The Stone of Scone (scorn) also known as the Stone of Destiny is the stone of Theseus-Jesus-Ephesus why are you showing fake image of Herod as Theseus Theseus was the mythical king and founder-hero of Athens. HERO of Cripples, Bastards & Broken Things orphans and ex slaves
I find it fascinating how people who lived hundreds of years after Christ can believe they know the disciples and what they did/wrote. Or that they even exist for that matter.
His disciples thought the end of the world was happening in their lives.. jesus lied to them n they believed it cus only fools seemed to abandon their families n futures to go wander around begging for money
Many Christian’s were martyred despite having an easy way out of it. Some far more brutally than Jesus himself was. I hate to second guess the claim that only one true Christian existed but I am pretty damn sure that those men who were tortured in insane ways and still refused to recant their beliefs, those those people were true believers. If they aren’t true Christians then there were never any
I think Jesus's death was the most brutal imaginable, because its the condemnation and slaughter of the most loving person to live on the planet. It is the complete outpouring of evil upon the complete nature of good personified in Christ
Wouldn't it be crazy if all the cells and defense mechanisms in your body were actually highly conscious but you just cannot tell from the human brain perspective? All the wars and cycles of history going on inside even your physical body while the transcendental apperception interacts with a celestial plain outside the body?
You don't need to have any particular metaphysics in order to realize that the kingdom of God is within you. It is something that happens (if you are blessed, and we all are!) and when it happens you know. You know that everything you've pretended to be up until this point is just a mask, and that who you truly are is love, has always been loved, and will always be love. There is no need to desire and crave and grasp and all these things outside of ourselves. We have all we need within us! "The kingdom of God is within you".
Christ is a powerful meme, people will know of Christ, and see the men in their daily lives who they so greatly respect for their charisma, love and virtues. I only know one good man in my life, he raised 20+ kids to adulthood among his own kids. He was a man capable of loving someone else's kids like they where his own. But what was most impressive about him, was that he was a teacher, and a very good one at that. For during his lessons, he tamed the entire school, even the worst of the problem children would listen to his lessons. How is that? Well, respect. Kids would listen to him, because to not do so would be a very "uncool" thing to do, as he was so beloved by everyone, not listening would get you branded a heretic. Social pressure is hell a scary....
Perhaps a bit unrelated, but have you considered making a video about Nietzsche's relationship with Giacomo Leopardi? He is mentioned very frequently in Nietzsche's works, but I would still find an in-depth analysis of Nietzsche's thoughts and opinions on Leopardi's nihilism and pessimism quite interesting. Great video as always btw :)
I used to love Nietzsche. He is certainly a brilliant intellect, and a potent diagnostician of his age. He correctly identified the effect of abandoning God (Nihilism) but he had no adequate solution to the problem. We simply cannot make up our own values. I followed Nietzsche’s philosophy for about ten years until it showed me the absolute necessity for a transcendent source of values. From there it was a short step into Christ’s arms.
i dont think nietzche is right either but i see him as being right on some perspective but also christianity as a whole being not the right mindset both of them are one dimensional and lack depth only loving and having love as a basis of your belief will rob the meaning of it in every meaning theres a conflict what gives meaning to christianity is not the inherent good its the duality heaven and hell , that is god not only the bad but the good and not only the good but the bad And also as nieztche's philosophy that is to suffering not everything is hell without heaven both of them are the same because without one of them the other would lack the meaning So my philosophy is being both to be your true self
In my opinion, that’s the whole point of Nietzsche’s philosophy. He wasn’t attempting to define a single, rigid replacement for the morality of Christianity, rather he highlighted the ways in which Christianity limited human potential in the modern era. The whole point is to take that realization and encourage new ways of conquering life. The true Nietzschean is not concerned with whether or not he is right, but whether or not he opens doors for “free spirits” so that humanity can continue developing.
@@alancantu2557 if you saw nietzche he said that he favors the strong over the weak how isnt that something other than defined what he said first as his philosophy it is for people to not listen to it to begin with so it isnt a philosophy at all just a suggestion
The Stone of Scone (scorn) also known as the Stone of Destiny is the stone of Theseus-Jesus-Ephesus why are you showing fake image of Herod as Theseus Theseus was the mythical king and founder-hero of Athens. seems not to be a myth lol HERO of Cripples, Bastards & Broken Things orphans and ex slaves
It's quite convenient for Nietzsche to just deny the historicity of the Bible in order to start tearing down Jesus. Whilst I can confidently say that Nietzsche was a man of great intellect far more than me, I wholeheartedly disagree with this watered down version of Jesus who seems to be delusional and in denial of just how wicked man is, when simply whole point of Jesus dying on the cross was a because man is utterly wicked & unable to be fully Holy/Good, we might be mostly good but even in our good deeds we tend to have evil intentions & thus Jesus took upon Himself the sin & judgement that was rightfully ours & we then are credited with a righteousness that was rightfully His. This however is not much of a big deal if we were to reduce Jesus to a mere good leader who said nice things & was wrongfully charged for some crimes, He was God & perfect in all His ways and in no way was He ambushed by willfully gave up His life to suffer at the hands of His own creations, it's really an insult to compare Him with Napoleon or any human for that matter.
