WILLY WONKA: The REAL Evil Plan (Theory) 

veruca didnt have an interview IIRC

The book is different he has reporters flood his house

yeah true but its different in the books

idk it doesn’t make sense though

They didn’t have time. It was the next day

R O wow

Sounds like a plausible theroy. Which would explain why "Slugworth" was waiting for Charlie in the alley. How did he know that Charlie was going to go through there?

Or that other guy slugsomething

Yeah, I think he planted the coin for Charlie to find. I always assumed the kids were handpicked, and Wilkinsson planted their golden tickets. The rooms were specific traps for each kid. The contest was rigged so Charlie would win. I mean 5 white kids, roughly the same age, each find a golden ticket. Come on.

@@testodude your theory would explain why Wilkinson was always at each location immediately after the golden tickets were found.

Help Police *Murder*

No Don’t Stop

Yooo I’ve quoted that like my whole life when I wanna unenthusiastically tell someone to come back not even thinking about what it’s from lmao! It’s so sarcastic

Stop, dont come back.

Given the video, it makes perfect sense. The brats also deserve it though. 😈

Jared Schwartz literally as he said it I read your comment 😂

Jared Schwartz BRO 🤣🤣🤣🤣 that had me dead

JAYc official me to 😂

I bet she was piping mad about that remark, lol. She wasnt a pipsqeak she was a pipesqweak.

ye and hear mii out got me rolling lol

Prismen hahaha

Wow, it’s a miracle.

No shit Sherlock.

well damn this whole time i thought it was shit

HHAHSJWJHSJWHA

That's my theory...just like biff in back to the future, wonka gave himself the factory..coincidently biff..wonka look like trump..and charlie looks like a young Donald Trump..this is story about donald trump

Ozzy Morrison the heck

Me too!

That actually makes sense, Wonka travelling back in time to give his factory to a younger version of himself would ensure that Wonka would keep his business going for as long as he wanted.

I'm thinking what toxicnolos thinking so he's giving the factory to his younger self and Willy wonka from the tim Burton 2005 remake is Charlie from original Charlie and the chocolate factory and the Charlie from the tim Burton 2005 remake is a one from the future we haven't seen yet

That’s only in the Tim Burton version

@@camrose306 Right.

Grandpa Joe was lying in both versions of the story. He has never worked a day in his life . In fact, the remake makes it clear that Wonka has never met him throughout his entire career as a chocolate producer because the Oompa Loompas did all of the work.

@@Mikewee777 ?? Joe did work there in the remake. WIlly just doesnt recognize him because he never cared about his workers. He shut all of them out because he assumed they were spies. Wonka never got the Oompa Loompas until AFTER he had fired them all. In fact, we even SEE him working there

@@Mikewee777 In the retelling it's clear that Wonka DID have employees that included Joe BEFORE he found the Oompa Loompas, but due to espionage he laid off everyone and closed the factory for a bit. Later he found the Oompa Loompas and made a deal with them, they moved in to the factory, and production recommenced.

o_o that implies that charlie's mother was either unfaithful to her husband, raped by wonka, or worked as a prostituted and wound up pregnant before she married her husband in the movie. personally i think it's the final one because her family is really poor. both of her parents worked themselves to the point of barely being about to get out of bed or not at all. before charlie's dad came around, she was probably supporting them in this manner for most of her adult life, possibly getting pregnant from a client. assuming her husband knew her and was good friends and equally as poor, he married her out of a sense of duty and friendship so she wouldn't be alone raising a child and taking care of her parents. if she was a prostitute, this means that could be the biological father of the charlie and monitored how she would raise him. not always but often the poorer people are the most generous and humble as they know what it's like to have nothing and doors slammed in their faces. charlie growing up in such an environment could /possibly/ ensure that charlie doesn't turn out like the other bratty children. other children, i point out, were often really well off. a billionaire, butcher shop owners back then weren't exactly rich but they were in need for nothing. the TV kid's father was a college educated engineer of some sort, so he had money coming in. the bubble gum girl, (correct me if i'm wrong) was just made famous by her record setting. this fame went to her head and her parents doted on her when she flashed the "i'm famous" card. These could all be traits undesirous in an heir. so he monitored the prostitute he knocked up and devised a series of elaborate schemes just to ensure he's one of the chosen to "inherit" what he would have been given had he been born under normal circumstances... the rape theory applies to this aswell but i feel being a prostitute would be far less of a terrifying thing to endure mentally than a rape, as rape is a violation against your will and prostitution is willingly submitting yourself to perform sexual acts for money... sorry this is long, but this really got my theorizing juices flowing

