Visit brilliant.org/TFC/ to get started learning STEM with a 30 day free trial, and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual premium subscription - Sponsored by Brilliant.
So I came here from nebula to talk, say @TheFridayCheckout. Will there be a nebular comment section at some point and a like button. I wanted to show support but these functions are probably not necessary but I still miss them. 😅😂❤
The most strange thing is that right now Canon can create 5nm equivalent chips using this technique that is the high end of what ASML machines make after years of development and billions of dollars in R&D. I really want these methods to be successful so that the world shouldn't rely on only one company. 💚
I don't know why people here seem to pretent Canon would just drop this stuff out of nowhere. They also have decades of experience making lithography machines and were the market leader until ASML came around with their competitive processes at smaller node sizes. Sure, competition in this space is certainly welcome given that ASML is also kind of the bottleneck for many investments into the semiconductor space. But for that to come into fruition, many more things must go right before this stuff will be adapted (yields must be decent, etc). Also, TSMC is now working with a 3nm process node already, so given that and the time it requires to build a new fab, ASML is still in the lead for min 4 years.
Windows 11 made me consider switching to Linux but now with 12 im 100% doing it...not just because of the UI but how much more aggressive microsoft is getting with violating user privacy. Plus Linux has caught up so much the last few years...not like in the past where you could not use 99% of app or not play most games. There is almost no downsides to Linux anymore.
When it comes to how small Cannon can go. Even if they can't get as small as they may want to. That doesn't mean the technology is useless. The majority of chips, especially in house hold items and even some other applications, this can still work. At the fraction of the cost and energy needed to make the chips.
True. Especially for bigger items like cars where space is not constrained the chips need not to be small and they can use good old fashioned techniques to create one.
Releasing a new OS is a good way to increase the perceived obsolescence of Windows 10. Idk how much that contributes, but I'd imagine people at Microsoft are aware of it. As of last week, Windows 10 is now under two years away from end-of-life as currently scheduled, with over double the install base of the two-year-old Windows 11.
@@fontenbleau Yeah, I'm gonna reinstall Arch Linux on a secondary SSD to dual-boot it alongside Windows 10 until it will eventually reach it's end-of-life, and so then I will fully commit to Linux. Or I will just use Linux and have a Windows 10 virtual machine instead - not sure.
I have win11 on one notebook, otherwise win10. Win10 are not looking great, but it's a good thing, OS should draw is little attention as possible. Win11 are somewhat cleaner, but many things are just one mouse click further, I don't hate them, but I can't name anything that's better. Maybe file explorer which I don't use, maybe window management, but win10 have powertoys and fancy zones. To be honest, they might be a little faster, but it might be fault of my other notebook, which feels pretty slow overall. If I don't like something, then it's copying macos, gnome or android. Desktop is desktop, period. It's meant for work and multitasking. People with 12" notebooks may argue. But for these we have completely unnecessary top panel which basically displays notifications and clock? Really?
"As of last week, Windows 10 is now under two years away from end-of-life as currently scheduled, with over double the install base of the two-year-old Windows 11." This isn't even new. This happens with every OS gen. It's amazing, really.
I feel like that every version of windows after win-98 has been closer to being like Mac-OS and I hate it. Worst of all they often block the old features so you're forced to live with their changes.
i dont care if it at the top or bottom or wherever but windows really needs a dock of some sort, like 75% of my taskbar is deadspace and i dont even have a second monitor
I think in the nanoimprint lithography you would still need the traditional lithography machines to make the mask, it would be cheaper if the mask can be used multiple times but innovation in traditional machines would still be needed
I feel like every version of windows just pushes more and more popups, pushes to use their subscriptions, and ads. Every version I upgrade to on my PC makes me appreciate MacOS on my macbook more and more haha
00:00 📰 Windows 12 leaked, expected in 2024. Microsoft hints at future versions. 01:10 🖥️ Windows 12 likely won't bring major visual changes; possible taskbar shift. 01:39 🧠 Focus on ARM PCs and enhanced AI features in Windows 12. 02:20 🧩 Canon's Nano imprint lithography could revolutionize chip-making, potentially reducing costs. 03:58 🤖 Xiaomi's "hyper OS" is an updated Android skin, not a new operating system. 06:01 📱 Apple's wireless update pad allows in-store iPhone updates without unboxing. 06:29 ✏️ New Apple Pencil introduced; $79 cost, recharged via USB-C, lacks wireless charging and pressure sensitivity. 06:57 📱 OnePlus Open and Oppo Find N3 launch with competitive foldable designs. 07:12 👍 RU-vid's new feature illuminates "like" and "subscribe" buttons when mentioned. 07:26 💰 Ferrari to accept cryptocurrency as payment; Quacq partners with Google for RISC-V chip development. 07:54 🤖 PwC partners with OpenAI for AI consulting on complex matters in tax, legal, and HR.
