Why Was Crossdressing Illegal? 

In India too.

but they are then crossdressing? hmm..

Exactly, that's the origin of the word drag=dressed as a girl.

@@victoriaalbastra6325 Oh wow, never made that connection, thanks! 🙂👍

I read somewhere that for some time women weren’t even allowed to attend the theater where the piece was being performed. That sounds like an exaggeration but who knows…

It's not the fabric, it's the symbolism attached to it. And it's understandable.

no Kyjo...its just fabric

Not like anyone every used it for something like germ warfare or anything .... specifically smallpox in blankets~ -_-

my opinions are facts It doesn't take much to challenge some people's world views, and they really hate that.

kyjo72682 No, it's not understandable. It's nobody else's business how you dress. People need to learn how to mind their own business and let other people live their own lives.

I agree

Although I dont think guys can control weather they're attracted or not

Guys can't control what they are attracted to, but they can however, control themselves in treating a girl properly.

@@dianac.9648 I can't control if I'm attracted to someone, but I sure as hell can control my actions based on that attraction. "They were hot" is NEVER a valid excuse for sexual harassment/assault.

@@screamingweevil3410 I know, I'm against the dress code, I'm just saying this shouldn't be blamed on guys but the school or district.

A person of culture who also sleeps naked

In today's society, true.

@@FernandoTorrera Digital High-Five ヽ(○｀･v･)人(･v･´●)ﾉ

I am wearing panties, a guy

idraote well said sir

I have had 2 jobs where I all the female employees where given a set of approved make-up as part of the uniform and had to go to a make-up and hair lesson (only certain hairstyles arroved of course) as part of our training. On both occasions the guys just had to turn up neat and clean for the shift following what i would consider 'normal' appearnce rules for work, it was stupid.

idraote I relate to this. I used to work for a burger chain that started in the 40’s. And the founding family was conservative and Christian, so the dress code regulations were insanely strict (I’d constantly get in trouble for things like colored makeup, only nude was really allowed. I wore red lipstick one time and even though it matched the uniform, my manager complimented the color immediately before telling me to remove it. The male employees would have to shave in the locker room, even if it was just a 5 o’clock shadow. Your white pants had to be pristine, white crew cut socks only, women had to wear their hair secured entirely under a hat, held by a myriad of body pins and a headband. This was literally required. Also girls would have to clip their nails and remove nail polish in the break room if they weren’t bare and short. My nails were shiny from a nail growth treatment, not even polish, and I almost got in trouble for it ‘cause it “didn’t look natural”. Also no tattoos, piercings, or unnatural hair. I mean if you weren’t caucasian and had blonde or red hair you ran the risk of getting in trouble. Also for anyone if the red was too bright or the blonde was too white. And forget rainbow hair and interesting ombrés for sure. Extreme dress codes are ridiculous..

@@zombelladonna That sounds like my high school

I love "equal minded" guys!

She was awarded the Medal of Honor, it is not something you win, like a prize at the carnival.

Melanie Clark Thank you for pointing that out. Indeed you are right and I stand corrected. It was most certainly not my intent to trivialize the nature and gravity of the Congressional Medal of Honor. Mea culpa! I'll do better in the future. Another interesting fact: the government rescinded her Medal not too long after the end of the Civil War. However, she refused to return it and wore it until she died. In 1977, President Jimmy Carter reinstated her Medal of Honor. She remains the only woman to have ever been awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor.

Thank you I admire you and you are correct about Dr Walker. But it is Medal of Honor. Congressional is found nowhere in the title. Common misconception.

It's awarded by congress, therefore Congressional Medal of Honor is correct.

isoldam: No, it isn't. Look it up. www.army.mil/medalofhonor/

WOAH omg women freedom!

About then in my school too, except we had to wait for the bus at -40 F!

birdsdaword I remember it was below zero outside and us girls were forced to go out and play during recess. One girl wore a pair of pants to school and was told to take them off or go home. She went home. She came to school the next day and said her mother told her to tell all the girls to come to school in pants. Most of us did, then all of us did. The following year none of us wore dresses. It was lovely.😁

birdsdaword most schools in my country require uniforms so it not having the greatest time

In the 60's too i guess, and mini skirts too. The 50's were still very conservative tho omg

Then change your wardrobe, and by doing so change your society. Inspire future generations by being something greater than what was expected of you. Be so cute it melts their hatred and dissolves their ignorance, and through your courage make others feel safer to be themselves as well.

