What yall think about the joshua graham audio tracks 💀 Edit: I've removed them for now because I realized they were translated in a fragmented way so the translations are probably terrible
It was hilarious but, Did you delete or block my comment? The upload speeds are as fast as the download speeds so hackers can easily smuggle info within a finger snap 🤌🏾💫😅
@@steelcockFor now because the translation and dubs tech are not perfect, I’ll be focusing on languages where speakers are less likely to know english. Because many in European countries are also fluent in English, it makes most sense for them to listen in the native English than a less-than-ideal dub
It may be awesome, but I still barely scan any wifi 6 routers when I walk outside and scan out of curiosity. Even less 6GHz network. I can't see wifi 7 being widely used before 5 years.
Yeah, this typically happens with new tech Way back when USB C was introduced hardly any devices used it, now basically every device now uses USB C and you'd be hardpressed to find any moderately priced device released within the last 3 years that DOESN'T have at least one USB C port in it Same with 4k, hardly anything supported it at the time, now EVERYTHING supports it
5 years ago we said that about WiFi 6 and still almost nobody is using it. Most devices don't even need 6, let alone 7 so why pay extra in manufacturing for a feature you'll barely ever use or need unless you're a super high end device.
@@cjlite0210not a good comparison because WiFi 6 launched in 2018 and the majority of devices don't utilize it. It's not like WiFi 6 is a necessary feature when you can send and receive data just fine on regular WiFi. You act like every device out there unanimously uses WiFi 6, just not even remotely true or correct
@RedceLL1978 the quality of life improvements are what's important here since wifi has long been fast enough. Routers can last a long time so it's just important that the standard is out for when people do need to replace their systems.
Some additional info: The WiFi 7 spec hasn't been standardized by the IEEE organization yet, this is more a formality at this point, there won't be any major changes, but the Wifi alliance and the IEEE are two different organizations. Also, not all IEEE 802.11BE devices will be WiFi 7 certified. There will be many cheaper devices that will support 2.4 and 5Ghz, but not 6Ghz. In that case they will not be WiFi 7 certified, but will use the IEEE 802.11BE protocol. Also, multi link operation has another feature that nobody seems to talk about. You don't need to be connected to a single access point with all the bands, you can be connected to one access point on 2.4Ghz, while simultaneously connect to 5 and/or 6Ghz on another. This way you will always keep a connection when roaming. Side note: most mobile devices will be limited to two bands at a time due to power and space limitations. In regard to the 4K-QAM, the real world gain over 1024-QAM is about 11%, 20% is theoretical and not realistic.
Fascinating, thanks. For domestic use, the key consideration is how well it reaches through internal walls to the far corners of the house, avoiding the need to install WiFi extenders.
@@grahamf695 range and penetration is better with low frequency. Throughput is better with high frequency. Its a tradeoff. High frequency waves will never penetrate a thick concrete wall.
Yea people tend to forget that higher QAM is also equal to more errors in the receiver! Thus theoretical gain is impossible to reach without almost perfect signal integrity ie. no noise. No noise is not a realistic scenario :P
Wi-Fi 7's max modulation of 4096 QAM is only going to work with a line of sight to the router. In fact, Wi-Fi 6's 1024 QAM already requires being in the same room or the next one over. The MCS rates drop off automatically as you get further from the AP.
@@johnsparozich6839 well not necessarily if you transfer a lot of data and have 1gbps or 2gbps fiber it will help reach your full isp speeds if you are nearby the router this helps if you are handling a lot of heavy files as 4k QAM similar to 256QAM/1084QAM fits more bits per mhz.
Another cool feature of wifi 7 is punctured transmission, which allows for a transmission even though there may be interference on a part of the Channel. One key issue with the 6Ghz band is that there are mobile operators (US) who have paid for parts of the spectrum so as of now we can only transmit on 6Ghz in low power mode. Once AFC (Automated Frequency Coordination) is in place then an AP would reach out to AFC provide its coordinates and AFC would determine which channels on the 6Ghz spectrum could be used in that area and then the AP will be able to run in standard power mode. This way it's not stepping over an operators "paid-for" spectrum. Thanks for this video Thiojoe!! Very informational as always! 👏👌
Great explanation, thank you. I brought a TP-Link BE550, a pcie card and an M.2 BE200 card for my 10 year old Dell Precision. Fiber to the house at 1 Gbps just become available at my house here in Australia and I had that installed to. The laptop didn't recognise the card but the 10 year old desktop did. I'm getting 900+ Mbps on my Galaxy Z Fold 3. My 10 year old WiFi 6 router was getting 700 Mbps through my phone.
