World's smartest person wrote this one mysterious book 

"Each and every time that a human speaks, their thoughts are simultaneously BROADCAST in a much richer way than can be fit into words." No belief included, I simply remember before being taught verbal language. (mom later said that I was not a year old) Our languages serve NO greater purpose than to enable dishonesty. The lies go back much farther than anyone realizes.

TTTTTAF

Well… that’s a need of our society because humans are acting on a global scale now. We solved the needs of connectivity but same time we lost our connection 🎉

Read the Quran

Toby, I'm always skeptical of these so-called geniuses that are supposedly brilliant but don't want to interact with other people. We've all known them. They have a reputation for always knowing the answer to an instructor's question, but they don't want to sit down with you over coffee, and explain that answer. Actually, they often adopt a cynical and superior attitude over you because you need an explanation. Social skills, like making and keeping friends, requires one set of intellectual skills. Renowned mathematician Steven Strogatz outlined and organized these skills with humor and a degree of mathematical rigor in his 2009 book, The Calculus of Friendship. On the other hand, solving difficult problems in science requires another set of mental skills, as anyone watching your videos must know. While scientists and other professional problem solvers might assign the latter of these skill sets of greater importance, they won't get very far in teaching research or creating new technologies if they can't work with their colleagues. Perhaps playing "the savant" may have served as a well accepted archetype for a scientist in the 19th century, we now live in an age of teamwork and have built an infrastructure around communication. The Internet was originally developed as the DARPANET for academics and engineers to more easily exchange messages using electronic mail, transfer files automatically with UUCP, and inform colleagues of the latest scientific and technical developments, or recruit expertise for solving particular problems via News. Anyway, that was then. Personally I believe the scientific savant of old was a poor excuse for someone unwilling to be outgoing, friendly, and generous. Einstein knew that and was known to be quite charming at Princeton. Anyone who obfuscates purposely and cannot communicate their ideas in various ways for clarity isn't a genius, but has a disability.

I did the test in 1/5 of the time allowed, my IQ was measured to be 70. So My IQ is 350.

@@u.v.s.5583 don't answer any questions and submit in 0 time... your result will tend to infinity 😁

@@KristopherNoronha That settles it. The smartest person in the world - is you. :)

IQ testing cannot be defined by the time it takes to answer the test. An extra 20 points could be permitted, but twice as much? I doubt it!

@@faustus09 I suspect that Asimov was joking.

Some Hyper Intelligent individuals see the Hypocrisy in the world and discover how much control world leaders have over what is allowed to be known by the masses and just choose not to engage in Paradigms that society calls Success. Look what happened to Tesla. Look what happened to Sidis. Would you want to offer your knowledge to people that ridicule you or use your knowledge for destructive purposes?

Correct, he sort of bugged out......

I fully agree, there are a lot or Einsteins living in solitude across this world im sure of it. They only decide not to show themselves cause the mystery of the universes plain existence is more than enough to entertain them till the day they pass

❤

Did you research his father? I wonder if his knowledge of hypnosis and psychology played a role

I’m sorry for your loss, sir. Thank you for contributing to the world! Do you still research?

hi Josef! I loved that book! I used it as one of my research books and remember getting lost in it I enjoyed it so much. Congrats!

I still research. My last six technical papers are in video tech and color science. My next one will also be color science.@@sarahbailey6723

Thanks for reading the book. No congrats necessary, I got to touch all the extant copies of William's writings. That's a good month!@@narojnayr

Such decision is a function of personality, not intelligence. Intelligence is a factor shaping one's personality, but there are a lot of other factors. William Sidis was a recluse and it was to his own detriment. What I want to say is, don't think that there are no smart people leading a very public life, because it isn't true. Moreover, being a hermit is not a smart decision.

We should find the hermits and ask them to do an IQ test

*Ted Kaczynski enters the ring*

@@Rctdcttecededtef Pretty sure he hated that the press followed him around...Leave the hermits to alone

Google Chris Langan

Thanks~

Thank you

Is there an ending of life that is not sad though?

I want to know more about Amy Wallace.

@@julius43461 Greta Thunberg

Because one is never done learning 😌

that's nice, but not really

I thought I was wrong, but I may have been mistaken.