Willy Wonka is not a rapist and I don't think he's the type of guy to rent a prostitute either. I think it makes more sense if they had a relationship before Mrs Bucket as married but it ended because Charlie's Mum didn't love Wonka, this fits the bill quite well. Willy Wonka has a girlfriend and loves her passionately, the girlfriend comes to the realisation that she doesn't feel the same way when she falls for another man called Mr Bucket. She tells Willy Wonka she loves somebody else and they have to part, this shatters Wonka and prompts him to throw himself into his work, shunning other people and ultimately becoming a recluse never leaving his factory and only having contact with his assistant and his workforce of Pygmies he finds much more agreeable than Western people. Meanwhile the woman discovers she is pregnant, her new boyfriend knows this is Wonka's child but still loves this woman regardless so they get married, Mrs Bucket has the child, they call him Charlie and Mr Bucket raises the boy as his own. Hope that made sense, this theorising is tiring and it's 2am here.

I was thinking Charlie was his son too. People had pre-marital sex all the time. A lot of women were/are ashamed of unplanned pregnancies, so she married the first guy who would take her before she couldn't hide it. I would wonder why Wonka didn't take care of her and the baby considering his wealth, but they don't explain much of his early life. Maybe she didn't tell him or maybe he wasn't free to choose because of his own family. I still think it's super plausible that Charlie is actually his own child.

I am not a Penguin I like the idea concepts amen

Also all the other kids have a parent of the opposite sex while Charlie's male grandparent accompanied him. What up with that.

Genius

Even looks like him

Rosiejo ! You would think wonka is too old to be Charlie’s father considering grandpa joe used to work for him, the factory must have been going on for decades.

Cliché

I could've sworn Charlie's dad was alive in the book. Maybe I'm thinking of something else, and this is some crazy Mandela effect.

Lork Lorkman ... well that's depressing

If he’d chosen 7 tickets he could’ve focused on the 7 deadly sins?

I know that was a surprise to me when I heard about that. Quite sad really that a certain popular like Ronald Dahl would be upset about not having a son.

Everyone's saying he's shallow. But many parents even today face gender disappointment. It doesn't mean they don't love their actual baby but they build up ideas of what this or that will be like with the child. Gender roles were more serious in roalds day than it is today. Boys were to take after dad. He probably didn't think he could raise his daughter to follow in his footsteps. Ideas like that were probably unfathomable. Even today when the notion that the sexes are "equal" and "gender is a social construct" is heavily pushed everywhere by everyone... Mothers and fathers still deal with gender disappointment even to crying and depression. It's a mental and emotional attachment you create to that particular dream child. Putting bows and dresses on your daughter or decorating the room with Dinos for your son. Or having the "perfect" 1 boy a s 1 girl family and not getting it. Whatever reason people have gender preferences, many many reasons from something as seemingly superficial to the type of clothes you buy all the way to wanting a child that is the same sex as yourself, can pass on your family name, carry your legacy, like the same things as you etc. It becomes deeply emotional. Women nowadays experience it more than men because we can see the baby's sex as early as 10 weeks through a blood draw and as late as 20 weeks with an ultrasound. We carried that child in our womb And in that time of carrying and hoping and dreaming and even imagining what our child will be like. It doesn't mean we don't like how they turn out. Just a little piece of that idea dies and so some of us (not me but I've known some) feel sad for the outcome. It's okay. And men back then certainly would not receive mental health assistance or psychiatric services. Shoot my granddad was much younger than Roald Dahl. He died in 2015. Suicide. Why? Because he grew up during a time when receiving psychiatric services was at minimum taboo. Had Mr Dahl gotten counseling or understood that he could still be fulfilled in a daughter he maybe would have never even written the beloved children's story we all love. Who knows? But maybe this story was therapeutic for him. And he expressed his sadness through writing. He probably adored his daughter. He saw his daughter in the character Miss Honey from Matilda. So obviously he loved her. It doesn't make the depression go away. Many artists draw from their pain. It's important that he worked through his feelings and was told enough to come out and discuss it. He shared his pain out loud. It seems shallow. But to many of us the reason other people are depressed seems "silly" and "insignificant" but depression is real pain that doesn't discriminate about how "insignificant" your hurt is. It still hurts. I appreciate his bravery and ability to draw from that.