Windows 12 most likely will come out when Intel 15th gen and AMD 8000 CPUs are on the market. The reason why is they are the ones that will have the hardware to run windows 12. So late 2024 / early 2025 for earliest you can get a Windows 12 computer. I don't know Snapdragon well enough to tell you if can already run on their current SoC or will need the 2024 updated version to be able to run.
With how strict Microsoft has been with Windows 11, I would suspect there could be stricter requirements for Windows 12. Very few computers have NPUs so it will be hard to push for people to upgrade to Windows 12 if that is a requirement, but it seems like Microsoft is more interested in selling new computers than supporting old ones, lol.
@@adwaitsharma6915 the ones in GPUs are just often used for very specific things and not used generally. But maybe they can be used in general with a driver update. But Windows 12 isn't out nor officially announced so nobody knows what it requires, it is all speculation.
that won't work with the company... then again... most companies still use computer till it mummified and belongs in a museum... ( the likely targets for this OS is the win10 PC replacements... IMO)
@@PrograError enterprise users will pay for extended support if they need it otherwise they often just buy new computers with new version of Windows. Otherwise companies that already buy old hardware to run old OS for the particular software they still need. Most people just use the OS that came with the device and primarily only gets a new OS with a new computer (thereby lots of smaller companies and people that keep running unsupported Windows versions). If Microsoft cared for the computers that cannot officially support Windows 11 they wouldn't have put such strict requirements for Windows 11. I don't think the next version will have fewer requirements. At best Microsoft will just lower the requirements for Windows 11 instead of extending the support for Windows 10, if Microsoft cares for so many computers running unsupported Windows 10 by the time it no longer has support (presumably Windows 12 is out by that time).
I hope that Windows 12 will still allow you to install a 3rd party start menu and taskbar. I hate the way that Windows 11 removed the "never combine taskbar items" option. I have a large widescreen monitor with lots of taskbar space and like to see all open windows on the taskbar at the same time!!!
@@kiradotee Haha obviously not. Using StartAllBack as a 3rd party start menu and taskbar. It allows you to change it back to any version of Windows you want. I customise my start menu to look like windows 10 but has the all programs pop out style of windows XP.
@@orbitalsan4013 maybe if it flops even harder than win11 did maybe MS will concider just keeping win10 around. (wishfull thinking, the only thing i want is security updates, i don't care for "more new features" i'm satisfied with how it is now)
I really wonder how easy it would be for a hacker to flash custom software to iPhones without opening the box. Surely they will find a vulnerability at some point
Ferrari will never really accept Crypto. They're notorious for their exclusivity above anything than the "entry" models. You have to second-hand own a top-tier model and even attend Ferrari events to be even put on a list to buy a new one. That news is total marketing bs.
I guess Windows 11 really boosted PC sales so they are trying to release new version of windows more frequently. But i don't expect any fundamental changes to windows...
@@whitygoose more like they woke up to the uselessness of a mobile based design on a PC architecture ... win8 design never worked that's why they released 8.1...
@@PrograError yeah.. it's the opposite, i want PC experience in my phone. thing as stupid as unable to minimize window so i can listen to youtube while doing another stuff is mindbogling. and file explorer is just so shit in any phone. the new window manager from oneplus open looks promising but realy expensive.
The vast majority of Win 10 users didnt need to go to 11, it offered basically nothing, same as 12. ... it will offer nothing that the majority of users need...put the task bar, and system tray wherever you like..as long as i can move back where i want it...
I have ALWAYS ran my taskbar on the top, ever since I had an Atari Mega 2 ST in the late 1980s. Forcing users to keep the taskbar on the bottom of the screen is a complete deal breaker for me!
There's basically no reason to ever upgrade your desktop processor every year, so why bother re-designing them that often? Personally I'm on a 10 year desktop processor upgrade schedule now.