@@MichaelGroenendijk yes..and also if one were to theoretically think up new knowledge or a revolutionary idea, you would naturally question the reason it doesn't exist with how much information is available in the modern world

sounds nice but is not true... humility is not a sign of anything except uncertainty, not "genius". If someone is certain of something that always comes across as NOT humble. Humility was elevated to a virtue with christianity, before it was just a desirable thing (perhaps), or a trait in a person's character.

It's good for when I can't sleep 😴

She likes big iQ’s 😉

😅

This

She’s using a bad microphone or has the settings wrong. That’s what’s causing the audio to sound like it does.

@@duggydo The audio settings are clear and enjoyable as they are, imo.

Thought you were about to say Lewis Carroll was one of his pseudonyms lmao

Lewis Carroll's third novel - Sylvie and Bruno - contains a chapter where Albert Einstein's 'elevator' thought experiment is featured as a joke. Carroll was onto the major feature of General Relativity, but missed the point entirely.

More interesting side notes: Lewis Carrol was a mason, and his books are packed with symbolism.

And of course Lewis Carroll wasn't his real name.

And he was a paedophile.

It's called video editing ... 😂😂✂🎬🎥

same

Ditto

My whole being says this is true.

I thought so too!

Yup

I find it funny everybody still thinks they know what time is

@@TylerBaham I know what it is, it's relative and also a construct, which makes it a robo-aunt or something ina similar vein.

​@@TylerBaham It's clearly time to rock you nerd.

I think he preferred it that way. He carried a box of papers that he wrote, and some written by others, particularly an Indian mathematician. Most of that box survived.

@@JosefMarcis there any place where I can read those books or find more about what they were about?

Except the black holes are not the inverse of the 2nd laws of thermodynamics. He got the answer right with the wrong maths hehe (who never)

It seems to me he was very close to realising the true nature of our universe, composed of the ether in which points of potential energy manifest as matter. His published work was soon after the established view that the ether does not exist, as proven by the famous Michelson-Morley experiment. This is now largely regarded as nonsense, predicated as it was on the assumption that the ether is some sort of fluid. We now have the quantum field, but it really isn't the same thing. It's all too late anyway. We're stuck with the train wreck that is the Standard Model. For all we know, Sidis may have presented countless papers for publication which were rejected.

Yes..I met him Late 1960s.. He was visiting Ohio State .Professor next door had him Visit..

He was just far ahead of the times. synergetics is maverick science.

Bucky wasn't a child prodigy, he was the real deal. Don'tr compare him to this hack.

I used to walk under a Buckminster Geodesic Trispan everyday on the way to classes at Drexel. Not sure if it's even still there since that was 40 years ago.

I have this book, but have held onto it for nearly 10 years. Perhaps it’s time.

@Don't Read My Profile Photo dw i don’t plan on it

There is the presumption with IQ that it should be manifest, but always in very cultural/situational, specific ways (if you become a titan of industry, you're a genius. If you think the whole game isn't worth playing, well...). Dad (he had a background in psychology as well as other things) stated most IQ tests are little more than display that you can think like the author, with various framing gimmicks that once you recognize them, play more like a game than a measure of IQ. He could score near perfect on the Stanford-Binet IQ test, but as he described it, "I'm nothing but a dumb country boy".

@Don't Read My Profile Photo Ok I will not.

It is not that such measurements are even dubious. Psychometric tests were never designed to measure high intelligence because by definition, it is extremely difficult to obtain a statistically significant sample of such individuals (which in itself is a very subjective procedure) in order to design a test and grade individuals accordingly. As for the scores given to people in early 1900s, I don't know for sure in each instance, but in cases of highly precocious children, they used to get scores based on interpolation taking age into account, and that often resulted in astronomical figures. Another recent example of this is Marilyn Vos Savant.

Hawking might not have recognised as a child when he was taking an intelligence test, especially if it was presented as a game, such as Raven's Matrices. I'm a few years younger than he was, and a group IQ test was one of the formalities before selection at primary school for a secondary school placement at 12, the Scottish equivalent of the English "Eleven-Plus." I don't know if his county in England did that. We kids in Scotland were not told our IQ score.