Cultural norms, tradition, law. Yes, almost every piece of clothing has at one time or another or in one place or another been used by male or female, but not in the same time, space, and people. U.S. American men do not wear thawbs, in the past, and conceivably, not anytime soon in a general sense. Make it a bit "masculine" in an American male's eyes and I would argue you have a duster (coat) or possibly capes You could almost say all clothing is variations on a lion cloth and/or a simply tunic and a girdle/belt

A language where everything has a gender is the only appropriate answer.

By practicality (it fits a body type), and by customs and traditions which evolved based on it.

dudes 100% use to wear tights with bows. Please just be cute.

Some day my friend, some day

It is possible.

@@fuzzytheduck6821 where can we learn such secrets ? ( Not from a jedi ).

I hate to break your dreams, but, that would only be possible if one obtained another’s lightsaber. “Bleeding” a Crystal to make it red in Star Wars can only be done by focusing on pure hatred and other negative emotions. And “grey Jedi” (as far as I know) are mostly know to wield white/grey lightsabers. Though Darth Revan was know to wield a purple lightsaber and he was a “grey Jedi” at one point. Though your comment might have been a joke seeing as the rules are (mostly) well know.

@@Nicholas32906 Heyyy a lore-based response! I think the original comment was referring more to the idea that color does not necessarily denote intention, some good people like red and some “bad” people like blue/green. But yes, according to the original cannon, that’s not really how lightsabers work,... I once saw a kid’s show, and they had two princesses, one was good, and the other was an evil imposter, and in order to differentiate them visually to the viewers, the original one had brown eyes, and the evil one had green eyes.,, I have green eyes,,. I was so triggered... 😂

Ikr

I agree. You can hear the energy in her voice.

I like it

This- also I really wish they'd brought up a bit more about how these laws specifically effected and continue to effect transgender people by grouping our existence in with sex crimes and "indecency" in law though that's probably a whole other video by itself I just think there's a parallel to be drawn with how lot of anti-trans/ transphobic people want to be able to tell what genitals someone has by looking at them and see that as being their right in a similar way as the upper class saw it as their right to "be able to tell with one look who is below me" . Controlling what people wear has always been about oppressing marginalised groups- Terfs today will attack gay and gender non conforming cis women or women of colour who they deem as "not feminine enough" and claim that they are trans women using dehumanising and objectifying language.

I remember when I was working in retail when I woukd be constantly asked "what I was" because people couldn't tell what my ethnicity was just by looking at me. If I gave the "wrong" answer then they might have treated me like garbage. I always answered a martian from Mars just to give them an idea of how stupid that question is. Though I was always treated like garbage if I said no to any of the demands.

so,,, kind of like middle and high school,, kids can be mean~

psychopaths could completely take advantage of this system...

Look into old Ireland. Everyone had to wear a different color based on their class/job.

because society.

Well things change 🤷 that's how time works

And a second and important question why are they the norm. And I once heart about a matrialchat society (in China) were in theory the female could steel with every man but they usualy stay whith one (But maybe i have the mandela effect or something and i am wrong about it).

@@alexandrub8786 Patriarchal societies are the norm because they're better If a patriarchal nation goes to war with a matriarchal one,they all ways win

Hodensaunee & Tibetan for two.

@Constantine V Agreed, that's why the Amazons were so weak and helpless against male centered warfare that they achieved mythical status for being incapable of military combat.

Who will win as a commander? Which will get stuff done? Matriarchs never did control much except cultural honorary titles. Commanders and leaders in direct control of projects were always men

I'm against both. All school dress codes ever did, was make me feel punished for being born a girl. They need to be re-evaluated.

@@ayanna6327 The dress code for my work basically punishes mostly women and I work in a factory that can get over 100 degrees, but we're not aloud tank tops. Let's say I was sweating all day then my shirt sags funny then you see my bra strap just peeking out near my neck (I wear it cross back for better support). Doesn't matter if I'm dying from heat stroke, just as long as I'm covered up. It mostly effects the women who are very busty.

It makes no sense

But it's not known for sure, it could be both

That is true men cant wear the opiset since clothing still holds a status and womens clothing is seen inferior in some way.