as long as antenna signal watts out are the same as before, wifi7 is not that important for most people. Remember that the higher the frequency you have, the shorter the range and the harder it is for the signal to penetrate objects. You have special rules for how many watts the antenna signal can send out. And the telephone and laptop must also be able to send the signal back as far as the router can
This helps comercial spaces and tech savvy consumers that do heavy data loads at home as thick wireless channel we're they can likely get almost full speeds if the have fiber with a gigabit connection helping reduce the need to run cables.
I'm glad you're mentioning WiFi 7. I can say that my company is developing Wifi7 capability to be supported by D4.0 Cable Modems. We're talking above 10 Gbps support on Wifi. Simply astounding. Generating so many test packets by servers is very tricky.
Kinda True the Reason this is True for WiFi 6 was that parties involved refused to accept aspects of Wifi6 so was delayed by roughly 5 to 6 years by than they knew WiFi 7 was coming so didn't see the point of producing too much Wifi6 tech (it takes 5 to 12 years for a new standard to be widely adopted even if forced by law) Any ARM chip (For Mobile Devices!) designed since 2017/2018 should have Wifi6 baked in other than 5GHz getting a little more frequencys it was mostly WPA3 and better Packet Transfer Protocols See some members of the WiFi Alliance wanted too only do Software and Firmware Update too WiFi 6 but others wanted hardware and others wanted to wait for the 6ghz band (WiFi 6e) to be authorised before releasing WiFi 6,A similar issue happened with PCIe 4 by the time it was released PCIe 5 was nearly ready!
We may have devices that could support WiFi 7 as early as this summer. Rumor has it that the upcoming "refresh" of the Apple MacBook Air, iPhone 16 Pro models, and the upcoming refresh of the MacBook Pro may support IEEE WiFi 7 specification.
Well, I am already using it at home and the benefits are obvious. The cost is also obvious - too high at the moment, but I was willing to spend it to reach the speeds that I have from my ISP over wifi (2Gbps) :)
I've seen a couple of REDDIT threads discussing folks who couldn't get their laptop to POST after upgrading to a Wifi7/BT5.4 m.2 card. This has me thinking twice about upgrading my laptop.
I had a Lenovo laptop a few years ago that I wanted to upgrade the little pcie wifi card to also have the 5ghz band as it only had 2.4ghz but couldn't because Lenovo has a white list and there were no 5ghz wifi cards on that list. I was pretty bummed as the upgrade would have only been like $30. But alas, Lenovo and their infinite wisdom said no upgrade for you. Also some people on the forums were saying that one could theoretically get an eprom flasher and flash a new list to the eprom chip but that definitely wasn't happening and was waaay over my skill level 😂
It’ll be four years before this is more widely utilized and affordable. Nobody talks much about range because these higher frequencies are terrible. So likelihood is that if you’re any distance from the router all three bands are not going to be working at the same time.
If I'm not mistaken, I was hoping that "multiband" would work in the same network too for legacy devices, but is not the case. So, different legacy gadgets would connect to their supported frequency without the need to have independent Wi-Fi networks for individual bands. However, if I understand correctly, you would still need to configure independent networks for each band for legacy devices. So "multiband" is only for using them at the same time on supporting (Wi-Fi 7) devices. I don't know if what I suggested is technically possible within the Wi-Fi standard and technology, but if it is possible, should be incorporated in the next revision, because it would be very convenient: only one network to all the devices, new and old! Other thing about the bands: 2.4 ghz is still very relevant to this day depending where you live. The rest of the bands can't pass walls with the same reach as 2.4 ghz in my experience.
I did plan on upgrading to the S24 ultra, but not for wifi7. I'll probably just keep my wifi 6 router until I feel like I'd benefit from multi-gig speeds on my internal network. Currently everything in my house is gigabit and that's fine for now even when moving larger video files across my network.
I bought a used B450 AMD motherboard last month and was pleasantly surprised to find out that the onboard wi-fi was wi-fi 7. Hell, I had no idea we were there yet. Now I'm wondering: If I create a mobile hotspot using the on board wi-fi, will it broadcast on the higher frequencies? I will have to try this tomorrow when I'm at work.