Knight of faith is not a tragic hero and his heroism rises above the greek idea of self sacrifing hero as it can only be understood by himself and God, e.g. Abraham sacrificing Isaac. Kierkegaard wrote on it in Fear and trembling.
Jesus was a hero, he did have a conflict. His conflict was with the force of evil(the temptation of the material world for power and glory). I think his conflict was with the very nature of the world(you could argue is inherently evil) which is why he died I think. edit: the story where satan tempts him in the desert i think is a good example
Very interesting. I’ve heard this idea of nature and the material world being evil from early gnostics and mystic Christians. My understanding of the temptations are of human condition, such as fear, lust, desire etc. rather than resisting physical reality itself
@@whosrichpurnell3328 narrative is how we configure reality in our minds top to bottom to make sense of things and react accordingly, aka survival. Survival requires narrative. narrative requires perspective. Perspective requires separation so you can distinguish you from the object of your attention because objections of attention try to kill you so you must focus. Separation inherently causes sin because your perspective neglects the totality of fact. The only person who doesn’t do that if you ask Christians is Jesus which means from birth he always knew the totality of gods heart because perfect men must have gods heart, which is a circumvention of the requirement of knowing the the totality of the facts. He never sinned, and sacrificed himself for every sinners sake. Those two things prove his divinity and godliness. The miracles were extra proof to the Christians but really those two points are the reason why, instead of the symptoms like the ability to do miracles. Everyone except God being a sinner is true because no mortal man is perfect, so only the perfect person sent from god, who must be a part of god but not the totality, who if you ask Christians is Jesus, and can respect the totality because he is part of god. He has the totality of the perspective so he surrenders knowing he can sacrifice himself for sinners, because if he didn’t sacrifice himself the only fruit of that labor is sinners waging war against sinners for sinning when both sides have sinned. He can turn the other cheek as an homage to god and let Christians, the sinners, defend themselves because self defense is a sinner activity because it’s sinners killing sinners for sinning when they both justified the force leveraged against them. The most moral sinners only sin would be defense of his family against immoral attack because of defending the elderly, women, children or suicide martyrdom in the name of awareness in the defense of others if I’m correct.
Its ironic because in Nietzsche's perspectives he gained power by conquering and overcoming this, living a life so pious and disciplined and chosing to die over compromising any of his own ideals, he was a sort of higher man, despite being kinda lowborn and his ideals beign slave, the way that he he did things shows the courage and beavery of the aristocrats of the past, and that's why he has so much significance to history, a great leader that aspired many people into his own beliefs looking down on the common romans and jews alike
@@RMadaraPlay Yep. He also does this with Socrates. Slave, but admirable. Almost like two sides constantly at war. Leaders of the weak and the strong, "villains" and "heroes" but without it's moral implications.
“A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic-on a level with the man who says he is a poached egg-or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse. You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon; or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come with any patronising nonsense about His being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.” - C.S. Lewis
Christian hypocrites? Unchristlike Christians? Thats literally the whole point of Christianity. We are incapable no matter how much we try of being perfect like the perfect man, Jesus. hence the need for a savior, mercy from God. This mercy, this saving gift is not earned but is given as a gift from God to those who are undeserving of the gift.
But life is bad. Unfair, cruel and nihilistic. That doesn't stop humans, and even some other lifeforms, from trying to make it good. And sometimes succeeding, even if for a brief moment. Jesus was one of many said people who attempted that.
Nietzsche literally proves the point that Jesus is the only one perfect and sinless. The actions of the early Christians don’t match the words in the bible, so therefore you cannot say the words were changed to fit their narrative.
That is rather PRESUMPTUOUS of you, wouldn’t you agree, Slave? Presumption is evil, because when one is PRESUMPTUOUS, one makes a judgement about a matter, despite having insufficient facts to support one’s position.
Nietzsche does not “literally prove” that Jesus was perfect or sinless. If you honestly think he does, then you are doing some Olympic-level mental gymnastics with Nietzsche’s words.
Jesus literally was sinless and died for our sins rose again and defeated death sin and the devil. Ultimate Hero of Eternity. who cares what some satanic deviI thinks? hes in Hell now same with Op and most of u soon.
