Why peace in Bosnia is under threat | Start Here 

I agree, but they need to be prepaired.

Yes i agree with u

Freedom peace and Justice

They have their own internal conflicts. No unity. No solidarity.

What an odd comment. You're stating the obvious, are you not? Does someone support war in Bosnia-Herzegovina?

Perfect 👍

She made a lot of incorrect statements on this one.

simpin

I'm in Love

@@divljezivotinje6688 Nah

When you say Bosnia you mean Serbian old dukedom. The part where Serbs of 3 religions were formed as first it was occupied by Osman Turkish Empire and when Austria came to liberate it, some people prefered becoming muslim then being turned to Catholics, whole towns in some cases at 10 minutes on the squere would ask and be proclamed Muslim. After Austrian Empire came some were as expected made to turn to Catholics. And now in the last 30 years supported by west idea they are trying to make people of one nation divided in 3 religions orthodox, catholic and muslim into 3 nations. So, do you stand with Bosnia as you are sure you know its history and real issues or because news are telling you what they want you to see. There are no Bosniaks that is a made up word. There were always Bosnians as Serbs from dukedom of Bosnia, that in one period became Kingdom and was always Serbian. And plan to distroy Serbian territhory is on the go for 2000 years. As is a plan to destroy Russia. This is all fabricated by west as it was every time before. They still lead crussader wars under Gods name and you can see it as they allways say they "save a country" but only of problems they create for them, and then "save" that country of all natural recources.

@@hasepsut011 so the genocide was done from serbs to serbs. Ok 👌

@@skrskrskrr5033 👏👏👏 when you think you are a smart as# but you miss the smart part

@@hasepsut011 This all is a load of bullshit. Read actual books. If a country name Bosnia and Herzegovina is recognized, then it exists and there's that. You learning history from Seselj's book, because he clearly knows better than historians who lived at the times you specified, only makes you narrowminded. Your logic of "Bosnia is a Serb dukedom because once Bosnia was a part of Serbia" also then translates into "Serbia is a part of Turkey because Ottoman Empire once owned Serbia" or better yet "Austria owns Serbia now since Serbia was a part of Habsburg Empire once". Heck even Hungary and Italy can claim Serbia then.

@@hasepsut011 HAHAHAHA Anyone spreading megalomaniac Putins insane lies has lost any credibility! Are you another megalomaniac Serb obsessed with dominance and superiority Complexities? Remember the free world once bombed you evil creatures to peace, and can do it again!

Exactly! We should make wars illegal…. The people starting the wars need to box it out in a ring. Period!

@@artdefiesgravity8013 make wars illegal 😂😂😂😂😂

@@artdefiesgravity8013 How are you gonna enforce that smart one? wars are unfortunate but necessary.

@@Steven-gd6rl and who do you represent? The military industrial complex?

@@artdefiesgravity8013 Human history.

Serbian Kingdom Bosnia!!!

@@x-man4966 never gonna happen. Serbs been losers since ww1. Fight bosnia fight nato

@@x-man4966 ne moze cetnice , srbija nikad nije bosnom vladala a bosna je srbijom 2 puta ,serbia belegrade pashaluk breeeeeeeee

Mamlaz idiotski

@@OmexxDR Tvrtko je uzimao Nemanjićku krunu, turčine, aj lepo nazad u turkmenistan pa da konacno živimo u miru

@@f-86zoomer37 bro, this video was reporting about BiH only so there is no point to mention about Nato's bombardment in 1999 and Kosovo crisis. And notice that they also said atrocities had been made by all sides, so isn't it fair enough for you?

Who?

Really difficult to figureit out. The only difference is the religion.

If you need any explanation, I will try to be objective as much as I can. Greetings from BiH, Republika Srpska.

@@JeroenBIG nah they were different ethnicities even before religious divides. These issues even happened when Bosniaks were Christian, coming from a historical standpoint

The center of all issues is Serbian orthodox church that creates all problems. Next is Montenegro!

@@divljezivotinje6688 the issue isn’t a church it’s the nationalist mentality that Serbs have been pushed for generations to the point where they want to take over every country

Ethnic diversity never works

@@viveka2994 So you'd commit genocide again, to make sure there is none? What else is new.

