WHY WELL INSIDE THE CHURCH? Mystery 

Trying our best :) thanks Valdo

Hello valdo

@@TIMEntertainmentFilms from where you got the information that a cross cannot remain on this church, please do proper research when you talk on certain matters or atleast contact local church officials, I can only say that holy cross will remain on any structure not only on church.

@@LuzianJ no this particular church was built in the the 17th century, an this was the place where st. Francis Xavier stayed when he came to goa. The Adil shah place which was destroyed is in a different places, there are marking done where the palace existed an some remains of the palace is still there. There was no temple at that spot, an remember when all people specifically gaunkars got converted all temples which were in goa at that time were abandoned by the locals, because new religion taught them that what they were following earlier were evil practices. This temples were of mud an stones an since they were abandoned an nobody took care of this structures it collapsed because of whether conditions. But people who came to goa in such of jobs during Portuguese time spread this rumors that this temples were destroyed by the Portuguese, always remember only gaunkars of the villages were this temples existed has a right to complain or protest if they think that this temples were actually destroyed because all temples were built by the gaunkars of the village with their own contributions an on the their own lands. An remember before 1510 all the locals who were there were only gaunkars. Rest of the people who now claims to be goans came to goa during Portuguese rule in such of jobs.

@@LuzianJ to tell you the truth, what history you here about goa is made by people who have no knowledge an no connection to goa, an who came to goa during Portuguese rule an claiming to be goans. When the bjp government was formed recently in goa they said they will rebuild all temples destroyed during Portuguese rule, when they actually wanted to find where this temples were they could locate any of them an the answer given in the state assembly was that there are no records available of the destroyed temples.

This is not the well used by St. Francis Xavier. There is another Chapel and we'll next to the ruins of St. Paul College. By the time the St. Francis xavier died on 3rd Dec 1552 and St. CAJETAN CHURCH WAS COMPLETED IN 1661. PLEASE READ HISTIRY FIRST AND COMMENT.

@@lourencodafatimasouza1479 the history of the well was told to me by the priest who use to conduct retreat at old goa for school children more then 30yrs back. Agreed an I also know that the church was completed in 1661, but the well was built long before the construction of the church.

The priest who conducted the retreat may be he was not historian. Don't believe everything told by priests as they too are human beings like us with no knowledge or half knowledge.

Thanks :) Noted.

No actually it's perfect

@@TIMEntertainmentFilms from where you got that photograph of a temple over there, because I think photography never existed at that time an the same photo some people connected to rss show wherever they think a temple existed.

The big stones were brought from Bassein One of the seven islands of Bombay. The people say that the Goan Churches were built by using manpower called Palistos actually they are followers of St. PAUL and they were Paulists. Mostly ancient churches are built close to river front for transportation of Stones by boats. Quarrying was not done in Goa. That is the reason old Temples and houses are built of mud mixed with lime Jaggery and kept for maturing.

Not Shefali Vaidya, please. She's a Pune-based housewife who never moved her fat butt and did any actual investigative research of the Inquisition records. The result is that her Goa history videos are pure bullshit based on MGP pro-Merger propaganda from the 1960s. Ask Agostino Borromeo and Alan Machado instead (professional historians that investigated Vatican and Lisbon archives on activities of the Inquisition).

@@cg8397 history is written by winners obviously the loser's side of the story will be called propaganda.

Nope, even contemporary records of the neighbouring Vijayanagar Empire don't support her narrative. Note that the Vijayanagar rulers were powerful Hindus who remained allied with the Portuguese during this time period. If there were such anti-Hindu brutalities taking place, then the Vijayanagar Empire would have turned on the smaller Portuguese forces and crushed them.

@@cg8397 that's right 'Allies'

@@siddhantprabhuvelguenkar7478 Yes, they were allies. When Krishnadevaraya of the Vijayanagar Empire captured Rachol area (Salcette) in 1520, he gave it to the Portuguese. Note that the majority of Goans remained in the Velhas Conquistas instead of leaving because they preferred the leadership of the Portuguese to that of your ancestors.

Since it has Hindu carvings

It has Hindu carvings check Shantadurga Fatarpekan temple they had to rebuild it after being fed up of being plundered by Muslim conquest

This comment is not against Muslims in any way It's just that when fights used to happen between Kadambas and the Sultanate they the sultanate would plunder temples as a sign of victory often no. Often times they used jihad jihad to justify their violence it's just a case of Kadambas Vs Sultanate don't turn it into a Hindu-Muslim issue

@@snaik9141 understand comments right way, it is not against any religion ,history says Portuguese conquer from muslim rulers

Learn to accept the truth... it happened n it's the truth

What about burning the wifes alive in the wood pyre when the husband died that lasted for centuries? Do you know who ended that savagery? Afonso de Albuquerque. And you talk about massacres? Please...

@@luissilva6970 Burning wife? this is why you converted rice bags to need education on indigenous history or culture. Sati practice was not forced, if a beloved husband dies and women feel like she is left over she is allowed to take her life, and no one forced her, it was a free will but despite Britishers narratives, there was no proof of people actually practicing this

@@nayanvaishnav8922 you are giving too much importance to a moronic colonialism apologist. The Goa freedom kicked his ancestors' behind so bad that his butt is still hurting.

Where do you get your evidence of a massacre like what's your PRIMARY SOURCE? The INTERNET?

I a a proud Bamonn (ie. Roman Catholic with Gaud Saraswat Brahmin heritage). I am so glad the Portuguese came to Goa to convert and civilize my people. Amen forever 🙏

Trying our best :) Thanks!