Such a humble n down to earth young lady waiting for dis moment all her life. Keep training hard same way Akeera, ave been watching from ur Excelsior days. Keep our flag flying high my frend 🙏🙏❤❤🥰🥰🥰🇯🇲🇯🇲🇯🇲💯💯💯
@@aliciamcdonald7105 They do something when it’s the USA Trials. Love Gabby but she ran 21.6 two times on that track and never replicates that time anywhere else. Her fastest time on any other track is 21.8 that’s just too far.
She was winning before she went to American at the international level , she is just an exceptional talent paired with resources . Don't get ahead of reality now lol.
12.28 by Nugent was WL for a few hours until surpassed by M Russell of USA. Not embellished. Correction: the WL held by Nugent lasted less than an hour.
@@danieltan2270 announcers never said world lead because it never was. The world lead was set about an hour earlier. At 4pm Jamaica time. This race was run at 6:15
@@dantej32 I think you should go for a ear check. There were a few announcers. The first mentioned national record but another later indicated world leading before video ended. You must be deaf. Go google article by World Athletics on this event too. Stubborn.
@@dantej32 Did you account for time difference between Jamaica and Oregon, USA? And did you try to insert a lie? 4 pm? Not 5 pm US time? Let me make it clear so you wont be able to sneak your way out of this. Oregon USA is two hours behind Jamaica. The Jamaican 100 m hurdles was scheduled at 6.12 pm Jamaican time which is 4.12 pm in Oregon, USA while the USA 100 m hurdles was held shortly later at 5pm Oregon time which is 7 pm in Jamaica. This means Jamaican ran their 100 m hurdles race first before the USA ran theirs. So Nugent set a WL but the WL was short lived as it was broken less than an hour later by M. Russell in Oregon USA. By the way, are you a serial lier? Or you are partially deaf? Go get your ears check. Towards the end of the video, one of the host mentioned World Leading. If announcer never mentioned WL, where the hell did you complain about embellishment then?