessarily. We are limited in our imagination that this is needed. In any case. Each simulation needs rules and a start condition. Since the simulation also simulates time, the simulation calculation of the next nanosecond in our 'universe' can take 42 million years of our simulated time on the outside since there is a different outside 'time' but for us it seems to be one Nanosecond that has passed as this is the simulated time. That all on the quantum level is probability and works just fine unless we observe it at the micro level, there is no need to compute each elementar particle. Everything in the simulation is only as complicated as it is observed. The galaxies are only a few of points when you look at it. The simulation has only to calculate more whenever an observer looks at a small part through tools. Only that small part needs to be calculated. Like in a video game. Only what the observer looks at is finely granulated. Whatever happens in the 'world's' outside is more abstract and much easier and quicker to compute. Entanglement could be to compared to multiple pointers to one memory location. A bug? Dark matter and dark energy seems like wrong starting parameters.

theoretically there could be only a few observers be present and the rest are simulations. Like scientific results can be presented to the observer as papers without the experiments, proofs, failures. When I am at 30m distance to a tree, the image I see is rough, only when I stand directly in front of the tree, what is in my limited visual field needs to be calculated in a fine granulation. the backside, the crown are farther and don't need to be 'shown' that precise down to the subatomic level. That saves a lot of calculations.

@@gunterstrubinsky9452 Mic Drop!

@@Flyingmsdaisy not at all, what he wrote wasn't clever at all. Danny is correct that the problem is just pushed further back.

Doesn’t mean it can’t be true though

Yes

Ironically perfect

Kelvin what If I think I’m bad at math? In other words I need a good math teacher.

Ditto. I always knew I was differently wired than the other children in school while I was growing up. I found myself unchallenged and frankly bored in class, as everything was just repetitive and not enough to stimulate my mind. It wasn't until I was in high school and my teachers had all told me that I was unique and highly intelligent, that I truly understood the exponential levels beyond the other students, that my mind was capable of reaching. I would essentially daydream the majority of time about the universe and how the world around me worked. I was able to visualize things that others wouldn't even begin to be capable of comprehending, all in my mind, without having seen an example of what a black hole would look like or how particles and cells intertwine together to make everything in the observable universe. Later in highschool I had a very well versed teacher who taught science class. Chemistry to be exact. But he told me that what I was visualizing is not unlike what Einstein saw in his mind, what he referred to as "thought experiments". So this teacher of mine told me to get my IQ tested. I did and when I did they decided to test me again to make sure it wasn't a fluke. They said my IQ was in the 160 range. This was a huge ah ha moment for me as I always knew I wasn't normal. I was also later diagnosed with Asperger's, which connected even more dots for me, figuratively speaking of course. I suppose I got a bit off track there and forgot where I was going with that for a moment. The bottom line is that it takes a unique type of mind to be able to think about our spatial surroundings and to be able to comprehend nature in a micro and macro scale or quantum visualization of cells and to be able to see a massive object like a the planets. And now in this modern time of scientific breakthrough and discoveries it's so validating to know that I am seeing the world the way it truly is.

@@jessehanson6120 Not reading all that i'm sorry or good for u 💕

Yeh. I wish I could understand the language of maths, especially as it relates to astronomy and astrophysics.

@@buttercxpdraws8101 just need someone patient enough to teach you right. That's the hardest part, the rest seems trivial next to it.

@@buttercxpdraws8101 Actually I can recommend you a book on this, where mathematics is explained as an art and how it translates the Universe as a virtual language; Measurement by Paul Lockhart.

the braiin is nt the mind nor a comuter thats masonic naturalism

Everything is math first. An explanation to a question is answered through math. In all parts of the world. Universal language is math.

How did you just now found out about RU-vid? … Oh, you mean this channel? 😆

👽

I do not know how these emojis work - but your note is clearly expressed and so inspiring. Fare thee well.

And other fine spirits...

a miracle isn't it?

i recommend that chapter or any other true crime channels, they are my second option to fall asleep too

HAHA me too, I can’t sleep without these now but when I always have to rewind and figure out which part I fell asleep at for the next day!

Congratulations and good luck in your endeavors!

