Twitch: / dankus_memecus This game Germany decided to do medium tanks against our heavy tank USSR. The thing about mediums are that they dont pierce heavy tanks... Edited by Dijon Dillan
One of the things I’m most excited for in the next update is to watch dankus break the tank meta beyond repair, I wanna see heby tonks that are heavier than the average building
Was it a single player guide? In SP the AI makes terrible templates, sometimes using light tanks even into the 50s. That makes the extra cost of heavy tanks wasted since mediums will survive as well but for a fraction of the cost
@@cm01 Yeah cuz they are just rich dudes living there. But america likely is still the most obese actual country (so not an exclusive tax haven). But yeah euro memes exaggerate a lot
Not really a meme, there's a 36 % obesity rate in usa compared to 27% uk or 20% in sweden. Not just that the break down from healthy weight overweight and obese is the worst in america. Addmitidley I think the rates have decreased in recent years but so's the amount of people with access to all the recommended calories.
Just one thing, about overweight/obesety. You compared two different things, the Swedish one was over 25 bmi, and the US was over 30 bmi. There is a huge (pun intended) difference between 42.4% of people over 30 bmi and 50% over 25 bmi. Gött mos! :D
Let's not get too hasty there. Not only are the tank classifications a mess (everyone had different systems to fit their needs and doctrine), a fully maintained Tiger tank with a trained crew would triumph over an M4 or Churchill more often than not. Of course, then circumstances come into play like reliability, production numbers, infantry support bla bla. Heavy tanks also at least for some people were intended to attack fortified positions, not other tanks. Modern main battle tanks are also closer to heavy tanks with weight often above 60 tons... I think I had a point with this, but I lost it.
@@Starjumper2821 if the germans had only produced panthers they wouldnt have won, but maybe delay their end a bit, the tiger is an awful example as it had outdated armor by 1943 standards, the thing was their enemies went down quantity over quality for tanks which was a questionable focus, a much better example is the tiger 2, it had very modern armor (at the time), and most likely the best gun on the battlefield, a decent speed for its weight, but it was way too expensive to produce for the germans and without air cover easy to destroy in an airstrike, it also shows a change of focus on the gun as previously it was thought a larger caliber gun is always better, but the panthers 75mm gun could actually penetrate more than the tigers 88mm gun because it was longer, that discovery is shown by the tiger 2 still having a 88mm gun that was just longer with some slight other improvments, the 105mm was also tested on paper but it didnt come out to much more penetration power. Modern MBTs arent closer to heavy tanks, they are 50% 50% between medium tanks and heavy tanks, with the goods aspects of both, high speed, thicc armor, a powerful gun, the weight is the main issue for them, but not the same as for a heavy tank, but i can agree with that statment for some MBTs mostly the abrams.
Both the Tiger and Panther guns outclassed the Soviet's armour by far. The 88 could usually cause more damage to the tanks it hit and didn't need more penetration whilst the 75 on the Panther tore straight through Soviet tanks. This advantage over the Soviets only remained a short time though because of newer variants of tanks, such as the T-34-85, the KV-85, IS-1, IS-2, SU-85, SU/SU-122 and the SU-100. The T-34-85, KV-85 and IS-1, though disadvantaged, could engage and destroy a Panther with ease whilst a Tiger was significantly easier to engage. The SU-100 though dominated both the Panther and Tiger with ease (by stats comparison) with its only real rival being the King Tiger. By comparison though the SU-100 was much cheaper, so the USSR could afford to lose a few to kill a King Tiger. When it comes to the allies, most allied tanks were killed with extreme ease by the Germans who had far superior experience in mechanised warfare. However, over time the majority of Sherman tanks in Europe were able to engage and outperform Tigers and Panthers. Whilst most American tanks couldn't kill a King Tiger, they never really needed to as when they were to engage one they would either request Close Air Support or flank it. Though the Tigers were poor, if the Germans were to simply produce only Panthers instead it likely wouldn't have even delayed their end. The Soviets simply possessed larger quantities of cheap tanks that could kill theirs with ease whilst the allies were quickly learning how to put a gun in a tank during their own Blitzkrieg across France.
Can anyone explain to me what he’s talking about at 2:10 - 2:37? I understood that he is getting all the dockyards to spawn at Leningrad due to the focus and then he’s going to delete them? I think he’s doing this because he will have 10 infa in the state and wants to build mils, but that doesn’t make sense to me. He’s wasting time on the focus or he could have them spawn somewhere else if what he’s saying about the mechanics is true.
The dockyard focus adds building slots to fit in the dockyards. So you get more building slots where you have high infrastructure if you delete the dockyards.
Is it just me or is what he said about the dockyards completely non-sensical? So you delete all dockyards besides 1 in Leningrad Take the focus Delete the dockyards it gives you Then you have max infrastructure in all tiles you are building mills in? Wtf?
Try to rush the south and launch a lot of naval invasions at the same time. Soviet doesn't have a lot of tanks in reserve in the beginning so you can overwhelm them.
It's colloquial German and basically is used like dude. "Oh man alter" can be used to express disbelief somewhat like "oh boy" and a long drawn aaaalter basically equals the drawn out duuude, both expressing disbelief as well.
