Тёмный

Why is the universe QUANTUM? What if it isn't? 

Arvin Ash
Подписаться 978 тыс.
Просмотров 181 тыс.
50% 1

Get your SPECIAL OFFER for MagellanTV here: try.magellantv.com/arvinash - It's an exclusive offer for our viewers! Start your free trial today. MagellanTV is a new kind of streaming service run by filmmakers with 3,000+ documentaries! Check out our personal recommendation and MagellanTV’s exclusive playlists: www.magellantv.com/genres/sci...
Background videos:
Quantum Field theory: • QFT: What is the unive...
Quantum mechanical model of the atom: • The Quantum Mechanical...
Chapters:
0:00 - The beginning of science
2:07 - Magellan offer
2:30 - Classical physics
3:40 - What is a black body?
4:24 - The Ultraviolet catastrophe
5:30 - Solution by Max Planck - Planck's law
7:03 - Why electrons should hit the nucleus
8:04 - The Bohr model of the atom
9:48 - A problem with Schrodinger's equation
10:30 - The Dirac equation and quantum field theory
11:51 - Is the universe Probabilistic or deterministic?
12:58 - What would a non-quantum universe look like?
Summary:
What do we think the universe is quantum? What if the universe was not quantized?
Classical mechanics was doing just fine after Isaac Newton reduced nearly all mechanical phenomena to a single powerful equation: F=MA, James Clerk Maxwell also solved the mystery of electricity and magnetism. Classical physics is continuous. This means you can always keep dividing things into smaller pieces. But scientists realized that classical physics had some major flaws because certain phenomena could not be explained, like the color of a hot glowing body.
In 1900, Lord Rayleigh and James Jeans had used experimental data to come up with a law for how all objects emit electromagnetic radiation. The problem was that according to their theory a black body will send out energy in any frequency range allowed by the temperature. But for very energetic objects at temperatures above 5000 Kelvin, their theory predicts that the object should radiate away all its energy until it reaches absolute zero. It is called the ultra-violet catastrophe.
The solution to this problem marked the end of the classical world and the beginning of the quantum world. In 1900, Max Planck had come up with an equation to explain black body radiation. He treated radiation as being quantized, released only in discrete quanta of energy. So the emission of radiation was limited to quanta of energy, proportional to a Planck's constant. E=hf, where the quanta of energy, E, is equal to the frequency f times Planck’s constant.
Another phenomenon that only quantum mechanics could explain was why an electron does not lose all its energy when orbiting a nucleus. If electrons orbit around the nucleus, then their circular motion means that they are constantly accelerating. But an accelerating electron means that it must be emitting photons, which means it must be losing energy. This would mean that the electron would continuously lose its orbital energy, and eventually hit the nucleus. So atoms could not exist.
Niels Bohr solved the problem by showing that only special orbits are allowed around the nucleus where the angular momentum of the electron is a whole number multiple of Planck’s constant over two pi. Light is only emitted or absorbed when electrons jump from one orbit to another.
Now to fully grasp our quantized world, we also need to account for special relativity. It was realized that the Schrodinger equation is wrong because it does not treat space and time equally. Paul Dirac fixed this problem by reformulating Schrodinger's equation to threat space and time equally. This became the =Dirac Equation.
His equation, and later others, do not quantizing objects, but they quantize fields. And this gave rise to quantum field theory, or QFT. In QFT, particles are treated quantizations of fields. This allows us to treat space and time equally such that it satisfies special relativity.
Another big departure from classical mechanics is the idea of probabilities. The wave function in the Schrodinger equation is related to the probability of finding the particle in a given location if you were to measure it. Prior to measurement, we cannot know in advance where it will be. So the outcome is not deterministic, but probabilistic. Only the probabilities of the alternative possible outcomes are deterministic.
#quantummechanics
#quantumuniverse
The world and the universe would be very different if it was not quantized. It would be a deterministic world where, theoretically the future would be predictable. But the world would not exist as we know it because, atoms could not form, quantum particles would not form. There would be no energy and no radiation. Without quantum mechanics, you could still have spacetime because general relativity does not require quantization. But this universe would be filled with nothing.

