In all 50 States in America, you have zero expectancy of privacy outside of your own home, and even then, only if your shades and curtains are closed. This is literal law.
@@ShotByJAllenwhile i understand and enjoy watching those, i can see the point of view. Kai w took a photo of a homeless man pushing a bunch of crap, his face was embarrassed and he kept trying to move out the shot. Kai kept his face for 1 whole minute on the screen while talking, i feel that was mean.
Very timely and needed video. Have a few comments about the technicalities of the delivery - work on normalizing your audio. The music is too loud, and the voice is very jumpy - learn to compress audio. Also, never shoot from below, always try to shoot from above yourself, it's a more flattering angle. And definitely keep up the work, you're off to a great start!
Agreed. 1. Don’t be a dick. 2. Don’t take photos of strangers with the intention of selling or commercializing them without their legally given consent. (Looking at you AI, you art stealing robots) 3. This goes without saying but… Absolutely do NOT take photos of minors or people’s kids unless you’re permitted to by their legal guardians or by some form of legally binding contract. Other than that it’s free reign a public space.
I'm referring to the paparazzi that lurk outside the homes of celebrities and individuals to sell to tabloids rags. I wouldn't really consider it "news" so much as public obsession and entertainment. The kind of people shooting photos and video into homes, to the point that people have nervous breakdowns. The type that would fly helicopters over celebrity weddings and disturb the proceedings. Public celebrity photography is one thing, stalking someone with a camera for money is entirely different.
@@ShotByJAllen Understand, but I think there is a lot of grey area. What I struggle to understand is, there is always a disdain for Paparazzi and the methods they use, yet mainstream news outlets and journalists will use similar tactics to capture stories, and they are applauded and recieve awards. The only difference I see is one is a sole trader freelancer, the other employed by a large corporation 🤷♂️
I think the content and purpose differentiates between the two. Celebrity lifestyle is markedly different than national news in the way that celebrity lifestyle is for gossip with no actual purpose other than entertainment. News would be pertaining to political interest and significant world events and conflicts. It's one of those lines in the sand that I mentioned in the video. I may disagree with the tactics and dislike it, but they're still free to do it and I'd never stop them from doing so. I might judge them a bit though.