Lexi the Lexiconist He wanted a legacy! A girl doesn't give you a legacy because she doesn't carry on your name! It might seem silly but that's how patriarchal societies work!

that's what I have been wanting

Of course there'd be some slight changes, but you know how most sequels have a similar story plot to the first

Soooo, Charlie and a chocolate factory , which came out already

Seth Allen did you completely miss the point in this comment? Lol hey said they should do a movie where CHARLIE IS RUNNING THE FACTORY. not a remake of the original movie lol

Gonk There's actually a Sequel in the Books called "Charlie & The Great Glass Elevator" where that's Exactly what happens, So that would be Pretty Sweet to see that on Screen. They go off into Space and fight off Aliens in that Book, No Joke LoL

I like the 2005 one too

YEP

Same

Always found him hella creepy

You think this is psychotic, you should see the musical.

Rhiannon Holland Wouldn't Charlie be envy? But then who would be lust? What if it's Wonka because he banged up Mrs. Bucket thus creating Charlie, his conspiratorial son?

And wrath is actually Mike TV cuz he's obsessed with killing people in video games. Slothfulness then goes to Grandpa Joe, fulfilling all 7 of the deadly sins with all 7 main characters

Augustus - Gluttony Verruca - Greed Mike - Wrath Violet - Lust Charlie - Envy Grandpa Joe - Sloth Willy - Pride

Sorry, but it doesn't fit. Wonka didn't show any wrath, and I don't know where you got lust from. Lust is strong sexual desire, which in absolutely no way fits Charlie. Also, you didn't include the seventh sin: envy

Not what lust means.. But ok..

"no one goes in, no one goes out."

Ginger Ninja love this

Dig it. Interesting

its just a wonka vator

The problem with that theory would be that the chocolate factory would only exist in a causal time loop, never existing past the point where wonka goes back to recruit himself, or would stop existing in the past, only coming in to existence when charlie comes forward to claim ownership.

I just remembered that movie existed

That's a good idea

That's a good idea

Cami .-. Yas please!

Yaaaaaasssss!!! Polar Express for life. Do It. Do It. DO IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

lmao my aunt likes the 1971 version more and doesn't know that the 2005 sticks to the book more. kinda an interesting test. people like to think that the older thing is better, even if it's not as close to the original as a newer thing.

But the 1971 version is still a better version

@@kobizarre2003 the book is better, technically

@@deseuryderia because something sticks closer to it's inspiration doesn't make it better lmao that's completely derivative. You can like any version better but to say the Tim Burton version is cinematically better is wrong. That isn't an opinion, that's based off film studies and character's psychology. Not to the mention the piss poor cast in the remake.

@@coldfireball6384 ok, but did i ask? ♥️

Hey! Thanks a ton! I'm subbed to ya.

Cody'sLab Funny seeing you here.

OH MY GOD!

Cody'sLab lsjr ifmxmte i. Gay teen u

Oh, hello cody

Seecooty XDDDDDD DDDDDDDD

Fifth Bird, plot twist: Willy Wonka was his real father, who abandoned him when he was born to take care of his factory, hoping someday he'll find his son again.