Ahh, the church of women worsting. "Men are shamed if they wear women's clothing because men see women's clothing as inferior" Aka, men hurt men because they hate women, and that hurts women most! Such idiocy.

@@rainynight02 eh, I've actually heard someone use that argument. "do you really want to look like a weak little girl?" sooo... It's not always the case but it is used as reasoning. My church believes that both women wearing pants and men wearing dresses is equally as shameful though so I wasn't raised with that mindset. I really don't care what other people wear.

Yeah well, in society only girls and women can get gender equality, rights, liberation, individuality. And, the biggest obstacle to men's would be ironically other men.

Boys get raised to suppress their girly, and feminine, sides. For instance girls can usually have long or short hair, but boys only short.

Great video, btw! I was always curious as to how these laws came about.

Excelent point, agree with each word. Hope Danielle would add this point in the end of her next video.

I think the thing with Dr. Barry was it was a woman who wanted to be a doctor, but had to pretend to be a man in order to practice.

Or... we can just call them women or men until we know for sure that they identified as something else. I am a butch lesbian. I dress in mostly men's clothes. I am a woman for all intents and purposes, address me as such because I have not made it clear that I am trans. Stop trying to force society to change the way it views sex and gender. If it changes, it will only do so naturally and over time with wide spread consensus.

@T Mystery Do you also want other people to assume you're straight? Clothing is definitively no proof for your sexuality either. I mean, as a butch lesbian you don't experience the same invisibility as a femme lesbian or a bisexual person... but maybe you remember being invisible from the time before you came out. Asking can get annoying but it is always better than putting all the burden of coming out again and again on the person themself. No offense (I love butches) but I don't want to turn into a walking stereotype to show people how gay I am. I love skirts, makeup and girly things - and I should not be required to wear rainbow wristbands or gay-themed t-shirts to remind people that not everyone's cishet.

More like Re-implemented?

Totally agree. I love dressing in more masculine sporty baggy clothes. I hate wearing dresses and high heels.

Men's clothing also has bigger pockets!

@@ChrisDragon531 Agreed! I was poking around a thrift store last month and tried on women’s pants for the first time in years. While I found several pairs that fit, they ALL flunked the “pocket test” when the pockets wouldn’t even hold my wallet! I don’t carry a purse (it’s just one more thing I need to worry about getting lost, stolen, forgotten, or robbed), so having pockets that actually hold things is Of Vital Importance. And WTF is up with that stupid denim/spandex fabric mix? One PMS “fat day,” and you’re popping seams! I’ve been wearing men’s jeans in winter and military summer pants in summer for precisely those reasons. First off, it’s easier to find pants that fit when you only need the waist and inseam to go by. Women’s pants designers keep changing the sizes so that what’s a size 8 one year is a size 12 the next, and for some idiot reason they’re under the delusion that if you’re a double-digit size then you must also have legs up to your ears. I’m a woman with a “mom body” combined with a height on the shirt side of average-you just TRY finding women’s pants (or even formal dresses, for that matter!) that fit that combo without shelling out more money on major alterations! Second, the aforementioned denim/spandex combination fabric in women’s jeans. You’re lucky if that stuff lasts six months! Don’t these idiots realize that the second part of the compound word “housework” is WORK? Sheesh, we work harder than men because we do paid work for a living, then we have a crap ton of work to do once we get home too! Men’s pants last me for YEARS because they’re 100% denim! That fabric was built to take abuse! Third, the cost. I can find men’s jeans and slacks in my size, and I’m only out $11 a pair. Women’s pants prices? Try $20 a pair at the MINIMUM. Okay, maybe closer to $15 at Walmart, but that’s still $4 more bucks that I shouldn’t have to shell out for pants that don’t have decent pockets, last a fraction of the time that men’s pants do, and they keep changing the sizes on. Screw that! And for the record, the last time I wore a dress was on my wedding day over 22 years ago. I hate dresses. They’re way more confining than pants because you have to watch how you walk, stand, or even sit in one, you gotta worry about up skirting a$$holes getting all pervy around you, it’s easier to be raped in a dress or a skirt, and nine times out of ten they don’t have pockets! The fact that I’m shaped like a feed sack doesn’t help either. You can put whatever decorations on it you want and make it whatever color you want-a feed sack is still a feed sack. In other words, it makes me look like Mama Duggar. YUCK!