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

2 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 828   
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 2 года назад
Background videos for better understanding of specific subjects discussed in this video: Quantum Field theory visualization: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-jlEovwE1oHI.html Quantum mechanical model of the atom: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fP2TAw7NnVU.html
@MBBSthoughts007
@MBBSthoughts007 2 года назад
🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳
@kuwaitisnotadeployment1373
@kuwaitisnotadeployment1373 2 года назад
Cool worlds channel posted a cool video yesterday that compliments this one for anyone interested.
@LucenProject
@LucenProject 2 года назад
Is distance quantized?
@kuwaitisnotadeployment1373
@kuwaitisnotadeployment1373 2 года назад
@@LucenProject that's a interesting question...I dont know the answer. What is the smallest measurement of distance we are capable of measuring?
@berlymahn
@berlymahn 2 года назад
@@kuwaitisnotadeployment1373 plank length
@spark_y4893
@spark_y4893 2 года назад
This guy's videos are so clear to understand any complexity that we have in our universe. You work hard to make this easier for us. 👍🏻
@mn-ru4li
@mn-ru4li 2 года назад
In watch a lot of these types of channels, but Arvin Ash is the only one I wish was my friend. 💛
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 2 года назад
Thanks buddy. I AM your friend.
@kidzbop38isstraightfire92
@kidzbop38isstraightfire92 2 года назад
That's oddly how I feel lol. I watch a bunch lf these channels but Arvin seems like a guy I'd like to have a drink with and pick his brain.
@shintube
@shintube 2 года назад
Plus, he looks like imhotep from the Mummy.
@danielhathaway1498
@danielhathaway1498 2 года назад
Agreed, but also hank from scishow, michael of vsauce fame, and DEFINITELY derek of veritasium.
@kidzbop38isstraightfire92
@kidzbop38isstraightfire92 2 года назад
@@danielhathaway1498 nope, f*ck those plebs...its Arvin or GTFO
@nikivan
@nikivan 2 года назад
The best video I've ever seen on the topic. Straight to the point and easy to understand. Thank you.
@naytchh7
@naytchh7 2 года назад
"As we know, every object emits radiation." You certainly don't talk down to your audience and that's very refreshing. At 43, I only recently learned about Black Body radiation and it's still blowing my mind. Another great video Arvin!
@russiankid112233
@russiankid112233 2 года назад
“We” the scientific community. Not RU-vid lol.
@naytchh7
@naytchh7 2 года назад
@@russiankid112233Incorrect, unlike some other science presenters, Arvin doesn't dictate facts to his audience, he talks to them kindly.
@russiankid112233
@russiankid112233 2 года назад
@@naytchh7 Dictation and kindness are mutually exclusive, and saying we in reference to professionals of the field doesn't equate to dictating fact. weather that's what he meant is debatable.
@Peakfreud
@Peakfreud 2 года назад
@@russiankid112233 You're not gonna win That debate, social media is way too Emotive. I agree with you, But the purpose of a lot of comments isn't to be right, it's to be presumed right.
@AndrewJonkers
@AndrewJonkers 2 года назад
There is an underrated (IMHO) paper by Lucian Hardy "Quantum Theory from Five Reasonable Axioms" relating to this. And yes, General Relativity is also compatible with these axioms (the first axiom being the principle of relativity dressed up as "measurability") Given the body of empirical evidence summarized by QM and GR, it is almost inconceivable that a different set of axioms that are not reducible to these five might also explain this data. The conclusion (by an almost overwhelming likelihood) is that quantum theory may be incomplete but not incorrect - that is if we find a unified theory, it will also be quantum in nature. Curiously the first 4 axioms in this paper come from classical probability theory. The last, which is what makes a theory "quantum" in nature, is simply a statement of reversible continuity between any two system states.
@vitoanania6042
@vitoanania6042 2 года назад
it's just what Big Quant wants us to believe
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 2 года назад
Lol.
@ESL-O.G.
@ESL-O.G. 2 года назад
big quant 😂😂😂
@JohnnyAmerique
@JohnnyAmerique 2 года назад
I’m sure this is meant in jest, but the notion that “big science” (i.e., scientists employed in large, complex experiments like the LHC) is in it for the money is utterly ridiculous. Anyone with a Ph.D in physics could go to Wall Street or the City of London and be making a high six figure income (just to start) at any hedge fund tomorrow.
