Why Norway is Preparing for a Massive War With Russia 

That single road supplying Murmansk is likely why more Arctic military bases are being re-equipped, re-opened afresh, and also why there is the expansion of an ice-breaker fleet, to improve that logistic. Russia obviously wants to control the Arctic region. Remember also, the Arctic, as a region, while still vast, is much smaller than maps suggest, so distances from those other military bases to Svalbard and everywhere in the Arctic, are less.

​@@TheMalcolmPowderBut not less for flat earthers. 😅😅😅

@@Justwantahover indeed, it is a bit of a stretch for them

@@Justwantahover From what I've seen of most Flat Earther maps, they think the disc revolves around the Arctic in the centre. So for once, they and reality do agree on something - the size of the arctic. It's the Antarctic that they think is huge and encompasses the outer rim of the disc.

​@@JustwantahoverDo you really want to go against centuries of Muslim teachings? Tons of scripture? Or is this that you wish to demean BIPOC even further? Probably this.

Norway stands with Finland, no worries

Thanks a lot Finland. With you on our side Russia is nothing!

Sweden got your backs as well brothers. Anything for our nordic family.

Us Nordics got each others backs always.

@@MatzeMB85 We know. And it is just great. Love Sweden!

Sweden be like: You need any of our Gripen fighter jets? (Sweden already had offered Gripen to Finnland, but pretty darn sure if Norway would be attacked the other Nordic countries would all pitch in before NATO even moved)

SOLOVYOV, Propaganda shows promoting how much LOVE💘 he has for the 🇳🇴Norwegians.

Russia has more than 1.2 million soldiers

@@thomaspersson688 oh sounds like alot of soldiers, but i m not that worried. Averidge life expectansy for russian men is lower than brazilians, russians are not that patriotic as you would think. Otherwise they would not have to pay that much or use rapist and murderers to do the fighting for not so patriotic moscowites

@@thomaspersson688 Not for long, if they try this.

Finland can wreak havoc on russian supply lines while Sweden is perfectly positioned to provide air support and Denmark can provide strong naval support. And of course Norway have the economic capacity to finance anything that can be imagined.

I do believe the Nordics alone are crazy powerful combined. I wouldn't want to face any of them separately and especially not combined. Just Finland alone is a territory of death for whoever isnt welcome. And the Finland of today is the most prepared Finland in its entire history with extreme amount of bunkers and 1 million man trained army, extremely capable, extremely educated, and developed

We are decendants from vikings, and we Will fight back to back, and russians seems to forget what happened last time viking fought toghether. They are only drunk kosacks in reality.

Nato is also investing alot to protect the artic and northern norway

@@vikinnorway6725 indeed. Because its needed. Russia is playing a dangerous game already there. Norway shouldnt be the only one defending important interests. And its time all European nations follow Greeces lead in spending over 3% for many years now. Greece spends 3.9% like last year. If all European nations spend this money, its going to be a massive increase in war capability. Which will be a nightmare for Russia

I went to norway once to uncle for few days and have no regrets, norway is cool af.I love the climate there etc love norway❤

@@sniperniko 🙏❤️

@@snipernikoclimate is dogpoopoo

Hell og lykke til oss alle!

Angriper dem oss klokka 0400 på søndags morgen er alle så fyllesyke at vi har ikke stått opp føre vi er Russiske 😅

They might station more people around their coal mines, and slowly start to claim the coal mine is actually larger than previously thought and hence has to expand into Norwegian Svalbard, hence invade - but not according to themselves ofc.

@@preferredpronoun3689 the Russia Ukraine war is a war of attrition and not shock and awe invasion of territory that the US really like to do. They are advancing very slowly in terms of teritory so its highly unlikely that they will get past Ukraine. Nato troops are in Ukraine and right close to the Russian border. Ukraine was bombing Donbass for 8 uears with US training , funding.

@@lemdixon01 Pretty sure the Russians tried shock and awe, but it didn't work. Now it's a grinding war yes.