Y W The channel is relatively new… RU-vid's algorithm is stupid and slow so one has to give it time. 😀 I might not have known about it if it weren't for some recommendation on a sister channel or some other sort of organic process. 🤔

Yeah...I think I only heard about it the same way pixelized did--from a reccommendation off to the side of a sister-channel's video. In my case I think it was It's Okay To Be Smart? or possibly Eons. One of those.(Of course, I'd also say that people should be watching ALL of those three! :))

Robin Chesterfield In my case it might have been through a recommendation from The Art Assignment.🤔 Until RU-vid gets with the program so to say, I guess it's up to us "squishy things" to promote good content…

Y W It's growing quite fast. I think it will continue to grow. we just have to continue to support!

Eric Barnes It sure deserves that growth and, yeah, we can keep sharing, liking and interacting… the kind of stuff RU-vid's algorithm likes. 😉

Same but in femboy

Same😔

Same here!

Nah you wouldn’t have broken the rules during that time

Thank you for bringing this up.

that confused me as well, because my brain skipped to the roman senate. then when she said it roughly translates to "controlling women" i was like... no. it roughly translates to council of old men.

This topic is so intresting there is a book by Kate Moor I suggest you read

theres a show on them now! its really good.

As long as it proper. You just can't let people roaming around in their underwear.

Or men's

During the past 100 years skirt length changed with the economy: strong economy - short skirts, weak economy - long(er) skirts. Unless it’s in a religious extremist environment where women are always blamed for men who can’t control their sexual urges.

I love to crossdressing n can't imagine being arrested for ti to.

Last time I checked the Romans didn't take much influence from the Hebrews.

What tribe was that, Neen? Yes, God told the Israelites not to partake of the practices of the nations He would drive out before His people, but He also made it clear that certain practices IN THEMSELVES were abominations to Him. That other tribes did it is irrelevant. God gave His people the Mosaic Law for them to follow. He did not give it to the Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, Babylonians, Persians, Arabs, Chinese, Indians, et al. Go back & read Exodus through Deuteronomy. And think: What difference would it make that other tribes were committing evil acts? To God, they were evil acts & worthy of destruction, period. God is not influenced by man. Other way around, Neen.

There's more than just an aesthetic to it though: when we compare the Command for a man to not wear a woman's garment (and vice versa: a woman not to wear a man's garment), and we see it's being called abomination in the same way a lying mouth is considered an abomination, one realizes it's a deeply moral issue: to not deceive (lie) about what He, as our Creator, made us to be and function as, as His human creation, and to not lie about it by the way we dress (express and identify ourselves to others), lying about what He created us to be. The verses to compare: • _Deuteronomy 22:5 (KJV)_ 5 _The_ *woman* _shall not_ *wear that which pertaineth unto a man,* _neither shall_ *a man put on a woman's garment:* _for all that do so are_ *abomination* _unto the Lord thy God._ • _Proverbs __6:16__-17 (KJV)_ 16 _These six things doth the Lord hate:_ _yea,_ _seven are_ *an abomination* _unto him:_ 17 _A proud look,_ *a lying tongue,* _and hands that shed innocent blood,_ In Jesus' day, both men and women wore robes, but there was still a difference in the way they wore it; so, it's up to the society to decide how they preserve this biological difference by their style of dress (whether everyone wears robes or everyone wears pants). Interesting tid bit: clothing wasn't mere fashion: it would tell a lot about a person (e.g. are they widowed? are they single? are they married? and yes including, are they a man or a woman?) and helped prevent inappropriate sexual advances to other people. And knowing He is a God of order, this does help facilitate smooth, orderly interaction in society (as opposed to chaos/confusion). • _1 Corinthians __14:33__ (NIV)_ 33 _For God is not a God of disorder but of peace-as in all the congregations of the Lord’s people._ Peace be with you. ♡

But are they technically crossdressing at that point? They are wearing clothing that corresponds to their gender 🤔

I like the idea of uniforms bc it's allot cheaper to dress a kid in a uniform. You don't have to worry about what the other kids are wearing and if your clothing will help you fit in. When I was in school, my father bought our school clothes from the dollar stores. I was embarrassed that I didn't have fashionable clothing so I got a job and got my clothing from thrift stores. I did not and do not appreciate that lesson. BTW he had the money, he just did not want to spend it on my mothers' children she had with him.