"And Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” And they cast lots to divide his garments." -Luke 23:24 I always pray for this dark corner of RU-vid, you people who search for eloquent psychological or philosophical explanations for the solemnity and meaninglessness within you. Christ is the narrow path and few find it. Please dont die blind guys. Instead of strawmanning Christianity, search the depths of its truths earnestly for once.
I agree with the observation of "ressentiment" A French word for to re-live ones experience. Similar to modern trauma theory. To live and act without regret is how we could summarize many paths, being guided by one's principle, and in service to the I and the other.
Matthew 22:29 "“You are in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God." Nietzsche was a prisoner of this world. He thought heroism was to conquer the other, as Napoleon did, not conquer oneself, as Jesus did. In fact Jesus is the ultimate hero, the God who sheds His own divinity, taking the appearance of a suffering servant and in this act of serving all, becomes exalted above all. Jesus never gave up on His expectations to be worshipped, He just gave us a very, very good reason to do so in love.
can you make a video about nietzsche and his relation to the modern left through foucoult and derrida, i think it would be interesting but i couldnt find any info. love your work
Postmodernists and Marxists entire belief system is the epitome of resentment. Foucault's own life was the essence of decadence, lacking strength, vigour, honour and dying, as he did, of HIV contracted in a bath-house.
Christ was a hero, he was forsaken and Christians always say God's not literal whenever Jesus failed hence a second coming tho they also defend what he himself says about failing
Jesus Christ is real and Nietzsche was wise but was world wise and not spirit wise that's why he doesn't understand who Jesus of Nazareth is. Jesus Christ is the king of the universe, he is the universe and he is the only eternal king .
@@MrPhone-ks8zy 🔽 Gittin 57a:3-4 “Onkelos then went and raised Jesus the Nazarene from the grave through necromancy… What is the punishment of that man, a euphemism for Jesus himself, in the next world? Jesus said to him: He is punished with boiling excrement.” ................. Sanhedrin 43a:20 “On Passover Eve they hung the corpse of Jesus the Nazarene after they killed him by way of stoning … because he practiced sorcery, incited people to idol worship, and led the Jewish people astray.” ..................... Sotah 47a:14 “Jesus … went and stood up a brick and worshipped it as an idol … he caused the masses to sin … Jesus the Nazarene performed sorcery, and he incited the masses, and subverted the masses, and caused the Jewish people to sin.” ..................... Shabbat 104b:5 “Didn’t the infamous ben Stada. ben pandeira. jesus take magic spells out of Egypt … His mother’s husband, who acted as his father, was named Stada, but the one who had relations with his mother and fathered him was named Pandeira … his mother Miriam … This one strayed from her husband.”
@@MrPhone-ks8zy jesus failed prophecy in bible ⬇️ those days “ ‘the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.’ 30 “Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory. 31 And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other. 32 “Now learn this lesson from the fig tree: As soon as its twigs get tender and its leaves come out, you know that summer is near. 33 Even so, when you see all these things, you know that it is near, right at the door. 34 📣Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.📣
nazi or whatever his name is, is the king of cringe. He would make a killing on Reddit if he was around today. WOAH SO PROFOUND BECAUSE... IT JUST IS, OKAY?!!
When I read the Gospels they seem to be documenting actual historical events. Even the Gospel of John with its beautiful theology and symbolism has now been shown by modern archeology and historians to be historically accurate.
@@auburnqt6225 yes. Here is some archaeological evidence that confirms Gospel details: The nineteenth-century discovery of the Pool of Bethesda mentioned in John 5 The 1961 discovery in Caesarea of an inscription with Pontius Pilate’s name The 1961 discovery in Caesarea Maritima of a third-century mosaic that had the name “Nazareth” in it, the first known ancient nonbiblical reference Coins bearing the names of the Herodian dynasty: Herod the king, Herod the tetrarch of Galilee (who had John the Baptist murdered), Herod Agrippa I (who killed James Zebedee), and Herod Agrippa II (before whom Paul testified) The 1990 discovery of an ossuary that had the Aramaic words “Joseph son of Caiaphas” inscribed on it The ossuary discovered near Jerusalem in 1968 that contained the bones of a first-century man who had been crucified, details of which confirm the Gospel narratives of Jesus’ crucifixion This is a good book on the topic. John P. Meier, A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the History Jesus, vol. II Here is a good article on the reliability of the Gospels. Hope this helps. www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/the-reliability-of-the-gospels
I love how when the xtians were worried it wasnt historical you all argue its non literal but now you feel evidence is their suddenly you've switched again. Sounds like you guys lack so called faith.
@@woozworldbabe312 there are more ancient New Testament texts than any other ancient texts in history. We have more copies of old texts closest to Jesus life than any other historical figure in that era or before.