I find it perhaps all the more remarkable for the prevalence of socially-maladjusted former 'prodigies' that the likes of Demis Hassabis (DeepMind) and Magnus Carlsen (FIDE champion) can appear so grounded, even relatable by comparison; Hassabis, in particular, is disarmingly affable, self-effacing and charismatic.

i think you left the word “voices” out 😭

@@forestvamp1684 lmao yes, this is just like "one of the video games of all time"

sometimes i click on tibees videos just to hear her voice.

I absolutely agree!

@@aboodyabdulqadir5487 one of the movies ever made

How richer his theories would have been.

@Benjamin David Lurie yeah, perfect for me 😂😂

If Sidis created Rick & Morty, or even Steven Universe, he would’ve made the current ones look like 2 year olds created it 🤭

@Benjamin David Lurie woosh.

Hes probably the real rick with a brain that big the show is his life story

I mean, that atlantis features in it at all is pretty solid evidence that his ideas did not actually have much value. If you can't distinguish an obvious rhetorical device from a myth with any possible basis in history, you have no business writing about history.

Yes! When Amy Wallace and I wrote The Prodigy, we had trouble figuring out how to position his languages, how and where he learned them, etc. We decided to intersperse them with his wanderings across the USA, because that's how and where he could have heard the Tribes' languages. [He lived before the Tribes' languages were audibly recorded.]

@@iusethisnameformygoogleacc1013 Not history mate, but anthropology. But maybe you'd better read it first...

​@@iusethisnameformygoogleacc1013 Thats possible. Also possible that you havent read it and have no idea what he said about it, or what sense he used it in, and are being dismissive based on thirdhand claims in youtube comments.

Wampum belts! Good catch!

i imagine what the gentlemen was after was actually (lowest common denominator), intentful effect. This is the metaphysical construct separating living things from non. I am impressed with this persons work being it so old, and having some intuition into somethings that weren't quite right, however definitely in the right direction. as a training biochemist myself, i loved that Prof Doc Sean S. Carroll borrowed the quote, "the purpose of life is to hydrogenate carbon dioxide"! lol

One can equally say though that we "pay" for the simplicity of broken down foods and expended heat by the negentropic build up within living systems. This seems to be what Sidis was getting at. I'm not saying that he was right or wrong, but its eerie relevance to such topics as Black Holes, so-called "dark matter" and energy, and symmetry of laws, should be discernible to any thinking person.

@@helicalactual Check out John A. Gowan General Systems Theory.

This is why I have been saying we need to make machines out of flesh!!!

It's the trend towards ever increasing complexity and order in life that is suggested as the LOCAL reversal of entropy. And there is a lot we don't understand about how what even just the life we are familiar with metabolises energy. Quantum Processes are not subject to the second law, and there is much evidence for biological nuclear processes. In all manner of bacteria, plants, and our own cells. There is a Bacterium for example that you can put in a test tube, sealed with distilled water, and a microgram quantity of sulphur. Come back a few weeks later and the whole inside of the test tube will be coated in sulphur crystals. There was a press release from the LHC in 2013 that announced the analysis of the quark fluid hydrodynamics in the collisions had revealed that gravity was the result of a tension of wormholes connecting every subatomic particle in the universe to every other one. Perhaps as life develops well past where we are now, these subspace connections become reinforced to the point where a local area of the universe does pass through the event horizon and the arrow of time reverse. If information has mass, getting too smart, may well lead to disappearing up your own buttholes? 🤔🤭

Where did u listen to the audio book might I ask?

I was thinking wife, but teacher? Sure. That too.

exactly. the fact he basically outlined dark energy and dark matter through a priori reasoning is truly amazing

@@elijah6342 not amazing to me...pretty good, though.

@@wesstone7571 the question is whether it was Kant's synthetic a priori or traditional analytic a priori

@@elijah6342 Any equation you come up with, you can add a ‘negative gravity force’ that can balance out the equation - just because we call it ‘dark energy’ doesn’t mean anything - what’s the mechanics of it?

