Why Transparent Solar Panels Are The Future 

Poor sun angle, dont work at night or under clouds. 60% of the building is in shade. Big money for suppliers, 25% efficiency max. I dont think it would provide $$$hit to power a huge building . 60% are ENTIRLY USELESS ALL THE TIME. Whatta joke. Is this another ELONMUSH INVENTION?

Tell me please how AC damage ozone( layer?) ?

@@fladave99 well whats cool now a days is the ability to store solar energy in batteries which weren’t capable a decade ago, the idea is we just keep storing

@@xnxxpurplebitch Grids MUST be at a balance at all times. So while you are charging a massive battery the grid has to take that power from somewhere else OR has to have INCREASED power generation. You need to look up national power grid balancing. So power goes out and the batteries last a few days. WHY DID THE POWER GO OUT? That money should go to FIXING THE GRID or INCREASING POWER CAPACITY. That is why CALIFORNIA is the largest renewable power system in the country while at the same time its is the LARGEST IMPORTER OF COAL ELECTRIC POWER in the USA and also has the WORST GRID RELIABILITY. THESE ARE FACTS. Batteries in the grid will only produce MORE UNRELIABILITY because the money going into the green power should be going into grid maintenance and guess what, i Idiots will see that UNRELIABILITY as a way to lobby for MORE BATTERIES and continued grid failure. What does Cali CONTINUE to blame power outages for UNRELIABLE GRID and calls for MORE GREEN ENERGY which forces MORE IMPORTATION OF COAL POWER from other states which causes the HIGHEST PRICES IN THE NATION The Texas grid failue that created $10,000 power bils was because WASHINGTON would not allow that Texas coal plants to be fired up as a backup source. Stop living in a FAIRY TALE FANTASY WORLD. Because Batteries are for toys. COAL is for ENERGY. REALITY - You cannot argue

Guess you can call then solar powered sun glasses 😆

Do u know what is the organic salt used there?

Can you make a LED light glass out of see-through solar make see-through solar panel light bulbs like take some see-through solar panels and make a light bulb and do the same thing with LED lights

Ahhh, this was Techvision? I was wondering when did I subbed to VISION. But yeah, the narrator’s voice is what I recognize too

If the channel name and narrator’s voice changed at the same time, probably I would be wondering when I subscribed to this channel and would curse at RU-vid quite a bit.

same!

Probably because way too many crypto scammers and way too many fake accounts using his name to scam people in the comment section.

Another possibility is that some of his videos were, according to the comments, were not accurate. Maybe explaining the like-dislike ratio for some of them.

yes but u can also use live caption if u r using chrome

Right !

would they be able to be transparent enough and collect enough energy to run a car? and what about a crash, would it shatter?

It's all fun and games until the next mega-volcano blots out the sun for years like it did in the 1900's

@@johncampbell829 1815. The largest eruption for 750 years. It blocked sunlight for 1 year over north-east US and western Europe. It caused extreme hardship for the people in those regions, of course. One would hope that in the futuristic world in which we live we'd be better able to cope with such. The next in line was around the years 945, 535, 1159BCE... It's theorised that a warmer world enables larger volcanic eruptions or perhaps more accurately that colder (glacial) climates subdue them and less-cold climates effect on subduing them decreases. We're in much greater danger of good ol' war & famine in places that have traditionally been immune to conflict or disruption. If you're determined to search for dark clouds... I can't think of anything more likely or disruptive than resource insecurity (primarily fresh water) and the increasing wealth-inequality (and thereby social instability) that goes along with a scarcity of core resources. None of that inherently decreases the value or performance of solar cells; The availability of functional, affordable and prevalent solar energy might be key in mitigating the worst of such things.

Poor sun angle, dont work at night or under clouds. 60% of the building is in shade all the time. Big money for suppliers, 25% efficiency max. I dont think it would provide much power for a huge building as compared initial cost vs public utilities with large spans of solar adjusting shared infrastructure and power generation. .

Wait for another 10 years

What a negative attitude... its in development, you may as well be dead before it reaches peoples homes lol be happy the future looks better

@@BuzzKora yeah but that all depends on the footprint cause by production of the product as well. kinda like when everyone was on the electric car kick to reduce emissions, without really reading into how their car was powered and the waste product produced to build said car. nowadays its not so bad but back in the early days everyone jumped on the boat before doing any reading.

@@BuzzKora I didn't intend for my comment to sound negative. I'm very excited about the technology behind it and look forward to using it when it becomes available and within my ability to afford it. In the meantime, I am tracking other technologies as well.