​@@preferredpronoun3689 det er USANATO-TERRORVELDE som stjeler ressurser rundt i verden. Etter å ha bomba landene tilbake til steinalderen. Siden 1991 har USA deltatt i over 270 kriger. Russland har deltatt i rundt 40. HVEM er den aggressive, sa de? En annen VIKTIG ting. USA har forårsaket ALLE kriger de har deltatt i. Russland har kun forsvart seg mot TERRORORGANISASJONEN USANATO-TERRORVELDE og psykopatiske, sinnsyke og maktsyke amerikanere som har omringet Russland med over 200 militærbaser i korrupte land i Europa, som Norge. Korrupte politikere som tar seg betalt for å selge landet og folket. Sånn som politikerne i Norge (og EU) sleiker USA oppetter USA-rævva full av DRITT, er kvalmt. Men karma kommer nok og sender de til fengsel, resten av deres liv. Etter det venter deres elskede far, Satan, i HELVETE på de.

@@lemdixon01 I agree. Nato would go for it full scale if they tried. Alot too lose if that happens.

​@watonemillionI mean, yeah, their own government exploits them pretty horribly.

Remember the “Reds under the Bed” scare during the Cold War day’s? But the real problem is that the Western nation’s covet Russia’s vast natural resources of grain, oil, etc. etc. Just as Napoleon, and then Hitler, wished and then attempted to plunder Russia’s resources in the past.

In this case are 'the police' the United States military? If so what if they don't answer your call?

@@slugface322 then it's time to get out the shot gun

@watonemillion I have met many Russians, and they are fine people. I would say their mindset is way less aggressive than for example most Americans. Nothing wrong with them at all! You need to learn to separate between government and people.

That's kind of the problem though, how credible is that deterrence? Especially under the republicans? Our European allies won't risk everything for Svalbard if the US don't join in. And islands are already kind of considered a special case... Just look at some of the islands explicitly excluded from the treaty... An attack on mainland Norway would definitely be responded to, even without US help. But Svalbard? Its a price Europe might be willing to pay, even if we don't...

@@Luredreier europe part of nato is still stronger then russia could ever be

Ooh I'm scared not more fools

​@@Gregerlindstromyour reading some fine propaganda there bro

​@@GregerlindstromEurope couldn't stand up without the USA Canada and Australia. Especially without the UK. The only power in Europe has France. Ukraine with all the equipment is just as strong as France and they still have problems against 1/10 of Russians army.

and berentzsea to the Dutch. yeah. Norway has enough access to healty Cod. And theys rich enough to eat something else a bit more. :P

Wrong. Norway has authority over but Svalbard is not Norway International land

Yes but also no, it’s under the authority of Norway but not actually international land.

No, its RUssia, in fact very soon the whole of Ukraine will be Russian thanks to the USA.

I agree! Most should know that I have several videos about Crimea. My position on this is clear. It appears that the map editing software my editor uses automatically highlights Crimea as part of Russia. If you don’t remember to specifically do work to exclude it, it’s included in the animation. We didn’t notice because the focus of this video was on Norway, and we were looking at the animations from that perspective. When working through 30 minutes of visuals sometimes those things get missed. I do apologize, and am frustrated that our map animation software automatically does that.

@@MultiMyNickName 2022: "Very soon the whole of Ukraine will be Russia." 2023: "Very soon the whole of Ukraine will be Russia." 2024: "Very soon the whole of Ukraine will be Russia."

@@MultiMyNickName 🤣🤣 didn't you say that since 24february2022?? You went from 3 days to moscos submarine, regroup, freedom legion, march2moscow, heating, chicken eggs, flood, more freedom legion, more flood 🤣🤣

@@ruZsiaNa-C If Crimea is Ukraine why I don't see Ukr flags there?

Just simply stopping ferries would halt their advance past Bodø.

Tunnels, bridges, most of Norway is mountains. No way for a fleet to invade along the coast. Airlifts? Forget it. An army moving south from Finnmark would be stopped dead by blown up tunnels, valleys (which would be bombed asunder if any convoy moved through), and forests unsuited for vehicles etc. Any invasion by ruzzia into Norway would be a death sentence.