I0L X]

pinkstuff789able P that’s that’s... THATS JUST DEPRESSING

fifth bird: get to use the extent of his company ability

True

Except the fact you spelled his name wrong lol

kirby march Barcena a little late here but his book is really just an allegory of hell based on Dante’s Inferno

If the ball goes in the goal then it’s a goal

It isn't hidden.

,🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

No shit Sherlock.

You're pretty

Se7en simp

@@Leahjones598 Yeah . I really did have a simple moment ..

WTF WTF WTF WTF

Arely Reyna Oh my god i used to say what if charlie is wonks son right???!!

Any Evidence?

maybe willy wonka didnt have the factory at the time or was too busy so instead of having a kid he couldnt take care of he decided to give him away so the poor family took him in, but he kept an eye on charlie to make sure he'd be safe and when he was ready to give him the factory so he setup the tests and shit so that charlie could get it after

Why does the factory have so many rooms? Simple. The factory is secretly a T.A.R.D.I.S

Matt Cassidy maybe he wanted to be sure Charlie was perfect for the job.

you miss the whole point of the entire movie then... it was a test, Charlie wasn't supposed to know...

Does Wonka look like the type of guy who will take the simple way?

Matt Cassidy no offence but that would be a boring book/movie

Phoebe Hunter I'm just infusing a little reality into the situation. I agree though.

Willy Wonka: the personification of St. Valentine's Day.

um

Bahahaha!

*the X files theme plays*

In one of his books Charlie is trapped in chocolate mold

yeah 🤔

He was like, "stop, no, come back." As dry as dust Lol!

Agreed. He should be punished

Lol

Jimpresh//Vloging and more why

I did also.

I was just about to comment about that lol

are you my mummy?

sry your profile pic

Yeah lol

But Charlie's dad was present in both the movie and the book. He capped toothpastes until his job was taken over by robots. I could see it if Wonka was like some more distant relative, but considering he remained young despite the grandfather working there as a younger man, getting let go like the other employees and then becoming an old man, it's likely that Wonka isn't even entirely human, or at least different from the rest. In the second book, he literally takes them into space with his glass elevator and has intensive knowledge of the aliens and worlds outside of Earth. Charlie's mother doesn't hate the factory, she wouldn't really have given him the bars on his birthday especially since they were so poor. I can see how this theory might be plausible, but it does leave a lot of holes. There is a lot of information that is left unexplained in the books, so who knows?

Steph's Place 2009 And who is the mother?

No! In the first film he was DEAD.

Wait what he does

He Is Secretly Wonka

Cpt.Sprite yooooo

OMG NOOO you are so RIGHT

Wow he does 😂

Wonka is for assholes.

I think a few theme parks still do sell wonka bars, like universal studios fl.

me, i low-key miss them🥲

Them shits were 🔥🔥🔥

Sold

🙋‍♀️🙋‍♀️🙋‍♀️🙋‍♀️

Now this is a solid explanation thank you

That’s such a good analysis of the backstory!! 👏🏻👏🏻

He's dumping the factory to avoid OSHA fines.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-jD83QaWy8LI.html

@@keithduthie Jeeze, don't use your opinion as fact.

@@keithduthie matpat's theory was really stupid

read the book, wonka actually rescued the oompa loompas and brought them to his factory where they could gorge themselves on their fav food, cocoa beans.

I never really understood what was so bad about Violet.

Also, Charlie was just as bad, drinking that lifting potion. The original book didn't have that.

@@tell-me-a-story-obnoxiously chewing with your mouth open was a pretty big deal back in the day. Capital offense for the boomers.

Sammy Davis Jr. wanted that role _bad_ . I think it would have just been far too weird.

Oh heeeeeellllllll no that’s creepy

No Willy Wonka isn’t Jigsaw. Jigsaw is Kevin from home alone

@@dantdmfangamingrich9802 Why not all three?

The difference here,, is that willy wonka didn’t force those kids. Blame the parents.

Love this

Tim burton...? AH???

wrong movie nim wit

I know this isn't a Tim Burton movie turd nugget- I'm just saying

santa hoe's no need to be rude.....

