لا اله الا الله وحده لا شريك له له الملك وله الحمد وهو على كل شيء قدير يحيي ويميت وهو الحي الذي لا يموت وأشهد أن محمداً عبده ورسوله 🕋☪️🤲🏻🇵🇸 الإسلام الدين الحق والقرآن الكريم رسالة الله
I wonder who got owned in marasesti, marasti and oituz🤔 is it possible that the glorious austrian military got destroyed by a tiny undersupplied army with no experience and was entirely stopped from pushing?
@@StackND I don't think those 3 battles mattered that much. It was Romania who wanted to join the war and its their fault that it had a tiny and undersupplied army. What was the result? Romania got occupied and had to do a seperate treaty with the Central Powers.
@@mcray79 mighty german war machine stopped by... Some farmers. You really want to make it seem like you managed to do anything other than march into half of the country with the combined power of three nations... And then fail to take the rest.
@@USA_G0vernment no bruh did u know russian empire was really poor starving to death all people and soldiers realllyyy bad equiped while german empire had the best military and russian empire had to fight german empire austria-hungary bulgaria and ottoman
@@USA_G0vernmentthen your comment becomes if russia was stronger central power would lise, which is a stupid comment in the first place. russia was in a bad situation even before the revolution
@@USA_G0vernmentRussia was very poor when WW1 started, they lacked food, ammunition,... Russia would lose this war sooner or later. Not to mention they had to fight almost all the central powers (Germany, Austria, Bulgaria, Ottomans) they couldn't import food because both Germany and Ottomans controlled the banticl sea and the black sea.
I mean as a Romanian I don't think we did that bad... The Entente promised us before the war to land in Thessaloniki (northern Greece) in order to help but they didn't. Without that, Wallachia (that southern part of Romania) was pretty indefensible on account of you know, being surrounded on all sides by the enemy so of course we lost it. We managed to hold Moldova and stabilize the front until the Russian kicked the bucket, after that, no way in hell would we hold. I mean we have to have done something ok considering the Germans had to send von Mackensen to bail the Austro-Hungarians out.
@@christiankurtiqi5992 Depends what you call a flag. National flags originated in the maritime trade and for the longest time were not used anywhere else and Austria-Hungary did have a civil ensign
@@desran4447 Because they were practically two countries, only in personal union, so officially there was the kingdom of austria (black and yellow flag) and the kingdom of hungary (red white green) used as national flags
Thank you! A dude who knows history! Indeed Russia was supposed to help both Serbia and Romania but help never come and Russia turned into URSS. The good part is that both countries did better after the war until the coming of the second.....
@@krytiichyvak the most advanced you ever got was strapping multiple kalashnikov rifles to a single apparatus, calling it an "anti aircraft" gun and having the americunts kiss Ukraine arsenal about it.
@@austria-hungary7680 In 1878 rusii au luat Buceagul dand in schimb Dobrogea, granita de sud nu a fost delimitata urmand sa se faca la masa tratativelor. Romania dorea aceasi suprafata pe care rusii au furat-o in 1878, astfel ca acel sud de Dobrogea era practic paritatea la schimb. Dar rusii intentionat au lasat sudul neimpartit, se ghidau dupa ,,divide et impera,,.
It really does go to show the power of the Russian Empire. Yes, their country collapsed and they lost a lot of land, but they were an unstable power, with underdevelopment in many aspects of the country, and had a border with all central powers country except Bulgaria, and held the line against the most powerful militaries in the world. In the situation they were in, they did phenomenal. Germany was in it's absolute prime a country that even Britain had fears about.
Meh, Ottomans are the most impressing in this war. Russia had numbers, at least, while ottomans had like 4-5 fronts, that they were holding for 4 years. Ottoman empire outlived Habsburg, German, and Russian empires.
@@sircatangry5864 Ottoman empire outlived the Russian German and Habsburgs because ottomans were already failing and no one saw them as a strong empire .Allies were more focused on germany and Habsburgs. firstly the ottoman empire wasn't a threat at all even tho they were holding multiple fronts .( not even holding they lost most of it ) The only impressive thing they did was manage to fight war despite their situation
немцы всегда умели воевать и это не то что они сильны или мускулистые они дисциплинированные и это было самое главное как говорится немцы это римские легионеры второй мировой войны вспомните когда римская армия смогла победить с 80 тысяч против 250 -300 тысяч галлов вот так же и третий рейх против ссср успешно воевали хотя в итоге проиграли.