@@Hasdrubhaal Only country to ever sucessfully invade Norway was Na*i Germany, with loads of issues on their way and most of their objectives were sabotaged and important ships sunk.

As Ruzzia has found out the very hard way in Ukraine. Norway is better off with armed forces, munitions and allied support (NATO) now than Ukraine was at start of their war and look how they managed to stave off defeat, in open flat lands, reclaiming much of what was first taken. Two years later, Ruzzia has been unable to reclaim the lands they first took and will never succeed. Norway already has a natural defense in place along with years of preparations ... Ruzzia is doomed to fail no matter what they attempt. But am sure they intend to do as much damage as possible if and when possible though.

@@MsSquirl00 To be fair planners in Russia (especially Putin) will be more prepared to prevent the stupidity caused by corruption in the military (eg. tanks without gas/oil to drive because the soldiers sold it). Though that's not even close to compensating for terrain and military alliance of the nordic countries.

Try driving a NORMAL CAR from north to south. Then repeat with a whack-a-mole conga line of obsolete tanks without backup resources. Oh, and try the waffles at Kristins outside Bodø!

@MsSquirl00 why would Russia be interested in taking territory when they already have so much of their own and it doesn't matter if they lose some. This is a Western mentality and its a war of attrition.

@@lemdixon01 Do you realize the question you asked?? Is this the warmonging Ruzzian mentality talking? If your comment is anywhere near accurate, then why did Ruzzia invade Ukraine? Why is Ruzzia claiming they want to restore the USSR as it was? Why are they throwing hundreds of thousands of lives for cannon fodder to retake lands they already took and lost? If you can answer any of these questions, then you have your answer ...

2 Polish farmers got killed by russian rocket. Several drones dropped on NATO members. NATO did say that it would be Article 5. It was not. You seem to be slow, not the week.

@@IlyaDemidov It was a Ukrainian air defence missile, as concluded by the Polish Prosecutor’s Office. Clearly someone has been reading headlines and failing to follow-up on the developing story.

​​@@IlyaDemidov They died when pieces of an **intercepted** Russian rocket fell on them. Those drones dropped on grass at the very border.... how are you even making these comparisons? None were outright Russian aggression towards a NATO member. Edit: lol, you are Russian. No wonder.

​@IlyaDemidov NATO said it would be Article 5 if Russia goes after a NATO country, not in the case of mistakes. Russia has not yet grown a pair since NATO was founded.

​@@Oliver_Saer Russia flies armed attack helicopters over Poland: it's nothing. Photos and video come out: oh ignore it. Romania has to deal with cruise missiles in their airspace so Russia can avoid Ukrainian air defense: oh it's fine. Also remember article 5 says nothing about the scale of the help that must be provided. Send a dozen helmets, 2 jeeps and a first aid kit: all done. Russia is testing and getting away with a lot. NATO is weak and afraid.

The fact that Norway flipped the table in ww2 to the matter of its hard to hold, over to, its hard to flee, as 500.000 germans or so were trapped in Norway so they could not bolster the eastern front. Comparing Norway to Afghanistan is an understatemen. Afghanistan is more hilly than mountainous compared to Norways over 50% landmass being over 60% curvature. And crossing a fjord is much harder than crossing a wide river. Russia would struggle to get far simply due to most of the northern roads are connected by ferries, so just stopping them would halt their entire advance.

....and when and what, during WW2, did the Germans find out "how difficult Norway was to hold". It seem like you have ideas of history that no one else have heard about.... I can't find much basis in reality of your claim. With the two single exceptions of Narvik (April to June 1940) ....where they were vastly outnumbered in men and materiel.... they lost Narvik but than given back the control after a few days when the allied forces left and Norway capitulated.... ....then at the end of 1944 (October) where the Soviet Army pushed the Germans out of Kirkenes / Varanger. So the reality is that the Germans was not much challenged during their 5 years of occupation of Norway.....and did not find out anything of how "hard" it was...... You could need some extra study of history.

