World War 3 (Hour by Hour) 

Nice I'm gonna download it the game looks cool

Lol I have been playing for years

This is amazing breakdown 😂 truly is

Me like

@@bobjoebo8933 Lol what?!! 😲

im thanking that he is thanking the sponsor at the end of the video

"End with the world in ashes"-- THANKS AGAIN TO OUR SPONSORS

That was startling and sobering. "The world will end and we all die. So hey guys don't forget to to use your promo code, and choose YOUR country to simulate the end of civilization! See ya next time as we explore the history of Sierra Leone!"

“note’s”??? What does the apostrophe do?

@@Kaniela-xq8vl wrong comment

This comment alone made me redownload fallout shelter

@@9_1.1 nice

Lol

Vault dwellers, you mean, if you're thinking about more than one fallout game

Fallout 2 was absolutely one of the best games I've ever played. You can literally almost do anything you want.

What?

True, their cardboard helmets and inability to refuel their vehicles efficiently has shown to be disastrous. Drone warfare and the javelin supplied by the United States also has been crippling them hard. I don’t think Russia is really trying all that hard although even on a small scale people were expecting Ukraine to be squashed. We since then have been able to reverse engineer some of their tech.

@@Blackeyemofo Bro you really think they're not trying hard??? I'm sorry but you don't get to say they haven't been trying hard when they've had to vastly widen their conscription efforts and have been having to resort to using bullets from 40 years ago. They are trying REALLY hard but they are just vastly ineffective in both war materials and personnel. They've shown the entire world that their military is mostly bluff at this point due to extensive corruption and ineptitude.

@@imreloadin they havnt even used a 1/5th of their known active personnel. A little under 1/15th of their active plus reserve… if Russia were to be trying they would be sending hoards of dudes with no weapon to charge a machine gun nest like they did in ww2

Its simple. Russia don´t attack, and it don´t happen. The only possible war now is a nuclear war.

The American government is under control of nuclear warmongering imperialists lee by biden prestige but russia is under an dictator who abuses his position and commits war crimes.

Ok no one gonna talk about indie

LOL😂

yeah i was just thinking ab that

Now that you mention it yes.

@Deceased Canadian Goose really? Wow that’s impressive

@Deceased Canadian Goose what does this comment mean for this

As I was sitting here watching that I was thinking pretty much what you just said and then I glanced down and there it was. But yes you are correct. So if he could like maybe make a video about World war 3 not happening and me hitting the lottery you know that'd be great.

Lol facts

Yeah literally I think this creator and similar will need to reevaluate their estimations on the military capabilities and strength of Russia’s forces.

@@danielramirez1529 should release a new one where Moscow falls within a week.

Actually Russia could take Ukraine easily if they want to. They are only sending their old weapons to Ukraine so that they can use their better weapons against Nato incase they started to attack Russia. And remember they also have hypersonic missile technology that NATO doesn't have so they only need very few hypersonic missiles to attack useful parts of Ukraine and end everything. Remember one hypersonic missile can destroy the capital of Ukraine in less than 30 minute. Now I'm not picking sides I'm just saying what could happen so don't come at me with your snowflake attitude.

@@thegoingmeiry hahahahaha no. They have so few hypersonic missiles it wouldn't make a difference otherwise they would have used them. Russia has been proven to be a paper tiger and the world is now laughing at Russia. They have sent T-90 and latest helicopters and strike aircraft and all have been found out. They won't send SU-57 and T-14 because they have so few and will be found to be like everything else Russia has sent to the meat grinder. Not good enough.

Trudeau has let the Canadian military wither away to nothing

It’s all very publicly available information. Except he majorly overplayed the capabilities of Axis countries and underplayed those of the Allies.

frrr

The United States' aircraft carriers would not be sunk. Period.