@@XiloTheOdd There has never been a form of transportation that didn't leave a profound environmental footprint, even horses and wagons decimated large areas or land and left massive areas of waste in their trail. No manmade vehicle. whether electric or gas can tout no footprint. However, we can make ones that are less impactful than previous versions in time and with a lot more research and development. I believe electric vehicles have numerous downsides but that they are still far less impactful than gas-powered cars. I've been following both the better part of my life and more needs to be done, but at least we're heading in the right direction. In my opinion of course.

Yes my friend... we at Canamera reashurch and development ... been working on this since 2008... and my opinion only.... OK ... were well on our way to this being everyday technology ... my opinion only...

Lmao. I'm in a dark ass room this was in my recommendation too

Few days back, i really thought about this .. How much it will benefit if the solar panels could be transparent.

@@CarreyOn2.0 so YT can read your mind also!! 🤣🥳

Paying*

feels bad hearing thiis, but you're mayby correct.

BULLSHIT

Yeah, sure, thats the fucking spirit!

Its left the lab clearvue technologies

Its will never be stable. Solar and wind are collecting energy just 30% of its time. Its innaficient. Nuclear is way better. Plus solar is unrecyclable.

the video said if every window in the US were converted, it would provide 40%. Of course that's assuming none of them are shaded, nobody builds a bigger building right in front of you, you keep them relatively clean, cloudy days cease to exist. So many reasons why this isn't financially feasible and just can't provide any significant portion of the worlds power needs.

False

Welp lil dude, when you have ideas like that I guess it's time to explore and research ways on how they would work, if you do that you will probably have a solid project in the future, that's gonna help you a lot.

@@Aztekaspia yes u are 100% true 😄😄

Open minds are a win win...

What is the salt used ?

@@sushmaranjini5636 I'm not sure what you are referring to, but I think you are asking what the salt is used for within the solar cells. If you go to the part in the video at 1:00 minute you will hear them speak about how organic salts are used in solar cells. My thinking, regarding my previous comment, is that if salt is used in the making of solar cells that maybe they could use the brine left over from desalination factories so that we can help reduce the waste products left over from them. I have no idea if that is feasible, but thought that it may be something to look into so that we are not only able to make more solar cell windows but also help reduce an unrelated problem such as brine waste.

Haha I noticed all of them and thought of writing a comment but saw it was put up already. You missed this one though 4:46 "See right through them"

@@engineeredarmy1152 ooh good one :)

Because transparent solar panels are not real and this channel is spreading nonsense.

@@matthijskkr what are you smoking bro?

@@EmielWauters I should ask you that because you're believing this shit.

@@EmielWauters 10% eff + glass is vertical which will further decrease direct sun light and decreased eff, if the cost is low enough (which is not) then maybe it will be implemented

🙄

im guessing it probably depends on how willing you are to leave wires exposed in the interior

There is only so much solar energy per sq. meter at any given Latitude. So far the efficiency of most affordable solar PV is around 20 %. That % is getting better but slowly. But there are huge areas of the earth's land surface that are unusable and pretty much barren. Example: lets say a solar PV "farm" of 200 sq. miles , that is 10 x 20 miles, were installed in north Nevada, USA. And lets assume that 1/2 of that area is solar panels or 100 sq. miles. A facility like that would be a tiny fraction of the land area there and no one would even see it. Such a solar plant could generate enough power to supply a large portion of the West coast of the USA. Several of these scattered across the country would provide over 50 % of our energy needs.

We could cover a small section of the Sahara Desert, and make enough energy to provide the whole world with an abundance. But, it would cost alot, they would have to be self cleaning, and it would require global effort

Wind power is better for the majority of the electricity generated and solar panels are good for roofs

no, u cant

Much less expensive, much easier, and much more efficient to put solar panels on your roof. But in the city, and especially in new buildings, this could make a big difference.

@@terrysullivan1992 perfect for apartment windows for those that do not have a roof

Good questions. Poor sun angle, dont work at night or under clouds. 60% of the building is in shade all the time. Big money for suppliers, 25% efficiency max. I dont think it would provide much power for a huge building as compared initial cost vs public utilities with large spans of solar adjusting shared infrastructure and power generation. .

I Love

Yeah, ofcourse, just make it. Thanks for this genius idea.

Maybe its a scam, bruh

Transparent solar cells only harvest the infrared or Ultraviolet potion of solar spectrum.

@@jerryli5555 Both, right?

Ad

mars wont have Windows u stupid, not ones facing the sun

@@autosneak1618 I said this *can* be used not will be