A very cool concept for a game, honestly looking forward to its release! My 2 cents is the corrupted enemies/titans will be the "destruction" counterpart to the player, perhaps they invade biomes/villages you've built up.
That sounds incredibly interesting! Building up the ecosystem rather than fighting it or tearing it down for your own benefit. I really love games that have environmental interaction over just doing random shit in some setting.
Now im rly exited for this game i just knew, so congratulation you achived what you wanted with this video this game looks like something i rly would enjoy
Finally, a multiplayer survival where I don't have to worry that my pets will get nuked to death by some dumbass kid while I'm offline (I'm speaking of ark)
I'm sorry, but I fine your comment dumb. The game allows that players can kill other player dino's. If you don't like that, then do better or play on a different server that has a rule against it.
Thank you so much for sharing this vid! I had no idea of this game even tho I check from time to time if there's a survival game with creatures either being sci-fi, fantasy, or prehistoric life. I have no interest in zombies or humanoid mutants and Ark: survival devastated me, someone passionate of paleontology, spec-evo and creature designs. This game could be it, something to admire and immerse into ^^
This looks like an awesome game. Honestly Ive had it with PvP games, there is really no way to keep the toxicity out of them. And am I crazy or at 7:57 were those pikmin?
@@muaythainorge yeah but that sort of fun gets old eventually. And imo the toxicity part doesnt really add to the fun. The fun part is competing against real people and (hopefully) winning. That cam be fun with or without toxicity (and in the case of "with toxicity" its usually only fun if you manage to beat them).
@@muaythainorge it runs out for individuals... but there are always new kids joining up. Also remember everything I say is just my opinion. But I imagine the only people who play games like rust and ark long term are probably pretty good at them so they can be the "winners" more often than not. And honestly if anyone finds it "fun" to be in a toxic environment lomg term... maybe they should rethink some things (and that last point is just my opinion)
@@muaythainorge the bottom line is I can claim anything is bad... its my opinion. You can have your own opinion on things. But right now you are arguing me against my opinion... which I dont think you will win lol. Sensitive???? No man ... not sensitive at all... I just dont have time for toxicity and will choose to keep it out of my life whenever possible. But there will always be people who like toxicity (and are often toxic themselves..... no offense 😉) which is why some games will continue to be popular.
@@muaythainorge and for your "objectively" arguement that relies only on your feelings and opinions (which is the complete oposite of an objective argument)... thats like saying; because lots of people like cocaine and heroin... they cannot be objectively bad. Yeah they can. Toxicity in games are kind of like hotdogs... lots of people like them (especially younger people) but that doesnt mean they arent objectively bad for you... and just because I dont like them doesnt mean I have a weak stomach... it jjst means I dont like eating garbage. As for all PvP having toxicity... wrong again, there are lots of PvP games that dont have toxic communities because they have rules and are moderated... so picture PvP games as being like a BBQ.... not everyone wants to eat just hotdogs at BBQs... which is why its nice to have some BBQs that offer burgers instead.
Before the comments get stupid and start saying, "Wow, a survival game that isn't pvp!". Shut up, thier has been game like this one, stranded deep, raft, and the recent but easily forgoten grounded, with no real pvp. This game isn't unique in that aspect, its uniqueness is from the environment building, creatures, and village building, etc. Something I think more people should see then just that.