Windows 11 looks like a cartoonish version of mac os but does not function like the typical window. The basic functionality of newer versions of windows functions like mac os instead of sticking to what made windows easy to use and understand like the older versions of windows. Alot of older versions of windows were done automatically after you done something and there were permissions that you enabled and it was easy to use and understand. Now windows 11 has turned into mac os where everything has to be done in a certain way manually and it takes multiple steps to do basic tasks since the basic tasks are hidden behind extra menus. I never understood how to use and navigate mac os from the very beginning since it's a learning curve. It took me awhile to figure out how to finally use mac os. With mac os, you have to do everything manually instead of things done automatically for you with options to choose from when you grant the permissions. For example, when you sideload a 3rd party app, you have to look for the 3rd party downloaded folders app and than drag and drop it. For windows, when you sideload a 3rd party app, a window would pop up with permissions and asked you where do you wanna save the app to without looking for a folder and than dragging and dropping the 3rd party app. To uninstall a 3rd party app on mac os, you have to do the steps in reverse order just when the 3rd party app is sideloaded. On windows, you just right click and select uninstall app. I tried to right click on mac os and I tried to do the same thing like windows and the 3rd party app still does not get uninstalled. It took me awhile that I had to figure out that I look for the folder where the 3rd party app was dragged and dropped and than drag and drop the 3rd party app to the recycle bin. Mac os should not have just done the basic right click option to uninstall and delete 3rd party apps that were sideloaded. With mac os there are permissions and windows there are permissions. Windows and android has some similarities when sideloading 3rd party apps and uninstalling and sideloaded apps. The 3rd party apps that I used for windows you have to pay, with android, you can get similar apps that you can sideload. For windows, there are free 7 day or 30 day trials. For android, you can just sideload the apps. I still sideload android apps all the time even with older versions of android since I still use the same apps that were no longer supported or removed from the google play store due to copyright of reasons. The only thing that I like about windows 11 is support for android apps. I'm still trying to figure out how to sideload the google play store on windows 11 instead of using the amazon app store. When I try to sideload the necessary google apps to enable and use the google play store on windows 11, they won't download and install. Nothing happens when I try to sideload any of the necessary google apps on windows 11. I just end up using alternate android app stores to sideload 3rd party apps. Like the modded version of youtube to bypass the ads and have the same features as the paid versions of youtube and I even have the modded version of spotify to bypass the ads on spotify.
I don't know about the history of previous Windows versions, but releasing Windows 12 before dropping support for Windows 10 seems weird to me. Also, most people I know still haven't upgraded to Windows 11 yet
When Windows 10 was released, Vista, 7, 8 and 8.1 all had support, so that probably won't be a reason to not release 12 before 10's support is coming to an end. And also, Windows 7 had a much bigger market share than Windows 8/8.1 when Windows 10 came out.
10 is supported until late 2025, so I can see a lot of 10 users skipping 11 completely and going right to 12. This of course assumes they have a newer pc which would be compatible with 11 and 12's security (motherboard) requirements
For most users, the frequency of Windows 10 updates slowing down after 2025 would be a good reason to keep using it for as long as they can keep the hardware running. Windows 11 and 12 are not faster, the settings are more restricted, and it supports less software. I know absolutely no one looking forward to upgrading a Windows machine, even if it was completely free. When their machine finally dies, they resort to second hand machines to try and postpone the inevitable OS update.
I don’t know if this is an unpopular opinion or not, but I actually wanna experience Windows 11. I didn’t got a chance to Experience Windows Vista and 8.1 but I actually have better hopes into this OS. And I actually think it’s easier to say goodbye to Windows 10 than 2000,XP and 7 because I found Windows 10’s layout the most boring and simplified one of them all. I actually think Windows 11 did slightly better. Seeing this preview makes me afraid Windows 12 won’t look like the past Windows versions anymore because the taskbar is no longer fully overlapping the bottom screen like how it was all the time. Despite a lot of people have their thoughts about Windows 11 being not very good, I do actually somewhat like it and would like to experience it because the new MS Paint version.
@@infernal-toad Windows 11 is a better Windows 10 IMO. Windows are more rounded and detailed. To me it looks even better than 10. I've been using Windows 11 now for a year and no issues. I love it.
@@riseabove3082 That’s good to hear. Honestly the only issues of Windows 11 I can think of are probably just minor issues. Nothing problematic compared to ME, Vista and 8.x. And if you don’t like drastic changes (which is definently gonna happen with Windows 12), then why are there a bunch of people that wanna Skip Windows 11?
I already switched to Linux. Microsoft's new "privacy" policy and data collection is simply outrageous and unacceptable. Windows is now unusable for the private individual.
Talking about overly conscious of privacy and data collection while having a Google account and on a Google platform is simply ridiculous and laughable.
@user-xz5mh2ev2e You don't understand the concept of choice then? I choose to use Google services.... I choose the data I give. You don't have ANY choice using Windows, it gets EVERYTHING. Not understanding this simple concept is simply ridiculous and laughable.
"Windows is now unusable for the private individual." Linux is also my daily but... you're genuinely nuts. Do you also think they put robots in the drinking water? (You can turn off all of the targeted ads, tracking, analytics etc, too. If you're such a "for choice" user... then why didn't you do that, kiddo?)
It's gonna take a lot to make me want to go to windows 12 after the dumpster fire that 11 was and still is wrecked my machine. Absolute nightmare to deal with all the bugs and awful UI, tooltips were annoying in win10 but they make win11 literally unusable when they won't go away and block buttons I need.