Nice

Old Channel seems legit

Old Channel no one cares what you see and don't see

Old Channel your next

Old Channel Does it say " WILLY WONKA'S CHOCOLATE IS THE BEST IN THE WORLD, DON'T BELIEVE US? TRY ONE YOUR SELF!" and then you reach into the TV

The johnny depp version maybe, but none of that is mention in this version

Sir Aroun that is the newer oneb

Syed M no it is grandpa Joe said that he used to work there in this version

Arowyn Gardiner the grandpa never mentioned about being a former worker In the original one

Tyler Allen he did just watch it he said that he used to work there.

Not a good theory

Very good theory

cloudsweapon567 LOL

What a shit movie though

I'm guessing he needed to know for sure that he was worthy of handing his factory onto him.

Apollos 02 yea to spy on him

when he ate the microphone top lol

Doesn’t change anything

You'd be surprised how often something simple like that is employed by magicians, psychics and other bullshit artists.

That's what I always thought as well however it is strange that Wilkinson was in every interview

I think he had the rooms anyway

Well xander if you read the books you'll find that he had a lot more rooms and many of them were a lot stranger.

Vorkai Cyboulsky Wonka probably knew where the tickets were and sent wilksons there

The candy is called Wonka, that would mean the successor would have to change his name

I always thought that...

manof1005holds there’s no way. He told the story of how he started the factory in the movie.

Like the dread pirate Robert's!

Kourtney Nelson was it the truth tho?

Future President 3😨😨😨

well I guess I does kinda add up in apearence and personality

That would mean Charlie's mother cheated on her husband because Charlie already has a father. They just got lazy in the first movie and made him dead.

Melissa Lewis think stars wars movies they said lukes farther was dead but was he ?

Future President Nice theory!! His dad is probably his step dad

That does not matter. It still is at least five billion in 1971

Just elucidating the obvious.

it doesnt matter if there was only a thousand people in the whole world. it doesnt change the probability of those kids getting the tickets because it was set up.

Christina Nelmes LEARN JOKES

Crazy cow please explain to me what joke there even was to get? they made a statement. i made a statement. you chimed in with a shitty retort. the only joke here is you

yasss

Lmao

Wait, wait, hold up. Do they look round, like circular.? Or do they look round, like they look at things? Or both? So many questions...

so how would you be able to visualise that on camera even for cgi

JAMES COOK AND BUGSHOT LMFAO true

Snake Plissken he was

Doug A I've read it, your wrong.

Ross Hutchinson *You're And no, I'm not. "Slugworth" and the Ever-Lasting Gobstopper never mattered in the book. But what are they in the 1971 film? Major plot points. The candy shop with the employee who breaks out into song that gives out free candy to everyone except Charlie did not exist in the book. Squirrels got changed to golden eggs in the 1971 film for some reason. In both films and tge book, the Oompa Loompas sing a song at each child's exit from the tour. The 1971 film, for some reason, made up four slightly different songs, when the 2004 film has abridged songs from the book. The scene in which Charlie and Grandpa Joe belch in a fan chamber(?) is not only stupid, but didn't exist in the book; but then again, the 2004 one added some weird and unnecessary arc about Willy Wonka solving daddy-issues (?). The 1971 film keeps the fates of the children ambiguous, while neither the book nor the 2004 film do this. One thing I found strange is that neither film adaptation or really _any_ adaptation retained the detail that the children brought with them *both* parents; it was only Charlie who brought one grandparent, which helped to further establish the fact that he is different from the other children. Instead, all adaptations choose to have one parent accompany their child.

*the book

Doug A I think we can all agree that the original film is FAR superior to Tim Burton's film, even if Burton's is more faithful to the book.

Doug A Was the whole plot line about Wonka's father in the book?

I was think about that lol

Oh definitely, but he was also spying on them

He also knew something about Charlie...he said he’d read his story in the paper...we, the audience weren’t able to see that article

@@sunflower_1918 tbh i dont remember even writing the comment i made- so i am gonna go off of what i had said XD Perhaps he had made them before, but strategically show areas of the factory which would lure each specific child to their demise.