Nietzche almost had it... but man he's got so much anger and pain inside it seems. We know 3 of Jesus's Apostles does as martyrs and possibly more. They died believing in the Gospels and not in Nietzche's insightful but incomplete picture of Jesus. That means they died believing in the miracles Jesus did and believing Him to be the Son of God.
Probably karma for what your people did during the Spanish Inquisition , the forced conversion of North Americans and Australian indigenous . The support of slavery and the burning and hanging of so-called witches which was also false accusation based killings. Yeah good thing you don’t believe in karma lol.
Christianity is dismantling itself, as it's slowly being unable to explain the new World we live in. It is the natural cycle of life that ideas and theologies run through.
Perhaps it is the polemical nature of people or of Nietzsche himself but after reading him it baffles me that his ideas are not let to stand alone but instead must be considered as antithetical to Christianity. A mature Christian would not deny his analysis of “the kingdom of God is within you” but simply go a step further and declare that the kingdom of heaven is both within you on earth and in heaven. The hinterwelt philosophy may be a ditch that many Christians fall into, but Nietzsche correctly asserts that it isn’t what Jesus whether man or divine lived. I have found his explorations of human nature to be undeniably revealing and the sincerity of conviction which he displays inspiring. This is not an insufferable “middle ground” remark in which I make any compromise as a Christian, but praise for the ideas of a man who couldn’t believe in universal truths yet spent his life searching for them. Truths cannot be mutually exclusive and while I know that there was not room for God in his philosophy, there is not only room for but consensus with much of his philosophy in Christianity. I enjoy your channel because you present ideas with good will and a desire for truth.
@@swagkachu3784 RU-vid trolls are so immature, low and despicable. Beware of channels such as 'SwagKachu' that show all the typical indications of a troll.
An occultist and a deceiver. Come to Christ. No man is promised tomorrow. Jesus is God in the flesh who took on the punishment for our sins. We are a corrupt bunch and we are all on our way to destruction and Hell fire, before repenting and believing on Christ. Repentance is a change of mind, this kind of repentance is simply a matter of acknowledging your sinful ways and choosing to reject it and being reborn, as a child of God, by believing on Christ and Christ alone. Ephesians 2:8 KJV For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast Colossians 2:8 KJV Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
Very interesting video. Some counterpoints (whether to the video creator, Nietz, or both): 1) asceticism coupled with an atheistic belief is perhaps the most absurd of all ways to live. Without a goal of transcending this world for something greater (as in- beyond this world), denying oneself the avenues of agency & pleasure of this world, is pointless & self-defeating. Essentially, one is then just dying to this world with nowhere to actually go. One might as well just actually die in that case or just live for today. At least christian/deistic/etc asceticism has the goal of attaining a better existence entirely, as an effect of such denial. 2) the last part of the video sends some sharp, pointed accusations against early Christians [such accusations are probably accurate for LATER Christians]. Yet, there is nothing given to back up these claims of the early Christians flipping the message of Christ for their own selfish gain of some sort. When in fact, evidence, both of secular & religious, shows the early Christians living out (albeit, as best imperfect humans can) & spreading the message of Christ.
Why would it be absurd to have self discipline and not believe in religion?? What a strange view. That would be like saying all religious believers are hedonistic... there is no good rationale behind it. Why would it be necessary to transcend this world to find value in existence? I'm not following where you coming from or going with this.
@@johnprendergast4881 no, I'm not saying self-discipline is absurd without a spiritual/religious aspect. I was only speaking to the specific self-discipline of asceticism, but even then i think i could see how that could have purpose without any view beyond this life. Although i guess its just harder for me, personally, to envisage that. Also, i'm not saying a person needs to transcend this world to find value in existence. I was just kind of hyper focusing on the whole idea behind asceticism & in regards to whatever point(s) i had in mind from the vid. But i wouldn't want that to be taken as an absolute; i don't like closing down exploring. Thanks for clarifying.
The bible in yoshua: Slaughter all of them, man and woman, adult and child, ox and donkey.... The bible in mathew: But i tell you, even he who only insults his brother will be in the everlasting fires of hell... It's about as consistent as listening to politicians.