*FYI I returned the ASUS ROG Rapture GT-BE98 Pro (latest high-end WiFi 7 router) because* it was dropping packets CONSTANTLY. Be advised that just because something is $900 and WiFi 7 that does not automatically mean it's going to be the best. Went back to my AmpliFi Aliens (WiFi 6, not even 6E) and have much better experience.
@@slomnim This issue is not limited to the Wi-Fi 7 model. I’ve seen forum posts with other ASUS routers having the same issue. Unfortunately there are no good Wi-Fi 7 routers out there yet. AmpliFi needs to make a Wi-Fi 7 Alien for sure.
I was overdue for an upgrade and already got the TP-Link that I saw at the end of the approved list a few months back. Even though I only have WiFi 6 in my tablet, it already shows over 1Gbps connections. Glad I splugged a little. And to be honest that model has 2 10Gbps and 4 2.5Gbps ports so now I can connect to the homelab to my main desktop at 10Gbps which saved me having to by that piece of gear.
Last week I said to my friend I would consider replacing my old WiFi4 Ubiquiti AP once they released one with WiFi7, and then the next day they did. Got the new U7-Pro and very happy with it so far. I'm in Europe and was able to assign the 6GHz with 320MHz bandwidth, not that I have anything that can use it yet. Even so, my Pixel 7 Pro and Surface Go 3 are getting 2Gbit up/down all over my apartment, with occasional drops to 1.5Gbit - the Surface certainly feels snappier now when I watch HD video.
We provide commercial wifi in my area; and we are have our initial wifi 7 gear on order and are looking to start our clients initial Wifi 7 base by end of the month (January 2024). Wifi 6 & 6E has been a great standard; We are going to deploy Zyxel commercial gear... Our experience with our Zyxel rep has been a huge factor for the deployment.
I think it's mostly relevant for commercial/public infrastructure. I just use ethernet for my PC and phones, work mac, firetv etc connected to wifi don't need gigabits of bandwidth.
In India, Gov has not allowed to use 6 GHz even for Wi-Fi 6E. Until this band issue is resolved. Wi-Fi 7 hardly holds any value here. Most of the Indian are on 30, 40 or 50 Mbps Wi-Fi 5. Or few at 100, 150 or 200 Mbps on Wi-Fi 5 only. Some who have older connection before COVID maybe still using Wi-Fi 4. Only handful of tech enthusiasts have got Wi-Fi 6.
The WiFi version is about more than just speed Also WiFi 5 has a real-world of no more than 1gbps the lowest range and permeability of the 5GHz range among other things WiFi 7 would mainly be for local communication between devices, more efficient operation and higher speeds at the same range and further max range before dropout even bs WiFi 6E Also theoretical speeds are also lie speeds... some power line adapters for example advertise 1200mbps and are full certified but you will ONLY get upto 100mbps out of them at most
@@donkey7921 thats just because the quest is dog **** when using the oculus or virtual desktop program Steams implementation is way better [coming from someone that bought a 6E router for the 1 thing and can get 1.7gbps out of the thing transferring from 1 pc to another] The quest antenna just sucks ass
Yeah, you don’t know anything about Wi-Fi… But, that’s why I’m here, to give you the simple explanation: Wi-Fi 5 = Slow & Dumb (think of doing one thing at a time) Wi-Fi 7 = Fast, Smart (Doing multiple tasks at a time), Lower Latency (less hiccups with speed), and more efficient.
QAM or similar, allows for multiple bits to be send in "one period" (remember we are modulating a wave - like the sinus function for example). Its stand for quadratic amplitude modulation - in Essence less noise gives more room for better "resolution" in the signal. If you wanna send 1 bit , you split up the signal in 2 from the interpreters pov. Say everything above 0 is interpreted as a 1 , and below zero is 0. Nothing is stopping you from defining this "space" into more slices. 2^2 = 4, so to send 2 bits we need a resolution of 4 in the interpreter. everything below -2 is 00, between -2 and zero is 01, 0 and 2 is 11, and 2 and above is 10. And so on. You can also send 10 bits if you want, what is stopping us from just sending more bits is the signal noise. We can always turn up the transmitters bitrate at the cost of signal integrity (error rate). Effective bitrate will the the total of signal minus error rate. 5G uses QAM64 I think ...