Damn, that last quote was so hard hitting >Comrades, the workers and peasants revolution, the necessity of which was repeatedly stated by the bolsheviks, IS COMPLETE
@@user-by2zd3fl9j no exaggeration, Russia's situation was bad anyway, even though they had more troops and Romania's territory was mainly defended by the Romanian army and from what you can see here, Romania probably lasted longer than Russia
Россия не была оккупирована, Россия была в состоянии продолжать войну, просто большевики решили заключить мир, так как войска были нужнее для гражданской войны
I advise you to familiarize yourself with the Brusilov breakthrough (1916). This is one of the most important operations of Russia, thanks to which the French were able to win the Battle of Verdun. Now it can be hard to believe that we helped each other.
The german giant land grab at the end was what lost them the war. They could have had millions more soldiers on the west, by just settling with limited privileges to secure their supplies rather than actually controlling those lands that required so much occupation manpower
Thats not what lost them the war and relocating those soldiers (many of which they did, and more were on the way) wouldnt have changed the result because unfortunately britain was blockading germanys ports which starved the country and all the civilians and as a result the army. They had no choice but to surrender. What they shouldve done was relocate more experienced soldiers from the east to the west during their early successes against russia because they did more with less soldiers so they shouldve only kept enough there to make steady gains or keep the russians at bay. I agree they were a bit greedy though but you have to understand the era ww1 was in. Everyone was greedy. Land and territory mas very important. Germany was actually one of the least greedy states. They had to secure the lands in the east or else russia or the ussr could rearm gather their bearings and launch an counteroffensive much easier
@@user-ch9my3to6j could have traded with who? Ukraine was in total chaos with a complete breakdown of central authority. The Germans knew if they Ukraine was left to its own devices it would be torn apart by anarchists, communists, monarchists, and social democrats. Which is exactly what happened when they withdrew.
@@cmt6997 i guess i underestimated the situation in the east then. it seems like the germans are destinated to lost the war no matter what they could have done and that will cause the 2nd world war, they are deemed to lose everything no matter what they choose in a history after 1914. how sad
Anyone know why the Germans/Austrians/Bulgarians never finished occupying Romania after it surrendered? I can see their soldiers disappear but the remaining land stays blue for the rest of the war.
ww1 wasn't really like ww2 in thar it was fighting to the bitter end everywhere with one big treaty. Some countries signed treaties that got them out of the war early
Romania still existed as a country and managed to withstand some major offensives, in the end it played out well for them. tough decisions in tough times. but correct decisions. keep in mind that Romanian Monarchy in that time was of German origin, but still had the historical balls to decide to side with the allies.
Great Retreat is truly the greatest event in history of my country Serbia. What our great grandfathers have survived for us to be able to have freedom is something we will cherish and celebrate until the end of time. SLAVA IM!
@@creepquest It is, Finnish Reds began their own uprising after the revolution in Russia and the country was plunged into a civil war, it could have even turned communist if not for the German invasion which massively helped the local White forces. Russian Empire and Finland had a rough relationship in the last decades before the fall, some Finns even went to Germany to fight on their side in the war, but at least it was peaceful
Man I just realized this if Russia didn’t attack German empire and just built there economy and help with stopping the revolts usa and Russia will still be friends
O Apetite dos americanos é voraz, eles não tem amigos, a guerra atual não é para atacar a Rússia, os Liberais americanos estão afundando a Europa. A Alemanha lutar contra a Rússia é uma loucura que nunca favoreceu esses países e sim os Anglos.
@@rafael-flu5602The British managed to pit the Russians and Germans against each other. The Alliance of the Three Emperors, which posed an incredible threat to Britain, but protected the interests of both the Germans and the Russians, was to be preserved. Then the story would have gone completely differently...
@@victordegtyarev1006A guerra da Ucrânia hoje é a continuação da mesma política, causar rupturas entre russos e alemães, o financiamento de Hitler pelo ocidente também esperavam que Hitler atacaria apenas os Russos.
The US and Russia would never be friends. The Empire was a murder machine uncaring for its own people and leading to the death of all of Russia. Even if it hadn't fallen however, the US and Russians would either have differing goals and would be enemies, or the Russians would be under the control of the US.
