World of Tanks || GOLD STANDARD 

you need to drive in and out of that bush

WOT got rid of the Bushes for the TD"S in most of the maps

@@lawrencemagda3357 One of the lead map designers probably got divorced.

Bushes??? Play on xbox and you see what's good for you... almost none compared with pc 😠. I started recently on pc but its so frustrating because all the time i wasted on xbox all my tanks, crews for nothing. Its bull that we can't transfer or merge accounts.

@@sam7mann that was a year ago. I too play xbox, I enjoy console play over PC.

.. the whole "MM is broken" thing is a bloody lie.. I'm a developer it would take me about 90 minutes to write a great MM from scratch.. they can't,fix MM it isn't BROKEN it is working as intended! WG want as many tier ten tanks.. (which need gold to run.. so are the paying customer base...) hitting [Battle] as possible... and too many tier ten players simply play for the chance to bully littlies for stats.. tier ten can NEVER get minus matchmaking.. WG want tier 8's (premiums or otherwise) grit in the mill: to be food for the tier tens... and get those " tight miserable premium T8 playing buggers" to play their tier tens as many cycles as possible and a) either pay cash into the game or b) prop up the food stock or the feeding of T10's creating more 3,5,7 battles... because the free players are simply there to be a) meat and b) leant on to encourage them to grind up as fast as possible and become T10 fee earners... WG want you to Select [T10] click [Battle] .. hoping for a 3,5,7 roflstomp... All the 3,5,7 MM really does is deal easy meat as often as possible to the 3 paying customers at tier ten.. to boost their stats deliberately.. then they lie and say it's a software issue.. that way tier ten tankers hit [Battle] hoping for a 3,5,7 and when they get a "30vs30 / 15vs15 all tier ten" they don't complain that they then spam gold, create cash for WG, cos it's not every game that they spam gold.. and they get a chance every [Battle] click of free meat to stat boost on /do missions against... it's a gamblers psychology tool to keep u at the table.. always has been

Oh. I just realized this is your F2P account vid. Just 9 kills?? Slacker! LOL!

If you think that this is honest humidity than i am feeling sorry for your lacking judgement of character

What, Just a normal E75 driver when top tier

I mean, he was _Lenin_ I think it's kinda appropriate

@@wojtek4p4 yea, good enough

Maybe he meant soles? Might have a shoe fetish?

maybe a demon or luzifer ?

he is showcasing a free2play account on twitch.. go check out bud

Yeah , once he found out how much harder it is to play I think he gave up - its just so rigged, see how many premium rounds he as loaded in this tank?

@@bluewinds10 He is still playing with his f2p acc. On twitch

@@Jonas-ij4td called on his bullshit

@@bluewinds10 He did some 5k dmg before using his premium rounds and still had over a third of the standard rounds he started out with. You're almost never going to run out of standard rounds on the Standard B, so might as well load a bunch of premium just in case. Doesn't mean you have to use the premium rounds (and he didn't until facing a heavy in a tense situation)

*Who are you?*

Good choice :)

AMX 13 105 on console lol

I thanked the T-10 for and epic game.

Auto reloading and auto loaders are different. Auto-reloading is takign shell after shell after shell. As to where Auto loaders have a drum or a clip.

On need it on hull to get concealment bonus

@@eddoras169 Oh shit.. really? Looks like I've wasted some free camos then.. I must be Wargaming's dream because my OCD doesn't like camo on the hull but not the turret and the gun.

Kompoism yes it’s kind of unnatural but if you’ve got a lot of tanks the camo goes a lot further. Anyway you can demount it and move it if you want.

@@eddoras169 Good point, will have to demount some every time I play one of those tanks lol

If you've made that many attempts and have not received a direct answer, then most people would figure out that your request is denied. FFS stop asking.

M. Redleg 20 is not 'many', 2000 is

TheNuklearSlug i do have an opinion of my own, but why does everything need a reason

@@DrWYD Entirely subjective. Twenty requests for a specific video of an opinion about a stupid fake pixel tank is 19 too many.

I hope you read this, this might help clear up some things: WoT is an ecosystem, meaning you cant 'just' buff a tank. If you buff/nerf a tank, a lot of other tanks will be nerfed and buffed. Just look at the when they introduced the obj268v4: It demolihsed same tier heavies and lower tier tanks, essentially nerfing almost every heavy at tier 10. Or when they changed the arty: Previously it could hit hard but had bad accuracy, meaning it was a counter against camping TD and Slow heavies. Now: counters agressive players and lighter tanks, because you aim faster and you can maybe pen them. So, I think you agree that the IS4 strenght never was the fact that it is good against same tier heavies. It had good matchups against -2 tanks, and against -1/0 mediums. And because of still insane 340 HEAT pen, it had a good matchups as a support heavy; yolo-ing HEAT rounds into Maus and co. So, if you are comparing the IS4 to the WZ111-5A or the E100, you are doing it wrong. You should compare it to the T110E4, and the PzVII. And voila, the stats are similar. Those two tanks are insane bullies when top tier, and are meh when in a tier X only. (not all tier 10 tanks get much better in -2, see the leo1, k91 or the strv103b for example) So if you buff the things that hold the IS-4 back from domination in tier 8 (DPM or speed) you just killed of tier 8-9 heavies and meds. If you buff the IS4 to fit in to tier 10 (alpha and armor) then you created a regural boring tier 10 soviet heavy, and noone needs a third IS7. Also, Wargaming thinks in line progression, so if you played a pershing, then a M46, it is only logical for the M48 to have a similar playstyle. But, I think you agree, the ST-1 is good at it is, and the KV-4 is fun as well. If you change the IS4 in any significant way, WG needs to change this as well, to fit in the line. All in all, you cant 'just' buff a tank; even if it underperforms. The IS4 has an awful winrate globally because noone plays it, because it gets tier 10-only battles a lot. So essentially, to buff the IS4, the tank needs almost no change, but the matchmatking needs. If you are in -2 and -1 more often, you can use the IS4's strenghts more often. I hope you read it and i could show you some points as why its not the IS4 that needs the buffs.

Good question

...also, if the nose & fuse of the round fired does not hit the target, but the side or shoulder of the it does, it will be more likely bounce, no matter the shell type; assuming it (the shell) is not above the 3 calibres rule - and even then because the fuze isn't triggered it can default to a highly flat shallow angle glancing bounce - at least thats how I view those rare flukey times that for an example, an ELC can bouncing a KV-2's 152mm HEAT of a corner/butt-welded joint on its armour; along with the terrain's sloping coumpounding the angles of the vehicle, with the suspenion movement direction at the time of impact etc blah blah..