@@Dan-fo9dk Norway wasn't hard to hold, its the total oposite, it was hard for them to invade, and then escape afterwards because Norway have the ability to close down quite rapidly in terms of blowing bridges, shoot down planes and blow up boats. At no point did the germans have ahard time to "Hold" Norway, this is why now Norway is so much harder to invade simply due to the fact that our own military is much more prepared than we were back then.

@@Dan-fo9dk 😂😱😱💯💯💯

@@oblivionnokk3531 The only thing which is hard here is to figure out where you have you "info" from. There were never 500 000 German soldiers standing in Norway.... the normal estimate is of around 400 000. Your story about that the German troops tried "to flee" Norway ...and were "trapped" ....would be a new one for historians. Until the very few last weeks before Germany's fall there were nothing that "trapped" them or blocked them from "fleeing" from Norway. You also say that the German soldiers standing in Norway were prevented from "bolstering the eastern front." Again you have your own version of history. The reality was that the majority of the Germans standing in Norway came from the eastern front. They had been there fighting since the summer of 1941. You must be aware of that the eastern front was much more than the front in central-Europe. That same front stretched all the way north into the Arctic to the Barent's sea. The two areas the Germans were stationed were the Murmansk / Litsa front and the other one was together with the Finns on the Karelia front. Kirkenes was a base for around 160 000 Germans who tried to take Murmansk ....which was Soviet union's only ice free port of highest importance due to all the supplies they got on ships from the allied. Without the port and the supplies the outcome of WW2 would have been different. Hence it was very much a part of "the east front". People in Kirkenes very much experienced that they lived at the front since it was the most bombed place in Europe....only after Malta.... Just in order to survive they lived in the maze of tunnels at the iron ore mine at nearby Bjørnevatn. Finland had not been invaded by Germans but they had invited them to join them in order to take land inside Soviet ....but when the Finns, in the latter part of the war, saw that the Germans were on the losing end they asked the around 200 000 German troops to leave Finland ....and the eastern front.... and many of them ended up in Norway. Another reason for many German soldiers were standing in Norway (not trapped) were the ever so often random bombing (done by the Brits) along the coast of Norway in order to make the Germans to believe that an allied invasion into Norway could happen at any time. Strategically was Norway important for control of the North Atlantic and the control of the iron ore shipped out from Narvik. Hence there had to be a significant presents of German troops in Norway....which has nothing with being "trapped". Your ideas of how difficult it is to invade Norway....didn't work out during WW2....so it is only in theory it will work. You base your theory on that the Norwegian military is "much more prepared...." nowadays... To be better prepared than in 1940 should not be difficult ...since it was close to zero. The reality is that the Norwegian military is still not well prepared ....that's why the budget has been significantly increased in order to be better prepared at some point in the future... Finally you need some help with geography. What you call "northern roads are connected with ferries". Well....there are only one north-south road connecting northern Norway....it's named E6....and there are only one ferry ....

I suppose they could eat the incoming Tomahawks

Ships => submarines. 🤣

Submaries: exists

The US also very often has their subs following Russian ones. Even as they leave port.

@@O5-15. USA has listening devices all over the Atlantic and most likely critical parts of the Pacific as well. West always knows where the Russian subs are. Not only that, but before the Ukraine war broke out it was NORWAY, not Russia, that were decommissioning the old Soviet subs because the Russians lacked the means to and did not care about the environmental impact (program currently froze because of the war). The Russians also at first refused Norwegian deep sea sub tech aid during their Kursk sub disaster. Russia is weak.

Reading besides headlines is not for "better informed" it seems.

There is one possibility, and it names Trump.

Ukraine is a country of 44 million. Large army and many reserves. Norway is a lot smaller and has much less troops up north.

@@jamegumb7298 You do realise that population isn't everything, right? xD

@@jamegumb7298 Ukraine is flat and Ukraine is a poor country that was not prepared and does not have that strong of a military. Norway, Sweden and Finnland on the other hand each have very small but very modern armies. And their terrain greatly favours defence, would be a million times hard to conquer Norway than Ukraine, just from the landscape.