@@austria-hungary7680I mean like you can not just forget a massive country like the Ottoman Empire joined the war? And they did fight with the British in the Egypt and stuff…
But Ottomans lost at Caucasus and was pushed back, same at Egypt, at Iraq territory when British troops landed there for defend Persian oil, and other stuff, and when they was failed at Caucasus, they started kill armenians, that more than 1.300.000 people died from this genocide, So only thing what ottomans did is fighting vs some of British troops, so ottomans don't was such big trouble for Any country at this war, only for British, but not for so long.
Получить что-то должны были большевики, которые отказалась выплачивать долги РИ и подписали сепаратный мир с центральными державами? Убийственная логика
The fact that serbia lasted that long against the austrians is actually very impressive! (Yes i do know the austrians was in a very bad situation at the time)
Даже если бы не Гражданская война мы бы всё равно проиграли, особенно с Николаем II , но для нас это всё равно гражданская война оказалась лучшим исходом
Во-первых: Россия практически всегда побежала в войнах, в которых участвовала. Во-вторых: численное превосходство мало что даёт, если твоя армия более устаревшая и менее обученная, чем у врага.
@@seiro8606 В ПМВ с обоих сторон воевали по большей части мобики без какого-либо опыта войны, и, соответсвенно, приобритали они его тоже более-менее одновременно с обоих сторон. Гораздо большую роль сыграли вещи более банальные - количество и качество артиллерии и путей сообщения. Перед войной в немецком генштабе боялись, что если Российская Империя завершит (иронично) запланированное закончиться в 1917 году перевооружение, то её будет невозможно победить. Очевидно, что за такой короткий срок нельзя внезапно научиться хорошо воевать, зато что можно, так это наладить производство всех необходимых для современной войны вещей и накопить их приличный запас
Чел, Россия проиграла не Германии, она проиграла большевикам. Если бы не предатели в феврале и октябре 1917 года - Германии не видать победы над Россией как и высадки в Британии. Это доказывает хотя бы то, что до революций при самых худших условиях - немцы не продвинулись дальше Польши.
@@user-vj7dn6ll5hтак даже до двух революций 1917 года Русская императорская армия гораздо чаще отступала, как в 1915, чем наступала, как во время Брусиловского прорыва летом 1916. И это при том, что имела подавляющее численное превосходство над немцами, вдобавок у немцев был ещё второй большой фронт на западе, а у России мелкий Кавказский фронт. И вдовесок немцы обеспечивали себя сами, а царь выезжал на западном лендлизе, впрочем как и Сталин во второй мировой войне. Без западной помощи и западного второго фронта ни цари, ни большевики не выдержали бы натиска немцев, невзирая на колоссальную разницу в численности населения и мобилизационного ресурса.
Amazing how much more troops Russia had and still lost the war. This really shows that numbers don't necessarily means that these troops are well equipped
The bro is confusing the words. "equipment" and "revolution" are completely different concepts. Russia did not violate international treaties and did not use gas + Russia fought on 3 fronts, and the Eastern Front was too long to defend it. If you knew at least something about the tactics of warfare, you would understand why in 1915 the Russian Imperial Army retreated and gained a foothold, holding the defense for 2 years. Your comment shows us the level of education in the USA xd
@@MisterEvrey Russia fought on 1 front only. The Ottoman front is in the mountains so it was hard to defend. The Russian military was completely and utterly devastated by the numerically inferior German and Astro-Hungarian forces.
@@MisterEvrey Small and insignificant fronts. The Russians had no play in tthe defeat of the Ottoman Empire. It was entirely Allied victory. Russia lost the war and was humiliated
No, in 1922, the White Russian Army existed. This means that Russia won the First World War, because the White Army did not recognize the shameful Brest peace.
Yea these days they are invading to protect their people in eastern ukraine. I don't support either side of the war but ukraine fucked up big by not honouring the minsk agreement.
Because the flag were combined Austria & Hungarian is not official, and they represent that because Austria is suffering Low stability to its people...
