world's best ai vs geoguessr pro 

I mean if the AI needed more time to upload and make the inference then yes it would work, but yeah not in the "pressure" way lol

Thats how we used to beat the cheating extension people used to use a couple years back. It could see the data behind the pic and 5k it but it needed like 20 seconds, so if u guess within the first 15 it just didnt guess lol

Is just limiting the ai processing time.

@@gabrielamaral978 18 sec ago

That could be a way. Large AI models are pretty slow and need time. Just look at how long Bing sometimes takes to answer and they have a lot more power than some students I would guess.

It was a 2 month long project. Rainbolt took years.

​@@3446 That 2 month long project relies on the progress made by thousands of super smart scientists in the field of AI spending their lifetimes in research over the last century.

Not even a comparison. Gary chess way more impressive.

​@@joshwhitley8969 Huh? No, a chess computer is extremely simple by comparson. It's literally just analysing every single possibility, even the really stupid moves. Chess has very few rules, and a single clear objective, and can easily be reduced to a few simple instructions. It's a very easy thing for a machine to be good at: Just brute-forcing all the possibilities and possible responses to responses to responses, down to a given depth.

​@@ashscott6068no just no Until today no one has built a bot that knows every position in chess There is more position than atoms in earth you couldn't multiply it because the knight moves different the bishop does different pawn does different rook does different The highest bot today in chess in stockfish 16 the newest realease just beating stockfish 15

fr 😍😍

Mf this is so funny😂

😂

tom holland from ohio

The tom holland-lookin guy has such a look, I love it. He looks like someone straight out of a movie.

they don't

​​@@regd6060they do honestly

@@regd6060 they do

Thats crazy fr

@@regd6060 they do

It has found its own obscure meta and Trevor wants it to share the meta :)

😂😂

😂😂

Avdol

​@@normal5389 was waiting for this lol

meta players smh /s

Definitely gonna be getting a a bunch of new dirt on camera metas

The ai actually just scanning the place thats it 💀

You could just train an AI by making it play a billion times and do basic image recognition. You don't even need an AI for that, just save every image you see and map each of them to a set of coordinates.

​@@Jonassoe and when new coverage comes out you're fucked

At this point in time, he has probably seen more ;)

@@Nova0Rock AIs can play more games of chess against itself than a grandmaster can play against any oponent, really, during a lifetime. I don't think so, if this AI can be trained using images, it will use basically every image available.

@@Nova0Rock He has been using geoguesser longer but an AI has basically no concept of time the way we do, they could train so much more in a couple minutes than we ever could in years. They said they showed the AI 250,000 images to train. There's no way rainbolt has seen over 250,000

He has actually beaten AI before.

The game was rigged against the AI there lmao

It should work on custom images. So you can find out what regions it only guesses on meta va what it knows. Their has to be 1 region that is pure meta

@Some Guy I’m not referring to actual image metadata, I mean meta info from a geoguessr sense. Referring to small hints in images such as an antenna showing up in a certain country or a rift in the sky due to improper image stitching in another

@Some Guy yup it’s pretty terrifying. I’m trying to keep my skills honed enough to where I can keep up when AI pair programming is industry standard, but it’s gonna get messy. I’m 25 so it’s not like I can hope to be retired before the real changes hit lol

I mean that's what he showed in the end of the video

Yeah would love to give it a photo I take from out on the street and see how accurate it is - I imagine it would be, but interesting to see what might start slipping it up

That’s what I was thinking. Pigeon is the stock fish of geoguesser

This is actually crazy. It’s scary if malicious people get this tech to track people.

Ohh wow! I never thought of that😮

I suppose it's a bit different, because every round in geoguessr has a 100% correct answer, whereas in chess, the best moves are calculated by the engine. It would be comparable if you wouldn't get the solution to a round in geoguessr and had to verify your guess manually

@@gingeral253 Shit you got a point, this might seems actualy malicious tool hidden behind harmless fun.

now he knows the feeling of being a mortal like us lmao

​@@njbrx woooooooooooooah

for real lmao, especially during the cambodia game

@@soyanshumohapatra no u

@@KianTheeGreat what?

Not really. It average 44km which is way too much to pinpoint someone. Maybe if it gets to under 3km

@@Skyl3t0n that's better than not knowing the general area to search in

@@Skyl3t0n getting within 44km of osama bin laden would have been very helpful

@@Skyl3t0n And it's also only using 4 images each guess with a very strict time limit to process them

Like seriously the application of this outside of just geoguessr is just massive

Yo

and how much better did this guy get ;D

Main advantage probably has very little to do with the AI and more what they were talking about with sort of pretraining it by feeding it politically/geographically relevant cells that they picked out manually

2 am moment

​@@georainbolt as you always say, "cope" 😂

🤓

also the sign that says "20m" is only in belgium

The stupid kids don’t realize that they’re building technology for the current billionaires of the world who are use this technology to suppress the rest of society for the rest of human existence I mean, how dumb are these kids? They’ve created some thing that allows the police to track somebody from a simple photo I mean do they really think they’re helping society because the only ones they’re helping are the 0.01% that’s the only ones that they are helping I mean read the Bible this is demonic technology here this is the type of stuff the devil wants for complete global control .

