@@Neverpullingitout Well when 500 people use the same copy-pasted comments that have literally no grounding in reality, you have to assume that it's a computer spamming comments.
Wouldn't you rather that your warmonger government spent money on your crumbling infrastructure rather than war. I'd rather my fkn government, the UK, didn't waste billions on the US Vs Russia proxy war. Russia is slowly swallowing up Ukraine and the US is thinking 'Maybe we made a mistake here.'
@@cameronspence4977 Pretty much all I'm seeing in the comments is talk about "Russian bots". It's like some actual bots spam that stuff about "Russian bots". Makes you think...
This comment section is hillarious. Russians coping about their wunderwaffe not actually being as good as advertised. Everybody has been shitting their pants for years about these anti-air systems, and now they’re revealed to be: average. Much to the chagrin of the super patriots 😂
Are Russian bots people who disagree with you? Why not just debate them with your superior ideas? Seems like the weak route just labeling them bots. What would I know I'm just a common sense bot.
А главную клубнику не покозали как уничтожили болие 25 атакомсов, сжигают насанс и самое главное установки петриот болие 5 видео 2 сразу есть в сети 😂🎉🎉🎉, спасибо налогоплательщика твои деньги сгорели на украине с фейерверком 🎉🎉🎉
@@rebelliousfewYou have over 100+ comments just on this channel. The max people can see is 100+. You could have over 1,000 comments on this channel and I wouldn’t know. You can’t really call people butt hurt when you’re the one commenting against someone’s side and trying to argue with people on it. They’re not even angry like you’re trying to portray. they’re defending their statements with facts and evidence because you rudely comment towards them. The way you approach things doesn’t help your arguments.
@@alexz5336Really? I don’t see that many “Russian shills” I only see Ukrainian shills. You must not have very good eyesight, or you are willfully ignorant.
Russian bots have infested social media and media in general. On RU-vid they post pro-z comments, deprecate or the EU and other bots upvote it. They down vote normal real posters who challenge them and seek to try and get them banned. Several outlets are clearly Russian controlled. RU-vid is super inept at stopping this and more concerned with wokeness
@@williamzk9083 There's no Russian bot here. Just because you guys can't take the truth, doesn't make everyone Russian bot. See, your ATACMS are soo effective that for over a month they hit no target and are all shot down by S-400s. There are literally hundreds of S-400 all over the front. ATACMS barely managed to hit 3ish, till S-400 operators tuned their system.
@@aniksamiurrahman6365I have no doubt the S-400 is a modern and effective piece of equipment. Plus, it's fairly inexpensive compared to western equivalents. One of the many reasons Turkey, and I believe India, went with them. According to this video, Russia had 57 S-400 in 2020 and produces several a year. So if those numbers are just in the correct ballpark, then no they don't have 100's all across the front. Besides, not all would be stationed in or near Ukraine. They have a vast border to protect, along with key cities and infrastructure. There's always the possibility of a nation, or non state actor, taking advantage of them being preoccupied with their invasion of Ukraine. As to ATACMS. I'm pretty sure, it's less then a month ago, that Ukraine used ATACMS, to great effect in the newly occupied area of Kharkiv, along with Belgorod. I'm sure there are newer instances, that I'm just not awhere of, or don't remember. You might not be a Russian Bot, or so you say. But your claims are ridiculous, and you act like someone who's getting paid. Here you go. 10 Rubles for you. Thats the last money you'll earn from me responding. You don't have to thank me. Just stay safe buddy.