Nietzche says not to trust the gospel then quotes a line from the gospel to state Jesus is a man in psychology form 🥴 And the story of napoleon, where the heroism of the character remains known but the stories differ. If you look at Jesus's stories, they are no different. Every religion or story of Jesus refers to Him as God, Prophet, or some supernatural being. Implying high high importance. Kinda like napoleon being regarded as a superior man in essence. We talk about the characters of heroism and that you have to fight and conquor and do all these things, many of which are terrible calamities, to be considered a hero. Yet Nietzche uses the line that the devil is the prince of this world, who controls it. So heroism in essence is in the devils control/discrepancy. Heroism is not as great as one claims, atleast, in the way we coined the term heroism. Hence why Jesus didn't act out to be the hero in the human eyes.. That is because he had something greater. What a real hero is. If you look at Jesus Psychologically. His actions speak volume, because he in his Intellect sees his actions as being greater than the one which we consider heroism. Because in his actions, if everyone followed suit. We would not be dealing with all these calamities and man made problems/errors and inner hatred towards others. Lastly, if Jesus was this teacher who spoke of love and dignity and turn the cheek. There ain't no way in hell he ends up on the cross 😂 Nietzche nice try my boy
Nietzsche seems to forget that every claim Jesus made in the gospels was based on cultural knowledge of the time. If he wants to analyze the true psychology of Jesus, he cant remove him from his culture. The claims he made are congruent with the messiah prophezised in the old testament, and which he attributed to himself, so in essence, nietzsche even got the most basic part of his message wrong because he omited the very core of it. Let us not forget the majority if the new testament is written by people who met Jesus. Even one of his brothers is written in there. I never understand this argument that the gospels were written a hundred years after his death because it completely fails to mention the letters of Paul give credence to the gospels as written, and he hot the ok from Peter himself. “Oh but how do you know Peter didnt get the real messege?”. Its all just so lazy seriously. The least bit of preasure breaks this bridge.
Unlike what he thought, I don’t think the man the myths of Jesus were ever about or even the fictional character made in the Bible, it never seemed to be on his mind to be anyone’s hero. The guy clearly told everyone he was a path, a door, a gate, not a source; not a hero. He never claimed to be great, he was in fact a rebel no matter how you want to see it, rebellion is a huge part of his story for good reason, because he was rebellious. Jesus used rebellion as a point of exposing truth, Jesus obsessed about truth and being in a constant state of it. None of this indicates a hero. He never saved someone from peril; tho he did help many. The most heroic thing I can recall Jesus doing was the recuse on the Sea of Galilee. However this is also all allegorical and symbolic. So it’s not literal and it’s a way of talking about life; rocky waters; and learning how to navigate them instead of bobbing on the up and down waves; you simply walk over them. The man was not a hero, he was not a savior; he was a wise man with tools he wanted to share with people that have a obsession with believing their own stories to a point t they will kill their own children and sacrifice people looking out for them. Nothing has changed. Meaning his work as a hero would have been in vane.
The words "The Kingdom of God is within you." Can be subject to different Interpretations, especially when putting it in context with other verses. It doesn't inherently mean something solely inward.
As a Christian, I reject almost everything Nietzche says about Christianity, but it's interesting that even our greatest opponents have only positive things to say about Christ. Normally I respect Nietzche's thought processes even if his conclusions are a stretch. But on this topic he seems little different from the average Reddit or YT atheist. Everyone always wants to say the Apostles and Church Fathers changed the Bible to suit their desires. But the people saying that are only making the claim to suite their own desire to disparage Christ's legacy without disparaging Him. For this and similar reasons I don't believe in atheists. Everyone believes in God deep down, some just don't like his commandments.
@@Adsper2000 Apples and oranges my friend. Few people criticize the Buddha because few people know anything about him. Even if they know a lot about Buddhism, they probably don’t know anything about the man other that he meditated under a tree until he discovered the secrets of the universe. I will criticize Buddha, he was either a liar or a fool. And when I say I don’t believe that the people I’m referring to are atheists, I also don’t believe they’re Christians. It is perfectly consistent to believe in God and still reject Him. John Milton wrote a whole book about it (not strictly Biblically accurate, but close enough for this point).
@@rightwingsafetysquad9872 What about a Chinese person, who knows a lot about the Buddha and grew up hearing about his story? If they can’t criticize him (since the guy led a sinless life and all), does that mean they must believe in his teachings?
@@Adsper2000 Let's go with that premise. Do those people deny that the Buddha's teachings are real? People like Nietzsche deny Jesus taught what's in the Bible. They don't say "great man, but he's wrong". They say Peter and Paul lied about Jesus.
Jesus came to the Judas from the far North. His physical appearance was different from arabs. Blue eyes, long blond hear, strong, tall body... His name was Radomir and he was one of the descendants of GODS who came to the planet Earth from Space about 600 000 years ago. There is a great book "VEDI" about humans origins of different races.
Reminder that even Nietzsche flip ploped around this topic, due to the helenization of the western sphere Jesus fits neatly in the same catogory as Dionisus Achetype, the gone and returning heir of the Father. Nietzsche even called himself the crucified one and dyonisus intermitently.