I mean constant bombardment would reshape the earth, highly doubt a ship would be just fine

@@backupdoughboi6822 you have a point but it wouldnt sink

@@SalvorCraft only a matter of time until we see who is right

I also don't think it's remotely any of the other stuff could take place or already happen in a few hours not everyone is 100% ready all the time and is attacking with planes in the air, marching through countries and have have time for it to be considering hesitating to attack only a few hours after something happens

@@jakeg3126 I couldn't follow any of what you were saying

@@berlyngrey9242 I should've added comma or something. He mentioned them both attacking and counterattacking at same time. I wordy by saying by hour 1, somehow the attacked countries impossibly got mobilized and was ready to defend itself. I don't think a lot of people would even know something happened for a few hours. Everyone was too ready

@Good nest he’s basically saying some of these events would probably happen farther over time.

Maybe they are waiting for Russia to fall further so they can annex some of the disputed land on their boarder

Same but its not fair when leadership makes the rules

YEAH TAKE CARE OF OUR KIDS WHILE WE ARE BEING UNJUST TO OTHER PEOPLE AND MAKING OTHER PEOPLE SUFFER BECAUSE OF US INCLUDING OUR KIDS

@@childskites6346 who then would make the rules? losers?

@Holden Parker So if you aren't a leader you're automatically a loser? Care to explain why?

@@mrdatnigg Any person in a society loses to a leader of its society. The Leader is one and only. Means he or she or it is above the society and any other from this society. Which means that they lose to the leader. Which means they are losers. Of course, they can try to make up the majority, change the game, even change the society. Bit then again, the system is built up and creates a new leader with more power. Again, the leader rules and everyone is a loser against him/her/it.

that’s the problem. They wouldn’t have a chance without nuclear weapons. Which is why a war with NATO Vs Russia would result in nuclear disaster :(

Why would Russia have any qualms to use Nukes? What do they have to lose? West pushed them against the wall.

@@bradleyisclutch Exactly, it's horrifying what will happen to europe and the world when such a thing happens.

You sounds hopeful, and scared.

I think your right USSR today could never beat NATO, like you said though they have the nukes, and if there losing the war really what do you think they're going to do 13000 nukes worldwide and no one going to use them in WW3 I bet the nukes will start flying in less than a week. Guess will see ?

We would mine the seas between China and Taiwan.

Exactly. These kinds of invasions don’t take weeks to prep. You would see the major uptick in activity / build up.

Yeah the US have known all of Russia's movements and numbers months before the Ukraine conflict. NATO and the US would clap China

@@williamwchuang Taiwan isn't part of NATO so i doubt they would get any help defending against China

@@nickt600 Taiwan japan and South Korea are in an alliance called SEATO which is a pacific defense alliance with the USA in it as well

Mentions Russia comes out of Belarus

@@RomeWill @1:53

The poles aren't idiots they've been thinking about this scenario for decades. They're the least likely to be caught by surprise by any hypothetical situation in this video

I asked my dad about this when I was a teen. his response ill never forget. "so long as two men exist that are aware of each others existance, war is inevitable" it's in our nature.

money

@@getgggged123 “Only the dead have seen the end of war.” Plato

War. War never changes

Resources

Yep, possible nuclear warfare is fun...

Probably? Almost all of it is a frikin joke. He's just doing this for bias entertainment.

@@Ghost0fPakistan Then please tell us what you would forecast for WWIII

@@Ghost0fPakistan Think he is clearly quite unbiased. It's no secret Russia stands NO chance against Nato, Putin himself said it. China is a difficult one as China has never fought a modern war. And not at this scale with their unproven tech.

@@ThorSuzuki1 China Russia alliance would destroy NATO. Both China and Russia have allies that this guy conviniently Left out. North Corea alone. Whole make a whole to the NATO. No to mention Iran

Yes yes yes

Would be more entertaining if the guy has better knowledge of how military equipment actually works.

Nope, this Infographics Show video is bogus. I did not watch the video, but it's probably inaccurate if it deals with nuclear war. Extensive war gaming has found that in a ICBM nuclear exchange (i.e., not a tactical nuke situation) the most likely areas to be hit are NOT the USA or Russia or China, but rather...the Pacific Ocean or some other uninhabited area. This is because for the first round, "saber rattling" is common rather than actual strikes. The USA actually though about doing the same thing in WWII, but because it only had two bombs, it did not risk a "demonstration" strike. However, today, with thousands of nuclear missiles on each side, it's feasible to do such demonstration strikes. Upvote me if you found this informative and if the Infographic Show failed to mention this (I'm not going to watch this long episode).