@DrDeuteron
@DrDeuteron 2 года назад
@@JohnnyAmerique yes they can.
@patsk8872
@patsk8872 2 года назад
@@JohnnyAmerique Wow I must have missed Hedge Fund Management in my many physics courses. But let me guess, physics-ists can do anything because they are smarter-er
@ryantennyson7562
@ryantennyson7562 2 года назад
Thank you. Your channel is always enlightening and the graphics are fab.
@fractalnomics
@fractalnomics 2 года назад
Very nice you put Ernest Rutherford as a pioneer of QM. He opened the door to it.
@catmate8358
@catmate8358 2 года назад
Great video Arvin, one of your best so far. Very well written and put together. Looking forward for more!
@annedrieck7316
@annedrieck7316 2 года назад
Black body radiation is racist😡😡😡
@Gamer-xb1eo
@Gamer-xb1eo 2 года назад
I really love the music at the start when the Arvin Ash logo comes up. Credits to the makers.
@nolan412
@nolan412 2 года назад
Is vapor a wave or a particle?
@BlisterHiker
@BlisterHiker 2 года назад
I was probably made with Waldorf Quantum and Behringer Neutron synthesizers ;-)
@gohancomfejao
@gohancomfejao 2 года назад
EBM is really nice to dance to
@3xAudio
@3xAudio 2 года назад
Amazing. So easy to follow on such a complex topic. Very well described and broken down.
@reeboothemad5514
@reeboothemad5514 2 года назад
I love videos like this - historical backgrounds of how we found out about things. They make it so much easier to learn and understand how we understand the universe as of today. If there were videos like these thirty years ago, I might have been much better in school.
@dahleno2014
@dahleno2014 2 года назад
The history of scientific inquiry is of the utmost importance to learning, in my opinion. While many of the greats before us are far more intelligent than us, being able to at least see what they had to work with and what they come up with is amazing. Much of science builds upon itself over time, understanding how it was built is an amazing thing. Sadly, often in high school, you’re simply taught things so you can pass a test. Now that I’m in college, understanding these building blocks really helps put these things in perspective. Especially if they’re built on quantum mechanics.
@michaelccopelandsr7120
@michaelccopelandsr7120 Год назад
Time is fascinating. I worked the subway stations for nearly 10 years. From one end of the city to the other. Every so often I would notice the city would be saying that, "Today just flew by" or "The day was just dragging along." How can an entire city complain about the same time paradox unless it was effected by it. Maybe a time distorted bubble the earth passes through in its revolution around the sun. Maybe random waves of time distortion hitting the earth? Maybe they're randomly given off by the sun. Maybe they're from outside our Terran system and reach us in intervals. ???? Ti-i-i-ime, is on my side. Yes, it is!
@radiokid2
@radiokid2 2 года назад
Arvin--you are a total treasure on the internet. Thanks!
@nathangarcia7569
@nathangarcia7569 2 года назад
Found this channel on accident and I’m so happy I found it. I’m too curious a person to not try to understand some of this and this channel helps put some of that at ease
@chrisjudd-uc7sh
@chrisjudd-uc7sh 11 месяцев назад
One of the very best explanations of where we are and how we got here. Thank you.
@AdityaChaudhary-oo7pr
@AdityaChaudhary-oo7pr 2 года назад
Best science illustrators out there
@sahelanthropusbrensis
@sahelanthropusbrensis 2 года назад
ru-vid.com
@david.thomas.108
@david.thomas.108 2 года назад
The best video I've seen on quantum mechanics in a long time!, wonderfully explained with thanks.
@harshalpurswani14
@harshalpurswani14 2 года назад
You explain v complex topics so smoothly. its just amazing, My Friend..!
@sgatea74
@sgatea74 2 года назад
Thanks Arvin ! Excellent video, I wish a lot of people would follow it to the end and understand the magic of quantum physics in our world/universe
@minimeofme
@minimeofme 2 года назад
I just want to say I appreciate your videos, most of the time it’s hard for me to retain information with other videos, but for some reason your videos I can retain it very easily
@andrewheagwood5950
@andrewheagwood5950 2 года назад
Very well explained. Thank you!