The main reason for the war in Ukraine was not to seize territories but to punish them for their atrocities against the ppl of Donbass but if you can take some territory along the way why pass on that

@@Acrillian Go back to your bunker Vlad. Putin has murdered and maimed millions of russian speakers. As if that tyrannical pig gives a F about people.

@@Acrillian what did they do?

@@Mozzarella-and-Tomato Ukraine has been shelling civilians in Donbas since 2014 and Donbass asked Russia for help

@@Acrillian oh thanks for the answer

Because they think it is a part of the US. 🤣🤣 And some western Canadians think this as well because of the political support they receive from the US GOP. They dont comprehend the difference between a country and a continent. Except for perhaps Mexico which they seem to think is a part of South America. Its also the fact most people world wide, refer to people from the continent of North America as Americans, just like people from the continent of Europe are Europeans. But people from the US over time, just call themselves American for short instead of United States of (North) America. I guess its easier to say American instead of United Statesian? Or how would you even say it? 🤣🤣

You'd be surprised to know that there are Americans who cannot find their own home state on a map.

@@enpakeksi765 Yes I agree! 😂😂

A place where Socialism is acceptable with their king Trudeau.

​@@enpakeksi765surprised? Not at all😅

Thanks so much for the generous support! It’s an important topic!

☺️

looks like a good time for western powers to send military training missions to svalbard.

@@tedcrilly46 Svalbard and Åland are demilitarized by treaty. Meaning that in peacetime, Norway and Finland are not allowed to place any military installations or troops there. Only if attacked,

@@kenster8270 yep. like i said.

Thats because Sweden is Scandinavia's China. ;) Look at the Gripen ....almost as cheap as a full stack Guitar Amp. :P

*shakes hand at sky* NETFLIX!!!!!

The least they could have done was have Tim Curry be the Russian spokesman.

You forget about nukes, or? I wouldn't be so confident and taunting. Nobody wants nuclear war.

....there is also a railway going to Murmansk.... ....and you seem to be unaware of the port city of Arkhangelsk which is an alternative to Murmansk....

@@rorschacht8478 Nukes are old news. Who cares. Russian nukes are more of a threat to Russia than whoever they aim for. Russian politics worsen life for Russians. Norway is Norway. Russia can't touch us through a kinetic traditional war. Taking Norway would be a liability to Russia, they would have to conquer the entire finno-scandic peninsuela to have a chance at holding it. Note: If they can't even conquer the donbas or defend kursk, they wont conquer the nordics or NATO. Even if you ignore article 5, the allies wouldn't allow Russians the strategic benefit the finno-scandic peninsuela would offer. Black ops operations and stupid bully mind-games against Norwegians on Svalbard could, however, work given enough time.

I don't see any big risks about Åland right now.

Its not clickbait. Everyone thought the same thing with Ukraine and look how that turned out. Only saving face for Ruzzia was that Ukraine is not NATO. Yet ... As always, Ruzzia will push the envelope as far as they can get, putting in place any and many strategic plans. Am sure Putler is waiting for the results of US elections this fall to determine how he proceeds further. He might test the waters at some point to measure NATO responses. If his propaganda machine is again effective in getting trump back in, trump WILL pull out of NATO and most likely side with Ruzzia. At that point, Ruzzia will have little fear of NATO.

I have a friend that works for the Norwegian government's communications authority. They are spending significantly more time up north combating and documenting Russian interference with communication networks than before the invasion.

​@spillredet There is also the increased number of interceptions along the northern border.

@@O5-15. Yes

Not just F35's but also P8 poseidons are cabable of sinking ships, and NSM and NASAM batteries in the north easly covers that range, most of the ships would not even manage to leave the port of murmansk.

I like your attitude. ⚔️

@@indigenousnorwegianeuropa4145famous last words

Spectacular!

it's important that it is slippery and greasy, very Putin like.....oh, and is lopsided....