🎣If anyone reading this wants to be closer to the Lord I’d encourage you to speak to God with your voice. He hears our thoughts but our minds can be evil. Understand his 10 commandments and what Jesus said about them. And with the faith even the size of a mustard seed, repent turning from your sin. Download the Bible it’s wisdom is free and it’s our Souls (Daily) bread. And lastly Always pray in Jesus name 🙏🏾-Nazirite
I used to read Antichrist before, Nietzsche said Judas wasn't the traitor, but it's the other apostle that was the traitor since he changed the wisdom of Jesus
@@Hoe-numan5 There is absolutely zero historical proof that jesus ever existed, not as a prophet, not as a carpenter, not as a martyr, not as the son of god. Christianity was the original psy-op, and confirmation for the powers that be, that the sky's the limit, when it comes to controlling the masses.
You have given us so much with your clear and focused presentation. I have not rejected Neitzche following Bretrand Russel, byt sm much richer for listening to your work. Thanks.
"The tragic hero assures himself that the ethical obligation is totally present in him by transforming it into a wish. Agamemnon, for example, can say: To me the proof that I am not violating my fatherly duty is that my duty is my one and only wish. Consequently we have wish and duty face to face with each other. Happy is the life in which they coincide, in which my wish is my duty and the reverse, and for most men the task in life is simply to adhere to their duty and to transform it by their enthusiasm into their wish. The tragic hero gives up his wish in order to fulfill his duty. For the knight of faith, wish and duty are also identical, but he is required to give up both. If he wants to relinquish by giving up his wish, he finds no rest, for it is indeed his duty. If he wants to adhere to the duty and to his wish, he does not become the knight of faith, for the absolute duty specifically demanded that he should give it up. The tragic hero found a higher expression of duty but not an absolute duty." Kierkegaard "Fear and trembling"
people used by satan Will always Make Jesus Look like zero but in reality he is a God and Alive and this Guy is dead waiting to meet Christ at The Day of judgement
Jesus Christ did not preach Psychology…. He preached The Soul/Spirit/Holy Spirit….. He is the Son of God, and God starts his human dialectic by perfection first… the soul is pure…. Psychology is only of this World… Worldly knowledge… the soul is divine, and is more Supernatural if anything….. Psychology can be DArK,,, evil manipulative ways…. You can twist psychology.. Preaching the matter of the Soul/metaphysics can not be distorted to evil ways….. this is why the Devil/Lucifer wants your soul… it’s the most untouchable sense of pureness… the Light brings the image of God
Leonardo da Vinci said " The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions " Plato shared with us wisdom he learnt from Egypt, wisdom that was a death sentence in Greece, Rome ( Christianity ) ..Pythagoras, Socrates and later Hypatia of Alexandria. Plato in his dialogue " The Republic " tells the allegory of " The Cave " Plato starts by telling us of prisoners being held in a sort of underground den, let us examine this den via the geometry of Bernhard Riemann and Felix Klein..Klein bottle..3rd and 4th dimensions. Plato tells us that the prisoners are bound up unable to move their heads, let us examine this bondage via the psychology of Erich Fromm.. socialisation of consciousness.. aware-unaware. Plato tells us that the prisoners mistake shadows for substance, let us examine this mistake via the philosophy of Thales and Kant..synthetic a priori..not thing in itself. Plato tells us that one of the prisoners is released, let us examine this release via the instructions given by T.Lobsang Rampa..stilling the mind and conscious astral travel..leaving the cave/body. Plato tells us that the prisoners will reject this release, let us examine this rejection via the psychological effects of Stockholm syndrome..Plato quotes Homer " Better to be a poor man, and have a poor master, and endure anything, than to think and live after their manner " Men are not prisoners of fate, but only prisoners of their own minds. Mathew 23 13 31.
The allegory of " The Cave " What about The allegory Ship_of_Theseus a thing that is changed to much is no longer the thing same as is trans humanism The prison aka (Tartarus) a cave temple prison Aladdin is like it to in some ways A'LAD'IN A lad in a cave his task is very similar to Theseus to go into hell just like chirst or unmuseum maze Ship_of_Theseus Caerleon wales King Arthur or King Theseus ??. Augustus mausoleum Constantine's Sword www.britannica.com/event/Pax-Romana
The allegory of " The Cave " What about The allegory Ship_of_Theseus a thing that is changed to much is no longer the thing same as is trans humanism The prison aka (Tartarus) a cave temple prison Aladdin is like it to in some ways A'LAD'IN A lad in a cave his task is very similar to Theseus to go into hell just like chirst or unmuseum maze Ship_of_Theseus Caerleon wales King Arthur or King Theseus ??. Augustus mausoleum Constantine's Sword
How can you leave the body and hope to be closer to God when the Kingdom of God is within you? The opposite idea is what evildoers have people believe so that they may confuse them and have their spirits leave their vessel so that something else may enter in. Spiritual nourishment is all you need and communing with the inner spirit, which the silver cord (i.e. umbilical cord for the spirit) is attached to, like the umbilical cord is the cord to worldly life. Btw other new age groups (not sure if I can mention them without getting this comment removed) teach people that their spirit is tied to an outer spirit like a baby to the placenta. But they have it wrong (on purpose), that outer spirit doesn't exist, it's just the inner spirit being pushed out of the vessel.