@@zsarimaxim692 he doesn't write the episodes, he's just the narrator, infographics is a big team of people, not just him

@@raylopez99 They briefly mention it in the last 30 seconds, with no real detail. At least watch the a video before you criticise it. I don't care if you don't want to watch a long video (Listen to it in the background if you must). They went to the effort of making it so at least go to the effort of watching their video. It take can easily take 100+ man hours to make a video this long all it cost you is 30 minutes. Worst of all you didn't even bother jumping to the end of video to see if they mention nuclear wars it would have taken what 1-2 minutes max. You probably spent at least 10 writing that ill informed comment.

There was no point in all this demonstration of new technology when nukes were going to end up getting used. It's all pointless. Might as well kick off the football game with an actual football.

Yeah like Finland ans Sweden now members of NATO.

Plain to see real life is just Hearts of Iron 5

@@xhippy4682 yes and also the ineffectiveness of Russia

@@danielsmithiv1279 You are extremely naive if you believe that kid..

Yet again, the Taliban took over in like 1 month after that offensive

@@foolroblox3231 America left the defense of Afghanistan to the official Army and government. Who just.... Left. I think there is a difference there.

it will vary on the day they'll deploy their militaries power. take note that china is one of the great powers with lots of military equipment and personnel's. I just hope that if this happen that great countries have a way to neutralize them without using nukes.

I think if it came down to it, the west would be foolish to underestimate China. Russia obviously isn’t what it used to be but China has tons of tech and tons of money. Of course, it would be hard for the US to conquer the baltics within a day too so I think you’re pretty right there.

Lol, China and Russia are just paper tigers, their armies would all cave unless they resort to Nukes, hasn’t the Ukraine conflict thought everyone that? If Russia hasn’t been able to conquer Ukraine, there’s no way they’ll last even a month against Nato.

If they were secrets, he wouldn’t have known them….duh…

There’s no way he’s giving up Classified material. He’s giving up general information that is already known by all sides. There’s so much we don’t know that’s kept Top Secret.

@@philipwade2103 it was a joke…

Relax dude… Dis is juz another GI Joe cartoon.. 😂

Most of the tactics in the video are for training/what they might do by the book. In reality its not gonna go anywhere near the video different tactics for different times adding in the amount of resources they have at the moment

There is no reason to youse nuclear weapon, Z Chinese want Taiwan in one peace

I don't think it would go nuclear quickly....mutual destruction is suicide....as long as they have hope no one will use nukes....now once a side loses hope that's when nukes will be used. Before you beat them they will want to inflict as much pain as possible

@@kamilwolny Russia doesn’t seem to be so thorough though

@@justplanes295 none of them can, no country will want war, this isn’t Lego or UFC. even if a country will beat another, it’ll sustain heavy damages. Let’s say Russia and US decide to go nuclear, and Us wins, cool it wins. But now it wouldn’t be a world wide power, and it will be like Pakistan or some third world country. Win but at what cost ? Leaders are smart, not children. It’s only us talking about wars

Not really, given that 7 months into Ukraine invasion nukes are still not used. He said nukes within a week, which is extremely early

Conflicts of nations is usually the backbone of their videos.

Yeah, it's nice they got around to acknowledging nukes in a video about WWIII. I mean, it's cool to see all this stuff about how it could play out today. All the best nuclear holocaust movies include a scenario for the start of the war, and it's nice to see that updated. But really, nukes are kinda the assumption for WWIII, and I was really looking for a description of how that might play out. Instead we get a fascinating premise for a video game.

@@beenaplumber8379 I don’t think either side would actually launch the apocalyptic exchange that movies describe. I’d bet limited exchange with deaths in the millions, maybe tens of millions (including from radiation, climate disruption, food shortages, etc.). I think that would be enough to get both sides to back away from the table.

have a look at Patrick Lancaster or Graham Phillips channels, they report from the front lines, so we can see some truth.

Yea, I got that too.

If you live in America you don’t need to be scared we good lol

@@Dylan-uz4nq Canada gang 🥱

If this channel is talking about it. You bet it's going to freaking happen 😭

Blame on Joe Biden for not doing his job right

@@fuzzbuzz2968 bro we are part of NATO. Which means Canada has to help.

