Will AI Tools Kill SEO? 

Nice thought :) -Helen

That’s what I’m thinking!

Thanks for the feedback! :) -Helen

Nice thoughts, thanks for sharing! -Helen

Thanks for watching :) -Helen

Exactly!

If the majority starts to make their way to the middle of the pack, that leaves room at the top for those willing to do the work. Sounds good to me.

😂😂❤

Thanks for watching! -Helen

Happy to hear that! And welcome 🖖 -Helen

Glad you enjoyed it ✌ -Helen

Glad you liked it! 🙌 -Helen

👍

Happy to hear that! :) -Helen

😮😂

BROTHER 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Nice comment and looks like ChatGPT did well :) -Helen

Well, an actor can act as a surgeon but would you let this actor to do the surgery on you? -Helen

You are welcome! :) -Helen

👍

🙃

Thanks for sharing your experience! -Helen

Thank you for watching! -Helen

Thanks for sharing your thoughts :) -Helen

No worries! Just keep learning and practice a lot! ✌️ -Helen

@@AhrefsCom thank you 🥹❤️

We'll see 🖖 -Helen

Never tried to count :) -Helen

I don´t think that people wants to read some text artificially generated about the best hotels or travel spots instead of reading a real persn experience. Even if the AI content is accurate, what is not right now. It is just taking what is already in the web and that does not add much. You will get indexed, but I don´t think AI can rank better than a travel blog like the Booking blog or Trip Advisor.

​@@MartinZanichelli It's not about a real travel blog outranking a booking blog, Trip Advisor, or another site with AI content. It's about whether people go to any of those sites at all. ChatGPT already has an Expedia plugin coming out that will book your entire trip for you. It has a web browser plugin as well that will be able to answer any question you have about the trip and give you the same answers you're going to get from any website. There are also Chrome and Edge plugins that will summarize the current page for you and provide conversational Q&A about it. And I suspect before the year is over, Google will have something, possibly their new search engine, that will have all of these capabilities as well and more that we can't even think of yet.

@@wonmoreminute agreed. I get a sense that there's a hyperfocus on how search is in its current state and on making judgments of AI vs Humans within that context. But that's missing the big picture. I would rather travel from Texas to New York on a purebred horse than an old mule. But, at the end of the day, I'm definitely taking a plane.

I think your spot on. I don’t want to be negative because I know so many people have SEO as the cornerstone of their income generation one way “affiliates” or another “digital marketing SEO providers”. It’s literally just out of the box and look what it’s doing! Maybe more of a problem for Google is back engineering their EXACT algorithms for search results will be child’s play. You put in the top 5 for millions of serps and they will 100% work backwards and know exactly how and why everything ranks where it does. Now there is a difference between that and what we got now. Now it’s a very educated guess from very talented people that do have the human equivalent of back testing to learn from etc…. and have became close to knowing. But we still have so much that is unknown. What happens then? So fascinating. I tell you one thing when that does happen anything in the mix that you need to rank that involves time like domains age etc will have values thar skyrocket! Because in theory those items should be the only thing holding back from instant placement if someone has the real true algorithms. Makes me want to do nothing but buy domains and treat them like fine wine. The premiums will be disgusting

@@MartinZanichelli how’s the guy that made the video not going to reply on such a good comment yet like a reply that still doesn’t really address the comment? This reply is irrelevant if Google decides to show what it wants. Dummies

😂

🙌

Thanks! :) -Helen

No problem :) -Helen

Ah, those stupid statements. Look up the definition of NEVER. See, cars will NEVER replace the horse carriage. What about 100 years?

It already has and this is the Windows 3.1 version of it 👀

SOmetime accepting the reality is hard.

​@@manojmaitydmhello sir

Try yep.com/ ;) -Helen

@@AhrefsCom Ah, beta is live. Cool. But currently your AI is recognized the content of my website in a pretty funny way :)

Glad you enjoyed it :) -Helen

What is SEM...?

@@Nelson7r search engine marketing

@@denniszenanywhere so you mean doing marketing on websites...?

@nelsonramirez5289 SEM is more about PPC ads. We have a video about SEO vs. SEM: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-V2Kdl9Kuhio.html hope it helps :) -Helen

Thanks! Our video team is the best ☺ -Helen

We'll see! Thanks for sharing your thoughts anyway 🙏 -Helen

There is such a risk, right. -Helen

🙃

Was it that bad? 😅 -Sam

@@AhrefsCom sound so much like AI gave you this info to relay to us so we don't feel so much threatened while it actually took over underground! 🤣🤣🤣 Just kidding man, this is so on point and I totally agree with everything you said in this video. Big fan over here ❤️💜

And no one is ignoring it :) -Helen

You can always come up with your own analogies from the world of SEO :) -Helen

🙃

Did you watch the rest of the video? :) -Sam

@@AhrefsCom I did, yes. My comment was agreeing with you on this point because I've seen this false comparison made before. Probably as you have. We're on the same page.

To a certain extent now, yes :) -Helen

Until we arrive at predictive SEO where AI is delivering the info you need at the right moment before you even ask. We'll get there.

​@@SoulpunkTVshow Funny fact is AI search database for you to do SEO from search queries which optimized by SEO experts. lol So, SEO won't be dead.

I'm not sure what you mean. AI IS the search box. Every time we type something into a search box, we're asking an algorithm to give us an answer. As long as the answer remains a page of blue links we'll be okay. But that's up to Bing, Google, and user behavior and very little to do with AI at this point. GPT-4 (especially once connected to the web) will be more than capable of handing most queries. So it's not a matter of AI killing SEO. It already can for the most part. Now it's just a matter of how Google and Bing implement it, and how people use it. And the argument that AI can't create new content has nothing to do with whether people use it as their search engine (daily assistant, companion, or whatever) or not. If they do, traffic on sites will drop and people will stop creating new content for the web. So, we all lose. But it wouldn't be the first time people did something against their better long-term interests.

@@wonmoreminute about ai, requires data. Let's say you told ai to give you tips about how to make website indexing fast. Gpt will collect data on the highest success rate content which has well-optimized, plagiarism checked, and good review and then AI bakes its way and bring it on your table. How because those content was optimized by the SEO guy properly. Same as other niches.

@@Nadir-Ul-Kaysar-Handsome-VAI don't know about you, but I don't have time to spend hours, in some cases days as I do now, to create content optimized for search just so AI can bake it and put on someone's table. I, and most SEOs, do what we do so that people consume our content as it was written, already baked. I can't afford to spend my days shopping for ingredients and doing the food prep just so AI can prepare the finished meal and get all the credit. In other words, it doesn't matter if AI needs data. If people are not financially compensated for supplying that data, they'll be swapping out their keyboards for work boots to put food on their table. They won't have time to provide data. Again, this has nothing to do with AI at this point, or what AI needs. All we're waiting for now are the new search tools and how people use them. For example, there is no way that multiple companies are not right now working on a personal AI assistant like Jarvis that everyone will have in their ear. That's the holy grail of capturing consumer attention and loyalty. And anyone who has used GPT-4 on a daily basis knows how natural the conversation can be and how good a teacher it can be. As it continues to learn and token counts increase, it's going to be very hard to create content that can compete. People just won't consume content the way they do anymore. Yesterday I was signing up for a new tool and instead of going through the terms to understand the commercial rights and who maintained ownership of the content it helps create, I just copied the terms, gave to to GPT-4 and asked it questions. I think that's how most people will increasingly choose to consume content (minus the copy and paste), and the unfortunate result is that content creators can't monetize that.

We'll see :) -Helen

@@AhrefsCom and googles keynote yesterday should exactly what I was talking about. good luck

😅