I don't mind uniforms in general, I do mind that dress codes are used to punish girls for having shoulders (yes, really, google it) and wearing shorts. Because those sexy, sexy shoulders on the 13 year old girl are soooo sexy that they will distract the boys from learning. So girls get pulled out of classrooms, which does not distract the girls from learning of course, to check their clothing and make them wear something else. Boys meanwhile have like one rule to follow. Make uniforms simpler and unisex, problem solved. Workplace dress codes sometimes require women to wear heels, which are cause long term and sometimes permanent damage to the feet, legs and back. I don't think many workplaces would require men to wear an item of clothing that would cause damage just by wearing it.

ties

Lesbian Amazon Sister found the terf. Anyway please stop ciswashing history. He lived as a man in both his public and private life and requested to be buried as one after he died.

Misha Toor Most historians don't like attributing modern terminology onto historical figures. Sometimes they will say things like, same sex attraction or gender nonconforming, because we often can't know for sure how these people felt.

While I agree that there is a significant chance Dr Barry was trans, there is also a big chance they weren't. We simply don't know for sure, and I would agree that just pretending trans people didn't exist before 1960 is nonsense and exclusionary and assuming everyone was cis unless proven otherwise is BS. However, we do not know Dr Barry's stance on the matter. I can understand why most historians would be careful with placing a label on someone that they might or might not have chosen for themselves. The solution would be to word very carefully what the actions of a certain person were, to try to not interpret their identity for them and emphasise that while they did not call themselves trans (afaik) they well could have been.

They? Is there more than one of him?

they 1. used to refer to two or more people or things previously mentioned or easily identified. 2. used to refer to a person of unspecified gender.

Ramen!

Another super-being to be consumed by the IPU, yum!

Heresy. "There is only the Emperor, and he is you Shield and Protectot." Book of the Astronomicon page 67

You had to mention spaghetti! Now I'm hungry. Where's my pasta? Thanks a lot e4!!

No you haven't

Kjell C How is it possible that they haven’t if historically non binary identities weren’t accepted or even acknowledged in western cultures

You can thank Beau Brummell for the state of men's fashion over the last two centuries.

It is considered one piece. I am thinking the reason the came to three pieces of clothing is that the people of Buffalo that came up with that rule were too prudish to name the three pieces of clothing. Looking it up just now, it seems the general idea was that butch women typically wore a T-shirt, no bra, jeans, and tennis shoes - three pieces of clothing considered masculine. It would then depend on how picky a police person (man) was on whether to harass such a woman or not. I note that the typical female teenager of this time (50s) stereotypically wore a sweater, bra, skirt, sneakers, and bobby socks - not so unlike, but note the bra, the thing females would later remove in the 60s to represent women's liberation

To be fair, it is a US channel and aimed at the US population so it would naturally zero in on US based issues. Otherwise, where would you draw the line? At strictly Western History? That would also make it less than global. In the interest of time, you have to make choices about what you do and don't cover.

By the title of the channel, the video intro and the paragraph below the video it advertises its self as a general fact/history channel, not a USA one. Why draw a line, it's supposed to be the history of laws against cross-dressing so mention the pertinent facts relating to that subject. They should have at least linked the ancient history to the modern day by mentioning which country first made it a law, which had the most laws or which punished those prosecuted hardest before focusing on America. They cut out a large part of "the origin" of the history of the laws to jump to the USA, I find its something unique to American documentaries, often they only mention what year something was invented but often not who, where, why or how something was invented if it wasn't in the USA. For example, I was watching a US program supposedly on how the steam train changed "the world", they only stated that the steam train was invented in 1804 then with no other information offered they jumped to an in-depth look at when the railways arrived in American and how they grew and changed the landscape of the USA. This would have been a good documentary if it was the history of the American railway but it was supposed to be about the effect of the steam train on the world.

Lady Lockett, I hear you. But the honest answer is that most Americans don't care about the rest of the world in any detail. Not me, of course. I am a geographer so it matters greatly to me and I try every day to remedy that situation. There is a great quote I like to give my fellow countrymen "War is the gods way of teaching Americans geography." That being said, NPR is an American channel. It is basically the American version of the BBC. And as the largest English speaking economy in the world, you might be able to forgive the average American their myopic view of the world, as well as the products made to cater to them. The short answer is that if the channel went into greater detail and covered the entire global history of any one of the subjects they cover, the average consumer would tune out. It would simply be too long. I guess you could say tha the title should be "How the Steam Train Changed OUR world." Unfortunate, but it is a reality. Peace.