If you thought this was crazy, look at the Russian civil war. Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic vs. White Russia Poland Germany Austria-Hungary Czechoslovak Legion Romania Poland Estonia Latvia Lithuania Empire of Japan United Kingdom United States France Italy Ukraine Hungary Greece Green Army Guess who won? (Excluding the Polish-Soviet war which is a slight Polish victory due to a break in communications; Kamenev’s fault)
Тува, монголия , Финляндия , грузия, Азербайджан, армения , Казахстан, Таджикистан, Узбекистан, Туркменистан, Каракалпакстан, Корея, турция и просто вечь мир был против РСФСР. Осталось понять, против кого ьыл РСФСР, и чтанет ясно, что все ой как просто
Тува, монголия , Финляндия , грузия, Азербайджан, армения , Казахстан, Таджикистан, Узбекистан, Туркменистан, Каракалпакстан, Корея, турция и просто вечь мир был против РСФСР. Осталось понять, против кого ьыл РСФСР, и чтанет ясно, что все ой как просто
ww1 started by the rus that backed up the slavs of serbia knowing that it would cause a german backup for austria ww2 started by the rus that had major interest to take a huge chunk of poland and make entire europe bolshevik (they fought wars within 1919, 1920 etc while ww1 was already over ww3 started by the rus that attacked ukraine? Tell me what you want the rus expansion plans were always a major part of the wars without them it wouldnt have been world wars and the first one would have been won by the germans. history books only show the war declarations not the cause of the declarations and alliance system.
Какой ценой? Если бы не предательская октябрьская революция, то Россия бы вышла победителем в 1 мировой войне и возможно не появилась бы Германия под руководством фюрера.
@@Slavic_union Оттуда, что Германия вела войну на 2 фронта под морской блокадой, а все два её союзника терпели поражение за поражением. К тому же 6 апреля 1917 в войну вступили США, 18 мая в них началась мобилизация в армию 1 миллиона человек. Всё, что нужно было для неминуемой победы это продержаться в войне до следующей весны, когда новоприбывшие американские дивизии сломают многолетний паритет западного фронта и позволят союзникам нанести решающий удар (что не произошло в реальной жизни, потому что весной 1918 Германия, осовободившая собственные дивизии с восточного фронта, вела уже своё наступление, которое американцам ещё сначала пришлось останавливать). Никаких военных причин почему этого сделать было нельзя не существовало, обороняться в ПМВ было несравнимо легче, чем наступать, траншеи давно уже были вырыты, не было и намёка на немецкое наступление, которое если бы и произошло тут же было бы использованно союзниками чтобы ударить на западе, с которого нобходимо было снять дивизии для прорыва на востоке. Коммунисты вышли из войны исключительно по политичсеким причинам - они пришли ко власти на штыках трусов и дезертиров, которые были готовы махать любой красной тряпкой, лишь бы им пообещали, что их не отправят на фронт. Потом, конечно, это обещание было нарушено - большевики закрепившись у власти назад всех мобилизовали для гражданки, только вот к тому моменту у них уже не было ни штыков ни ружей чтобы считаться с их мнением, а для дезертиров и трусов вернули расстрелы
@@TesticleTortureGaming I do not remember the German troops in St. Petersburg (Leningrad) or in Moscow. But I do know for sure that Russian troops were in Berlin twice. So you should double-check your knowledge of history.
@@Leantenant okay, please educate me then. What was the second time the Russians took Berlin? At least we can agree that Germany owned Russia in the first world war, right? Even though they didn't capture Petrograd or Moscow, they still won the first.
@@user-by2zd3fl9jвойну с Наполеоном 1812 года целиком и полностью оплатила Британия, используя крепостных России как пушечное мясо и торпеду на французов, а во второй мировой войне лендлиз официально был задокументирован 1 октября 1941, на 4-й месяц войны, и британские танки уже отражали атаку Вермахта под Москвой. Потом поставки западного оружия только возрастали уже в 1942-1943.
@@diamondvankiessling8869 ну так факт в том , что те самые крепостные и выиграли Наполеона . Что именно оплатила Британия?Британцы трусливо сидели на своих островах в блокаде , в то время как русские шли вперёд , а уже когда мы подходили к Парижу она решила "присоединиться". За 3 месяца Вермахт уже оккупировал до хрена территорий Совка пока "Союзники" не решались на чью сторону встать , но когда увидели , что мы выиграли битву за Москву , то поняли весь потенциал и решили вместе Вермахта качать Совок .
the reason germany is gaining ppl at the beginning rapidlyi is bc the schlieffen plan (prob butchered that) where they put most the troops on the french border cus itd take a while for russai to fully mobilize, but they couldnt kill france in time so they had to mobilize to russia
For those who don't get what happened: In 2017 March there was a February Revolution in Russia, The Provisional Goverment defeated Emperor Nikolai II. But The Provisional Goverment got upset. They failed their operation on the front in July, and In October, communists defeated Provisional Goverment and stopped the war on Eastern Front.