@@lbakicz I usually fall asleep around 11turdy 12turdy every night listening to that chapter good shit 😂

Hey congrats on your major-great career path! Good luck!

@Supreme aww boo hoo, you don't know how to read books.

Wait what!! They have another channel? Christmas came early this year.

@Supreme why are you so angry bro, just don’t watch it if you don’t want haha

@Supreme just don’t watch it then and grab a snickers bro

Evolution of geology as in how geology over time affected evolution or how the Earth's geology changed (evolved) over time? Both sound like amazing topics

You have me on a whole new concept of thinking. That reality is far more infinitely interesting than fiction. In a way, our imaginations are essentially infinite, yet the more we look at reality, it's as vast if not more. Thank you, I will be thinking on this for a long time!

what if space is absense of light. so light is your entire life that's chopped into billions of pieces. it's fed directly into your eyes using Fibonacci (golden ratio) code to produce a countdown to death, which creates space in between the light. and when the countdown gets to death, you open your eyes to new life, so you're stuck inside a virtual reality infinite loop almost like you have a oculus headset on that's feeding light into your eyes that creates time that creates age that creates death that creates life in an infinite loop forever and forever in physical world, so you need to open your mind's eye and go inwards to go onwards. maybe.

What trips me up is the Universe looks similar a brain. Super sized black holes at the center of each galaxy could be how information gets passed as a collective to the whole

@@OverRule1 I've considered that there may be a set of physics that pertains to the sub-quantum scale of the universe, and another that pertains to the super-filamental. And we cannot discern either because we exist in our layer between the two. So yeah, like black holes throughout the observable universe interact as the fundamental particles of a larger universe.

Now you're going to start to see it everywhere thanks to the bader meinhoff phenomenon

It’s crazy how you can entertain ideas on your head but not really be able to put it all together. I’m glad these RU-vid makes do it because I know it isn’t easy

Poppa Tang, please read my comments included...it may surprise you my Friend. Also, a book called, The Phoenix Fire Mystery by Silvia Cranston; all the great minds mentioned here in this video, are bearing their Souls with quotations from each one and other famous philosophers who now believe in God...

i also had this idea roughly when i was studying biochemistry in college. a few years later i found out about the cosmic fine-tuning question on the internet. i wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people around the world in the past 50-100 years have come to some part of this conclusion on their own and many eventually stumble upon the evidence for fine-tuning online now

what if space is absense of light. so light is your entire life that's chopped into billions of pieces. it's fed directly into your eyes using Fibonacci (golden ratio) code to produce a countdown to death, which creates space in between the light. and when the countdown gets to death, you open your eyes to new life, so you're stuck inside a virtual reality infinite loop almost like you have a oculus headset on that's feeding light into your eyes that creates time that creates age that creates death that creates life in an infinite loop forever and forever in physical world, so you need to open your mind's eye and go inwards to go onwards. maybe.

who created the universe?

Anton Petrov is also great

And SEA. And Cool Worlds. And Astrum.

immortality would prohibit you to experience death, and what comes after it - which is even more interesting than life itself to me

@@FordSierraIS - and which has no proof of existing

​@@jaxmc1912 how to find proof of the death

@@sunilkumaryadav2183 "how to find proof of the death" you mean proof that death exists? well, according to science, memories and experiences ate stored and processed in the brain, so once the body stops functioning correctly and giving oxygen to the brain, braincells die and at some point, which we call neurological death, the damage is irreversible and your self is gone forever. i would go as far as to say that if all your memories and experiences were deleted from your brain its the same as if you died and a new person was born (although in this case the "new person" has the same genetics and is born already your age)

Islam answered what you are looking for for me

Maybe the constants can be taken as proof of us living in a simulation clearly the values of constants had to have been chosen selectively by some intelligence for the universe we know to exist perhaps which is why the concept of god is so prevalent in our culture and we get to be the neo of this story and uncover the juicy secrets of this universe, perhaps its is time that we as humanity forget our differences and focus our energy on the research and discovery of the world we live in and embark on journey of adventure and discovery through space time as one big family Ps I know thinking like this is way beyond optimistic but its oddly humbling to type such comments 😊

VERY TRUE

Damn this comment hit me

So the univers created itself then created us to experience itself? That's not cool to think, that's not even rational at all.