The essence of the technique is in the name. AMPLITUDE MODULATION - We modulate the signal by amplitude , and the interpreter will function as stated above, only really caring about the amplitude of the signal. We can modulate in many other fancy ways. One of my favorites is orthogonal modulation whereby you encode multiple bitsstreams in one wave, by mathematically letting the bits be orthogonal vectors - and thus not influencing each other. In this case you have to do mathematics in the reciever on the incoming wave before you can read the two seperate bitstreams.
Until Wi-fi is allowed to increase its actual output power, adding higher frequencies just means less long range, which is often needed more than the absolute potential nearby increased peak speeds.
WiFi 7 is defitely an overdue upgrade. I set up a high end home propety with tp link system about 3 months before this video. They are no longer having range or speed issues. I also bought the BE200 and the only place I'm able to make it work is my desktop pcs with an adapter. It doesn't fit my older laptops and my newer one has a 6e card soldered to the board. I'd like to see some WiFi 7 dongles. They'd need to be at least usb 3.2 or thunderbolt connections for the bandwidth.
you can make your own dongle with a PCIe to USB adapter. USB sticks are not relevant anymore either, just buy NVME to USB adapater and put in an nvme drive that you can upgrade or move in or out of your computer. NVME drives are so much more reliable than shitty usb sticks. Plus i am pretty sure there are small 2x nvme slot -> usb adapters too which is basically a small NAS for redundancy storage.
This is a bit of a bummer that not all countries are adopting the same standard. Previously I could buy an unlocked phone from any country and I knew it would work in my country. But if band adoption is different then this would no longer be the case. 🤨
Interesting. I just finished building a new computer and it has a motherboard with Wi-Fi 7. I didn't know what it was when I bought it, all I knew was that I wanted a board that could connect to my bluetooth devices without the need for a dongle. So this was a good explanation for me.
I have a MESH WiFi 7 network at home with 2 Xiaomi BE7000. It is the best you can have. This was an update of the Xiaomi AX7000, and now waiting for an Xiaomi BE3600 wifi 7 to test. This is a very advanced technology because it is not easy to have access to Fiber optic 2.5 Gbps link and above, nowadays. It is like something from the future you can buy now . Maybe in the next 5 years t will be more useful, but now it is too advanced for the internet providers still working with Wifi 5 and Wifi 6.
Figures. Just bought a smokin' hot WiFi 6 TPLink router a few weeks ago. Instant obsolescence. Sigh. The 7 standard looks awesome though. Love the idea of the multi-band redundancy. Thanks for the video Joe!
@@thetechrealist From 4, or 3, or 2, or whatever we were on before, yeah. We didn't jump from 5, I can tell you that. Larger point: Bought 6 thinking it was the new hotness, just to find out something else is hotter weeks after we bought it. A moment of irony I thought I'd share with the welcoming, un-skeptical, gracious and sympathetic public out there, whom I just knew you'd be a part of. 🙂
I upgraded from wifi 4 to 6 this week and I gotta say that wifi 6 speed is a lot more consistent as you move away from the router. Also wouldn't transmitting 3 different bands at the same be battery intensive?
In india, I'm yet to see anyone have over 200mbps. I have heard of ISPs providing 500mbps, but honestly, we need a way to make internet cheaper; we have the means to propagate gigabit speeds at this point, but anything over 100mbps is priced like hell.
@@high-captain-BaLrog That's not what I meant. I meant that if we ever wanted to make good use of these technologies such as WiFi 7 and CAT 8E, the cost of internet all around the world would need to be cheaper per unit increase in speed. I gave the example of india since that is what I'm familiar with.
At 6:22 Wi-Fi emergency.... Do you think this could be similar to what the cell companies used with 911?? Your cell phone that is on Verizon can make a 911 call off an AT&T tower, for instance....
I am disappointed that the the Wi-Fi 7 spectrum varies depending on the country. It makes it difficult to plan and administer Wi-Fi 7 for offices in multiple countries. Standards should be invariant internationally.
In my opinion, allowing 320 MHz wide channels in Europe is a bad idea with the current spectrum allocation. I have a pair of WiFi 6E access points here (Ubiquiti U6 Enterprise) and only channels 33 to 93 are usable. We already have a situation where the higher end channels in 5 GHz are unusable on most devices due to them having draconian power restrictions (14 dBm, roughly 25 mW), so only 36 to 48 is usable if you don't want DFS.
maybe that's why its only on higher frequency ? as it doesn't penetrate wall that well depending on the material. outdoor deployment on the other hand will be messy.