@@libertas5005 I didn't commit any genocide, but diversity doesnt work, it's why most empires fall, ethnic tension, yugoslavia failed because of it, you aren't Yugoslav, so dont comment on it, you're likely American, a cultureless people

@@timasha2383 Every ethnicity should have their own nation, Bosnia should not exist, it should be split between Serbia and Croatia

@@timasha2383 Bosnia was a Serbian syate back then, BiH is 40 percent Bosniak, 37 Serbian, 10 percent Croat, so bosnia would lose over half its population if serbs and croats left. You blame serbs only for genociding, Bosnians killed more than we eved did, they blame Srebrenica on serbs, but it was really Bosnians who killed in that region, the region was Serbian majority, where did the Bosnians come from in that region?

Democracy is always the best. Old men cause wars!

yes, NATO & EU, also just work for their own interests, they answer to the US, who many times have proven rotten in many conflicts

@@bowerbird7463 u r very right

Because Bosnia is not a independent country, it's governed by the west. They write our laws and our constitution. Tomorrow if a referendum was held 99.9% of Serbs would like to seceede and the same goes for the Croats. The west sponosored the break up of Yugoslavia and I really don't know what they expected with Bosnia, that it would stay intact by force?

@@abc-eq9so "The west sponosored the break up of Yugoslavia" Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic dismantled Tito`s federal Yugoslavia by getting rid of the autonomy of Kosovo & Vojvodina. That caused the collapse of the old federal Yugoslavia . The West tried to save Yugoslavia but it was too late, after the Serbs started to kill people.

@@northernstar4811 Lol "after the serbs started to kill people" it wasnt Serbs that started to kill because it wasnt them who started to rebell against the state. Why would we start to kill if we were happy with the current state? You think we just woke up one morning and started killing or what? Regarding Milosevic, I don't really hold him as a favorite. He is just as responsible as Tudjman and the others. But please look at the timeline, Serbs did for sure not Start to kill anyone.

@@abc-eq9so I don't know properly but from a few sources, I found on the internet, I think that the west encouraged the breaking of Yugoslavia after marshall Tito died and the mess started.

@@abc-eq9so it wasn’t the Bosniaks nor the Croats that started the concentration camps in 92

onesided propaganda

@@goldenbreaker6260 Only liars and useful idiots of Serb and Croat fascism can say the war was fair and that 'all sides are equally guilty' which is a giant lie.

Because of the corruption USA is pushing in that country. Remember Ukraine under a regime-change strike since 2014 sponsored by NGOs from USA.

That she is!

Overwhelmed them? The Dutch crapped in their clogs!

Dont blame the west for Serbian ultranationalism and all the mass murder campaigns against civilians. All highest ranking military and political staff that created Republika Srpska were sentenced for war crimes. That tells you something about how and what they created.

@@heyyo162 Yeah Bosniak and Croatian commanders were sentenced for war crimes too.... That tells you something about how and what they created.

@@Spearca The strategic advantage is a stable west-friendly government, and not a mini-Syria in the middle of Europe.

@@VojvodaSloboda About 20 times more Serbs were sentenced for war crimes and the glaring difference today is that Bosniaks do not celebrate those criminals unlike most Serbs.

If by "western meddling" you mean Croatia, then sure.

@@bingusclub69funni Myanmar probably.

Hope Florida see this!

@@bingusclub69funni Greenland?

@@bonnierobinson8684 lmao nothing even remotely close to this is happening in Florida

If you don’t mind, what country are you speaking of?

Relatively recently most people in Montenegro declared Serbian church and language to be their native not Montenegrin. Government went against majority of the population and put a ban on mention of Serbian language in schools and is trying to convert Serbian church property into their own. It's a country where 45% of the people voted against independence of Montenegro.

Serbia and Montenegro don't wanna join the EU anymore... furthermore the EU-commission has declared they won't take in any more countries in the near future.

EU will be destroyed and Nato Serbs does not want EU.

The majority of the population there absolutely have not realized that endless wars caused by nationalism are stupid, what are you talking about? For God's sake, they paint murals of Mladic and have convicted war criminals come on national television to explain that Mladic is a victim.

@@tarik6990 Muslim are under dream that someone who fighted Islamic terrorists is terrorists.

