A few English commentators saying England would've won easily if they had a full team on the field, which is pretty ridiculous iyam... Who's to say Portia Woodman wouldn't have scored 5 tries on her own if they hadn't taken her out... She's fully capable of doing that.
@@actiaint under pressure the Roses were beaten, in the last play, the Roses played to their strength and were outplayed , one on one, under the final pressure .
Fact is England would have had this won by half time easily, they were running away with it after just 15 minutes and not one NZ fan is brave or respectful enough to admit that. Once the sending off happened the only way NZ could win was having more players on the pitch. FACT.
You're delusional. Wayne Smith is a genius and the all blacks have a very strong ending. England should play more dynamic rugby pushing the train mauls can always be disrupted.
@@jothamkut2023 you are delusional. They were playing dynamic rugby until the sending off. Typical NZ whenever an opponent finds ways of scoring tries NZ fans cannot accept it. England would have put 50 points on the scoreboard like they did twice against NZ this year if the sending off had not happened. It was one way traffic until then. NZ fans need to man up to the truth.
@@Me-ll4ig How ignorant can you be lmfao. Last year England and France destroyed the black ferns because they hadn't played rugby for 2 years and had a toxic coaching envionment. Wayne Smith came on board and picked young players on form as well as changed the style that they played. The match is done and dusted, why do you have to be so fucking salty. Would've England won if she didn't get sent off? Maybe. But that's not what happened. Why don't you sit in bed and create an alternate timeline in your head so you can feed your delusions buddy. Move on.
