Go to our sponsor betterhelp.com/explanes for 10% off your first month of therapy with our sponsor BetterHelp. Join over 4 million people who've met with a therapist on BetterHelp and started living a healthier, happier life.
@@Bobspineable Those contracts usually have stipulations to get out in the case of association becoming damaging. Even if he doesn't go that path he could just not renew the contract going forward.
1 attended the airshow too and had a whale of a time. The highlight was getting to go aboard the Embraer E2 and get a sneak peak of what to expect when Scoot takes delivery this year. Sad our paths didn’t cross, but I hope you enjoyed your time in Singapore, Coby.
There is also a winner, which is the A330neo. Not a lot of orders placed for this jet, but with Vietjet placing an order for 20, at least it put more confidence to the A330neo family.
The A330neo was certainly a winner. It got 23 orders in the airshow which is big as the jet has not been selling much before especially in southeast asia (after AirAsia's cancellation of 60 units).
GE didn't want 35K to hurt sales of 77W, which GE90 had a monopoly. But an engine option only available to 359 is not attractive. Meanwhile CFM Leap is a heavier engine that isn't very suitable for smaller aircraft like A220 and E2. Also as long as the issues are fixed, GTF is a more efficient engine at EIS, and the gap is widened with the advantage package.
@@VideoDude6475 Scoot ordered from Embraer way before the Singapore Air Show. The first delivery to Scoot is expected to take place in March 2024. This will be the first E2 in the SEA region.
In summary, the biggest winner of the Singapore Air Show is... COMAC. 😮 The C919 is not as advanced as the A320neo or the 737 MAX. However, China wants to invest in this aircraft with a new home-grown engine and maturity through commercial operation and international certification. If the C919 can prove itself, airlines - including African carriers (some of which have ties to China) - will buy their aircraft, and COMAC will become a global player in the competitive aviation industry. This, couple with quality control issues and losing grip in the freight market, will leave Boeing executives nervous despite the 45x 787 order with Thai.
Yeah even if its stats and efficiency doesnt compete much, you can tell their making actual effort to make an aircraft that would be reliable even using a CFM LEAP 1C like the Leap 1B on 737 max and Leap 1A on a320 neo.
I doubt that the Max10/Max7 will pass legislation and FAA approval for at least a few months because the Max8 has safety concerns, the Airbus court case is now over and has been fixed, and the air show shows low demand for Boeing aircraft compared to Airbus
The one that has issues was the Max9, not 8 and the number of planes that were affected due to the safety concerns was very little as it only affected Max9 planes with plug-in doors only. I flew the Max jets with Air Malta on Thursday and there's no issue with it
That’s quite a feat for Taiwan to support 3 international airlines, I wonder if China Airlines will ever rebrand, cause I have heard first hand people being hesitant to fly with them, not knowing they are actually a Taiwanese airline.
@@user-fq5vl3fl1b you obviously have not met Taiwanese people to make that claim. The older generation may have said that, but the vast majority of the younger generation consider themselves Taiwanese now.
@@Evil.Totoro If their self identity can change in 10-15 years in the past, it also means they will also realize they are Chinese after China takes it over and re-educates them. The people living on the island are very easy to manipulate, even with their self identity. I doubt they will ever resist when China pulls the trigger to take it back.
I hope Boeing is able to re-engine the 767. FedEx and UPS have their A300’s that will eventually need to be replaced, the -300’s easily able to. Getting a -200F back on the market would be a good option for several carriers.
GE and Airbus had talks between 2019-2021 for an alternative A350 engine, but they couldn't agree for some reason. So RR stayed the exclusive engine for A350 until 2030. Airbus needs to subsidize RR until that time. A350 program is very profitable, thus they have the margin to do that.
Airbus are selling the A350 around the world, it has full order books and both Airbus and RR are prospering. Why should Airbus 'bust a gut' to get GE onboard the programme, just to satisfy a few US airlines, who apart from Delta, are blinded by nationalism against buying both widebody airframe and engine from Europe, when there is an American alternative (despite the fact that Americans long ago maintained a preference for Japanese cars to their own)? Besides, even if that exclusive deal between Airbus and RR didn't exist, why would Airbus wish to rock the boat with Rolls, just as those UltraFan developments are being sidewise applied to existing Trent engines, especially perhaps the XWB-97 on the 350 1000? I wouldn't rule out Emirates buying the 1000 yet. With the economic rise of Asia, commercial aircraft can be a great success in the world without making much of a dent on the US market, and its principally US operators who want to buy GE. And whether the GEnx will be affected by the powdered metal problem, as warned, is something only time will tell, but maybe United need to firm up those A350 orders, as soon as, for insurance, incase GE powered B787s ever get grounded, and let's face it, United are never going to find enough excuses to buy the Trent 1000....... edit: gr
@@bringbackmd7579 If your reply is meant for me, say so buddy. The YT comment section is not difficult. And I didn't invent the powdered metal problem, and I didn't issue a warning about it in connection with GEnx engines either, so best Google your own facts before 'shooting the messenger".......