It's not solid at all. I am from Bosnia and this is typicall simplified explanation of the situation. Dodik was never a problem when the west brought him to power. He was "the man of the hour" then. After 2008-2010 when they took away more and more rights that Republic of Srpska had whitin Bosnia he started to go against the same people that brought him there. Now all the sudden he is a problem. We Serbs in Bosnia in generall do not have an issue with living in Bosnia, but we don't want to see our rights being taken away year by year. You can only push a people so far. There is a reason why even Croatia is on Dodiks side in this mess. They are being treated even worse than us in Bosnia. And Bosniaks do as they want because they have the US backing them..

Right? Likely why Dodik "feels" the genocide denial law is unfair to Serbs...can't cover the truth if the lies are outlawed. War is atrocious, but it doesn't cover the facts: the 80% Bosniak civilians were massacred, that's a hefty number to be claiming "all sides".

Zased

Born in '99, can confirm that you can't go for long without hearing it mentioned.

@@dejangegic yeah, me in '98 and like every day on tv or otherwise you will hear it. I'm like HELLO do you see that cooking oil is 3times more expensive than a year ago

That is not quite true. She said 100,000 were killed and 80% were Bosniaks. In fact 61% od those 100,000 were Bosniaks.

@@makomaro collateral damage is an inevitable outcome of war, I don’t think I contested that in my comment, the question is the degree to which a community suffered the atrocities st the behest of the other, here its differs on the accord of 80% to 20%. The fact that 80% mostly were Bosniaks civilians only supports the one sidedness of the tipped over scale. No questions on that.

@@makomaro here’s another question 🙋‍♂️ 80% war casualties were Bosnians at the behest of Serbs and Dodik is also a Serb who’s enforcing this feat, anyone see’s a pattern?

Saying atrocities were committed from all sides is true but it is a not so subtle way of pretending that all sides were equally guilty which is a total lie and fabrication not supported by any tangible evidence.

Semi civilised you think

See the thing is, a secular federal government doesn't exist in this country.

Yes that is a problem in lebanon and iraq too

Or abolish ethnicities altogether, like what Rwanda did.

@@blissconnect_ Yes it does, it's in Sarajevo and Bosnia is a secular state.

@@tarik6990 still not federal, Croats don't have their federal unit

Yes

//But Jesus answered them, saying, “The hour has come that the Son of Man should be glorified. 24Most assuredly, I say to you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it produces much grain. 25He who loves his life will lose it, and he who hates his life in this world will keep it for eternal life. 26If anyone serves Me, let him follow Me; and where I am, there My servant will be also. If anyone serves Me, him My Father will honor. Jesus Predicts His Death on the Cross 27“Now My soul is troubled, and what shall I say? ‘Father, save Me from this hour’? But for this purpose I came to this hour. 28Father, glorify Your name.” Then a voice came from heaven, saying, “I have both glorified it and will glorify it again.” 29Therefore the people who stood by and heard it said that it had thundered. Others said, “An angel has spoken to Him.” 30Jesus answered and said, “This voice did not come because of Me, but for your sake. 31Now is the judgment of this world; now the ruler of this world will be cast out. 32And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all peoples to Myself.” 33This He said, signifying by what death He would die. 34The people answered Him, “We have heard from the law that the Christ remains forever; and how can You say, ‘The Son of Man must be lifted up’? Who is this Son of Man?” 35Then Jesus said to them, “A little while longer the light is with you. Walk while you have the light, lest darkness overtake you; he who walks in darkness does not know where he is going. 36While you have the light, believe in the light, that you may become sons of light.” These things Jesus spoke, and departed, and was hidden from them. Who Has Believed Our Report? 37But although He had done so many signs before them, they did not believe in Him, 38that the word of Isaiah the prophet might be fulfilled, which he spoke: “Lord, who has believed our report? And to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?” 39Therefore they could not believe, because Isaiah said again: 40“He has blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts, Lest they should see with their eyes, Lest they should understand with their hearts and turn, So that I should heal them.” 41These things Isaiah said when he saw His glory and spoke of Him. Walk in the Light 42Nevertheless even among the rulers many believed in Him, but because of the Pharisees they did not confess Him, lest they should be put out of the synagogue; 43for they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God. 44Then Jesus cried out and said, “He who believes in Me, believes not in Me but in Him who sent Me. 45And he who sees Me sees Him who sent Me. 46I have come as a light into the world, that whoever believes in Me should not abide in darkness. 47And if anyone hears My words and does not believe, I do not judge him; for I did not come to judge the world but to save the world. 48He who rejects Me, and does not receive My words, has that which judges him-the word that I have spoken will judge him in the last day. 49For I have not spoken on My own authority; but the Father who sent Me gave Me a command, what I should say and what I should speak. 50And I know that His command is everlasting life. Therefore, whatever I speak, just as the Father has told Me, so I speak.”