@potterma63
@potterma63 2 года назад
Very well presented. Thanks for the instruction!
@venil82
@venil82 2 года назад
this video helped me finally understand Plancks constant. Thank you!.
@johfc
@johfc 2 года назад
Arvin, this video provides an awesome brief and succinct explanation. One of your, if not the best.
@N.P.RAMESH-tx8hf
@N.P.RAMESH-tx8hf 2 года назад
Excellent Video SIr, Thank You
@n-da-bunka2650
@n-da-bunka2650 Год назад
EXCELLENT video. from 9:21 through 11:30 timestamps perfectly resolves the alignment of the Schørdinger equation with relatively with Dirac's equation bringing my understanding of how MOTION plays into these distinctions. Although I have been immersed in this world for a while, until this episode I did not realize these dependencies and interactions with time and motion which had really been bothering me. I had been simply doing the "shut up and calculate" approach. No professors had shared this aspect to clarify that Dirac's equation HAD included that balance and how that led to QFT.
@robertschlesinger1342
@robertschlesinger1342 2 года назад
Excellent video. Actually, I'd say it's a superb video, but many of your other videos are equally superb, so we have a tie with a plurality of your videos being in that superb position. Very interesting, informative and worthwhile video. A must see video for everyone. Arvin, you are enlightening the world.
@anonp2958
@anonp2958 2 года назад
His videos are great, however, enlightenment is not knowledge per se. One can not "teach" or "be taught" enlightenment. One can be told a particular definition of enlightenment but can not go to enlightenment classes.
@ellengran6814
@ellengran6814 2 года назад
We are made of this stuff...and we act both individually and collectivly.
@SnagglieFang
@SnagglieFang 2 года назад
Yay Arvin. I enjoy these videos very much!
@mxpro360
@mxpro360 2 года назад
Thank you for always sharing such fascinating things, you always have a video I look forward to watching. I hope you have a nice day, Arvin and crew :-)
@djayjp
@djayjp 2 года назад
Fun fact: it was fairly recently demonstrated that electron jumping shells is not instantaneous and takes time to occur.
@palashdey3670
@palashdey3670 2 года назад
Love your channel from Bangladesh ❤️
@alirezanabavian771
@alirezanabavian771 2 года назад
Arvin Ash is an amazing instructor. His method of presentation is first class. There are other top-notch scientists like him but his presentation skills are rivaled by no-one. I also admire professor Al-khallil as well. We are in debt of the ones who teach us .professor Ash is among the very few on earth.
@themethodroath
@themethodroath 2 года назад
he is in my top 5. Anton Petrov's channel is also amazing
@yad-thaddag
@yad-thaddag 2 года назад
@@themethodroath Yeah, that's a great channel too. Other great channels are: - PBS Spacetime - Sabine Hossenfelder - Parth G - Up and Atom - Fermilab (with Don) - Physics Girl - Veritasium - The Science Asylum And there are probably more.
@felixgabby8801
@felixgabby8801 2 года назад
@@themethodroath I find it insane how Anton Petrov hits us with a new video, based on science articles, from the latest research almost every single day of the week. I literally learn something new from that man every single day. I love him! lol This channel is awesome aswell! lol
@Posesso
@Posesso 2 года назад
Agree with everybody (I am wearing My Anton Petrov t-shirt I got two days ago :D) and just want to add ScienceClic English -> GoLd!! Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky -> Super good, MANY things
@compton2966
@compton2966 2 года назад
Since the first time I stumbled across your videos I liked and subscribed and haven’t missed any of them. You truly are a great teacher, thank you for your time and helping others to understand the most complex matters of the universe as we currently understand them.
@ketkishertukde532
@ketkishertukde532 2 года назад
Thanks fr all ur amazing knowledge U r the best youtuber ever
@Henry-jp3mc
@Henry-jp3mc 2 года назад
I'd love to watch Arvin give this lecture in Copernacus' day and see what 2021 would be like
@vergissmeinnicht8525
@vergissmeinnicht8525 2 года назад
Thank you for these amazing videos! What are your thoughts on Weyl's tile argument?