I installed the Intel BE200 on my Dell G3 3500, which uses Intel i7 10th gen CPU. I've got the TP-Link Archer BE800 (BE19000) which is WiFi7 certified now. All seems to be working great! I use the MLO network and I get my full 2Gbps speeds, provided by my ISP through WiFi7 connection, across two walls (not concrete). So If anyone is to buy the Intel BE200 adapter, makes sure you don't buy the NGW version of it, if you have an intel cpu gen lower than 12th.
Wifi 7 is really cool! I recently bought a Wifi 6 AP though and none of my devices support it yet. Gonna give it a couple if years and then I'll upgrade eventually
emergency call on mobile phones is done via a special emergency call features. emergency call features is enabled when dialing 911 or similar. All phones can make an emergency call of this kind. It is not limited to special emergency call units or phones. I imagine WIFI emergency features will be similar. maybe router can flag an ip as "emergency data unit"
In the end the thing that is MOST important in the router is the number of Antenas I got WiFi 5 3X3 I definetly wont spend 1.5K for 4X4 If as promissed well get 8X8 antenas or especially 16X16 on at least 5Ghz amd 6Ghz bands Ill jump to buy
Just gotta say that I love the way you handle AI generated content. Completely transparent, and fun, like we're part of the creation process. Bravo - youve had a handle on this for a while.
Cool, sounds pretty useful for my decade devices that are falling apart because of the prices set by scalpers are too high and companies have done nothing about it and continue to ship out pallets of gpus which end up on ebay for 10x cost
@ThioJoe QAM, Quadrature Amplitude Modulation, describes a transmission where data is sent over two, or more, channels simultaneously, by utilizing signal amplitude, as well as destructive/constructive interference, with a simple description anyhow.
Multi link connections would be, especially if is managed - first come first serve I.e. higher data goes to higher 6ghz and simple appliances reserve 2.4ghz
You said "Regulate". Now I need to listen to the Warren G song, while opening my laptop and unsolder the surface mounted chips to upgrade them to Wifi 7. Easy peasy.
1:20 Joe it's in 6E 2:40 Add new 60Ghz as WiFi7E😂 Ultra Mega Super Duper Giga..Speed loll most of smartphone people considered to buy hardly getting WiFi6 in it..5-10yrs may take out
2.4Ghz, 13 available channels, 3 useable. 5Ghz, 24 available channels, 2 useable. 6Ghz, 59 available channels, 3 useable. It's the bandwidth that makes wifi unuseable. Where I live the 2.4Ghz band has over 30 APs all trying to use just 3 channels. On the 5Ghz nothing works if set to use any of the channels above #64, and there are 7APs broadcastinng over the 2 useable channels.
We got rid of our home wifi 2 years ago when 5G came out, the cell tower is line of sight from the house so we get full signal we hot spot from the phone to the tablets and laptops speed is good everything pops
Yeah who needs the convenience and security of a centralised internet home connection and router with a private LAN behind it...let's just give each of our devices their own public IP and make them potentially reachable by anyone in the world. Good luck everybody.
Thanks for the update. I'll wait to see how it plays out as I am not one to jump into the innovator cycle as it is typically more expensive and that cycle is used for "gamma' testing in real use scenarios. (Pluck, pluck, pluck ;~)
I got my router from my isp, works great for what i need it to do and i get the speeds i pay for with it so i am not going to change it out anytime soon (unless my isp offers of me a free upgrade to a new router which they did with my current one)
6:55 - Newer later in the year VR headsets, since for wireless its technically less expensive compared to WiGi and easier to use just a wireless router and VR headset.
My router died a few years ago. I just noticed that the new router and all of my phones and laptops are wifi 6. I get at least 400mbit around the house and its very reliable.
4K QAM? Well, that's work... but the noise sensitivity is going to be ridiculous. It'll get you higher throughput, but only when you've got the best possible wi-fi signal. If you're not sitting with next to the AP, it'll have to fall back to a slower mode.
I can see some important benefits. For example, if you can reduce the airtime for users who just happen to be very close to the AP, you can get done with their transfers faster and so get better overall throughput.