Most people have little understanding about Air Defence system and thus, easily fall for the hype of S-400 parroted by the bots. They fall for paper performance without realizing its real world implication. The S-400 became operational in 2007 and glorified for its 400 km engagement range - little do many realize that the SAM (40N6) with 380 km range didn’t become operational until very recently. They’re also unaware of the type of target(s) 40N6 is designed to engage. For nearly a decade, Russian outlets claimed 40N6 having Mach 14 speed with ‘anti-satellite’ capability - only when the missile went operational a year ago, the manufacturer’s data pointed a complete different reality - Mach 3.5 speed with smaller engagement altitude than PAC-3 MSE against ballistic missiles. And it’s designed specifically for non-maneuverable targets (AWACS, Bombers, UAVs, etc.) and not ideal for tactical Fighters. Against Fighter aircraft, S-400’s range actually shrink to a maximum of 200-250 km with 48N6E variants. This is not much different than the so-called "inferior" Patriot. For decades, outlets highlighted everytime Patriot failed, while ignoring its successes. In 4 years, Patriot in Saudi Arabia intercepted over 230 ballistic missiles - that’s more than 1 intercept every week. How many ballistic missiles or anything did S-400 intercept in last 15 years of service? Zero. People talk about Patriot’s failure in recent attack on Abqaiq oil refinery in Saudi Arabia, how it failed to intercept Iranian drones while overlooking S-400’s performance in Syria. The S-400 had been deployed in Russia’s Khmeimim air base in Syria since 2015 and that particular air base faced multiple drone attacks over last 3 years. There has been multiple failure to defend the air base against drone attacks, some resulting in Russian aircraft being damaged and personnel killed - yet the S-400 was never used to engage any UAVs despite repeated failure of point defence systems. These also highlighted serious flaws in Pantsir S1 - a system designed specifically to deal with such threats and Russian analysts reporting those flaws were forced to remove their posts. The US fielded PAC-3 with hit-to-kill warhead in 2000 as kinetic warheads are much more effective against hypersonic targets. Russia still relies on conventional fragmentation warhead and there’s no indication of it getting kinetic warhead anytime soon. At the same time people don’t look at Aegis platforms, which is the US equivalent of Strategic Air Defence system. The S-400’s pesa primary Search radar 91N6E is capable of detecting a 0.4 m2 ballistic target from 250 km. The Aegis’s now obsolete and non-AESA SPY-1D(v) reportedly “can track golf ball-sized targets at ranges in excess of 165 km.” Golf ball = 0.0025 m2. For a direct comparison, if you scale SPY-1D’s range to 0.4 m2, then it corresponds to 587 km - that’s more than twice the range of S-400 (91N6E). Unlike S-400’s overhyped 40N6, the SM-6 on Aegis with 260 km+ range can engage almost any endo-atmospheric target from sea-skimming cruise missiles, tactical aircraft to manoeuvrable ballistic missiles in their terminal stage. There’s nothing comparable to SM-3 in Russian service, the most tested exo-atmospheric interceptor with a range of 2,500 km. The Aegis BMD system have demonstrated its ability to engage targets over the horizon using targeting data coming from airborne platforms as part of Cooperative Engagement (NIFC-CA). SM-6 have engaged cruise missiles solely relying on targeting data from F-35 or E-2D. When was the last time you heard S-400 doing something like this?
^^Well said 😉 I also want to point out that Patriot was designed to fully integrate with various tactical defense platforms extending its capability substantially. In 1977 Patriot was integrated with HAWK & it has only improved since then.
A practical look at Air Defense, thanks for doing research and not just spouting off some dumb shit. I’m nowhere near an expert but holy fuck I must seem like a genius when compared with some of these Russian cope(rs) here.
Some titles seem to bring them in masses like a fishing net. I'm sure they have some system that flags videos based of title and descriptions and sends it off to the bot and troll networks to be worked.
@@leight420 You do realize that "propaganda" is SPECIFICALLY and almost EXCLUSIVELY from the top state/federal level of a country, right? One random person's channel giving his opinion on something does NOT qualify as "propaganda". I can't stand all you people who keep destroying our definition of words everywhere you go, to the point where everything is completely MEANINGLESS.
@@JohnDorian-j7xPropaganda has many channels and ways… Not saying this one in particular. I’ve been accused of being Russian when I’m from south America and do not conform to one blindly to one narrative
Excellent video, this is what I had been thinking as well with regards to how ATACMS was so effective against S-400, glad to see that my hunch matches the reality.
Actually everything is effective against S-400. It is because it is just modernized variant of S-300, what was modernized variant of S-200. Destroyed in bulk in Iraq. It was not even designed to be better, but Russia lost ability to make many parts after fall of USSR. So it is just slightly more compact modernization. It is not even clear if Russia actually based it on fake anti-Stealth warfare concept or just engineers lied, as they tend to do in Russia.