@akahassan2527
@akahassan2527 2 года назад
Absolutely amazing video! No surprise its arvin ash! Keep up ! Never stop!
@sanjayghimire7695
@sanjayghimire7695 2 года назад
Thank you ❣️ keep 'em coming
@las97531
@las97531 2 года назад
Very good explanations!
@magnushorus5670
@magnushorus5670 2 года назад
Thank you for sharing SOOO many helpful insights that alot of us wouldnt understand without having spent years studying this in depth
@Victor76661
@Victor76661 2 года назад
Amazing content, congratulations folks!!!
@alancook9102
@alancook9102 2 года назад
What a wonderful explainer you are!
@psmoyer63
@psmoyer63 2 года назад
Your narrative, logical flow and graphics are superb. That makes this video a real pleasure to watch. You mention that relativity puts space and time on the same footing, but that we can only speak of probabilities. Yet if space was quantized with each "particle" moving at C no matter one's frame of reference probabilities would disappear. Whittaker's AETHER & ELECTRICITY makes a good case for this requirement.
@nazar_von_martin
@nazar_von_martin 2 года назад
Yet another amazing video!
@nachodp9878
@nachodp9878 2 года назад
What a beautiful explanation!
@karolinat6932
@karolinat6932 2 года назад
such a great video👏🏼
@Physics__guy
@Physics__guy 2 года назад
Great video sir🙏🙏
@mastermindrational1907
@mastermindrational1907 2 года назад
This guy is a great teacher-I actually think I understand this stuff after watching this! Presentation is fantastic
@hamburgerlord9552
@hamburgerlord9552 2 года назад
Great video, as always.. 👍
@duggydo
@duggydo 2 года назад
Arvin, you explain these concepts soooo well. I wouldn't be surprised if one morning you premier a video announcing that you've developed your own Grand Unified Theory. Well done!
@carlorossi2788
@carlorossi2788 2 года назад
there is un error
@Petrov3434
@Petrov3434 2 года назад
Wow - refreshing new episodes !!
@LOGAN77000
@LOGAN77000 2 года назад
Always the best and the clearest scientist on the net ! Thanks from France 😉👍☀️
@mcwulf25
@mcwulf25 Год назад
Impossible to explain something that even top physicists can't agree on in just a few minutes. But this is the best I have seen! 👍
@vasile.effect
@vasile.effect 2 года назад
They say "think big", but Plank thinked small and got the nobel. And I mean reaaaaally small.
@bandongogogo
@bandongogogo 2 года назад
Boy you gotta love Arvin's style!!!! Go Arvin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
@TheNameOfJesus
@TheNameOfJesus 2 года назад
It's a privilege to live in a time where we understand so much but still realize we understand very little.
@SuperCarlo666
@SuperCarlo666 2 года назад
Hi Arvin, thank you for your excellent informative videos!! Would you please consider doing a video on the Zeno and anti-Zeno effects?
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 2 года назад
Good one! I put it on my list.
@Neo34014
@Neo34014 Год назад
@@ArvinAsh you never did it ~1 year from the future
@nvrp
@nvrp Год назад
Thank You!!!!🙏
@hanssacosta1990
@hanssacosta1990 2 года назад
Haven’t watched this video yet and I already know how good it is 🤩🤩🤩🤝💯❤️❤️
@hg2.
@hg2. 2 года назад
Your best video ( that I've seen). It's the best "next step" from high school physics and some of the headaches physics at that level can give you. This should be a part of high school physics. A little too much 'gee whiz' on the 2nd playing, but it's a start.
@vibaj16
@vibaj16 2 года назад
I'm currently in high school physics and chemistry. So far physics is just classical physics, but chemistry is taught by the quantum model of things
@adriancoronel4956
@adriancoronel4956 2 года назад
Congratulations, greetings from México City.
@mushtaqahmed-my9vy
@mushtaqahmed-my9vy Год назад
Excellent sir
@laika5757
@laika5757 2 года назад
Music to my ears... 🎼🎶🎸 From India.
