Why The Airbus A319neo Hasn’t Been Popular 

Wait till the A317neo comes out to replace the 76-100 seat regional market, and the A316neo to replace the 50-75 seat market.

The A318neo won’t happen, they already have the A220 for the 100-150 seats sector.

Wait until the a322neo!

@@nguyenhoangan-matt it a joke

@@antbotsquad6769 Airbus a323neo is better

This is the best answer to this video.

The Airbus A319neo is perfect for Danish Air Transport because Danish Air Transport is a scheduled and charter airline.

Didn't age well

Yup.. typo error

Thanks for the feedback! - TB

That proves how unpopular it is

Exactly

There was even a318

I did

Bruh, it's my favorite plane because it looks cute and small, the ceo version tho

@thatonesalami same

Stop reading my fucking mind!!!!

@@josearmandoguerrerochairez3454 aight then

@@TysonIke there is 737 max6

@@TysonIke yea ik 736 but there is also conning a 737 max 6

Correct and also A319neo is designed to compete with B737 Max 7 for hot and high airports like Denver Bogota. California SNA John Wayne

Yeah I love the looks of the A220

Spirit A319’s have the most uncomfortable seats I’ve experienced. But their prices are so much cheaper (on the routes that I fly) that it’s worth it to me. Occasionally Alaska is close in price and they are much more comfortable (A321 and 737-900) The A319 itself is fine and has always gotten me home. Cheers

I'm not fan of the 737-700/800.

Was looking for this comment and was surprised it wasn't mentioned in the video

Climbs like a stabbed rat.

The A220 is a much more pleasant ride.

the a320 and a321 arent the same size, when they stop making the a319, the power will go into the newer a220 family

Don't forget the A319s ability to take standard containers

as of 2018, the list price of the a319neo is $101.5 million, the a220-300 costs $91.5 mil. so ye, the a223 is $10m cheaper. also, what airline do u work for?

@@airbus_a320neo gotcha. I guess 10 mil would be a easy deciding factor. I fly with F9.

The A319 is 8,000 kilos heavier. It also has more powerful engines and a higher fuel burn...not to mention the fact it costs over $10 million more.

the max 7 isn't a shrink if you think about it

Yeah, they have similar fuel burn to A320neo. Why would most airlines want to buy it.

Meanwhile the clean sheet CSeries/A220 cannot be manufactured fast enough to meet demand.

@@AirShark95 sadly

the A380 and the 747 aren't successful because they're too big and they're quadjets

@@airbus_a320neo yeah

@@AirShark95 Neither can the A320neo and A321neo family

Absolutely. That’s why you have not heard much from Airbus about the 500. It’s so much more profitable program to 320. 220 is a loss leader with very low production.

I would say so. I personally would say the future of the A32x family lies in the A321, specially the LR and XLR variants as they are primed to fill the void left by the departure of the 757, and to help airlines recover in a post COVID market. The A220 is a superior aircraft, and A220-500 could (on paper) out perform the A320neo on quite a few parameters. The A220 could become Airbus' new narrowbody platform for the foreseeable future while the A321 compliments it on the higher capacity narrowbody market.

No, the A220-500 wont cannibalize sales from the A320neo

You should see the information of sfecification about A320neo family on Wikipedia,it Will be clear .

None were purchased new by AA. Most came from US Airways (and most of US’s A319’s were former America West birds if I recall). However, around 2019 they picked up a ton of USED A319’s from FRONTIER 😂 (F9 had replaced the A319 with A320neos, and AA likely picked up the fleet on-the-cheap)

Yeng Sabio not anymore. They’ve all been sold to Allegiant. By 2024 most of Cebu Pacific’s fleet will be composed of A321neo.

@@tarmacpounder785 Since when their A319s were sold?

Yeng Sabio last one left the fleet in 2019, IIRC.

@@tarmacpounder785 Copy that! Great update, eh mate!

Good question. Full service airlines DL to replace their 737-732s if needed UA replace part of their 737-724s.

You think Because it colour ?

The 319 is less efficient and over $10 million more expensive. The A220 has a larger seat pitch and is more comfortable.

@@charlesharper2357 I like being proven correct!