What does stealth and missiles have anything to do with each other? There's no proof that either side's technology came out ahead. People like you are basically fanboys who lack any critical thinking abilities. Did you even watch the video? We don't know but assuming it was a saturation attack, even a PAC3 would fail. Not that I doubt S-400 is exaggerated but the bottom line is, no body knows for sure.
Remember how all leftoids were yelling "PUTIN'S BOT" at the Trump supporters back in 2016? The joke is - you only have standards because you use double standards.
Why Crimea is not connected to Russia? Because it does not belong to Russia. Too many rich Russians are just loungering around Crimea, because of vacations.
Why Moldova doesn't have access to the Black Sea? Because south of the country was stolen by Ukraine. Why does the Snake island was part of Ukraine?(now under Russian control) Because was stolen from Romania and when Romania won it back at the International Court of Justice in Hague, Ukraine just answered F Off!!!
@@FinnisJaeger so Ukraine took it back so they can give it to the rightful owner Romania? With all the water surrounding the island that are rich of oil and gas?
@@andreiarama8745 This is a matter that was already decided in 2009 by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in a manner that Romania's representative described as "advantageous for Romania, fair, and also advantageous for Ukraine”.
Russia removed 105 systems from airfields that are out of range from ukraien leaving them completly undefended . (proven satelite image see last perun release fr details) apprently rumored that they lost higher number latest 5 month that russia say.
I think general the average person does not understand in war you have to expect losses in order to make gains. It is a matter of choosing how and when those losses vs gains will pay off in the long term that matters. Some comments appear as they expect one side or the other to never lose any assets and that is just not reality.
I think this video lacks the difference between S-300V and S-300P. S-400 is basically an upgraded S-300P, while S-300V was optimized against ballistic missiles.
The S400 system was approved for service in 2007. The ATACMS missile was first used in combat in 1991. Wasn’t the S400 supposed to shoot down missiles like ATACMS?
@@halliwedge Tell us all how you get the numbers of all the atacms launched and how many get intercepted? You made your view up. ergo. Your reality is fake and a small pile of wood.
The US only had 700-800 ATACMs because we haven’t been buying them for a while. The weapon that replaced the ATACMs has already arrived and is filling Army inventories as we speak. The PRSM or Precision Strike Missile. It is quite a bit more advanced than ATACMs and has a range of at least 310 miles but probably upwards of 550 miles the exact range is classified. And it can hit moving targets on land or sea. It was test fired against a decommissioned warship traveling at 20 knots and scored a direct hit. The CEP Circle area of probability is 1 meter. So draw a circle on the target 1 meter in diameter and the weapon will hit inside that circle. It’s incredibly accurate. ATACMs is at bad either it’s CEP is 3 meters especially the latest ones. But about the ATACMs we will probably wind up giving Ukraine about 80% of ours we will give them more as the PRSM is delivered or the Prism missile for short. It is a smaller missile too with the same size warhead so one HIMARS launcher can hold 2 Prisms as opposed to 1 ATACMs. But the US is not the only country that has ATACMs and I believe there is still a production line for them gone in the United States as it’s sold to allies. South Korea has a lot of them and they will probably give Ukraine some of them and some European Coumtries have it too I don’t know which ones off the top Of my head.
This is false. The US has 4000 ATACMS in their stockpiles and 500 a year are being manufactured at this very moment to fulfill an order that was placed in 2022. The US can keep giving ATACMS as long as they have funding.
Is there a new PrSM Increments 3 missile developed that increases range beyond 1000km and has a antiship capability as well as land attack. This missile should shake up the Russians.
@@rebelliousfew satirical comment in Russian ability to field advanced weapons........not a great track record. Lots of talk but really now advancement.
Here are some human questions for the channel: -how many atacms fired at S400 -What is the intercept %? -What is the opportunity cost of targeting S400? -What benefit is there for Ukr targeting S400? -What % of atacms are fired at S400 vs all other targets? -How many atacms are Ukr rx each month vs S400 production? These are pertinent questions the channel dodges because of what this channel promotes...