They never finsihed "cleaning up the design" for Windows 11. There are still LOTS of light themed apps/menus when in dark mode. Lots of things to finish but probably never will.
Windows12 needs a stripped down game mode. And not a game overlay bs thing, I mean booting the Windows kernel with the bare minimum you need to play games.
The Windows 12 sub thing was already disproven by the original source, so it's not really a good look to reference another article still pointing to the original fud.
Given the visual improvements in 22H2 the past weeks, I see some good improvements. I am very curious of Windows on ARM. In the past they have not been very successful, well.... it flopped.
Question: Contrary to phone updates, I feel like lots of people prefer not to upgrade to the next version of Windows. Why is that the case? Genuine question.
I think it's generally because it's a completely different OS, as compared to phones (where you can just press 2 buttons and upgrades are fast) and what works works. I'm actually still on Windows 7.... (well, I'm about to upgrade off to Windows 10 LTSC 21H2) only because it still works fine and I have no need to upgrade - since Windows 7 does everything I need it to. Additionally, upgrading COULD mess up my projects, leading to valuable time that's wasted trying to fix it up. I'm not saying it will, but better safe than sorry.
I think because they break too many things while phone updates are usually very stable. Plus PC os updates are boring but phones get more new features that people are hyped on. The hype might be just due to better marketing.
Up until Windows 10, previous 'new' Windows versions were marketed as entirely separate products and sold as such. They had their own update life cycles (service packs, anniversary updates, etc...) also usually drastically increased minimum and recommended hardware specs so it made more sense for users to buy new PCs every other or so Windows generation (Eg XP to Vista). Starting from Win 10 tho, it does seem like they're headed towards rolling updates and treating it as one Windows, similar to Mac OS and Android/iOS, presumably to limit fragmentation. Ironically, Win 10 was supposed to be "the last version of Windows" but then Microsoft and OEMs realized they sell way more PCs when new major Windows versions get announced sooo they're in this middle boat of making updates seamless and fluid while marketing higher numbers it seems, Win 11, Win 12 etc...
I'm hoping that windows 12 is a completely new NT core because Windows 11 only really updated visuals. The visuals are great but imagine a rewritten NT core that could rival the performance of linux.
One day I started my windows 11 laptop. Since it's really slow I seen windows 10 taskbar for 2 secs. When I play sometimes the game chrashes and I see the Windows vista default aero theme. And when even explorer crashes I see the icons from windows 95 And that's all, so basically windows 11 is windows 95 with just better UI lol
@@uusfiyeyh I'm not saying they should replace the NT core, just that it could use a huge upgrade. If large parts of it were rewritten it would have performance like linux but I don't expect them to do that. Also DOS was a large part of windows but they still replaced that.
the like and subscribe only works the first time is mention when the second time you say it is not light up. I want to think that youtube did this on purpose so the people not abuse of that.
I guessing it if they think everyone has a 8gen CPU for windows 11 i7 7gen CPU able to run windows 11 better than is than a i5 8gen CPU I thinking windows 12 may need 12gen CPU to be supported
I just hope Microsoft finnaly made more UI versions for single Windows. Like making one UI for tablets, PCs and for normal users and technically more advanced users same time obvisiously isn't working.
I'm definitely holding back buying new pc until intel comes up with its own M3 arm chip version, as there a massive difference in video editing speeds and most importantly electric use & heat produced is way less then current Intel i7 10th gen
Instead of making seperate version why not make Windows 11.1 as minor OS version of Windows 11 because overall still pretty looks like Windows 11 styled but with detached taskbar, copilot, etc
NEW Windows 12 with NEW features like: + More Spyware + More Spyware + More Bloat + More Ads + AI tools that will never be used - All of the features that you used in 10 and 11 - Backwards compatibility * Required TPM 3.0. * Required Camera even on desktops. * Required 8 core CPU. * Required RTX 2050 or newer.
I would have upgraded my OS to 11 if they didnt try tell me I needed a whole new CPU for my desktop and which means a brand new laptop. Unless windows 10 starts to break from lack of support im not getting windows 11 or 12 with restrictions like that.
Windows 11 is... a UI downgrade, at least for me. It is so dumbed down it lost quite a few features, while the under-the-hood areas stayed exactly the same, as in kernel and codebase. It's just a reskinned 10. If 12 will be again a minor tweak instead of offering a proper quality upgrade, it will be the end of Windows for me. I accept 10 just because it's stable now, with updates disabled. I hate how it treats the user without disabling every. single. annoying. "feature"., when it thinks it knows better what I want to do with my PC than I do. 11 is now ugly af. It looks like a mix of Android and MacOS ripoff. I think of switching to Plasma Arch in the future. I'm glad Valve made great tools for Linux gaming