Clearly vehicle and weapons maintenance is very high on the priority list if you want to be successful outside of having sheer numbers

It more highlights that war is a conflict of structures, not independent pieces. In war, 1+1 >>>>>>> 2. Just because you have some high tech elements in your army, if you don't have the necessary training, logistics and economy to support it, up-to-date doctrines to make the most of it, and accurate intelligence to pinpoint enemy weaknesses, it won't matter at all.

@@user-cj9jk1pd4g exactly

@@pabis6817 the resolve of the owners of the land matter too. Hitler's army was way bigger than that of the UK. Yet he couldn't sweep them like he did to France.

Yes it's being obedient to God or be consumed. No king is saved by his vast army, No warrior escapes from his great strength

Yeah Hong Kong would totally revolt and a civil war would occur so China would have to deal with that too.

Furthermore war with NATO would focus support from the people nobody wants to see their country destroyed regardless of the regime

Yeah, any dissenters will know enough to keep low, they will know the consequences of challenging the popular lies. Even in an open society like the USA they had very little effect during the oil wars. And the "right to life" people will be screaming for blood of course.

@@gunslinger9171 I would personally revive the 'mandate of the emperor' concept and make the position democratic, then rule China by sheer power of not understanding their politics!

You underestimate the level of resistance of general populations once they're seeing large volumes of their country men killed. The Ukraine war has show massive public outcries and protests against the Russian government. as well as troops who were misinformed of their tasks, and object significantly to the point of critically low morale and desertion. This has been the reality in Ukraine, whilst they are against an almost infinitely motivated opponent fighting strongly for their freedoms from occupation, including civilians who have been fighting, or erecting obstacles and traps.

Command wouldn't tell them they are...just like the conscripts and the equipment they sent to Ukraine in the first weeks was literally canon fodder but Russian government told the the conscripts it was just "a special operation and that Ukraine would welcome them"

@@martinvargas5739 That's a Western propaganda narrative.

True, you could also say the same thing with nato infantry, Low iq cannon fodder. The ones waging the war wouldn't be the ones fighting

@@Meloncholymadness The fact that they were canon fodder is not though. Thats just reality with conscripts going into a war the first days.

I wouldnt wanna be a driver of russian anything in ukraine right now st.javalin is watching 🤣🇺🇦🇺🇦

Russia is winning here lol

​@Bearstat in a realistic scenario russia will fall within 5 months

No matter what happens, this man takes the side of the West and pushes the video towards the victory of the West because he is an American himself

We have two primary deployment modes. Airborne mode, with somewhat limited assets deployable and while granted, it's an impressive capability, a full army it is not. Then, there's marine transportation mode, which can take weeks to get shiploads of angry men and angrier equipment.

Agreed.

@@spvillano it depends on the theater of the conflict. The US has forward deployed equipment in several places that's all maintained and wouldn't take weeks to deploy. Also several nations use equipment the US has sold them so they could use them while waiting. Plus a bunch of other logistics stuff that we probably don't have a clue about. Then there's the weapons that have been developed tested and never needed that people never think about. One of those things is a reason I don't think China would be very effective at the extreme long range missile strikes against the navy. About the only accurate thing in this video is most likely the very end.

Russia wouldn't last a week and ill give china two weeks

Russia and China have allies. The East is just too strong

Also a bunch of country’s have f35s

I thought someone else had to notice that, lol.

the vertical and horizontal stabilizers are also different

@@ewyattgd5411 there are a LOT of key differences, but I figured thrusters was just the easiest thing I could point out that the average person (who doesent know anything about jets) would understand as a visual difference between the two.

nerds

You think they are bad, wait until you see China fight, they have ZERO combat experience unlike the Russians.

