SYSTEMS ARCHIVE HERE: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/... 5 More Videos Every week on Patreon!! bit.ly/3ubx7CW Book a session with us here! bit.ly/3oDTZtH ==CONNECT WITH US=== Alex's Instagram: / cegalexk
Very interesting system, and as you walk away when you are 100 pieces in profit you actually win surprisingly often. I checked your system against a database of 39402 spins from Casino Wiesbaden. One round ends when you are either 100 or more pieces in profit or can´t bet because progression killed you. There were 1150 rounds won and 698 rounds lost. The problem is, the average amount won are 122.16 pieces, while the average amount lost is 362.61 pieces. If you play this system once, your chance of walking away with 100 or more pieces of profit is 62.22% Sorry, calculated on a single zero table, there are no double zero tables in Europe
With a system like this that makes every bet possible (all dozens or all columns or both splits), there needs to be a point where you stop returning to 1 and just keep any losers going until they come off then go start again. For this system I would say once you lose on 5 units, don't start at 1 for the winner again, just leave it open and repeat like this until you hit everything else. There will be some blanks, but you'll be able to get out of the cycle of having 2 or 3 huge bets at a time
Fibonacci works, your using it wrong with 6 bets. Wait till a column or dozen hasn't hit 4 times before putting it in action. One bank, 2 people, one monitors columns, the other monitors dozens. The system is a process of waiting & patience. It works when using it correctly. I perfer clocking the dealer, those with the same wheel speed & ball speed, this is something not taught in schools today, to adjust speed of both every spin. Fibonacci is the next best method of play there is.
Great system. I could have used the Fibonacci Sequence the time I played BlackJack at $10 and lost 10 hands in a ROW doing Martingale. Loss $10K+ in 5 minutes. Now with the Fibonacci method - I could have played 13 hands and lost only $10K. I work it into my next Craps game. Thanks everyone.
In math class i had Fibbinoci progression is 1, 1, 2, 3,5,8....and so forth, so you just add the previous 2 numbers to get the 3rd number, I have tried fibinanoci (excuse the mispelling i think i mispelled fibinacci) in the past but on just a single dizen and went like 10 spins without a hit so your going to have enough chips to last 10 to 11 no spins to get a hit, otherwise clench the butt cheeks.
Like any Martingale, this Fibonacci system needs a stop loss. When I play martingale gb, I don't go past 6 spins or 32 units. I stop loss at 32 units and go back to 1 unit. With Fibonacci I stop loss at 34 units and go back to 1 unit. If you chase too far you can't recover your loss. I play this and martindale gb by my self.
I use something similar to a fibinacci bet on a single dozen. I use a stop loss after 6 bets so you don't chase so far you can't recover. I re did the math from you video of mini martingale to come up with it. I will submit it. Also have another one where you do this with the martingale lover on all the 2-1 spaces so your pay outs are higher than the martindale lover.
WOW. I got a comment; so had to I watched this video again. I said that I should try thing idea: I won $300 on a Craps table last week using your Fibonacci system. The table was almost Cold, but, something was there. I remembered your idea: The Masindgale
Who would’ve guessed, not the guy who owns a dealers school and a guy who works there. It’s almost as if they were talking about a player system that does better and benefits from double or triple zero roulette system but I guess my basic understanding of the English language is so subpar that I couldn’t pick up on it.
@@cutweldngrind aww man. I saw it at Venetian and felt only a sucker would play it. Then I lost $1,700 on a double zero machine that night at Venetian. Then on my next trip to Bellagio I won back pretty much all of that. I learned I should have cut my losses and walk at Venetian. It is so hard to do.
Actually you aren´t as lucky to hit the greens before they go higher, as, contrary to Martingale, your winnings increase with every progression, you win 0 when you bet 1, 3 in round 2, then 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 15, 23, 36, 57.... Actually in this system you want to hit immediately before going broke :-)
Seems really bad imo. If you're gonna do this then you would skip betting on the first spin since you literally can't win on that spin, you can only push or lose.
You did it wrong. You're only supposed to go down 2 steps when you win, not back to the base unit - either the person that submitted the system or the way y'all did it, is not following Fibonacci correctly. For instance when you win at 5 units, you're supposed to go back down to 2 units, then if you win that, you go back to 1. If you go up to 8 units, you win there, you go down to 3 units, not back to 1.
So, the problem is that you are trying to run 6 different bets at the same time. The Fibonacci sequence is a good progression, but if you can't count cards, then you should never play more than 2 bets at the same time.
What does card counting have to do with roulette? Its the ability to track the bets in your head. Most people can keep track of 2 different bets at the same time, but more than that and the money management process goes right out the window. If you wanted to give this a fair shot, just do it with 2 bets, not 6.
That's the problem with every system. It works right up to the point where it doesn't work anymore. With every system you will eventually encounter a losing streak, sooner or later...
Why even bother with the first bet because you can only lose. Any number will push except 0 which is a total wipe out.... Play from the last number and bet one unit on the the losses. and leave the winning number blank.
I feel so dumb, I’ve been playing this system wrong LOL, I thought 1-2-3-5-8-13-21-34 is the NUMBERS you need to put on the roulette and you just add a number if you lost or remove a number if you won hahaha!!! Tbh I did make money with this way, but oh my…. can’t believe I was so off LOL