An intelligent person can believe anything that matches the data they've got, but a smart person will seek out Sufficient data using an adequate epistemology, not merely take what's in front of them. Anyone who accepts multiple universes is not very smart because if you think it through, any idea that is more complex than what it seeks to explain (multiple universes) is intellectually regressive.

yes, there have been quite a few parents who tried this, typically smarter than average parents, with varying degrees of success. Not all of them were excessively heavy handed.

Sidis was extremely intelligent. There were claims by famous MIT professor and MIT graduate who reported that he was “extremely intelligent” at least according to Wikipedia.

We inhale what plants exhale.

Are you really an MD

give me all your cars and trucks and be pulled apart in 11 dimensions you fool

Dark matter doesn't exist.

@@Dubsizzla I never said it was? I just thought it was a cool similarity with other hypotheses we have today, such as dark matter.

The "underside" of the space time fabric

Scientist know this since 2009. The year I was trying to solve sociological issues in Italy. So we are wait for Nobel money to rewrite the history of the known universe. (And money for new instruments). At the moment we need dark matter /dark capital. The universe seems to work like a CVT transmission of bubbles very similar to black holes. And is the same for national bankings around the world, and expanse economy regions. Sorry. I have to go fast. (I'm not forever)

@Seven Inches of Throbbing Pink Jesus Oh my god 😅😅😅 But I'm not a cat 😌

What's wrong with defining life via entropy?

@@marshallsamford3240 you probably could, however the entire idea of 'reserve energy stored in the brain' is pretty much archaic hogwash, along with the "only use 10% of the brain.' As for entropy reversal that's half true: organized systems, like life, do not utilize it as an additional energy source tho, through the process of organizing you reduce the local entropy while simultaneously increasing the global entropy by a larger amount (i.e. you 'expend' energy in order to do things). Additionally Shannon and Von Neumann expanded on the idea of entropy into the field of information theory and effectively showed that Laplace's demon would actually increase entropy globally as well, due to the processing of the information necessary to open and close the gate at the right times. This basically means the entire idea is fundamentally impossible. However there are real phenomena of random, and sometimes anti-entropic, motion that can be taken advantage of such as diffusion and brownian motion.

@@marshallsamford3240 Eh, they're related. But how intertwined are they?

@@ivoryas1696 Theres some tendency towards

@Angelspawn That seems about right. But, yeah; that means that defining life by reverse entropy requires more rigorous wording, or different words altogether.

Deutscheban Oh, wait. People are saying his genius wasn't anything? That's a shame.

@@ivoryas1696 yeah unfortunately some commentators were concentrating on "genius doesn't mean you'll be successful!" rather than the humanity of the poor guy :/.

Extreme pressure creates diamonds. He was one. And his theory will be proven correct. The vocabulary will be different but it's all there. Black holes, black matter, gravitational waves, multiverse.

We need to take away the idea that it is up to us as individuals us to take action when we see these social cripplings. Without making a spectacle, reach out and become a friend to someone who needs us. I try all the time and have had mixed results. I am blinded by my hope and take people into my home only to have damage done to my own well being when taken advantage of. I feel it is bc they don't know any other way. In any case, I won't give up bc those who are more in control of their impulses and self aware truly appreciate a place they can trust will serve everyone's best interest and allow the time to reflect and set a course. I continue to get so much insight to humanity and my purpose that regardless of the outcome ,we seem to grow from the experience. I am lucky to have met so many willing to share with her stories.

@@GCAT-zv9in Yeah, that seems about right. Helping individuals only helps so much... Still clearly worth your time though, so I'm not telling you to _stop._

There is nothing unintentional about this channel...

It is part of the entertainment my guy

why did you have to point it out

Yeah, gives me goosebumps. That mixed with her obvious intelligence and attractiveness makes her videos mesmerizing.

@@rgh622 not even the 2 sec foot shots in only 3 videos?

I thought she was tge smart one.

ahhhmm

Totally fell asleep to this!

It drove me up the wall, and I had to turn it off after 8 minutes.

this is the most low key way to tell her how attractive she sounds..LOL

Yes. The idea comes from Newtonian mechanics and Newtonian corpuscular light. Quite simply, using those theories, you need merely consider the case where some amount of mass, M, forms a sphere of radius R such that the Newtonian surface gravity leads to an escape velocity > c, the speed of light in vacuo. The idea was repeated, I believe independently, by either Laplace or Lagrange (I forget which) in 1798. Fred

He was the first. Unless you count an arabian mathematician who had a theory about why the sky was black at night - but that one doesn't have the vortex in it. WSJ figured out the vortex and why they must happen whether we can find them or not.