How can you leave the body and hope to be closer to God when the Kingdom of God is within you? The opposite idea is what evildoers have people believe so that they may confuse them and have their spirits leave their vessel so that something else may enter in. Spiritual nourishment is all you need and communing with the inner spirit, which the silver cord (i.e. umbilical cord for the spirit) is attached to, like the umbilical cord is the cord to worldly life. Btw other new age groups (not sure if I can mention them without getting this comment removed) teach people that their spirit is tied to an outer spirit like a baby to the placenta. But they have it wrong (on purpose), that outer spirit doesn't exist, it's just the inner spirit being pushed out of the vessel.
How can you leave the body and hope to be closer to God when the Kingdom of God is within you? The opposite idea is what evildoers have people believe so that they may confuse them and have their spirits leave their vessel so that something else may enter in. Spiritual nourishment is all you need and communing with the inner spirit, which the silver cord (i.e. umbilical cord for the spirit) is attached to, like the umbilical cord is the cord to worldly life. Btw other new age groups (not sure if I can mention them without getting this comment removed) teach people that their spirit is tied to an outer spirit like a baby to the placenta. But they have it wrong (on purpose), that outer spirit doesn't exist, it's just the inner spirit being pushed out of the vessel.
What would jeebus NOT do??? Speak against slavery and all of the even MUCH worse things it's ALL for. But the flock just hide and ignore all of that. They love their mind screws!!
Somewhere in the Bible it says: “you shall know them by their fruits”. And the fruits of Christ and his followers are plentiful and with Nitzche… well not so good
If we're going by that logic, you just made life even worse for yourself. As the followers of Christ had caused myriad amounts of pain, destruction, hypocrisy and regression to the world that makes their Good deeds pale in comparison. And still frequently cause it, to the point it's worth celebrating when one does a good thing. Same can be said of the followers of the 2 Abrahamic religions. The amount of damage (and also good) caused by Nieztchian philosophy is but a speck of sand next to it. That's a very dumb argument.
@@IbnElKhattab Please enlighten me how moral relativism is better than objective moralism? Or in other words, please explain why this philosophy that enables evil like rape and murder are better than the teachings of Christ?
@@JosephusAurelius brother you have objective relativism in the bible like forcing a raped woman to marry her rapist, then you go tell me this is the old testament well that is moral relativism like you are trying to tell me that god prohibited rape then saw soo bad that he condemns it
Not one psychologist nor pyschiatrist would claim examining the psychological state of a person whom they haven't met, including dead ones, is legitimate. Why does Nietzsche get a free pass?
I would argue that Nietzsche is using the term very loosely, given that Psychology had been incredibly recently invented in his age. What he’s interested in is Jesus’ mindset, not history, miraculous powers or ontological relationship with God, which make it a somewhat psychological exploration.
That's actually not true. There have been plenty of studies to contemplate for example whether famous dead people were autistic, had personality disorders, or other mental ailments, just based on what we know about them. Surely you've read the phrase " Psychologists from the University of whatever believe whoever was likely thus, because of their etc. Etc"
This is very disappointing from Nietzsche, imagine him arguing semantics, redefining the term “hero” to fit his description. A hero is in all cases an individual who struggles willingly to bring about change on a societal/cultural level, Jesus did that, he did not suffer meaninglessly, he intended change. His means were non-violent but is Ghandi then too not a hero? This is ridiculous. When he speaks of equality, he means to say anyone could be a hero but not in those words. It’s not the one who stands above all which defines hero, Jesus, in fact, came to change that dogmatic tradition which idolizes a set of individuals in making of sinners saints.
Ghandhi was not a hero, a great person who stirred up great protests, but was racist,womaning and he tried to destroy political careers of those other revolutionaries who tried to free India but differed with him. Some say he stagnated the withdrawal of British for his political ambitions. Not related to Jesus, just saying. His(Ghandhi) way was kind of decadent.