Don't believe at all in retirement of wide body, do you imagine how many parking spot you'll need for the same amount of people traveling

@@plamantin2937 I didn't say widebodies will be retired completely. But except for super long hauls, I think most of them will be. Hub and spoke has gone the way of the dodo. The vast majority of flights can now be flown point to point, which means regional are going to get a second life. Narrowbodies can handle point to point just fine, even on a lot of long haul flights, like, say, JFK-LHR. They're already equipping some narrowbodies with lieflats for just such trips. But I believe the pandemic has killed business class as surely as it killed the 747, the 380, and most of the widebodies. As much as I'd like to see the numbers in the sky go back to pre pandemic levels, I don't think it will happen. I'm not being negative; I'm being pragmatic. Thanks to apps like Zoom and WhatsApp, businesses aren't gonna want to cough up for business trips anymore unless they absolutely have to. I just hope that leisure travel picks up. My leisure travel list is very long, because I've been grounded due to illness for too damn long! I want to get out and travel, and for me, my mode of transportation is plane! I love to fly. Plus, Delta's been nagging me with great deals I haven been able to take advantage of, darn it all!

@@ecclestonsangel I don't think the super efficient widebodies like the Boeing 787 Dream)Liner, Airbus A350 XWB are going anywhere anytime soon, the B787 was designed as a point to point aircraft. When Boeing designed the Dreamliner, they believed that point to point would be the future and it turns out they were spot on. Experts are saying it'll take 4-5 years for the number of people flying to get back to pre pandemic levels, which seems realistic to me. I think narrowbodies are an awful idea for long haul, compared to a widebody, their cabins are really cramped, for a short to medium haul flight their cabin space is perfectly fine and comfortable, but can you imagine doing a 10+ hour flight on a B737 or A320? Especially for tall people like myself. On long haul flights they recommend people get up and walk around occasionally throughout the flight to stop DVT, but you couldn't do that on a narrowbody because there simply isn't enough cabin space. I have a feeling that if narrowbodies started doing long haul, the cost of a flight would rise because the cabin would fit less passengers in long haul configuration to allow the standard long haul seat pitch of 31-34".

I did

I dont think there will ever be an A318neo

@@shahimagesyt duh thats why they havent made it

The A318 has been discontinued, unfortunately.

Just like the 175-E2 that was offered and no one bought.

and I do think that orders will pick up

I seriously hope Airbus doesn't do this. The A220 was designed to fit in between the sizes of regional jets and the larger single aisle jets built by Airbus and Boeing (A320 and 737). Its intended role is quite different to the A320neo's intended role and so forcing it into the role of the A320neo is just a bad idea

With so many common parts it doesn't really cost much to keep offering it despite the low sales. It makes sense to keep a fleet all the same type instead of adding a new model in.

More importantly the 319 is built on the same line as the more popular 320s.

When you start your sentence with: "According to Wikipedia"...

No A318NEO

The whole A318 thing doesn't make sense anymore with the A220 around, that's why it's being discontinued

It sold even less as the "A318ceo". Airbus didn't bother to invest more on it and it has been gone for a long time.

Unlikely with how good A220 is

@@filledwithvariousknowledge1065 No hes right, when airlines need to replace their a319 ceos theyll probably order this if they want a plane of this size due to retraining pilots. Same story for the a330-800 neo. Airbus has made sure that any airlines who want to replace theyre a319 ceos earlier than expected will have the option of the new aircraft, and not look elsewhere or have to wait.

@@MarcusNesbitt4 No probably not the trend is to upsize

Air India is never a good reference for an aircraft

Donot judge book by its cover. Cabin appearance is not that much good . But rest 💪💪💪💪

No that won’t happen

dont just dont

@@Lee247Jamaica wowww

Wow

lee247 was first, next time bud

@@sloanestreetaddict2954 thx

Congrats on being first!

Mr yeeet boi

@@mgsaviation9292 maybe i should change my name to it

@@sloanestreetaddict2954 thx

@@Lee247Jamaica good decision

Eh personally I'd say the A220 is primed to take that title. It's a true next-generation airliner and offers performance and efficiency that not even the neos or MAXs can reach.

lmao no

yes it is.

Almost 4 percent more efficient

Yep !👍🏻👍🏻

BOEING GANG RISE