Great video although I think you missed two loosers. 1: The Embraer E2 program or just Embraer as a whole and 2: Singapore Airlines 🇸🇬 I know it may seem shocking or silly to say but at such a MAJOR airshow in the carrier’s home country and not placing A SINGLE order for a new jet type or adding to a fleet or order book seems very odd. 🤨 I fully expected Singapore Airlines to announce they’d order the 777-8F to replace their aging Singapore Cargo 747-400s. Additionally, I expected a big Singapore Airlines announcement for the 777X being that of the 777-8 & 777-9 as they fly A lot of 777-300ER jets that the 777-8 is a natural successor for and the 777-9 that is an excellent 747 replacement especially since they have a capacity mismatch just like some other former 747 operators who’ve ordered the 777-9! 😂 VERY ODD! 😳
So Airbus is losing orders because Rolls Royce has evaluated the actual cost of the engines and servicing... Leading to higher prices and customers not wanting to pay those higher prices, despite those same customers raising their prices for all their travellers citing Inflation that everyone is dealing with...
Having travelled on China's incredibly well engineered high speed trains (I was able to stand a coin on its edge while doing 320 km/h), I will have no problem at all.
So Airbus is losing orders because Rolls Royce has evaluated the actual cost of the engines and servicing... Leading to higher prices and customers not wanting to pay those higher prices, despite those same customers raising their prices for all their travellers citing Inflation that everyone is dealing with... If Airbus wants to secure those deals, perhaps they should evaluate the cost of losing those orders vs subsidizing their only engine provider for that airframe until RR either stabilises their finances or the Airbus company uses their negotiation skills to find an engine provider in Europe. Or they can reduce their profit margin by paying the subcontractor properly for the product they provide.
I actually genuinely agree with you and finally some one who l found in the comment section that actually has a functioning brain for once and you actually couldn't have said that actually any better.
Having worked with subcontractors in various civils and infrastructure projects, it's baffling that RR is even involved with the negotiations, it's an Airbus sales team with a RR rep to explain the engine and invitation to RR manufacturing if they have more specific questions. Even if there were different engine options, I would say that's Airbus and a SKU/option to tick, not inviting that company up to negotiate. TLDR: Silly of Airbus to not take total ownership. @@user-gu8qi4me8x
GE Aerospace always wins 😎 the Trent XWB is so overrated, with a dispatch reliability rate of just 99.91% (compared with the 99.98% dispatch reliability rate of the GEnx, which by the way has proven itself to have twice the reliability of the Trent 1000), and the GE9X is more efficient. Unlike any of those Trent engines, you won't have to worry about those hollow titanium fan blades spontaneously disintegrating on a GE90/GEnx (and GE90/GEnx reliability and durability has been proven to be superior to anything from RR as well).
Should have added another loser, the aerial displays. Rather sad state. Only the Black Eagle from Korea display stood out. Missed the August 1st from China, Russian Knights and Al Fursan from UAE.
@@f0x4nn3 TXWB84 actually has a very solid operational record, that even Tim Clark and Al Baker said it's fine. The problem is engine pricing and service contracts that hampers 359 in winning against 787s. TXWB97 was criticised by Tim Clark, but that's on 35K.
They lost orders from Thai airlines. They lost, doesn't matter who or why. I love Airbus planes but I don't get all emotionally wrecked if they lose to Boeing on an order...
@@derbagger22 Actually yes. Thai is actually a Trent 1000 user, but this order is exclusively GENx. Its CEO also openly complained of RR's pricing. Meanwhile it acquired quite a number of A350s from lessors to satisfy its immediate need. That's why many including Coby speculate the engine is the deal breaker.
Looks like in the first quarter of the 2024 season the 787 keeping boeing thriving. Once they figure out the 737-9 and maxes, as well the 777x it's going to bee huuuuge for Boeing.
@@derbagger22 that's true, especially with the 737 maxes. But Emirates rolled the dice and made a huge order for the 777x. As I don't think Emirates is in the business of losing lol one of the best in the business.
Thanks for your amazing coverage 👍🏾. As World Events of the last 4 years clearly indicate, no one can tell the future or what lies just around the corner! Time and only time will tell what the Universe sprinkles on us. Hypothesising anything about the Aviation Industry is NOT healthy at all. However we wish everyone well, safety and inner peace to find a Balance because after all, these Manufacturers belong to Planet Earth and shouldn’t be pitched against each other 💫❤️🙏🏾
You don't need a therapist, just quit getting stressed out so much and relax more Enjoy yourself and have more fun on your trips.Take care bro.Lee Crolley,lll Lexington,S.C.29073
Its not teething issues thats plaguing the 737Max. Its a systemic problem within Boeing it self. They are being run by money people instead of engineers which means profits over quality is all they care about. Just look to Intel for what happens when you have "business" people run the company. They get lazy, take their lead for granted and put on blinders to reality while the competition (AMD) passes them while giving them the two middle fingers.
@@Frangus_ i understand that. but until boeing sorts out its corporate issues, boeing should not rush the 777x. and i do agree that boeing made a shitty mistake when they let the MD accountants in
I still don't understand how people think the 787 and a350 are competing. The a350 is much larger than the 787. 777 and the a350 can be seen as competitors.
@@quemiraelbobo 2 out of the 3 787 variants have less pax capacity than the 350 (only talking -900 here). despite the 787-10 has more pax capacity its mtow is 30lower than the 350. now, if we're talking -800 variant, okay, i can see that, but 2 of the 3 a350 base variants are much more similar in capacity to the 777 than the 787...