@johnd9031
@johnd9031 2 года назад
Fascinating stuff.
@Regularsshorts
@Regularsshorts 2 года назад
GREAT VIDEO
@charlesgibson2171
@charlesgibson2171 2 года назад
Love the videos.
@VizcayaAkingProbinsya
@VizcayaAkingProbinsya 2 года назад
Top notch as always
@eatcool2852
@eatcool2852 2 года назад
Greetings from New Zealand, I love this channel. Worth getting up at midnight to watch these videos!!
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 2 года назад
Good morning my friend!
@ujjwalyadav8780
@ujjwalyadav8780 2 года назад
Lol 5 pm (evening) in india
@rectifyus7997
@rectifyus7997 2 года назад
Amazing video
@michaelccopelandsr7120
@michaelccopelandsr7120 Год назад
My idea so I get to name it! Voyager 1 is now in interstellar TIME! (Mikey's Time) Think of it like Alvin and the chipmunks. "Vyger's" message is fine. It's just sped up now that it's outside our suns time bubble or "Terran Time." It would be faster still if "Vyger" sent a message from beyond the Milky Way's time bubble. That name is still up for grabs. Outside the Local Group TIME is open, too. Now that "Vyger" is in interstellar space, it's also in the Milky Way's STANDARD, faster moving, interstellar TIME or "Mikey's Time." •Our sun's TIME bubble: "Terran Time" we know and have measured. •Milky Way's TIME bubble or "Mikey's Time." The rate/flow of TIME outside any influence but within the Milky Way: We just got there and are still figuring. Wild guess I'd say time will increase in speed, now and until Vyger is outside the Ort cloud .007-.07% faster, maybe. Just for reference. •Local Group's TIME bubble or the rate/flow of time outside of any influence but within the Local Group: Name still open and unknown. Wild guess .08% to a couple seconds faster, maybe. Used just for reference. •Outside any influence in True interstellar TIME: Name still open and unknown. ???? Here is where surfing time is SO choice. A minute is a minute in all. It's the rate/flow I'm talking about. Pass it on, please and thank you.
@NutritionistKhanCanada
@NutritionistKhanCanada 2 года назад
Unbelievablely good explanation indeed. Wow wow wow 👏 😍 👌
@surendrakverma555
@surendrakverma555 2 года назад
Very good information 🙏🙏🙏🙏
@lifeinaraindrop108
@lifeinaraindrop108 2 года назад
Waiting to see this
@ffc99
@ffc99 2 года назад
Love this guy!
@zdhanse
@zdhanse 2 года назад
The only thing cooler than your videos is your soundtrack leading up to “that’s coming right up….” Please extend it like by 2 secs
@bengoody595
@bengoody595 2 года назад
Oh, mic drop at the end of this video Arvin. Boom!!!
@9126786
@9126786 Год назад
Wow Avinash. God bless you
@MukeshKamath
@MukeshKamath 2 года назад
It encourages outsiders of physics like me to dive deeper into it every time I hear Arvin say the answer could be with someone looking at these videos. At present my thoughts on Heisenberg's UP are that its on shaky ground, concept of space needs redefinition, time for things inside refrigerator seemed like affected by lower temperatures but didn't and as discussed in other comments space-time bending due to gravity too looked circumspect. My mind sometimes thinks about a crazy thought of all points in space being located in one place only and able to communicate with each other instantaneously. May be this is BS as I am a novice in physics.
@obes8
@obes8 2 года назад
thank you
@deenial
@deenial 2 года назад
5:00 frequency does not need to be an integer, it is still continuous
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 2 года назад
Integer multiple of PLANCK's constant. Frequency, of course, can be any number.
@deenial
@deenial 2 года назад
@@ArvinAsh But Arvin, the formula is E = h*f, and f is not integer, therefore I don't understand your statement. Where is the integer?
@SpewnyBard
@SpewnyBard 2 года назад
This was cool. I'm writing a book about the idea of T-symmetry being misunderstood as a single type of symmetry, rather than two distinct and separate ones that have been lumped together by our inability to perceive their differences in a meaningful way-- and not only what happens when we can perceive them, but what happens when they get manipulated. So I love seeing stuff like this :>
@ndve8229
@ndve8229 2 года назад
That was great
@charliemeyer6475
@charliemeyer6475 2 года назад
Arvin why isn't second order time treated like second order space in equations? (I.e. t squared isn't considered a plane like x squared). Seems like time only ticks when it gets squared.