He wasn't... In fact, he might have been the last

@@santosl.harper4471 Do you know the first? There was also an Indian before Sidis but the Indian said his math was unreliable and needed more telescopy.

@@JosefMarc there were a few before Sidis. A very famous indian mathematician wrote proofs for the concept of a singularity, but did not theorise black holes! The pair that postulated the idea first came a century before anyone else

@@santosl.harper4471 What do you mean by "proofs for the concept of a singularity"? Proof =/ concept and no modern physicist believes that singularities actually physically exist. They probably don't exist. They are not actually there.

SOUGHT

Same. We smoked a blunt once on top of Mt. Fuji while talking about our favorite anime. Miss that man.

@@verlax8956this is true I was the blunt

time line is bout to change... it happend with tesla and django reinhardt ...

@c0ckhead684 I've know about this standard for millennia before you even mentioned it. Needed to preface my comment with that so you don't assume I'm some normal pleb.

Does William have a surname?

Success is very subjective.

Smart enough to know he didn't want to be a part of it!

@@kelseyoglesby9545 exactly! only the corrupt and/or fools can bear to remain in modern academia...

a vary flexible mind, for sure, excelling in rigid studies you might brake some ground, but being flexible in thought you have a much better chance.

I'd agree with this, except it's the internet therefore I'm required to post; "no! Yur dum!! hahahaha!"

It's because people don't understand Genius's , some of them just get mad, like me l have an lQ of 155 to 170 but people are not happy and they just don't want you to be heard about like they fell they should be ahead of you before your ahead of them , those are just silly people with nothing better to do how sad 🤭.😮.

1. A time-reversed star is nothing like a black hole. 2. John Michell in 1783 predicted black holes based on Newtonian gravitation. 3. Localised decreases in entropy happen all the time, in very far from equilibrium systems, they are called dissipative structures.

@@ozzymandius666Dumb little kid didn’t amount to anything. What a waste.

Are you trying to sound smart?

🙌

Fascinating connection

No

@@Himmelvakt I think Tolle was exaggerating it a bit to make a statement. It's true that there is more to intelligence than just IQ, such as EQ and social skills. I believe that general AI will soon be able to score 200+ IQ, and I think it was Ray Kurzweil who said that emotions are more difficult to simulate but AI will be able to generate convincing emotions he said.

I have met more intelligent people who lack common sense.

@@Anders01 How can you quantify something so complex like Intelligence in a 1 dimensional quantity

@@grimsobad8545 I think that's what Tolle was hinting at, that IQ test are merely "1-dimensional" logic. Probably AI will soon (if not already) be very good at solving IQ tests. EQ and other forms intelligence are probably more difficult for AI to simulate.

I like this spin.

If black holes speed up broken down matter to near S.O.L. THEN , the matter may, relative to our time, not yet reached the "singularity" if such a thing exists.

@@drunvert I think that if you take the nature of what a singularity would imply that it would take infinite time for anything to actually reach that theoretical point that is defined as the singularity and since we're pretty sure that black holes will evaporate over significantly less than infinite time until it reaches a critical limit of low mass induced instability and explode I agree that nothing ever actually reaches the point we define mathematically as a singularity regardless of how incredibly close it is able to approach an approximation of it that's measurably too small a difference as to be indistinguishable. At least as far as any current or near future prospective observational measurable data would be concerned

@@justdave9610 maybe an extreme case of time dilation? That's the only way I can think of for anything to reach infinite time

If you squint your eyes, maybe it looks like he is describing something in current astrophysics... but he isn't. None of what he said is at all in the slightest way related to any of the several dark matter theories, or to black holes. Life does not reverse entropy at a global scale. Like a refrigerator can reverse the entropy of material placed inside of it, but it is increasing the entropy of the environment outside of it. Life on Earth is sitting in the middle of the energy gradient between the sun and outer space, and uses some of that energy to make glucose and stuff.