When you have Bosniaks in the federation marching with Allah Akbar chants, our Republic of Srpska military police will only get stronger. You trust me on that.

@@abc-eq9so There are no Bosniaks marching with Allahu Akbar chants, that's not a real thing. There is no culture of war crimes celebration among Bosniaks.

@@tarik6990 Are you sure :) I can surley show you plenty of material from even Bosniak sources.

@@abc-eq9so You will find independent cases of Bosniaks doing that but it's not a regular thing and there is no mass culture of crimes celebration among Bosniaks unlike among Serbs. When Bosniaks by the thousands come out in the streets of Sarajevo yelling Allahu Akbar and threatning Serbs with killings, feel free to contact me.

@@tarik6990 tell the truth we don't want tiqiya here.

6 were convicted in November 2017 for being part of a Croat joint criminal enterprise.

@@tarik6990 Milosevic was convicted too, what has changed?

@@kunzal1065 Nothing has changed, I don't recall saying anything about change in my initial comment.

Top comment

Who played stupid games?

That is not her. Kolinda is not the croatian president anymore. And croatian current president and pretty much the whole country is strictly against it

Croatia and Serbia are the best of friends when it comes to splitting Bosnia apart and planning to divide it among themselves so yes there is endorsement for serbian secession from croatian officials.

Croatia didn't want to divide you, Croats from B&H wanted autonomy. That's why they got rights in federation as a compromise while Serbs got autonomy as compromise.

...and they didn't have any support from Croatia. Right. You could say the same about Serbs. It was all on their own volition, without any backing from Serbia, both in Croatia and Bosnia.

Croatia never attacked BiH. Croatia and the HVO was responsible for the survival of BiH, just like Galbraith and Okun said. The muslim army attacked HVO first to gain territory they lost to the Serbs. Croatia didn't try to divide BiH because there is no logically consisted argument to prove these claims since Croats voted at BiH referendum, Croatia recognized BiH, HVO defended BiH and fought the VRS in 1992, Croatia armed and delivered uninterrupted humanitarian help, trained muslim soldiers, took in 500,000 refugees etc.

@@anteveic327 A lot of Croats want both an independent Croatia largely ethnically homogeneous and ethnically cleanse of its main pre-war ethnic minority + a Croatian ethno-state in another country on top of that. They forget that it doesn't work like that, nobody owes Croats anything let alone that much. Croatia plotted with Serbia through the Bosnian war, that's easily verifiable.

I understand the fact that tomorrow isn't promised to anyone, but investing today is a hard thing to do because I have no idea of how and where to invest in

as a newbie investing in crypto will be the best for you, I know of a portfolio / investment manager, William's Armstrong Trading services, an expertise in trade investment as you don't have to under go any stress in...

My first Investment with Expert William's Armstrong has earned me profits of over $24,320 us dollars and ever since then he has been delivering.

he's obviously the best i invested 2000 USD with him and in 9 days i made a profit of 9102 USD.

Same here I earn huge weekly profits of $10,000 on my Investment since I started trading with William's Armstrong he's trading strategies are top- notch.

massacre*

@@Spearca But that's my point even in English Croat and Croatian are synonymous. Croat/Croatian and Croatian national are not (Croat/Croatian is ethnicity and Croatian national is nationality), but she is not using that distinction. So the right term would be Bosnian Croats/Croatians and Croatian nationals/citizens. The problem is that she is using term Croat as of it only denotes ethnic Croats in Bosnia and Herzegovina, but in actuality it is also used for ethnic Croat citizens of Croatia.

@@Spearca Let's agree to disagree, but also since when is the ethnography for English people "Anglo"? It's English, for both nationality and ethnicity. I agree that Croat and Croatian are not complete synonyms just because Croatian has much wider meaning because it's also an adjective. But my whole point was that Croats in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina do not identify as different people as it was insinuated from this video. It seemed like "Croat" is a term only applicable to Bosnian Croats when it is also applicable to Croatian Croats.