You people are obsessed with "Russ Bots." Are you unaware that the Ukraine project is highly unpopular in America, Asia, Africa & Europe is getting fed up. But you don't have to address that. Why talk to "Russ Bots"😂😂😂😂😂.
@@neiltitmus9744That was a Buk (SA-11 or 17) medium range missile. There's no way the DPR had an S-400 system while they were just a bunch of rebels supported by Russia, their arms were mostly just kept from the elements of the Ukrainian army who defected to the pro-Russian side, and they had lots of Buk systems.
@@DaFinkingOrk Do you really think S-400 is much different? Also Buk what take out that airliner in Donbas was model present only in Russian military. Because those Rebels were literally from Moscow. Look Girkin.
Thing about the strike vid is the S-400 didnt start firing until juat before impact and only got off three, maybe four missiles, like they disnt realize they were under attack until it was way too late.
Which is weird because a ballistic missile really isn't hard to spot and identify. I think what's happened here is S-400 isn't actually designed to hit tactical ballistic missiles, just air breathing targets. I reckon they _hoped_ it would have a secondary capability against TBMs, and that wing and a prayer got written into the sales pitch. Russia will NEVER say a weapon can't do something if you asked them.
i think its hilarious that aemrica has done barly anything milatary wise and russa is doing everything and getting barely no where. (OMG THE BOTS!) america has spend 180 to 240 billion in two years to its 24 trillion a year gdp to help ukraine, and ukraine has be able to do so well becuse of america, america is basically using less then 1% of it gdp and russia cant even compete with that, like using a finger in a arm wrestle xD
The difference is the USA has 34 Trillon of debt.. Russia has Gold and Diamond reserves. That is what this war is about but you need brains to understand
@@shueyk2320 Ok how much money do you believe the US is spending? Also 800 billion is the entire US military budget. We can't go "secret" spending 500 billion with no one noticing.
Consequences of not supporting Ukraine in defending territories: China will not respect Taiwan because the US is not respecting and supporting its ally! The US, France, the UK, China, and russia signed Budapest Agreement on December 5th,1994. The agreement was to support Ukraine's integrity against any aggressor.
Binkov himself is one big boring bot narrating like he's chewing paper and nothing changes with years. And I again and again seeing him in the recommendations
@@worldoftancraft And yet, rather than clicking the three dots>"Do not recommend channel," you clicked into the video AND left a comment. Further indicating to the YT algorithm that you'd like to see more of his stuff..
Thanks Binkov, hope you are staying well and keeping any seasonal ailments at bay. Appreciate the time and effort you put into this video even though sometimes my bias makes me want to grumble and disagree with your statements. Keep it up.
Most Western air Defense platforms are turn-key 🔑operational. Meaning that very little user input is required for them to function after they are set up. Russian platforms rely on operators to correlate tracks which introduces errors & requires skilled radar operators which can be difficult to train/find.
Because it isn’t fair. He never speaks about the failures of Ukraine, and if he does, he either downplays it or just outright denies it, even if there is evidence.
@@rebelliousfew Hilarious, so I suppose you accept his assessment that S-400 fell victim to being overwhelmed by a swarm of ATACMS, yet is shown exploding with secondary missile explosions... makes sense.
@@joetuktyyuktuk8635I never said that, so don’t go off topic like you people typically do. He has not made a single video criticizing or showing the destruction of Ukrainian equipment, let alone talk about it in detail, it’s always been Russian equipment. THAT is why he is an unfair, biased source. Learn to read next time.