You mean how Russia alone resists the total support of NATO, which is already spending all the free equipment and ammunition and cannot send any more. And Russia begined to fight with very small forces, numbering less than 200 thousand and only now reaching 700 thousand, having more than 3 million in reserve. The NATO general also said that the Russians could reach Kyiv in 3 days. Russia reached it in 1.5 days. Additionally, Russian tactics in Ukraine are to save as many people as possible on both sides while also preserving Ukrainian infrastructure. We can at any moment, in just an hour, make the whole country of Ukraine without electricity, then sending it into the Stone Age, we can at any moment destroy all railway and sea junctions, make any support impossible. But we don’t do that because Ukrainians -are our people , and the Ukrainian infrastructure is also ours. But in NATO countries the picture will be radically different, all cities, communications, ports, power plants will be immediately burned in first hour.

Yes...though,I always feared this would happen! I'm even more frightened in the fact Russia could (might not) attack the UK where I'm from as I've got my whole future ahead and it's scary being in a country that is helping Ukraine to attack Russia! Even scarier to be in a country AT war! The more Russia fights the more country's that get involved and it gets more dangerous...there is a matter of time when Britain goes to war....I think this war would go on for quite a couple of years as it did for ww2 might not though as greater technology is being made So yeah

While the PLAN is not on the same footing as the USN in capability, that gap is steadily closing. Yet in terms of sheer numbers, the PLAN is the global leader.

Finally,a knowledgeable person…we are simply the best. War is our business,we have been at war for 100 yrs somewhere..we are the supreme warlords of this planet.

And Russia has more nukes than USA. Means better not defeat Russia, or everyone dies together. You got it?

@@ScpDrRisha ukraine isn’t attacking russia mate

There's no way that was an accident! LOL

The game is literally just this video but you control it😂

I like that ending, no more suffering

@@PatrickMenesesYTOfficial4945 underrated ending lol

we're just a dust in the universe. i guess a nuclear dust is much cooler.

That part ‼️ 🤓

When the United States is your close allie then you are world power.

As a fellow Aussie, I actually came looking for this comment as I thought the same thing haha. I did look it up though. The Global Fire power Index has is at no. 17, between Germany and Israel.

'Straya!

@@braddles5639 so we are above Israel, which has nuclear weapons? Wow I have new respect for our defence forces.

@@joellyneham1987 that's because a treaty between the USA and the UK allows Australia to have nuclear armed fleets

True, they also failed to mention CAPTOR mines. A nice blanket of those, originally intended for the GIUK gap would do nicely in the Black Sea and in the strait along the Taiwanese coast.

As is the B-1B bomber. It has an RCS 100 times smaller than a B-52.

F-22 and F-35 dont have as good radar "hiding" abilities as Rafale I think

american channel, so...

@@flair500 Rafale is nothing compared to f35 what

The crickets would win, with their high numbers of support ants, as the inferior support for the cockroaches from the beetles means that the war would end rather quickly

the burning oil in the sea 16:12 yikes! good idea tho

african countries will survive.!!!!

@@epic_moments1000 survive what?

Yes, the mid 90's graphics and narrative remind me of teaching an A/V class at West Junior High School. Seriously, I have a Dell computer with Windows 98 that I can donate to you, it will really enhance your video production quality over what you are using now. ;))

@@crankychris2 I was on about the actual content, research and thought

tbh this channel teaches me how to observe what goes on in life and predict the outcomes that could happen

Aaaaaand dont actuwlly happen anything like how infographics say it would. Which is not surprising given the propagamda style lies like in this video. Hour 2.....crippling sanctions againat russia for taking crimea.....nope. thats a flat out lie!

@@codyspencer7047 why ):

Tbh I'm hoping it doesn't happen just to see the pessimists getting dunked on

Oh nah dont say that 💀

but the outcome would be the same if they declared war, no? talking about the use of nuclear weapons

Little emperors

Thank you. Also, it seems weird that Infographic is giving the Chinese air power so much credibility when they did a video about their failures, including the J-10 and their trying master carrier landings.

@@seanthomxx2694 it just came out that Chinas population will start to decline this year as opposed to next decade so maybe they’re being paid off to give china a handicap.

And what this shows especially at the start shows nato amd specifically the us doing absolutely nothing until china already strikes which is extremely unrealistic

Dude, Italians who lives even in Aust NZ US UK having difficulty speaking English

Thats cool but your observations are irrelevant. Language is an issue and translation is needed. Only about 34% of Italians can speak English for example, and some of those peoples levels are quite low. Less than 40% of Polish speak English and under 10% speak it fluently. In a world war, translation is needed because language is an issue. You're just wrong with this comment.