@@sunflower_1918 XDXD

That is implying that money was ever an object for Wonka...probably recouped the expenses for those rooms, though, before dumping that world of (brand new, at the time) OSHA violations off on a young boy.

I never said it was.

I know I was talking about the other theories

joeladin 0204 Oh :D

joeladin 0204

joeladin 0204 A child is pretty necessary ingredient for satanic chocolatiers.....

OMG I never thought about that!

Waitttt but what about Agustus tho I can’t spell isn’t he like German

@@cheniemarcalantas8843 he still spoke english...

All white. I'd think atleast one would have been asian or Indian 🤔

@@Splexsychiick Asian or Indian? Indians are Asian.

xMichxllx i cried so hard when it was on the news

Ik so sad

his name was Jerome Silberman.

George Bsuh::::GOD DO I EVER HATE THAT!!!!!!Why can't Hollywood(Hellywood)EVER let people KEEP their ACTUAL name?!?!?!?!?!

D`:

Gabrielle Stewart what does it mean if u know the answer?

The Tinkerer - "Nobody ever goes in, and nobody ever comes out".

Gabrielle Stewart I had an idea of how ironic it all was 🤔 but didn't think any more of it

Gabrielle Stewart I just thought that he was a cannibal and he made kids into candy and his job was to kill kids or making em into chocolate

Quite simple really. The reason is because cutlery salesman and sharpeners were quite common during the time period of the film. Want more evidence check out Oliver during the "Who will buy" number

LittleMissTardis 11 Not hershey

Whichever chocolate came up with the Wonka brand extension. :D

CartmanFrost11 Cadbury's Chocolate.

Precisely! In my upcoming video analyzing the 2005 version, I dwell on that factor a bit too :D

Boom, can't wait.

Just has to avoid charges of fraud if it gets out the game was rigged. Lol

okay thank you I was just rewatching the movie and I got a little curious

Kelley moultrie

yes?

CHOCOLATE

CHOCOLATE

Omfg! Dead! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@borianatam8556 AHAHA FINALLY.

chocolate i remembr wen thay made chocolat

Lyra Ryan Dahl was a creep so who cares

Yo Kennedy​​ wow, calling the author of the book that the movie is based off of a "creep" and misspelling his name too. -_-

geekqueen2010 what was spelt wrong?

geekqueen2010 How was he creepy tho ?

Qq Chin​ Yo Kennedy spelled Roald Dahl as "Ryan Dahl". NatFillion S​​ I didn't call Dahl a creep, Yo Kennedy was the one who did that.

No it's not xD

Stinkyink but its way worse

@@popot4627 yes it is, it's way closer to the book

Dr. Sabertooth yesss. I skipped that part so many times because it creeped me out

it's a tunnel

Its an omage to the 5th circle of hell in Dantes Inferno! The images on the wall of the tunnel are meant to bring up feelings of fear and anger.

Ya he should make a theory on the weird tunnel

What theory? it's just a tunnel designed to fuck with people.

Never seen it

Make theories on star wars!

that movie is so crazy and mysterious if just maby u end up seeing it plz make a theory

Agreed

its on netflix

Omfg the flying elevator thing 🙊

Heda Kom TriKru dude it's a police box. It even says so on the "flying elevator thing." 😂

I believe its V.R. or maybe just maybe Its a whole He's in a coma

Your acting like half a 'Tard'is yourself

Have you READ Dahl's second book ' Charlie And The Great Glass Elevator ' ? He may as well have called it 'Doctor Who' and be done with it .

Because Grandpa Joe is a greedy old lazy man

Because he wanted to go into the factory one last time.

The old geezer didn’t get his ass up to help his family in poverty

He was probably too depressed to move. And cabbage water soup ain’t gonna fortify his joints or psyche so he got stuck in his sedentary way of life, especially after his son-in-law passed and calamity seemed to keep rearing its ugly head.

because he didnt want his mom riding willy wonka or tryna suck him off for money. it would have been embarrassing for him