@@NaKh96 lmao you're thinking about it wrong. We are made up of material from the universe, being conscious to observe the thing we are made up of is what they are saying

Exactly, and if that is the case it's not hard to figure out what life is? The meaning of life is experience. All we are is the universe trying to experience itself. By universe I also mean God. What was the point of having this magnificent universe if it couldn't experience anything. So that is where the experience of life comes from. And that also makes us part God or God is in us all. And that also makes us all one. Now if only more people would realize this, I think its a number of only 1%. All it takes is 1% of all the people in the world to realize and believe this to upgrade our concuousness to the next level. Whether this is true or not I have no clue, something I learned and I'm absolutely fascinated by it.

@@bartf656 I came to the exact same solution on my own from doing psychedelics...

we are "from" the universe

@@bartf656 Why would you say "universe" but actually mean "god" ? Those two are two different words with 2 very different definitions. We should start to pay a little bit attention to the language we all agreed on. And also, if the -point- of the universe is to experience itself then it is failing miserably. Maybe somewhere far away there are beings that are much better than us but we suck huge ass and we are SOOOOOO vastly stupid which is why we will NEVER explore anything in the universe. So if we are alone, OR if there are other stupid beings like us, the universe is failing to experience itself.

@@bartf656 lol you're not serious are you? Evolution. We are not the universe We are here for procreation Which we fail at Every generation we get worse and worse 🤷‍♂️ It's not for experience it's for procreation and we as humans fail at that. Also. Please don't talk about science if you think God is real 🤣

it's up to us to determine how and why we are here after all even if we're wrong it's the truth to us, we hold theories about quantum science as fact due to math but math is also something we came up with perhaps it means nothing even when able to prove phenomenon and what we believe to be the secrets of the universe

Hmm. I think your thoughts attempt to bring together people of varying beliefs out of respect for the person which is a good standard to live by but notably a standard which can only come from God for without God the standard is simply a preference in how to live and others may logically prefer something different- Hitler certainly did. So I think while it is important to have respect for others in a live and let live fashion we should never sacrifice the search for truth using reason bolstered with science and philosophy and the application of the truth as we understand it. Peace

Such a romantic lol 😉

We are each a PART of the universe observing a PART of the universe. Major difference. Not that the entire universe can’t observe itself, but we are not the entire universe.

way to send me into another existential crisis

So I guess you know huh? I thought I was only one of the very few who knew. But it's now rather looking like we ate no longer the "very few" but now its just the "few". Anyway which event are you talking about because I know of 4 of them that are 100% coming the only difference is when........you talking about the one coming this decade before 2030 or you talking about the one 100,000,000 years from now?

@bart can you give more info please- what 2 events are we talking about here ?

I will take the book of Ecclesiastes of Douglass whoever..

@@bartf656 da fuc

It perfectly just is

This. Reasoning is an instict/skill created by humans/evolution to survive.

Because a simulators universe is the most perfect universe to provide these simulations.

@@martinreynolds5905 Okay. But why use their perfect universe to explain our perfect universe? Occam's razor would suggest using only one such universe rather than two in order to explain complexity.

@@jasonkinzie8835 Fully agreed, glad you brough that up. It appears to be a form of circular reasoning. The same questions we ask about our universe will still apply to the "original" universe. This hypothesis belongs to the realm of ideas. Same with the multiverses, it is an idea meant to suit the fine-tuning of our universe, but we cannot observe anything outside of our universe and cannot explain the Big Bang so, all for naught. By this logic, by their logic, God is just as plausible an idea, and if anything, God IS the simplest explanation.