It depends on how you count. Most of Norway's wealth is deliberatly kept away from the national economy to keep it from overheating. It's put into the National Pension Fund and invested abroad. I haven't checked the numbers but 300,000 sounds about right if we include the Pension Fund, 80,000 if we don't.

You’re looking at the wrong numbers. He was talking about the GDP per capita, not wealth

norway stand with norway🇳🇴🇳🇴💪💪💪

thats why anyone would go submerged as close to Norways populated mass as possible. Poeh yeah if anyone creeps up on ye like that, then ofcourse you rob them of having a homeland.

my thoughts as well. this is a bunch of thin and circumstancial evidence to argue for Russian aggression, and doesn't factor in the myriad of negative consequences the Russians would face if they were to go through with something so drastic. Besides, Russia has always done various shenanigans to test and poke at Norway. this is nothing new. I won't completely rule out a Russian move on Svalbard, but I'm not overly worried.

From another norwegian; have you not been paying attention? It's more than ten years ago that Vladimir Sjirinovski landed on Svalbard with a detachment of Spetznaz, and Russia has been escalating in various ways since. To say this is far from reality is just plain ignorant.

Remember back to January and early February with all the denials Ruzzia and many other countries had about them invading Ukraine ... Everyone thought it would be crazy for them to try and that it was just propaganda. Now, was it just propaganda?? They have been poking around Norway even longer, but being a part of NATO, Ruzzia has to do most behind the scenes, so the average Ruzzian is NOT AWARE they have been busy until Putler is caught and then cries they are attacking Ruzzian speaking people there and set their traps. Their point is to get away with as much as possible in secret and when caught, to cry wolf for their benefit. Of course BLAMING NATO/West. A lot of what Putler does is based on the US's Presidential election this fall. Do what he can in secret in the mean time until he knows whether or not if he will have USA and trump on his side ....

​@@jonnybanjo3424 The Spetznaz forces which have died on the front in Ukraine? I'm not really concerned about them. 😐

@@ivancho5854 Wow. You really think I'm talking about the specific company that was on Svalbard. Not too bright are you?

Imagine the alien archeologists finding out humanity destroyed itself in nuclear armageddon, because fucking Russia thought it a good idea to invade Svalbard. Maybe somebody should tell Putin he has all the cold wastelands he could ever want, the problem is that few enough intelligent people want to stay in Russia, particularly because of the mess he made of it. He would literally gain more power, resources, people, wealth, etc. everything really, if he didn't do any of the shit he has done and ruled as a benevolent dictator, let alone with a halfway democratic state underneath him, that might actually have a chance of not being entirely corrupt to the bone.

Besides, Trump is a womanizer and norwegian women are hot.

Slava Uranus

​@@lemdixon01 Ah, the average russian bot showing his cognitive level 🤡

@@jonnybanjo3424 ah the Russian bot conspiracy theory by 77th brigade when we're all here in the UK not wanting world war III with Russia. We are all sleeper cells 😆

@@lemdixon01 Not too bright are you?

@@jonnybanjo3424 well I've only got a degree in electronics. We can't all have a btec in gender studies qualification like your, no doubt what you army grunts are getting indoctrinated with now. But yeah I'm not too bright........cope harder.

And Norway has always Finland and Sweden as neighbours. They are not to play with. Finns are born to be warriors, Swedes are the technological superiors against Russia.

tell us please, how is russia losing the war? last i checked, they have been advancing for many many months now. slowly, but surely advancing. not retreating

@@in6587 Remember how Germany advanced as far as to Stalingrad? They lost the war as they lost the arms production race to the USA. Russia is losing for the same reason: economy.

@@sampohonkala4195 True they are in turmoil trying to rebuild and keep the models of yesterday running. Whilst the rest ov the world can continue its advancements.

@@sampohonkala4195 Германия с русскими и воевала.В Сталинграде погибли 2 румынские ,1 итальянская,1 венгерская армия и это все без немецких частей.пока норвегия трусливо сдалась за 2 месяца за это время в сталинграде немцы прошли еле-еле один дом .Так как же украина при полной мобилизации победит россию если там она не использует даже 2/10 все мобилизационного и технического ресурса.Просто интересно смелые европейцы)

What should it be a part of then?