He defined could’ve been a huge inspiration for Ãdolf Hitlër from all I’ve heard about some of his ideas on whether or not some people bring society further and if they should still be allowed to live. Disgusting
Quite literally all I hear in this is already the position of Christianity. I see no refutation here. Precisely what is described IS Salvation and death on the cross is the highest testament to Jesus' notions of giving oneself for others, loving them beyond oneself, and turning the other cheek. The Kingdom of God within us is the notion of unity with God, inasmuch as that is the fulfilment of the ethical archetype which is Jesus, the Logos, in precisely what is mentioned in this video. To be in His image. We have that ethical drive within us. That does not mean it already is actualized, so both notions can be true, that also the Kingdom of God is to come, where sheep and wolves lay by eachother (to think that it is not to come is to think that we are already ethical -thinking that we aren't allows for us to be). Now of course to the Christian, Jesus is God, but I don't find the notions addressing this in Nietzche adequate. Jesus was opposed to hatred, which Jesus conquered. He conquered any drive for evil or temptation, which is to say He evidently was not apatethic to us opposing the urges within ourselves. This is a conquest, most evident in the greatest renunciation of this impulsive notion of self, on the cross. Jesus wrestles with His suffering, and calls out to God as He deems Himself foresaken. The affirmation of God while feeling abandoned by Him on account of this suffering is the nature of Christ, or the Saviour, in it's Biblical context. Jesus is left as a sacrifice at the hands of the world. But since it is He who is God, it is He who has abandoned Himself. This is fulfillment of David, but also of Job. It is He who wrestles with God, with Himself, and ends up in this giving way to martyrdom and our notions of holding ourselves to our convictions wholeheartedly. Zizek would say God Himself became an atheist on the cross. I would say God became a Knight of Faith, where He still affirmed God even if abandoned by Him. And He was indeed abandoned, He abandoned Himself. The resurrection then shows that this gave way to the conquering of death. It is in line with that Evangelical outlook one holds to, with that innermost faith one has for going beyond the senses, beyond sin (in our impulse for hatred, our sexual urges, other urges such as hunger which Jesus ultimately conquers, first in His fasting in the desert, and also the urge of all fallen being, precisely the will to death that He conqueres in resurrection). It is not beyond the scope of His character that one is to conquer the urge to death also. In fulfilling the ethical archetype, one becomes united with the eternal logos (simply by being those virtues and abandoning yourself). One foregoes mortality. That is what heaven is. The choice we make by which we forego mortality, which comes trough acting out that Kingdom of God within us. Trough striving in becoming the archetype that was Jesus (which we cannot do without God, for it is prideful [and as such against it] to believe we can). We are to seek apotheosis, unity with God. This is that which I was thought as an Orrhodox Christian.
Because , Nietzsche was an ingnorant satanist who didn’t know about the sacrifices of others , an indolent who i know is one of those people who , no matter how kind you are and how helpful you are with them , you will not be able to indulge or accommodate them .. Jesús saved more people with his kind words, more than Nitchzse could save on the fingers of his hand …
One persons will to power, changed by others to fit their own will to power? Isn't that Nietzschian too? Nietzsche can never seem to agree withhimself. He wants ideals and power to be one. Or does he simply care about those who 'create' their own will to power, rather then using others, and their will to fit themselves? That too can be seen as idealistic. Categorize people into weak and strong, and you won't understand what to call the weak when they win. Physical power is not power itself. And we see this play out today when people talk about 'survival of the strongest' rather then the 'fittest'. Reality is diffrent from ideals im afraid.
Great point! The nazis would fit into the first category of people changing his Will to power in order to fit into their own world view (Will to power). A Will to power In unity. Whilst Nietzsche had almost no disciples or followers during his own lifetime. Was he a failure according to his own philosophy?
@@Stefanio64 In regards to failure. It feels like i say this in every video about nietzsche, but i would love to hear what the early nietzsche would think about later nietzsche.
@@Stefanio64 indeed, i would even say that its often up to chance aswell, where chance is simply anything one doesn't control, or couldn't have guessed would happen.
Very interesting, Nietzsche made a lot of assumptions and is very skeptical of the mythical/spiritual side of Jesus. Although I as a Christian do not agree with him, I understand his decision to reject chrisianity to admire Jesus himself as a person. He had a very unique and insightful look at things, which you painted very clear in this video
@@WeltgeistYT Qual é o feito de Nietzsche mesmo pra uma pessoa que seja? Qual é seu legado? Mudou vida de quem? Ele é o que pra quem? O que ele disse, pensa fez importa ou modifica a vida de quem? Já Jesus Cristo............
christian’s playing mental gymnastics in the comments because they feel offended is funny to me. you should never be so attached to a religious theory that you aren’t able to consider a world in which it would all be false…. that’s religions greatest fallacy- convincing us of it’s objective truth. there is no objective truth in a realm we humanly cannot know, only speculation and theory. this is just another theory, alongside christianity, islam, hinduism, buddhism, animism, shamanism…. it’s weird how many people think their truth is THE truth but don’t simultaneously acknowledge that if other people feel the same, with the same conviction- then the only truth is that there clearly isn’t one….