@@puranapuu4252 It's not hard to understand basic broke english

honestly, I know plenty of Europeans who speak better english than many locals I know 😁😁

@@fuzzblightyear145 Why wouldn't they be fluent and well versed at English? English is an official language of the European Union and English was literally invented in Europe. lol

Me too

Were bonna die

Hello checkmark.

Same!

Why does this feel like an npc comment😂

Yeah I doubt the us would be caught so off guard. We’re always looking for a war, we would be much more ready. At least on one front lol

@@FrankBUILTperformance I paid $85 for a 3 minute doctors visit and antibiotic yesterday. That better be for a reason.

@LibtardsStillCant SilenceMe20 actually I give in, you recognize in the UK, if you have a heart attack you don’t have to wait, right? General wait times for doctor visits are equal to the US, as is emergency response/intake. And for specialist visits it’s determined on an as needed basis, if you have an emergency you get in, same as the US. What does have higher wait times are elective and nonemergency surgeries, think colonoscopy, which have about double our wait times. However you fail to realize a nationalized system would cut OUR direct health expense by about 40%, that’s about a new car for me. That’s how much more efficient a system like the NHS is. As for death panels, no, just fake news, and as for forced abortions, no you do not, unless you know someone in China, but that’s not exactly on their healthcare system. Goodbye bot.

Oh that 40% is if you have an average HMO plan, if you’re uninsured it could be 100’s of thousands.

@@JeikuAnimeReview of value, absolutely. $100 an aspirin at the hospital, or 3k for a 5 min ride in a glorified bus, not at all. Our system is built for the rich, and why our infant mortality rate is ranked so much lower than European countries’.

Never underestimate the power of America unleashed with no battlefield rules of engagement

China is much more competent at warfare than Russia is. It's better to be prepared for a very dangerous fight.

Probably cause this was 6 months ago ... Russia's incompetence and China's inexperience will certainly have an impact.

@@topspot4834 yup they’ll definitely use nukes and then nato and us will use nukes and then we’ll all die

Lol, i guess thats his opinion

what makes you think that? China and Russia are super powers with thousands of nukes.

🤣 right 🤭

This isn't a theory, this is the inevitable future at this rate.

@@necrogenesis1981 if Russia nukes America or Ukrainie

@@Empire. which is going to happen, Putin is crazy. I might as well skip writing my will since nobody will be left anyway.

@@necrogenesis1981 might as well try to enjoy life while we can

1

I agree. This video is mostly based on paper stats. For example, the amount of tanks and missiles each country holds. It's more of a show of brut force and nothing else. I doubt Russia and China would be half as successful as this video shows.

@@SarcasticTruth117 init evidence that this vid isn’t accurate is literally happening right now in Ukraine. Were they can’t even beat a singular country nvm 30 odd

Was my first thought as well, maybe even a week looking at how a certain operation currently is going...

@@SarcasticTruth117 i doubt us would practically survive even a month if ww3 starts. Chinese will because they are Asians who can survive in nature. USA will be wiped out of world within 15 days if china and russia join hands

I think your favorite word is intense

Intense hehe

Trolllolololol

He just gives Russia and China too much credit got to remember America's been at war for 20 years they're pretty good at it

Even just 4 months ago you should of known how silly this video was based on Russia's performance.

@@shaynewheeler9249 Save Palestine

Farts

@@shaynewheeler9249 farts, but also beans

Not to mention it leaves out the use of nukes being deployed very early on.

Yea, it’s pretty biased

Maybe Russia, but Idk about China. Only China knows whats going on in China.

Chinas policy is to get Taiwan to join China peacefully. If all efforts fail, military force will be used as a last resort

Yea overestimating is better than underestimating

It won't really be "living" just marking time. I'd rather be vaporized.

If you live in the americas you will be untouched until nukes fly. Then if you don't live in major cities you still won't be touched.

Basically the dark ages but with fallout

So...what Ukraine is going through right now?

@@HylianJayAppears yeah but worse