Why disassemble the entire blaster to swap out main springs when you can just break up the front and back shell? The spring swap is basically the same as the Harrier.
I've an upgraded unicorn... While I like the seagull's looks, I already have it's bigger brother the Harrier. The small form factor of the Unicorn is key for me. It's so easy to just take out the stock and throw it into a backpack which makes it easy to transport and low profile. This is an important factor in karen heavy Singapore where anything that looks remotely like a firearm attracts unwanted attention in the subways and by rubbernecks.
I feel like the unicorn is a better blaster for cqb, but the Seagull is a better blaster for a wider range of uses. I’ve got the white version preordered and I can’t wait to paint it up and use it as my competitive springer primary
You didn't need to open it at the center when you were changing the springs lol. There's a video review out there that's in Chinese that shows that you don't have to go that far to change springs.
Got one pre-ordered, might buy another one depending on how I feel this one. I'd want two eventually. It's probably gonna be the last springer I buy for a while. Trion and this would be my rotating blasters depending on what I feel.
The durability issue with 3d printed blasters is... sunlight. I had a very nice 3d printed blaster. I don't want to say who it was made by because my issue isn't with them, it's with 3d printed stuff in general. Being in direct sunlight warped it and it was rendered completely useless.
Is the spring easier to change without the catch spring jumping into another dimension, if you split the receiver from the barrel first? I imagine you wouldn't encounter the catch spring that way, since it would be captive in the receiver.
@@ConeyDawg I guess I’m a little confused because the Harrier had no such issues and the shell looks identical? Is the catch a different design from the harrier? Thanks in advance for the help!
Nah you don't crack it open the way they did. You just separate the front and back from the middle and it comes out. There's a review that's been out for weeks in Chinese that shows how to do it. Dr. Flux just went the college try way instead cause he probably didn't look at any instructions on how to do it properly.
Random idea I had: what if someone made a 3d printed full-length dart lmg? I’d love to see something like an RPK or M249 SAW. I feel like belt-fed/ light machine guns are very uncommon in the hobby and they should be more common
I will reserve my opinions for when i get mine, but it's the most expensive small springer blaster. This has to compete with the unicorn and the trion, which have a much lower pricepoint. Can't wait to see some comparison reviews, which are quite absent these days....
Note I don’t own any of the 2 blasters but I believe that the seagull is basically a Harrier mini. The only diff I can think of between the 2 is that the trigger pull for the unicorn felt heavier than the Harrier. If you have any specific details you want to ask go ahead.
I want to go back to when an awesome high powered blaster only cost $50.we shouldn't be paying so much for toys. The thing that sold me most on nerf was the cost a how readily available they were. Now not so much. It's becoming increasingly expensive and I'm seeing blasters that only certain people can obtain. For me this is a major turn off to nerf. The reality is if you want to stay in this hobby. Start reaching deep into those pockets.
There are more $80+ blasters now than people in the hobby. They almost all look the same. Either milsim or copies in different sizes of the same blaster. Yay.