Lady Lockett The problem with doing a global perspective is that history tends to be written in the language of the people who care about it... and that's usually the people that live in region where the history happened. So, Spanish people care about Spanish history, Canadians about Canadian history, and so on and so forth. So, these videos would end up still being English centric, because they probably wouldn't have the budget to scour through non-English speaking histories.

I don't agree, I watch a lot of documentories and more often than not those made outside of the US will always mention the general origin, history and facts of the subject in question and will only focus on one countries history with it only if it's of perticular note. Whereas i've noticed a trend in US based ones to only mention when or how whatever the subject is, arrived or affected America (unless of course it was invented there, then they are quite detailed on it's history). The video focuses on one small subject not a whole country's history they could have easily mentioned the examples linking ancient and modern day I gave earlier with out it being a long video. They simply didnt want to and presented only information in regards to the USA while advertising the fact it was the general origin of the subject. It just seems to be a trend or habit i've noticed when watching US made documentories.

User friendly pace, not place

And I thinked i put at x1.5 speed.

Do you know how far I had to scroll down to find your comment? My thoughts exactly

I've read every book of the bible. There are no verses which specifically prohibit cross-dressing. I would not expect there to be because women and men wore basically the same clothing in ancient Israel. The basis for the laws was the connection, however tenuous, between cross-dressing and homosexuality: and/or witchcraft as in the case of Joan of Arc. The video maker kept mentioning Joan, but actually she was burnt at the stake for dressing as a man which was considered evidence of her being a witch. Although granted her real offense was serving the French King. Additionally, at least in the English-speaking world, cross-dressing was associated with the decadent Tudor establishment in the 16th century. Thus the Puritans railed against it, because they were seeking to destroy the Tudor establishment. Undoubtably they tortured some poor Bible verse to that end, but you are living in the 21st century and perfectly capable of interpreting Bible verses for yourself. Angels are usually depicted as being both male and female, i.e. as perfected humans. God is also deemed to be both male and female. St. Paul said: "in Christ there is neither male nor female". The Bible's stance on the issue of gender-bending and cross-dressing is fairly clear: it's perfectly fine. After all, an obsession with physicality and the flesh is evil and the work of the devil. A true Christian concerns themselves only with the person beneath the flesh.

Deuteronomy 22:5 “A woman shall not wear a man's garment, nor shall a man put on a woman's cloak, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God."

@@rperlberg Technically that verse could be referring to clothes for religious services or telling women not to steal men's clothes. Remember everyone wore robes back then, and robes are basically dresses for men.

+rperlberg, alright I stand corrected. There's one, in the book of rules that hardly anyone follows. The reasons why rules against things are made is never really to do with religion unless the state in question is a theocracy. It's to do with politics. The rules against cross-dressing in America were made because the people who founded the original colonies were all rebelling against the Tudor establishment, which tolerated cross-dressing.

@Lesbian Amazon Sister it wasn't high heels made originali for man but after the woman tried to copy them (men),the mens stop wearing them? P.S.: happy to see you again.

High heels have been worn for centuries by both men and women. I don't know why men stopped, but it couldn't have been because women started.

I think it had to do with the fall of French monarchy. Suddenly, everyone did the impossible to avoid dressing as before, as they could be signaled as royalist. So a new fashion prevailed (the empire fashion) which was considered more "sensible" and "natural" than the previous one, and was completelly different: lack of heels for men, lack of huge skirts for women, lack of make up for both, etc... (fun note, once Napoleon lost his favour, fashion changed again, to a completelly different style)

In the 70s men wore platforms lol

I am in favour of everyone wearing whatever the hell they want, however, enforcing only women to wear footwear that is painful and causes longterm and sometimes permanent damage to the feet, legs and back is bullshit. Go wear high heels then and change the culture in your office or workplace. Women have been trying to get rid of nonsense rules in the workplace about heels for a while. Having options is the point.

As they should

You can find a lot of other videos on youtube about this. I'd rather see them make a video on a topic that hasn't been talked about much.