Why the $42 Blue Ember Mic Beats $100 Mics 

Love your format. No nonsense, straight to facts. Youll be super successful being succinct like this. Keep it up

I bought this mic years ago when it was 100, and it's great for streaming and even seen people recording music on them, extremely worth getting at $42!

I appreciate your channel so much, simple, effective and competent content, it goes straight to the point, no frills. I would like videos on DACs/Amp/audio interface.

Thank you for your video brother, as a mic lover, its nice to see someone actually try to show me something that is in that $$$ range all the time :D

Another great pickup right now from Blue is that the Baby Bottles (SL) Half off holy crap

What are your thoughts on the Blue Ember vs the SM57? Love the videos!

Oh lord have mercy. First the xm8500 now the blue ember. lol. I like the ember a lot and for $42 I think it destroys everything else under what? $150?

Can you test out the AKG P420 with the relatively easy capacitor mod? People said its better value than the baifeilis and slightly comparable to the U87

Currently running a AT2035 i managed to snag for 60 bucks. Think that was a great deal, but the blue ember really does punch above its weight class

I am trying to decide between this and the Proar C414. Any thoughts? The Blue ember is now like $30 cheaper than the Proar C414

which would you go for between the blue ember, xm8500, or any other bang for buck xlr you'd recommend?

Better than Fifine k688 and Maono Pd200x?

opinions on the bluebird thats also on sale

would this blue ember mic be good at singing.....also compared to rode nt1-signature?

sound is low on my blue baby bottle mic have to turn the gain all the way up blue ember is better in my opinion less gain brighter sound crispy clean

proar c414 or blue ember is sound better