But that is just changing one god for another. now is a programer

Well, even though the universe where we currently reside in seems so large it isn’t endless. It had a start, it probably will end, its space probably also has a boundary (Although those are theories/ assumptions). but if we take the assumption that this universe is not entirely infinite in time and space, why shouldn’t there be a second one? Or a third? Or infinite other universes? What would be a plausible argument for that there is only one universe that started some time ago, created some space, and then vanishes into nothingness again? The only argument I ever hear is that we can only observe this universe. But is that a good argument? I cannot observe you directly, still I know (I’m assuming) that you’re existing bc you wrote a comment. I can not see other people’s thoughts or even my own but I still assume that they exist. I mean I get why some people might feel uncomfortable with this idea of “infinity” actually existing. It would mean that everything every bullshit you could imaging would exist in some random universe. It would mean there would be places with 5, 6 or even infinite dimensions. It would mean that there would be places where creatures like a Christian god exist. It would mean that there would be universes that would be just simulations in other universes. Anything would and could exist at some point in some time (or probably there would be universes with entirely different concepts then space and time, universes we couldn’t even imagine). It’s hard to wrap your head around this idea but I find it much more convincing then all the other proposals (one universe with or without god, a simulated universe inside another one)

Perspective… not everyone got so lucky, children beaten and raped daily by their own families etc As I write this millions if not billions of poor souls suffer horrifically Absolutely everything in life is personal perspective For myself I don’t think we are lucky, I lean towards Mr Hawking’s views that we are chemical scum and nothing more

@@andjusticeforall8813 OK, I was born in the 40's beat as a child in the 50's, gang violence as a teen mid 60's, went to Vietnam and had my lung shot of my chest late 60's, became a heroin addict after too much morphine in the 70's, but some how I found love, managed to have 3 beautiful daughters, 3 grandkids and lived happily ever after... so no more crying , you only have one life... live the #&@* out of it!

@@hellskitchen10036thank you for sharing

🤨📸

.....or even 1 to the power 3.....very very watchable!

It's all a theory and may not be exact ,but close

@@marcdemell5976 well, a theory in science is not the same as a theory as in "I'm theorizing something". No, the distance isnt exact to a single lightyear, but it's damn close.

@@meloney depends where in Andromeda you want to be, 2.5m exact might be the perfect location for me

@@bomt6259 well, it's not like andromeda is a million light-years across xd

In the blink of an eye 👁

I believe you may enjoy a Book written called, The Phoenix Fire Mystery by Silvia Cranston... That includes many quotations by the very same people who are mentioned in this video, to get inside the very minds of those great Physicists, as well as, evidence of the existence of our eternal Souls...👽

Looked it up, turns out that's a Douglas Adams analogy too! I knew I'd heard it somewhere before

So you stole it

Why does water act the way it does? Why does it even exist? Just what the hell is energy? What the hell is this 3 dimensional space/time bubble? Why did it even begin? Where does it sit? How big and how deep does reality really go? Wouldn't it be easier to have absolutely nothing? Why something at all? We should have never even existed yet for some reason, we do.. why? And no, not simple answers like "cause we do", or "cause quantum fluctuations" because both of those aren't what's being asked. Quantum fluctuations? Why? Just how the hell did that appear and again, why something instead of nothing? My brain gets scrambled when I think about all of this not even existing, that would mean absolutely nothing exists to the point where nothing doesn't even exist. But this does, so there is a MUCH bigger system at play here that goes far far beyond our level of comprehension. We won't know why existence exists. Like trying to comprehend colors we can't see, a lady with an additional cone cell says she sees plurple, you'll never be able to imagine it until you actually see it. Our comprehension is limited to what we can experience. If we can't experience a different reality than this one, we can never truly comprehend just how insane existence is Nor could we ever, our bodies being built by the laws in this bubble, we can't leave

Busted

@@dr.withoutthedegree3990 he used it think of analogies as tools

But in the theory of the multiverse, all the universes that are generated are independent of one another and would never collide or interact. There is no way for us to detect the existence of other universes. That’s why in this documentary he said the multiverse theory isn’t really a theory since there’s no evidence to back it up.

@@raularnela3654 Yes and fine tuning would still be needed for these universes to exist.

Entropy makes that impossible

There is no tech to achieve FTL. It isn't possible even if given another billion years, etc. Just face reality and move on.

Science is not about assumptions.

@@Idazmi7 Black Holes were only proven conclusively the past 5 years. Stephen Hawking's entire Hawking Radiation theory was based on assuming black holes exist. And many times he admitted he was wrong on aspects of black holes and made bets with other scientists he lost.