You know its too bad when i first clicked on one of your videos (14 years ago not sure) it was one about how to strengthen your wifi signal it was my first and last time i clicked on your videos only because you were making fun of the topic you never took it seriously so every time i looked for help on youtube i saw you making a funny face and i knew instant ohh Thio is making fun of that again so i never clicked your videos never left you a comment never said a bad word about you but i understand people can not trust you with your videos even after such a nice video about wifi7 it leaves a bad after taste people ask themselves is this really true what he says but no one takes the time to fact check what you say so it is what it is you are a very old youtuber its too bad i always had to see you as an online troll because you are a very intelligent man
Intercompatibilty between the legacy bands and 6GHz was a weakness on 6e I believe - I think that has been addressed on 7 to make it a bit more seamless when using older devices. Curiously QAM is an interesting topic in terms of how many bits can be carried in a symbol but the higher it gets the more noise affects the signal and thus the radio environment needs to be super clean - even over a coax cable 64 and 256 QAM are the norm though powerline ethernet and ADSL use higher modulation schemes I believe - likewise at either end the processing needed is pretty heavy to distinguish those symbols so as much as the headline of 1024 QAM sounds great I wonder how useful it will be unless at point blank range from the AP 🤔
I'm literally waiting for the AVM FRITZ!Box 5690 Pro to be released and I hope it will be available before I get my fiber connection. I need a new main router for that anyways and while I'm at it... and to be fair, not even exactly because of Wifi 7, but it also is backwards compatible and can provide triband 6E, which is a massive upgrade for Quest 3 streaming for wireless PCVR. And since I typically do that in rooms my main router is not in, I might actually just get three of those. Wanna stick to that manufacturer because of the feature set, currently though I just run a single 7590 with a few ISP routers that just act as Wifi 5 APs (and are doing great). AVM only has some mid tier models with Wifi 6 support (for cable only BTW, but that wouldn't matter if I only used them as AP) though and they skipped 6E completely. Going from 5 to just 6 isn't worth it which is why I still just run 5. I could also just get one and two Asus RT-AXE7800s, but well... as soon as the next Quest would utilize Wifi 7, I'd be having to upgrade those routers again, so why not just do it right away while I'm at it? XD
I got the tp-link wifi 7 router as soon as it came out, but I didn't buy it for the wifi 7 lol. I bought it because its a reasonable price while also having all 2.5g ports, which was basically nonexistent before this router.
I got a little lost with the terminology, I need to do some research. Anyway, I liked that Wi-max would have such a long range, too bad that didn't happen.
That'd be right. I've been using AC for years and only just bought a Wifi 6 AX router - now there's 7 coming out. Typical LOL. Realistically though, it's only been the last 12-18 months I've seen wifi 6 ax and 2.5G LAN included as standard in most laptops and PCs. Even AX routers are still in the pricey mark and still only come with Gigabit LAN ports instead of 2.5G. 10G LAN is not even on the radar for most routers unless you have the dollars.
looks noisy, but will 6-7ghz reflect on wall better for indoor use ? few use case will be mesh backhaul which require range or just standard access point for faster sta connection. outdoor use will be nightmare with that much bandwidth... hopefully most of country decided to just give those channel needed for wifi 7 specs. I had bad experience with wifi 5 where regulation in the past limit bandwidth to just 20mhz but then few years after regulation lifted, hw manufacturer didn't bother to update those 20mhz hard limit or require further testing which takes almost a year after regulation changes.
Getting a Wifi7 router ... at least by the end of 2025. I'm most excited for its adoption in VR, ... Sorry, I mean to say "Spacial Computing" devices. Like the rumored Valve Deckard. Having tried to use a Quest2 off my PC via Wifi in my heavily congested apartment building the dropped packets and random desync stutter was incredibly frustrating. That's even with the Wifi6 router not only in the same room but also in direct Line of Sight at less than 10 ft away!
I just got WiFi 6e MESH, guess I'll stick with that for a while. I'm more curious about WiFi HaLow If I can use that for a challenging outdoor link. Speed is not that important because it's mostly for IOT, not for streaming. If I can get some streaming, that's just a bonus. edit: I know HaLow has different frequencies depending on location. For me, Europe/Norway is interesting.
It is a cool idea but I dont think I need it or that it is worth the money to upgrade because I would have to upgrade the devices using it too with the only reason being gaming my rig is good enough now.