@DK-ox7ze
@DK-ox7ze 2 года назад
Great video. I had read about these concepts in school but never quite understand the meaning behind the equations, until today! I have one question though: When you say the future of the universe is non-deterministic, I understand that you are referring to the uncertainties of the quantum world. But the fact that universe largely operates in the classical realm, makes me believe that maybe the future is predictable, though ofcourse, predicting the future of universe would require a computer with infinite computing power, which isn't quite possible. But in principle, it should be possible. Now you might say that all classical phenomenon arise from quantum phenomenon, but I am not sure if that matters? Because the quantum phenomenon lasts only upto a certain scale, and the universe as a whole operates on classical physics. I mean, we could predict the big bang even though it happened billions of years ago, and I don't think any quantum physics was required for that.
@booJay
@booJay 2 года назад
I'm struggling with this as well. The whole basis of physics is to be able to predict the future and deduce the past, and we believe we can do so with stunning precision, yet quantum mechanics says we can't. Or at least we can't on the smallest scales, as you said. I guess that's why reconciling this is the biggest problem in physics.
@bernardofitzpatrick5403
@bernardofitzpatrick5403 2 года назад
Magellan sounds great! Will give it a go 🔥this was so interesting!
@darwinbarrett86
@darwinbarrett86 2 года назад
Thank you, I love this. QFT is consistent with my theory that there is only one infinite thing that always is, always was and always will be. This one infinite thing is conscious and intelligent and creates everything by natural laws, some we know and some not as yet discovered. One undiscovered law is the law of creation as applied to life. We may never know how it works, but we can see it work. The analogy of the human body gives us clues. The human has a unique relationship and function, possessing creativity and free will, communicating with the Infinite One, and choosing what it wants the Infinite One to create. Communication with the Infinite One is by true belief as expressed through emotions, thoughts and actions. Humans have tried to explain the Infinite One and in doing so created religion which missed the point, but in some ways was very close. Oh well, happy hunting. Loved your video and presentation.
@MikeCornejo
@MikeCornejo 2 года назад
Hi Ash New subscriber here. Great videos. I looked you up in Spotify and found nothing. Do you have any podcast? If you don't, you should. Keep up the good work
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 2 года назад
Thanks. Stay tuned. We are just getting started in setting up a podcast. We should have something in about a week.
@vxqr2788
@vxqr2788 2 года назад
Great video. Leaving this comment to support the channel
@CesarMaglione
@CesarMaglione 2 года назад
Arvin amazing your power of synthesis! ;)
@wulphstein
@wulphstein 2 года назад
Hi Arvin, Why wouldn't it be the case that spacetime itself is quantized into gravitons? The behavior of a graviton would reflect physics behavior. (A) A graviton would expand from a point into a sphere of radius r = speed of light * time (just like in the derivation of time dilation), (just like the expansion of the big bang). (B) A graviton is the carrier of all of the physics constants; which makes it a calibrated mechanism. (C) Wave functions are gravitons, gravitons are wave functions. By being a carrier of the physics constants, a graviton exists. If a wave function is the a graviton and a graviton is a carrier of the physics constants, then wave functions are the carriers of the physics constants, which endows them with "existence". If you know that, and you know that a quantum entanglement can be described by a wave function,then you know that a quantum entanglement is a graviton. Therefore, you can isolate a graviton as easily as you can isolate quantum entangled photons. By making these simple distinctions, you can avoid all of the theories that don't work/are not testable (superstring theory, loop quantum gravity, twistors, m theory); you can avoid all of the fairy tale theories, and you can work with the actual building blocks of spacetime. Once you know what spacetime is made of, you can start to think about a real version of the Alcubierre drive. You can think about building a real warp drive. Does anyone here want to build a warp drive?
@faditahan2930
@faditahan2930 2 года назад
Sir, you mentioned the concept of of a universe without Energy, without mass , at the end, isnt the space = energy ?