@@Idazmi7 Dark Matter is not remotely proven yet. Many scientists base their theoretical work assuming it's real. And calculate it in their theories.

@@Idazmi7 String Theory is literally based on assumptions derived from equations. None of it proven yet in experiments.

@@Idazmi7 Super Symmetry was assumed to be correct and the basis of all particle physics. But it has yet to be detected by the Large Hadron Collider and it's a major problem.

That's the anthropic principle... and it's useless. In every single scenario (necesity, inteligent design, multiverse, evolutionary cosmology etc etc) the inhabitants of that universe can "apply" it. And any "explanation" that can be applied to EVERY scenario isn't an explanation, it's a void taulology

@@TheChzoronzon can you explain that in simpler terms? Because I really don't see why the anthropic principle is useless.

@@co2_os I just told you, in the most plain terms possible... I don't know how to make it even more simple I can repeat it again, adding some emphasis: "In every single different scenario possible (1º necesity, 2º inteligent design, 3º multiverse, 4º evolutionary cosmology 5ºetc etc) the inhabitants of that universe could reason that way (insert anthropic principle here) They can use that "explanation" And any "explanation" that can be applied to EVERY scenario possible, even if all of them are completely different at the core, isn't an explanation, it's just a hollow simpleness

'Some perfect accident'? Maybe you NEED religion Nathan. If you think billions, of years, millions of suns, and perhaps only a few thousand worlds like this one in our tiny sector off the universe = then realize that in nature things happen (or don't happen) because there is never any choice, then you will be as excited as I am about the certainty of complex life throughout the universe. We may never learn about it but it doesn't need a god to make it wonderful. People can be wonderful as well. We are taking our time to learn how to behave, but I would bet my pension you can rely on your own moral intelligence to cope with a god to guide you. Am I wrong?

You state your ideas as facts. I expressed a personal idea. Ideas do not need citations but "facts" do. Therefore citations please sir.@@thecatsman

Not Clues, but Facts...If you want, Sean, read my comment up top; it may answer your questions... Thanks for helping me realize this...Cool! Very Cool!

Turtles. :-)

"All things were created through Christ and for Christ. He ·was there before anything was made [is before all things], and all things ·continue [endure; or hold together] ·because of [or in] him". 1 Colossians 1:17 Answered 2000 years ago: How things 'hold together', i.e. The Strong Force... 'a fundamental interaction of nature that acts between subatomic particles of matter. The strong force binds quarks together in clusters to make more-familiar subatomic particles, such as protons and neutrons. It also holds together the atomic nucleus and underlies interactions between all particles containing quarks.' Hawking knew nothing but what his puny mortal mind could devise, locked into it and his chair, as he was. No mind alive on earth is smarter than the Creator of all. Fools argue against God.

They don't want to believe someone is above them and more powerful, they are followers of evil, forcing the masses to believe in their own beliefs, corrupting people and making stuff up.

We would need to have the answers to the Alternate Theories of alternate Universe; where even time can be Stopped, or controlled and Space can be created, or reverse into nothing again...Imagine that! Ha! And you thought I didn't eat my Corn Flakes this Morning? ~ Ha! as well...beginning with the Big Bang beginning...What is needed to START THERE?!

@@gregdemeterband well that's why its science fiction. It's a fun theory to play mental games with though.

@@BuildingTimeFreedom "All things were created through Christ and for Christ. He ·was there before anything was made [is before all things], and all things ·continue [endure; or hold together] ·because of [or in] him". 1 Colossians 1:17 Answered 2000 years ago: How things 'hold together', i.e. The Strong Force... 'a fundamental interaction of nature that acts between subatomic particles of matter. The strong force binds quarks together in clusters to make more-familiar subatomic particles, such as protons and neutrons. It also holds together the atomic nucleus and underlies interactions between all particles containing quarks.' Hawking knew nothing but what his puny mortal mind could devise, locked into it and his chair, as he was. No mind alive on earth is smarter than the Creator of all. Fools argue against God.

@@eldin14 I'm not trying to argue against god, I'm just trying to figure out the language he (for lack of a better pronoun) left us to decipher. I'm so grateful it is such a hard problem because it will keep us busy for thousands of years, at least is has so far.

The book you are looking for is the quran