"trust your gut"

@@miniepicness thanks i already forgot what it was

@@ahhkaraj You should've trusted your gut

True, but I think tech companies are all over a lot of post-grad/PhD Stanford students lmao

@@jjpswfc yeah just graduating from Stanford with a bachelors would get a ton of job offers, much less being a graduate/PhD student

they don't even know how is it working

@@richhobo1216 mhm I said post-grad. No doubt that undergrads would get a lot of offers though. Particularly with the state the comp sci industry is in rn, most people's dog could get a job somewhere if it promises to learn about machine learning.

@@zigotina I feel like you have to know how it's working to make it... The only way they might not know how it's working is that they don't know exactly what it looks for and exactly what "weighting" it puts on the nodes i.e. how important are telephone poles compared to how important grass colour is.

It's also kind of sad that one of the best humans stands no chance against the AI. A year ago he would win easily, now he's barely winning in Laos. This is just the beginning.

@@Ruzzky_Bly4t Why would it be sad? It's just the natural advancement of technology. They are programmed to be better at handling specific tasks than human beings and yet without human beings, AIs are dumb as fuck.

We can compare this like Gary Kasparov and Blueray Supercomputer chess match

@@Ruzzky_Bly4t How is it sad? If anything, it's mighty impressive that a single human can be talented enough to almost stand shoulder to shoulder against an AI which is built using the collective knowledge provided by lifetime's worth of research by thousands of scientists who are most likely geniuses themselves!

Rainbold😮‍💨

thanks bro

Lmao my thought exactly

nah thats just how germans look

Bro don't do people on the spectrum that dirty😢

​@@OfficialCANVASlol

@@OfficialCANVAS why are you assuming smart people are automatically autistic? that's a harmful stereotype

When it cut to the first shot of the two students leaning against the wooden wall, I legitimately said to myself, that one on the right is some bad CGI

literslly man... the one kid with the screen to himself looks completely like an animation

I don't expect they could adapt to that out of the box. Edit: spelling

Actually, on thinking about it, I think only blur would be an issue that would throw off the AI al the time. The others like half screen, no panning, and other things like upside down and mirrored and even black and white or scrambled could probably work out of the box, since the AI picks up on small things and I don't think it's bothered by where in the picture that detail is too much, or what colour.

Blur/half screen might work because the model wasn't trained on that. Panning wouldn't change much, it would just take 1 screenshot instead of 4. 'Super low time' doesn't really change anything because the AI takes a screenshot which is fed to the model. But even with blur/half screen it's just a matter of training the model on such images, which the creators can do very easily because they already have the image dataset that they can apply blur to or anything they want.

@@waltkowalsky4344 I think you're underestimating the impact that 4 pics vs 1 has. you saw in the video how much worse it did with 3 pics instead of 4 in the glitched round rainbolt almost won

@@rydenkaye9735 Well it wasn't just 3 pictures, it was 3 pictures plus an incorrect one. There is a saying that the only thing worse than no information is misinformation.

That's what I was thinking too, it can win at geoguesser but it may depend on these meta informations instead of the actual location

Its pretty much what happened to chess, we're now at the tipping point where AIs are starting to beat the best geo players, and eventually they'll be good enough to discover new metas that allow people to guess more accurately than they ever could now.

@@seventeen777 What lol chess engines first beat the world champion in 1997... A chess engine ran on my toaster would 10-0 Magnus Carlson with ease. Engines are no longer a competition they're the answer to what you should've done.

@Asdasdasa exactly what I said. I was using chess as an example of how geo ai will likely play out in the next couple decades, since so far it has followed the exact same path as chess

@@seventeen777 Sorry thought you meant that the tipping point was in chess and not geo

Yeah, this will happen with literally everything. Human supremacy is coming to an end, we’re being replaced in every aspect aside from manual labor

Nah just 1. The AI is cracked and need the nerf

I'd call it a side effect. The AI doesn't "know" what it's doing

IN Albania :D

I don't know much about neural networks either, but from what I've understood overfitting and therefore making a model remember a dataset too well is definitely a thing.

It also has a future for stalking purposes.

​@@Ruzzky_Bly4t probably not for public use if I was to guess bro

​@@Ruzzky_Bly4t i mean u can get the person's location from exif data, u don't even need AI i.e. recognition to get someone's location off his pics

@@casualfool122once they publish the paper it wouldnt take much to read it and re-implement it yourself if you have decent CS knowledge and had a good GPU. Once one person does that itll be readily available.

@@Pharoah2 maybe, but the chances of it spreading enough to where its readily available for stalkers wouldn't be extremely rapid by any means. and that's only if it actually gets spread at all

It’s funny till it hits ur workplace

ikr, I was waiting for the dude with the glasses and piled up hair to steeple his fingers and say "soon the world will be mine, bwahahahaha!"

why is their skin so perfect too

i hate them so much

ai filter@@buildintotrains

Glasses and the sweatshirt

Artificially of course.

Could still be doable with a team of humans so you get a little hedging going.

@@Gameboygenius just give up theyve replaced us 🤖🦾

@@Gameboygenius Give the AI another 2 years, and it will probably destroy 10 pro players at once.

@Some Guy actually, the military's technology isn't any better. mostly because developing AI like this costs a lot, takes a lot of time and has limited military uses. China has the facial recognition stuff, that's probably the closest equivalent after all, scientists figured out HOW to make an atom bomb years before they found the real method

well it has been the case for a few years now already (cf Deep Blue for example)

It does, Rainbolt even mentioned it at the very end of the video

Saying that today for this kind of test shows how long this technology came. No one would believe it possible a couple decades ago.

i bet it’s trash at india dusky

@@georainbolt fr bro ain't ready for that smoke on India.