@@rebelliousfew"whaaaaa its not fair! Its not fair! Boohoohoohooo I want my mommy and my blanky and my bottle, its not fair😢🥺🥺🥺🥺!" Your desperation and coping is so utterly hilarious, its insane how much fun it is when binkov uploads not bc of the video but bc of babies like you whining and crying in the comments! News flash buddy: the videos about Atacms and S400 so its perfectly fair to put only stuff about s400 and Atacms in it. Thats how basic logic works, I know that might be confusing to you but when you grow up and become an adult youll figure out how the real world works, probably 😂
Most countries now dont loke russia their economy is under heavy sanctions and the war has given nato and other powers vital information on modern warfare. Not to mention that its a stalemate when it was supposed to be quick and clean. Not to mention that the war that was meant to end nato expansionnear russia has increased it with sweden and finland joining. @rebelliousfew
ATACAMS can reach mach3, in level flight, in a dive mach5, s400 radar cant keep up with that speed.. Because U.S. have since distributed, November last year, the missile, succeeding ATACAMS, Ukraine will benefit immensely from that.
Binkov... you try and use the excuse that the S-400's fell victim to saturation attacks... yet the rare footage we do have shows secondary explosions of missiles, this shows tje system wasn't overwhelmed with targets... it just didn't respond to the attack. Isn't it more likely that the S-400 is just like other russian weapons? Over hyped and not capable of doing the job they say it is?
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ceskPbDtTzY.htmlsi=fxRxDBUkX8dt8Xxb Ryan Macbeth did a video on this already, the s400 is likely not coded to deal with threats like himars so the s400 operator will have to manually engage the threat themselves and they only have a few seconds to make a decision, he explains it it much better than I can.
Oh, you just gonna ignore the Patriot battery that got destroyed in Odessa without defending itself? Weird- it’s like you fanboys only listen to a one-sided echo chamber.
It would appear RU has a bottleneck in Active Radar missile production both SAM and AA, as the "AMRAAM-SKI" (R-77) is equally rare being observed in Russian service.
@longshanks7157 we actually have evidence to back up our fan boyism y'all literally have to make shit up. How's the 3 day special military operation going?
Ballistic missiles -- from Hitler's V-2 to ATACMS -- are very hard to shoot down. They fly faster (even the V-2 was supersonic), but don't carry as much explosives, as the slower cruise missiles.
You couldn't give a dam about Ukraine. If you actually did, you would be over there fighting, instead of sitting all comfy in your home being an arm chair warrior.
1) The assumption that any F16's will "30 or 40 year old technology" assumes the planes have not gone through the myriad of upgrade programs the F16 has had available since its inception. 2) Any F16's a S400(or the single in existence S500) ever tracks may be operating in Wild Weasel tactics e.g. draw out out the targeting radar signal to send a HARM straight down the signal back to its hosts. 3) Additionally the range difference of the different bands of radar used by the S400 requires to function also comes into play.
This is what really scares Putin. Moscow & St.Petersberg use S-400 & S-500 missile and aircraft defence sysyems. But Ukraine has been taking them out with ease. The weapons that the West have, but as yet have not given Ukraine, will either take out the Russian defense systems or will just by-pass them to their targets.
The reason they're able to target them is western eyes in the black sea. The recon drones the US is sending is giving invaluable info to Ukraine. If Russia took them out it would be impossible for Ukraine to threaten crimea.
That's correct. The Russians still owe 2 batteries to the Indians. They had until December 2023 to deliver the last 2 batteries in an order that was originally... 🤔... originally 7 or 8, I think. They've missed that deadline. I don't know if they're short on any other clients. I don't think they are, but I don't keep up with many other Countries. Not too many parties buy weapons like this, & half of those who can build their own.
Ahhh your info is so wrong, almost like you didn't bother to research this story one bit, the U.S. isn't restarting production of the atacms, atacms is a much older weapon developed decades ago, the U.S. was waiting for the new PrSM missile to go into full scale production, and since the U.S. armed forces got their first batch of PrSM missiles in December 2023, they started to replace the atacms and send them to Ukraine.
If Kamala is elected pres then the American ppl will deserve what they get but Ukrainians do not. Keep in mind Kamala wont run anything. An unelected ghost gov will make the decisions as they have during the past 3.5 years.
ATACAMS hits Mach3 in flight, an Mach5 in a Dive .. S400 cant handle that .. end of story .. No way Ukraine are gonna waste their missiles like you suggest ..
doesn't. if it was so good it wouldn't be replaced. it's an old system. proven in battle. data is open source and widely publicised and verified by independent sources. there's no secret.