@@in6587 What do you think?

@@elvenkind6072 crimea has been under russian control for 10 years. At this point crimea is part of russia. Whether it stays that way, time will tell. But right now, crimea is not part of ukraine

@@in6587 A good argument. Personally I'd rather call Crimea a contested area, since there's an active war, involving half the planet, where both Ukraine and Russia lay claim to the peninsula. Strictly according to "international law" and all that though, it's still part of Ukraine, and is under an "illegal occupation" by Russia, whom is the aggressor in this conflict. Hence why USA, Canada and most of NATO countries in Europe (edit: And Australia) actively support Ukraine, both formally with diplomacy, but also economically and militarily.

Yup. They're working very hard in Ukraine to do just that. ½ a million casualties so far for absolutely nothing. Complete and utter idiots. 😐 🇺🇦🇬🇧

Thats already happening, we have lots of NATO soldiers in Norway.

Just as we speak American soldiers transporting military equipment from Narvik to Finland.

@@daimendimenAnd we have an Apache group from the UK practicing here in Finland also.

@@BetalerIkkeSkattDu må betale skatt

RusBots are a sign that they fear the material; video, comment, blog, whatever. They don't like truth.

Can I just not be a bot of either side by not wanting to fuel a war with Russia ?

Yup, all the "Tylers" have been commandeered out to swarm this channel 😅 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9rZiD8Z0gHQ.html

Yup, predictably all the "Tylers" have been commandeered out to swarm this channel 😅

​@@kenster8270I'm just looking at videos of London and Birmingham and looks like it has already been invaded but not by Russia. So while we're funding a far away war we took our eye off what is going on at our own borders. But the politicians seem to want this and are not representing us so why should we support a war with Russia. At least Russia isn't doing to mass imigrantion and woke stuff.

You’re missing the point of what he’s explaining Russia is trying to do here. Also, timescales of events only look crazy in hindsight. At the times of their intentions they would have made more sense.

I agree. Russia is just barking. It might try to sabotage energy production in Norway however

No, it is not click bait, but many people, like the Ruzzian population among many others, are not aware of all of Ruzzia's actions. Watching this video makes me wonder why we are even entertaining the thought of Ruzzia invading Norway. It wont be a war that Norway has to fight alone, it will be NATO that Ruzzia is attacking. Can guarantee Ruzzia will NOT be annexing ANY NATO lands. They dont stand a chance no matter how you slice it.

😭😭💀💀

We are a welfare state first and foremost, built on community and the support of the people as a collective. Abruptly increasing our population to such a degree would tank our support systems, and wouldn't exactly be necessary either. Only concern in which it'd be relevant would be our elder wave, though that could be mitigated through more passive means. In terms of investments, that is something they already do, Norway own shares essentially within every branch of relevance, especially modern development, concentrating it into one branch would ultimately lead to the same instability that inspired the fund to begin with

Nothing Russia does makes sense.

Well Russia attacked Ukraine partly because natural resources in that Krim area.

I noticed you commented less than 5 minutes after upload on a 30 minute video, so you probably didn't notice that the video addressed all of these points :)

It can also make sense to attack for resources you've already got, to guarantee access to a larger share of the world market, for pricegouging reasons.

@@Phreno_Xeno When have you been at the city hall in Olso. Is nothing but :)

FYI, for all, I did a bit of Googling a while back about Incogni and discovered that Delete Me is better but slightly more pricey. However it specifically looks for your data first, instead of just sending out blanket remove request to all data brokers, even if they don't have your data _yet..._ (but now do thanks to Incogni's request). However, if you're outside America, Delete Me's even better, as it's got versions for a bunch of different individual countries. I'm Australian and looked at Incogni as it was being advertised everywhere, but it's not that good with our local laws. Google your own country and data broker removal. Then, decide for yourself.