@altrag
@altrag 2 года назад
The vacuum energy is primarily a quantum effect, so it wouldn't exist in a universe without quantum mechanics. And we don't know what dark energy is so its hard to say whether that would exist either (hell we can't even say with confidence whether dark energy even exists in our own universe - it could just be a mathematic artifact of GR being incomplete). A larger sticking point though is how such a non-quantum universe would come about: How would you have a big bang with no mass or energy to go bang? The big bang (along with black holes) are the two most well-known situations where QM and GR come into conflict and tell us that one or the other (or more likely both) are not in their final forms. The idea that a universe could big bang without QM suggests that we should be able to solve the initial moments using GR alone and that does not seem to be the case.
@jlpsinde
@jlpsinde 2 года назад
Very good
@terrymiller111
@terrymiller111 2 года назад
Beautiful design by the Great Architect.
@omniversalislive9427
@omniversalislive9427 2 года назад
great sir
@msislam6751
@msislam6751 2 года назад
The main thing is that empty space time would only exist without QM.Yeah & that is proved by the scientists & beautifully explained by you.Thank u Arvin Sir
@goasthmago6354
@goasthmago6354 2 года назад
what does empty space time mean ? space time is a human inventiom, it's a geometric construct
@SteveGouldinSpain
@SteveGouldinSpain 2 года назад
I'm curious about the longevity of enegy in the microwave backround radiation. How does something so old survive this long? How does it not decay? A layman like myself could be forgiven for thinking, "well if the radiation from billions of years bumps into something it's going to be absorbed not reflected, and if it doesn't collide with anything it will be too far away by now for us to detect", so how do get that nice oval map that is always shown telling us about its distribution.
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 2 года назад
The CMB is almost everywhere in the sky, and it still has a lot of energy. This energy however, will decrease over time, but it will never theoretically disappear because the background temperature will never be absolute zero. For practical purposes though, it will become almost undetectable after about 1 trillion years.
@complex314i
@complex314i 2 года назад
It surprised me that the order mismatch between space and time was fixed by making each spacial dimension only only a first order derivative. I expected it to go the other way, with time becoming a second order partial derivative. The first thing I see when looking at the Shrodinger equation is the heat equation: U_t = k(U_xx + U_yy + U_zz) first partial in time is proportional the sum of the second partial of each spacial dimension. This is the first equation I remember working with when I took partial differential equations. The second equation that my PDifEqu course focused on after the heat equation was the wave equation: U_tt = k(U_xx + U_yy + U_zz) This looks almost identical to the heat equation except that time is a second order partial derivative just like the spacial dimensions.
@leboandrew
@leboandrew 2 года назад
If our universe at the quantum level is fundamentally probabilistic and cannot be accurately predicted, how can we explain the universe always appearing completely deterministic and predicable at the macro level? If we could know the exact initial conditions of the universe, could our future be predicted at the macro level?
@JH-en6ql
@JH-en6ql 2 года назад
Great vid! Do you think it's possible that time is quantized too?
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 2 года назад
It is possible. Mathematical manipulation of constants gives us Planck time, which is the theoretical smallest unit of time defined in quantum mechanics.
@johfc
@johfc 2 года назад
@@ArvinAsh Why not almost certain?
@thedeemon
@thedeemon 2 года назад
@@ArvinAsh Planck time has to do with frequency of light high enough to have too much energy, so it becomes a black hole. It's not the smallest unit of time in QM, time in QM is not quantized at all, there is no time operator in QM. There is position operator, momentum operator, energy operator etc. but no time operator. In both plain QM and QFT time is continuous and not quantized.
Далее
Why Does Light Exist? What is Its Purpose?
15:10
Просмотров 600 тыс.
She’s Giving Birth in Class…?
00:21
Просмотров 7 млн
Dancing makes everything better 🕺🏼
00:16
Просмотров 3,3 млн
How Entanglement Breaks The Universe
11:26
Просмотров 352 тыс.
Can Particles be Quantum Entangled Across Time?
35:19
Просмотров 179 тыс.
КАК GOOGLE УКРАЛ ANDROID?
17:44
Просмотров 73 тыс.